A3 receptors mediate rapid inflammatory cell influx into the lungs of sensitized guinea-pigs

Adenosine Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Analgesic Targets

Pain represents an international burden and a major socio-economic public health problem. New findings, detailed in this review, suggest that adenosine plays a significant role in neuropathic and inflammatory pain, by acting on its metabotropic adenosine receptors (A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, A3AR). Adenosine receptor ligands have a practical translational potential based on the favorable efficacy and safety profiles that emerged from clinical research on various agonists and antagonists for different pathologies. The present review collects the latest studies on selected adenosine receptor ligands in different pain models. Here, we also covered the many hypothesized pathways and the role of newly synthesized allosteric adenosine receptor modulators. This review aims to present a summary of recent research on adenosine receptors as prospective therapeutic targets for a range of pain-related disorders.

Extracellular cAMP-Adenosine Pathway Signaling: A Potential Therapeutic Target in Chronic Inflammatory Airway Diseases

Adenosine is a purine nucleoside that, via activation of distinct G protein-coupled receptors, modulates inflammation and immune responses. Under pathological conditions and in response to inflammatory stimuli, extracellular ATP is released from damaged cells and is metabolized to extracellular adenosine. However, studies over the past 30 years provide strong evidence for another source of extracellular adenosine, namely the “cAMP-adenosine pathway.” The cAMP-adenosine pathway is a biochemical mechanism mediated by ATP-binding cassette transporters that facilitate cAMP efflux and by specific ectoenzymes that convert cAMP to AMP (ecto-PDEs) and AMP to adenosine (ecto-nucleotidases such as CD73). Importantly, the cAMP-adenosine pathway is operative in many cell types, including those of the airways. In airways, β₂-adrenoceptor agonists, which are used as bronchodilators for treatment of asthma and chronic respiratory diseases, stimulate cAMP efflux and thus trigger the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway leading to increased concentrations of extracellular adenosine in airways. In the airways, extracellular adenosine exerts pro-inflammatory effects and induces bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. These considerations lead to the hypothesis that the cAMP-adenosine pathway attenuates the efficacy of β₂-adrenoceptor agonists. Indeed, our recent findings support this view. In this mini-review, we will highlight the potential role of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway in chronic respiratory inflammatory disorders, and we will explore how extracellular cAMP could interfere with the regulatory effects of intracellular cAMP on airway smooth muscle and innate immune cell function. Finally, we will discuss therapeutic possibilities targeting the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway for treatment of these respiratory diseases.

Focusing on Adenosine Receptors as a Potential Targeted Therapy in Human Diseases

Adenosine is involved in a range of physiological and pathological effects through membrane-bound receptors linked to G proteins. There are four subtypes of adenosine receptors, described as A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR, which are the center of cAMP signal pathway-based drug development. Several types of agonists, partial agonists or antagonists, and allosteric substances have been synthesized from these receptors as new therapeutic drug candidates. Research efforts surrounding A1AR and A2AAR are perhaps the most enticing because of their concentration and affinity; however, as a consequence of distressing conditions, both A2BAR and A3AR levels might accumulate. This review focuses on the biological features of each adenosine receptor as the basis of ligand production and describes clinical studies of adenosine receptor-associated pharmaceuticals in human diseases.

Evaluation of SSR161421, a novel orally active adenosine A3 receptor antagonist on pharmacology models

The effects of a novel adenosine A(3) receptor antagonist, SSR161421, were examined on both antigen per se and adenosine receptor agonist-increased airway responses in antigen-sensitized guinea pigs. Adenosine (10(-5)M) and AB-MECA [N6-(4-aminobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyl-uronamide dihydrochloride] (10(-7)M) increased the antigen response up to 61 ± 3.0% and 88 ± 5.2% of maximal contraction, respectively. The agonists of adenosine A(1) and A(2) adenosine receptors NECA [1-(6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)-1-deoxy-N-ethyl-b-d-ribofuranuronamide-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine], R-PIA [N(6)-R-phenylisopropyladenosine], and CGS21680 (10(-7)M) were ineffective. In vivo intravenous adenosine (600 μg/kg) and AB-MECA (30 μg/kg) increased the threshold antigen dose-induced bronchoconstriction by 214 ± 13.0% and 220 ± 15.2%, respectively. SSR161421 in vitro (IC(50)=5.9 × 10(-7)M) inhibited the AB-MECA-enhanced antigen-induced airway smooth muscle contractions and also in vivo the bronchoconstriction following either intravenous (ED(50)=0.008 mg/kg) or oral (ED(50)=0.03 mg/kg) administration in sensitized guinea pigs. Antigen itself could evoke tracheal contraction in vitro and bronchoconstriction in vivo in antigen-sensitized guinea pigs. SSR161421 (3 × 10(-6)M) decreased the AUC of the antigen-induced contraction-time curve to 20.8 ± 5.4% from the 100% control level. SSR161421 effectively reversed the antigen-induced bronchoconstriction, plasma leak and cell recruitment with EC(50) values of 0.33 mg/kg p.o., 0.02 mg/kg i.p. and 3 mg/kg i.p., respectively.

Impact of disrupting adenosine A₃ receptors (A₃⁻/⁻ AR) on colonic motility or progression of colitis in the mouse

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological studies suggest that adenosine A₃AR influences motility and colitis. Functional A₃⁻/⁻AR knockout mice were used to prove whether A₃AR activation is involved in modulating either motility or colitis.

METHODS

A₃AR was probed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping, Western blot, and immunochemistry. Motility was assessed in vivo by artificial bead-expulsion, stool-frequency, and FITC-dextran transit. Colitis was induced with dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) in A₃⁻/⁻AR or wildtype (WT) age- and sex-matched controls. Progression of colitis was evaluated by histopathology, changes in myeloperoxidase (MPO), colon length, CD4(+) -cells, weight-loss, diarrhea, and the guaiac test.

RESULTS

Goat anti-hu-A₃ antiserum identified a 66 kDa immunogenic band in colon. A₃AR-immunoreactivity is expressed in SYN(+) -nerve varicosities, s-100(+) -glia, and crypt cells, but not 5-HT(+) (EC), CD4(+) (T), tryptase(+) (MC), or muscle cells. A₃AR immunoreactivity in myenteric ganglia of distal colon >> proximal colon by a ratio of 2:1. Intestinal transit and bead expulsion were accelerated in A₃⁻/⁻AR mice compared to WT; stool retention was lower by 40%-60% and stool frequency by 67%. DSS downregulated A₃AR in epithelia. DSS histopathology scores indicated less mucosal damage in AA₃⁻/⁻AR mice than WT. A₃⁻/⁻AR phenotype protected against DSS-induced weight loss, neutrophil (MPO), or CD4(+) -T cell infiltration, colon shortening, change in splenic weight, diarrhea, or occult-fecal blood.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional disruption of A₃AR in A₃⁻/⁻AR mice alters intestinal motility. We postulate that ongoing release of adenosine and activation of presynaptic-inhibitory A₃AR can slow down transit and inhibit the defecation reflex. A₃AR may be involved in gliotransmission. In separate studies, A₃⁻/⁻AR protects against DSS colitis, consistent with a novel hypothesis that A₃AR activation contributes to development of colitis.

A3 adenosine receptor: pharmacology and role in disease

The study of the A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) represents a rapidly growing and intense area of research in the adenosine field. The present chapter will provide an overview of the expression patterns, molecular pharmacology and functional role of this A(3)AR subtype under pathophysiological conditions. Through studies utilizing selective A(3)AR agonists and antagonists, or A(3)AR knockout mice, it is now clear that this receptor plays a critical role in the modulation of ischemic diseases as well as in inflammatory and autoimmune pathologies. Therefore, the potential therapeutic use of agonists and antagonists will also be described. The discussion will principally address the use of such compounds in the treatment of brain and heart ischemia, asthma, sepsis and glaucoma. The final part concentrates on the molecular basis of A(3)ARs in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, and includes a description of clinical trials with the selective agonist CF101. Based on this chapter, it is evident that continued research to discover agonists and antagonists for the A(3)AR subtype is warranted.

Adenosine signaling and the regulation of chronic lung disease

Chronic lung diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease are characterized by inflammation and tissue remodeling processes that compromise pulmonary function. Adenosine is produced in the inflamed and damaged lung where it plays numerous roles in the regulation of inflammation and tissue remodeling. Extracellular adenosine serves as an autocrine and paracrine signaling molecule by engaging cell surface adenosine receptors. Preclinical and cellular studies suggest that adenosine plays an anti-inflammatory role in processes associated with acute lung disease, where activation of the A(2A)R and A(2B)R has promising implications for the treatment of these disorders. In contrast, there is growing evidence that adenosine signaling through the A(1)R, A(2B)R and A(3)R may serve pro-inflammatory and tissue remodeling functions in chronic lung diseases. This review discusses the current progress of research efforts and clinical trials aimed at understanding the complexities of these signaling pathway as they pertain to the development of treatment strategies for chronic lung diseases.

Adenosine receptors and inflammation

Extracellular adenosine is produced in a coordinated manner from cells following cellular challenge or tissue injury. Once produced, it serves as an autocrine- and paracrine-signaling molecule through its interactions with seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors. These signaling pathways have widespread physiological and pathophysiological functions. Immune cells express adenosine receptors and respond to adenosine or adenosine agonists in diverse manners. Extensive in vitro and in vivo studies have identified potent anti-inflammatory functions for all of the adenosine receptors on many different inflammatory cells and in various inflammatory disease processes. In addition, specific proinflammatory functions have also been ascribed to adenosine receptor activation. The potent effects of adenosine signaling on the regulation of inflammation suggest that targeting specific adenosine receptor activation or inactivation using selective agonists and antagonists could have important therapeutic implications in numerous diseases. This review is designed to summarize the current status of adenosine receptor signaling in various inflammatory cells and in models of inflammation, with an emphasis on the advancement of adenosine-based therapeutics to treat inflammatory disorders.

Adenosine receptors and asthma

The pathophysiological processes underlying respiratory diseases like asthma are complex, resulting in an overwhelming choice of potential targets for the novel treatment of this disease. Despite this complexity, asthmatic subjects are uniquely sensitive to a range of substances like adenosine, thought to act indirectly to evoke changes in respiratory mechanics and in the underlying pathology, and thereby to offer novel insights into the pathophysiology of this disease. Adenosine is of particular interest because this substance is produced endogenously by many cells during hypoxia, stress, allergic stimulation, and exercise. Extracellular adenosine can be measured in significant concentrations within the airways; can be shown to activate adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes on lung resident cells and migrating inflammatory cells, thereby altering their function, and could therefore play a significant role in this disease. Many preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have documented the roles of the various AR subtypes in regulating cell function and how they might have a beneficial impact in disease models. Agonists and antagonists of some of these receptor subtypes have been developed and have progressed to clinical studies in order to evaluate their potential as novel antiasthma drugs. In this chapter, we will highlight the roles of adenosine and AR subtypes in many of the characteristic features of asthma: airway obstruction, inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and remodeling. We will also discuss the merit of targeting each receptor subtype in the development of novel antiasthma drugs.

Intranasal administration of NECA can induce both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory effects in BALB/c mice: evidence for A 2A receptor sub-type mediation of NECA-induced anti-inflammatory effects

The role of adenosine in allergic inflammation is unclear. This study investigated the effects of the non-selective adenosine receptor agonist, 5-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), on immunized only and immunized and airway challenged mice. The adenosine receptor sub-type(s) mediating the NECA effects and the A(2A) receptor mRNA expression were also investigated. In mice that were only immunized, intranasal NECA (1 mM) administration caused a significant increase in bronchoalveolar lavage total cell count (TCC), neutrophils and eosinophils (>1.5-, >6 and >60-fold, respectively). Two and four intranasal ovalbumin (OVA) challenges induced a significant (P < 0.05) increase in TCC (>2.1- and >4-fold, respectively) and eosinophils (>350- and >1700-fold, respectively). Real-time PCR analysis showed that the A(2A) receptor sub-type mRNA was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the lung tissue of immunized mice following both two and four OVA challenges. NECA (0.3 mM) treatment caused a significant reduction in the increase induced by the two and four OVA challenges in the TCC by 46.1% and 56.6%, respectively, eosinophils by 70.1% and 75.6%, respectively, and in the A(2A) receptor sub-type mRNA by 43.2% and 41.0%, respectively. Treatment with the A(2A) receptor antagonist, 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine), SCH-58261, completely reversed both the NECA-mediated reduction in TCC and eosinophilia. Moreover, OVA challenge of immunized mice, over 2 consecutive days, resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) increase in TCC (4.5-fold) and eosinophils (>2000-fold) that was detected 72 h later. NECA (0.3 mM) treatment, at 24 and 48 h post OVA challenge, significantly reduced the increase in both TCC and eosinophils by 45.0% and 74.8%, respectively. Our data show that in immunized, but not OVA-challenged mice, high dose of NECA (1 mM) induces an inflammatory airway response. In contrast, in models of inflammation, NECA, at mainly 0.3 mM, induces a significant anti-inflammatory effect when administered prior to the induction of airway inflammation or therapeutically following its establishment. The data also indicate that the anti-inflammatory action of NECA seems to be mediated via the A(2A) receptor sub-type and hence the use of selective A(2A) receptor agonists as potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as asthma should be investigated further.

Adenosine receptors and asthma in humans

According to an executive summary of the GINA dissemination committee report, it is now estimated that approximately 300 million people (5% of the global population or 1 in 20 persons) have asthma. Despite the scientific progress made over the past several decades toward improving our understanding of the pathophysiology of asthma, there is still a great need for improved therapies, particularly oral therapies that enhance patient compliance and that target new mechanisms of action. Adenosine is an important signalling molecule in human asthma. By acting on extracellular G-protein-coupled ARs on a number of different cell types important in the pathophysiology of human asthma, adenosine affects bronchial reactivity, inflammation and airway remodelling. Four AR subtypes (A(1), A(2a), A(2b) and A(3)) have been cloned in humans, are expressed in the lung, and are all targets for drug development for human asthma. This review summarizes what is known about these AR subtypes and their function in human asthma as well as the pros and cons of therapeutic approaches to these AR targets. A number of molecules with high affinity and high selectivity for the human AR subtypes have entered clinical trials or are poised to enter clinical trials as anti-asthma treatments. With the availability of these molecules for testing in humans, the function of ARs in human asthma, as well as the safety and efficacy of approaches to the different AR targets, can now be determined.

Adenosine A3 receptor deficiency exerts unanticipated protective effects on the pressure-overloaded left ventricle

BACKGROUND

Endogenous adenosine can protect the overloaded heart against the development of hypertrophy and heart failure, but the contribution of A(1) receptors (A(1)R) and A(3) receptors (A(3)R) is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To test the hypothesis that A(1)R and A(3)R can protect the heart against systolic overload, we exposed A(3)R gene-deficient (A(3)R knockout [KO]) mice and A(1)R KO mice to transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Contrary to our hypothesis, A(3)R KO attenuated 5-week TAC-induced left ventricular hypertrophy (ratio of ventricular mass/body weight increased to 7.6+/-0.3 mg/g in wild-type mice compared with 6.3+/-0.4 mg/g in KO mice), fibrosis, and dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to 43+/-2.5% and 55+/-4.2% in wild-type and KO mice, respectively). A(3)R KO also attenuated the TAC-induced increases of myocardial atrial natriuretic peptide and the oxidative stress markers 3'-nitrotyrosine and 4-hydroxynonenal. In contrast, A(1)R KO increased TAC-induced mortality but did not alter ventricular hypertrophy or dysfunction compared with wild-type mice. In mice in which extracellular adenosine production was impaired by CD73 KO, TAC caused greater hypertrophy and dysfunction and increased myocardial 3'-nitrotyrosine. In neonatal rat cardiomyocytes induced to hypertrophy with phenylephrine, the adenosine analogue 2-chloroadenosine reduced cell area, protein synthesis, atrial natriuretic peptide, and 3'-nitrotyrosine. Antagonism of A(3)R significantly potentiated the antihypertrophic effects of 2-chloroadenosine.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine exerts protective effects on the overloaded heart, but the A(3)R acts counter to the protective effect of adenosine. The data suggest that selective attenuation of A(3)R activity might be a novel approach to treat pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction.

Regulation of enteric functions by adenosine: pathophysiological and pharmacological implications

The wide distribution of ATP and adenosine receptors as well as enzymes for purine metabolism in different gut regions suggests a complex role for these mediators in the regulation of gastrointestinal functions. Studies in rodents have shown a significant involvement of adenosine in the control of intestinal secretion, motility and sensation, via activation of A1, A2A, A2B or A3 purinergic receptors, as well as the participation of ATP in the regulation of enteric functions, through the recruitment of P2X and P2Y receptors. Increasing interest is being focused on the involvement of ATP and adenosine in the pathophysiology of intestinal disorders, with particular regard for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), intestinal ischemia, post-operative ileus and related dysfunctions, such as gut dysmotility, diarrhoea and abdominal discomfort/pain. Current knowledge suggests that adenosine contributes to the modulation of enteric immune and inflammatory responses, leading to anti-inflammatory actions. There is evidence supporting a role of adenosine in the alterations of enteric motor and secretory activity associated with bowel inflammation. In particular, several studies have highlighted the importance of adenosine in diarrhoea, since this nucleoside participates actively in the cross-talk between immune and epithelial cells in the presence of diarrhoeogenic stimuli. In addition, adenosine exerts complex regulatory actions on pain transmission at peripheral and spinal sites. The present review illustrates current information on the role played by adenosine in the regulation of enteric functions, under normal or pathological conditions, and discusses pharmacological interventions on adenosine pathways as novel therapeutic options for the management of gut disorders and related abdominal symptoms.

Adenosine receptors and asthma

The accumulation of evidence implicating a role for adenosine in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to investigations into all adenosine receptor subtypes as potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of asthma. Selective A(1) receptor antagonists are currently in preclinical development since adenosine has been shown experimentally to mediate various features of asthma through this receptor such as bronchoconstriction, mucus secretion and inflammation. The A(2A) receptor is expressed on most inflammatory cells implicated in asthma, and as A(2A) stimulation activates adenylate cyclase and consequently elevates cAMP, selective A(2A) receptor agonists have now reached clinical development. However, initial reports concerning their efficacy are inconclusive. A(2B) receptor antagonists are also under investigation based on the rationale that inhibiting the effects of adenosine on mast cells would be beneficial, in addition to other reported pro-inflammatory effects mediated by the A(2B) receptor on cells such as airway smooth muscle, epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Whilst the effects in pre-clinical models are promising, their efficacy in the clinical setting has also yet to be reported. Finally, adenosine A(3) receptor stimulation has been demonstrated to mediate inhibitory effects on eosinophils since it also elevates cAMP. However, some experimental reports suggest that A(3) antagonists mediate anti-inflammatory effects, thus the rationale for A(3) receptor ligands as therapeutic agents remains to be determined. In conclusion, establishing the precise role of adenosine in the pathogenesis of asthma and developing appropriate subtype selective agonists/antagonists represents an exciting opportunity for the development of novel therapeutics for the treatment of asthma.

The A3 adenosine receptor: an enigmatic player in cell biology

Adenosine is a primordial signaling molecule present in every cell of the human body that mediates its physiological functions by interacting with 4 subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors, termed A1, A2A, A2B and A3. The A3 subtype is perhaps the most enigmatic among adenosine receptors since, although several studies have been performed in the years to elucidate its physiological function, it still presents in several cases a double nature in different pathophysiological conditions. The 2 personalities of A3 often come into direct conflict, e.g., in ischemia, inflammation and cancer, rendering this receptor as a single entity behaving in 2 different ways. This review focuses on the most relevant aspects of A3 adenosine subtype activation and summarizes the pharmacological evidence as the basis of the dichotomy of this receptor in different therapeutic fields. Although much is still to be learned about the function of the A3 receptor and in spite of its duality, at the present time it can be speculated that A3 receptor selective ligands might show utility in the treatment of ischemic conditions, glaucoma, asthma, arthritis, cancer and other disorders in which inflammation is a feature. The biggest and most intriguing challenge for the future is therefore to understand whether and where selective A3 agonists or antagonists are the best choice.

In vivo adenosine A(2B) receptor desensitization in guinea-pig airway smooth muscle: implications for asthma

This study was aimed at characterizing the role of adenosine receptor subtypes in the contractility modulation of guinea-pig airway smooth muscle in normal and pathological settings. In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed by testing selective agonists and antagonists on isolated tracheal smooth muscle preparations and pulmonary inflation pressure, respectively, under normal conditions or following ovalbumin-induced allergic sensitization. In normal and sensitized animals, the adenosine A(2A)/A(2B) receptor agonist, NECA, evoked relaxing responses of isolated tracheal preparations precontracted with histamine, and such an effect was reversed by the adenosine A(2B) antagonist, MRS 1706, in the presence or in the absence of epithelium. The expression of mRNA coding for adenosine A(2B) receptors was demonstrated in tracheal specimens. In vitro desensitization with 100 microM NECA markedly reduced the relaxing effect of the agonist. In vivo NECA or adenosine administration to normal animals inhibited histamine-mediated bronchoconstriction, while these inhibitory effects no longer occurred in sensitized guinea-pigs. Adenosine plasma levels were significantly higher in sensitized than normal animals. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that: (i) adenosine A(2B) receptors are responsible for the relaxing effects of adenosine on guinea-pig airways; (ii) these receptors can undergo rapid adaptive changes that may affect airway smooth muscle responsiveness to adenosine; (iii) ovalbumin-induced sensitization promotes a reversible inactivation of adenosine A(2B) receptors which can be ascribed to homologous desensitization. These findings can be relevant to better understand adenosine functions in airways as well as mechanisms of action of asthma therapies targeting the adenosine system.

Role of adenosine receptors in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: recent developments

Adenosine is a naturally occurring purine nucleoside with a ubiquitous presence in human tissue, where it plays a key role in many biological processes such as energy generation and protein metabolism. It has been shown that adenosine induces bronchoconstriction in asthmatic and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but not in normal airways. Four different G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors have been described, namely adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) receptors. The main mechanism of adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction appears to involve the release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells via activation of the A(2B) receptor. However, adenosine can also act on A(1), A(2A) and A(3) receptors. In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the role of adenosine receptors in asthma and COPD, since it is now clear that they play an important role in the pathophysiology of asthma and COPD. Adenosine receptors are involved in the production and release of a variety of mediators from inflammatory and structural cells. A therapeutic potential for adenosine receptor modulation has even been anticipated. This review focuses on the role of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Mechanism of adenosine-induced airways obstruction in allergic guinea pigs

Inhaled adenosine induces airway obstruction in asthmatic but not healthy subjects, a phenomenon that is also observed in various animal species when they are immunised to a relevant antigen, but which does not occur in naïve animals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of airway responsiveness to adenosine receptor agonists in anaesthetised allergic guinea pigs. Inhaled adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), the A1-selective adenosine receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and ovalbumin all caused airway obstruction in allergic guinea pigs, but not naïve animals, as assessed by changes in total lung resistance. In contrast, the A(2a)-selective (CGS 21680; 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxoamido adenosine) and A3-selective (IB-MECA; 1-deoxy-1-[6-[[3-iodophenyl)-methyl]amino]-9H-purin-9-yl]-N-methyl-beta-D-ribofuranuronamide) adenosine receptor agonists failed to elicit airway obstruction in passively sensitised guinea pigs. Airway obstruction induced by AMP or CPA was not inhibited by the H1 receptor antagonist, mepyramine (1 mg kg(-1)) in passively sensitised guinea-pigs. In contrast, airway obstruction to ovalbumin was significantly inhibited by this antagonist. Airway obstruction induced by AMP and CPA was significantly inhibited in sensitised animals chronically treated with capsaicin. In contrast, airway obstruction to ovalbumin was not inhibited by this treatment. Airway obstruction induced by AMP, CPA and ovalbumin was significantly inhibited following bilateral vagotomy or pharmacological treatment with atropine (2 mg kg(-1)). Airway obstruction to CPA was inhibited by the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX: 0.1-1 mg kg(-1)). In contrast, airway obstruction to ovalbumin was not inhibited by this treatment. These observations provide evidence indicating that AMP and CPA may induce airway obstruction in sensitised guinea pigs by a mechanism unrelated to histamine release from mast cells, but is mediated via an adenosine A1-receptor-dependent mechanism. The inhibition of AMP- and CPA-induced airway obstruction by atropine, capsaicin and bilateral vagotomy suggests a neuronal-dependent mechanism with the particular involvement of capsaicin-sensitive nerves.

The Effect of A2A Adenosine Receptor Agonist on Composite Tissue Allotransplant Survival: An In Vivo Preliminary Study

BACKGROUND

In vitro experimental studies showed that A2a receptor agonists reduce allostimulatory functions of the dendritic cells through modulation of surface expression of the costimulatory molecules and down-regulation of cytokines. Similar suppressive effects on dendritic cells have also been observed with Cyclosporine A (CsA). In this study we sought to explore if combined use of these two drugs in vivo could prolong the survival of composite tissue allografts across MHC barriers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 hindlimb transplantations were performed across a major MHC barrier from Brown Norway rats (BN; RT1n) to Lewis rats (Lew; RT1l) In the control group, either isografts (group 1, n = 2) or allografts (group 2, n = 3) were performed and no treatment was given. In the experimental group three kinds of treatment protocols were used: (1) A2a adenosine receptor agonist alone (group 3, n = 6); (2) CsA alone (group 4, n = 7); and (3) A2a adenosine receptor agonist + CsA combined treatment (group 5, n = 6). Mean survival times of each group as well as cytokine levels including IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, INF-gamma, and TNF-alpha were analyzed by ELISA.

RESULTS

Isografts survived indefinitely. The mean survival times for allograft groups (group 2 to 5) were 9.8 +/- 1.3, 10.5 +/- 1.0, 29.8 +/- 1.7, and 22 +/- 1.4 days, respectively. Statistically, there was no difference between the allograft control group and the A2a adenosine receptor agonist treated group (P = 0.35). However, survival of the allografts in the CsA-treated group was significantly higher than the A2a adenosine receptor agonist treated (P < 00001) and combined CsA + A2a adenosine receptor agonist treated group (P < 0.0001). In vivo A2a adenosine receptor agonist treatment alone increased the levels of IL-2, INF-gamma, and TNF-alpha, which are important cytokines for induction of allotransplant rejection. However A2a adenosine receptor agonist in combination with CsA significantly reduced the levels of suppressor cytokines IL-4 and IL-10.

CONCLUSION

As opposed to the previous in vitro studies, the results from this in vivo study showed that A2a adenosine receptor agonist treatment does not prolong composite tissue allograft survival. Compared to CsA treatment alone, the allotransplant survival was even shorter with the combined treatment. Treatment with A2a adenosine receptor agonist possibly promotes the differentiation of alloreactive CD4 cells predominantly into T-helper 1 phenotype. As a result, the levels of stimulatory cytokines contributing to allograft rejection are increased and suppressor cytokines are reduced, leading to accelerated allograft rejection.

Role of adenosine in airway inflammation in an allergic mouse model of asthma

In the present study, we examined dynamic changes in cellular profile of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid after adenosine challenge in ragweed sensitized and challenged mice. Mice systemically sensitized and airway challenged with ragweed showed marked airway inflammation manifesting increased eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils and activated macrophages in BAL. Adenosine challenge further enhanced influx of inflammatory cells into BAL, notably neutrophils from 1 to 72 h and eosinophils from 1 to 48 h time-points (p<0.05), which sharply rose at 6-h time-point following adenosine challenge. Greater infiltration of lymphocytes into BAL was observed at 1 and 72 h and macrophages from 6 to 72 h (p<0.05) after adenosine challenge. Accordingly, markers of eosinophils, neutrophils and mast cells were analyzed at 6-h time-point after adenosine challenge. Adenosine challenge significantly increased the levels of eosinophil peroxidase, neutrophil myeloperoxidase and beta-hexosaminidase in BAL. There were more significant effects of adenosine challenge on the degranulation of mast cells in the lung than that in blood. The chemoattractant, eotaxin, was detected in BAL, which increased after adenosine challenge. Theophylline, a non-specific adenosine receptor antagonist, prevented adenosine-enhanced infiltration of inflammatory cells and their respective markers. Our findings suggest that adenosine plays an important role in airway inflammation in an allergic mouse model.

Early- and late-phase bronchoconstriction, airway hyper-reactivity and cell influx into the lungs, after 5'-adenosine monophosphate inhalation: comparison with ovalbumin

BACKGROUND

Antigen inhalation in atopic asthmatic patients results in an early asthmatic response (EAR), accompanied by a late asthmatic response (LAR) in 60% of patients. Inhaled 5'-adenosine monophosphate (5'-AMP) causes immediate bronchoconstriction in asthmatics but not in normal subjects.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate whether 5'-AMP can produce a LAR, airway hyper-reactivity (AHR) and cell influx to the lungs, in a sensitized guinea-pig model of asthma, and to compare with the profile of activity after ovalbumin (OVA) inhalation.

METHODS

Airway responses to inhaled OVA (10 microg/mL) and 5'-AMP (3 and 300 mm) of actively sensitized, conscious guinea-pigs were determined by whole body plethysmography as the change in specific airway conductance (sGaw). Inhaled histamine (1 mm) was used to investigate AHR, and cell influx was determined by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).

RESULTS

Exposure to OVA revealed an EAR, and LAR at 6 h post-challenge. AHR to histamine occurred 24 h after challenge together with a significant increase in total and differential (eosinophils and macrophages) cell counts. Low dose 5'-AMP (3 mm) produced an EAR, LAR at 6 h after challenge, and AHR to histamine 12 h post-challenge. No AHR occurred 24 h after inhalation. Total and macrophage cell counts were increased significantly 6, 12 and 24 h after exposure. Bronchodilatation followed high dose 5'-AMP (300 mm), followed by a LAR at 6 h. AHR to histamine occurred 12 h after challenge, but not at 24 h. A significant increase in total and differential (eosinophils and macrophages) cell counts occurred 6, 12 and 24 h post-exposure. No changes were observed in non-sensitized guinea-pigs.

CONCLUSION

OVA challenge revealed an EAR, LAR, cell influx and AHR in a guinea-pig model of asthma. This study demonstrated for the first time that a LAR and AHR to histamine can be revealed following 5'-AMP inhalation, in sensitized but not unsensitized guinea-pigs. Cell influx at 6, 12 and 24 h post-challenge suggests that it may be associated with the LAR and AHR.

Involvement of mast cells in adenosine-mediated bronchoconstriction and inflammation in an allergic mouse model

In allergen-induced asthma, activation of lung mast cells leads to bronchial constriction, increased mucus secretion, and an increase in the localization of inflammatory cells to the airways. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of mast cells in adenosine-mediated airway reactivity and inflammation using the mast cell degranulating agent, compound 48/80 (C48/80). Mice were sensitized and challenged with ragweed (or 0.9% saline) followed by C48/80 administration twice a day in increasing doses for 5 days. Dose-responsiveness to the nonspecific adenosine receptor agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) was established, and lung lavage was performed 24 h later for cell differential analysis to evaluate inflammation. At a dose of 375 microg/ml (aerosolized NECA), C48/80 pretreatment resulted in a significant attenuation in airway reactivity when compared with sensitized control mice (330.07 versus 581.57%, respectively). Lung lavage from the C48/80 treated mice showed a decrease in eosinophils (17.7 versus 60.9%, respectively) and an increase in macrophages when compared with the sensitized control group (76.4 versus 30.8%, respectively). These results support the conclusion that mast cell degranulation plays an important role in adenosine receptor-mediated airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation.

Role of adenosine receptors in regulating chemotaxis and cytokine production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) are potent regulators of immune function and the major source of type I interferon (IFN) following viral infection. PDCs are found at sites of inflammation in allergic reactions, autoimmune disorders, and cancer, but the mechanisms leading to the recruitment of PDCs to these sites remain elusive. During inflammation, adenosine is released and functions as a signaling molecule via adenosine receptors. This study analyzes adenosine receptor expression and function in human PDCs. Adenosine was found to be a potent chemotactic stimulus for immature PDCs via an A(1) receptor-mediated mechanism. The migratory response toward adenosine was comparable to that seen with CXCL12 (stromal-derived factor-1 alpha [SDF-1 alpha), the most potent chemotactic stimulus identified thus far for immature PDCs. Upon maturation, PDCs down-regulate the A(1) receptor, resulting in a loss of migratory function. In contrast, mature PDCs up-regulate the A(2a) receptor, which is positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase and has been implicated in the down-regulation of DC cytokine-producing capacity. We show that in mature PDCs adenosine reduces interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12, and IFN-alpha production in response to CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN). These findings indicate that adenosine may play a dual role in PDC-mediated immunity by initially recruiting immature PDCs to sites of inflammation and by subsequently limiting the extent of the inflammatory response induced by mature PDCs by inhibiting their cytokine-producing capacity.

Identification of A3 receptor- and mast cell-dependent and -independent components of adenosine-mediated airway responsiveness in mice

Adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction is a well-recognized feature of atopic asthma. Adenosine acts through four different G protein-coupled receptors to produce a myriad of physiological effects. To examine the contribution of the A(3) adenosine receptor to adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction and to assess the contribution of mast cells to this process, we quantified airway responsiveness to aerosolized adenosine in wild-type, A(3) receptor-deficient, and mast cell-deficient mice. Compared with the robust airway responses elicited by adenosine in wild-type mice, both A(3)-deficient and mast cell-deficient mice exhibited a significantly attenuated response compared with their respective wild-type controls. Histological examination of the airways 4 h after adenosine exposure revealed extensive degranulation of airway mast cells as well as infiltration of neutrophils in wild-type mice, whereas these findings were much diminished in A(3)-deficient mice and were not different from those in PBS-treated controls. These data indicate that the airway responses to aerosolized adenosine in mice occur largely through A(3) receptor activation and that mast cells contribute significantly to these responses, but that activation of additional adenosine receptors on a cell type(s) other than mast cells also contributes to adenosine-induced airway responsiveness in mice. Finally, our findings indicate that adenosine exposure can result in A(3)-dependent airway inflammation, as reflected in neutrophil recruitment, as well as alterations in airway function.

Contractile responses to adenosine, R-PIA and ovalbumen in passively sensitized guinea-pig isolated airways

1. Responses to adenosine, R-PIA and ovalbumen were examined in guinea-pig isolated superfused tracheal spirals to determine the effects of passive sensitization by overnight incubation in serum from ovalbumen (OA)-sensitized or non-sensitized guinea-pigs. 2. Tissues incubated with serum from non-sensitized and OA-sensitized guinea-pigs contracted (0.07+/-0.02 and 0.04+/-0.01 g, respectively) to adenosine (300 micro M) whereas non-incubated or Krebs-incubated tissues produced no contractions to adenosine or ovalbumen (10 micro g). Ovalbumen caused substantial contractions (0.40+/-0.09 g) after OA-sensitized serum incubation and significantly (P<0.05) smaller contractions (0.08+/-0.03 g) after non-sensitized serum incubation. Tracheae from guinea-pigs actively sensitized to ovalbumen 14-21 days beforehand also contracted to adenosine, R-PIA (3 micro M) and ovalbumen. 3. The A(1)/A(2) adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT, 3 micro M), failed to antagonize these contractions, suggesting that A(1)/A(2) adenosine receptors were not involved. 4. Unlike adenosine, R-PIA (3 micro M) produced contractions in non-incubated (0.23+/-0.04 g) or Krebs-incubated (0.15+/-0.04 g) tracheae, as well as after passive and active sensitization. None of these responses were blocked by 8-PT. 5. The A(3) receptor agonist, IB-MECA, in the presence of 8-PT produced small contractions in passively sensitized tracheae (10 micro M, 0.02+/-0.003 g) and, in larger doses (100 micro M and 1 mM), contracted actively sensitized tracheae. 6. In actively sensitized trachea, the A(3) receptor antagonist, MRS-1220 (100 nM), significantly (P<0.05) attenuated adenosine contractions in the presence of 8-PT from 0.23+/-0.07 g to 0.07+/-0.03 g. 7. These results show that passive, like active sensitization, reveals bronchoconstrictions to adenosine of isolated tracheae. The insensitivity to 8-PT blockade, the antagonism by MRS-1220, and the fact that the A(3) receptor agonist, IB-MECA, mimics this response, suggest involvement of A(3) receptors. R-PIA, however, has a different profile of adenosine receptor activity.

Mediators of adenosine- and ovalbumen-induced bronchoconstriction of sensitized guinea-pig isolated airways

The mediators of bronchoconstriction of isolated lungs and trachea from ovalbumen sensitized guinea-pigs to adenosine and ovalbumen were examined using relevant antagonists. Changes in perfusion pressure and tension of paired lung halves and tracheal spiral strips, respectively, were recorded in response to adenosine (1 mM lung, 300 microM trachea), histamine (10 microM), methacholine (10 microM) and ovalbumen (10 microg). One half was perfused with antagonist while the other received vehicle. Tracheal strips were superfused throughout with the P(1) receptor antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline, to examine 8-phenyltheophylline-resistant responses. The histamine H(1) receptor antagonist, mepyramine (1.5 mM), the cyclooxygenase inhibitors, indomethacin (5 mM) and diclofenac (5 mM), the leukotriene receptor antagonist, zafirlukast (1 mM), and the lipoxygenase inhibitor, zileuton (20 mM), alone failed to inhibit bronchoconstriction by adenosine and ovalbumen of the lung and trachea. When two antagonists were combined, only mepyramine and zafirlukast significantly reduced the lung responses to adenosine and ovalbumen. The tracheal adenosine response was substantially reduced, although not significantly, while ovalbumen was significantly reduced. When mepyramine, indomethacin and zafirlukast were combined, the lung constriction by adenosine and ovalbumen were virtually abolished. Similarly, the combination of mepyramine, diclofenac and zafirlukast significantly attenuated the lung responses to adenosine and ovalbumen. Thus, histamine, cyclooxygenase products and leukotrienes alone are not responsible for the bronchoconstriction of isolated sensitized lung tissues to adenosine or ovalbumen, which appears to be due to the release of all three mediators.

Adenosine-mediated bronchoconstriction and lung inflammation in an allergic mouse model

In this study, we studied the role of adenosine on airway responsiveness and airway inflammation using an allergic mouse model. Mice were sensitized by two i.p. injections of ragweed and three consecutive ragweed aerosol challenges. It was found that inhalation of adenosine causes a dose-related bronchoconstriction in this model. Ragweed sensitized and challenged mice showed increased sensitivity to airway challenge to adenosine compared to control animals. Theophylline, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, blocked adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction, but was unable to inhibit bronchoconstrictor response to methacholine. Mice systemically sensitized and airway challenged with allergen showed a marked airway inflammation manifesting increases in eosinophils, lymphocytes and neutrophils, and decrease in macrophages. Twenty-four hours after airway challenge with allergen, aerosolization of adenosine further potentiated the allergen-induced airway inflammation. Cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after adenosine aerosolization increased by 3.07-fold as compared to control mice, and by 1.8-fold compared to ragweed sensitized and challenged mice. The increases in eosinophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophils caused by allergen were potentiated after adenosine challenge. Unexpectedly, macrophages significantly decreased after adenosine challenge. Theophylline attenuated adenosine-enhanced airway inflammation, but could not reverse allergen-induced airway inflammation. These findings suggested that specific adenosine receptors contribute to airway responsiveness and airway inflammation associated with this model of allergic asthma.

Adenosine A(3) receptor-mediated potentiation of mucociliary transport and epithelial ciliary motility

To examine the effect of adenosine A(3) receptor stimulation on airway mucociliary clearance, we measured transport of Evans blue dye in rabbit trachea in vivo and ciliary motility of epithelium by the photoelectric method in vitro. Mucociliary transport was enhanced dose dependently by the selective A(3) agonist N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarbamoyladenosine (IB-MECA) and to a lesser extent by the less-selective N(6)-2-(4-amino-3-iodophenyl)ethyladenosine, whereas the A(1) agonist N-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and the A(2) agonist CGS-21680 had no effect. The effect of IB-MECA was abolished by pretreatment with the selective A(3) antagonist MRS-1220 but not by the A(1) antagonist 1,3-dipropyly-8-cyclopentylxanthine or the A(2) antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-L-propargylxanthine. Epithelial ciliary beat frequency was increased by IB-MECA in a concentration-dependent manner, the maximal increase being 33%, and this effect was inhibited by MRS-1220. The IB-MECA-induced ciliary stimulation was not altered by the Rp diastereomer of cAMP but was greatly inhibited by Ca(2+)-free medium containing BAPTA-AM. Incubation with IB-MECA increased intracellular Ca(2+) contents. Therefore, A(3) agonist enhances airway mucociliary clearance probably through Ca(2+)-mediated stimulation of ciliary motility of airway epithelium.