Comparison of monthly intramuscular injections of Sandostatin LAR with multiple subcutaneous injections of octreotide in the treatment of acromegaly; effects on growth hormone and other markers of growth hormone secretion

Twenty-four-hour growth hormone profiling in the assessment of acromegaly

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines recommend insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), random growth hormone (GH) and nadir GH on an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for assessment of acromegaly. At this Regional Centre, the 24-hour GH profile has also been used.

DESIGN PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

We evaluated 57 GH profiles from 34 patients from 2008 to 2012. Samples were drawn every 2 hour and matched with 0800 GH, nadir GH after OGTT and IGF-1.

RESULTS

Correlations between the mean 13-point profiles and mean 5-point profile, OGTT nadir and 0800 GH were as follows: r = .99, .99 and .90, respectively (P < .01 for all). The correlation between the mean 13-point profiles and IGF-1 was r = .32 P = .02.Of 5 patients with very high 0800 GH preoperatively (≥20 μg/L), mean 13-point GH reduced by 88%-99% postoperatively. IGF-1 did not normalize in these patients, and all required extra treatment. Preoperatively, all patients had concordant 0800 GH and IGF-1. Postoperatively, 6 patients had 0800 GH <1 μg/L and high IGF-1; only 2 of these had a 13-point mean >1 μg/L, but 5 required further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Growth hormone profiling is not necessary for assessing the majority of patients with acromegaly if there is confidence in the local IGF-1 assay. When undertaken, a 5-point profile is adequate. In patients with very high 0800 GH, 24-hour profiling was useful in demonstrating partial therapeutic success but did not alter management. Further work is needed to explore the possible role of GH profiling in stratifying patients with discordant IGF-1 and GH results.

Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA)

Since 1997 there is an online National Registry of acromegalic patients in Spain (REA). We aimed to study changes in acromegaly treatment and outcomes over the last four decades in Spain. In REA clinical and biochemical data are collected at diagnosis and updated every one to 2 years. We analyzed the first treatment received and the different treatments administered according to decade of diagnosis of acromegaly: prior to 1980, 1980-1989, 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. Surgical cure rates according to pretreatment with long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) were also analyzed. 1,658 patients were included of which 698 had accurate follow-up data. Treatment of acromegaly changed over time. Surgery was the main treatment option (83.8 %) and medical treatment was widely used (74.7 %) both maintained over decades, while radiation therapy declined (62.8, 61.6, 42.2 and 11.9 % over decades, p < 0.001). First treatment type also changed: surgery was the first line option up until the last decade in which medical treatment was preferred (p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was barely used as first treatment. Treatment combinations changed over time (p < 0.001). The most common treatment combination (surgery plus medical therapy), was received by 24.4, 16.4, 25.3 and 56.5 % of patients over decades. Medical treatment alone was performed in 7.3, 6, 7.2 and 14.7 % over decades. Type of medical treatment also changed, SRLs becoming the first medical treatment modality in the last decades, whereas dopamine agonist use declined (p < 0.001). Surgical cure rates improved over decades (21, 21, 36 and 38 %, p = 0.002) and were not influenced by SRL pre-surgical use. Acromegaly treatment has changed in Spain in the last four decades. Surgery has been the main treatment option for decades; however, medical therapy has replaced surgery as first line in the last decade and radiotherapy rates have clearly declined. SRLs are the most used medical treatment.

Resistance to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly

Somatostatin analogs (SA) are widely used in acromegaly, either as first-line or adjuvant treatment after surgery. First-line treatment with these drugs is generally used in the patients with macroadenomas or in those with clinical conditions so severe as to prevent unsafe reactions during anesthesia. Generally, the response to SA takes into account both control of GH and IGF-I excess, with consequent improvement of clinical symptoms directly related to GH and IGF-I excess, and tumor shrinkage. This latter effect is more prominent in the patients treated first-line and bearing large macroadenomas, but it is also observed in patients with microadenomas, even with little clinical implication. Predictors of response are patients' gender, age, initial GH and IGF-I levels, and tumor mass, as well as adequate expression of somatostatin receptor types 2 and 5, those with the highest affinity for octreotide and lanreotide. Only sporadic cases of somatostatin receptor gene mutation or impaired signaling pathways have been described in GH-secreting tumors so far. The response to SA also depends on treatment duration and dosage of the drug used, so that a definition of resistance based on short-term treatments using low doses of long-acting SA is limited. Current data suggest that response to these drugs is better analyzed taking together biochemical and tumoral effects because only the absence of both responses might be considered as a poor response or resistance. This latter evidence seems to occur in 25% of treated patients after 12 months of currently available long-acting SA.

A critical analysis of clinically available somatostatin analog formulations for therapy of acromegaly

CONTEXT

Short and long-acting somatostatin (SRIF) analogs are approved for clinical use in acromegaly. Recent analysis of the relative efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR on the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly favored octreotide LAR in the secondary treatment of patients not preselected by SRIF responsiveness. A novel aqueous formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide Autogel (ATG), has recently been approved and is the predominant (and only in the United States) formulation of lanreotide used clinically.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a critical review of SRIF analog treatment to establish the relative efficacy of three clinically available SRIF analog preparations, octreotide LAR, lanreotide SR, and lanreotide ATG (Somatuline depot in the United States) in control of the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly.

DATA SOURCES

Data were drawn from MEDLINE and the bibliography of analyses of long-acting SRIF analogs.

DATA COLLECTION

We reviewed the largest studies of sc octreotide, octreotide LAR, and lanreotide SR, all that included biochemical end-point data for lanreotide ATG, and studies that directly compared the efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Caveats considered included differences in baseline GH and IGF-I values, patient selection, and interassay and intraassay variability, confounding the analysis. Studies comparing patients treated contiguously with lanreotide SR and octreotide LAR are fraught with methodological problems, however, are suggestive of marginally greater efficacy in control of the GH-IGF-I axis for octreotide LAR. Lanreotide ATG shows noninferiority to lanreotide SR. Five small studies directly comparing octreotide LAR and lanreotide ATG suggest no significant differences between these preparations in control of biochemical end-points.

CONCLUSION

Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR are equivalent in the control of symptoms and biochemical markers in patients with acromegaly.

Deterioration of glycemic control during octreotide LAR treatment in an acromegalic Japanese patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus

We report a case showing deterioration of glycemic control during octreotide long-acting release (LAR) treatment in an acromegalic Japanese patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The patient did not show much improvement of insulin sensitivity (QUICKI; 0.33 before treatment, 0.35 during octreotide LAR treatment), and showed a significant reduction in early insulin secretion (insulinogenic index; 0.28 before treatment, 0.08 during octreotide LAR treatment) on 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75gOGTT), despite decreases in GH and IGF-I levels during the course of octreotide LAR treatment. Postoperatively, both insulin sensitivity and early insulin secretion on 75gOGTT were improved (QUICKI 0.59, insulinogenic index 0.35). There are some reports that insulinogenic index is lower in most Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and that early insulin secretions are significantly suppressed after administration of octreotide LAR. Although the influence of octreotide LAR on glucose metabolism varies among individuals, it is necessary to manage the deterioration of glucose tolerance during octreotide LAR treatment in acromegalic Japanese patients with decreased insulinogenic index.

Current pharmacotherapy for acromegaly: a review

Acromegaly is associated with considerable morbidity and excess mortality; however, after effective treatment, both morbidity and mortality risks improve. Growth hormone excess in acromegaly can be controlled in many patients by pharmacotherapy alone, and with a combination of transsphenoidal surgery and pharmacotherapy in almost all patients. Since the clinical introduction of pegvisomant, a growth hormone-receptor antagonist, the role of radiotherapy is restricted. This review focuses on the treatment options for acromegaly (e.g., surgery, radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy with the depot preparations of the somatostatin analogues octreotide long-acting release formulation, lanreotide slow-release formulation and lanreotide Autogel, the growth hormone antagonist pegvisomant and the dopamine agonist cabergoline). Pharmacological characteristics of these drugs and the clinical and adverse effects are discussed individually and in relation to the other treatment modalities. The evidence for biochemical goals aimed at during medical treatment and the costs of pharmacotherapy are discussed. A new treatment algorithm is proposed, in which the choice between primary medical treatment and primary surgery is individualised, dependent on adenoma size and extension, patient factors (age, preference for therapy, contraindication for surgery), surgical experience of the centre and octreotide sensitivity of the adenoma. The high cost of lifelong medical treatment, especially of pegvisomant, must be weighed against the cost of a single surgical procedure.

PEGylation of Octreotide: II. Effect of N-terminal Mono-PEGylation on Biological Activity and Pharmacokinetics

PURPOSE

: To determine the optimal polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugate of octreotide by evaluating the effects of PEGylation chemistry on the biological activity and pharmacokinetic properties.

METHODS

: Octreotide was chemically modified by reaction with succinimidyl propionate monomethoxy PEG (SPA-mPEG, molecular weight 2000) or succinimidyl butyraldehyde-mPEG (ALD-mPEG, molecular weight 2000 and 5000). The structural conformation of PEG-octreotides was evaluated by circular dichroism (CD), the biological activity was assessed by measuring the decrease of serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels in rats, and a pharmacokinetic study was performed after subcutaneous administration in rats. The stability against acylation was investigated with poly(D,L -lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA).

RESULTS

: ALD-mPEG was site-specific in PEGylating octreotide at the N-terminus. The mono-PEG-octreotides prepared with ALD-mPEG (mono-ALDPEG-octreotide), which alkyl bond preserves the amine's positive charge, showed complete preservation of biological activity, whereas the PEG-octreotides prepared with SPA-mPEG showed lower activity. In the CD analysis, the spectra of the mono-ALDPEG-octreotides were nearly superimposable with that of native octreotide. The mono-ALDPEG-5K-octreotide showed significantly improved pharmacokinetic properties compared with mono-ALDPEG-2K-octreotide as well as native octreotide. Both mono-ALDPEG-2K- and mono-ALDPEG-5K-octreotides were stable against acylation by degrading PLGA.

CONCLUSIONS

: The mono-PEGylation of octreotide at N-terminus with ALD-mPEG produced a conjugate that is biologically and structurally active and stable against acylation by PLGA, and therefore it may serve as a candidate for somatostatin microsphere formulations.

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) is a somatostatin analogue designed for once monthly intramuscular injection. As with endogenous somatostatin, octreotide LAR inhibits secretion of growth hormone (GH) as well as various other peptide hormones. In the treatment of acromegaly, octreotide LAR effectively controlled the secretion of GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in about 55-70% of patients (n > 100) who had previously been treated with somatostatin analogues, a similar degree of control to that observed with subcutaneous octreotide and lanreotide slow release (SR). Progressive control of serum levels of GH and IGF-1 was achieved with octreotide LAR in clinical studies of up to 4 years' duration. In addition, primary therapy with octreotide LAR provided effective control of GH and IGF-1 secretion, particularly in patients with a pretreatment GH level <20 microg/L. The percentage of patients achieving a target serum GH level of <2-2.5 micro g/L or normal IGF-1 levels was significantly greater with octreotide LAR 10, 20 or 30 mg every 28 days than with lanreotide SR 30 mg every 7-14 days in a large (n = 125) sequential, 6-month study, but was not significantly different between treatment groups in a small, randomised, nonblind, parallel group study of previously untreated patients. The volume of pituitary tumour shrinkage achieved with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR was also similar ( approximate, equals 33% after 24 months). Acromegaly symptoms, such as headache, increased perspiration, paraesthesia, fatigue and osteoarthralgia were improved during treatment with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR. Overall, octreotide LAR is generally well tolerated by most patients. The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms is about 30% but, in most cases, events are transient and mild to moderate. Gallbladder abnormalities (sediment, sludge, microlithiasis and gallstones) can occur, but only 1% have become symptomatic to date. The prevalence of biliary abnormalities did not change after switching from subcutaneous octreotide, or from lanreotide SR, to octreotide LAR. Glucose metabolism can be affected by octreotide LAR in some patients; about 15% become hyperglycaemic, usually mild in severity. In summary, octreotide LAR controls GH and IGF-1 secretion in about 55-70% of patients with acromegaly. Octreotide LAR is administered intramuscularly every 28 days, offering improved patient compliance and convenience over three-times-daily subcutaneous octreotide. Long-term therapy provides progressive control of serum GH and IGF-1 levels, and is generally well tolerated by most patients. Thus, for the medical management of acromegaly, octreotide LAR is an effective, well tolerated and convenient treatment option.

Identification of chemically modified peptide from poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres under in vitro release conditions

The purpose of this research was to study the chemical reactivity of a somatostatin analogue, octreotide acetate, formulated in microspheres with polymers of varying molecular weight and co-monomer ratio under in vitro testing conditions. Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and poly(D,L-lactide) (PLA) microspheres were prepared by a solvent extraction/evaporation method. The microspheres were characterized for drug load, impurity content, and particle size. Further, the microspheres were subjected to in vitro release testing in acetate buffer (pH 4.0) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2). In acetate buffer, 3 microsphere batches composed of low molecular weight PLGA 50:50, PLGA 85:15, and PLA polymers (< or =10 kDa) showed 100% release with minimal impurity formation (<10%). The high molecular weight PLGA 50:50 microspheres (28 kDa) displayed only 70% cumulative release in acetate buffer with significant impurity formation (approximately 24%). In PBS (pH 7.4), on the other hand, only 50% release was observed with the same low molecular weight batches (PLGA 50:50, PLGA 85:15, and PLA) with higher percentages of hydrophobic impurity formation (ie, 40%, 26%, and 10%, respectively). In addition, in PBS, the high molecular weight PLGA 50:50 microspheres showed only 20% drug release with ~66% mean impurity content. The chemically modified peptide impurities inside microspheres were structurally confirmed through Fourier transform-mass spectrometry (FT-MS) and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses after extraction procedures. The adduct compounds were identified as covalently modified conjugates of octreotide with lactic and glycolic acid monomers within polymeric microspheres. The data suggest that due to steric hindrance factors, polymers with greater lactide content were less amenable to the formation of adduct impurities compared with PLGA 50:50 copolymers.

Sandostatin LAR in acromegaly: a 6-week injection interval suppresses GH secretion as effectively as a 4-week interval

INTRODUCTION

Depot preparations of long-acting somatostatin analogues are being used increasingly in the treatment of GH hypersecretion in patients with acromegaly, either as primary treatment or as secondary treatment following incomplete surgery. In 60% of these patients, Sandostatin long-acting release (LAR), the depot preparation of octreotide, achieves effective suppression of serum GH (< 5 mU/l) and IGF-I levels. The advice is to administer Sandostatin LAR at 4-week intervals. After injection, serum octreotide shows an initial peak and thereafter maximal values between 14 and 42 days. There have been suggestions that the dose interval of this preparation could be increased, resulting in reduced costs, although this concept has not been confirmed by studies.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We performed a prospective, cohort study in patients with active acromegaly but with normal serum GH and IGF-I levels during Sandostatin LAR treatment to assess whether the dose interval could be safely increased from 4 to 6 weeks, without significant effect on serum GH concentrations or other biochemical and clinical markers of GH hypersecretion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients (seven males) with GH concentrations below 5 mU/l during Sandostatin LAR treatment entered an 8-week withdrawal study following an injection. Subsequently, during an interval study patients received injections at 6-week intervals (t = 0, 8, 14, 20, 26, 32, 38 and 44 weeks). Study parameters (fasting GH, average GH of eight plasma samples, IGF-I, and octreotide concentrations, symptoms score and quality-of-life score) were assessed 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks following the first injection (withdrawal) and at 26 and 44 weeks (interval study) before the next injection.

RESULTS

During the withdrawal study, mean serum GH concentration increased significantly from 1.68 +/- 0.3 at 4 weeks to 2.57 +/- 0.5 mU/l at 6 weeks (P = 0.04, 4 vs. 6 weeks) and to 2.89 +/- 0.4 mU/l at 8 weeks (P < 0.001, 4 vs. 8 weeks). Mean serum GH concentration was below 5 mU/l in all patients at all time points, except for one patient at 8 weeks, and IGF-I levels remained normal in all patients. During withdrawal up to 8 weeks there was no significant change in serum IGF-I concentration, symptoms score or quality-of-life score. Mean serum octreotide decreased significantly from 1610 +/- 355 ng/l at 2 weeks to 1045 +/- 272 ng/l at 6 weeks (P = 0.002, 2 and 4 vs. 6 weeks) and to 559 +/- 147 ng/l at 8 weeks. In the interval study, one patient had mean serum GH above 5 mU/l associated with an increase in symptoms at 26 weeks and she was withdrawn from the study. The remaining 13 patients completed the 6-weekly injection study protocol and in the long term no significant changes in mean serum GH concentration, IGF-I concentration or symptom scores were observed (6 vs. 26 and 44 weeks). All patients had a mean serum GH concentration < 5 mU/l and serum IGF-I remained normal in 11 out of 14 patients at 26 weeks and nine out of 13 patients at 44 weeks. Moreover, the mean octreotide concentrations measured 6 weeks after a Sandostatin LAR injection did not decrease in the long term.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of serum GH concentrations, most patients with serum GH levels < 5 mU/l during Sandostatin LAR treatment using a 4-weekly schedule can be effectively treated with 6-weekly injections. However, during long-term treatment with 6-weekly injections, discordant IGF-I and GH results were observed in 30% of the patients and careful clinical monitoring is therefore required.

Effectiveness of long-acting octreotide in suppressing hormonogenesis and tumor growth in thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas: report of two cases

BACKGROUND

The subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of somatostatin analogs, such as octreotide acetate (SMS) and lanreotide, in patients with thyrotropin (TSH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (TSPA's)--thyrotropinomas with residual tumor after initial surgical therapy is effective in controlling hyperthyroidism, as well as curtailing tumor growth in the majority of patients. Long-acting preparations of the above agents, i.e. SMS-LAR and lanreotide-SR, have been synthesized and can be administered as depot injections intramuscularly (i.m.) at intervals of several weeks. Recent studies have reported on preliminary data regarding the use of such preparations in patients with TSPA's.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present two cases of TSPA's with residual tumor following transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Neither of the two patients underwent external beam pituitary irradiation. The presence and extent of tumoral TSH hypersecretion was assessed by standard biochemical and dynamic endocrine testing, while tumor size was evaluated by conventional radiographic techniques.

RESULTS

In both patients, TSH secretion was effectively suppressed by SMS-LAR. Moreover, administration of this compound halted further tumor growth, as well as resulted in improved patient comfort, for 12 and 10 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our date corroborate earlier reports on the usefulness of SMS-LAR in the medical management of patients with TSPA's who have residual disease after initial pituitary surgery and/or irradiation.

Time course of GH and IGF-1 levels following withdrawal of long-acting octreotide in acromegaly

AIM

Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of octreotide LAR administered intramuscularly at 4-week intervals in the treatment of acromegaly. In contrast, few data are available on the time course of GH and IGF-1 plasma levels following octreotide LAR withdrawal. This prompted us to study these parameters for up to 20 weeks following drug withdrawal in a group of 18 acromegalic patients treated for one year.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We studied 18 patients treated with octreotide LAR 10 mg (n = 2), 20 mg (n = 15) and 30 mg (n = 1) every 4 weeks for one year. GH (mean level during a 4-hour daily profile) and IGF-1 concentrations were measured at the end of treatment, just before the last injection (baseline) and then 15 +/- 2 weeks (first control) after the last injection. In patients with GH levels below 2.5 micrograms/L and/or normal IGF-1 at the first control, a second control was performed four to eight weeks later.

RESULTS

After one year of treatment with octreotide LAR, the mean plasma GH concentration was 1.91 +/- 1.25 micrograms/L (mean +/- SE) and the mean IGF-1 concentration was 440 +/- 251 micrograms/L. Among the 18 patients, 13 had mean plasma GH concentrations below 2.5 micrograms/L and seven could be considered as well-controlled (normal IGF1 and mean GH levels below 2.5 micrograms/L). After treatment withdrawal, the plasma GH concentration remained below 2.5 micrograms/L at the first and the second controls in 2 of the 13 (15%) patients with suppressed GH levels on baseline. Among the seven well-controlled patients on baseline (GH levels below 2.5 micrograms/L and normal IGF-1), one (15%) remained well-controlled, one (15%) kept GH levels below 2.5 micrograms/L but increased IGF-1 levels, and one (15%) kept normal IGF-1 levels but increased mean GH levels at the first control. This hormonal status remained unchanged at the second control in these 3 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show long-lasting suppression of GH secretion after treatment withdrawal in some acromegalic patients treated for 12 months with octreotide LAR. The duration of GH suppression after treatment withdrawal is variable. Mean GH levels remained below 2.5 micrograms/L in 15% of our patients for up to 21 weeks following withdrawal of octreotide LAR. In practice, it may be preferable to wait several months after long-acting somatostatin analog withdrawal before reassessing hormone status. Owing this long-lasting effect, a dose reduction to 10 mg and/or a longer interval between injections could be considered for very good responders, as this would lead to considerable cost savings without affecting GH or IGF-1 control.

Long-acting octreotide LAR compared with lanreotide SR in the treatment of acromegaly

The use of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of acromegaly is now well established. Recently long-acting preparations of octreotide and lanreotide have been introduced. In this study we have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the long acting somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR in patients with acromegaly, and compared it with lanreotide SR. Five patients with active acromegaly were recruited; they were treated with lanreotide SR for 6 months and then, following a wash-out period, received octreotide LAR for 6 months. They were assessed at baseline, 3- and 6-months, by clinical score, GH and IGF1. Adverse effects were carefully monitored. Both treatments effectively reduced GH and IGF1 levels. Four of five patients achieved a mean GH level of < 2.5 ng/ml with both drugs; with octreotide LAR only, these patients also had GH < 1 ng/ml after oral glucose loading. The clinical symptoms score improved significantly with octreotide LAR, as did the ring size; the clinical score correlated significantly with GH. Blood glucose was not adversely affected. All patients experienced minor GI symptoms with lanreotide SR, but less frequently with octreotide LAR. Both drugs caused biliary stasis and had a tendency to form biliary sludge. Octreotide LAR proved effective for the treatment of acromegaly and was well tolerated. Octreotide LAR had some advantages over lanreotide SR, although the differences were not great.

Current management of acromegaly

Acromegaly, a chronic disease of growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion, is most typically caused by a pituitary adenoma. Early diagnosis is critical for prompt intervention to prevent deleterious effects of prolonged exposure to elevated GH and insulin-like growth factor Type I (IGF-I) levels. Current therapy for acromegaly includes several options: surgery, radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy remains a mainstay of therapy for acromegaly. Cure rates are high in microadenomas, but < 50% in macroadenomas. Conventional and stereotactic procedures for radiation therapy are also effective in decreasing GH levels in acromegalic patients, but they need years to normalise GH hypersecretion and carry with them the risk of hypopituitarism. The major classes of drugs currently used to treat acromegaly are dopamine agonists and analogues of somatostatin. Dopamine agonists bind to the D2 receptor and suppress GH hypersecretion in some patients with acromegaly. Their clinical effectiveness is modest, although promising results have been obtained with two novel compounds, quinagolide and cabergoline, that possess long duration of action. Somatostatin analogues have been shown to improve clinical symptoms of acromegaly, decrease hypersecretion of GH and IGF-I and reduce tumour volume in a clinically significant number of patients. Octreotide is administered by s.c. route several times a day, but the recently developed sustained release formulations (octreotide LAR and SR lanreotide) are administered only every 7-28 days by i.m. injections. The complications associated with somatostatin analogues are small, relative to the benefits. Lastly, compounds with a novel mechanism of action, the GH receptor antagonists, are presently under investigation.