CD30+ T-cell lymphoma in a patient with psoriasis treated with ciclosporin and infliximab

Increased Risk of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Development after Dupilumab Use for Atopic Dermatitis

There have been several reports of dupilumab use and the development of CTCL; however, the risk of CTCL development has not been adequately evaluated at the population level. The objective of this study is to determine whether dupilumab administration for AD is associated with an increased risk of developing CTCL and to identify at-risk populations within this group. This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a deidentified medical record database including over 107 million patients, to identify eligible patients. Treatment and control groups were evaluated for the development of CTCL. Patients of any age with a documented diagnosis of AD were included. The treatment cohort included individuals treated with dupilumab, while the control cohort included AD patients treated with alternative therapies. Selected biologics were excluded from both groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate three age groups and to identify whether the risk of CTCL development was higher within a given time frame after starting dupilumab. We identified a total of 1,181,533 patients with AD. Of these, 19,612 patients were prescribed dupilumab. Both treatment and control groups included 19,612 patients matched for age, race, and sex. The mean age was 32.3 years (P = 0.96), and females accounted for approximately 52% (P = 0.93) in both groups. Patients treated with dupilumab for AD had an increased relative risk (RR) of developing CTCL compared to those never treated with dupilumab (RR = 4.59, 95% confidence interval 2.459-8.567, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that about half of the CTCL cases after dupilumab therapy (54.5%, 30/55) occurred in patients over the age of 60 years. In contrast, all CTCL cases (100%, 12/12) within the untreated cohort were observed in individuals over the age of 60. Of the patients diagnosed with CTCL following dupilumab use, the majority (62%, 34/55) were diagnosed within the first year. Overall, we find that the use of dupilumab for treating AD is associated with an increased relative risk of developing CTCL. This risk is highest in the first year of therapy and in adult patients. These findings suggest exercising caution in treating select groups of patients with dupilumab.

Risk of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma with Psoriasis Biologic Therapies

BACKGROUND

The risk of developing cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients using psoriasis biologics has not been well characterized. The goals of this review were to investigate the incidence of CTCL in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy in clinical trials and psoriasis registries, and to review cases of CTCL and biologic use reported in scientific publications.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine clinical trials database (clinicaltrials.gov) was queried to identify phase 3 and 4 clinical trials of the 12 biologic agents currently FDA approved for psoriatic disease. The incidence of CTCL in these trials was examined and summarized. To examine the incidence of CTCL in psoriasis registries, a Medline search was conducted. Finally, we performed a systematic review of CTCL cases reported in the literature.

RESULTS

Only two cases of CTCL were reported in 35,801 subjects with psoriasis receiving a biologic agent in the active arm of 108 psoriasis phase 3 clinical trials. One of these CTCL cases was determined by the investigator to be CTCL misdiagnosed as psoriasis prior to randomization. No cases of CTCL were reported in 5440 subjects with psoriasis in 34 phase 4 clinical trials. Only one case of CTCL was identified in 34,111 registry subjects. In the literature, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors had the highest number of reported cases of CTCL (34 cases), followed by interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (7 cases), and IL-12/23 inhibitors (6 cases). No cases of CTCL were found to be reported with IL-23 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the development of CTCL is rare in the setting of psoriasis biologic use. Of the limited number of cases of CTCL found, most were in the setting of TNF inhibitor use and no cases of CTCL were reported in the setting of IL-23 inhibitor use.

Development of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Following Biologic Treatment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma following biologic therapy is extremely rare.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the development of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) following treatment with a biologic agent.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed for patients who developed CTCL after exposure to biologic therapy. Works were limited to English language and excluded animal studies, guidelines, and protocols. Potentially eligible titles were identified using controlled vocabulary in tandem with key words. The search strategy was peer-reviewed prior to execution.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight total studies revealed sixty-two patients who developed CTCL following exposure to a biologic agent. Of these, 44% were Caucasian, and the median age at diagnosis was 56 years. Seventy-six percent of patients received biologic therapy for a primary inflammatory skin condition. Dupilumab was the most reported (42%) agent amongst the cohort. The median time from initiation of the biologic agent to diagnosis of CTCL in these cases was 4 months (range: 0-84). Mycosis fungoides (65%) and Sézary syndrome (10%) were the most common subtypes of CTCL diagnosed. Twenty-one (34%) patients were reported to be alive with disease, outcome was not reported in 21 patients (34%), ten patients (16%) were alive and in complete remission, eight patients (13%) died of disease and two patients (3%) died due to other causes.

CONCLUSION

While biologic agents may have a role in the development of CTCL, in order to definitively elucidate their role, more methodologically robust studies (such as those that utilize population databases) would need to occur.

The link between total antioxidant status, total oxidant status, arylesterase activity, and subgingival microbiota in psoriasis patients

BACKGROUND

Studies focusing on the relationship between periodontitis and systemic diseases have suggested a possible association between these two chronic and inflammatory disorders. We aimed to comparatively investigate the salivary oxidative status, biomarker levels, clinical findings, and the microbial load on subgingival biofilm samples in psoriasis patients and controls.

METHODS

Forty participants were allocated into four groups as follows: (1) systemically and periodontally healthy (C group); (2) systemically healthy with periodontitis (P group); (3) psoriasis (Ps) and periodontally healthy (Ps-C group); and (4) Ps with periodontitis (Ps-P group). Subgingival biofilm samples were obtained to detect the periodontopathogenic agents by Real-time PCR (qPCR). The total antioxidant status (TAS) (mmol/l), total oxidant status (TOS) (μmol/l), and arylesterase (ARE) activity (U/L) were analyzed using saliva samples.

RESULTS

The level of TOS and oxidative stress index (OSI) were significantly higher in patients with Ps-P and P compared to controls (P = 0.001, and P ˂ 0.001, respectively). ARE levels were higher in controls compared to Ps and P (P ˂ 0.001). The prevalences of bacteria detected in subgingival biofilm samples were similar between all groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reported that psoriasis may amplify TOS and OSI, and the co-existence of psoriasis and periodontitis may aggravate oxidative stress.

Updates on the Treatment of Erythrodermic Psoriasis

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a rare variant of psoriasis, which is potentially life threatening and often resistant to conventional therapy. Biologics have revolutionized the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis, and shown promise in EP. However, due to the lack of head-to-head studies and the rarity of EP, no high level evidence-based treatment guidelines for EP have been established, and the evidence of treatment of EP is limited to case reports or small case series. Here, we present a narrative review focusing on the up-to-date information for the treatment of EP.

CCR4-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma presenting as eosinophilic pneumonia and developing from prolonged pustular psoriasis

A 29-year-old woman with chronic, prolonged pustular psoriasis was admitted to our hospital because of high-grade fever and a systemic skin rash. General examination revealed a whole-body skin rash and superficial lymphadenopathy. Peripheral blood examination showed unclassified cells positive for CD3, CD4, and T-cell receptor αβ, and negative for CD20 and CD56. Soon after administration, she developed acute respiratory failure and required artificial ventilation. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed increased numbers of eosinophils and abnormal lymphocytes of the same phenotype in peripheral blood and skin. She was diagnosed with eosinophilic pneumonia, and her respiratory failure was improved by corticosteroid therapy. Based on the histological findings of skin, lymph node, and bone marrow biopsies, a diagnosis of peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), with positivity for CC chemokine receptor 4 was made. She received chemotherapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation, which resulted in complete remission of her PTCL-NOS. She remained alive and disease-free 6 years later. This is the first reported case of PTCL-NOS developing during the clinical course of pustular psoriasis. The clinical manifestations of PTCL-NOS are complex, but an accurate diagnosis and appropriate therapy may produce a good clinical outcome in patients with PTCL-NOS.

Primary Cutaneous CD30+ Anaplastic Large T Cell Lymphoma in a Patient Treated with Cyclosporine for Actinic Reticuloid

Actinic reticuloid (AR)-a subtype of chronic actinic dermatitis-clinically and histopathologically shows lymphoma-like features. We report a male patient initially diagnosed with erythrodermic cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) who developed severe broadband photosensitivity. Clinical evaluation, histopathology, and phototesting were consistent with AR. The patient was treated with cyclosporine 150-300 mg/d. Under this therapy, he developed several times primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphomas (C-ALCL) which in part tended to regress spontaneously under cyclosporine reduction. The association between cyclosporine treatment and development of C-ALCL and other CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders has previously been reported in patients with atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and transplant patients. In conclusion, the present case highlights the difficulties arising in the distinction between AR and CTCL and shows that long-term cyclosporine treatment may cause C-ALCL development in AR as well.

Follicular eruption with folliculotropic lymphocytic infiltrates associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy: Report and study of 3 cases

BACKGROUND

We have encountered three cases of follicular eruptions with folliculotropic infiltrates of non-atypical lymphocytes associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) therapy.

METHODS

Three patients aged 15 to 56 years treated with anti-TNF-α therapy (one with adalimumab, and two with infliximab) developed follicular eruptions characterized histopathologically by folliculotropic lymphocytic infiltrates. These were studied clinically, histopathologically, immunophenotypically, and molecularly.

RESULTS

All three cases were characterized histopathologically by folliculotropic cell infiltrates of non-atypical T (CD3+) lymphocytes with variable follicular exocytosis. Marked reduction in CD7 staining and marked predominance of CD4+ cells over CD8+ cells were observed in 1 and 2 cases, respectively. T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement studies were monoclonal in 1 case. Discontinuation of anti-TNF-α therapy in all three cases, with corticosteroid creams in 1 case, led to complete resolution. Rechallenge with adalimumab in 1 case resulted in exacerbation. Replacement of therapy with non-anti-TNF-α biologic agents in 2 cases was not associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Follicular eruptions with folliculotropic lymphocytic infiltrates associated with anti-TNF-α therapy may show some immunophenotypical variations and/or monoclonal TCR gene rearrangements but lack sufficient cytomorphological features of folliculotropic MF. They may resolve with discontinuation of anti-TNF-α therapy.

Progression of undiagnosed cutaneous lymphoma after anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous lymphoma diagnosed after anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy (anti-TNF-α) has been reported in the literature, yet a clear link between both events remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience with cutaneous lymphoma diagnosed during or after the use of anti-TNF-α therapies.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study and a literature review.

RESULTS

A total of 22 cases, including 20 cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) and 2 cutaneous B-cell lymphomas, were identified. In the CTCL group, 75% of the patients received an anti-TNF-α agent for a presumed inflammatory skin condition. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome were the most common subtypes of CTCL diagnosed. Advanced disease (stage IIB to IVA) was commonly seen at time of diagnosis and required aggressive therapy, including stem cell transplant in 3 patients; 2 patients in whom cutaneous B-cell lymphomas was diagnosed had an indolent course. A total of 31 cases were gathered from a literature search.

LIMITATIONS

This is a retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the disease of most of the identified patients was misdiagnosed as psoriasis or eczema; therefore, a comprehensive morphologic and molecular review of skin biopsy specimens and peripheral blood samples should be considered before initiation of anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with poorly defined dermatitis or atypical presentations of psoriasis.

Biologic Therapeutics in the Treatment of Psoriasis. Part 1: Review

Background:

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease principally mediated by activated T cells, which release proinflammatory cytokines with reactive epidermal changes in the skin, producing the characteristic lesions of psoriasis. New research into possible treatment options has been inspired by increased understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis and advances in immunology and molecular biology permitting the development of targeted, highly active biologic agents.

Objective:

The aim of this article is to review the efficacy and safety of five biologic therapeutics in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and to provide practical guidelines for integration of these agents in the management of psoriasis.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE (1966–2005) for articles containing the key words: alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab and searched recent conference abstracts.

Results:

Emerging immunotherapeutic agents (fusion proteins, recombinant cytokines, fusion toxins, or antibodies) target T cells or cytokines responsible for plaque formation that is characteristic of psoriasis. Alefacept is the first biologic to be approved in both the United States and Canada. More recently, efalizumab and etanercept and infliximab have been approved in the United States and Canada for plaque-type psoriasis. Adalimumab is currently in phase III clinical trials.

Conclusion:

These novel biologics offer an intriguing and effective treatment option for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Effects of tofacitinib on lymphocyte sub-populations, CMV and EBV viral load in patients with plaque psoriasis

Background

Plaque psoriasis is a debilitating skin condition that affects approximately 2% of the adult population and for which there is currently no cure. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for psoriasis.

Methods

The design of this study has been reported previously (NCT00678210). Patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis received tofacitinib (2 mg, 5 mg, or 15 mg) or placebo, twice daily, for 12 weeks. Lymphocyte sub-populations, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA were measured at baseline and up to Week 12.

Results

Tofacitinib was associated with modest, dose-dependent percentage increases from baseline in median B cell count at Week 4 (24–68%) and Week 12 (18–43%) and percentage reductions from baseline in median natural killer cell count at Week 4 (11–40%). The proportion of patients with detectable CMV and EBV DNA (defined as >0 copies/500 ng total DNA) increased post-baseline in tofacitinib-treated patients. However, multivariate analyses found no relationship between changes in CMV or EBV viral load and changes in lymphocyte sub-populations or tofacitinib treatment.

Conclusions

Twelve weeks of treatment with tofacitinib had no clinically significant effects on CMV or EBV viral load, suggesting that lymphocyte sub-populations critical to the response to chronic viral infections and viral reactivation were not significantly affected. Replication of these findings during long-term use of tofacitinib will allow confirmation of this observation.

Lymphomatoid papulosis in a patient treated with adalimumab for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are now well regarded as highly effective treatment modalities for multiple immunologically mediated diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and psoriasis. The mechanism of action for this particular class of medications involves the blockade of multiple intracellular signaling pathways originating from TNF-α, ultimately inducing a generalized immunosuppressed state. In fact, several cases of lymphomas have been reported in patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents, though it has been difficult to prove any degree of causality. Herein, we described a patient who developed lymphomatoid papulosis after being treated with adalimumab, whereby a clear causality could be established.

Does p40-targeted therapy represent a significant evolution in the management of plaque psoriasis?

The recognition of the roles of interleukins (IL)-12 and IL-23 in the development of psoriasis is an important advance in the understanding, and the subsequent management, of this chronic inflammatory disease. Two human anti-p40 monoclonal antibodies targeting both IL-12 and IL-23 via their shared p40 subunit have been developed: briakinumab and ustekinumab. Recent Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials have illustrated the benefits of briakinumab (in Phase 3 clinical development) and ustekinumab (approved in the EU, and also in other territories worldwide) in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Available data indicate that a strategy targeting the IL-12 p40 subunit has considerable advantages over targeting of tumour necrosis factor-α, offering rapid onset of efficacy with a favourable dosing regimen (every 12 weeks for ustekinumab). Registries incorporating rigorous pharmacovigilance are now required to further understand the clinical profile of these drugs over long-term use.

Iatrogenic effects of biologics for psoriasis

Use of the biologic agents in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis has provided novel and highly efficacious treatment options. Generally less systemically toxic than more traditional agents, the risks and benefits for these agents must also be considered. We present a review of the iatrogenic effects associated with use of the biologic agents in psoriasis. Focus is placed on antitumor necrosis factor agents, because they are the most studied and commonly used agents, as well as T-cell modulators and interleukin inhibitors.

Cutaneous lymphoma in a patient with ulcerative colitis after immunosuppressive therapy

INTRODUCTION

Biologics are generally safe and well tolerated. However, the risk of haematopoietic cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving infliximab has been a growing concern.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the first case of cutaneous lymphoma after short use of infliximab in 75-year old Caucasian man with a 7-year history of ulcerative colitis.

CONCLUSION

Our current knowledge is not sufficient to rule out an increased risk of lymphoma associated with biologics, or allow definitive conclusions to be drawn about the association of infliximab and lymphoma. However, this case and others direct the attention to that both higher index of suspicion and closer follow up are required if patients are maintained on long-term infliximab together with other immunosuppressive therapy.

Sources of information on lymphoma associated with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents: comparison of published case reports and cases reported to the French pharmacovigilance system

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, through their intense immunoregulatory effect, have been suspected to increase the risk of malignant lymphoma. However, the classical epidemiological approaches conducted over about the last 10 years have not totally succeeded in addressing the question of a causal or artifactual association. Therefore, the analysis of a substantial set of case reports, although usually considered as poorly generalizable to the general population, could be particularly informative. Two main sources of case reports in postmarketing settings are available; publications in medical journals and reports to pharmacovigilance systems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the characteristics of case reports from both these sources in order to understand whether they provided the same information for the investigation of the causal link between lymphoma and anti-TNF agents.

METHODS

All case reports of malignant lymphoma in patients treated with an anti-TNF agent published in MEDLINE and all reports to the French pharmacovigilance system up to 1 February 2010 were identified. Cases of malignant lymphoma identified in postmarketing surveillance from both sources were compared regarding the following variables: age, sex, anti-TNF agent involved, indication for use, type of lymphoma, prior or concomitant immunosuppressive drugs and time to onset of lymphoma.

RESULTS

A total of 81 published case reports and 61 cases reported to the French pharmacovigilance system were compared. In published reports, patients were younger (p = 0.03) and more frequently receiving a first anti-TNF treatment (p = 0.03), particularly infliximab (p = 0.03). Conversely, in the pharmacovigilance system reports, a succession of different anti-TNFs (p = 0.03) and adalimumab (p < 0.0001) were more frequently reported. Lymphomas in patients treated with anti-TNF agents for Crohn's disease were more prevalent in published cases than in pharmacovigilance reports (p < 0.0001), and in particular involved hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma. Conversely, rheumatoid arthritis was the main indication for anti-TNF agents in pharmacovigilance reports (p = 0.01). Time to onset was markedly shorter in published cases (median 12 months) than in pharmacovigilance reports (median 30 months; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of published cases and those reported to the French pharmacovigilance system differed markedly for all characteristics tested, except sex and the use of prior or concomitant immunosuppressive drugs. Published case reports favoured convincing arguments for drug causation whereas cases reported to the pharmacovigilance system were more disparate but could describe more accurately the reality of lymphoma occurrence in this particular population. These results argue for the use of the pharmacovigilance reports when case reports are used to investigate the causal link between lymphoma and anti-TNF agents at the population level. Data from cases notified to the French pharmacovigilance system did not indicate an increased risk of lymphoma during the early phase of anti-TNF treatment. To confirm this hypothesis, a study combining pharmacovigilance reports from several countries, or, if feasible, a cohort study both with a large sample size and a long duration of follow-up would be required.

The risk of cancer in patients with psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

An association between psoriasis and malignancy has been explored. However, no studies have been reported regarding cancer risk in Asian psoriasis populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of cancer development in association with psoriasis. The effects of age at diagnosis, treatment modalities, and observation time were also evaluated.

METHODS

Data for this retrospective population-based cohort study were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). This study included 3,686 patients with first-time diagnosis of psoriasis between 1996 and 2000. Another 200,000 patients without psoriasis served as the comparison group. All enrolled subjects were followed-up until the end of 2007. Cumulative incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) of cancer development were determined.

RESULTS

Among the 3,686 psoriasis patients, 116 had incident cancers. The 7-year cumulative incidence of cancer among psoriasis patients was 4.8%. The adjusted HR for developing a cancer in association with psoriasis was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-2.00). Cancer risk was higher in male patients than in female patients (adjusted HR 1.86 vs.1.14, respectively). Certain cancers were significantly associated with psoriasis, including those of the urinary bladder and skin, followed by oropharynx/larynx, liver/gallbladder, and colon/rectum. Patients with psoriasis had an increased adjusted HR for cancer that varied by age. Younger patients with psoriasis tended to have the greatest risk of cancer. Finally, systemic phototherapy and oral medication did not significantly increase the risk of cancer. Phototherapy with UVB appeared to reduce the risk of cancer in psoriasis (adjusted HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.95; P = .03).

LIMITATIONS

NHIRD did not contain information regarding severity of psoriasis, status of smoking, alcohol use, family history of cancer, or diet. Misclassification of disease cannot be ruled out in a registry-based database.

CONCLUSIONS

Psoriasis carries an elevated risk of malignancies, especially in younger and in male patients. This effect is independent of systemic treatment for psoriasis. Finally, phototherapy with UVB did not increase, but rather reduced, the risk of cancer in psoriasis.

The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: part II

Cyclosporine is highly effective in the treatment of a multitude of dermatoses. Concern over its side effect profile has limited its use in dermatology. Adverse effects are, for the most part, dose dependent and related to duration of therapy. Using the recommended monitoring protocols results in a significant decrease in the incidence of cyclosporine-related toxicities. This article provides a comprehensive review of the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine, potential drug interactions, adverse effects, and recommendations for monitoring in patients treated with cyclosporine. The use of cyclosporine in pregnancy and in the pediatric population is also addressed.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the monitoring guidelines of cyclosporine, its contraindications, its possible drug interactions, its adverse effect profile, and its use in pregnancy and the childhood and adolescent populations.

Update on the risk of lymphoma following immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

The care of inflammatory bowel disease has changed considerably with the introduction of a number of immunosuppressants including anti-metabolite and anti-TNF therapies. While efficacious, these medications also carry important risks, notably the potential risk of lymphoma. This risk is one of the most worrisome for both patients and physicians. Our current knowledge is still evolving; however, our understanding of what risks these drugs carry, both individually and synergistically, is critical in allowing informed decision making. In this article, we will describe the known lymphoma risks of commonly used immunosuppressant medications in inflammatory bowel disease, with an emphasis on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma.

Association Between Cancer and Immunosuppressive Therapy—Analysis of Selected Studies in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid

Objective:

To determine whether there is an association between the use of immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) and cancer in patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid—rare, potentially fatal diseases of the skin and mucous membranes, often requiring long-term use of ISAs.

Data Source:

Literature was accessed through PubMed (all years available), using the search terms cancer, immunosuppressive agents, pemphigoid, and pemphigus.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

A retrospective review of the literature was conducted. Inclusion criteria for studies were: (1) English language, (2) diagnosis of pemphigus and/or pemphigoid based on histology and immunopathology, (3) more than 10 patients evaluated, (4) investigators had a high index of suspicion of cancer and patients were monitored for it, (5) follow-up information was provided for at least 1 year after initiation of therapy, and (6) absence of diagnosis of cancer before initiation of an ISA. Case reports were not included in the analysis.

Data Synthesis:

A total of 929 patients diagnosed with either pemphigus or pemphigoid in 17 studies were identified. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised patients treated with azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporins, or mycophenolate mofetil in combination with prednisone. In Group A. 22 cases of cancer were reported in 21 of the 218 patients (9.6%). Group B comprised patients treated with systemic corticosteroids only. In this group, cancer was reported in 11 of the 711 patients (1.5%). In this study there was no control group (untreated patients) and the sample sizes were small.

Conclusions:

Preliminary data suggest a possible association between the use of azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine and increased susceptibility to cancer in patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid.

Golimumab and malignancies: true or false association?

Malignancy is one of the comorbidities linked to golimumab, a biological TNF-α blocker. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched different databases and analyzed original publications to elucidate the remaining open question about the real association of malignancies with golimumab therapy. The most frequent cancer in patients treated with golimumab, in association or not with methotrexate, is the lung adenocarcinoma. However, lymphoma is not very commonly represented in these patients. We show that there is no major and evident risk of malignancies associated with golimumab in current scientific literature. An increased risk of malignancies may be associated with golimumab, but this warrants further clinical confirmation. Also, this risk mentioned in different studies must be taken with caution because of number of limits and biases.

Is there truly a risk of lymphoma from biologic therapies?

The treatment of psoriasis has undergone a revolution with the advent of biologic therapies, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, efalizumab, and alefacept. Biologics are generally safe and well tolerated. However, there has been concern over the risk of lymphoma with use of these agents because of their immunosuppressive properties. This review summarizes the current evidence in regards to lymphoma risk with biologic therapy obtained from case reports and case series, observational studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses. The majority of data for T-cell inhibitors comes from case reports and relatively small, short-term clinical trials. In addition to published case reports and case series, TNF-alpha inhibitors have also been studied extensively in large cohort studies and meta-analyses of clinical trials derived primarily from the rheumatoid arthritis population. Current data are neither sufficient to completely rule out an increased risk of lymphoma associated with biologics, nor to firmly establish a causal relationship between biologics and lymphoma. Short- to intermediate-term treatment with biologics (e.g., up to 4 years) appears to be very safe with respect to lymphoma risk, especially with TNF-alpha inhibitors in which their potential risks appear to be well defined. Continued vigilance is warranted; however, in the appropriate patient, the risk-to-benefit profile of psoriasis treatment with respect to lymphoma risk appears highly favorable.

Treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis: from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation

BACKGROUND

Erythrodermic psoriasis is a severe form of psoriasis that can arise acutely or follow a chronic course. There are a number of treatment options, but overall there are few evidence-based data to guide clinicians in managing these challenging cases.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to create treatment recommendations to help dermatologists treat patients with erythrodermic psoriasis.

METHODS

A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options for erythrodermic or exfoliative psoriasis. Meetings were held by teleconference and were coordinated and funded by the National Psoriasis Foundation. Consensus on treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis was achieved. A literature review was conducted to examine treatment options for erythrodermic psoriasis and the strength of the evidence for each option.

RESULTS

There is no high-quality scientific evidence on which to base treatment recommendations. Treatment should be dictated by the severity of disease at time of presentation and the patient's comorbidities. Cyclosporine and infliximab appear to be the most rapidly acting agents for the treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis. Acitretin and methotrexate are also appropriate first-line choices, although they usually work more slowly. Treating physicians can consider a number of second-line agents, including etanercept or combination therapy, in the treatment of patients with erythrodermic psoriasis. Combination therapy may be more effective than a single-agent approach; there is a paucity of scientific data in this area. All patients should be evaluated for underlying infection. Supportive care can help control disease and patient symptoms if instituted appropriately. Physicians should avoid potential exacerbating agents when managing this challenging disease.

LIMITATIONS

There are few high-quality studies examining treatment options for erythrodermic psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of patients with erythrodermic psoriasis demands a thorough understanding of the treatment options available. Therapy should be based on acuity of disease and the patient's underlying comorbidities. There are limited data available to compare treatment options for erythrodermic psoriasis. Further studies are necessary to explore the optimal treatment algorithm for these patients.

Cutaneous side effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic therapy: a clinical review

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents have been associated with a number of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To review the cutaneous reactions that have been reported in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic MEDLINE search of relevant publications, including case reports and case series.

RESULTS

Reported cutaneous events included infusion and injection site reactions, psoriasiform eruptions, lupus-like disorders, vasculitis, granulomatous reactions, cutaneous infections, and cutaneous neoplasms. Infusion reactions and injection site reactions were definitely associated with anti-TNF administration, whereas all other events had a varying strength of association and severity, not necessarily requiring drug discontinuation.

LIMITATIONS

Most information was derived from spontaneous case reports, where ascertainment biases and frequency of reporting may impair detection methodology and causal relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

As anti-TNF biologic agents are progressively being used in clinical practice, cutaneous adverse events will be encountered more frequently. Until more data are accumulated with respect to their pathogenesis and potential association with anti-TNF therapy, dermatologists should become more familiar with the clinical presentation and management of such events.

The use of ciclosporin in psoriasis

Ciclosporin is a cyclic undecapeptide discovered in the 1970s to possess a potent inhibitory action on T lymphocytes. The subsequent discovery, in 1979, that it was remarkably effective in treatment of psoriasis transformed thinking about the nature of the disease, which subsequently became generally recognized as autoimmune in nature. Ciclosporin remains one of the most effective and rapidly acting treatments currently available for psoriasis. Virtually all the diverse manifestations of this disease can respond. The main side effects are nephrotoxicity and hypertension. There is considerable variation between individuals in susceptibility to these so careful monitoring is required. Ciclosporin should be used in single or intermittent short courses for all except the most severe cases as this is safer than continuous treatment. The rate of improvement depends very much on the dose, which ranges from 2 to 5.0 mg/kg/day. Ciclosporin can be combined with any topical treatment and a useful dose-sparing effect can be achieved in this way if patients are compliant. In severe cases ciclosporin is often used in combination with other systemic antipsoriatic drugs in order to spare the dose of each agent and reduce toxicity. Concurrent or intercurrent use of ultraviolet therapy is discouraged due to the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer. This article reviews the mode of action, pharmacokinetics, indications, contraindications, side effects, dosage regimens, pretreatment screening and monitoring, drug interactions, and use of treatment combinations with ciclosporin in the management of psoriasis.

[Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and pustular psoriasis: a case report]

Psoriasis has been hypothesized to be associated with lymphoma. Several studies demonstrated an epidemiological relationship between these two entities. Patients with psoriasis are at increased risk for developing lymphoproliferative malignancies. This risk can be also the consequence of immunosuppressive therapies (methotrexate or cyclosporine). We report a 65-year-old man who presented with diffuse erythematous plaques with pustular or squamous borders. Histopathologic evaluation concluded to a pustular psoriasis. We discover simultaneously a stage 4 bone marrow B lymphoma of low grade of malignancy. This case report highlights the relationships between psoriasis and lymphoma.

Treatments for psoriasis and the risk of malignancy

BACKGROUND

There are multiple therapeutic options for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. The process of choosing among potential treatment options requires both the physician and the patient to weigh the benefits of individual modalities against their potential risks. Traditional systemic therapies for psoriasis, including methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CsA), have a well-documented array of toxicities, particularly end-organ toxicities. Over the past several years, the use of biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis has been a major clinical and research focus. With the advent of these novel immunosuppressive therapies, one of the central safety issues surrounding these agents is their potential to increase the risk of malignancy.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to review the risk of malignancy associated with therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, including phototherapy, traditional systemic therapies, and biologic therapies. We reviewed the existing body of literature in order to define the known incidence of malignancy associated with psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA), narrowband and broadband ultraviolet B (UVB), MTX, CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and biologic therapies, including alefacept, efalizumab, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and ustekinumab.

RESULTS

PUVA, when given long term, is associated with increased risks of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma. Reviews of studies on UVB, both narrowband and broadband, do not indicate any increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer or melanoma. The traditional systemic psoriasis therapies-MTX, CsA, and MMF-may be associated with an increased risk of lymphoproliferative disorders during treatment, demonstrated in clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and documented in case reports concerning psoriasis patients. The risk of malignancy with biologic therapy is still unclear. However, the majority of studies examining this carcinogenic risk suggest that tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors may cause a slightly increased risk of cancer, including nonmelanoma skin cancer and hematologic malignancies.

LIMITATIONS

The majority of studies cited in this review lack the power and randomization of large clinical trials, as well as the long-term follow-up periods which would further substantiate the hypothetical link between these antipsoriatic treatment regimens and the potential for malignancy. Because of the substantial lack of clinical data, the majority of studies evaluated focus on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, which is a systemic inflammatory disorder comparable to psoriasis. Additionally, the increased risk of malignancy associated with psoriasis itself is a confounding factor.

CONCLUSION

Many of the therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, including PUVA, traditional systemic therapies, and some biologic therapies, may increase the risk of malignancy. Appropriate patient counseling and selection, as well as clinical follow-up, are necessary to maximize safety with these agents. Further long-term study is necessary to more precisely quantify the risks associated with biologic therapies.

T cell lymphoproliferative disorders associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody therapy for ulcerative colitis: literature summary

The enhanced risk of development of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has been attributed to immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapies. Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998 as an effective therapeutic agent against inflammatory bowel disease. Malignant lymphomas of both B and T cell lineage have been described in patients undergoing therapy involving TNF-α blockade. To date, eight cases of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-negative hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma associated with infliximab have been reported to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, as well as several other T cell lymphoproliferative disorders with aggressive clinical outcomes. We present the histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of a T cell lymphoproliferative disorder involving the axillary lymph node of a 33-year-old male following infliximab treatment for ulcerative colitis. These EBV-negative lymphomas suggest that lymphoproliferative disorders following infliximab treatment for inflammatory bowel disease may involve EBV-independent immune dysregulation. The spectrum of lymphoproliferative disorders associated with infliximab and the potential mechanisms by which they occur are discussed.

Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations affecting approximately 2% of the population. In this first of 5 sections of the guidelines of care for psoriasis, we discuss the classification of psoriasis; associated comorbidities including autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular risk, psychiatric/psychologic issues, and cancer risk; along with assessment tools for skin disease and quality-of-life issues. Finally, we will discuss the safety and efficacy of the biologic treatments used to treat patients with psoriasis.