Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Fusion Protein Linking Coagulation Factor IX with Albumin (rIX-FP) in Previously Untreated Patients with Hemophilia B

Introduction  Recombinant fusion protein linking coagulation factor IX (FIX) with albumin (rIX-FP) has been shown to be an effective, well-tolerated treatment for patients with severe hemophilia B who had previously received factor replacement therapy. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of rIX-FP in previously untreated patients (PUPs). Methods  Patients with moderately severe/severe hemophilia B (≤2% FIX) previously untreated with FIX replacement products received rIX-FP (25-75 IU/kg) prophylaxis weekly or on-demand treatment over ≥50 exposure days (EDs). Primary outcomes were the number of patients who developed FIX inhibitors and mean incremental recovery (IR) following a 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP. Secondary outcomes included incidence of adverse events (AEs) and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs). Results  In total, 12 PUPs with a median age of 0 years (range, 0-11 years) were treated with rIX-FP for a median of 50 EDs (6/12 prophylaxis; 6/12 on-demand then prophylaxis). Overall, 11/12 patients did not develop FIX inhibitors; one 11-year-old patient developed an inhibitor against FIX after 8 EDs and was ultimately withdrawn. Mean (standard deviation) IR was 1.2 (0.4, n  = 8) (IU/dL)/(IU/kg). Of the 137 treatment-emergent AEs recorded, five were attributed to rIX-FP. On the prophylaxis regimen, median ABR was 1.0 (range, 0-3.9, n  = 12). No thromboembolic events or deaths occurred during the study. Conclusion  This study provides data to support the safety and efficacy of rIX-FP in PUPs requiring on-demand or prophylactic treatment for moderately severe/severe hemophilia B, consistent with results in previously treated patients. Overall, 1/12 patients developed an inhibitor against FIX.

Design of a Real-World Observational Study in Previously Untreated and Minimally Treated Hemophilia A Patients: Protect-NOW

Background  The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of each of Octapharma's factor VIII (FVIII) products, Nuwiq, octanate, and wilate, have been investigated in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A in prospective clinical trials. The aim of the Protect-NOW study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and utilization patterns of Nuwiq, octanate, and wilate in PUPs and minimally treated patients (MTPs; <5 exposure days [EDs] to FVIII concentrates or other blood products containing FVIII) with severe hemophilia A in a real-world setting. Real-world data provide valuable information that complement data obtained from interventional clinical trials. Methods  Protect-NOW (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03695978; ISRCTN identifier: 11492145) is a real-world study in PUPs and MTPs treated with either the human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII Nuwiq (simoctocog alfa) or a plasma-derived FVIII concentrate containing von Willebrand factor (octanate or wilate). It is a prospective and (partly) retrospective, observational, international, noncontrolled, noninterventional study. A total of 140 PUPs and MTPs with severe hemophilia A will be enrolled across around 50 specialized centers worldwide and followed for either 100 EDs or a maximum period of 3 years from ED1. The primary objectives are to assess effectiveness in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes and overall safety, including inhibitor development. The secondary objectives are to assess utilization patterns (including dosage and frequency of administration) and the effectiveness in surgical prophylaxis. Conclusions  The Protect-NOW study will provide information on the treatment of PUPs and MTPs in routine clinical practice, which will help guide clinical decision making for treating these patients in the future.

Erratum: Effect of DDAVP on Platelet Activation and Platelet-Derived Microparticle Generation

Objectives  Initial treatment in patients with haemophilia remains challenging. The choice of therapy, timing, dose and frequency have been and are still under intense debate. New treatment options like novel factor concentrates and non-factor therapies broaden the discussion.

Design  The German Paediatric Haemophilia Research Database (GEPHARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study including children and adolescents with haemophilia A or B (FVIII or FIX levels <25 IU/dL) in a German treatment centre after January 1st, 2017. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in June 2021.

Results  249 children and adolescents from 22 participating centres in Germany were analysed in this cross-sectional analysis. 203 patients suffered from haemophilia A (PwHA) and 46 from haemophilia B (PwHB). The median age at diagnosis for Pw severe HA or HB was 6 or 2 months, the median age at analysis was 33 or 35 months for Pw severe HA or B, respectively. 117 Pw severe HA received treatment, including plasma derived concentrates (n = 43), standard recombinant concentrates (n = 23), extended half live concentrates (n = 33) and non-replacement therapies (n = 18). For Pw severe HB, plasma derived concentrates (n = 3), standard recombinant concentrates (n = 8) and extended half live concentrates (n = 14) were used. Current inhibitors were reported in 16 PwHA and 1 PwHB.

Conclusions  GEPHARD was successfully established as a national cohort for newly diagnosed PwH in Germany. Epidemiological and treatment data were presented. Longitudinal analyses of this growing cohort will allow to value treatment strategies and their outcome in the evolving treatment landscape.

A Cross-sectional Analysis of Treatment in PUPs in 2021 in Germany - First Data from the GEPHARD Study Group

OBJECTIVES

 Initial treatment in patients with haemophilia remains challenging. The choice of therapy, timing, dose and frequency have been and are still under intense debate. New treatment options like novel factor concentrates and non-factor therapies broaden the discussion.

DESIGN

 The German Paediatric Haemophilia Research Database (GEPHARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study including children and adolescents with haemophilia A or B (FVIII or FIX levels <25 IU/dL) in a German treatment centre after January 1st, 2017. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in June 2021.

RESULTS

 249 children and adolescents from 22 participating centres in Germany were analysed in this cross-sectional analysis. 203 patients suffered from haemophilia A (PwHA) and 46 from haemophilia B (PwHB). The median age at diagnosis for Pw severe HA or HB was 6 or 2 months, the median age at analysis was 33 or 35 months for Pw severe HA or B, respectively. 117 Pw severe HA received treatment, including plasma derived concentrates (n = 43), standard recombinant concentrates (n = 23), extended half live concentrates (n = 33) and non-replacement therapies (n = 18). For Pw severe HB, plasma derived concentrates (n = 3), standard recombinant concentrates (n = 8) and extended half live concentrates (n = 14) were used. Current inhibitors were reported in 16 PwHA and 1 PwHB.

CONCLUSIONS

 GEPHARD was successfully established as a national cohort for newly diagnosed PwH in Germany. Epidemiological and treatment data were presented. Longitudinal analyses of this growing cohort will allow to value treatment strategies and their outcome in the evolving treatment landscape.

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) in hemophilia B: First report on safety and efficacy in previously untreated and minimally treated patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

We report the first analysis of an extended half-life recombinant factor IX, nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP), in previously untreated patients (PUPs) and minimally treated patients with hemophilia B.

METHODS

Paradigm 6 (Safety and Efficacy of Nonacog Beta Pegol [N9-GP] in Previously Untreated Patients With Haemophilia B) is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial. Main inclusion criteria were males aged < 6 years, with hemophilia B with factor IX (FIX) activity ≤ 2%, who were previously untreated or with ≤ 3 exposure days (EDs) to FIX-containing products. Patients received N9-GP 40 IU/kg once weekly (prophylaxis) or individualized dosing (preprophylaxis). Bleeds were treated with N9-GP 40 IU/kg (80 IU/kg if severe). The primary end point was incidence of anti-FIX inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors). Secondary end points included safety outcomes and annualized bleeding rate (ABR).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (August 31, 2018), 38 patients had been screened, and 37 had received N9-GP (median age, 1.0 years [range, 0-4]). Total in-trial EDs amounted to 2833, representing ~ 65 patient-years. Two (6.1%) of 33 "at-risk" patients (patients with ≥ 10 EDs plus patients who developed inhibitors) developed high-titer inhibitors and were withdrawn. No other safety concerns, including thromboembolic events, were identified. In the prophylaxis group (n = 28), 67.9% were bleed free; all bleeds (n = 15) were treated with one N9-GP injection; and overall, spontaneous, and traumatic ABRs were low (median ABRs of 0.0, 0.0, and 0.0, respectively; modeled mean ABRs of 0.31, 0.08, and 0.23, respectively). Estimated mean FIX trough activity was 15.0%.

CONCLUSION

We report an inhibitor incidence of 6.1%, which is within the expected range for PUPs with hemophilia B. No other safety concerns were identified; moreover, N9-GP provided effective hemostatic coverage.

Inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia: A comparison of included patients and outcomes between a clinical study and a registry-based study

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a disease registry could serve as a suitable alternative to clinical studies to investigate safety of orphan drugs in children.

Methods

We used individual patient data from previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A from the factor VIII (rAHF‐PFM)‐clinical study and the PedNet registry. The primary outcome was the patient characteristics at entry and the difference in inhibitor development between the clinical study and the registry‐based study at 50 exposure days.

Results

Clinical study patients more often had a positive family history of inhibitors (31% vs 10%) and a high‐risk F8 genotype (82% vs 63%). In the clinical study 41/55 (75%) and in the registry‐based study 162/168 (96%) patients reached 50 exposure days. Inhibitors developed in 16 of the 41 patients in the clinical study (39%) vs 44 of the 162 patients in the registry‐based study (27%); seven patients (7%) vs 28 patients (17%) had high‐titre inhibitors. The risk of developing an inhibitor during the first 50 exposure days was similar (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.56‐1.94), when adjusted for family history of inhibitors, F8 gene mutation and intensive treatment at first exposure.

Conclusion

In the registry‐based study, patient numbers and completeness of follow‐up were higher. The risk of developing an inhibitor to a single product was comparable. Although the sample size of this study was too small to conclude on differences in high‐ or low‐titre inhibitors, this suggests that a registry could serve as a more suitable source for evaluation of high‐titre inhibitors in the setting of factor VIII deficiency.

Safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa in the prevention and treatment of bleeds in previously untreated paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: Results from the guardian 4 multinational clinical trial

Introduction

Turoctocog alfa is a recombinant, B domain‐truncated factor VIII (FVIII) approved for patients with haemophilia A.

Aim

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A.

Methods

Guardian 4 was a multicentre, multinational, non‐randomized, open‐label phase 3 trial comprising a main and extension phase. The former concluded once ≥ 50 patients had received treatment for ≥ 50 exposure days (EDs) or developed inhibitors. Patients received turoctocog alfa intravenously for prevention and treatment of bleeds. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FVIII inhibitors (≥0.6 Bethesda Units) reported during the first 50 EDs.

Results

Of the 58 patients who completed the main phase, 25 (43.1%) patients developed inhibitors (detected within 6‐24 [mean: 14.2] EDs from treatment start). High‐risk mutations were identified in 60% of patients who developed inhibitors in the main phase and were a significant predictor of inhibitor development (P = .003). Of the 21 patients who started immune tolerance induction therapy, 85.7% completed treatment with a negative inhibitor test (note that data on the last 3 patients completing ITI are based on information collated from sites prior to the final database lock). Haemostatic response (including missing values as failure) was rated as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ for 86.1% of bleeds occurring during prophylaxis. The estimated mean annualized bleeding rate for patients on prophylaxis was 4.26 bleeds/patient/year (95% CI: 3.34 − 5.44).

Conclusions

Turoctocog alfa was effective at preventing and stopping bleeds and was well tolerated. Inhibitor development was within the expected range for this PUP population.

Impact of the Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers (SIPPET) study and its post hoc analyses on clinical practice in the United States: A survey of Haemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society members

INTRODUCTION

A recent randomized trial, the Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers (SIPPET), confirmed that exposure to recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products doubled the risk of inhibitor development compared to plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) in previously untreated (or minimally treated) patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A. SIPPET post hoc analyses showed that early exposure to rFVIII was more immunogenic and that rFVIII could harm low-risk PUPs with non-null mutations. Clinical implications of SIPPET findings for the haemophilia community were unclear.

AIM

Study the impact of the SIPPET study and its post hoc analyses on clinical practice for PUPs with severe haemophilia A in the United States.

METHODS

Members of the North American Hemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS) completed two online questionnaires related to SIPPET publications and PUP management (study period: 12/2016-8/2018).

RESULTS

Over 50% participated the study. Sixty per cent expressed methodological concerns about the SIPPET study, yet 55% shared the study with new families. During the study period, rFVIII selection fell from 43/61 (70%) to 15/54 (28%) while use of pdFVIII and shared decision-making increased from 5/61 (8%) to 9/54 (17%) and from 4/61 (7%) to 10/54 (19%), respectively. Based on post hoc analyses, 44/54 (82%) would change their clinical practice with 31/44 (70%) using pdFVIII for PUPs. Barriers to translation of SIPPET analyses included study design concerns, non-inclusion of novel therapies, inability to perform genetic testing at diagnosis and risk of plasma-derived infections.

CONCLUSION

Despite the methodological concerns about the SIPPET study, this Grade I evidence appears to have influenced the clinical practice of haemophilia providers in the United States.

Clinical experience with moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) in younger paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: Two open-label studies

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) have been demonstrated in haemophilia A patients aged ≥6 years.

AIM

These studies aimed to further describe moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) experience in paediatric patients (<12 years) with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1%).

METHODS

Two prospective, open-label studies enrolled patients aged <12 years: one study with 37 previously treated patients (PTPs) and another with 23 previously untreated patients (PUPs). All patients initially received 50 IU/kg of moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) to evaluate either recovery alone, or with other PK parameters (6 to <12 years) before continuing treatment for 100 exposure days (EDs) or 24 months.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean (±SD) recovery ranged between 1.32 ± 0.65 (PUPs aged <2 years) and 2.13 ± 0.82 (PTPs aged 6 to <12 years). The mean (±SD) half-life was 9.12 ± 1.94 hours in PTPs aged 6 to <12 years. No new safety signals were detected in either study, 2 transient lower titre inhibitors occurred in PTPs while 8 inhibitors (3 low and 5 high titre) were detected in PUPs. Most bleeding episodes resolved with one infusion (94% [893/954]). The annualised bleeding rate (ABR) in the PTP study was 27.5 and 4.2 for patients reporting an on-demand and routine prophylaxis regimen at baseline, respectively. In the PUP study, the overall ABR was 5.9.

CONCLUSION

Moroctocog alfa (AF-CC) had expected PK findings (lower recovery in young children compared with older children) along with being safe and efficacious in a population of young severe haemophilia A patients.

Clinical trials and registries in haemophilia: Opponents or collaborators? Comparison of PUP data derived from different data sources

INTRODUCTION

The "Guideline on the clinical investigation of recombinant and human plasma-derived factor VIII products" (ClinGL) provides the requirements for the performing of clinical trials (CTs) for marketing authorization in Europe. The number of eligible previously untreated patients (PUPs) for CTs might be difficult to meet because of the concurrent development of FVIII concentrates, and additional data sources must be explored.

AIM

The extent to which CTs and the PedNet registry met relevant parameters, identified in the ClinGL, as well as inhibitor incidences were investigated in patients from both sources.

METHODS

Anonymized data of eight CTs in 369 PUPs performed from 1987 to 2009 were compared with each other and with 632 PUPs (born 2000-2009) from PedNet.

RESULTS

Clinical trials in PUPs performed for marketing authorization were too heterogeneous in their investigated parameters; therefore, a comparison of single factor concentrates was not possible. Data collection in PedNet met relevant parameters required for PUPs in accordance with the ClinGL. The overall inhibitor incidences were comparable (CT = 30.9% vs PedNet = 30.6%) when only severe haemophilia A (HA) patients from both data sources were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously performed CTs in PUPs were divergent, which prevented a direct comparison of outcomes. However, this study demonstrated that data from CTs and carefully designed registries may complement each other in the establishing of sufficient safety information for single products to improve clinical insights and support regulatory decisions.

Low incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A treated with octanate® : Final report from a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Octanate^® is a human, plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with demonstrated haemostatic efficacy in previously treated patients with haemophilia A.

AIM

This prospective, open-label study aimed to assess the immunogenicity of octanate^® in previously untreated patients (PUPs).

METHODS

The study monitored development of FVIII inhibitors in 51 PUPs. Tolerability, viral safety, FVIII recovery and efficacy of octanate^® for the prevention and treatment of bleeds and in surgical procedures were also assessed.

RESULTS

Five (9.8%) of the 51 patients developed inhibitors during the study, 4 of which (7.8%) were high titre. Three inhibitor cases (5.9%) were considered clinically relevant; 2 were transient inhibitors that disappeared during regular octanate^® treatment without a change in dose or treatment frequency. Amongst 45 patients with FVIII:C <1% at baseline and who received ≥20 exposure days (EDs) or had <20 EDs but developed an inhibitor, inhibitor incidence was 11.1% (6.7% clinically relevant). All clinically relevant inhibitors developed within 20 EDs of on-demand treatment. No inhibitors developed in PUPs receiving prophylaxis. All patients who developed inhibitors had either intron 22 inversions or large deletions. Irrespective of the reason for administration, haemostatic efficacy was rated as "excellent" in 99.6% of all infusions (4700 of 4717 infusions), and no complications were reported in 23 surgical procedures. Mean incremental in vivo recovery was 2.0%/IU/kg (±0.7) and 1.9%/IU/kg (±0.5) for the first and second assessments, respectively. Tolerability was rated "very good" in 99.9% of infusions.

CONCLUSION

In PUPs with severe haemophilia A, octanate^® demonstrated haemostatic efficacy with a low rate of inhibitor development.

Incidence of low-titre factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A: meta-analysis of observational studies

INTRODUCTION

A few studies have been focused on low-titre inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A. Although several putative factors have been implicated in the development of these inhibitors, solid data are still lacking.

AIM

The aim of this study was to perform a proportion meta-analysis on the incidence of low-titre inhibitors in haemophilia A.

METHODS

We surveyed the PubMed database to identify studies on de novo development of low-titre inhibitors in haemophilia A patients. On the basis of these data, we carried out a proportion meta-analysis to summarize information on incidence and between-study variability. Furthermore, the following three covariates were assessed by meta-regression: (i) mild disease vs. severe haemophilia; (ii) status of previously untreated patient (PUP) as opposed to multi-transfused and (iii) type of factor VIII.

RESULTS

Our literature search on PubMed extracted 340 eligible articles. From these, we selected 33 patient cohorts that were included in our meta-analysis (19 cohorts for PUPs and 14 cohorts for multi-transfused or unselected patients). The pooled incidence of low-titre inhibitors was 10.3% (95%CI: 8.3-12.5%) for studies including PUPs and 5.8% (95%CI: 2.5-10.4%) for the other studies; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). Meta-regression of 31 patient cohorts found that mild disease and type of factor VIII were not associated with an increased incidence of low-titre inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed that PUPs show a higher incidence of low-titre inhibitors than the other patients. Furthermore, our data showed that mild haemophilia was not associated with an increased incidence of low-titre inhibitors.

New findings on inhibitor development: from registries to clinical studies

The high incidence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in patients with haemophilia A has encouraged debate as to whether product-type plays a role. There is debate in the literature as to whether rFVIII concentrates are associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors compared to pdFVIII products. The management of haemophilia in patients with inhibitors includes on-demand/prophylaxis treatment with bypassing agents, and/or immune tolerance induction (ITI). However, these options create an economic and emotional burden on patients, their families and healthcare practitioners. Although ITI eliminates inhibitors successfully in 60-80% of cases, it is costly. Despite high costs, preliminary data from a decision analytical model have indicated that ITI is economically advantageous compared with on-demand/prophylactic treatment with bypassing agents. In patients with persistent inhibitors and those who are not candidates for ITI or have failed ITI, bleeding-related mortality and morbidity increase and quality of life decreases, compared with non-inhibitor patients. This article provides an update on the risk of inhibitor development and discusses best management approaches for patients with high-risk factors for inhibitor development.

Plasma-derived versus recombinant factor concentrates in PUPs: a never ending debate?

Inhibitor development in haemophilia is a serious complication to treatment with factor concentrates. Since the advent of more pure products, especially developed using recombinant DNA technology, some studies have shown an increased incidence of inhibitors in previously untreated patients (PUPs) receiving recombinant products whereas plasma-derived concentrates sometimes have been claimed to have a protective role, probably due to the content of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In fact, experiments indicate that the VWF may block uptake of factor VIII into macrophages for further processing to the immune system. Also, a competition between VWF and inhibitor binding to the C2 domain of factor VIII has been suggested. Recently, large cohort and surveillance studies have created a vigorous debate about the role of product class for inhibitor development as results have been conflicting. The only randomised prospective study, the SIPPET study, was published in 2016, and substantiated previous reports claiming that plasma derived concentrates give less inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A, previously not exposed to factor VIII. The debate will continue.

The role of previously untreated patient studies in understanding the development of FVIII inhibitors

Development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII), the major complication of haemophilia A treatment today, is influenced by multiple factors. Genetic (F8 mutation, family history, ethnicity, polymorphisms in immune modulating genes) and non-genetic (intensive exposure to FVIII, presence of pro-inflammatory signals as might occur with large bleeds, infections, surgery, or other immune stimulants [e.g. vaccines]) risk factors as well as their complex inter-relationships contribute to the inhibitor risk profile of haemophilia patients, particularly in the previously untreated patient (PUP) population. Studies in PUPs have been fundamental to furthering the understanding of FVIII inhibitor development, as well as discovering previously unappreciated risk factors. The multi-factorial nature of inhibitor development makes it difficult to ascertain the contribution of FVIII products in inhibitor development through individual PUP studies. Sufficiently powered studies of large cohorts may overcome these limitations but interpretations should be conducted cautiously. Proper design and implementation of PUP safety studies will become even more important with the introduction of new molecules, such as extended half-life or human cell-line derived FVIII that propose reduced immunogenicity. Despite these difficulties, carefully performed clinical studies in PUPs may provide important insights into the natural history of the immune response to FVIII and may suggest targets for intervention to reduce immunogenicity.