Fexofenadine-induced QT prolongation: a myth or fact?

Fexofenadine: review of safety, efficacy and unmet needs in children with allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common undiagnosed chronic condition in children. Moderate/severe AR symptoms significantly impair quality of life, and cause sleep disruption, absenteeism and decreased productivity. Additionally, untreated AR predisposes children to asthma and other chronic conditions. Although intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective pharmacologic treatment for AR, oral antihistamines are often preferred. First-generation antihistamines may be chosen to relieve AR symptoms as they are inexpensive and widely available; however, they cause sedative and cardiovascular negative effects due to poor receptor selectivity. Therefore, second-generation antihistamines were developed to reduce adverse effects while retaining efficacy. There are fewer clinical trials in children than adults, therefore, efficacy and safety data is limited, particularly in children under 6 years, highlighting the need to generate these data in young children with AR. Fexofenadine, a highly selective second-generation antihistamine, effectively alleviates symptoms of AR, is non-sedating due to decreased blood-brain barrier permeability, and is devoid of cardiovascular side effects. Importantly, fexofenadine relieves the ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis, which occur concomitantly with AR, improving quality of life. Overall, fexofenadine displays a favorable safety profile and results in greater treatment satisfaction in children compared with other second-generation antihistamines. This review aimed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of fexofenadine with other available first- and second-generation antihistamines in children with AR.

Management of anaphylaxis and allergies in patients with long QT syndrome: A review of the current evidence

OBJECTIVE

To develop a treatment algorithm for patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) in case they need antiallergic medications for allergic reactions, including asthma and anaphylaxis.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was performed to assess safety and to develop antiallergic treatment strategies for patients with LQTS.

STUDY SELECTIONS

LQTS is a heterogeneous group of myocardial repolarization disorders characterized by prolongation of the QT interval that potentially results in life-threatening torsades de pointes tachycardia. Data on pharmacologic treatment in case of anaphylaxis in LQTS are sparse. For this narrative review, all currently available articles on the use of antiallergic drugs for allergic reactions, anaphylaxis, and asthma in patients with LQTS were used.

RESULTS

Local allergic symptoms can be safely treated primarily with fexofenadine, levocetirizine, desloratadine, or cetirizine and, if needed, a short course of corticosteroids. In case of systemic symptoms, epinephrine should be administered. It may be less effective in patients with LQTS treated with β-blockers, necessitating the use of glucagon as add-on treatment. In case of lower airway obstruction, ipratropium bromide should be used, but if not effective, inhaled β₂-adrenergic agents may be used. Continuous cardiac monitoring is indicated with the use of epinephrine and inhaled β₂-adrenergic agents. The use of the latter also warrants intense monitoring of serum potassium levels. Clemastine and dimetindene should be avoided in patients with LQTS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LQTS have a higher risk of life-threatening complications during the treatment of their allergic reactions because of the underlying disease and concomitant treatment with β-blockers. Treatment algorithms will certainly decrease these complications.

Pro-arrhythmic potential of oral antihistamines (H1): combining adverse event reports with drug utilization data across Europe

Background

There is appreciable utilisation of antihistamines (H₁) in European countries, either prescribed by physician and purchased by patients for self-medication. Terfenadine and astemizole underwent regulatory restrictions in ’90 because of their cardiac toxicity, but only scarce clinical data are available on other antihistamines.

Aim

To investigate the pro-arrhythmic potential of antihistamines by combining safety reports of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) with drug utilization data from 13 European Countries.

Methods

We identified signals of antihistamine arrhythmogenic potential by analyzing FAERS database for all cases of Torsades de Pointes (TdP), QT abnormalities (QTabn), ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death/cardiac arrest (SCD/CA). Number of cases ≥3 and disproportionality were used to define alert signals: TdP and QTabn identified stronger signals, whereas SCD/CA identified weaker signals. Drug utilization data from 2005 to 2010 were collected from administrative databases through health authorities and insurance.

Results

Antihistamines were reported in 109 cases of TdP/QT prolongation, 278 VA and 610 SCD/CA. Five agents resulted in stronger signals (cetirizine, desloratadine, diphenhydramine, fexofenadine, loratadine) and 6 in weaker signals (alimemazine, carbinoxamine, cyclizine, cyproeptadine, dexchlorpheniramine and doxylamine). Exposure to antihistamines with stronger signal was markedly different across European countries and was at least 40% in each Country. Cetirizine was >29 Defined Daily Doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) in Norway, desloratadine >11 DID in France and loratadine >9 DID in Sweden and Croatia. Drugs with weaker signals accounted for no more than 10% (in Sweden) and in most European countries their use was negligible.

Conclusions

Some second-generation antihistamines are associated with signal of torsadogenicity and largely used in most European countries. Although confirmation by analytical studies is required, regulators and clinicians should consider risk-minimisation activities. Also antihistamines without signal but with peculiar use in a few Countries (e.g., levocetirizine) or with increasing consumption (e.g., rupatadine) deserve careful surveillance.

Fexofenadine hydrochloride in the treatment of allergic disease: a review

Fexofenadine is a selective, non-sedating H1 receptor antagonist, marketed in the United States since 2000. The FDA approved an oral suspension in 2006, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria in children. The tablet, capsule, and oral suspension are bioequivalent. Although fexofenadine does not use P450 CYP 3A4 it does interact with a number of drugs at P-glycoprotein and organic anion transporter polypeptides. The risk of toxicity from other drugs may increase with the administration of fexofenadine. Orange and grapefruit juices reduce the bioavailability of fexofenadine. Fexofenadine has been shown to have an impact on inflammatory mediators, other than histamine, such as decreasing the production of LTC₄, LTD₄, LTE₄, PGE₂, and PGF_2α; inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase 2, thromboxane; limiting iNOS generation of NO; decreasing cytokine levels (ICAM-1, ELAM-1, VCAM-1, RANTES, I-TAC, MDC, TARC, MMP-2, MMP-9, tryptase); and diminishing eosinophil adherence, chemotaxis, and opsonization of particles. These effects may provide benefit to some of the inflammatory responses of an acute allergic reaction and provide a basis for future development of H1 antagonists with stronger anti-inflammatory effects. These studies also support the contention that fexofenadine is effective for the treatment of allergic rhinits and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Blinded validation of the isolated arterially perfused rabbit ventricular wedge in preclinical assessment of drug-induced proarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

The development of preclinical models with high predictive value for the identification of drugs with a proclivity to induce Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in the clinic has long been a pressing goal of academia, industry and regulatory agencies alike. The present study provides a blinded appraisal of drugs, in an isolated arterially-perfused rabbit ventricular wedge preparation, with and without the potential to produce TdP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirteen compounds were tested for their potential for TdP using the rabbit left ventricular wedges. All investigators were blinded to the names, concentrations and molecular weights of the drugs. The compounds were prepared by the study sponsor and sent to the investigator as 4 sets of 13 stock solutions with the order within each set being assigned by a random number generator. Each compound was scored semi-quantitatively for its relative potential for TdP based on its effect on ventricular repolarization measured as QT interval, dispersion of repolarization measured as T(p-e)/QT ratio and early afterdepolarizations. Disclosure of the names and concentrations after completion of the study revealed that all compounds known to be free of TdP risk received a score of less or equal to 0.25, whereas those with known TdP risk received a score ranging from 1.00 to 7.25 at concentrations less than 100X their free therapeutic plasma C(max).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides a blinded evaluation of the isolated arterially-perfused rabbit wedge preparation demonstrating both a high sensitivity and specificity in the assessment of 13 agents with varying propensity for causing TdP.

The antihistamine fexofenadine does not affect I(Kr) currents in a case report of drug-induced cardiac arrhythmia

1. The human HERG gene encodes the cardiac repolarizing K(+) current I(Kr) and is genetically inactivated in inherited long QT syndrome 2 (LQTS2). The antihistamine terfenadine blocks HERG channels, and can cause QT prolongation and torsades de pointes, whereas its carboxylate fexofenadine lacks HERG blocking activity. 2. In the present study the ability of fexofenadine to block the K897T HERG channel variant was investigated. The underlying single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A2960C was identified in a patient reported to develop fexofenadine-associated LQTS. 3. K897T HERG channels produced wild-type-like currents in Xenopus oocytes. Even at a concentration of 100 micro M, fexofenadine did not inhibit wild-type or K897T HERG channels. Coexpression of wild-type and K897T HERG with the ss-subunit MiRP1, slightly changed current kinetics but did not change sensitivity to terfenadine and fexofenadine. 4. Western blot analysis and immunostaining of transiently transfected COS-7 cells demonstrated that overall expression level, glycosylation pattern and subcellular localization of K897T HERG is indistinguishable from wild-type HERG protein, and not altered in the presence of 1 micro M fexofenadine. 5. We provide the first functional characterization of the K897T HERG variant. We demonstrated that K897T HERG is similar to wild-type HERG, and is insensitive to fexofenadine. Although the polymorphism changes PKA and PKC phosphorylation sites, regulation of K897T HERG by these kinases is not altered. 6. Our results strongly indicate that QT lengthening and cardiac arrhythmia in the reported case of drug-induced LQT are not due to the K897T exchange or to an inhibitory effect of fexofenadine on cardiac I(Kr) currents. British Journal of

Non-antiarrhythmic drugs prolonging the QT interval: considerable use in seven countries

AIMS

Many drugs belonging to different therapeutic classes appear to share a potentially fatal side-effect: ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with QT prolongation. The aim of this study was to assess the relevance and the magnitude of the problem in seven countries by grouping all nonantiarrhythmic drugs according to the type of evidence on QT prolongation and analysing their sales data.

METHODS

We divided all nonantiarrhythmic QT-prolonging agents into the following categories (in increasing order of clinical relevance): group A, drugs with published clinical or preclinical evidence on QT prolongation or with relevant official warnings; group B, drugs with published clinical or preclinical evidence; group C, drugs with published clinical evidence; group D, drug with published clinical evidence on torsades de pointes or ventricular arrhythmias associated with QT prolongation; group E, drugs belonging to group D with official warnings. We retrieved 1998 sales data from community pharmacies in seven countries (Australia, Denmark, England, Germany, Greece, Italy and Sweden). Data for individual agents were expressed as defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/1000/day). Overall use in each country was calculated for each drug group. Groups D and E were considered as the most clinically relevant.

RESULTS

Among the 102 nonantiarrhythmic agents meeting at least one of the inclusion criteria, 33 drugs had sales data > or =1 DDD/1000/day and 71 drugs had a use > or =0.1 DDD/1000/day in at least one country. Among the 37 nonantiarrhythmic agents with published reports of ventricular arrhythmias associated with QT prolongation, 12 compounds had sales data > or =1 DDD/1000/day. Total consumption in each country ranged: from 51.9 to 94.7 DDD/1000/day for group A; from 51.6 to 92.7 DDD/1000/day for group B; from 37.1 to 76.6 DDD/1000/day for group C; from 12.9 to 29.1 DDD/1000/day for group D; and from 5.8 to 15.3 DDD/1000/day for group E.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of wide variations in the sales of individual agents, the overall extent of use of nonantiarrhythmic QT-prolonging drugs was of the same order of magnitude in all countries. The significant use of drugs belonging to categories D and E should prompt careful risk/benefit assessment of each agent.