Central venous access devices in haemophilia

Surgical procedures and complications in placement of totally implantable venous access port in pediatric hemophilia patients: A retrospective analysis

This retrospective study at Beijing Children's Hospital (2020-2023) analyzed surgical procedures and complications in 24 pediatric hemophilia patients undergoing Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) insertion, primarily in the right jugular vein (RJV). We detailed the surgical process, including patient demographics and intraoperative imaging use. The choice of the RJV for TIVAP placement was influenced by its larger diameter and superficial anatomical position, potentially reducing risks like thrombosis and infection. Our findings support the RJV as a safer alternative for port placement in pediatric patients, aligning with current literature. Statistical analysis revealed no significant correlation between complications and baseline characteristics like weight and diagnosis type. However, the length of hospital stay and implant brand were significant risk factors for catheter or port displacement and removal. The limited patient number may introduce bias, suggesting a need for further studies with larger samples. Despite a 14.7 %-33 % complication rate and 5 port removals, the advantages of TIVAP, including reliable venous access, reduced discomfort, and treatment convenience, were evident. Most complications improved with symptomatic treatment, and there were no deaths due to port-related complications, underscoring the impact of TIVAP on improving pediatric hemophilia treatment.

[Treatment of haemophilia in Austria]

This guideline is intended to provide practical guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of haemophilia in Austria. Few randomized controlled interventional trials are available addressing the treatment of haemophilia, therefore recommendations are usually based on low level of evidence and represent expert consensus.This guideline is based on the WFH guideline, published in 2020, and adapted according to the national circumstances and experience.It includes recommendations and suggestions for diagnosis and follow-up visits and pharmacological therapies for treatment and prophylaxis. Further topics comprise special aspects in children and adults with severe haemophilia, outcome measurement, and management of trauma, special bleedings and interventions, including dental procedures, inhibitors, management of haemophilia carriers, and psychosocial aspects.

Emicizumab prophylaxis in infants with hemophilia A (HAVEN 7): primary analysis of a phase 3b open-label trial

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous emicizumab enables prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A (HA) from birth, potentially reducing risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). HAVEN 7 (NCT04431726) is the first clinical trial of emicizumab dedicated to infants, designed to investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of emicizumab in those aged ≤12 months with severe HA without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. Participants in this phase 3b trial received emicizumab 3 mg/kg maintenance dose every 2 weeks for 52 weeks and are continuing emicizumab during the 7-year long-term follow-up. Efficacy end points included annualized bleed rate (ABR): treated, all, treated spontaneous, and treated joint bleeds. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), thromboembolic events (TEs), thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), and immunogenicity (anti-emicizumab antibodies [ADAs] and FVIII inhibitors). At primary analysis, 55 male participants had received emicizumab (median treatment duration: 100.3; range, 52-118 weeks). Median age at informed consent was 4.0 months (range, 9 days to 11 months 30 days). Model-based ABR for treated bleeds was 0.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.63), with 54.5% of participants (n = 30) having zero treated bleeds. No ICH occurred. All 42 treated bleeds in 25 participants (45.5%) were traumatic. Nine participants (16.4%) had ≥1 emicizumab-related AE (all grade 1 injection-site reactions). No AE led to treatment changes. No deaths, TEs, or TMAs occurred. No participant tested positive for ADAs. Two participants were confirmed positive for FVIII inhibitors. This primary analysis of HAVEN 7 indicates that emicizumab is efficacious and well tolerated in infants with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors.

A post hoc analysis of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A who developed inhibitors in the PUPs A-LONG trial

ABSTRACT

Inhibitor development is a major therapeutic complication for people with hemophilia. The phase 3 PUPs A-LONG study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, herein referred to as rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A. Male PUPs <6 years old were enrolled and received rFVIIIFc; inhibitor development was the primary end point. Post hoc analyses, including patient treatment regimen patterns and timing of inhibitor development, descriptive and Kaplan-Meier analyses of time to first inhibitor-positive test by treatment regimen and by titer, and consumption, were performed to describe patients who developed inhibitors during PUPs A-LONG. We investigated patient characteristics (eg, demographics and genotype) and nongenetic risk factors (eg, intense factor exposure and central venous access device [CVAD] placement) that may predict inhibitor development and characteristics of inhibitor development (low-titer vs high-titer inhibitor). Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed for age, race, and ethnicity across both patients who were inhibitor-positive and those who were inhibitor-negative (all P > .05). High-risk F8 variants were associated with development of high-titer inhibitors (P = .028). High-titer inhibitor development was often preceded by the presence of a low-titer inhibitor. Patients whose low-titer inhibitor progressed to a high-titer inhibitor received a higher mean dose per infusion (98.4 IU/kg, n = 5) compared with those whose low-titer inhibitor resolved spontaneously (59.2 IU/kg, n = 7; P = .033) or persisted (45.0 IU/kg, n = 5; P = .047). There was no association between CVAD placement surgery and inhibitor development. Post hoc analyses suggest that F8 genotype and dose of factor are as important as inhibitor risk factors and require further investigation. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02234323.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a subcutaneous recombinant FVIII (OCTA101) in adult patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Regular, prophylactic intravenous (i.v.) FVIII can be challenging for some patients with haemophilia A. Subcutaneous (s.c.) FVIII administration could provide an alternative treatment option with greater convenience and without the complications associated with venous access.

AIM

To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), bioavailability and efficacy of s.c. OCTA101, a recombinant FVIII with a recombinant von Willebrand factor fragment dimer.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective, open-label, phase I/II study (NCT04046848). Previously treated male patients (≥18 years) with severe haemophilia A were eligible for the study. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety (including immunogenicity) of OCTA101. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, bioavailability, and the efficacy of prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were treated with OCTA101. FVIII inhibitors developed in five (16.7%) patients during daily prophylaxis with 40-60 IU/kg (three cases) and 12.5 IU/kg (two cases) OCTA101. The trial was therefore terminated. OCTA101 had a 2.5-fold longer terminal half-life compared with i.v. rFVIII, and bioavailability was 16.6%. Efficacy data at study termination indicated that daily prophylaxis with 40-60 IU/kg OCTA101 was efficacious in the absence of FVIII inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite promising PK and efficacy results, the trial was terminated due to the incidence of FVIII inhibitors. The occurrence of inhibitors at two dose levels suggests that their development may be related to the subcutaneous route of administration.

Between Scylla and Charybdis: thrombosis in children with hemophilia

Thromboembolism is an infrequent complication in children with hemophilia that has been traditionally associated with the presence of a central venous access device. Novel rebalancing agents have shown promising results as prophylactic therapies to minimize the risk of bleeding but both thromboembolism and thrombotic microangiopathy have been reported as complications. The management of thrombosis in children with hemophilia is particularly challenging given the inherent risk of bleeding. In this paper, we present clinical vignettes to review the literature, highlight challenges, and describe our approach to managing thromboembolism in children with hemophilia.

Central venous access devices implantation in children with severe hemophilia a: data from the children comprehensive care center of China

Objectives

To report the perioperative management experience of central venous access devices (CVAD) in Chinese children with severe hemophilia A (SHA) in China.

Methods

This retrospective study included SHA children who underwent Port-A-Cath or peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) implantation between 2020/01 and 2021/07. Collected data included baseline characteristics, factor replacement regimen and CVAD-related complications.

Results

Nine patients had nine ports placed, and eight patients underwent 10 PICCs placement. Patients without or with low-titer inhibitor (<5 BU) received a port. The median preoperative and postoperative plasma-derived factor VIII (pd-FVIII) doses were 53.0 (44.4-61.1) and 315.9 (88.2-577.8) IU/kg. The median port duration was 189 (15-512) days, with infection incidence of 0.06 per 1000 CVAD days. Patients with high-titer inhibitors (>10 BU) received PICC. The median recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) dose was 87.47 μg/kg before and for 5-7 doses after implantation over 2-3 days. The median PICC duration was 226.5 days, with infection incidence of 0.12 per 1000 catheter-days.

Conclusions

CVADs can be safely implanted in China. PICC implantation is a practical and safe option for SHA children with high-titer inhibitors.

IDEAL study: A real-world assessment of pattern of use and clinical outcomes with recombinant coagulation factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) in patients with haemophilia B in Italy

INTRODUCTION

Factor IX replacement therapy is used for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in haemophilia B. rIX-FP is an extended half-life albumin-fusion protein, which, in clinical studies, has demonstrated prolonged dosing intervals up to 21 days for routine prophylaxis, providing therapeutic benefit.

AIMS

To describe dosing frequency and consumption (primary endpoint), efficacy and safety of rIX-FP treatment during routine clinical practice in Italy.

METHODS

Patients with moderate/severe haemophilia B on prophylaxis with rIX-FP for ≥6 months, were enrolled in this observational study from October 2017 to February 2019 and followed-up for 2 years. Descriptive analysis included prospective and retrospective data (12 months prior to switching to rIX-FP).

RESULTS

Data were collected from 59 male patients (median age 30.1 years) enrolled by 23 Italian centres. Of them, 50 were on prophylaxis during the entire observation period and completed the study. The infusion frequency changed from 2-3 times/week in 86.0% of patients with previous treatment, to less than once a week in 84.0% of patients treated with rIX-FP at the 2nd-year follow-up. The annual number of infusions decreased by about 70%, whereas the mean FIX activity trough level increased from 3.8% to 14.4% (mean > 10% in all the infusion regimens). Median Annualised Bleeding Rate of .0 was achieved across all prophylaxis regimens. Subjects with zero bleedings increased from 66.0% to 78.0% with rIX-FP.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with rIX-FP reduced infusion frequency, while providing higher FIX trough levels with substantial benefit in terms of annualised bleeding rate and a good safety profile.

Thromboembolic Disease in Haemophilic Patients Undergoing Major Orthopaedic Surgery: Is Thromboprophylaxis Mandatory?

Haemophilia is a rare genetic disorder, that results from various degrees of deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (haemophilia A), or factor IX (haemophilia B), with an X-linked transmission. The patients affected are in the majority of cases males (who inherit the affected X-chromosome from the maternal side), with rare cases of females with haemophilia (FVIII or FIX < 40 IU/dL), situations in which both X-chromosomes are affected, or one is affected, and the other one is inactive (known as carrier). The hypocoagulable state due to the deficiency of clotting factors, manifests as an excessive, recurrent tendency to bleeding, which positively correlates with plasmatic levels. Severe haemophilia results in hemarthrosis, although recent data have shown that moderate or even mild disease can lead to joint bleeding. Recurrent episodes of haemorrhages, usually affecting large joints such as knees, elbows, or ankles, lead to joint remodelling and subsequent haemophilic arthropathy, which may require arthroplasty as a last therapeutic option. Orthopaedic patients have the highest risk among all for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) with morbid and potentially fatal consequences. While for the rest of the population thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery is efficient, relatively safe, and widely used, for patients with haemophilia who are considered to have a low thromboembolic risk, there is great controversy. The great heterogeneity of this particular population, and the lack of clinical trials, with only case reports or observational studies, makes thromboprophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery a tool to be used by every clinician based on experience and case particularities. This review aims to briefly summarise the latest clinical data and to offer an insight into the current recommendations that readers would find useful in daily practice.

Utility of Blood Cultures and Empiric Antibiotics in Febrile Pediatric Hemophilia Patients With Central Venous Access Devices

BACKGROUND

Children with hemophilia frequently require long-term central venous access devices (CVADs) for regular infusion of factor products. Hemophilia patients are not immunocompromised, but the presence and use of CVADs are associated with infections including bacteremia. Currently, the utility of blood cultures in evaluation of the febrile hemophilia patient with an indwelling CVAD is unknown, nor is optimal empiric antibiotic use.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of febrile immunocompetent hemophilia patients with CVADs presenting to a large academic urban pediatric emergency department from 1995 to 2017. We used a natural language processing electronic search, followed by manual chart review to construct the cohort. We analyzed rate of pathogen recovery from cultures of blood in subgroups of hemophilia patients, the pathogen profile, and the reported pathogen susceptibilities to ceftriaxone.

RESULTS

Natural language processing electronic search identified 181 visits for fever among hemophilia patients with indwelling CVADs of which 147 cases from 44 unique patients met study criteria. Cultures of blood were positive in 56 (38%) of 147 patients (95% confidence interval, 30%-47%). Seventeen different organisms were isolated (10 pathogens and 7 possible pathogens) with Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species as the most common. Thirty-four percent of isolates were reported as susceptible to ceftriaxone. Positive blood cultures were more common in cases involving patients with inhibitors (n = 71) versus those without (n = 76), odds ratio, 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-15.9). This was observed irrespective of hemophilia type.

CONCLUSIONS

Febrile immunocompetent hemophilia patients with indwelling CVADs have high rates of bacteremia. Empiric antimicrobial therapy should be targeted to anticipated pathogens and take into consideration local susceptibility patterns for Staphylococcus aureus.

Estimating the risk of thrombotic events in people with congenital hemophilia A using US claims data

Aim: Compare thrombotic risk in people with congenital hemophilia A (PwcHA) to the general non-hemophilia A (HA) population. Patients & methods: US claims databases were analyzed to identify PwcHA. Incidence rates of myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis and device-related thrombosis were compared with a matched cohort without HA. Results: Over 3490 PwcHA were identified and 16,380 individuals matched. PwcHA had a similar incidence of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism compared with the non-HA population, but a slightly higher incidence of ischemic stroke and deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of device-related thrombosis was significantly higher in PwcHA. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that PwcHA are not protected against thrombosis, and provides context to evaluate thrombotic risk of HA treatments.

Emicizumab prophylaxis: Prospective longitudinal real-world follow-up and monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on prophylaxis of severe haemophilia A (HA) patients treated by emicizumab are scarce.

AIM

To study the efficacy and safety of longitudinal emicizumab prophylaxis and assess laboratory monitoring correlations in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

HA patients with and without FVIII inhibitors, initiating emicizumab prophylaxis, were prospectively enrolled. Bleeding, adverse events and surgeries were documented. FVIII inhibitors, emicizumab levels and thrombin generation (TG) were sequentially measured.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients, including 58 children (whose median (IQR) age was 6 (1-11) years) with severe HA, composed the study cohort. Twenty-nine per cent (31/107) of our HA patients had FVIII inhibitors. Patients were followed for a median of 67 weeks (up to 144 weeks). Fifty-three patients, whose median follow-up was 53 weeks, experienced zero bleeds. Most bleeds (94%) among children were trauma-related, whereas 61% of adults sustained spontaneous joint bleeds. Four patients experienced major bleeds, with a fatal outcome in one infant, who also presented with central venous line thrombosis. No other serious adverse events were encountered. Seven patients have decided to stop emicizumab treatment for various reasons. Emicizumab plasma levels increased after emicizumab prophylaxis initiation, and values were maintained during follow-up, in all but one patient, suspected of anti-drug antibodies. A significant reduction of FVIII inhibitor levels was noted among inhibitor patients. TG was increased and sustained yet could not prognosticate bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab prophylaxis was mostly well tolerated, although 50% of patients experienced breakthrough bleeds. Routine TG monitoring is not obligatory, and further studies are warranted in selected patient populations.

The changing treatment landscape in haemophilia: from standard half-life clotting factor concentrates to gene editing

Congenital haemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) and B (factor IX deficiency) are X-linked bleeding disorders. Replacement therapy has been the cornerstone of the management of haemophilia, aiming to reduce the mortality and morbidity of chronic crippling arthropathy. Frequent intravenous injections are burdensome and costly for patients, consequently with poor adherence and restricted access to therapy for many patients worldwide. Bioengineered clotting factors with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles can reduce the burden of treatment. However, replacement therapy is associated with a risk for inhibitor development that adversely affects bleeding prevention and outcomes. Novel molecules that are subcutaneously delivered provide effective prophylaxis in the presence or absence of inhibitors, either substituting for the procoagulant function of clotting factors (eg, emicizumab) or targeting the natural inhibitors of coagulation (ie, antithrombin, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, or activated protein C). The ultimate goal of haemophilia treatment would be a phenotypical cure achievable with gene therapy, currently under late phase clinical investigation.

Implantable venous access devices in children with severe hemophilia: a tertiary pediatric institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Clotting factor replacement forms the pillar of treatment for children with hemophilia. Most children can be treated using peripheral venipuncture, but very young children and children with poor venous access might require a central venous catheter. Short-term and long-term complications of implantable venous access device placement (also known as port placement) can result in important morbidity and mortality in children with hemophilia.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with port placement in children and adolescents with severe hemophilia (<1% of the Factors VIII or IX).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review over a 10-year period to identify port placement in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia. We reviewed demographic and procedural information, access frequency, mechanical complications, and central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). Eighteen males were included, with median age at insertion of 3.9 years (0.7-22.7 years). Fifteen of the 18 patients had hemophilia Type A and 3/18 had Type B. Thirteen had high neutralizing inhibitor titers.

RESULTS

Technical success in port placement was achieved in 26/27 (96.3%) patients, with 1 port failure caused by venous occlusion from prior catheter placement. Port catheter size ranged from 5 French (Fr) to 7.5 Fr. All were single-lumen and placed via right (76.9%) or left (23.1%) internal jugular vein; 59.3% were placed during general anesthesia, and all had factor replacement prophylaxis. A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was placed concurrently in 69.2% of the cases; per hospital policy, the port was only accessed 15 days post-placement to reduce the risk of site hematoma. Two patients were lost to follow-up. The total catheter days was 15,893. Ports were removed in 14/24 cases, most commonly because of CLABSI (7/24; 29.2%) and transition to peripheral infusion (3/24; 12.5%). Bleeding was the most common complication in the first 30 days after placement. There were nine CLABSI events (0.57 per 1,000 catheter days), all in patients with high neutralizing inhibitor titers. A higher frequency of port access (more or equal to daily vs. less than daily) correlated with higher infection rates (P=0.02). Median time from port insertion to first infection was 348 days (range 167-1,055 days). There were four fibrin-sheath-related catheter occlusions (0.25 per 1,000 catheter days): three catheters were salvaged with intra-catheter tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) instillation resulting in a salvage of an additional 1,214 catheter days, and one catheter was removed after tPA failure (0.06 per 1,000 catheter days).

CONCLUSION

Port maintenance in boys with severe hemophilia is challenging given the need for long-term frequent device access that is associated with catheter-related infections. The rate of bleeding or infection did not differ in patients whether the device was accessed immediately or 15 days post placement. With appropriate pre- and post-procedural factor replacement, immediate and early term severe complications are not common.

Prophylaxis for hemophilia A without inhibitors: treatment options and considerations

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder traditionally managed with standard half-life (SHL) factor (F) VIII concentrates. Extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products and emicizumab-kywh, a nonfactor therapy, are newer treatment options. Additional nonfactor agents and gene therapy are expected to reach the market in the near future.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed (MEDLINE) search from 1962 to April 2020 related to hemophilia A, its management, and the products currently available for prophylaxis was performed to comprehensively review these topics and analyze the benefits and drawbacks of each therapeutic.

EXPERT OPINION

Prophylaxis with SHL FVIII concentrates remains the standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia A and may also be considered for selected individuals with moderate disease. Several years of real-world experience with EHL FVIII, emicizumab-kywh, and other agents in development will be necessary to determine their ultimate roles in the prevention of bleeding and its complications. Gene therapy may not provide a permanent cure for hemophilia A.

A multicenter, open-label phase 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with inhibitors

Emicizumab, a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody, bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and FX to restore the function of missing activated FVIII in hemophilia A. Emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors was investigated in a phase 3 trial (HAVEN 2). Participants, previously receiving episodic/prophylactic bypassing agents (BPAs), were treated with subcutaneous emicizumab: 1.5 mg/kg weekly (group A), 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (group B), or 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (group C). Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy (including an intraindividual comparison of participants from a noninterventional study) were evaluated. Eighty-five participants aged <12 years were enrolled. In group A (n = 65), the annualized rate of treated bleeding events (ABRs) was 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.50), and 77% had no treated bleeding events. Intraindividual comparison of 15 participants who previously took BPA prophylaxis showed that emicizumab prophylaxis reduced the ABR by 99% (95% CI, 97.4-99.4). In groups B (n = 10) and C (n = 10), ABRs were 0.2 (95% CI, 0.03-1.72) and 2.2 (95% CI, 0.69-6.81), respectively. The most frequent adverse events were nasopharyngitis and injection-site reactions; no thrombotic events occurred. Two of 88 participants developed antidrug antibodies (ADAs) with neutralizing potential, that is, associated with decreased emicizumab plasma concentrations: 1 experienced loss of efficacy, and, in the other, ADAs disappeared over time without intervention or breakthrough bleeding. All other participants achieved effective emicizumab plasma concentrations, regardless of the treatment regimen. Emicizumab prophylaxis has been shown to be a highly effective novel medication for children with hemophilia A and inhibitors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02795767.

Inpatient Health Care Utilization in Children With Hemophilia Before and After the Joint Outcome Study Publication

The "Joint Outcomes Study" (JOS) demonstrated improved joint outcomes for patients receiving primary prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy. The impact of primary prophylaxis on inpatient health care utilization is not well-defined. To evaluate changes in hospitalization care of children with hemophilia before and after the 2007 JOS publication, this study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) to evaluate admissions for patients with hemophilia A or B (age, 2 to 7) admitted between January 2002 and 2006 (pre-JOS) and January 2010 and 2014 (post-JOS). Discharge diagnosis codes and clinical transaction classifications were used to differentiate bleeding episodes, infections, bypass agent use, length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) management. Overall, admissions for bleeding episodes did not change (26.5% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 23.6% post-JOS, P=0.10). However, admissions for suspected infections increased (3.0% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 7.2% post-JOS, P<0.01) while confirmed infections remained stable. Meanwhile, ICU utilization decreased (7.8% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 4.9% post-JOS, P<0.01). The necessity for ICU care in children with hemophilia has decreased since publication of the JOS. However, expanded adoption of primary prophylaxis is associated with more hospitalizations for suspected systemic infections, likely due to utilization of central venous catheters to deliver clotting factor concentrates.

Emicizumab: Review of the literature and critical appraisal

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab-kywh (ACE910) is a recombinant, humanized, asymmetric bispecific antibody that functions to bring activated FIX (FIXa) and zymogen FX into an appropriate steric conformation to medicate the activation of FX to FXa thereby mimicking the cofactor function of FVIIIa.

AIM

The objective of this manuscript was to review the development and potential role for emicizumab in the treatment of patients with haemophilia A with and without inhibitors.

METHODS

A Cochrane Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) search focusing on emicizumab in haemophilia was conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 37 citations were retrieved and serve as the database for the literature reviewed herein. Once-weekly subcutaneous injection of emicizumab at three dose levels has been shown to be effective as prophylaxis to prevent bleeding in a majority haemophilia A patients with inhibitors to FVIII. Likewise, prevention of bleeding was also observed in more than two thirds of patients without inhibitors to FVIII. One antidrug antibody to emicizumab has been reported in over 600 treated patients, two have developed thromboembolic events and three thrombotic microangiopathy. These thrombotic complications have occurred in conjunction with FVIII-bypassing agents, and none have been observed following recommendations from the manufacturer regarding concomitant use of bypassing agents. The median annual treated bleeding rates were decreased in patients with as well as those without an inhibitor to FVIII.

CONCLUSION

The principal advantage of emicizumab is subcutaneous administration and effectiveness irrespective of the presence of inhibitors. Emicizumab could conceivably represent a new epoch in the treatment of people with haemophilia A.

Optimizing bleed prevention throughout the lifespan: Womb to Tomb

The focus of care providers, patients and families is the ability to tailor care for persons with haemophilia (PWH) across the lifespan. Care requires knowledge of the bleeding disorder and age-related complications, risk of therapeutic interventions, and evaluation of individual characteristics that contribute to outcomes. The ultimate goal is to live a normal life without the burden of bleeding, for PWH and carriers. A wide range of therapeutic options is required to achieve personalized care. Over the last decade, substantial therapeutic advantages have been achieved in the treatment of haemophilia that include the development of a robust array of factor concentrates, novel haemostatic agents, and increased knowledge and awareness of disease associated outcomes and risk factors. Significant strides on the road to accessible gene therapy have been realized. This increased range of therapeutic modalities provides options for development and implementation of care plans for each patient at each stage of life that are more flexible compared to prior care regimens. Paradigms for management of haemophilia are changing. As a community, we must work together to use these resources wisely, to learn from outcomes with new therapies and diagnostic tools, to assure all patients can achieve improved care and outcomes regardless of disease state or country of origin.

Preclinical pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of subcutaneously administered glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (N8-GP) and development of a human pharmacokinetic prediction model

Essentials N8-GP is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A. Subcutaneous (SC) FVIII dosing might reduce the treatment burden of prophylaxis. SC N8-GP has a favorable PK profile in animal models and disappears from skin injection sites. Combined animal (SC) and clinical (IV) data suggest that daily SC dosing may provide prophylaxis.

SUMMARY

Background N8-GP is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) for the treatment of hemophilia A. Subcutaneous administration of FVIII may reduce the treatment burden of prophylaxis; however, standard FVIII products have low bioavailability after subcutaneous dosing in animals. Objective To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, effectiveness and local distribution of subcutaneously administered N8-GP in preclinical models and predict the human pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Methods The pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered N8-GP were evaluated in FVIII knockout (F8-KO) mice and cynomolgus monkeys; a human PK prediction model in hemophilia A patients was developed. The hemostatic effect was evaluated in a tail vein bleeding model in F8-KO mice. The injection-site distribution and absorption of subcutaneously administered N8-GP were assessed in F8-KO mice by the use of temporal fluorescence imaging and immunohistochemistry. Results Subcutaneously administered N8-GP had a bioavailability, a first-order absorption rate and a half-life, respectively, of 24%, 0.094 h-1 and 14 h in F8-KO mice, and 26%, 0.33 h-1 and 15 h in cynomolgus monkeys. A dose-dependent effect of subcutaneously administered N8-GP on blood loss was observed in mice. A minimal amount of N8-GP was detected at the injection site 48-72 h after single or multiple dose(s) in F8-KO mice. Subcutaneously administered N8-GP was localized to the skin around the injection site, with time-dependent disappearance from the depot. PK modeling predicted that subcutaneously administered N8-GP at a daily dose of 12.5 IU kg-1 will provide FVIII trough levels of 2.5-10% in 95% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Conclusions Subcutaneously administered N8-GP may provide effective hemophilia A prophylaxis. A phase I clinical trial is underway to investigate this possibility.

Arteriovenous shunts as venous access in children with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Venous access is essential in patients with haemophilia for administration of factor concentrates. Peripheral venipuncture may be challenging, particularly in young children or during immune tolerance induction (ITI). Central venous access devices (CVADs) carry a significant risk for complications. An alternative for venous access is peripheral arteriovenous shunts (AVSs), but there is sparse documentation in the literature. The aim of this study was to document our experience with AVS over 12 years in 27 boys with severe haemophilia.

METHODS

For AVS creation, a subcutaneous vein is connected end-to-side with an artery at the wrist (Cimino) or at the forearm (Gracz shunt). Factor concentrates were substituted as for intermediate size surgery. To prevent shunt occlusion, heparin (5 units/kg/h) was given during the first 3 days.

RESULTS

Indications for AVS creation were prophylaxis start (n = 20) and ITI (n = 7). Age at shunt insertion was median 1.5 years (minimum 8 months; maximum 11.7 years). Shunt maturation was achieved within a median of 3 weeks after surgery (1.5 weeks; 18 weeks). Age when home treatment was established was median 2.1 years (9 months; 11.7 years). Four patients required AVS revisions due to stenosis, but 26 of 27 patients (96%) achieved good long-term shunt function. There were few other complications.

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous shunts provide a good alternative to CVAD and carry a lower risk of complications. AVSs allow earlier start of prophylaxis and home therapy with an improved quality of life for patients and families.

Novel therapies and current clinical progress in hemophilia A

The evolution of hemophilia treatment and care is a fascinating one but has been fraught with many challenges at every turn. Over the last 50 years or so patients with hemophilia and providers have witnessed great advances in the treatment of this disease. With these advances, there has been a dramatic decrease in the mortality and morbidity associated with hemophilia. Even with the remarkable advancements in treatment, however, new and old challenges continue to plague the hemophilia community. The cost of factor replacement and the frequency of infusions, especially in patients with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis, remains a significant challenge for this population. Other challenges include obtaining reliable venous access, especially in younger patients, and the development of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). The development of extended half-life products, a bispecific antibody which mimics the coagulation function of factor VIII (FVIII) and inhibition of anticoagulation proteins such as antithrombin with antibodies, aptamers or RNA interference technology have offered novel therapeutic approaches to overcome some of these existing challenges. Additionally, ongoing gene therapy research offers a way to possibly cure hemophilia. These novel treatment tools in conjunction with the establishment of an increasing number of comprehensive hemophilia centers and worldwide advocacy efforts have continued to push the progress of hemophilia care to new frontiers. This review highlights and summarizes these novel therapeutic approaches and the current clinical progress of hemophilia A.

Hemophilia Care in the Pediatric Age

Hemophilia is the most common of the severe bleeding disorders and if not properly managed since early infancy can lead to chronic disease and lifelong disabilities. However, it enjoys the most efficacious and safe treatment among the most prevalent monogenic disorders. Hemophilia should be considered in the neonatal period in the case of unusual bleeding or in the case of positive family history. Later, hemophilia should be suspected mainly in males because of abnormal bruising/bleeding or unusual bleeding following invasive procedures-for example, tonsillectomy or circumcision. Prophylactic treatment that is started early with clotting-factor concentrates has been shown to prevent hemophilic arthropathy and is, therefore, the gold standard of care for hemophilia A and B in most countries with adequate resources. Central venous access catheters and arterovenous fistulas play an important role in the management of hemophilia children requiring repeated and/or urgent administration of coagulation factor concentrates. During childhood and adolescence, personalized treatment strategies that suit the patient and his lifestyle are essential to ensure optimal outcomes. Physical activity is important and can contribute to better coordination, endurance, flexibility and strength. The present article focuses also on questions frequently posed to pediatric hematologists like vaccinations, day-care/school access and dental care.

New findings on inhibitor development: from registries to clinical studies

The high incidence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in patients with haemophilia A has encouraged debate as to whether product-type plays a role. There is debate in the literature as to whether rFVIII concentrates are associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors compared to pdFVIII products. The management of haemophilia in patients with inhibitors includes on-demand/prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents, and/or immune tolerance induction (ITI). However, these options create an economic and emotional burden on patients, their families and healthcare practitioners. Although ITI eliminates inhibitors successfully in 60-80% of cases, it is costly. Despite high costs, preliminary data from a decision analytical model have indicated that ITI is economically advantageous compared with on-demand/prophylactic treatment with bypassing agents. In patients with persistent inhibitors and those who are not candidates for ITI or have failed ITI, bleeding-related mortality and morbidity increase and quality of life decreases, compared with non-inhibitor patients. This article provides an update on the risk of inhibitor development and discusses best management approaches for patients with high-risk factors for inhibitor development.

Complications of haemophilia in babies (first two years of life): a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Universal Data Collection System

AIM

To describe the prevalence and complications in babies ≤2 years with haemophilia.

METHODS

We used a standardized collection tool to obtain consented data on eligible babies aged ≤2 years with haemophilia enrolled in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Universal Data Collection System surveillance project at US Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs).

RESULTS

Of 547 babies, 82% had haemophilia A, and 70% were diagnosed within one month of birth. Diagnosis was prompted by known maternal carrier status (40%), positive family history (23%), bleeding (35%) and unknown 2%; 81% bled during the first two years. The most common events were bleeding (circumcision, soft tissue, oral bleeding) and head injury. There were 46 episodes of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) in 37 babies (7%): 18 spontaneous, 14 delivery related, 11 traumatic, 2 procedure related and 1 unknown cause. Of the 176 central venous access devices (CVADs) in 148 (27%) babies, there were 137 ports, 22 surgically inserted central catheters and 20 peripherally inserted central catheters. Ports had the lowest complication rates. Inhibitors occurred in 109 (20%) babies who experienced higher rates of ICH (14% vs. 5%; P = 0.002), CVAD placement (61% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) and CVAD complications (44% vs. 26%; P < 0.001). The most common replacement therapy was recombinant clotting factor concentrates.

CONCLUSION

Bleeding events in haemophilic babies ≤2 years were common; no detectable difference in the rates of ICH by the mode of delivery was noted. Neonatal factor exposure did not affect the inhibitor rates. Minor head trauma, soft tissue and oropharyngeal bleeding were the leading indications for treatment.

Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients With Different Types of Central Lines

BACKGROUND

Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) patients. Understanding the differences in CLABSI rates by central line (CL) type is important to inform clinical decisions.

PROCEDURE

CLABSI, using similar definitions, noted with three commonly used CL types (totally implanted catheter [port], tunneled externalized catheter [TEC], peripherally inserted central catheter [PICC]) and CL-specific line days were prospectively tracked across 15 US PHO centers from May 2012 until April 2015 and CLABSI rates (CLABSI per 1,000 CL-specific line days) were calculated. Host and organism characterstics associated with the CLABSI events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Over the course of 2.8 million line days, 1,113 CLABSI events (397 in inpatients and 716 in ambulatory patients) were noted. The inpatient CLABSI rate was higher than the ambulatory CLABSI rate for each of the CL types: 1.48 versus 0.16 for ports, 3.51 versus 1.38 for TECs, and 3.07 versus 1.16 for PICCs, respectively. TECs and PICCs were associated with higher CLABSI rates than ports, inpatient and ambulatory.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that CLABSI rates were significantly higher for inpatients compared to ambulatory PHO patients for all CL types. Among ambulatory patients, TECs had the highest CLABSI rate and ports the lowest. Among inpatients, TECs and PICCs had higher CLABSI rates than ports but were not statistically different from one another. Cognizant that host and underlying disease attributes may contribute to these differences, these results can still inform CL choice in clinical practice.

Central venous access device (CVAD) complications in Haemophilia with inhibitors undergoing immune tolerance induction: Lessons from the international immune tolerance study

INTRODUCTION

Central venous access devices (CVADs) are frequently required as stable long-lasting venous access in children with haemophilia, especially those requiring immune tolerance induction (ITI) for inhibitors. CVAD infection is one of the most frequently reported catheter-related complications in this patient population.

AIM

Detailed review of CVAD complications from the International ITI (I-ITI) study and analysis of potential risk factors for such complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained data from the I-ITI study primarily focused on CVAD-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 115 children were recruited and 183 CVADs were placed in 99 subjects resulting in 121,206 CVAD-days observed on-study. A total of 124 CVAD infections were reported in 41 of 99 (41%) subjects with an overall infection rate of 0.94 per 1000 CVAD-days (interquartile ranges 0-1.7). A similar number of infections were observed in the two treatment arms (median: 2 and 3 in high dose and low dose respectively). Infections occurred more frequently in the presence of external catheters than with fully implanted catheters (P = 0.026). Infected patients were significantly younger at the time of CVAD insertion (median age: 22 vs. 25 months, P = 0.020). Patients with Gram-positive infections were also significantly younger than those with Gram-negative infections (median age: 17 vs. 25 months, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

CVAD infection was the most common complication observed in children with severe haemophilia and inhibitors in the frame of the I-ITI study. Younger age at CVAD insertion and external CVAD were associated with higher risk for infection. ITI outcome was unaffected by CVAD infections.

How I use bypassing therapy for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors

Inhibitor development poses a significant challenge in the management of hemophilia because once an inhibitor is present, bleeding episodes can no longer be treated with standard clotting factor replacement therapy. Consequently, patients with inhibitors are at increased risk for difficult-to-control bleeding and complications, particularly arthropathy and physical disability. Three clinical trials in patients with inhibitors have demonstrated that prophylaxis with a bypassing agent reduces joint and other types of bleeding and improves health-related quality of life compared with on-demand bypassing therapy. In hemophilia patients without inhibitors, the initiation of prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII or FIX prior to the onset of recurrent hemarthroses can prevent the development of joint disease. Whether this is also true for bypassing agent prophylaxis remains to be determined.

Current management of the hemophilic child: a demanding interlocutor. Quality of life and adequate cost-efficacy analysis

Hemophilias are the most known inherited bleeding disorders. The challenges in the management of hemophilic children are different from those in adults: prophylaxis regimen removed the hallmark of crippling disease with lifelong disabilities; individualized regimens are being implemented in order to overcome venous access problems. Presently, at least in high-income countries, advances in treatment of hemophilia resulted in continuous improvement of the patients' quality of life and life expectancy. Inhibitors remain the most severe complication of hemophilia therapy. The treatment' compliance is the key to achieve a successful management. The patient, his family, the medical and psychological team are the players of a comprehensive care system. The current management of hemophilic children is the example of huge resource investments enabling long-term benefits in particular quality of life as a primary objective of the healthcare process.

Prospective evaluation of venous access difficulty and a near-infrared vein visualizer at four French haemophilia treatment centres

Although a serious impediment in haemophilia patients, difficulty accessing peripheral veins has received little attention in clinical studies. New peripheral vein visualization devices could potentially ameliorate difficult venous access (DVA), but their utility remains unproved. The study aim was to survey the frequency, causes and clinical manifestations of DVA and evaluate the clinical utility of a near-infrared (NIR) vein visualizer. In this multicentre prospective study, methods, difficulties and outcomes of venous access were assessed for a single venipuncture in consecutive patients. The impact of an NIR vein visualizer on vein localization, the number of venipuncture attempts and patient stress and pain was determined. Among 450 total patients enrolled, venous access was judged to be difficult in 165 (36.7%), most often because of poor vein condition, young patient age, overweight and difficulty in finding veins. Of the patients with DVA, difficulty in locating veins was encountered in 82.4%, and more than one venipuncture attempt was required in 24.8%. Veins were difficult to locate in significantly fewer DVA patients (P = 0.002) when the NIR vein visualizer was used (76.0%) than not used (92.3%). Pain during venipuncture in DVA patients was also significantly less common (P = 0.019) with use of the NIR vein visualizer (34.0% vs. 55.4%). No effect was observed on venipuncture attempts. DVA affects more than one-third of patients at haemophilia treatment centres. An NIR vein visualizer showed significant promise for facilitating vein location and mitigating patient pain in those patients.

The role of Rixubis™ in the treatment of hemophilia B

Hemophilia B is an inherited coagulopathy caused by the partial or complete deficiency of factor (F) IX. Factor replacement therapy, involving the intravenous infusion of plasma-derived or recombinant (r) FIX concentrate, is the cornerstone of treatment, used to control and prevent bleeding episodes. Although several plasma-derived FIX products are available, until recently, only a single rFIX concentrate was on the market. The aim of this paper is to review the pharmacokinetics, hemostatic efficacy, and safety of Rixubis™ (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, CA, USA), a newly licensed rFIX product.

Factor VIII therapy for hemophilia A: current and future issues

Hemophilia A is a congenital, recessive, X-linked bleeding disorder that is managed with infusions of plasma-derived or recombinant factor (F) VIII. The primary considerations in FVIII replacement therapy today are the: 1) immunogenicity of FVIII concentrates, 2) role of longer-acting FVIII products, 3) prophylactic use of FVIII in children and adults with severe hemophilia A, and 4) affordability and availability of FVIII products. Improving patient outcomes by increasing the use of FVIII prophylaxis, preventing or eliminating FVIII inhibitors, and expanding access to FVIII concentrates in developing countries are the major challenges confronting clinicians who care for patients with hemophilia A.

Considerations in individualizing prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A

Prophylaxis is considered optimal care for children and adults with severe haemophilia A because of its proven ability to reduce joint and other bleeding episodes. However, a 'one size fits all' approach to prophylaxis is not ideal, potentially leading to over-treatment in some individuals and under-treatment in others. Moreover, a generic plan fails to take into account a patient's lifestyle and personal preferences. This article reviews the factors contributing to bleeding risk and joint damage and uses case studies to illustrate how these contributors can be weighed to individualize the prophylactic regimen, thereby increasing the likelihood of therapeutic success.

Central venous access devices in patients with hemophilia

Hemophilia is a hereditary disorder in which the major clinical manifestation is bleeding into the joints, muscles, internal organs and the CNS, often without any obvious trauma. Bleeding can be fatal as in the case of CNS hemorrhage, or severely debilitating following repeated bleeding into joints that results in crippling arthritis. Treatment for hemophilia includes the intravenous administration of clotting factor concentrates to replace the missing or defective protein. Venous access is therefore critical to the treatment of hemophilia and the prevention of complications due to bleeding. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately half of patients less than 16 years of age and one-third of all patients with hemophilia receive regular prophylactic injections of clotting factor concentrates. Prophylaxis, or the regular scheduled administration of antihemophilic factor concentrate, is effective in preventing bleeding. Among those patients with severe disease, in the absence of prophylaxis, approximately 13 bleeds, including nine joint hemorrhages, occur annually. In contrast, when prophylaxis is administered, the annual number of total and joint bleeds decreases to five and three, respectively. One of the major barriers to the more wide-spread use of prophylaxis is venous access. While peripheral venipuncture remains the first choice for venous access, central venous access devices are frequently used to facilitate repeated and/or urgent administration of clotting factor concentrates. The advantages of central venous access devices are well recognized in certain treatment regimens such as prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy, as well as certain patient groups such as young children in whom venipuncture is often difficult and traumatic, and adults with scarred veins. Central venous access devices also allow earlier commencement of both home treatment and prophylaxis. The goal of this review is to discuss the different types of central venous access devices and their role in the management of hemophilia to provide practitioners that care for patients with hemophilia with the necessary information to make sound therapeutic recommendations to their patients.

Renal diseases in haemophilic patients: pathogenesis and clinical management

Haemophilia A and B are genetic X-linked bleeding disorders, caused by mutations in genes encoding factors VIII and IX, respectively. Clinical manifestations of haemophilia are spontaneous haemorrhage or acute bleeding caused by minor trauma, resulting in severe functional consequences that can culminate in a debilitating arthropathy. Life expectancy and quality of life of patients with haemophilia have dramatically improved over the last years, mainly for new therapeutic options and the awareness to the risk of HCV and HIV infections. Different clinical problems arise from this important change in history of patients with haemophilia. In particular, ageing-related diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension and cancer, and chronic viral infections are emerging as new challenges in this patient population. Among the different types of chronic illnesses, renal diseases are of special interest as they involve some difficult management issues. In fact, decisions regarding adequate preventive strategies and viral infection treatment, the choice of the dialytic modality, placement of vascular access and prescription of dialytic treatments are particularly complicated, because only few data are available. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis of renal damage in patients with haemophilia, especially in those with blood-transmitted viral infections, and the major issues about the management of renal diseases, including problems related to dialytic treatment and kidney transplantation, providing practical algorithms to guide the clinical decision-making process.