The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

aCL/β2GPI and aPS/PT show synergic thrombogenic effects in suppressing anticoagulant activity of APC and stimulating tissue factor expression and TNF-α secretion by mononuclear cells

INTRODUCTION

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) possessing anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are often complicated by thrombotic vascular events. aPLs commonly associated with the complications are anti-cardiolipin/β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies (aCL/β₂GPI) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT). However, the pathological mechanisms leading to thrombosis remain unclear. We explored clinical features of SLE patients with aCL/β₂GPI and aPS/PT and investigated thrombogenic effects of their IgG fractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 97 SLE patients and 38 healthy control volunteers and performed activated protein C (APC) resistance screening test using their plasma samples. To detect the direct effect of aPLs IgG on APC, we developed an APC sensitivity ratio assay. Effects of aPLs IgG on monocytes were studied by measuring the surface expression of tissue factor (TF) and excretion of TNF-α from peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Thrombotic complications among SLE patients were closely associated with aCL/β₂GPI or aPS/PT, with higher prevalence in patients with both antibodies. Addition of aPLs⁽⁺⁾-IgG to the APC sensitivity ratio assay led to significant suppression of the anticoagulant activity of APC. The suppression was more pronounced in double-positive cases. TF expression on monocytes and concentration of TNF-α in culture medium were increased by aPLs, again more pronounced in double-positive cases. These results indicate that the effects of aCL/β₂GPI and aPS/PT are synergic both for APC anticoagulant activity and for production of TF and TNF-α from mononuclear cells. These modes of thrombogenic action of aPLs could be an important target for developing specific measures to prevent complications of SLE.

Thrombophilia, risk factors and prevention

INTRODUCTION

Fifty-three years after the first description of an inherited prothrombotic condition (antithrombin deficiency), our knowledge on hereditary and acquired causes of hypercoagulability that can predispose carriers to venous thromboembolism (VTE) has greatly improved. Areas covered: Main causes of hereditary thrombophilia are summarized alongside new prothrombotic mutations recently discovered. The main causes of acquired thrombophilia, and namely, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and hyperhomocysteinemia, are also discussed together with other common acquired prothrombotic states characterized by an increase of procoagulant factors and/or a decrease of natural anticoagulants. Finally, suggestions for thromboprophylaxis in carriers of hereditary thrombophilia according to current guidelines/evidence are made for the most challenging high-risk situations (i.e. surgery, pregnancy, contraception, cancer, economy class syndrome) as well as for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome. Expert opinion: A carrier of inherited thrombophilia should be evaluated in the framework of other (genetic and/or acquired) coexisting risk factors for first or recurrent VTE when assessing the need and duration of prevention (primary prophylaxis). Prevention strategies should be tailored to each patient and every situational risk factor. The knowledge of the carriership status of severe thrombophilia in the proband can be important to provide asymptomatic relatives with adequate counseling on thrombophilia screening or primary thromboprophylaxis.

In families with inherited thrombophilia the risk of venous thromboembolism is dependent on the clinical phenotype of the proband

The utility of laboratory investigation of relatives of individuals with inherited thrombophilia is uncertain. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among the carriers, we investigated a family cohort of 1,720 relatives of probands with thrombophilia who were evaluated because of VTE (n=1,088), premature arterial thrombosis (n=113), obstetric complication (n=257), or universal screening before pregnancy or hormonal contraception or therapy (n=262); 968 relatives were carriers of thrombophilia. A first deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 44 carriers and 10 non-carriers during 37,688 and 29,548 observationyears from birth, respectively. The risk of DVT among the carriers compared with non-carriers was estimated as a hazard ratio (HR). If the proband had VTE and factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin (PT)20210A, the HR for DVT was 2.77 (95%CI 1.21–4.82) in the carriers overall, and 5.54 (95%CI 3.20–187.00) in those homozygous or double heterozygous for FVL and PT20210A. If the proband had VTE and a deficiency of antithrombin (AT), protein C or S, the HR for DVT was 5.14 (95%CI 0.88–10.03) in the carriers overall, and 12.86 (95%CI 2.46–59.90) in those with AT deficiency. No increase in risk was found among the carriers who were relatives of the probands who were evaluated for reasons other than VTE. In conclusion, familial investigation for inherited thrombophilia seems justified for probands with previous VTE, but appears of doubtful utility for the relatives of probands without VTE. This should be taken with caution regarding families with deficiency of natural anticoagulants, given the low number of cases analysed.

Circulating microparticles in carriers of prothrombin G20210A mutation

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin gene mutation G20210A (PTM) are the two most common genetic polymorphisms known to predispose carriers to venous thromboembolism (VTE). A recent study in FVL carriers showed that circulating levels of microparticles (MP) may contribute to their thrombogenic profile. To further elucidate the prothrombotic state linked to genetic thrombophilia, we extended this study to carriers of PTM. The plasma level of annexin V-MP, endothelial- MP (EMP), platelet-MP (PMP), tissue factor-bearing MP (TF+) and the MP procoagulant activity (PPL) was measured in 124 carriers of PTM (105 heterozygous and 19 homozygous) and in 120 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals. Heterozygous and homozygous carriers of PTM showed significantly increased levels of annexin V-MP (2930 [1440–4646] MP/μl and 3064 [2412–4906] MP/μl, respectively) and significantly shorter PPL clotting time (54 [46–67] sec and 55 [46–64] sec) compared to controls (1728 [782–2122] MP/μl and 71 [61–75] sec, respectively; p<0.01). Similarly, heterozygous and homozygous subjects presented with significantly higher levels of EMP, PMP and TF+ than controls (p<0.05). PTM carriers with a VTE history had significantly higher MP numbers and activity than controls. No significant difference was seen between carriers with and without a VTE history. We conclude that the higher levels of circulating MP found in PTM carriers may play a role in the development of VTE possibly by increasing thrombin generation. Further studies are needed to better define the role of MP as triggering factors for the thrombotic complications characterizing mild genetic thrombophilic defects.

Modulating thrombotic diathesis in hereditary thrombophilia and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: a role for circulating microparticles?

Over the past decades, there have been great advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with inherited and acquired thrombophilia [mainly antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS)]. However, a number of questions remain unanswered. Prognostic markers capable of estimating the individual VTE risk would be of great use. Microparticles (MPs) are sub-micron membrane vesicles constitutively released from the surface of cells after cellular activation and apoptosis. The effects of MPs on thrombogenesis include the exposure of phopshatidylserine and the expression of tissue factor and MPs have been described in clinical studies as possible diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for VTE. This review will provide a novel perspective on the current knowledge and research trends on the possible role of MPs in hereditary thrombophilia and APS. Basically, the published data show that circulating MPs may contribute to the development of VTE in thrombophilic carriers, both in mild and severe states. Moreover, the presence of endothelial-MPs and platelet-MPs has been described in antiphospholipid syndrome and seems to be directly linked to antiphospholipid antibodies and not to other underlying autoimmune disorders or the thrombotic event itself. In conclusion, circulating MPs may constitute an epiphenomenon of thrombophilia itself and could be up-regulated in acute particular conditions, promoting a global prothrombotic state up to the threshold of the clinical relevant thrombotic event.

Thrombophilia Screening: Universal, Selected, or Neither?

The utility of thrombophilia testing in clinical practice is still a matter of debate because studies have not shown a benefit in the reduction of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in patients with thrombosis, despite the clearly higher VTE risk for first thrombosis. Screening for thrombophilia is indicated in selected patients. Particularly in selected young patients, especially women of childbearing age, the knowledge of the genetic thrombophilic defect may help in specific situations to decrease the risk of VTE events. Avoidance of modifiable risk factors and/or prophylactic thromboembolic procedures may be evaluated in selected patients. A comprehensive workup including personal and familial history, clinical examination, and laboratory test results including hereditary thrombophilia remains helpful in assessing the cumulative risk and the management of this group of selected patients.

Genetic Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in the East Algerian Population

Many genetic risk factors have been identified for causing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Most of them affect the function of natural anticoagulant pathways, particularly the protein C system, although recent studies suggest a role of components of the hematopoietic pathway in the etiology of venous thrombosis. In this case–control study, we aimed to determine the frequency of prothrombin G20210A and factor V Leiden (FVL) G1691A polymorphisms and protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III deficiencies in the East Algerian population and to investigate whether these genetic factors are associated with VTE. On the other hand, our study tends to evaluate the status of JAK2V617F and calreticulin (CALR) mutations among these cases. The participants consisted of 121 cases with VTE and 146 healthy controls. Polymorphisms of FVL G1691A and prothrombin G20210A were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism. JAK2-V617F and calreticulin mutations were analyzed by quantitative PCR and PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis sequencing, respectively. Protein C, protein S, and antithrombin levels were determined and then hereditary deficiencies were identified. Of all cases and controls, none was a carrier of the antithrombin III deficiency, prothrombin gene G20210A, and CALR mutations. Only 1 case reported having a positive JAK2 mutation (mutant allele burden was 15%). The FVL mutation (GA/AA) was found in 14 (11.6%) cases and 2 (1.4%) controls and it was significantly different between both the groups ( P = .001). Deficiencies of protein S and protein C were detected in 17 (18.8%) cases. The univariate analysis resulted in a significant impact of FVL (odds ratio [OR] = 9.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1-42.3; P = .003) and of protein S deficiency (OR = 16.9, 95% CI =2.1-132.8, P = .007) on the VTE status. Both factors stayed significant after adjustment for sex and age. The OR of the protein C deficiency was slightly elevated (OR = 6.4, 95% CI = 0.7-55.5), but it did not reach the level of statistical significance ( P = .091), and it was therefore not considered as a risk factor. In conclusion, coagulant factor V gene G1691A mutation and protein S deficiency constitute important genetic risk factors in patients with VTE in Eastern Algeria. The somatic mutation of JAK2 V617F and CALR mutations are less frequent causes of VTE, thus routine testing for these mutations is not recommended.

Prothrombotic risk factors and antithrombotic therapy in children with ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

Congenital and acquired prothrombotic disorders have been highlighted in a recent series of cerebrovascular stroke (CVS), with a controversial role in pathogenesis. The aim is to study some prothrombotic risk factors [activated protein C (APC) resistance, von Willebrand factor (vWF), anticardiolpin (ACL) antibodies and plasma homocysteine] in children with ischemic stroke, and to evaluate the role of aspirin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in its management in relation to outcome.

METHODS

A total of 37 cases aged from 1 month to 15 years ( mean ± standard deviation 26.2 ± 35.7 months), diagnosed as ischemic stroke (>24 hours) were recruited. Complete blood count, prothrombin time and concentration, partial thromboplastin time, serum electrolytes, random blood sugar, C-reactive protein, electrocardiogram and echocardiography were done. Levels of APC resistance, vWF, ACL antibodies [immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM)] and plasma homocysteine were estimated. A total of 25 cases received aspirin 3-5 mg /kg/d and 12 patients received LMWH as initial dose at 75 international units (IU)/kg subcutaneously (SC) then 10-25 IU/kg/day for 15 days in a nonrandomized fashion.

RESULTS

The levels of APC resistance, vWF, ACL antibodies (IgG and IgM) and plasma homocysteine were significantly higher in stroke cases than in controls. There was no significant difference between cases treated with aspirin and those with LMWH in all prothrombotic factors. Significant positive correlations were found between vWF and ACL antibodies (IgG and IgM) levels before treatment. Significant decrease in cognitive function was detected between cases treated with LMWH and those treated with aspirin.

CONCLUSION

Ischemic CVS in children is multifactorial. Thrombophilia testing should be performed in any child with CVS. Early use of aspirin improves the prognosis and has less effect on cognitive function.

Influence of proband’s characteristics on the risk for venous thromboembolism in relatives with factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms

The risk for venous thromboembolism in relatives with factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A differs according to the probands’ selection. Relatives belonging to families with heterozygous probands with venous thromboembolism have the highest risk for venous thromboembolism.

Medical management of venous thromboembolism: what the interventional radiologist needs to know

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are considered manifestations of the same pathophysiological process and are together referred to as venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is a common disorder with an incidence of 1 to 3 in 1000 in the general population. It is estimated that the incidence of VTE is likely to increase as the average life expectancy of the U.S. population increases. Treatment of VTE consists of anticoagulation; the duration of anticoagulation is largely determined by the circumstances surrounding development of the thrombotic event. Vitamin K antagonists, the only oral anticoagulants approved for treatment of VTE in the United States, have several drawbacks and therefore new oral anticoagulants are currently in various stages of development. This review focuses on the risk factors for VTE and the approach to determining the duration of anticoagulation in patients with VTE. Results of clinical trials on the new oral anticoagulants that may soon be licensed for the treatment of VTE are also discussed.

Low borderline plasma levels of antithrombin, protein C and protein S are risk factors for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Inherited deficiencies of antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC) and protein S (PS) are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). They are usually defined by laboratory cut-offs (in our setting 81, 70 and 63 IU dL(-1), respectively), which give only a rough idea of the VTE risk associated with plasma levels of these proteins.

OBJECTIVES

 We investigated whether the risk of VTE associated with the plasma deficiencies of AT, PC or PS has a dose-response effect, and whether low borderline levels of these proteins are associated with an increased risk of VTE, both in the whole study population and separately in carriers of either factor V Leiden or G20210A prothrombin gene mutation.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A case-control study of 1401 patients with a first objectively-documented VTE and 1847 healthy controls has been carried out.

RESULTS

A dose-response effect on the VTE risk was observed for all the three anticoagulant proteins. Compared with individuals with AT, PC or PS levels > 100 IU/dL, the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of VTE was 2.00 (1.44-2.78) for AT levels between 76 and 85 IUdL(-1) , 2.21 (1.54-3.18) and 1.84 (1.31-2.59) for PC and PS levels between 61 and 75 IUdL(-1) . The risk of unprovoked VTE in factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A carriers appears 2 to 3-fold increased when levels of AT or PS are low borderline.

CONCLUSIONS

 Low borderline plasma levels of AT, PC and PS are associated with a 2-fold increased risk of VTE and should be considered in the assessment of the individual VTE risk.

Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review article

Thrombosis is a well-known clinical entity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and it is multifactorial. The most important risk factor is the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs). However, approximately 40% of adults with SLE who are negative for APL A are diagnosed with thrombosis, indicating the importance of other risk factors. Thus, the thrombosis risk factors should be evaluated extensively and regularly and treated aggressively in every patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Risk of obstetric and thromboembolic complications in family members of women with previous adverse obstetric outcomes carrying common inherited thombophilias

BACKGROUND

Factor (F)V Leiden and the prothrombin 20210A mutation (PTm) are associated with the occurrence of obstetric complications, including pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is not known whether family members of women with FV Leiden or PTm and previous obstetric complications have a higher risk of VTE or adverse obstetric outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective family study including 563 relatives of 177 women with previous adverse outcomes carrying FV Leiden or PTm, referred between April 1993 and June 2010. A history of obstetric complications and VTE was obtained. Prevalence of VTE and obstetric complications in relatives with and without inherited thrombophilias was compared. Adjusted odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression models that controlled for predictors (age, FV Leiden and PTm).

RESULTS

Relatives carrying FV Leiden had a significant and independent risk for obstetric complications (OR: 1.98, 95% CI 1.03-3.83); this risk was not observed in the presence of PTm (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.46-2.32). The presence of FV Leiden or PTm in heterozygosis was significantly and independently associated with the occurrence of VTE (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.70-15.91). Severe thrombophilias were strong risk factors for VTE (OR: 23.2, 95% CI: 6.0-89.85). Male gender was a significant and independent risk factor for VTE (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.51-8.05). The risk did not change when relatives of women with a previous pregnancy-related VTE were excluded (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.51-8.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of thrombophilia status may help to better define the obstetric and thromboembolic risks in asymptomatic family members of women who suffered from obstetric complications.

Epidemiology of Prothrombin G20210A Mutation in the Mediterranean Region

There are many genetic and acquired risk factors that are known to cause venous thromboembolic disorders (VTE). One of these is the Prothrombin G20210A mutation, which has been identified in 1996. Prothrombin G20210A mutation causes higher levels of the clotting factor prothrombin in the blood of carriers, which creates a higher tendency towards blood clotting (hypercoagulability), and therefore the carriers become at higher risk of developing VTE. High prevalence of Prothrombin G20210A mutation was reported in Caucasian populations, but the prevalence was almost absent in non-Caucasians. That was most obvious in countries of South Europe and the Mediterranean region. This review article discusses Prothrombin G20210A mutation, how it causes VTE, the origin of the mutation, and its distribution worldwide with special concentration on the Mediterranean area.

Evidence-based approach to thrombophilia testing

Thrombophilia can be identified in about half of all patients presenting with VTE. Testing has increased tremendously for various indications, but whether the results of such tests help in the clinical management of patients has not been settled. I use evidence from observational studies to conclude that testing for hereditary thrombophilia generally does not alter the clinical management of patients with VTE, with occasional exceptions for women at fertile age. Because testing for thrombophilia only serves limited purpose this should not be performed on a routine basis.

Thrombotic risk during oral contraceptive use and pregnancy in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation: a rational approach to contraception

Current guidelines discourage combined oral contraceptive (COC) use in women with hereditary thrombophilic defects. However, qualifying all hereditary thrombophilic defects as similarly strong risk factors might be questioned. Recent studies indicate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of a factor V Leiden mutation as considerably lower than a deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin. In a retrospective family cohort, the VTE risk during COC use and pregnancy (including postpartum) was assessed in 798 female relatives with or without a heterozygous, double heterozygous, or homozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. Overall, absolute VTE risk in women with no, single, or combined defects was 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.21), 0.35 (0.22-0.53), and 0.94 (0.47-1.67) per 100 person-years, while these were 0.19 (0.07-0.41), 0.49 (0.18-1.07), and 0.86 (0.10-3.11) during COC use, and 0.73 (0.30-1.51), 1.97 (0.94-3.63), and 7.65 (3.08-15.76) during pregnancy. COC use and pregnancy were independent risk factors for VTE, with highest risk during pregnancy postpartum, as demonstrated by adjusted hazard ratios of 16.0 (8.0-32.2) versus 2.2 (1.1-4.0) during COC use. Rather than strictly contraindicating COC use, we advocate that detailed counseling on all contraceptive options, including COCs, addressing the associated risks of both VTE and unintended pregnancy, enabling these women to make an informed choice.

Factor V Leiden and FII 20210 testing in thromboembolic disorders

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin (F2) c.20210G>A mutation detection are very important in order to define the increased relative risk for venous thromboembolism in selected patients. Use of DNA-based methods to detect both mutations has become widely available in clinical diagnostic laboratories, including fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). The latter is a rapid, simple, robust and reliable method to identify genotypes of interest. There are several chemistries used for qPCR; this article describes their principles and applicability for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin (F2) c.20210G>A mutation detection.

Neonatal renal vein thrombosis and prothrombotic risk

A case of extensive deep venous thrombosis in a four a day old infant was presented. Unusually this patient was shown to be heterozygous for three thrombophilia genes; Factor V Leiden, prothrombin and antithrombin gene mutations, the latter being novel.

CONCLUSION

There are no randomized controlled trials to guide management in deep venous thrombosis in the newborn but knowledge of the prothrombotic risk factors may help direct treatment.

Follow-up of a major linkage peak on chromosome 1 reveals suggestive QTLs associated with essential hypertension: GenNet study

Essential hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor and a large proportion of this risk is genetic. Identification of genomic regions consistently associated with hypertension has been difficult in association studies to date as this requires large sample sizes.We previously published a large genome-wide linkage scan in Americans of African (AA) and European (EA) descent in the GenNet Network of the Family Blood Pressure Program (FBPP). A highly significant linkage peak was identified on chr1q spanning a region of 100 cM. In this study, we genotyped 1569 SNPs under this linkage peak in 2379 individuals to identify whether common genetic variants were associated with blood pressure (BP) at this locus.Our analysis, using two different family-based association tests, provides suggestive evidence (P< or =2 x 10(-5)) for a collection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with BP. In EAs, using diastolic BP as a quantitative phenotype, three variants located in or near the GPA33, CD247, and F5 genes, emerge as our top hits; for systolic BP, variants in GPA33, CD247, and REN are our best findings. No variant in AAs came close to suggestive evidence after multiple-test corrections (P> or =8 x 10(-5)). In summary, we show that systematic follow-up of a linkage signal can help discover candidate variants for essential hypertension that require a follow-up in yet larger samples. The failure to identify common variants is either because of low statistical power or the existence of rare coding variants in specific families or both, which require additional studies to clarify.

Massive Pulmonary Embolism Associated With Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin, and Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Mutations in a Young Patient on Oral Contraceptive Pills: A Case Report

Factor V Leiden (Factor V G1691A), prothrombin gene mutation G20210A, and homozygous C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene are known to predispose venous thromboembolism (VTE). We present herein a rare case of a young woman heterozygous for these mutations and taking oral contraceptive pills for less than 2 months, diagnosed to have massive deep venous thrombosis and bilateral pulmonary embolism. The patient was managed for 10 days in the hospital and discharged home on oral anticoagulants. This case suggests that screening for these factors in people with family history of thrombosis and in relatives of patients with these mutations is highly recommended to prevent fatal consequences. In addition, a new guideline for treatment and prophylaxis with anticoagulant for these patients and others who are at risk of developing VTE (American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP] guidelines-Chest 2008) has been published recently. Our recommendation is to promote for the internationally published algorithms through their application, where necessary, to prevent any future thrombotic morbidity or mortality incidents.

Fator V de Leiden na doença de Legg-Calvé-Perthes

Trobofilias hereditárias têm sido implicadas na patogênese da doenca de Legg-Calvé-Perthes. Uma investigação do fator de risco hereditário mais comum para hipercoagulabilidade - a mutação no gene do fator V (fator V de Leiden) - foi conduzida em 20 pacientes com Legg-Calvé-Perthes e 214 controles sadios. A prevalência do fator V de Leiden foi maior nos pacientes com Legg-Calvé-Perthes que no grupo controle (30 vs. 1,87%). A razão de chances (odds ratio) para o desenvolvimento de Legg-Calvé-Perthes foi de 22,5 (p<0,05; intervalo de confiança: 5,68- 89.07). Estes dados sugerem, o fator V de Leiden como fator de risco hereditário para hipercoagulabilidade associada ao desenvolvimento da doença de Legg-Calvé-Perthes.

The risk of first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium in double heterozygotes for factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A

BACKGROUND

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy in double heterozygous carriers of factor (F) V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A is not established. Hence, whether or not these women deserve antithrombotic prophylaxis when pregnant is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the frame of a multicenter family study, 52 double heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A who had remained pregnant at least once before knowledge of thrombophilia, were retrospectively investigated with respect to the occurrence of first VTE during pregnancy and puerperium. They were compared with 104 heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden, 104 of prothrombin G20210A and 104 women without thrombophilia.

RESULTS

Double heterozygotes were similar to single heterozygous carriers and non-carriers for the age at first pregnancy, age at testing and rate of full-term pregnancies. No VTE during pregnancy was observed in the four groups of women, whereas in the puerperium it occurred in two double carriers (1.8% of pregnancies, 95% CI: 0.5-6.3), three single FV Leiden carriers (1.5%, 0.5-4.3), two single prothrombin G20210A carriers (1%, 0.2-3.6) and one non-carrier (0.4%, 0-2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of first VTE during pregnancy and puerperium in double heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A is low and similar to that of single carriers. As for single heterozygotes, antithrombotic prophylaxis in asymptomatic double heterozygous carriers appears to be justified only in puerperium.

The scientific basis for evaluation and management of thrombotic disorders

The hemostatic mechanisms at work in the body involve a complex series of interactions between platelets, the endothelium, and the coagulation cascade. Much has been learned regarding the molecular mechanisms governing these intricate processes. The hypercoagulable state involves a disruption of the normal homeostatic equilibrium. This state may be either inherent or acquired. The prevention of associated thromboembolic complications requires therapeutic anticoagulation. A broader understanding of the factors contributing to these prothrombotic tendencies and the subtleties involved in their management provides the surgeon with another weapon in the armamentarium to promote better and safer patient outcomes.

Management of inherited von Willebrand disease in 2007

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder and is due to quantitative (types 1 and 3) or qualitative (type 2) defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is inherited by autosomal dominant or recessive patterns, but women with mild forms are more symptomatic. VWD is classified in six VWD types (1, 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N, 3) with peculiar phenotype and genotype. The ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) is the most useful test for VWD diagnosis, because it can mimic the interactions of VWF with its platelet receptor. Knowledge of the segments of VWF involved in the binding to its receptor and to factor VIII prompted the search for mutations in specific exons of the VWF gene, with mutations causing VWD types 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N localized in exons 18-28. In case of VWD types 1 and 3 the mutations are spread within the entire gene. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice for type 1 VWD because it can induce release of normal VWF from cellular compartments. In type 3 and in severe forms of types 1 and 2 VWD, DDAVP is not effective and plasma virally inactivated VWF concentrates should be used in bleedings, surgery, and secondary long-term prophylaxis.

Testing for thrombophilia: an evidence-based approach

Thrombophilia is a disorder of haemostasis in which there is a tendency for the occurrence of thrombosis. This tendency can be inherited or acquired. This review outlines common acquired and inherited thrombophilic conditions and discusses indications for testing. It is concluded that testing for acquired thrombophilic conditions should be considered in all cases of venous thrombosis, whereas testing for inherited thrombophilic conditions is unlikely to be helpful. If testing for inherited thrombophilia is to be carried out, the benefits, pitfalls and unwanted consequences of such testing should be taken into account.

Inferior vena cava thrombosis causing acute cauda equina syndrome

The authors report a case of a 16-year-old girl who presented with a 1-week history of progressive low-back pain, buttock paresthesias, and bilateral lower extremity pain and weakness. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR venography studies of her lumbar spine revealed engorgement of the epidural venous plexus and mild compression of the cauda equina. A lower extremity and pelvic venogram revealed occlusive thrombosis of the femoral and iliac veins as well as of the inferior vena cava (IVC). The patient required an IVC thrombectomy due to progressive symptoms, after which she improved and returned to baseline status in 1 week. Imaging studies afterwards showed resolution of the venous engorgement and decompression of the cauda equina. This is the second published report of an association between IVC thrombosis and cauda equina syndrome.

Genomic medicine and thrombotic risk: Who, when, how and why?

Major advances in Human Genome research could significantly change the clinical medical practice, providing new possibilities for both diagnosing and treating common pathologies. Many genetic tests are now commercially available for predicting future risk of common disorders. However, genetic testing has potential benefits but also limitations for the patients, and it should not be used to 'screen' the general population. Diagnostic assays for a predisposition of both venous and arterial thrombosis are among the most requested genetic tests in molecular diagnostics laboratories. However, there is considerable uncertainty as to how this information should be utilized in patient management. Both the medical community and the patients need to obtain accurate information concerning the appropriate use of genetic testing. The purpose of this article is to discuss the usefulness and the practical applications of thrombotic genetic testing in order to define which patients should be tested for both venous and arterial thrombotic risk as well as to have an acceptable cost/benefit ratio and to prevent patients' anxiety.

Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: congenital and acquired risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the thrombotic tendency in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by evaluating congenital or acquired abnormalities associated with an increased risk of venous and/or arterial thrombosis.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients with SLE were included in the study. Twenty-one patients (37%) had a history of arterial and/or venous thrombosis and 36 patients (63%) did not have such a history. Sera from 50 healthy controls were examined. Protein C, protein S, antithrombin, D-dimer, fibrinogen, homocysteine, anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LAC), prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene mutation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Protein C, antithrombin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and homocysteine levels were significantly higher in patients with SLE than in controls. A prothrombin mutation was observed in 2 (4%) of 50 controls and in 6 (11%) of 57 patients. A significantly higher prevalence (P = 0.036) of MTHFR homozygous mutation was observed in patients with SLE (14 [25%] of 57) in comparison with controls (4 [8%] of 50). IgG-aCL and IgM-aCL levels were significantly higher in patients with SLE than in controls (P < 0.0001). The presence of medium-high (> or = 20 IgG phospholipid units/ml) IgG-aCL antibody titers was significantly higher (P = 0.005) in patients with thrombosis (11 [52%] of 21) than in patients without (5 [14%] of 36) thrombosis. LAC was present in 22 (38.5%) of 57 patients and in none of 50 controls.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we confirm the association between thrombosis and IgG-aCL at medium-high titers and suggest that the coexistence of other risk factors can affect the expression of thrombosis in patients with SLE.

Technical standards and guidelines: Venous thromboembolism (Factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210G>A testing): A disease-specific supplement to the standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories

These standards and guidelines are designed primarily as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory genetic services. Adherence to this statement does not necessarily ensure a successful medical outcome. These standards and guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the clinical molecular geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the laboratory record the rationale for any significant deviation from these standards and guidelines.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiency associated with the HR2 haplotype of factor V: a family cohort study

In order to assess whether the HR2 haplotype of the factor V gene (HR2) increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in carriers of antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC) or S (PS) defects, we performed this determination in 336 subjects, who were family members of 66 symptomatic patients with clotting inhibitors defects. We first assessed the presence of previous VTE, and then followed prospectively subjects without prior VTE. VTE episodes had occurred in 26 individuals: 18 in 139 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects alone (annual incidence, 0.55%), four in 33 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects combined with HR2 (0.52%) and four in 151 non-carriers (0.1%), resulting in a relative risk (RR) for VTE of 4.9 (95% CI: 1.7-14.4) and 4.62 (95% CI: 1.2-18.4), respectively. After an overall follow-up of 2557 patient-years, VTE episodes developed in 12 subjects: nine in 121 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects alone (annual incidence, 0.92%), three in 29 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects combined with HR2 (1.0%) and none in 147 non-carriers. In family members of patients with AT, PC or PS defects the coinheritance of HR2 haplotype does not seem to increase the thromboembolic risk.

Acquired Activated Protein C Resistance Associated with IgG Antibodies against β2-Glycoprotein I and Prothrombin as a Strong Risk Factor for Venous Thromboembolism

Background: Venous thromboembolic events such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are common manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome. Our aim was to clarify the roles of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods and Results: We examined anti-cardiolipin/β2-glycoprotein I (anti-CL/β2-GPI) antibody concentrations, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) antibody concentrations, and lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity in 87 patients with SLE (21 with VTE and 66 without thrombosis). Both anti-CL/β2-GPI and anti-PS/PT antibodies strongly correlated with LA activity. Multivariate logistic analysis confirmed that both anti-CL/β2-GPI and anti-PS/PT antibodies were significant independent risk factors for VTE (odds ratios = 4.98 and 7.54, respectively; 95% confidence intervals, 1.51–16.4 and 2.30–24.7, respectively). We therefore studied the in vitro effects of IgG fractions containing anti-CL/β2-GPI or anti-PS/PT antibodies on the anticoagulant activity of activated protein C (APC) and found that purified IgG containing anti-CL/β2-GPI or anti-PS/PT antibodies significantly hampered the anticoagulant activity of APC. We also studied the ability of IgG fractions to impede the anticoagulant activity of APC before and after complete removal of anti-CL/β2-GPI or anti-PS/PT antibodies by adsorption. Removal of anti-CL/β2-GPI or anti-PS/PT antibodies from all positive IgG samples clearly decreased the inhibitory effect of those samples on APC anticoagulant activity.

Conclusions: Anti-CL/β2-GPI and anti-PS/PT antibodies independently cause APC resistance, which may contribute to risk of VTE in patients with SLE.

Genetic thrombophilia

The genetic thrombophilias are an important cause of venous thrombotic events. Much has been learned about the natural history of these disorders, their genetics, and, to a lesser degree, their treatment. This article provides an overview of the genetics of thrombophilia. Specific information on the factor V Leiden mutation;the prothrombin G20210A mutation; and protein C, proteinS, and antithrombin deficiency is reviewed. Current testing and treatment options for the genetic thrombophilias also are discussed.

GENETIC TESTING IN PRIMARY CARE

Rapid advances in genetic research are leading to an expanding array of genetic tests. Primary care providers will increasingly be challenged to identify patients whose symptoms, physical findings, or family history indicate the need for genetic testing, and to determine how to use genetic information most effectively to improve disease prevention. In addressing these challenges, practitioners will need to consider the range of different uses of genetic testing, including diagnosis in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, risk assessment, reproductive decision-making, and population screening. They will need a set of core skills and knowledge to evaluate family history and to recognize clinical findings that indicate genetic risk. At the same time, the primary care perspective will contribute to the evaluation of appropriate uses of genetic testing. A partnership between medical genetics and primary care will help to ensure the development of effective policies, educational tools, and practice guidelines for the coming era of genomic health care.

Perinatal outcome in women with severe pregnancy complications and multiple thrombophilias

Hypercoagulability leading to placental thrombosis has been implicated in severe pregnancy complications. We compared the perinatal outcome in women with severe preeclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and severe abruptio placentae and multiple acquired and inherited thrombophilias (study group, n=22) to matched women with similar complications and single thrombophilia (control group, n=22). Gestational age at delivery and birth weight were significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group (p<0.01) and among the study women with severe preeclampsia and IUGR. Severe pregnancy complications may occur earlier during pregnancy and more seriously affect perinatal outcome in women with multiple thrombophilias.

Hormones and pregnancy: thromboembolic risks for women

During their lifetimes, women face several unique situations with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Doctors in a variety of specialties must advise women on the risks of oral contraceptives (OC), hormone replacement or pregnancy. Modern 'low dose' OC are associated with a three to sixfold increased relative risk of VTE. Hormone replacement and selective oestrogen receptor modulators confer a similar two to fourfold increase in thrombotic risk. However, because the baseline incidence of thrombosis is higher in older postmenopausal women, the absolute risk is higher than in younger OC users. The risk of venous thrombosis is six to 10-fold higher during pregnancy than in non-pregnant women of similar age. Thrombophilic disorders increase the thrombotic risk of OC, hormone replacement and pregnancy, especially in women with homozygous or combined defects. This review focuses on recent data estimating the thrombotic risk of hormonal therapies and pregnancy in women with and without other thrombotic risk factors.

Genetics in rheumatoid arthritis

This chapter reviews the latest original research on the genetics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with a focus on its relevance for the clinical rheumatologist. The following questions will be dealt with in order to appreciate the recent progress in this field. * Why is a knowledge of genetics useful for an understanding of the pathogenesis of RA? * Is a knowledge of genetic risk factors relevant for day-to-day clinical practice? * What methods are used for identifying genetic risk factors? * Which genetic regions have been identified in susceptibility to RA? * What risk factors have been identified? * What are the future prospects and research agenda?

Management of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) probably increases 2-4-fold in pregnancy and is higher after a caesarean section than after vaginal delivery. Management of VTE in pregnancy is challenging. Many diagnostic tests are less accurate in pregnant than in non-pregnant patients and some radiologic procedures expose the fetus to ionizing radiation, although this can be reduced by taking appropriate precautions. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) is the test of choice for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), whereas for PE, V/Q lung scan is the first-line test, followed by CUS if the results are non-diagnostic. Anticoagulants that have been evaluated for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnancy include heparin and heparin compounds, and coumarin derivatives. When determining the optimal treatment regimens, it is important to consider: (i) the safety of the drug for the fetus and mother; (ii) the efficacy of the regimen; and (iii) the dose regimens for acute and secondary treatment, and during delivery and postpartum. Heparins are safer than coumarins for the fetus, as they do not cross the placental barrier. Heparins, particularly unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) tend also to be safer for the mother than other compounds. Of the two, LMWHs, although more expensive, are associated with lower rates of bleeding complications, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis, than UFH, and should therefore be the treatment of choice in VTE during pregnancy. Patients with prior VTE or a hypercoagulable state have an increased risk of VTE during pregnancy. Depending on the presence of one or both of these factors, clinical surveillance, with anticoagulant treatment where necessary, is recommended.

Asymptomatic carriership of factor V Leiden and genotypes of the fibrinogen gene cluster

We investigated the role of frequent fibrinogen polymorphisms in venous thromboembolic disease in conjunction with inherited thrombophilia. Two hundred unrelated subjects, all carriers of the factor V R506Q mutation (FV Leiden), were genotyped at the fibrinogen gene cluster. Among these subjects, 100 had experienced previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) and 100 were still asymptomatic for VTE. Significant differences were observed between the groups for the BclI polymorphism (P = 0.004). Scanning, by sequencing the DNA regions flanking the BclI marker, revealed new polymorphisms, a C to T transition and a G to T transversion at 1520 and 3369 base pairs 3' to the beta gene stop codon respectively. These markers showed less association with the clinical phenotype than BclI itself. A combined genotype including 10 markers was more frequent among the asymptomatic subjects (17%) than among patients (3%), and was associated with a reduction in fibrinogen antigen level (2.42 +/- 0.35 vs 2.69 +/- 0.41 g/l, P = 0.028) among the asymptomatic subjects. Our data suggest that, in the presence of inherited thrombophilia, frequent fibrinogen polymorphisms may interact to modulate the risk of venous thromboembolism.