Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Review of Imaging Modalities with Special Focus on Pathology Concordance

Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer. It is characterized by a unique growth pattern making it difficult to detect on conventional breast imaging. ILC can be multicentric, multifocal, and bilateral, with a high likelihood of incomplete excision after breast-conserving surgery. We reviewed the conventional as well as newly emerging imaging modalities for detecting and determining the extent of ILC- and compared the main advantages of MRI vs. contrast-enhanced mammogram (CEM). Our review of the literature finds that MRI and CEM clearly surpass conventional breast imaging in terms of sensitivity, specificity, ipsilateral and contralateral cancer detection, concordance, and estimation of tumor size for ILC. Both MRI and CEM have each been shown to enhance surgical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed ILC that had one of these imaging modalities added to their preoperative workup.

Association of variably methylated tumour DNA regions with overall survival for invasive lobular breast cancer

Background

Tumour DNA methylation profiling has shown potential to refine disease subtyping and improve the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of breast cancer. However, limited data exist regarding invasive lobular breast cancer (ILBC). Here, we investigated the genome-wide variability of DNA methylation levels across ILBC tumours and assessed the association between methylation levels at the variably methylated regions and overall survival in women with ILBC.

Methods

Tumour-enriched DNA was prepared by macrodissecting formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue from 130 ILBCs diagnosed in the participants of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS). Genome-wide tumour DNA methylation was measured using the HumanMethylation 450K (HM450K) BeadChip array. Variably methylated regions (VMRs) were identified using the DMRcate package in R. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between methylation levels at the ten most significant VMRs and overall survival. Gene set enrichment analyses were undertaken using the web-based tool Metaspace. Replication of the VMR and survival analysis findings was examined using data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 168 ILBC cases. We also examined the correlation between methylation and gene expression for the ten VMRs of interest using TCGA data.

Results

We identified 2771 VMRs (P < 10⁻⁸) in ILBC tumours. The ten most variably methylated clusters were predominantly located in the promoter region of the genes: ISM1, APC, TMEM101, ASCL2, NKX6, HIST3H2A/HIST3H2BB, HCG4P3, HES5, CELF2 and EFCAB4B. Higher methylation level at several of these VMRs showed an association with reduced overall survival in the MCCS. In TCGA, all associations were in the same direction, however stronger than in the MCCS. The pooled analysis of the MCCS and TCGA data showed that methylation at four of the ten genes was associated with reduced overall survival, independently of age and tumour stage; APC: Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence interval) per one-unit M-value increase: 1.18 (1.02–1.36), TMEM101: 1.23 (1.02–1.48), HCG4P3: 1.37 (1.05–1.79) and CELF2: 1.21 (1.02–1.43). A negative correlation was observed between methylation and gene expression for CELF2 (R = − 0.25, P = 0.001), but not for TMEM101 and APC.

Conclusions

Our study identified regions showing greatest variability across the ILBC tumour genome and found methylation at several genes to potentially serve as a biomarker of survival for women with ILBC.

Lobular Breast Cancer: Different Disease, Different Algorithms?

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer, with a unique pathogenesis and distinct clinical biology. ILCs display a characteristic loss of E-cadherin, are largely estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative, and low to intermediate grade. These features portend a favorable prognosis, but there is a tendency for late recurrences and atypical metastases. ILCs tend to be insidious and infiltrative, which can pose a challenge for diagnosis, and emerging data suggest they may have a propensity for a differing response to standard therapies.

Impact of Preoperative Breast MR Imaging and MR-guided Surgery on Diagnosis and Surgical Outcome of Women with Invasive Breast Cancer with and without DCIS Component

Purpose To (a) compare the diagnostic accuracy of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of conventional imaging (digital mammography and breast ultrasonography) in the identification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) components of biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer before surgery and (b) investigate the surgical outcome (positive margin rates and mastectomy rates) of women with breast cancer who underwent preoperative MR imaging combined with MR-guided needle biopsy and/or MR-guided lesion localization or bracketing where appropriate. Materials and Methods The authors performed a prospective two-center study of 593 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer who underwent breast MR imaging in addition to conventional imaging. MR-guided vacuum biopsy and MR-guided lesion bracketing were performed for DCIS components visible at MR imaging alone. The accuracy of breast MR imaging was compared with that of conventional imaging, and surgical outcomes (positive margin and mastectomy rates) were investigated. Results Surgical-pathologic assessment demonstrated DCIS components in 139 of the 593 women (23.4%). The sensitivity of MR imaging for the diagnosis of DCIS components pre-operatively (84.9%; 118 of 139) was significantly higher than that of conventional imaging (36.7%; 51 of 139) (P < .0001); more than half of DCIS components (51.1%; 71 of 139) were detected only with MR imaging. The sensitivity advantage of MR imaging over conventional imaging increased with increasing relative size of DCIS components, as follows: The sensitivity of MR imaging versus conventional imaging for small, marginal DCIS components was 56.8% (21 of 37) versus 29.7% (11 of 37); the sensitivity for extensive DCIS components was 91.7% (55 of 60) versus 41.7% (25 of 60); the sensitivity for large, predominant DCIS components was 100.0% (42 of 42) versus 35.7% (15 of 42). Moreover, the sensitivity advantage of MR imaging over conventional imaging increased with increasing nuclear grade of DCIS components, as follows: The sensitivity of MR imaging versus conventional imaging for low-grade DCIS components was 74.0% (20 of 27) versus 40.7% (11 of 27); the sensitivity for intermediate-grade DCIS components was 84.1% (53 of 63) versus 34.9% (22 of 63); the sensitivity for high-grade DCIS components was 91.8% (45 of 49) versus 36.7% (18 of 49) (P < .05-.001 for all). Positive margin rates were low overall (3.7% [95% Clopper Pearson confidence interval [CI]: 2.3%, 5.6%]) and did not differ significantly between the 139 women with DCIS components (5.0% [95% CI: 2.0%, 10.1%]) compared with the 454 women without such components (3.3% [95% CI: 1.9%, 5.4%]). The same was true for mastectomy rates (10.8% [95% CI: 6.2%, 17.2%] vs 8.1% [95% CI: 5.8%, 11.1%]). Conclusion Breast MR imaging improves depiction of DCIS components of invasive breast cancers before surgery and is associated with positive margin and mastectomy rates that are low irrespective of the presence or absence of DCIS components. ^© RSNA, 2017.

How to measure breast cancer tumoral size at MR imaging?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of different MR sequences to measure tumor size.

METHODS

Eighty-six women (mean age: 53 years (30-78)) who underwent preoperative MRI for breast cancer were included. Maximal diameters of the index tumor (IT) and of the whole extent of the tumor (WET) were measured on T2-weighted (T2W) sequences, on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-weighted (T1W) sequences and on Maximal Intensity Projection (MIP) reconstructions. Agreements with pathological size were evaluated using concordance correlation coefficient (k).

RESULTS

Median pathological size of IT was 20mm (13-25 mm, interquartile range). Median pathological size of the WET was 29 mm (16-50mm, interquartile range). Measurement of IT showed a good concordance with pathological size, with best results using T2W (k = 0.690) compared to MIP (k = 0.667), early-subtracted DCE frame (k = 0.630) and early-native DCE frame (k = 0.588). IT was visible on T2W in 83.7% and accurately measured within 5mm in 69.9%. Measurement of WET was superior using early-subtracted DCE frame (k = 0.642) compared to late-native frame (k = 0.635), early-native frame (k = 0.631), late-subtracted frame (k = 0.620) and MIP (k = 0.565). However, even using early-subtracted frame, WET was accurately measured within 5mm only 39.3%.

CONCLUSION

If visible, IT size is best measured on T2W with a good accuracy (69%) whereas WET is best estimated on early-subtracted DCE frame. However, when adjacent additional sites exist around IT, suspected surrounding disease components need to be proved by pathological analysis.

Clinical-pathologic features, long term-outcome and surgical treatment in a large series of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

A retrospective analysis on 1407 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 243 invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) was performed in order to compare the histological features, the immunohistochemical characteristics, the surgical treatment and the clinical outcome in the two groups.

RESULTS

ILC seems to be more likely multifocal, estrogen receptor positive, HER-2 negative and to have a lower proliferative index compared to IDC. ILC, when treated with conservative surgery, required more frequently re-excision and/or mastectomy because of positive resection margins. No difference was observed in terms of 5-year disease free survival and local relapse free survival between the two groups, in the whole series and in the subgroup of patients treated with breast-conserving treatment.

CONCLUSION

ILC can be safely treated with conservative surgery but a more accurate preoperative evaluation of tumor size and multifocality could be advocated, in order to reduce the re-excision rate.

Are the imaging features of the pleomorphic variant of invasive lobular carcinoma different from classic ILC of the breast?

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (PILC) is different from classic invasive lobular carcinoma (CILC) in terms of radiologic and clinicopathologic features. We compared the radiologic and clinicopathologic features of 22 surgically confirmed PILCs in 21 patients from 2004 to 2009 and 47 CILCs from 47 consecutive patients. For all cases, we reviewed the imaging findings, medical records and pathological results. PILC had a higher T stage, N stage, nuclear and histologic grade compared to CILC. PILC was more commonly negative for estrogen receptors and positive for HER2 than CILC (all p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in age, symptoms, tumor size, extensive intraductal component, lymphovascular invasion, triple negative profile, or multiplicity between the two groups. PILC was not detected on mammography in 1 (4.5%) of 22 cases, whereas CILC was not detected on mammography in 7 (14.9%) of 47 cases and on MRI in 2 (5.0%) of 40 (p = 0.42 and p = 1.000, respectively). MRI identified more frequent multiplicity than mammography for both PILC and CILC (p < 0.001), but was similar to US (p = 0.066). Most lesions showed a spiculated mass or architectural distortion with or without calcifications on mammography and ultrasound. No differences in mass and/or non-mass lesions or kinetics on MRI were observed between the two groups. PILC shows more pathologically aggressive features, but cannot be differentiated from CILC based on imaging findings.

Comparison of enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) on contrast enhanced MRI of the breast and to observe the magnitude of eventual differences as these may impair the diagnostic value of breast MRI in ILC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an analysis of enhancement characteristics on biphasic breast MRI in a series of 136 patients (103 IDC, 33 ILC) using an in-house developed application for pharmacokinetic modeling of contrast enhancement and a commercially available CAD application that evaluated the contrast-enhancement versus time curve.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the most enhancing voxels in IDC had significantly higher K(trans) -values than in ILC (P < 0.01). No difference in v(e) -values was noted between groups. Visual assessment of contrast-enhancement versus time curves revealed wash-out curves to be less common in ILC (48% versus 84%). However, when using the CAD-application to assess the most malignant looking curve, the difference was blotted out (76% versus 86%).

CONCLUSION

ILC enhances slower than IDC but peak enhancement is not significantly less. The use of a CAD-application may help to determine the most malignant looking contrast-enhancement versus time curve, and hence facilitates lesion classification.

Do patients with invasive lobular breast cancer benefit in terms of adequate change in surgical therapy from a supplementary preoperative breast MRI?

BACKGROUND

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been introduced in the preoperative management of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). We analysed if MRI leads to adequate changes in surgical management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a single-centre retrospective confirmatory analysis of 92 patients with ILC and a preoperative breast MRI. By applying a blinded tumour board method, we analysed if surgical procedures were altered due to breast MRI. In case of alteration, we analysed whether the change was adequate according to the postoperative pathology findings. We considered an adequate rate of change>5% to be a clinically relevant benefit.

RESULTS

A change in surgical therapy due to the MRI findings occurred in 23 of 92 patients (25%). According to the postoperative pathology findings, this change was adequate for 20 of these patients (22%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 14%-31%, P<0.0001). An overtreatment occurred for three patients (3%; 95% CI 0%-6%) who underwent a mastectomy following the results of breast MRI. Patients with larger tumours did likely benefit more from preoperative breast MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILC might benefit from a preoperative breast MRI. Possible harm from overtreatment should be minimised by diligent use of preoperative histological clarification.

Does Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Beneficially Alter Surgical Management of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?

The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative breast MRI on patients with biopsy-proven invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) initially deemed eligible for breast conserving therapy. We analyzed a prospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven ILC that consented to undergo preoperative diagnostic MRI at our institution. Data analysis of 20 patients accrued from January 2010 through January 2011 was performed. Outcome measures included discovery of occult lesions, need for additional biopsies, change in surgical management, and need for surgical reexcision. MRI found an additional cancer in 40 per cent of patients and increased extent of disease in one patient. MRI led to eight biopsies, for a pathologically confirmed true positive rate of 82 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI) 62-101%] and only two unnecessary biopsies. Preoperative MRI beneficially altered surgical management in 42 per cent of patients (95% CI 19-65%) without leading to unnecessary surgery, and only one patient required reexcision for positive margins (5.8%, CI -5.8-17.4%). In conclusion, preoperative MRI in patients with ILC can detect additional disease that was missed by conventional workup, allowing for better preoperative planning and more appropriate oncologic resection.

Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast

AIMS

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of breast cancer is currently uncertain. The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative MRI compared to conventional imaging in detecting breast cancer and the effect of preoperative MRI on the surgical treatment in a subgroup of women with dense breasts, young age, invasive lobular cancer (ILC) or multiple lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and October 2007, 91 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent preoperative clinical breast examination, mammography, bilateral breast ultrasonography and high-resolution breast MRI. All patients had histologically verified breast cancer. The imaging techniques were compared using the final pathological report as gold standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of MRI for the main lesion was 98.9%, while for multiple lesions sensitivity was 90.7% and specificity 85.4%. After preoperative MRI, 13 patients (14.3%) underwent additional fine needle/core biopsies, 9 of whom had specimen positive for cancer. Preoperative MRI changed the surgical plan in 26 patients: in 19.8% of the cases breast conservative surgery was converted to mastectomy and in 7.7% of the patients a wider excision was performed. At a mean follow-up of 48 months, 2 local recurrences occurred (local failure rate = 2.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced sensitivity of breast MRI may change the surgical approach, by increasing mastectomy rate or suggesting the need of wider local excision. MRI can play an important role in preoperative planning if used in selected patients with high risk of multifocal/multicentric lesions. However, the histologic confirmation of all suspicious findings detected by MRI is mandatory prior to definite surgery.

Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing

OBJECTIVE

Invasive lobular (ILC) and ductal carcinomas (IDC) are the most frequent subtypes of breast cancer. Diagnosis of ILC is often challenging. This study was conducted to (1) evaluate dynamic and morphologic profiles and to (2) compare the diagnostic accuracy of IDC and ILC in magnetic resonance mammography (MRM).

METHODS

Our database consisted of all consecutive MRMs over a 12-year period (standardized protocol: T1-weighted fast low-angle shot; 0.1-mmol gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate per kilogram of body weight; T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, 1.5 T; histological verification after MRM), which were evaluated by experienced (>500 MRMs) radiologists in consensus, applying 17 predefined descriptors. All the patients gave written consent; this study was approved by the local institutional review board. Extracting all the ILCs (n = 108), IDCs (n = 347), and benign lesions (n = 436) from the database, the data set of the study was created.In ILC and IDC diagnostic accuracy of single descriptors was calculated and compared separately (chi test). Using all the descriptors, a combined binary logistic regression analysis was applied to calculate the overall diagnostic accuracy for ILC and IDC. The corresponding areas under the curve were compared.

RESULTS

ILC and IDC, showed wash-in and an irregular shape without difference (P = 1.0 and P = 0.4). Wash-out was more typical of IDC (72.6%; ILC, 57.4%; P = 0.007). Perifocal edema was diagnosed more frequently in IDC (45.5%; P = 0.05). For overall accuracy, the areas under the curve were 0.929 for ILC and 0.939 for IDC (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic and morphologic profiles of ILC and IDC were overlapping, and minor differences between both subgroups could be identified. Accordingly, the overall diagnostic accuracy of MRM was high and without difference between both subtypes of breast cancer.

The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery(BCS) of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high.Preoperative breast MRI has the potential to reduce re-excision rates, but may lead to an increased rate of mastectomies. Hence, we assessed the influence of preoperative breast MRI on the re-excision rate and the rate of mastectomies. We performed a retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients with ILC who presented in one of two dedicated tertiary cancer centers between 1993 and 2005. We assessed the initial type of surgery(BCS or mastectomy), the re-excision rate and the final type of surgery. Patients were stratified into two groups:those who received preoperative MRI (MR? group) and those who did not (MR- group). In the MR- group, 27%of the patients underwent a re-excision after initial BCS. In the MR? group, this rate was significantly lower at 9%.The odds ratio was 3.64 (95% CI: 1.30-10.20, P = 0.010).There was a trend towards a lower final mastectomy rate in the MR? group compared to the MR- group (48 vs. 59%,P = 0.098). In conclusion, preoperative MRI in patients with ILC can reduce re-excision rates without increasing the rate of mastectomies.

Clinicopathologic factors associated with involved margins after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Obtaining negative margins for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) can be difficult because of the unique histologic pattern of ILC. Our goal was to determine whether any specific patient- or disease-related factors influenced margin status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 211 patients with ILC treated from 1994 through 2004 to determine if specific clinical and pathologic factors influenced the ability to obtain negative margins.

RESULTS

We identified 110 patients (52%) who underwent total mastectomy and 101 (48%) who underwent BCS. Among patients who underwent BCS, 50 (50%) had close or positive margins. Patients with close or positive margins were more likely to have architectural distortion on ultrasonography (vs. mass or calcifications; P = .049), to have undergone excisional biopsy (vs. core or fine-needle aspiration; P = .008), and to have associated ductal carcinoma in situ (P = .021). On multivariate analysis, only biopsy method retained significance (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Core needle biopsy is the preferred method of diagnostic biopsy before surgical intervention. With appropriate patient selection, most patients with early-stage ILC can undergo successful BCS.

Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyse the influence of mammographic breast density on background enhancement (BE) at magnetic resonance (MR) mammography in pre- and postmenopausal women. In addition, we questioned predictability of contrast-enhancement dynamics of normal fibroglandular tissue (NFT) at MR mammography according to mammographic breast density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients (mean age 51.54+/-11.5 years; range 37-79 years) who underwent both MR mammography and conventional mammography were included in this retrospective study. Fourteen patients were premenopausal and 12 were postmenopausal. The ethics committee of our institution approved the study. The mammograms were retrospectively reviewed for overall breast density according to the four-point scale (I-IV) of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. Two radiologists, who were unaware of the clinical data, separately assessed the MR mammography images. Images were assessed for enhancement kinetic features (enhancement kinetic curve and the early-phase enhancement rate) and BE. MR mammography and conventional mammography findings were compared according to BI-RADS breast density category and menopausal status.

RESULTS

Percentage of increased signal intensity values during the first minute did not change according to mammographic breast density, and the mean early-phase enhancement rate scores were similar among breast density groups (p=0.942). There was no significant difference between pre- and postmenopausal groups. Enhancement kinetic features of the different groups based on BI-RADS breast density category and menopausal status were similar. There was no correlation between breast density and BE in either premenopausal (p=0.211) or in postmenopausal (p=0.735) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined no correlation between mammographic breast density and so-called BE in MR mammography in either premenopausal or postmenopausal women. NFT at MR mammography cannot be predicted on the basis of mammographic breast density.

Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management

PURPOSE

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for staging women with breast cancer, including screening for occult contralateral cancer. This article is a review and meta-analysis of studies reporting contralateral MRI in women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the evidence on contralateral MRI, calculating pooled estimates for positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive:false-positive ratio (TP:FP), and incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) over conventional imaging. Random effects logistic regression examined whether estimates were associated with study quality or clinical variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies reported contralateral malignancies detected only by MRI in 131 of 3,253 women. Summary estimates were as follows: MRI-detected suspicious findings (TP plus FP), 9.3% (95% CI, 5.8% to 14.7%); ICDR, 4.1% (95% CI, 2.7% to 6.0%), PPV, 47.9% (95% CI, 31.8% to 64.6%); TP:FP ratio, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.82). PPV was associated with the number of test positives and baseline imaging. Few studies included consecutive women, and few ascertained outcomes in all subjects. Where reported, 35.1% of MRI-detected cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ (mean size = 6.9 mm), 64.9% were invasive cancers (mean size = 9.3 mm), and the majority were stage pTis or pT1 and node negative. Effect on treatment was inconsistently reported, but many women underwent contralateral mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

MRI detects contralateral lesions in a substantial proportion of women, but does not reliably distinguish benign from malignant findings. Relatively high ICDR may be due to selection bias and/or overdetection. Women must be informed of the uncertain benefit and potential harm, including additional investigations and surgery.

[Retrospective study conducted in northern Finistère about the role of breast MRI in normal breast screening, experience in 51 patients]

OBJECTIVES

To study the role and indications of breast MRI in normal breast screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 51 patients (mean age of 51 years) conducted in northern Finistère. Each patient had a normal (BI-RADS 1 or 2) breast screening (mammography and echography). Four indications for MRI were chosen: screening of high-risk patients, high-density breasts, radio-clinical discordance, and breasts prostheses. Breast MRI were reviewed according to BI-RADS classification. Abnormalities categorized in BI-RADS 4 or 5 were confirmed histologically.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent histological analysis. Nine invasive carcinomas were identified (six invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC), two mixed carcinomas, one invasive ductal carcinoma). For these patients, the reason for performing MRI was a radio-clinical discordance.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the breast MRI value for radio-clinical discordance and the key role of MRI in diagnostic challenge of ILC. In literature review, MRI has a role even if breast screening is normal: radio-clinical discordance, screening of patients with high-risk, breasts prostheses in certain cases. Breast density comes as an additional criteria to perform this exam.

[Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging for breast cancer: pros and contras]

In oncologic patients, staging of the disease extent is of paramount importance. Imaging studies are used to decide whether the patient is a surgical candidate; if this is the case, imaging is used for detailed planning of the surgical procedure itself. Even in patients with limited prognosis, the first priority is always to achieve clear margins. Due to the widespread use of screening mammography, breast cancers are among the few cancers that are almost always diagnosed in an operable stage and are operated on with curative intention. It is well established that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is far superior to mammography (with and without concomitant ultrasound) for mapping the local extent of breast cancer. Accordingly, there is good reason to suggest that a pre-operative breast MRI should be considered an integral part of breast conserving treatment. Still, it is only rarely used in clinical practice. Arguments against its use are: Its high costs, allegedly high number of false positive findings, lack of MR-guided breast biopsy facilities, lack of evidence from randomized prospective trials and, notably, fear of "overtreatment". This paper discusses the reservations against staging MRI and weighs them against its clinical advantages. The point is made that radiologists as well as breast surgeons should be aware of the possibility of overtreatment, i.e. unnecessary mastectomy for very small, "MRI-only" multicentric cancer foci that would indeed be sufficiently treated by radiation therapy. There is a clear need to adapt the guidelines established for treatment of mammography-diagnosed multicentric breast cancer to account for the additional use of MRI for staging. Until these guidelines are available, the management of additional, "MRI-only" diagnosed small multicentric cancer manifestations must be decided on wisely and with caution. MRI for staging may only be done in institutions that can also offer an MR-guided tissue sampling, preferably by MR-guided vacuum assisted biopsy, to provide pre-operative histological proof of lesions visible by breast MRI alone.

In situ and invasive lobular neoplasia of the breast

Lobular neoplasia of the breast represents a group of related malignancies with clinical implications ranging from risk lesions [atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS)] through to aggressive invasive lesions, notably invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma. The diversity in lobular carcinoma is evident at the morphological level, at the molecular marker level and in cytogenetic profiles. Research in these areas is already changing the face of the disease group, for example suggesting that some lobular and ductal carcinomas are closely related and even that one of the lobular group, the tubulo-lobular carcinomas, should, in fact, be regarded as a ductal cancer. More research is required to understand the long-term pathogenic implications of a diagnosis of in situ lobular neoplasia, particularly pleomorphic LCIS, and to understand the genetics behind the well-recognized high risk of bilateral disease. For invasive carcinoma, molecular studies will allow refinement of therapy and the possibility of novel targeted therapies, for example directed against fibroblast growth factor receptor 1.

The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice

Compared with mammography and breast ultrasonography, contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a breast imaging technique that offers not only information on lesion cross-sectional morphology but also on functional lesion features such as tissue perfusion and enhancement kinetics. After an enthusiastic start to clinical breast MR imaging in the early 1990s, a variety of difficulties and obstacles were identified that hampered the transfer of the modality into clinical practice, including a lack of standardization regarding image acquisition and interpretation guidelines, a lack of MR-compatible interventional materials, and a lack of evidence regarding its diagnostic accuracy--particularly specificity and positive predictive value, as well as sensitivity for ductal carcinoma in situ. This article is the first of two on the current status of breast MR imaging. The pathophysiologic basis of breast MR and the effects on acquisition technique and diagnostic accuracy, the diverging demands of high spatial and temporal resolution, and the different approaches that exist for image acquisition are reviewed. Advantages and disadvantages of different pulse sequence parameters are discussed to help radiologists make a balanced and informed decision regarding choice of image acquisition protocol. Imaging findings in common benign and malignant changes are described, and current concepts for differential diagnosis, including the MR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon, are discussed. Furthermore, obstacles that impeded the technique's transfer into clinical practice are discussed, and the progress made in recent years, especially regarding the development of guidelines, procedural standardization, and MR-guided interventions are outlined.

Current Status of Breast MR Imaging Part 2. Clinical Applications

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is emerging as the most sensitive modality that is currently available for the detection of primary or recurrent breast cancer. Although this technique has been shown to be an extremely powerful diagnostic tool, it is still relatively rarely used in clinical practice, as compared with other applications of MR imaging such as for musculoskeletal or brain and spine imaging. This is the second of a two-part series on the current status of breast MR. Part two provides an overview of the use of breast MR imaging in clinical patient care, the body of evidence that supports its use. A discussion is provided on the many controversies that exist regarding breast MR imaging for preoperative staging and for screening.

The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

AIMS

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast (ILC) is known to be substantially underestimated by mammography, which makes correct planning of treatment difficult. MRI has been proposed as a valuable adjunct to mammography. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate its value, compare it to mammography and assess the possible causes of over- and underestimation of lesion size on MRI.

METHOD

The mammograms and MRI scans of 67 consecutive patients with ILC were retrieved and re-evaluated. Size measurements were correlated to the sizes extracted from the pathology report.

RESULTS

MRI measurements correlated better to pathologic size (r=0.85) than mammographic measurements (r=0.27). Underestimation of tumour size was more common on mammography (p<0.001); overestimation occurred with equal frequency (p=0.69). Overestimation on MRI, caused by non-malignant findings, was attributed to enhancing lobular carcinoma in situ.

CONCLUSION

MRI is a more accurate modality for determining tumour size in patients with ILC than mammography. The typical underestimation of lesion size by mammography can be prevented with the aid of MRI, without increasing the risk of lesion overestimation.

Value of MRI in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the surgical planning of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC)-a diagnostic challenge for radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with histologically proven ILC were studied between 1998 and 2006. All patients underwent physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. All anomalies detected were graded using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification, and careful research was made for the presence of multifocal/multicentric disease.

RESULTS

On MRI, 72% of images were visualized as masses and 18% corresponded to non-mass-like enhancements. The size correlations, compared with histological findings, were .88 (MRI; P<.001), .57 (ultrasound), .53 (physical examination), and .40 (mammography). The kappa correlations for multifocality were .87 (MRI), .22 (ultrasound), and .22 (mammography). MRI had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. Forty-nine percent of therapeutic strategy cases were modified.

CONCLUSION

MRI is unquestionably valuable for the management of ILC. It provides the most accurate estimate of tumor size and is highly sensitive for multifocal disease. Its main drawback is its lack of specificity, which requires preoperative histological verification. MRI often justifies the modification of the initial therapeutic strategy, generally ruling out conservative procedures.

Atlas of breast magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast has become important not only for assessing the extent of breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery but also for the evaluation and diagnosis of other benign and malignant pathologies. We radiologists therefore need to know the appropriate indications for performing breast MRI and understand the MRI features of breast disease. We herein review and discuss the application of current pulse sequences and the imaging strategies for MRI of breast pathologies. We will illustrate the MRI features of various breast pathologies including malignant tumors such as invasive and noninvasive ductal carcinoma, special types of invasive carcinoma (mucinous, apocrine, lobular carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, and so on), inflammatory carcinoma, semimalignant tumor (phyllodes tumor), benign tumors (fibroadenoma, intraductal and intracystic papilloma), inflammatory conditions, and postsurgical changes. We will also demonstrate three-dimensional fusion images of MR ductography and breast MRI of patients with nipple discharge.

Use of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of breast epithelial lesions

In recent years, the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast pathology has increased tremendously. It is not because the new genre of breast pathologists are less well trained than their "experienced" counterparts; it is mainly because of the demands of more accurate and precise diagnoses, identification of new entities and availability of novel antibodies. The main purpose of this review is to discuss the use of best available antibodies in diagnoses of breast epithelial lesions. The following items are discussed: assessment of invasion, IHC in papillary lesions, identification of breast tumor subtypes, IHC in proliferative breast lesions, assessment of lymphatic space invasion, diagnosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma, IHC in Paget disease, use of cytokeratins in sentinel lymph node assessment, and diagnosis of breast carcinoma at metastatic sites. Because the main focus of this review is on diagnosis, receptor studies on breast carcinoma are briefly discussed and only a few general comments are made.

MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature

Purpose

The clinical diagnosis and management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast presents difficulties. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of ILC. Small studies addressing different aspects of MRI in ILC have been presented but no large series to date. To address the usefulness of MRI in the work-up of ILC, we performed a review of the currently published literature.

Materials and methods

We performed a literature search using the query “lobular AND (MRI OR MR OR MRT OR magnetic)” in the Cochrane library, PubMed and scholar.google.com, to retrieve all articles that dealt with the use of MRI in patients with ILC. We addressed sensitivity, morphologic appearance, correlation with pathology, detection of additional lesions, and impact of MRI on surgery as different endpoints. Whenever possible we performed meta-analysis of the pooled data.

Results

Sensitivity is 93.3% and equal to overall sensitivity of MRI for malignancy in the breast. Morphologic appearance is highly heterogeneous and probably heavily influenced by interreader variability. Correlation with pathology ranges from 0.81 to 0.97; overestimation of lesion size occurs but is rare. In 32% of patients, additional ipsilateral lesions are detected and in 7% contralateral lesions are only detected by MRI. Consequently, MRI induces change in surgical management in 28.3% of cases.

Conclusion

This analysis indicates MRI to be valuable in the work-up of ILC. It provides additional knowledge that cannot be obtained by conventional imaging modalities which can be helpful in patient treatment.

A Clinical Oncology Perspective on the Use of Breast MR

MR imaging of the breast detects additional carcinoma in as many as 30% of women thought to have localized disease by clinical examination and mammography. This has led some to advocate its routine use in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer patients. However, local failure rates in patients selected for breast conservation by conventional methods are less than 5% at 10 years, suggesting that he majority of this disease is controlled with radiotherapy. The potential role of MR in the preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up of patients with early-stage breast cancer is discussed.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience

PURPOSE

To establish a pulse sequence for dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast at 3.0 T and to prospectively compare MR imaging at 3.0 T with MR imaging at 1.5 T in the same patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective intraindividual internal review board-approved study was performed in 37 women with 53 lesions (25 breast cancers, 28 benign focal lesions) who underwent contrast-enhanced dynamic bilateral subtraction MR imaging twice, once at 1.5 T with a standard technique (voxel size, 1.44 mm3) and once at 3.0 T (voxel size, 0.45-0.72 mm3) with variable repetition time and flip angle settings. Written informed consent was obtained. Sagittal single breast high-spatial-resolution MR imaging was performed with active fat suppression. Image quality, number and features of enhancing lesions, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories were compared by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and Student t test for matched pairs. Diagnostic confidence was compared by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

With repetition time prolonged to account for longer T1 relaxation times at 3.0 T and a flip angle of 60 degrees, enhancement rates at 3.0 T were substantially below those at 1.5 T. In two patients with benign lesions, enhancement was rated as insufficient to establish diagnosis. When parameter settings were kept equivalent, equivalent enhancement rates were observed with both systems. With these settings, 3.0-T MR imaging yielded homogeneous signal intensity over the entire field of view. No dielectric resonance effects were observed. Overall image quality scores for the dynamic series were slightly higher at 3.0 T (P<.01). A total of 49 lesions were prospectively identified with both systems. Owing to substantial patient motion at 1.5 T, two malignant lesions in one patient were visualized at 3.0 T only. At 3.0 T, differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions was possible with higher diagnostic confidence, as reflected by a larger area under the ROC curve (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Initial experiences indicate that contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0 T is nearing readiness for clinical use.

Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist regarding the ability to select patients with lobular carcinoma for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) using mammography. The purpose of this study was to compare the conversion rate from BCT to mastectomy among patients with lobular (ILC) and ductal carcinoma (IDC), and to compare the number of resections needed to obtain negative margins.

METHODS

In all, 349 patients with pure or mixed ILC were identified from a database and 318 were successfully matched to 2 controls with IDC on the basis of year of diagnosis, menopausal status, and stage of disease. Conditional logistic regression was used to control for matching.

RESULTS

Patients with ILC were older, had larger tumors (2.6 vs. 2.1 cm; P<.001), and were more likely to have contraindications to BCT (25% vs. 20%). In patients thought to be candidates for BCT, no difference in success rate was noted on the basis of histologic type after controlling for age and stage. In those undergoing BCT, no difference in the number of procedures was seen on the bases of histology after adjustment for age and stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILC are not more likely to fail BCT than those with IDC, nor do they require more operations to obtain negative margins. These results do not support the use of more extensive preoperative evaluation such as magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ILC.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging in men: preliminary results

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate whether the descriptors of lesion features and the diagnostic criteria that have been established for breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in female patients may be used for differential diagnosis with breast MR imaging in male patients as well.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study design was approved by the institutional review board; all patients gave informed consent. The Institutional Review Board and informed consent information applied to the prospective and any retrospective component of the study. Seventeen consecutive male patients (mean age, 53 years +/- 14) were referred for imaging of a palpable breast mass. In addition to mammography and high-frequency breast ultrasonography, patients underwent dynamic breast MR imaging in a prone position with a dedicated double-breast surface coil. The standardized protocol consisted of a T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence followed by a dynamic series. Findings were recorded by using the terminology and descriptors and by evaluating the diagnostic criteria (related to morphology and enhancement kinetics) that have been developed for breast MR imaging in female patients. Validation was achieved at biopsy (nine patients) or follow-up with clinical examination and conventional imaging (eight patients). Because of the small size of the patient cohort, statistical significance was not tested.

RESULTS

A total of 24 breast abnormalities were diagnosed. Three patients had invasive breast cancer (five tumors), 11 had gynecomastia (six unilateral, five bilateral), two had pseudogynecomastia, and one had a benign solid tumor (angiolipoma). All malignant tumors appeared as irregular masses with heterogeneous internal architecture or rim enhancement and showed rapid initial enhancement (mean value, 137% +/- 23) followed by a washout time course (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] category 5). Diffuse and nodular gynecomastia showed slow initial and persistent enhancement with normal-appearing parenchymal architecture (BI-RADS category 2; 15 of 16 breasts in 10 of 11 patients). In one patient with biopsy-proved bilateral gynecomastia, an area with segmental enhancement was classified as suspicious for ductal carcinoma in situ. Pseudogynecomastia did not enhance at all. The angiolipoma showed benign morphologic features and slow initial and persistent enhancement (BI-RADS category 2).

CONCLUSION

In the small study cohort, the MR imaging features of benign breast diseases and breast cancers in male patients seemed to be comparable to those seen in female patients.

Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients

The aim of this study was to identify patients prior to breast-conserving therapy (BCT) who have complementary value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over conventional imaging in the assessment of tumor extent. All patients were eligible for BCT according to conventional imaging, and underwent preoperative MRI as part of this study. One hundred and sixty-five patients (166 tumors) were included. MRI was defined to have complementary value if conventional imaging underestimated or overestimated tumor extent (by more than 10 mm compared to histology) and MRI assessed the extent accurately. Logistic regression was employed to identify characteristics that are predictive of the complementary value of preoperative MRI. MRI had complementary value in 39 cases (23%). Patients <58 years old with irregular lesion margins at mammography and discrepancy in tumor extent by more than 10 mm between mammography and ultrasonography had a 3.2x higher chance of accurate assessment at MRI (positive predictive value 50%, negative predictive value 84%, p=0.0002). Preoperative MRI in patients eligible for BCT is more accurate than conventional imaging in the assessment of tumor extent in approximately one out of four patients. Subgroups of patients in whom MRI has complementary value may be defined by the differences in clinical and imaging features.

[Breast MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma: diagnosis and staging]

PURPOSE

To assess the use of breast MRI for the diagnosis and staging of invasive lobular carcinoma and its impact on surgical management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 35 invasive lobular carcinoma, histologically diagnosed in 34 patients who underwent clinical exam, mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Enhancement at MRI was seen for all 35 cancers. It was focal for 24 patients, regional for 10 and diffuse for 1. The kinetic of the enhancement was characteristic of malignancy for 33 patients. For 11 patients the MRI staging was positive, finding 8 news cancers. For 3 patients MRI lead to biopsy of benign lesions but improved the surgical management in the 8 cases of new cancers: wider excision for 3 cases, planned breast conservation converted to mastectomy in 3 cases and excision of contralateral lesion in 2 cases.

CONCLUSION

Breast MRI is useful in diagnosis, staging and surgical management of invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Computed-tomographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma

We retrospectively analyzed contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) findings in 18 patients with pure invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The features were divided into five types: an ill-defined and inhomogeneous mass with or without regional heterogeneous enhancement, a spiculated inhomogenous mass, a regional heterogeneous enhancement, and a normal finding. The correlation between tumor size on pathological examination was better with size estimation on CE-CT than that on mammography and sonography. CE-CT may provide additional information on the characteristics and extent of this carcinoma.

Dynamic Bilateral Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast: Trade-off between Spatial and Temporal Resolution

PURPOSE

To investigate prospectively the trade-off between temporal and spatial resolution in dynamic contrast material-enhanced bilateral magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Informed consent and institutional review board approval were obtained. An intraindividual comparative study was performed in 30 patients (mean age, 53 years; age range, 27-70 years) with a total of 54 enhancing lesions (28 benign and 26 malignant) who underwent dynamic MR imaging of the breast twice, once with a standard dynamic protocol (256 x 256 matrix, 69 seconds per acquisition) and once on a separate day with a modified dynamic protocol (400 x 512 matrix, 116 seconds per acquisition). Systematic qualitative analysis of morphologic features and region-of-interest-based analysis of enhancement kinetics were performed.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference (generalized linear modeling) in enhancement rates of benign versus malignant lesions was lost when moving from the standard to the modified dynamic protocol. Kinetic information on signal intensity time course patterns was preserved. Delineation of lesion margins and internal architecture was clearly superior with the modified dynamic protocol, which allowed identification of lesion features associated with high positive predictive value or high negative predictive value for breast cancer. Ten benign lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 with the standard protocol were correctly downgraded to BI-RADS category 2 with the modified protocol owing to visualization of internal septations. Thirteen malignant lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 3 or 4 with the standard protocol were correctly upgraded to BI-RADS category 4 or 5 with the modified protocol owing to visualization of spicules or rim enhancement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a significantly larger area under the curve for results obtained with the modified dynamic protocol.

CONCLUSION

Increased spatial resolution significantly improves diagnostic confidence and accuracy at dynamic MR imaging, even if this improvement occurs at the expense of temporal resolution. Loss of kinetic information regarding enhancement rates proved to be not diagnostically relevant because enhancement rates showed broad overlap between benign and malignant lesions and were therefore of only limited diagnostic use in the individual patient. Kinetic information regarding time course pattern was preserved and confirmed as having high specificity and high positive predictive value.

Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular cancer of the breast

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast is increasing. Recent data suggest that lobular carcinoma in situ is an indolent precursor for breast cancer, rather than a pure risk factor. This could imply free surgical margins become important. The risk of contralateral carcinoma and of multifocality of invasive lobular carcinoma is higher than for invasive ductal carcinoma. Therefore, the need for mastectomy, or even for preventative contralateral mastectomy is questioned. Conventional mammography or ultrasonography cannot always give useful preoperative information about the extent of lobular cancers. The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging needs to be established for these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The risk of invasive carcinoma after lobular carcinoma in situ is increased. Invasive carcinoma is usually located at the index point of lobular carcinoma in situ and is of lobular histology. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can be useful in the detection and preoperative staging of invasive lobular carcinoma. The risk of local recurrence is high in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Mastectomy and breast reconstruction could be an option in selected patients. The response to preoperative chemotherapy is worse for invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma, with a greater need for rescue mastectomy.

SUMMARY

Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma are different entities from ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma. Their biological profile should be studied further in order to make the fine tuning of treatment possible.

Further Signs in the Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Mammography

PURPOSE

To increase accuracy and reliability of magnetic resonance breast imaging, a new evaluation method might be helpful. The recently suggested evaluation method (Fischer U, et al) resulted in a relevant number of equivocal cases (3 or 4 points). Additional morphologic and dynamic signs as an extension of this score were evaluated.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

One hundred thirty-two histologically verified lesions were evaluated by 3 radiologists double-blinded using 2 evaluation methods: 1) method 1 (according to Fischer, et al): 2pt: initial signal increase >100%, washout, centripetal enhancement, 1pt: initial signal increase 50-100%, plateau phenomenon, centrifugal inhomogeneous enhancement, irregular borders, linear, stellar or dendritic structure; and 2) method 2 (according to Malich, et al): 3pt: hook sign (sign of pectoral invasion), 2pt: unifocal edema, blooming. 1pt: hypointensity in T2, lymph nodes >10 mm, skin thickening, adjacent vessels, a lesion's distorted inner architecture, disruption of the mamillary edge; -1pt: isointensity in T2, no edema, enhancing septations; -3pt: hyperintensity in T2, non enhancing septations. Method 1 judged a lesion to be malignant if 5 or more points were given and benign if 2 or less points were given, respectively. Method 2 (mean value of 3 radiologists) was tested in those cases in which a clear possible decision using method 1 was not sufficiently possible.

RESULTS

Method 1 alone resulted in a negative predictive value of 96.8% and a positive predictive value of 90.8% (without carcinoma in situ), a sensitivity of 83.1%, a specificity of 58.8%, and revealed uncertain results (3 and 4 points) in 29 cases (out of 132; 22%). Adding the new scoring system in these 29 equivocal cases and an increase of 2 or more points by using method 2 is supposed to be a sign of malignancy; findings suggest a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 60% if an increase of maximum 1 is observed in benign lesions. In conclusion, our results show that Göttingen score alone has a sensitivity of 83.1%, a specificity of 58.8%; the second evaluation method reveals a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 60% in equivocal cases of Göttingen score. Göttingen score then reaches in all cases and second, adding the second evaluation method in equivocal cases, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 76.5%.

CONCLUSION

The application of a second evaluation method in those cases remaining unclear in Göttingen score can lead to a decrease of uncertainty and a higher sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis in MR mammography. In this study, Göttingen score reaches a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 58.8%, increasing to a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 76.5% when being extended by a second evaluation method in unclear cases.

Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ultrasound (US) morphology of invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC) in comparison to that of invasive tumors of other histologic differentiation (TOD). Images of 406 breast lesions were included in this retrospective study. A total of 10 US criteria (shape, orientation, echogenicity, echo pattern, calcifications, margin, margin contour, lesion boundary, surrounding tissue and posterior acoustic features) were defined and determined. Tumors were stratified into ILC (n = 69) vs. TOD (n = 337). The correlation between the sonographically and pathologically measured size of the tumors was analyzed. Irregular shape was found in 88% of ILC vs. 67% of TOD (p < 0.001). Margins were indistinct in 94% of ILC compared to 76% of TOD (p = 0.001). Posterior shadowing was observed in 84% of ILC and 58% of TOD (p = 0.001). Irregular margin contour, hyper- or isoechoic pattern and architectural distortion were more frequent in ILC. Underestimation of tumor size by US was significantly more frequent in ILC (5.4 +/- 12.2 mm) than in TOD (1.4 +/- 12.0 mm) (p = 0.015). In summary, we found that histologic differentiation significantly influences ultrasonographic appearance of breast cancer. The underestimation of tumor size of ILC might compromise the operative strategy.