Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation

Relevance of distinctions and parallels between the US and EU guidelines for determination of comparative effectiveness and safety of the orally inhaled drug products

Approval of drug products for market registration warrants, among other data, evidence to support their safety and effectiveness in the target populations. The extent of investigations to provide the supporting evidence varies between the new innovator products and their follow-on versions generally referred to as Generic Drugs Products in the United States and Hybrids in the Europe. The new drug applications entail large data sets encompassing both nonclinical and clinical product developments. Safety and effectiveness in man is studied in sequentially phased clinical trials, including post marketing evaluations (Where applicable). However, for the generic/hybrid products the safety and effectiveness are established through determination of bioequivalence in head-to-head comparison between the originator and the follow-ons. Methods for documentation of bioequivalence for drug products that reach target site(s) through systemic circulation are aligned worldwide. However, establishing bioequivalence of orally inhaled drug products is complex as drug delivery to the local site(s) of action is independent of the systemic circulation. Documentation of bioequivalence gets further complicated due to the Drug-Device combination nature of these products. The guidelines for establishment of BE of locally acting orally inhaled drugs products vary among certain geographies. This article examines the scientific underpinning of distinctions and similarities between the US and EU guidelines.

Designing inhaled small molecule drugs for severe respiratory diseases: an overview of the challenges and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled drugs offer advantages for the treatment of respiratory diseases over oral drugs by delivering the drug directly to the lung, thus improving the therapeutic index. There is an unmet medical need for novel therapies for lung diseases, exacerbated by a multitude of challenges for the design of inhaled small molecule drugs.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the challenges and opportunities for the design of inhaled drugs for respiratory diseases with a focus on new target discovery, medicinal chemistry, and pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicological evaluation of drug candidates.

EXPERT OPINION

Inhaled drug discovery is facing multiple unique challenges. Novel biological targets are scarce, as is the guidance for medicinal chemistry teams to design compounds with inhalation-compatible features. It is exceedingly difficult to establish a PK/PD relationship given the complexity of pulmonary PK and the impact of physical properties of the drug substance on PK. PK, PD and toxicology studies are technically challenging and require large amounts of drug substance. Despite the current challenges, the authors foresee that the design of inhaled drugs will be facilitated in the future by our increasing understanding of pathobiology, emerging medicinal chemistry guidelines, advances in drug formulation, PBPK models, and in vitro toxicology assays.

The Link between Periodontal Disease and Asthma: How Do These Two Diseases Affect Each Other?

A growing body of evidence suggests that the effects of poor oral hygiene extend beyond the oral cavity and are associated with a variety of systemic diseases, including asthma. Asthma, which results in symptoms of cough, wheezing, and dyspnoea, and is characterized by airflow limitation with variability and (partial or complete) reversibility, is amongst the most prevalent respiratory diseases with approximately 262 million patients worldwide, and its prevalence and disease burden is on the increase. While asthma can occur at a young age, it can also develop later in life and affects a variety of age groups. Both of these diseases have a chronic course, and various researchers have suggested a link between the two. In this article, we aim to provide a literature review focusing on the association between the two diseases. The results demonstrate that medications (primarily, inhaler medicine), hypoxia induced by asthma, and the breathing behaviour of patients potentially trigger periodontal disease. In contrast, oral periodontopathogenic microorganisms and the inflammatory mediators produced by them may be involved in the onset and/or exacerbation of asthma. Common contributing factors, such as smoking, gastro-oesophageal reflux, and type-2 inflammation, should also be considered when evaluating the relationship between the two diseases.

Low-dose intrapulmonary drug delivery device for studies on next-generation therapeutics in mice

Although nebulizers have been developed for delivery of small molecules in human patients, no tunable device has been purpose-built for targeted delivery of modern large molecule and temperature-sensitive therapeutics to mice. Mice are used most of all species in biomedical research and have the highest number of induced models for human-relevant diseases and transgene models. Regulatory approval of large molecule therapeutics, including antibody therapies and modified RNA highlight the need for quantifiable dose delivery in mice to model human delivery, proof-of-concept studies, efficacy, and dose-response. To this end, we developed and characterized a tunable nebulization system composed of an ultrasonic transducer equipped with a mesh nebulizer fitted with a silicone restrictor plate modification to control the nebulization rate. We have identified the elements of design that influence the most critical factors to targeted delivery to the deep lungs of BALB/c mice. By comparing an in silico model of the mouse lung with experimental data, we were able to optimize and confirm the targeted delivery of over 99% of the initial volume to the deep portions of the mouse lung. The resulting nebulizer system provides targeted lung delivery efficiency far exceeding conventional nebulizers preventing waste of expensive biologics and large molecules during proof-of-concept and pre-clinical experiments involving mice. (Word Count =207).

Modeling of pulmonary deposition of agents of open and fixed dose triple combination therapies through two different low-resistance inhalers in COPD: a pilot study

Introduction

Inhalation therapy is a cornerstone of treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Inhaler devices might influence the effectiveness of inhalation therapy. We aimed to model and compare the deposition of acting agents of an open and a fixed dose combination (FDC) triple therapy and examine their repeatability.

Methods

We recruited control subjects (Controls, n = 17) and patients with stable COPD (S-COPD, n = 13) and those during an acute exacerbation (AE-COPD, n = 12). Standard spirometry was followed by through-device inhalation maneuvers using a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and a soft mist inhaler (SMI) to calculate deposition of fixed dose and open triple combination therapies by numerical modeling. Through-device inspiratory vital capacity (IVC_d) and peak inspiratory flow (PIF_d), as well as inhalation time (t_in) and breath hold time (tbh) were used to calculate pulmonary (PD) and extrathoracic deposition (ETD) values. Deposition was calculated from two different inhalation maneuvers.

Results

There was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) between patients (S-COPD: 42 ± 5% vs. AE-COPD: 35 ± 5% predicted). Spiriva^® Respimat^® showed significantly higher PD and lower ETD values in all COPD patients and Controls compared with the two pMDIs. For Foster^® pMDI and Trimbow^® pMDI similar PD were observed in Controls, while ETD between Controls and AE-COPD patients did significantly differ. There was no difference between COPD groups regarding the repeatability of calculated deposition values. Ranking the different inhalers by differences between the two deposition values calculated from separate maneuvers, Respimat^® produced the smallest inter-measurement differences for PD.

Discussion

Our study is the first to model and compare PD using pMDIs and an SMI as triple combination in COPD. In conclusion, switching from FDC to open triple therapy in cases when adherence to devices is maintanined may contribute to better therapeutic effectiveness in individual cases using low resistance inhalers.

Production of Inhalable Ultra-Small Particles for Delivery of Anti-Inflammation Medicine via a Table-Top Microdevice

A table-top microdevice was introduced in this work to produce ultrasmall particles for drug delivery via inhalation. The design and operation are similar to that of spray-drying equipment used in industry, but the device itself is much smaller and more portable in size, simpler to operate and more economical. More importantly, the device enables more accurate control over particle size. Using Flavopiridol, an anti-inflammation medication, formulations have been developed to produce inhalable particles for pulmonary delivery. A solution containing the desired components forms droplets by passing through an array of micro-apertures that vibrate via a piezo-electrical driver. High-purity nitrogen gas was introduced and flew through the designed path, which included the funnel collection and cyclone chamber, and finally was pumped away. The gas carried and dried the micronized liquid droplets along the pathway, leading to the precipitation of dry solid microparticles. The formation of the cyclone was essential to assure the sufficient travel path length of the liquid droplets to allow drying. Synthesis parameters were optimized to produce microparticles, whose morphology, size, physio-chemical properties, and release profiles met the criteria for inhalation. Bioactivity assays have revealed a high degree of anti-inflammation. The above-mentioned approach enabled the production of inhalable particles in research laboratories in general, using the simple table-top microdevice. The microparticles enable the inhalable delivery of anti-inflammation medicine to the lungs, thus providing treatment for diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis and COVID-19.

Pharmacokinetics of baicalin and oroxyloside in plasma and different tissues of rats after transnasal aerosol inhalation and intravenous injection of Tanreqing

To avoid adverse drug reactions associated with injection, off-label nebulization of Tanreqing (TRQ) injection is often used in China to treat respiratory diseases. However, the aerodynamic properties and lung availability of TRQ aerosols remain largely uninvestigated. This study aimed to investigate the size distribution of TRQ aerosols and to compare the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of two compounds from TRQ (baicalin and oroxyloside) after transnasal aerosol inhalation and intravenous administration. Furthermore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TRQ against lipopolysaccharide-induced lung inflammation. The Dv(50) and transmission of TRQ aerosols were 2.512 μm and 74.867%, respectively. The Cmax of baicalin and oroxyloside in rat plasma after inhalation was lower than that after intravenous injection. After inhalation, the area under the curve (AUC) of baicalin and oroxyloside in tissues (lung, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and trachea) was 7.9–115.3 and 9.5–16.0 times that observed after intravenous administration, respectively. Baicalin and oroxyloside maintained high concentrations 4 h after inhalation, but only 1 h after intravenous injection. The mean lung-to-plasma concentration ratios of baicalin and oroxyloside were 287.6 and 49.9 times higher than with intravenous administration. Inhaled TRQ achieved the same effect against lipopolysaccharide-induced lung inflammation in mice at doses of only 1/16–1/8 of those administered intravenously. The results indicate that TRQ inhalation is a promising alternative to intravenous injections for the treatment of respiratory infection.

Relative Lung and Systemic Bioavailability Along with Oropharyngeal Deposition of Salbutamol Post-Inhalation: A Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Novel Inhaler Technique Training Gadgets

Background: Suboptimal use of pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) remains a major barrier to inhaled therapy success. Verbal inhaler technique training (VT) fails to maintain patients' good pMDI use, thus training tools might help. Trainhaler^® (THR device) and Flo-Tone^® CR (FTCR device), two novel pMDI technique training tools, were evaluated and compared in terms of relative lung and systemic bioavailability and oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol inhaled from Ventolin^® Evohaler^® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following THR or connected to FTCR. Methods: Sixteen healthy adults inhaled 2 × 100 μg salbutamol puffs (1 minute apart) from Ventolin using the THR device or FTCR device in a two-period, randomized crossover study. A 7-day washout separated THR and FTCR approaches. Immediately after each puff inhalation, each subject gargled with 20 mL water for oropharyngeal deposition determination. Urine samples were collected 0.5 hour (pre-inhalation) and 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 hours post-inhalation. Urine was then pooled till 24-hour post-inhalation. The relative lung bioavailability (0- to 0.5-hour urinary salbutamol excretion-USAL0.5) and relative systemic bioavailability (0- to 24-hour urinary excretion of salbutamol and its metabolite-USALMET24) were determined. Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) USAL0.5 of the THR and FTCR groups was 5.70 (6.43) and 11.39 (9.67) μg, respectively. The mean (SD) oropharyngeal deposition was 11.11 (4.37) and 6.09 (1.89) μg, respectively. The THR and FTCR devices were statistically significantly different in USAL0.5 and oropharyngeal deposition (p < 0.001), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in USALMET24. Conclusion: The THR device and the FTCR device showed positive impact on inhaled pMDI delivery. Indeed, the FTCR device doubled the relative lung bioavailability and minimized the unwanted oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled salbutamol. In practice, these pMDI trainers would complement and maintain VT. Study Registration: The study was registered on the ISRCTN registry (Reference: ISRCTN88332465-06/12/2017 [Prospectively Registered]).

Model‐based meta‐analysis of salbutamol pharmacokinetics and practical implications for doping control

Salbutamol was included in the prohibited list of the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) in 2004. Although systemic intake is banned, inhalation for asthma is permitted but with dosage restrictions. The WADA established a urinary concentration threshold to distinguish accordingly prohibited systemic self‐administration from therapeutic prescription by inhalation. This study aimed at evaluating the ability of the WADA threshold to differentiate salbutamol therapeutic use from violation of antidoping rules. Concentration‐time profile of salbutamol in plasma and its excretion in urine was characterized through a model‐based meta‐analysis of individual and aggregate data collected after administration of a large range of doses following different modes of administration and under a variety of conditions. The developed model adequately fitted salbutamol plasma and urine concentration‐time profiles of the 13 selected studies. Model‐based simulations confirmed that a wide range of salbutamol urine concentrations might be measured after drug intake. Although violation of the WADA Code can be strongly suspected in individuals showing very high salbutamol urine concentrations, uncertainty remains for values close to the WADA threshold as they can be compatible with both permitted therapeutic use and violation. Although not entirely discriminant, the current WADA rule is globally supported by our appraisal. It could be further improved by a slight and reasonable adjustment of inhaled daily dosages allowed for therapeutic use. Our model might help antidoping experts in the evaluation of suspected doping cases through confronting the athlete's urine measurements with their allegations about salbutamol treatment.

Nanostructures for drug delivery in respiratory diseases therapeutics: Revision of current trends and its comparative analysis

Respiratory diseases are leading causes of death and disability in developing and developed countries. The burden of acute and chronic respiratory diseases has been rising throughout the world and represents a major problem in the public health system. Acute respiratory diseases include pneumonia, influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS viral infections; while chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and, occupational lung diseases (asbestosis, pneumoconiosis) and other parenchymal lung diseases namely lung cancer and tuberculosis are examples of chronic respiratory diseases. Importantly, chronic respiratory diseases are not curable and treatments for acute pathologies are particularly challenging. For that reason, the integration of nanotechnology to existing drugs or for the development of new treatments potentially benefits the therapeutic goals by making drugs more effective and exhibit fewer undesirable side effects to treat these conditions. Moreover, the integration of different nanostructures enables improvement of drug bioavailability, transport and delivery compared to stand-alone drugs in traditional respiratory therapy. Notably, there has been great progress in translating nanotechnology-based cancer therapies and diagnostics into the clinic; however, researchers in recent years have focused on the application of nanostructures in other relevant pulmonary diseases as revealed in our database search. Furthermore, polymeric nanoparticles and micelles are the most studied nanostructures in a wide range of diseases; however, liposomal nanostructures are recognized to be some of the most successful commercial drug delivery systems. In conclusion, this review presents an overview of the recent and relevant research in drug delivery systems for the treatment of different pulmonary diseases and outlines the trends, limitations, importance and application of nanomedicine technology in treatment and diagnosis and future work in this field.

Lung deposition of inhaled once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonists via standard jet nebulizer or dry powder inhaler, measured using functional respiratory imaging, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background:

Data for bronchodilator deposition via nebulizers and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited. We used functional respiratory imaging (FRI) to determine deposition patterns for revefenacin solution via a PARI LC^® Sprint^® nebulizer and tiotropium powder via HandiHaler^® DPI.

Methods:

Ten patients with COPD, of whom 9 had severe airflow obstruction, were selected from FLUIDDA’s database. The study did not enroll patients. Drug deposition in the extrathoracic and intrathoracic regions, including the central and peripheral airways was simulated by FRI. The percentage of delivered dose and central-to-peripheral (C/P) deposition ratio for nebulizer and DPI were evaluated.

Results:

Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 64.7 ± 7.1 years, height was 168.8 ± 8.5 cm, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 40.8 ± 12.3%; 50% of patients were men. At optimal inhalation flow, intrathoracic and peripheral deposition was three-fold higher for revefenacin via nebulizer than tiotropium via HandiHaler (mean ± SD 34.6 ± 8.53% versus 10.9 ± 5.67% and 18.2 ± 4.30% versus 5.8 ± 2.73% of delivered dose, respectively). Similar results were observed for suboptimal flow (mean ± SD percentage of revefenacin versus tiotropium: intrathoracic, 32.1 ± 8.3% versus 15.1 ± 5.9%; peripheral; 16.6 ± 4.1% versus 8.4 ± 2.9%). The C/P deposition ratio for nebulizer was similar to DPI (mean ± SD 0.915 ± 0.241 versus 0.812 ± 0.249 at optimal; 0.947 ± 0.253 versus 0.784 ± 0.219 at suboptimal flow), even though the mass median aerodynamic diameter of revefenacin was higher than tiotropium. C/P deposition ratio for revefenacin decreased after bronchodilation (0.915 ± 0.241 pre-bronchodilation versus 0.799 ± 0.192 post-bronchodilation), suggesting progressively better deposition in the peripheral region, assuming bronchodilation occurred during the nebulization process.

Conclusions:

These results demonstrate more efficient intrathoracic and peripheral deposition for revefenacin via standard jet nebulizer than tiotropium via HandiHaler, with similar C/P deposition ratio in patients with COPD. Nebulizers are an efficient alternative to DPIs for bronchodilator administration in patients with COPD.

Aerosol drug-delivery and short-term clinical outcomes of suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AIM OF WORK

Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) is highly prevalent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients owing to the mismatch of their own PIFR with the corresponding inhaler-device resistance. This study aimed to evaluate aerosol drug-delivery and short-term clinical outcomes of suboptimal PIFR in COPD subjects.

METHODS

Twenty optimal and suboptimal COPD subjects were crossed over in this prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label study. They were tested for urinary salbutamol amount (USAL30) and spirometric response 30 min poststudy dose (200 µg salbutamol) through Aerolizer^® and Handihaler^® after assessment of their own PIFR through In-Check™ Dial G16. Urine samples were extracted through solid-phase extraction and assayed through a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.

RESULTS

Mean USAL30 was significantly higher in the optimal group than in the suboptimal group (P = .001). There was no significant difference in ΔFEV1% predicted and ΔFVC% predicted between optimal and suboptimal groups, with higher values in optimal Aerolizer^® and Handihaler^® than in suboptimal groups.

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal PIFR was associated with a significantly lower drug delivery in COPD subjects at hospital discharge, and a slightly lower pulmonary function response 30 min postbronchodilation if compared with optimal PIFR.

In vitro Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of the effect of glycerol on the uptake of beclomethasone dipropionate in living respiratory cells

The quantification of drug in living cells is of increasing interest in pharmaceutical research because of its importance in understanding drug efficacy and toxicity. Label-free in situ measurement methods are advantageous for their ability to obtain chemical and time profiles without the need of labelling or extraction steps. We have previously shown that Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has the potential to quantify drug in situ within living cells at micromolar level when a simple solution of drug was added to the medium. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the approach can evaluate more complex systems such as the effect of membrane modification by a formulation on drug uptakes. The inhaled corticosteroid, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), in Calu-3 respiratory epithelial cells in the absence and presence of glycerol, an excipient in some inhaled medicines was used as the model system. The FTIR method was first validated for limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) according to published guidelines and the LOQ was found to be ∼ 20 μM, good enough to quantify BDP in the living cell. The uptake of BDP by living Calu-3 cells was found to be reduced in the presence of glycerol as expected due to the stiffening of the cell membrane by the presence of glycerol in the formulation. This study demonstrates the valuable analytical capability of live-cell FTIR to study the effect of formulation on drug transport in lungs and to evaluate drug availability to intracellular targets. We conclude that FTIR has potential to contribute widely at the frontier of live-cell studies.

Effect of different accessory devices on the dose delivered from pressurised metred-dose inhalers

INTRODUCTIONS

Improved aerosol delivery of bronchodilators to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects is a cornerstone in the treatment approach. Drug delivery and response are improved with the use of accessory devices [spacers and valved holding chambers (VHCs)] with metred-dose inhalers (pMDIs). However, different accessory devices are available in the market with different properties that could affect aerosol delivery. Thus, this study aimed to assess the relative lung deposition and systemic bioavailability and compare bronchodilator response of salbutamol delivered using different accessory devices attached to pMDIs.

METHODS

Twelve healthy subjects and twelve COPD subjects inhaled 300 μg salbutamol (3 pMDI puffs) using five different accessory devices with either masks or mouthpieces (Able, Aerochamber plus flow Vu, Dolphin chamber, Tipshaler spacer, and modified Drink bottle spacer). Urine samples were collected thirty minutes post-dosing and cumulatively for the next twenty-four hours, to determine and compare the relative lung deposition [0-0.5 hour excretion of urinary salbutamol (USAL0.5)] and systemic bioavailability [0.5-24 hours excretion of urinary salbutamol (USAL24)] of salbutamol from the selected accessory devices. Also, the difference between pre and post-inhalation forced expiratory volume in one second (ΔFEV₁ %) of predicted was determined for each accessory device.

RESULTS

Urinary excretion of salbutamol (both USAL0.5 and USAL24 samples) in COPD subjects was significantly (P < .05) lower than in healthy subjects for all accessory devices. USAL0.5 and USAL24 in non-antistatic spacers (modified Drink bottle spacer and Dolphin chamber spacers) were significantly lower (P < .05) than that for antistatic spacers (Aerochamber plus flow Vu, Able and Tips-haler). No significant difference in USAL0.5 and USAL24 was observed between facemasks and mouthpieces. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in ΔFEV₁ % of predicted values between COPD subjects and healthy subjects. However, within the COPD group and the healthy group there was no significant difference in ΔFEV₁ % of predicted values between all accessory devices or between with mouthpiece or with a mask.

CONCLUSIONS

COPD subjects had lower aerosol delivered compared with healthy subjects. Anti-static accessory devices delivered a higher amount of aerosol compared with non-antistatic accessory devices. Even though the presence of a significant difference in aerosol delivery between non-antistatic and antistatic accessory devices no significant difference was found in the ΔFEV₁ % between all accessory devices.

Status of inhalable antimicrobial agents for lung infection: progress and prospects

Introduction: Available parenteral and oral administration of antimicrobial agents (AMAs) in respiratory infections often show less penetration into the lung parenchyma. Due to inappropriate dose availability, the rate of antibiotic resistance is increasing gradually. Inhaled antibiotics intensely improve the availability of drugs at the site of respiratory infections. This targeted delivery minimizes systemic exposure and associated toxicity.Area covers: This review was performed by searching in the scientific database like PubMed and several trusted government sites like fda.gov, cdc.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov, etc. For better understanding, AMAs are classified in different stages of approval. Mechanism and characterization of pulmonary drug deposition section helps to understand the effective delivery of AMAs to the respiratory tract. There is a need for proper adoption of delivery devices for inhalable AMAs. Thus, delivery devices are extensively explained. Inspiratory flow has a remarkable impact on the delivery device that has been explained in detail.Expert opinion: Pulmonary delivery restricts the bulk administration of drugs in comparison with other routes. Therefore, novel AMAs with higher bactericidal activity at lower concentrations need to be synthesized. Extensive research is indeed in developing innovative delivery devices that would able to deliver higher doses of AMAs through the pulmonary route.

Laryngeal Injury Due to Amikacin Inhalation for Refractory Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection

Inhaled antibiotics have long been used for chronic lung infections, especially in patients with cystic fibrosis and increasingly for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) has emerged as a promising treatment for Mycobacterium avium complex infection refractory to oral antibiotics. However, despite its efficacy, nearly one-half of patients in phase II and III trials experienced dysphonia as a treatment-associated adverse effect. Here, we describe a patient who experienced severe, acute-onset laryngitis while receiving ALIS for refractory M avium complex infection, prompting discontinuation of ALIS therapy. This is the first report directly describing vocal fold injury due to such therapy. Given the high frequency of dysphonia reported with ALIS, this case highlights the potential severity of laryngeal toxicity, the importance of coordination of care for patients receiving inhaled antibiotics for chronic pulmonary disease, and the need for better insight into mechanisms of toxicity.

Application of aerosol therapy in respiratory diseases in children: A Saudi expert consensus

The Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association (SPPA) is a subsidiary of the Saudi Thoracic Society (STS), which consists of a group of Saudi experts with well-respected academic and clinical backgrounds in the fields of asthma and other respiratory diseases. The SPPA Expert Panel realized the need to draw up a clear, simple to understand, and easy to use guidance regarding the application of different aerosol therapies in respiratory diseases in children, due to the high prevalence and high economic burden of these diseases in Saudi Arabia. This statement was developed based on the available literature, new evidence, and experts' practice to come up with such consensuses about the usage of different aerosol therapies for the management of respiratory diseases in children (asthma and nonasthma) in different patient settings, including outpatient, emergency room, intensive care unit, and inpatient settings. For this purpose, SPPA has initiated and formed a national committee which consists of experts from concerned specialties (pediatric pulmonology, pediatric emergency, clinical pharmacology, pediatric respiratory therapy, as well as pediatric and neonatal intensive care). These committee members are from different healthcare sectors in Saudi Arabia (Ministry of Health, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Education, and private healthcare sector). In addition to that, this committee is representing different regions in Saudi Arabia (Eastern, Central, and Western region). The subject was divided into several topics which were then assigned to at least two experts. The authors searched the literature according to their own strategies without central literature review. To achieve consensus, draft reports and recommendations were reviewed and voted on by the whole panel.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approaches to drug delivery design for inhalation drugs

Introduction: Inhaled drugs are important in the treatment of many lung pathologies, but to be therapeutically effective they must reach unbound concentrations at their effect site in the lung that are adequate to interact with their pharmacodynamic properties (PD) and exert the pharmacological action over an appropriate dosing interval. Therefore, the evaluation of pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD relationship is critical to predict their possible therapeutic effect.Areas covered: We review the approaches used to assess the PK/PD relationship of the major classes of inhaled drugs that are prescribed to treat pulmonary pathologies.Expert opinion: There are still great difficulties in producing data on lung concentrations of inhaled drugs and interpreting them as to their ability to induce the desired therapeutic action. The structural complexity of the lungs, the multiplicity of processes involved simultaneously and the physical interactions between the lungs and drug make any PK/PD approach to drug delivery design for inhalation medications extremely challenging. New approaches/methods are increasing our understanding about what happens to inhaled drugs, but they are still not ready for regulatory purposes. Therefore, we must still rely on plasma concentrations based on the axiom that they reflect both the extent and the pattern of deposition within the lungs.

Consistent Pulmonary Drug Delivery with Whole Lung Deposition Using the Aerosphere Inhaler: A Review of the Evidence

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are one of the most common device types for delivering inhaled therapies. However, there are several technical challenges in development and drug delivery of these medications. In particular, suspension-based MDIs are susceptible to suspension heterogeneity, in vitro drug–drug interactions, and patient handling errors, which may all affect drug delivery. To overcome these challenges, new formulation approaches are required. The Aerosphere^TM inhaler, formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, combines drug crystals with porous phospholipid particles to create stable, homogenous suspensions that dissolve once they reach the airways. Two combination therapies using this technology have been developed for the treatment of COPD: glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF MDI; dual combination) and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF MDI; triple combination). Here, we review the evidence with a focus on studies assessing dose delivery, lung deposition, and effects on airway geometry. In vitro assessments have demonstrated that the Aerosphere inhaler provides consistent dose delivery, even in the presence of simulated patient handling errors. Combination therapies delivered with this technology also show a consistent fine particle fraction (FPF) and an optimal particle size distribution for delivery to the central and peripheral airways even when multiple drugs are delivered via the same inhaler. Studies using gamma scintigraphy and functional respiratory imaging have demonstrated that GFF MDI is effectively deposited in the central and peripheral airways, and provides clinically meaningful benefits on airway volume and resistance throughout the lung. Overall, studies suggest that the Aerosphere inhaler, formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, may offer advantages over traditional formulations, including consistent delivery of multiple components across patient handling conditions, optimal particle size and FPF, and effective delivery to the central and peripheral airways. Future studies may provide additional evidence to further characterize the clinical benefits of these technical improvements in MDI drug delivery.

A new formulation of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in a metered-dose inhaler (MDI HFA) allows for the reduction of a daily dose of corticosteroid and provides optimal asthma control - A randomized, multi-center, non-inferiority, phase IV clinical study

BACKGROUND

Improvement of the delivery method of inhaled corticosteroids and subsequent dose reduction can minimize the risk of unfavorable outcomes while providing optimal asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, multi-center, non-inferiority, phase IV clinical study compared the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250 μg/50 μg, twice daily) administered in a metered-dose inhaler hydrofluoroalkane (MDI HFA) with a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) containing fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (500 μg/50 μg, twice daily).

METHODS

Adults with asthma (n = 231) were randomly assigned to either the study group (treated for 12 weeks with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDI HFA) or a control group (treated for 12 weeks with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol DPI). Asthma symptoms, exacerbations, short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) use, physical activity, lung function, and general health status were assessed during four study visits.

RESULTS

Compared with the reference drug, the study drug decreased the incidence of daytime and night-time asthma symptoms, asthma exacerbations, self-administration of SABA, and the limitation of physical activity. Comparable improvement in peak expiratory flow ([MDI HFA] from 6.2 ± 0.2 to 6.6 ± 0.2 l/s vs. [DPI] from 6.0 ± 0.2 to 6.9 ± 0.2 l/s; p > 0.05), forced expiratory volume in one second, and forced vital capacity were obtained in both groups. Significantly lower incidence of hoarseness was observed in the study group ([MDI HFA] 0.0% vs. [DPI] 2.8%; p = 0.0267); no major differences were found for other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250 μg/50 μg, twice daily) MDI HFA provides optimal asthma control and is non-inferior to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (500 μg/50 μg, twice daily) DPI.

Effectiveness of Spacer Devices on Preventing Undesirable Cardiovascular Effects of Inhaled Salbutamol

Background: Currently, there are no regulatory guidelines indicating spacer devices/valved holding chamber (VHC) should be used routinely during pulmonary function tests, and few studies evaluated if spacer devices reduce beta-agonist bronchodilators' side effects. Methods: A prospective study compared salbutamol's cardiovascular effects and bronchodilation response during spirometry tests with and without a spacer device/VHC. Heart rate (HR), the corrected QT interval (QTc), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured 10 minutes after the first spirometry test, before the drug administration, and 20 minutes after inhalation in both groups. Spirometric parameters (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], and FEV1/FVC) were also measured for both groups. Results: HR and QTc increase were significantly higher in the pressurized meter dose inhalers alone group versus the VHC group [mean SD] [73.1 ± 10 bpm to 74.3 + 10 bpm, p = 0.021] and [median (25%-75% interquartile range)] [389 ms (381-404) to 398 ms (387-407), p = 0.045] vs. [mean SD] [75.4 ± 9 to 73.8 + 8 bpm, p = 0.4] and [median (25%-75% interquartile range)] [388 ms (347-408) to 385 ms (366-408), p = 0.35], respectively. FEV1 variation before and after salbutamol were similar between both groups. Discussion: Although VHC significantly reduces HR and QTc variation when using beta-agonist bronchodilators in healthy patients, no clinical repercussions of this variation were found in this study, since no event of tachycardia or pathological QTc was recorded. Conclusion: VHC has a diminished clinical impact for healthy patients when considering cardiovascular effects and spirometric parameters. Beta-agonist bronchodilators may be administrated despite the use of spacer devices in patients without known cardiovascular diseases. Its significance for other populations still needs to be determined.

An in vitro bioassay for evaluating the effect of inhaled bronchodilators on airway smooth muscle

PURPOSE

The development of inhaled drug products is expensive and involves time-consuming pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. There are few in vitro cell-based assays to evaluate the disposition and action of orally inhaled drugs to guide early product development and minimise risk. The aim of the present study was to develop a co-culture bioassay, combining an airway epithelial cell line (Calu-3) with cultured human primary airway smooth muscle cells (ASM), integrated with apparatus to deliver pharmaceutical aerosols.

METHODS

An assay for measuring cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in ASM derived from healthy donors was adapted to provide a biochemical surrogate for ASM relaxation. Concentration-response curves for cAMP were established for three drugs that elicit ASM relaxation: isoprenaline (ISO), forskolin (FOR) and salbutamol sulphate. The ASM bioassay was incorporated into a co-culture model in which air-interfaced Calu-3 cell layers, representing the permeability barrier of the airway epithelium, were grown on transwell inserts above ASM cells cultured in the well of the base-plate. The sensitivity of this bioassay to salbutamol delivered using different formulations and aerosol products was evaluated.

RESULTS

ASM responded with concentration dependent increases in cAMP when exposed to 10^-9 to 10^-5 M ISO, FOR or salbutamol sulphate solutions for 15 or 30 min. Salbutamol formulated with different counter ions elicited differential cAMP responses in ASM (xinafoate > base = sulphate) suggesting that this bioassay could discriminate between formulations with different potency. A similar rank order of potency was observed for the different salbutamol salts when applied as aerosols to the co-culture model.

DISCUSSION

We have developed a novel bioassay using human ASM in co-culture with human respiratory epithelial cells to better mimic various elements that contribute to the rate and extent of local drug availability in the lungs following topical administration. The bioassay offers an opportunity to investigate the factors determining the activity of inhaled bronchodilator drugs in a more biologically relevant system than that has previously been described and with further development and validation, this novel bioassay could provide a method to guide the more efficient development of inhaled bronchodilators, reducing the current reliance on in vivo studies.

Direct Delivery of MicroRNA96 to the Lungs Reduces Progression of Sugen/Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in the Rat

The 5HT1B receptor (5HT1BR) contributes to the pathogenic effects of serotonin in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Here, we determine the effect of a microRNA96 (miR96) mimic delivered directly to the lungs on development of severe pulmonary hypertension in rats. Female rats were dosed with sugen (30 mg/kg) and subjected to 3 weeks of hypobaric hypoxia. In normoxia, rats were dosed with either a 5HT1BR antagonist SB216641 (7.5 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks), miR96, or scramble sequence (50 μg per rat), delivered by intratracheal (i.t) administration, once a week for 3 weeks. Cardiac hemodynamics were determined, pulmonary vascular remodeling was assessed, and gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR, and in situ hybridization and protein expression were assessed by western blot and ELISA. miR96 expression was increased in pulmonary arteries and associated with a downregulation of the 5HT1BR protein in the lung. miR96 reduced progression of right ventricular systolic pressure, pulmonary arterial remodeling, right ventricular hypertrophy, and the occurrence of occlusive pulmonary lesions. Importantly, miR96 had no off-target effects and did not affect fibrotic markers of liver and kidney function. In conclusion, direct delivery of miR96 to the lungs was effective, reducing progression of sugen/hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension with no measured off-target effects. miR96 may be a novel therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension, acting through downregulation of 5HT1BR.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of salbutamol inhaled from a pressurized metered dose inhaler either alone or connected to a newly enhanced spacer design

BACKGROUND

Coordination between actuation of a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and inhalation is a critical manoeuvre that many patients fail to perform correctly. pMDIs connected to spacers do not require hand-lung coordination. This study evaluated the relative lung and systemic bioavailability and oropharyngeal deposition of salbutamol post-inhalation from Ventolin® Evohaler® (GlaxoSmithKline) either alone following verbal inhaler technique counselling (VC) or connected to a newly improved Able Spacer® (AS).

METHODS

In a two-period, randomized crossover study, 16 healthy adults inhaled 2 × 100 µg salbutamol puffs (1 min gap) from Ventolin using VC or AS. Immediately after each puff inhalation, each subject gargled with 20 mL water for oropharyngeal deposition (OD) determination. Urine samples were collected 0.5 h (pre-) and 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 h post-inhalation. Urine was then pooled 2-24 h post-inhalation. The relative lung bioavailability (0-0.5 h urinary salbutamol excretion - USAL0.5) and systemic bioavailability (0-24 h urinary excretion of salbutamol and its metabolite - USALMET24) were determined. A one week washout separated VC and AS use.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) USAL0.5 of VC and AS was 5.36 (4.48) and 12.80 (10.83) µg, respectively. The mean (SD) OD was 11.35 (3.37) and 0.48 (0.30) µg, respectively. VC and AS were significantly different in USAL0.5 and OD (p<0.001). USALMET24 was comparable (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VC, AS doubled the inhaled salbutamol lung dose and minimised its precipitation in the oral cavity. The results suggest this inhalation aid can add therapeutic and safety benefits particularly in patients with continued pMDI technique issues despite repeated VC.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a novel extrafine BDP/FF/GB combination delivered via metered-dose inhaler in healthy Chinese subjects

BACKGROUND

BDP/FF/GB pMDI is a novel triple fixed-dose combination of extra-fine inhalation aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol fumarate (FF)/glycopyrronium bromide (GB). Limited data on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of BDP/FF/GB fixed-dose combination in healthy subjects was available.

PURPOSES

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of BDP/FF/GB pMDI in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

This is an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, single and multiple dose study. In the single dose group, subjects received single supra-therapeutic inhaled dose of BDP/FF/GB pMDI (BDP/FF/GB 400/24/50 µg). In the multiple dose group, subjects received therapeutic inhaled dose of BDP/FF/GB pMDI (BDP/FF/GB 200/12/25 µg), twice daily, for 7 consecutive days. Plasma BDP, B17MP, formoterol and GB were determined by a validated ultra performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometric detection (UPLC/MS-MS). Heart rate (HR), QTcF, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were evaluated as the surrogate indicators of pharmacodynamic effects.

RESULTS

A total of 24 subjects were randomized and 22 (11 in each group) completed the study. The dose adjusted pharmacokinetic profiles of BDP, beclomethasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP, the most active metabolite of BDP), formoterol and GB were overall similar in therapeutic and supra- therapeutic dose group, showing dose proportional increase of the systemic exposure to BDP, B17MP, formoterol and GB. The pharmacodynamic variables were within the normal range and showed no significant difference between the two groups. All the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild and no severe TEAE was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose adjusted PK profiles were similar between therapeutic and supra-therapeutic dose for all compounds, nearly dose proportional systemic exposure to B17MP, formoterol and GB after BDP/FF/GB pMDI administration in healthy Chinese subjects. BDP/FF/GB pMDI was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. The PK profiles were comparable to previously published data from Western European healthy Caucasian subjects.

Evaluation of patients' real-world post-dispensing use and storage environments of tiotropium bromide Respimat® soft mist inhaler on its in vitro dose delivery and lung deposition

BACKGROUND

Oral inhalation is the main drug delivery route for treating obstructive lung conditions. Thus, many inhaler devices with various design and pharmaceutical formulation have been introduced. The fine particle dose (FPD) and mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD ≤ 5 μm) of the aerosol delivered dose (DD) dictate the therapeutically effective peripheral lung deposition. This study evaluated the in vitro aerosol emission performance of tiotropium bromide emitted from Spiriva® Respimat® soft mist inhalers (R) after living under patients' real-world, post-dispensing handling environments.

METHODS

This was a two-stage investigation. In the first clinical stage, research ethical approval was obtained to enrol patients already been using R for at least 3 months. Those who signed consent were given both new R to use and temperature and relative humidity (RH) handheld, portable data loggers to keep in the vicinity of the given R. The participants returned the given R and data loggers after 2 weeks. Patient recruitment took place in Amman, Jordan, during the summer (RS) and winter (RW). Subsequently, in the second laboratory stage, other R were strictly stored at an average of 21.0 °C and 46.9% RH as control (RC). The Next Generation Impactor (NGI) was used to evaluate the RS, RW and RC. The NGI was operated at a flow rate of 30 L/min.

RESULTS

The RS were exposed to an average (range) 23.6 °C (18.2-37.5 °C) and 43.8% RH (21.4-60.0% RH) that were statistically comparable (p > 0.05) to that of the RW; 17.3 °C (13.2-26.7 °C) and 52.8% RH (26.3-69.1% RH). The RW and RC retention environments were statistically different (p < 0.05), whilst the RS and RC had comparable (p > 0.05) conditions. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in the tiotropium bromide DD (2.39 vs 2.43 μg), FPD (0.88 vs 0.90 μg) and MMAD (5.1 vs 4.98 μm) between the RS and RW, respectively. Compared to the RC inhalers, both the RS and RW devices had significantly higher FPD and relatively smaller tiotropium bromide particles.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the R under the fluctuating summer and winter environments of our patients would not affect its overall tiotropium bromide emission performance. The significant increase in the respirable mass of the RS and RW might be offset by the increase in particles <1 μm particularly in patients with poor inhaler technique.

Evaluation of systemic absorption and bronchodilator effect of glycopyrronium bromide delivered by nebulizer or a dry powder inhaler in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Effective bronchodilator therapy depends upon adequate drug deposition in the lung. COPD patients who are unable to administer medications efficiently with conventional inhalers may benefit from the use of a nebulizer device. The aim of this study was to evaluate the systemic bioavailability and bronchodilator response of glycopyrronium bromide (GLY) administered by a novel nebulizer (eFlow® closed system [CS] vibrating membrane nebulizer) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) in subjects with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

In this randomized, open-label, single-dose, five-way crossover study, subjects received a sequence of either 50 μg GLY delivered by eFlow CS nebulizer (GLY/eFlow) or 63 μg GLY delivered by DPI (GLY/DPI), with and without activated charcoal, followed by intravenous infusion of 50 μg GLY with a washout period of 7 days between doses. Endpoints included plasma pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy.

Results

The mean (± SD) baseline predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) of the 30 subjects who completed the study was 51 ± 15%, with a FEV₁/forced vital capacity ratio of 50 ± 11%. Without charcoal, the absolute systemic bioavailability of GLY/eFlow and GLY/DPI were approximately 15 and 22%, respectively. Changes from baseline in FEV₁ at 60 min post-dose, without administration of charcoal, were 0.180 L and 0.220 L for GLY/eFlow and GLY/DPI, respectively; FEV₁ improvements were similar when charcoal was administered (0.220 L for both GLY/eFlow and GLY/DPI). There were no significant differences in spirometry between the two devices. Fewer subjects administered GLY/eFlow reported adverse events (n = 15) than GLY/DPI (n = 18).

Conclusions

After single doses, GLY/DPI delivered numerically higher peak and steady state levels of drug than did GLY/eFlow. Nebulized GLY produced similar bronchodilation but lower systemic levels of drug than GLY/DPI. Slightly higher number of subjects reported adverse events with GLY/DPI than with GLY/eFlow. Nebulized GLY may offer an effective alternative to patients with COPD not adequately treated with other devices.

Trial registration

NCT02512302 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Registered 28 May 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1113-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Delivered Lung Dose and Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution of Salbutamol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler After Living Under Patients' Realistic Retention Environments

Background: The impact of inhalers' postdispensing, real-life temperature and relative humidity (RH) environments on their delivered dose (DD) and aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) is usually overlooked. This work evaluated the salbutamol DD and APSD of Ventolin^® Evohaler^® (V) inhalers already been used and stored by respiratory patients. Methods: Adult patients, prescribed V for ≥3 months before study enrollment, were dispensed both new V to use and portable, handheld electronic temperature and RH data loggers to keep close to the given V before returning them both after 2-3 weeks. Patients' enrollment took place during summer (VS) and winter (VW) seasons. The returned V was then in vitro evaluated using the Next Generation Impactor, and compared with control V (VC) counterparts stored under 21°C and 46% RH. Results: The VS survived in fluctuating habitats of 21.2°C-40.4°C and 16.2%-63.2% RH, which significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the salbutamol DD from 80.4 to 70.5 μg compared with VC. This 12.3% DD reduction was accompanied with a decrease in the fine particle dose from 26.2 to 20.4 μg (p < 0.05), and an increase in the mass median aerodynamic diameter from 2.3 to 2.5 μm (p < 0.05). The VW and VC had equivalent DD and APSD. Conclusion: Patients using V are expected to receive smaller lung doses during the hot summer season compared with intentionally well-kept VC. To have equivalent lung deposition, V users should be advised to retain their inhalers around 20°C with minimal daily environmental fluctuations during summer times.

Easyhaler®: an overview of an inhaler device for day-to-day use in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhalation therapy is likely to continue to dominate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment. The pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) accounts for most of the global inhaler market, but this kind of device is difficult to use properly. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have several advantages over pMDIs: they are breath-activated, easy and convenient to use, and environmentally friendly. The Easyhaler^® (Orion; Finland) is a multidose reservoir-type DPI developed to efficiently deliver a wide range of medications, including fixed-dose combinations of bronchodilators and corticosteroids. Easyhaler shares a similar shape with the pMDI, and its performance is unaffected by moisture, dropping, vibration, and freezing/thawing. For these reasons, Easyhaler may be considered one of the most convenient inhalers for daily use in patients with asthma or COPD.

Estimation of Fraction Dissolved After Intratracheal Delivery of a Potent Janus Kinase Inhibitor, iJAK-001, with Low Solubility in Rat and Sheep: Impact of Preclinical PKPD on Inhaled Human Dose Projection

Background: A highly potent pan-Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with excellent kinome selectivity was developed for topical delivery to treat severe asthma. This poorly soluble drug discovery candidate, iJAK-001, is expected to exhibit long duration of JAK/STAT pathway inhibition at low doses in asthmatics because of depot effect after dry powder inhalation. Human dose projection for inhaled molecules with low aqueous solubility remains to be a daunting challenge because of several limitations: (1) bioanalytical measurement of dissolved fraction after inhalation of solid particles is uncertain; (2) distribution of these particles is not homogenous in the lung; (3) in vitro solubility measurements to estimate fraction dissolved may not be a reflection of local surface lung concentration; (4) lack of a surrogate biomarker of lung target engagement, and (5) invasive procedure needed to sample human lung tissue in the clinic. Methods: We leveraged in silico, in vitro, and in vivo tools preclinically and found significant differences in lung to plasma partition ratio when iJAK-001 was given intravenously (IV) or intratracheally in a solution-based formulation versus that in suspension, as well as pharmacodynamic response in preclinical asthma models when delivered systemically via IV infusion versus inhaled. Results and Conclusion: The combined results from above suggest that caution must be exercised using either lung or plasma exposure for human dose projection. Instead, using the local inhibitor concentration estimate based on delivery efficiency, dose, fraction absorbed, and rate of absorption normalized by lung (cardiac) blood flow may be more appropriate for dose projection.

A new hypothesis to investigate bioequivalence of pharmaceutical inhalation products

BACKGROUND

This short communication reports a new hypothesis regarding bioequivalence of inhalation products which can potentially provide a reliable means to compare pharmaceutical aerosol formulations and inhalers.

METHODS

Available methods regarding the bioequivalence studies, inhaled drugs and advantages of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples were reviewed to develop this hypothesis.

RESULTS

It is postulated that two inhalation products providing the same drug concentrations in airway lining fluid (ALF) could be considered bioequivalent. The use of EBC tests which reflect ALF composition can be recommended as an alternative to current testing methods for consideration of bioequivalence.

CONCLUSION

The methods based on EBC analysis can potentially be applied to bioequivalence study of inhalation products and could reflect drug concentration in ALF. However, experimental studies would be necessary to support or refute this hypothesis on the novel application of EBC to bioequivalence in the future. Graphical abstract In vitro (cascade impactor) and In vivo (EBC concentration) corrolation for inhaled drugs.

Particle size and gastrointestinal absorption influence tiotropium pharmacokinetics: a pilot bioequivalence study of PUR0200 and Spiriva HandiHaler

AIMS

Plasma pharmacokinetics permit the assessment of efficacy and safety of inhaled drugs, and possibly their bioequivalence to other inhaled products. Correlating drug product attributes to lung deposited dose is important to achieving equivalence. PUR0200 is a spray-dried formulation of tiotropium that enables more efficient lung delivery than Spiriva^® HandiHaler^® (HH). The ratio of tiotropium lung-to-oral deposition in PUR0200 was varied to investigate the impact of particle size on tiotropium pharmacokinetics, and the contribution of oral absorption to tiotropium exposure was assessed using charcoal block.

METHODS

A seven-period, single-dose, crossover study was performed in healthy subjects. PUR0200 formulations differing in dose and aerodynamic particle size were administered in five periods and Spiriva HH in two periods. In one period, Spiriva HH gastrointestinal absorption was blocked with oral charcoal. Tiotropium plasma concentrations were assessed over 8 h after inhalation.

RESULTS

PUR0200 pharmacokinetics were influenced by aerodynamic particle size and the ratio of lung-to-oral deposition, with impactor sized mass (ISM) correlating most strongly with exposure. Formulation PUR0217a (3 μg tiotropium) lung deposition was similar to Spiriva HH (18 μg) with and without charcoal block, but total PUR0200 exposure was lower without charcoal. The C_max and AUC_0-0.5h of Spiriva HH with and without charcoal block were bioequivalent; however, Spiriva HH AUC_0-8h was lower when gastrointestinal absorption was inhibited with oral charcoal administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence indicative of lung deposition and efficacy can be achieved by matching the reference product ISM. Due to reduced oral deposition and more efficient lung delivery, PUR0200 results in a lower AUC_0-t than Spiriva HH due to reduced absorption of drug from the gastrointestinal tract.

100 Years of Drug Delivery to the Lungs

Inhalation therapy is one of the oldest approaches to the therapy of diseases of the respiratory tract. It is well recognised today that the most effective and safe means of treating the lungs is to deliver drugs directly to the airways. Surprisingly, the delivery of therapeutic aerosols has a rich history dating back more than 2,000 years to Ayurvedic medicine in India, but in many respects, the introduction of the first pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in 1956 marked the beginning of the modern pharmaceutical aerosol industry. The pMDI was the first truly portable and convenient inhaler that effectively delivered drug to the lung and quickly gained widespread acceptance. Since 1956, the pharmaceutical aerosol industry has experienced dramatic growth. The signing of the Montreal Protocol in 1987 to reduce the use of CFCs as propellants for aerosols led to a surge in innovation that resulted in the diversification of inhaler technologies with significantly enhanced delivery efficiency, including modern pMDIs, dry powder inhalers and nebuliser systems. There is also great interest in tailoring particle size to deliver drugs to treat specific areas of the respiratory tract. One challenge that has been present since antiquity still exists, however, and that is ensuring that the patient has access to the medication and understands how to use it effectively. In this article, we will provide a summary of therapeutic aerosol delivery systems from ancient times to the present along with a look to the future.

Inhaled Therapy in Respiratory Disease: The Complex Interplay of Pulmonary Kinetic Processes

The inhalation route is frequently used to administer drugs for the management of respiratory diseases such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Compared with other routes of administration, inhalation offers a number of advantages in the treatment of these diseases. For example, via inhalation, a drug is directly delivered to the target organ, conferring high pulmonary drug concentrations and low systemic drug concentrations. Therefore, drug inhalation is typically associated with high pulmonary efficacy and minimal systemic side effects. The lung, as a target, represents an organ with a complex structure and multiple pulmonary-specific pharmacokinetic processes, including (1) drug particle/droplet deposition; (2) pulmonary drug dissolution; (3) mucociliary and macrophage clearance; (4) absorption to lung tissue; (5) pulmonary tissue retention and tissue metabolism; and (6) absorptive drug clearance to the systemic perfusion. In this review, we describe these pharmacokinetic processes and explain how they may be influenced by drug-, formulation- and device-, and patient-related factors. Furthermore, we highlight the complex interplay between these processes and describe, using the examples of inhaled albuterol, fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and olodaterol, how various sequential or parallel pulmonary processes should be considered in order to comprehend the pulmonary fate of inhaled drugs.

Considerations in establishing bioequivalence of inhaled compounds

INTRODUCTION

Generic inhalers are often perceived as inferior to their branded counterparts; however, they are safe and effective if they can meet the regulatory requirements. The approach to assess bioequivalence (BE) in oral dosage form products is not sufficient to address the complexities of inhalational products (e.g., patient-device interface); hence, more considerations are needed and caution should be applied in determining BE of inhaled compounds.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines the evaluation process for generic inhalers, explores the regulatory approaches in BE assessment, and highlights the considerations and challenges in the current in vitro and in vivo approaches (lung deposition, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic/clinical studies, and patient-device interface) for establishing BE of inhaled compounds.

EXPERT OPINION

The ultimate goals in this field are to establish uniformity in the regulatory approaches to speed the drug submission process in different regions, clear physicians' misconception of generic inhalers, and have meaningful clinical endpoints such as improvement in patient quality of life when compared to placebo and brand name drugs. As inhalational drugs become more common for other indications such as antibiotics, the technologies developed for inhaled compounds in the treatment of chronic pulmonary diseases may be extrapolated to these other agents.

Regulatory Approaches and Considerations in Establishing Bioequivalence of Inhaled Compounds

To be considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts, generic drugs must meet the standards for bioequivalence (BE) described by the regulatory agencies. While BE of generic inhalational drugs can be evaluated using a similar approach as that for oral dosage from products or drugs that are delivered systemically, the approach is insufficient to address the complexities of inhalational products (e.g., localized site of action, device-patient interface). Therefore, more considerations are needed and caution should be applied when evaluating BE of inhaled compounds. The purpose of this review is to highlight the considerations and challenges in establishing BE of inhaled compounds by (1) outlining the current regulatory approaches (from Health Canada, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency) to assess BE for subsequent entry inhaled products (SEIPs) and (2) reviewing the literature pertaining to testing considerations of SEIPs to establish BE.

Dilemmas, Confusion, and Misconceptions Related to Small Airways Directed Therapy

During the past decade, there has been increasing evidence that the small airways (ie, airways < 2 mm in internal diameter) contribute substantially to the pathophysiologic and clinical expression of asthma and COPD. The increased interest in small airways is, at least in part, a result of innovation in small-particle aerosol formulations that better target the distal lung and also advanced physiologic methods of assessing small airway responses. Increasing the precision of drug deposition may improve targeting of specific diseases or receptor locations, decrease airway drug exposure and adverse effects, and thereby increase the efficiency and effectiveness of inhaled drug delivery. The availability of small-particle aerosols of corticosteroids, bronchodilators, or their combination enables a higher total lung deposition and better peripheral lung penetration and provides added clinical benefit, compared with large-particle aerosol treatment. However, a number of questions remain unanswered about the pragmatic approach relevant for clinicians to consider the role of small airways directed therapy in the day-to-day management of asthma and COPD. We thus have tried to clarify the dilemmas, confusion, and misconceptions related to small airways directed therapy. To this end, we have reviewed all studies on small-particle aerosol therapy systematically to address the dilemmas, confusion, and misconceptions related to small airways directed therapy.

Patient-specific modeling of regional antibiotic concentration levels in airways of patients with cystic fibrosis: are we dosing high enough?

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infection is an important contributor to the progression of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. The cornerstone treatment for Pa infection is the use of inhaled antibiotics. However, there is substantial lung disease heterogeneity within and between patients that likely impacts deposition patterns of inhaled antibiotics. Therefore, this may result in airways below the minimal inhibitory concentration of the inhaled agent. Very little is known about antibiotic concentrations in small airways, in particular the effect of structural lung abnormalities. We therefore aimed to develop a patient-specific airway model to predict concentrations of inhaled antibiotics and to study the impact of structural lung changes and breathing profile on local concentrations in airways of patients with CF.

Methods

In- and expiratory CT-scans of children with CF (5–17 years) were scored (CF-CT score), segmented and reconstructed into 3D airway models. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations were performed on 40 airway models to predict local Aztreonam lysine for inhalation (AZLI) concentrations. Patient-specific lobar flow distribution and nebulization of 75 mg AZLI through a digital Pari eFlow model with mass median aerodynamic diameter range were used at the inlet of the airway model. AZLI concentrations for central and small airways were computed for different breathing patterns and airway surface liquid thicknesses.

Results

In most simulated conditions, concentrations in both central and small airways were well above the minimal inhibitory concentration. However, small airways in more diseased lobes were likely to receive suboptimal AZLI. Structural lung disease and increased tidal volumes, respiratory rates and larger particle sizes greatly reduced small airway concentrations.

Conclusions

CFD modeling showed that concentrations of inhaled antibiotic delivered to the small airways are highly patient specific and vary throughout the bronchial tree. These results suggest that anti-Pa treatment of especially the small airways can be improved.

Indacaterol determination in human urine: validation of a liquid-liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analytical method

BACKGROUND

Indacaterol is a novel once-a-day inhaled ultra-long-acting β2-agonist. Quantitative bioanalysis supports pharmacokinetic and clinical research. The aim of the current work was to validate an in-house developed high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analytical method for indacaterol determination in human urine samples.

METHODS

A liquid-liquid extraction method has been developed to extract indacaterol from human urine samples using ethyl acetate. Indacaterol dry extract was reconstituted with 200 μL of the mobile phase (acidified water:methanol (30:70, v/v)) of which 5 μL was needed for the HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Indacaterol was eluted on a reversed C18 stationary phase with an isocratic mobile phase at a flow of 1 mL/min. Formoterol was the internal standard (IS). The MS/MS detection was employed with a turbo-ion spray ionization in the positive ion mode. A consensus of the international Guidelines for Bioanalytical Method Validation was followed.

RESULTS

Indacaterol was detected at a mass to charge ratio (m/z) of 393.3 and its MS/MS daughter at 173.2. The retention times of indacaterol and IS were 1.60 and 1.20 min, respectively. Validated calibration curves were linear over a range of 0.075-100 ng/mL with correlation coefficients (r)≥0.990. The curves' regression weighting factor was 1/x. Method specificity was established in six different human urine batches. No matrix interference was observed. The intra- and inter-batch precision and accuracy within±20% (at lower limit) and±15% (other quality control (QC) levels) were confirmed. The indacaterol mean recovery (precision) percentages at Low, Mid, and High QC levels were 93.5 (3.84), 89.8 (2.15), and 92.2 (2.17), respectively. Short-term, long-term, freeze-thaw, and auto-sampler stability results were accepted.

CONCLUSIONS

A specific, accurate and precise HPLC-MS/MS method has been validated for indacaterol quantification in human urine. This simple method is reproducible and robust to support future, indacaterol-related pharmacokinetic, bioequivalence and clinical studies.

Bioequivalence of inhaled drugs: fundamentals, challenges and perspectives

Interest in bioequivalence (BE) of inhaled drugs derives largely from the desire to offer generic substitutes to successful drug products. The complexity of aerosol dosage forms renders them difficult to mimic and raises questions regarding definitions of similarities and those properties that must be controlled to guarantee both the quality and the efficacy of the product. Despite a high level of enthusiasm to identify and control desirable properties there is no clear guidance, regulatory or scientific, for the variety of aerosol dosage forms, on practical measures of BE from which products can be developed. As more data on the pharmaceutical and clinical relevance of various techniques, as described in this review, become available, it is likely that a path to the demonstration of BE will become evident. In the meantime, debate on this topic will continue.

Computational and bioengineered lungs as alternatives to whole animal, isolated organ, and cell-based lung models

Development of lung models for testing a drug substance or delivery system has been an intensive area of research. However, a model that mimics physiological and anatomical features of human lungs is yet to be established. Although in vitro lung models, developed and fine-tuned over the past few decades, were instrumental for the development of many commercially available drugs, they are suboptimal in reproducing the physiological microenvironment and complex anatomy of human lungs. Similarly, intersubject variability and high costs have been major limitations of using animals in the development and discovery of drugs used in the treatment of respiratory disorders. To address the complexity and limitations associated with in vivo and in vitro models, attempts have been made to develop in silico and tissue-engineered lung models that allow incorporation of various mechanical and biological factors that are otherwise difficult to reproduce in conventional cell or organ-based systems. The in silico models utilize the information obtained from in vitro and in vivo models and apply computational algorithms to incorporate multiple physiological parameters that can affect drug deposition, distribution, and disposition upon administration via the lungs. Bioengineered lungs, on the other hand, exhibit significant promise due to recent advances in stem or progenitor cell technologies. However, bioengineered approaches have met with limited success in terms of development of various components of the human respiratory system. In this review, we summarize the approaches used and advancements made toward the development of in silico and tissue-engineered lung models and discuss potential challenges associated with the development and efficacy of these models.

Lung imaging - two dimensional gamma scintigraphy, SPECT, CT and PET

This review will cover the principles of imaging the deposition of inhaled drugs and some of the state-of-the art imaging techniques being used today. Aerosol deposition can be imaged and quantified by the addition of a radiolabel to the aerosol formulation. The subsequent imaging of the inhaled deposition pattern can be acquired by different imaging techniques. Specifically, this review will focus on the use of two-dimensional planar, gamma scintigraphy, SPECT, CT and PET. This review will look at how these imaging techniques are used to investigate the mechanisms of drug delivery in the lung and how the lung anatomy and physiology have the potential to alter therapeutic outcomes.