The effect of G-CSF on the composition of human bone marrow

Effects of continuous high-dose G-CSF administration on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and telomere length in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a pilot study

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of complex and still poorly understood etiology. Loss of upper and lower motoneurons results in death within few years after diagnosis. Recent studies have proposed neuroprotective and disease-slowing effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment in ALS mouse models as well as humans. In this study, six ALS patients were monitored up to 3.5 years during continuous high-dose G-CSF administration. Repetitive analyses were performed including blood count parameters, CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) and colony forming cell (CFC) counts, serum cytokine levels and leukocyte telomere length. We demonstrate that continuous G-CSF therapy was well tolerated and safe resulting in only mild adverse events during the observation period. However, no mobilization of CD34⁺ HSPC was detected as compared to baseline values. CFC mobilization was equally low and even a decrease of myeloid precursors was observed in some patients. Assessment of telomere length within ALS patients' leukocytes revealed that G-CSF did not significantly shorten telomeres, while those of ALS patients were shorter compared to age-matched healthy controls, irrespective of G-CSF treatment. During G-CSF stimulation, TNF-alpha, CRP, IL-16, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, Tie-2 and VEGF were significantly increased in serum whereas MCP-1 levels decreased. In conclusion, our data show that continuous G-CSF treatment fails to increase circulating CD34⁺ HSPC in ALS patients. Cytokine profiles revealed G-CSF-mediated immunomodulatory and proteolytic effects. Interestingly, despite intense G-CSF stimulation, telomere length was not significantly shortened.

The effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on MR images of bone marrow

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) analogs such as filgrastim/pegfilgrastim are increasingly used to enhance neutrophilic recovery after chemotherapy. It is widely known that, physiologically, pegfilgrastim stimulates marrow mitotic activity and induces marrow reconversion from fatty to cellular. However, there is limited literature discussing the effects of pegfilgrastim on musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging, with the consensus that marrow reconversion secondary to pegfilgrastim therapy is easily confounded with a malignant process, especially in patients with a history of cancer. We attempt to discuss the expected changes and MRI findings after pegfilgrastim therapy through a summary of current literature. Additionally, we provide images from our own practice to support the previously established findings. G-CSF-stimulated reconversion can appear as patchy expansions of baseline hematopoietic marrow, but can also appear to be diffusely homogeneous, adding to its ambiguity. We conclude that using a baseline MRI, clinical information, and assessing sequential MRI changes in conjunction with pegfilgrastim therapy may aid the differentiation between benign and pathological change. We expand our discussion to include the effects of novel technologies, such as whole-body MRI, chemical shift imaging, and contrast agents in helping the distinction.

Safety and feasibility of long term administration of recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neuronal disease resulting in a loss of the upper and lower motor neurons and subsequent death within three to four years after diagnosis. Mouse models and preliminary human exposure data suggest that the treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has neuro-protective effects and may delay ALS progression. As data on long-term administration of G-CSF in patients with normal bone marrow (BM) function are scarce, we initiated a compassionate use program including 6 ALS patients with monthly G-CSF treatment cycles. Here we demonstrate that G-CSF injection was safe and feasible throughout our observation period up to three years. Significant decrease of mobilization efficiency occurred in one patient and a loss of immature erythroid progenitors was observed in all six patients. These data imply that follow-up studies analyzing BM function during long-term G-CSF stimulation are required.

A randomized controlled clinical trial to determine the optimum duration of G-CSF priming prior to BM stem cell harvesting

BACKGROUND

Harvesting of hemopoietic stem cells (HSC) from G-CSF-primed BM for autologous transplantation is an alternative to collection of unprimed BM or G-CSF-primed peripheral blood (PB). However, the optimum number of days of G-CSF administration for this purpose is unknown. We set out to determine whether cell yields could be optimized by varying the number of days of G-CSF administration prior to BM stem cell harvesting.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled single-center trial of 6 days (the standard) vs. 4 days of G-CSF administration and compared yields of total nucleated cells (TNC), CD34(+) HSC and CFU-GM cells per kilogram patient body weight. Statistical analysis was by Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 13 received 6 days and 11 received 4 days of G-CSF administration. Analysis of the first harvest aspirate showed higher proportions of CD34(+) HSC (P=0.02) and CFU-GM (P=0.03) in the 4-day group. For the 6-day and 4-day groups, respectively, the median yield of TNC/kg was 6.5 x 10(8) and 5.4 x 10(8) (P=0.28), of CD34(+) cells/kg 0.56 x 10(6) and 0.98 x 10(6) (P=0.04) and of CFU-GM cells/kg 1.66 x 10(5) and 1.55 x 10(5) (P=0.75).

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that by 6 days the HSC-stimulating effect of G-CSF has passed its peak and that 4 days should be adopted as the standard for G-CSF priming prior to BM stem cell harvesting for autologous transplantation.

Morphologic examination of sequential bone marrow biopsies after nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation complements molecular studies of donor engraftment

CONTEXT

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NMSCT) is a mode of immunotherapy increasingly employed in treating hematologic, lymphoid, and solid tumors. Patients are monitored principally by molecular analysis of donor engraftment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of morphologic examination of bone marrow after NMSCT.

DESIGN

Seventy-three patients undergoing NMSCT under the Campath 1H (humanized anti-CD52 antibody) protocol were studied. Pretransplant and sequential posttransplant bone marrow specimens were evaluated and the findings were correlated with corresponding engraftment data.

RESULTS

Pretransplant bone marrow specimens from 43% of the patients were involved by disease, and these marrow specimens were significantly more cellular than those that were free of disease. Morphologically detectable disease was still present in day 14 posttransplant marrow specimens in more than one half of these patients, but there was no difference in engraftment in those with or without marrow disease. Early posttransplant marrow in nearly one half of the patients showed myeloid hyperplasia and atypical localization of immature myeloid precursors. Marrow cellularity for the first 2 months after NMSCT was significantly lower in those patients receiving stem cells mismatched at 1 to 3 loci as compared with those who received fully matched grafts (mean cellularity, 38.1% vs 54.1% at day 14). Marrow failure without recurrent disease at 3 to 6 months after transplant was detected by engraftment study in only approximately 15% of cases. Similarly, early recurrence of disease was detected first by morphologic examination in 4 of 13 cases before a decline in donor engraftment occurred.

CONCLUSION

Morphologic examination of bone marrow provides additional information that is complementary to donor engraftment analysis for optimal management after NMSCT.

Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-supported chemotherapy on MR imaging of normal red bone marrow in breast cancer patients with focal bone metastases

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-supported chemotherapy on normal red bone marrow MR imaging in breast cancer patients with focal bone metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen breast cancer patients who were examined before and after chemotherapy with T1-weighted-SE and long echo-time inversion-recovery turbo-spin-echo (long TE IR-TSE) sequences in the thoracolumbar spine and pelvis were retrospectively studied. Nine of them received G-CSF therapy after the administration of each chemotherapy course. Of these 9 patients, the MR follow-ups were performed during G-CSF in 4 patients and after G-CSF therapy in 5 patients. Six patients did not receive G-CSF. Signal intensity (SI) changes in normal bone marrow were evaluated visually in all patients and quantitatively in 13 patients.

RESULTS

In all 4 patients investigated during G-CSF therapy a diffuse, homogeneous SI increase on long TE IR-TSE was observed visually and quantitatively in initially normal bone marrow. This change obscured some focal lesions in 2 patients. No such SI change was visible after G-CSF therapy (p = 0.008) or in patients not receiving G-CSF. On T1-weighted images an SI decrease was found both during and after G-CSF therapy, but an increase occurred in patients not receiving G-CSF.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF-supported chemotherapy can induce diffuse SI changes in normal red bone marrow on MR imaging. On long TE IR-TSE, the changes are visible during G-CSF treatment and can lead to misinterpretations in the response evaluation of bone metastases to therapy.

Clinical practice and future needs in recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment: a review of randomized trials in clinical haemato-oncology

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) may have a significant impact on preventing infections associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, as well as shortening time to tree lineage engraftment following high-dose chemotherapy and progenitor transplantation. However, the scientific literature documenting evidence-based practice is insufficient and often misinterpreted. This review presents data and discusses the evidence for actual clinical practice in the use of rHuG-CSF in conventional cyclic chemotherapy, either prophylactic or therapeutic, and high-dose therapy, either in priming for mobilization or post-transplantation. In the past decade, many reports have based their conclusions on surrogate markers, and it is time to move towards evaluation of clinically relevant factors. Data must be generated prospectively based on current clinical practice, and several issues must be considered and evaluated to define the true clinical benefit of rHuG-CSF with or without stem-cell support. Evaluation should include complications and needs for resources as well as impact on toxicity and efficacy of conventional or high-dose chemotherapy.