Impaired secretion of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 by allergen-specific T cells correlates with defective nuclear expression of NF-AT2 and jun B: relevance to immunotherapy

Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy supporting its disease-modifying effect

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is considered the only disease-modifying treatment available at present for allergic disorders. Its main benefits include improvement of symptoms, decreased need for pharmacotherapy, prevention of new sensitizations and sustained effect after AIT completion. The key pillars of AIT-induced tolerance include a shift from Th2 to Th1 response, an increase of regulatory T and B cells, pro-inflammatory effector cell downregulation and IgE suppression, in addition to IgG4, IgA and IgD induction. AIT may also induce trained immunity, characterized by a durable decrease in group 2 of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and increased ILC1 and ILC3s. Understanding the immune mechanisms of AIT is essential for validating biomarkers for the prediction of AIT response and for achieving AIT success.

Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy for inhaled allergens and predictive biomarkers

Allergen immunotherapy is effective in patients with IgE-dependent allergic rhinitis and asthma. When immunotherapy is given continuously for 3 years, there is persistent clinical benefit for several years after its discontinuation. This disease-modifying effect is both antigen-specific and antigen-driven. Clinical improvement is accompanied by decreases in numbers of effector cells in target organs, including mast cells, basophils, eosinophils, and type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunotherapy results in the production of blocking IgG/IgG₄ antibodies that can inhibit IgE-dependent activation mediated through both high-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI) on mast cells and basophils and low-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRII) on B cells. Suppression of T_H2 immunity can occur as a consequence of either deletion or anergy of antigen-specific T cells; induction of antigen-specific regulatory T cells; or immune deviation in favor of T_H1 responses. It is not clear whether the altered long-term memory resides within the T-cell or the B-cell compartment. Recent data highlight the role of IL-10-producing regulatory B cells and "protective" antibodies that likely contribute to long-term tolerance. Understanding mechanisms underlying induction and persistence of tolerance should identify predictive biomarkers of clinical response and discover novel and more effective strategies for immunotherapy.

Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: an EAACI Position Paper

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) with or without asthma. It is important to note that due to the complex interaction between patient, allergy triggers, symptomatology and vaccines used for AIT, some patients do not respond optimally to the treatment. Furthermore, there are no validated or generally accepted candidate biomarkers that are predictive of the clinical response to AIT. Clinical management of patients receiving AIT and efficacy in randomised controlled trials for drug development could be enhanced by predictive biomarkers.

METHOD

The EAACI taskforce reviewed all candidate biomarkers used in clinical trials of AR patients with/without asthma in a literature review. Biomarkers were grouped into seven domains: (i) IgE (total IgE, specific IgE and sIgE/Total IgE ratio), (ii) IgG-subclasses (sIgG1, sIgG4 including SIgE/IgG4 ratio), (iii) Serum inhibitory activity for IgE (IgE-FAB and IgE-BF), (iv) Basophil activation, (v) Cytokines and Chemokines, (vi) Cellular markers (T regulatory cells, B regulatory cells and dendritic cells) and (vii) In vivo biomarkers (including provocation tests?).

RESULTS

All biomarkers were reviewed in the light of their potential advantages as well as their respective drawbacks. Unmet needs and specific recommendations on all seven domains were addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended to explore the use of allergen-specific IgG4 as a biomarker for compliance. sIgE/tIgE and IgE-FAB are considered as potential surrogate candidate biomarkers. Cytokine/chemokines and cellular reponses provided insight into the mechanisms of AIT. More studies for confirmation and interpretation of the possible association with the clinical response to AIT are needed.

Applications and mechanisms of immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis and asthma

Clinical and immunologic tolerance are hallmarks of successful allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Clinical benefits such as reduced symptoms, pharmacotherapy intake and improvement of quality of life persist following cessation of treatment. Successful AIT is associated with suppression of allergic inflammatory cells such as mast cells, eosinophils and basophils in target organs. Furthermore, AIT down-regulates type 2 innate lymphoid cells and allergen-specific type 2 T-helper (Th2) cells. The immunologic tolerant state following AIT is associated with the induction of distinct phenotypes of regulatory T-cells (T-regs) including interleukin (IL)-10-, IL-35- and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β- producing T-regs and FoxP3⁺ T-regs. B-cell responses, including the induction of IL-10⁺ regulatory B-cells (B-regs) and the production of IgG4-associated blocking antibodies are also induced following successful AIT. These events are associated with the suppression of antigen-specific Th2 responses and delayed immune deviation in favour of Th1 type responses. Insight into the mechanisms of AIT has allowed identification of novel biomarkers with potential to predict the clinical response to AIT and also novel therapeutic strategies for more effective and safer AIT.

Allergen specific sublingual immunotherapy in children with asthma and allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) is significantly increased, especially in younger children. Current treatment for children with asthma and allergic rhinitis include allergen avoidance, standard pharmacotherapy, and immunotherapy. Since standard pharmacotherapy is prescribed for symptoms, immunotherapy at present plays an important role in the treatment of allergic diseases. This article presents insights into the up-to-date understanding of immunotherapy in the treatment of children with allergic rhinitis and asthma.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed articles published from 1990 to 2014 were reviewed using the MeSH terms "asthma", "allergic rhinitis", "children", and "immune therapy". Additional articles were identified by hand searching of the references in the initial search.

RESULTS

Numerous studies have shown that sublingual application of allergen specific immunotherapy (SLIT) is an adequate, safe and efficient substitution to subcutaneous route of allergens administration (SCIT) in the treatment of IgE-mediated respiratory tract allergies in children. According to the literature, better clinical efficacy is connected with the duration of treatment and mono sensitized patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At least 3 years of treatment and stable asthma before the immunotherapy are positive predictors of good clinical efficacy and tolerability of SLIT. SLIT reduces the symptoms of allergic diseases and the use of medicaments, and improves the quality of life of children with the diseases.

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic respiratory diseases

Allergen specific immunotherapy involves the repeated administration of allergen products in order to induce clinical and immunologic tolerance to the offending allergen. Immunotherapy is the only etiology-based treatment that has the potential for disease modification, as reflected by longterm remission following its discontinuation and possibly prevention of disease progression and onset of new allergic sensitizations. Whereas subcutaneous immunotherapy is of proven value in allergic rhinitis and asthma there is a risk of untoward side effects including rarely anaphylaxis. Recently the sublingual route has emerged as an effective and safer alternative. Whereas the efficacy of SLIT in seasonal allergy is now well-documented in adults and children, the available data for perennial allergies and asthma is less reliable and particularly lacking in children. This review evaluates the efficacy, safety and longterm benefits of SCIT and SLIT and highlights new findings regarding mechanisms, potential biomarkers and recent novel approaches for allergen immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy in asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways in which many cells and cellular elements play a role. Chronic inflammation is associated with airway hyper-responsiveness that leads to recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness and coughing, as well as variable airflow obstruction within the lung. With time, such airflow obstruction may become permanent due to remodeling. It has been treated for more than 100 years by subcutaneous immunotherapy with allergen extracts but in recent years, other forms and types of immunotherapy have been introduced. Perhaps the most successful of these to date, is sublingual immunotherapy, which has attained significant usage in European countries but has yet to make inroads into clinical practice in North America. Other mechanisms to modify the inflammatory responses of asthma have included immunotherapy with recombinant allergens, the use of allergen peptides targeting antigen-specific T cells and the administration of Toll-like receptor agonists coupled to allergen proteins. As the inflammatory responses in asthma frequently involve IgE, a modified monoclonal antibody to IgE and interfering with its binding to the IgE receptor have gained acceptance for treating severe allergic asthma. Other monoclonal antibodies or recombinant receptor antagonists are being assessed for their ability to block other contributors to the inflammatory response. Finally, attempts have been made to generate autoantibody responses to cytokines implicated in asthma. Most of these therapies aim to modify or inhibit the so-called Th 2 immune response, which is implicated in many forms of asthma, or to inhibit cytokines involved in these responses. However, an added benefit of classical immunotherapy seems to be the ability to prevent the allergic progression to new sensitivities and new forms of allergic disease.

Clinical practice: Allergen-specific immunotherapy in children: facts and FAQs

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) in its various application forms represents the main treatment approach of IgE-mediated allergic diseases in adults and children. Despite this clear recommendation, many particularities of products, patient characteristics, and product availability in different countries hamper the use of allergen-specific immunotherapy in particular in children. The frequently asked questions by parents, patients, and physicians are the backbone of this review. Thus, the potentials and limitations of allergen-specific immunotherapy in children and adolescents will be highlighted. IgE-mediated allergic diseases are affecting about 20% of the population. They manifest commonly early in life, and hence, the use of SIT should be considered also early in the course of the disease.

[Allergen-specific Immunotherapy for children and adolescents - a review on available products in Austria]

A pediatric consensus report on allergen-specific immunotherapy for children and adolescents is presented for Austria. Products on the market in Austria are presented and categorised according to studies performed on the target population of children and adolescents, their effectiveness and indication. In general, more clinical studies on children and adolescents are mandatory for most of the available allergen-specific immunotherapeutics. In addition, the use of allergen-specific immunotherapy in general should be promoted as the exclusive treatment with long-lasting effects in type I allergies in particular in children.

The regulation of allergy and asthma

Allergic diseases and asthma are caused by exaggerated T-helper 2 (Th2)-biased immune responses in genetically susceptible individuals. Tolerance to allergens is a mechanism that normally prevents such responses, but the specific immunological events that mediate tolerance in this setting are poorly understood. A number of recent studies indicate that regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an important role in controlling such Th2-biased responses. Tregs involved in regulating allergy and asthma consist of a family of related types of T cells, including natural CD25+ Tregs as well as inducible forms of antigen-specific adaptive Tregs. Impaired expansion of natural and/or adaptive Tregs is hypothesized to lead to the development of allergy and asthma, and treatment to induce allergen-specific Tregs could provide curative therapies for these problems.

Sublingual immunotherapy of allergic diseases

The only disease-modifying treatment that is available for allergic patients is allergen-specific immunotherapy. Two competing application forms are used: subcutaneous immunotherapy, which has been used for > 90 years, and a relatively new immunotherapy where the allergen is applied sublingually. Numerous studies have shown efficacy for subcutaneous immunotherapy and have identified possible mechanisms that are responsible for the observed reduction in allergic responses. In contrast, the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy has not been documented to the same degree and the responsible immunological mechanisms have not yet been clearly defined. This review focuses on the published clinical and experimental data on sublingual immunotherapy and points at possible mechanisms of how sublingual immunotherapy may differ from subcutaneous immunotherapy in its mode of action, and also discusses the potential advantages and pit falls of both therapies.

Inhibition of the allergic response by regulatory T cells

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergic diseases are caused by the overdevelopment of T-helper type 2 biased immune responses in susceptible individuals. A number of recent studies indicate that regulatory T cells play an important role in controlling such T-helper type 2 biased responses not only in animal models, but in humans as well, and these will be reviewed in this article.

RECENT FINDINGS

A family of regulatory cells appears to be involved in regulating allergies. Both naturally occurring CD4CD25 regulatory T cells and inducible forms of antigen-specific regulatory T cells, both expressing the transcription factor foxp3, have been shown to inhibit the inappropriate immune responses involved in allergic diseases. Impaired expansion of natural or adaptive regulatory T cells is hypothesized to lead to the development of allergy, and treatment to induce allergen-specific regulatory T cells could provide curative therapies for allergy and asthma.

SUMMARY

Allergen-specific regulatory T cells play an important role in controlling the development of allergy and asthma.

Immune mechanisms of allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy

Sublingual immunotherapy has been shown in some clinical studies to modulate allergen-specific antibody responses [with a decrease in the immunoglobulin E/immunoglobulin G4 (IgE/IgG4) ratio] and to reduce the recruitment and activation of proinflammatory cells in target mucosa. Whereas a central paradigm for successful immunotherapy has been to reorient the pattern of allergen-specific T-cell responses in atopic patients from a T helper (Th)2 to Th1 profile, there is currently a growing interest in eliciting regulatory T cells, capable of downregulating both Th1 and Th2 responses through the production of interleukin (IL)-10 and/or transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. We discuss herein immune mechanisms involved during allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), in comparison with subcutaneous immunotherapy. During SLIT, the allergen is captured within the oral mucosa by Langerhans-like dendritic cells expressing high-affinity IgE receptors, producing IL-10 and TGF-beta, and upregulating indoleamine dioxygenase (IDO), suggesting that such cells are prone to induce tolerance. The oral mucosa contains limited number of proinflammatory cells, such as mast cells, thereby explaining the well-established safety profile of SLIT. In this context, second-generation vaccines based on recombinant allergens in a native conformation formulated with adjuvants are designed to target Langerhans-like cells in the sublingual mucosa, with the aim to induce allergen-specific regulatory T cells. Importantly, such recombinant vaccines should facilitate the identification of biological markers of SLIT efficacy in humans.

Reversing the defective induction of IL-10-secreting regulatory T cells in glucocorticoid-resistant asthma patients

We previously reported that human CD4+ Tregs secrete high levels of IL-10 when stimulated in the presence of dexamethasone and calcitriol (vitamin D3). We now show that following stimulation by allergen, IL-10-secreting Tregs inhibit cytokine secretion by allergen-specific Th2 cells in an IL-10-dependent manner. A proportion of patients with severe asthma fail to demonstrate clinical improvement upon glucocorticoid therapy, and their asthma is characterized as glucocorticoid resistant (SR, abbreviation derived from "steroid resistant"). Dexamethasone does not enhance secretion of IL-10 by their CD4+ T cells. Addition of vitamin D3 with dexamethasone to cultures of SR CD4+ T cells enhanced IL-10 synthesis to levels observed in cells from glucocorticoid-sensitive patients cultured with dexamethasone alone. Furthermore, pretreatment with IL-10 fully restored IL-10 synthesis in these cells in response to dexamethasone. Vitamin D3 significantly overcame the inhibition of glucocorticoid-receptor expression by dexamethasone while IL-10 upregulated glucocorticoid-receptor expression by CD4+ T cells, suggesting potential mechanisms whereby these treatments may overcome poor glucocorticoid responsiveness. We show here that administration of vitamin D3 to healthy individuals and SR asthmatic patients enhanced subsequent responsiveness to dexamethasone for induction of IL-10. This strongly suggests that vitamin D3 could potentially increase the therapeutic response to glucocorticoids in SR patients.

Inhibitory activity of a ceramide library on interleukin-4 production from activated T cells

Allergic diseases are hypersensitivity disorders associated with the production of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to environmental allergens. Interleukin (IL)-4, produced primarily by CD4(+) T cells, is an important stimulus for the switch of the antibody isotype to IgE in both mice and humans. In this study we investigated the inhibitory activity of IL-4 production in activated T cells by screening ceramide derivatives prepared by solid phase combinatorial chemistry. Many ceramide derivatives significantly inhibited IL-4 production in T cells. In particular, ceramide derivatives with a lauroyl group showed strong inhibitory activities on IL-4 production in both phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-activated EL4 T cells and antigen-primed cells, suggesting that they can be used as compounds for the development of anti-allergic agents.

Potential role of interleukin-10-secreting regulatory T cells in allergy and asthma

Allergic diseases are caused by aberrant T-helper-2 immune responses in susceptible individuals. Both naturally occurring CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells and inducible populations of antigen-specific interleukin-10-secreting regulatory T cells inhibit these inappropriate immune responses in experimental models. This article discusses the evidence that regulatory T-cell function might be impaired in allergic and asthmatic disease and that certain therapeutic regimens might function, at least in part, to promote regulatory T-cell generation. Current research strategies seek to exploit these observations to improve the generation of allergen-specific regulatory T-cell populations with the potential to provide the safe and long-term alleviation of disease symptoms.

[The significance of interleukins and of Candida-IgE in chronic recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis]

We examined 104 patients with chronic recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis; 41 healthy women were selected for the control group. Vaginal samples were taken, and yeasts were grown and tested for Candida strains: 29.8% of samples contained Candida spp.; two of the control women were infected. We also identified interleukin IL-4, 5 and 13, but there was only significant increase in IL-4. In addition, prostaglandin E2, whole IgE and Candida-specific-IgE was identified. Also here prostaglandin E2 and the Candida IgE were significantly higher in comparison with the control group, while whole IgE showed no significant increase. This resulted in an allergic component in the chronic recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis, which suggested that therapy should be reconsidered.

Neuroendocrine mechanisms of immune dysregulation: applications to allergy and asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the current information and hypotheses related to the underlying mechanisms that link psychological stress and asthma activity via a neuroimmune network dysfunction that may manifest as increased morbidity of immune diseases, such as asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Literature searches of MEDLINE for published human and animal studies and review articles published in English-language periodicals. Keywords searched included individual and various combinations of psychoneuroimmunology, neuroimmune, neuroimmunology, stress, immunity, allergy, asthma, and inflammation. Both review articles and specific hypothesis-driven articles that focused on immune effects of stress were included. Manuscripts that focused on animal studies were excluded from this review.

STUDY SELECTION

Representative studies that reflect the consensus of the field based on the expert opinion of the author.

RESULTS

This article demonstrates the established relationships between the neuroendocrine and immune systems and the impact of both acute and chronic psychological stress on neuroendocrine and immune network function. The adverse impact of stress appears to occur more on immune dysregulation rather than immune suppression.

CONCLUSION

Psychological stress, allergy and asthma morbidity, and allergy and asthma incidence are all steadily increasing in our society. Establishing a firm relationship can provide a possible new therapeutic direction for evaluation and management of difficult-to-treat patients and possible prophylactic strategies in susceptible populations.