Clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas: an adenocarcinoma with ductal phenotype

Long-Term Survival After Curative Resection of a Primary Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Report of a Case

Clear cell pancreatic carcinoma, as a primary lesion, represents a rare malignant entity with very few references. As for the incidence, the clinical characteristics and the prognosis are still to be defined. Here, we present the case of a 73-year-old female who presented with epigastric pain radiating to the back, anorexia, and dyspepsia. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a well-circumscribed, low-attenuating tumor with peripheral enhancement, arising from the upper border of the pancreatic head. There were no metastases or other primary tumors. Radical resection of the tumor was undertaken. Histopathology showed round-to-oval neoplastic cells with a well-defined cell membrane, prominent cell borders, abundant clear cytoplasm, and centrally located nuclei. The periodic acid-Schiff reaction was positive and a diagnosis of primary clear cell pancreatic carcinoma was made. No adjuvant treatment was given. She remained under regular follow-ups with abdominal and thoracic CT scans for seven years without evidence of recurrence of other primary tumors. She was deceased 87 months after tumor resection because of conditions unrelated to the disease. This is the first case to the best of our knowledge, of long-term survival after radical resection of a primary pancreatic clear cell carcinoma, suggesting surgery as a treatment option for this rare tumor and review of the relevant literature.

Metastatic clear cell sarcoma of the pancreas: An overview

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma that accounts for less than 1% of all cases and was originally reported in 1965. The incidence of CCS is estimated to be approximately 0.014/100000 depending on the surveillance, epidemiology and end results databases. CCS is a highly invasive type that mainly metastasizes to the lungs, followed by the bones and brain; however, pancreatic metastasis is relatively rare. It has a high probability of recurrence or metastasis and has a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate. Finally, even after recovery, it is fundamental to keep regular postoperative follow-up for CCS patients.

Primary Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Rare Case Report

Most pancreatic carcinoma is ductal adenocarcinoma. Primary pancreatic clear cell carcinomas composed almost entirely of clear tumor cells are very rare. We present a case of a 72-year-old man with a pancreatic mass, which was detected on abdominal computed tomography (CT). He had no symptoms and no abnormal findings on physical examination; however, he had a history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and hepatocellular carcinoma. He had received anti-viral treatment and radiofrequency ablation twice until 2 years prior. One year prior, follow-up contrast-enhanced abdominal CT revealed a newly developed pancreatic mass. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy was performed. An ill-defined white-to-tan firm solid mass was observed in the pancreas, approximately 4.3 cm in diameter. The tumor cells showed >95% clear cell features, with a large round to oval nuclei and abundant clear cytoplasms, and well-defined cell membranes. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 19, HNF-1β, MUC-1, and p53. We excluded the possibility of metastatic clear renal cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, malignant melanoma, and sarcoma because of the negativity for vimentin, chromogranin, synaptophysin, and HMB45. Consequently, he was diagnosed as having primary clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas and was treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Two months later, abdominal CT was suspicious for local recurrence at the resection margin. Additional adjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy was carried out 12 times. The patient is still alive after his third radiofrequency ablation for the newly-developed hepatic mass. Immunohistochemical staining for MUC-1 and HNF-1β, as well as histologic feature is very helpful for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic clear cell carcinoma with imaging methods for metastasis exclusion.

Primary Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review

Over the years, the world has witnessed many advances in diagnosing and treating multiple types of cancers. These breakthroughs have revolutionized the understanding of the molecular drive behind these neoplasms, leading to tangible therapeutic evolution and promising prognostic implications. However, pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal disease. With recent discoveries, modern medicine has been able to delineate histopathologic subtypes of pancreatic cancer in hopes of improved diagnosis and treatment to improve survival. A once vague entity, clear cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, in particular, has been better characterized on a histopathological and molecular level over the past two decades. With novel technological support, this disease has become less inconspicuous, and more researchers have reported its occurrence. Its diagnosis relies heavily on a mix of histological and immunohistochemical clues such as a clear cell cytoplasm and positivity for cytokeratins and other markers. However, new molecular markers, such as hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta, have been associated with this entity and may aid in further diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This review article aims to portray how the identification and description of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas have evolved over the past few decades and how this may impact future treatment strategies.

Recent Advances in Digestive Tract Tumors: Updates From the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization "Blue Book"

CONTEXT.—

The World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumors, 5th edition, was published in 2019 and shows several impactful changes as compared with the 4th edition published in 2010. Changes include a revised nomenclature of serrated lesions and revamping the classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma is heavily revised, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is split into 2 subtypes. New subtypes of colorectal carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma are described. Precursor lesions are emphasized with their own entries, and both dysplastic and invasive lesions are generally recommended to be graded using a 2-tier system. Hematolymphoid tumors, mesenchymal tumors, and genetic tumor syndromes each have their own sections in the 5th edition. New hematolymphoid lesions include monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma; duodenal-type follicular lymphoma; intestinal T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; and indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. This paper will provide an in-depth look at the changes in the 5th edition as compared with the 4th edition.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a comprehensive, in-depth update on the World Health Organization classification of digestive tumors, including changes to nomenclature, updated diagnostic criteria, and newly described entities.

DATA SOURCES.—

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, as well as the 4th edition.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The World Health Organization has made many key changes in its newest update on tumors of the digestive system. Pathologists should be aware of these changes and incorporate them into their practice as able or necessary.

Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the pancreas: Cytopathology review of a rare entity

Primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the pancreas (PSRCCP) is an extremely rare diagnosis that has not been extensively studied in literature. Primary and metastatic neoplasms to the pancreas may exhibit cytomorphological similarities to signet ring cells, posing diagnostic challenges. In this article, we review PSRCCP and provide a study of several primary pancreatic neoplasms that may mimic the appearance of PSRCCP upon cytopathology evaluation, shedding light on the existence of this dilemma, and helping cytopathologists in navigating similar scenarios in their practice.

Addition of analysis of KRAS mutation or immunohistochemistry with MUC1 and carcinoembryonic antigen improves the diagnostic performance of fine needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is a health problem because of high lethality, increasing incidence and the absence of an early diagnosis. Biopsy by fine needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound has allowed obtaining tissue for cytopathological analysis, but there are several problems with their interpretation. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the cytopathological analysis with the addition of either an immunohistochemical (IHC) panel or the KRAS mutation for the diagnosis of PAC.

METHODS

We evaluated 62 pancreatic lesions by fine needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound, applying an IHC panel with mucin (MUC)-1, MUC4, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and p53. All cases also had a KRAS mutation determination. Three cytopathologists blinded to clinical data and the KRAS status reviewed the cytology independently. We calculated diagnostic performances for the cytology alone, cytology+IHC and cytology+KRAS to show the best method to diagnose PAC.

RESULTS

From 62 samples, 50 (80.6%) were PAC and 12 benign lesions. The cytopathological analysis correctly interpreted 26 malignant and 12 non-neoplastic cases (sensitivity 52%, specificity 100% and diagnostic accuracy 61.3%). The KRAS mutation was present in 88% of PAC. The cytology+ KRAS mutation increased the sensitivity by 10% and the diagnostic accuracy by 8%. The sensitivity increased by 2% adding either MUC1 or CEA to the cytology, and the diagnostic accuracy by 10 or 18%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The addition of IHC either with CEA or MUC1 improved the diagnostic performance of the cytology alone to diagnose PAC. The cytology + IHC evaluation was superior to the cytology + KRAS mutation to diagnose PAC.

Two Cases of Rare Pancreatic Malignancies

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains one of the most lethal malignancies with little treatment advancements. Other less common pancreatic cancer histologies have different outcomes and disease course. In this article, we report two cases of rare pancreatic tumors.

Presentation: The first case is a 59-year old, who was undergoing surveillance of a known pancreatic cyst, which eventually enlarged. The mass was resected and pathology revealed undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells. The patient did not receive any adjuvant therapy and has had no recurrence. The second case is of a 60-year-old patient who presented with signs and symptoms of pancreatic insufficiency and was found to have clear cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. She received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection without complications.

Conclusion: Our article presents these rare malignancies, which had outcomes that are more encouraging than typical adenocarcinomas. Genomic sequencing can provide more insight into these tumors and potentially provide targets for therapy.

Primary clear cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a case report and literature update

Primary clear cell carcinoma of pancreas is extremely rare. We present a case of a 64-year-old male with a mass in the distal body and tail of the pancreas. He underwent a distal pancreatectomy. The histopathology of tumor cells showed features with abundant clear cytoplasm and prominent cell boundaries. Immunohistochemical analysis of neoplastic cells showed reactions to antibodies against cytokeratin-7 and showed no reactions to antibodies against hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β, carbonic anhydrase 9, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with a primary clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas. This is the first time we have encountered it. We report this rare case and update the current literature of this tumor.

Morphological heterogeneity in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas - Does it matter?

Morphological heterogeneity is a common finding in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity relates not only to the microscopic appearances of the tumour cell population, but pertains also to other essential aspects of the cancer, including the grade of differentiation, growth pattern and desmoplastic stroma. While the existence of considerable morphological variation is well known among pathologists, it is usually not fully appreciated by the wider community. Morphological heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer is only partially represented in the WHO classification, and current pathology guidelines do not recommend reporting on morphological variation other than the conventional variants of ductal adenocarcinoma. Although tumour heterogeneity is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of therapeutic response, morphological heterogeneity has been left unconsidered as a possible proxy for underlying aberrations - genomic or otherwise - that determine the effect of treatment. Various aspects of morphological heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are illustrated in this article and discussed along with the possible implications for patient management and research.

Case report: Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with unique clear cell phenotype

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas are very rare tumors characterized by intraductal tubulopapillary growth, ductal differentiation, scant intracellular mucin production and cellular dysplasia. Here, we report the first case of an intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with clear cell morphology. The tumor was detected during the diagnostic work-up of acute pancreatitis in a 43- year old female. Histological examination revealed a tumor with the typical architecture of an intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with tumor cells showing abundant clear cytoplasm and Di-PAS negativity. Immunohistochemistry revealed positivity for Pan-CK, CK7, CK8/18, MUC1, MUC6, carbonic anhydrase IX, CD10, EMA, β-catenin and e-cadherin. Sanger sequencing did not detect mutations for β-catenin, BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA and GNAS. Altogether, histology, immunohistochemical expression profile (MUC1+, MUC6+, MUC2-, MUC5AC-, thrypsin-, chymotrypsin-, CDX2-) and sequencing results led to the diagnosis of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm. However, the neoplasm consisted of cells showing abundant clear cytoplasm, a morphological pattern not being described so far in the current classification of pancreatic intraductal neoplasms. Potential differential diagnosis and the molecular basis of clear cell morphology are discussed. In conclusion, we consider this tumor as intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with unique clear cell phenotype. After surgery and without adjuvant therapy, the patient’s clinical course has been uneventful for over two years now.

Nanofluidic digital PCR for KRAS mutation detection and quantification in gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Concomitant quantification of multiple mutant KRAS (v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) alleles may provide information in addition to that provided by standard mutation-detection procedures. We assessed the feasibility of a nanofluidic digital PCR array platform to detect and quantify KRAS mutations simultaneously in clinically relevant samples.

METHODS

We assessed 2 groups of patients (colorectal and pancreatic disease): Group 1 consisted of 27 patients with colorectal carcinomas, 14 patients with adenomas, and 5 control individuals; group 2 consisted of 42 patients with pancreatic carcinoma, 4 with adenocarcinomas of the ampulla, and 6 with chronic pancreatitis). Digital PCR was performed with the Digital Array Chip (Fluidigm).

RESULTS

Nanofluidic digital PCR detected mutant alleles at 0.05% to 0.1%, depending on the variant analyzed. For the colorectal disease group, conventional PCR detected 9 (64%) of 14 adenomas that were positive for KRAS mutants, whereas digital PCR increased this number to 11 (79%) of 14. Sixteen (59%) of 27 carcinomas showed KRAS mutation with conventional PCR. Two additional cases were detected with digital PCR. In 5 cases (3 adenomas, 2 carcinomas), the total number of mutant alleles changed. For the pancreatic disease group, digital PCR increased the number of positive cases from 26 to 34 (81%) and identified ≥ 2 mutant alleles in 25 cases, compared with conventional PCR, which identified multiple KRAS mutant alleles in only 12 cases. A good correlation was observed between results obtained with tumor biopsies and those obtained with pancreatic juice.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital PCR provides a robust, quantitative measure of the proportion of KRAS mutant alleles in routinely obtained samples. It also allows a better classification of tumors, with potential clinical relevance.

Detection of KRAS gene mutations in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for improving pancreatic cancer diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses. Genetic analysis of these samples could increase the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a novel method for the detection of mutations in the KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma-2 virus) gene for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

EUS-FNABs were performed on 82 patients with pancreatic masses, including 54 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 28 of non-malignant pancreatic masses. The biopsies were histopathologically and cytopathologically evaluated, and the detection of KRAS gene mutations (codons 12 and 13) was performed through peptide nucleic acid-directed polymerase chain reaction clamping and DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

In the pancreatic cancer cases, 88.9% (48/54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 80.5-97.2%) had KRAS mutations, while 61.1% (33/54; 95% CI: 48.1-74.1%) were unequivocally diagnosed by histo/cytopathology. In the indeterminate patients (n=49; diagnosed by EUS-FNA as either insufficient material to make a diagnosis, no malignancy, or suspicion of malignancy), there were 10 cases of pancreatic cancer with low serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (<37 U/l) and 6 of these were KRAS mutations. The sensitivity of detection by KRAS mutations (76.2%) and the combination of KRAS mutations and serum CA19-9 (81%) were significantly higher than for serum CA19-9 alone (52.4%). A logistic regression model showed that the KRAS mutation was significant (odds ratio=5.830; CI: 1.531-22.199, P=0.01), but not serum CA19-9. In the non-malignant pancreatic masses (n=28), KRAS mutations were detected in nine precancerous lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our method for the detection of KRAS gene mutations may be useful to supplement histo/cytopathologic evaluations for pancreatic cancer, and is superior to serum CA19-9 in EUS-FNAB histo/cytopathology-indeterminate patients. Results warrant further verification in other patient populations.

Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its variants comprise between 80% and 90% of all tumors of the exocrine pancreas. Because of its silent course, late clinical manifestation, and rapid growth, it is considered a silent killer. Only 10% to 15% of cases are resectable and the 5-year survival rate remains lower than 5%. The differential diagnosis between PDAC and chronic pancreatitis is a challenge for pathologists. This article provides a guide for pathologic evaluation of PDAC specimens with the macroscopic and microscopic features of common PDAC and its variants and discusses the differential diagnosis and morphologic and immunophenotypical prognostic parameters.

The use of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a review of PAX-8, PAX-2, hKIM-1, RCCma, and CD10

The diagnosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma may be difficult in some cases, particularly in the small image-guided biopsies that are becoming more common. As targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma are now standard treatment, the recognition and diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma has become even more critical. Many adjunctive immunohistochemical markers of renal epithelial lineage such as CD10 and RCCma have been proposed as aids in the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but low specificities often limit their utility. More recently described markers (PAX-2, PAX-8, human kidney injury molecule-1, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-β, and carbonic anhydrase-IX) offer the potential for greater sensitivity and specificity in this diagnostic setting; however, knowledge of their expected staining in other neoplasms and tissues is critical for appropriate use. In this review, we discuss the most widely used immunohistochemical markers of renal lineage with an emphasis on their sensitivity and specificity for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Subsequently, we present a variety of organ-specific differential diagnostic scenarios in which metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma might be considered and we propose immunopanels for use in each situation.

Clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas--a case report and review of the literature

Most of the malignant neoplasms of the pancreas demonstrate features that are consistent with adenocarcinoma. According to the WHO classification, primary clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas is rare and it is classified as a "miscellaneous" carcinoma. In addition, there is not an adequate systematic overview that can demonstrate its true existence as a definable entity. We report here on an unusual case of primary pancreatic clear cell carcinoma, which is the first such reported case in Korea. A 66 year old woman presented with abdominal pain and significant weight loss over the previous three weeks. On the abdominal computed tomography (CT), we detected an abdominal mass involving the pancreas tail and liver, and clear cell carcinoma with rhabdoid feature was seen on the histologic evaluation. The tumor cells showed well defined cell membranes, clear cytoplasm and prominent cell boundaries. The immunohistochemical stains showed positive reactions to antibodies against pan-cytokeratin, cytokeratin 7, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). On the other hand, there was a negative reaction for cytokeratin 20, chromogranin, synaptophysin, smooth muscle actin and HMB-45. She was diagnosed with a primary pancreatic clear cell carcinoma with hepatic metastasis and she received palliative gemcitabine chemotherapy. The patient died one month later of pancreatic cancer progression.

Endocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: pathologic and genetic features

CONTEXT

Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) are diagnostically challenging tumors whose natural history is largely unknown. Histopathology allows the distinction of 2 categories: poorly differentiated high-grade carcinomas and well-differentiated neoplasms. The latter include more than 90% of PENs whose clinical behavior varies from indolent to malignant and cannot be predicted by their morphology.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and report on additional primary material about the clinicopathologic features, classification, staging, grading, and genetic features of PENs.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review of relevant articles indexed in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) and primary material from the authors' institution.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of PEN is generally easy, but unusual features may induce misdiagnosis. Immunohistochemistry solves the issue, provided that the possibility of a PEN has been considered. Morphology allows the distinction of poorly differentiated aggressive carcinomas from well-differentiated neoplasms. The World Health Organization classification criteria allow for the discernment of the latter into neoplasms and carcinomas with either benign or uncertain behavior. The recently proposed staging and grading systems hold great promise for permitting a stratification of carcinomas into clinically significant risk categories. To date, inactivation of the MEN1 gene remains the only ascertained genetic event involved in PEN genesis. It is inactivated in roughly one-third of PENs. The degree of genomic instability correlates with the aggressiveness of the neoplasm. Gene silencing by promoter methylation has been advocated, but a formal demonstration of the involvement of specific genes is still lacking. Expression profiling studies are furnishing valuable lists of mRNAs and noncoding RNAs that may advance further the research to discover novel markers and/or therapeutic targets.

Clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas: histopathologic features and a unique biomarker: hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta

Clear cell carcinoma as a variant of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas is not well recognized. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta as a transcription factor has been identified as a specific biomarker of clear cell tumor of the female genital tract. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas and its unique biomarker hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta. A total of 84 pancreatic adenocarcinomas were analyzed pathologically and with an immunohistochemical approach with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta antibody. The identified clear cell carcinomas were further studied by PAS, DPAS, and mucicarmine stains. Pathologic features and clinical follow-up were documented. Of them, 20 (24%) pancreatic adenocarcinomas were identified with clear cell features, including 12 clear cell carcinomas and 8 ductal adenocarcinomas with clear cell component (defined as less than 75% of tumor with clear cells). Cytologically, the clear cell carcinomas exhibited clear cytoplasm with centrally located, atypical nuclei. PAS, DPAS, and mucicarmine stains confirmed that the clear cytoplasm was not due to accumulation of glycogen or mucin. The results of immunostaining showed that hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta is overexpressed in all clear cell carcinomas and in the clear cell components of eight ductal carcinomas with clear cell features. In contrast, in usual ductal adenocarcinoma, hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta exhibited overall weak or focally moderate staining; only eight cases were strongly positive (15%) of which 38% were high grade and 63% were moderate grade. However, when included with the strong staining cases in mixed and clear cell carcinoma, this group regardless of morphology appeared to correlate with worse survival compared to the group with weak hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta staining across morphologies (P<0.01). Thus, clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas is not an uncommon variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta is a useful marker to identify these clear cell carcinomas, and its overexpression may aid in stratifying survival rate.

Solid type clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas: differential diagnosis of an unusual case and review of the literature

Pancreatic neoplasms have been reliably classified on the basis of their histopathology and immunophenotype. In this study, we report on a pancreatic tumor whose phenotype and genotype could not be assigned to any known tumor entity. The tumor was observed in the pancreatic head of a 54-year-old woman. It was found to be a solid infiltrating carcinoma with abundant clear cells. Apart from cytokeratin, the tumor cells expressed vimentin, S100, and MUC-1. DNA microarray analysis revealed a transcription profile clearly differing from that of normal pancreatic tissue and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Despite metastatic behavior, the tumor displayed a more favorable course than conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We suggest that this tumor be called solid type clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas.

Elevated serum heparanase-1 levels in patients with pancreatic carcinoma are associated with poor survival

BACKGROUND

It has previously been shown that heparanase-1 (HPR1), an endoglycosidase, is up-regulated in pancreatic carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to test whether serum HPR1 levels in pancreatic carcinoma patients are elevated, and whether higher serum HPR1 levels are associated with a shortened survival.

METHODS

Serum HPR1 levels in 40 healthy donors, 31 pancreatic carcinoma patients, and 11 patients treated with gemcitabine were measured by a novel enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay. HPR1 expression in tumors was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining. Patient overall survival time was determined according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and their difference was evaluated by the log-rank test. A P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean serum HPR1 activity in pancreatic carcinoma patients was 439+/-14 units/mL, compared with 190+/-4 units/mL in the control serum samples from healthy donors. Serum HPR1 levels were significantly higher in patients with HPR1-positive tumors (660+/-62 units/mL) compared with those with HPR1-negative tumors (241+/-14 units/mL). The mean survival of 19 pancreatic carcinoma patients with serum HPR1 activity>300 units/mL was 7.9+/-0.2 months, whereas the mean survival of 12 patients with serum HPR1 activity<300 units/mL was 13.3+/-0.6 months. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the patient survival curve followed by log-rank test revealed that patients in the high serum HPR1 group had a significantly shorter survival compared with those in the low serum HPR1 group. Mean serum HPR1 activity decreased by 64% in 11 pancreatic carcinoma patients after 2 weeks of treatment with gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HPR1 activity in pancreatic carcinoma patients was found to be significantly elevated, in particular in those with HPR1-positive tumors. Increased serum HPR1 activity was associated with a shorter survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma patients.

Lipid-Rich Variant of Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms

Most pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) show characteristic and well-recognized endocrine morphology; however, a lipid-rich pattern, which can present a diagnostic problem in biopsies, has been reported, mostly as individual cases. Some have been included in descriptions of the rare clear-cell variant associated with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome. The histogenesis, clinicopathologic characteristics, and significance of this lipid-rich pattern have not been unraveled. In this study, 11 PENs exhibiting foamy, microvesicular cytoplasm were analyzed. In some cases, the nuclei were distorted by the vesicles, and the usual endocrine chromatin pattern was not evident. The growth pattern was relatively diffuse, with vague compartmentalization of the cells by a delicate vasculature; prominent nesting was noted in only 4 cases. Pathology reports indicated substantial diagnostic challenge in these cases; on biopsies, 1 case was originally diagnosed as adrenal cortical carcinoma, another as renal cell carcinoma, a third as solid-pseudopapillary tumor, and a fourth had a fine needle aspiration cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. All cases were chromogranin and synaptophysin positive. Electron microscopy in 3 cases confirmed the cytoplasmic vesicles to be lipid vacuoles. Neurosecretory granules were also evident. Clinically, as in conventional PENs, there appeared to be two distinct subsets: Two cases were familial or functional/syndromic (1 with VHL and the other with MEN-1 and glucagonoma syndrome) and occurred in younger adults (ages 41 and 47 years); the majority (n = 9) were nonfunctional/nonsyndromic and nonfamilial. The latter group was mostly represented by elderly males (mean age: 65 vs. 58 years in conventional sporadic PENs). Immunohistochemically, markers implicated in VHL-associated neoplasia, including HIF-1alpha, inhibin, and Melan-A (in clear-cell PENs) and MUC6 (in serous cystadenomas) were mostly negative in lipid-rich PENs (1 of 10, 1 of 10, 0 of 10 and 0 of 10, respectively). In conclusion, the lipid-rich pattern, reminiscent of adrenal cortical cells, represents a distinct subset of PENs. It presents a diagnostic challenge for surgical pathologists, especially in biopsies. EM supports the name lipid-rich for this variant. The findings suggest that the pathogenesis of lipid-rich tumors may be different from the VHL-associated clear-cell variants of PENs.

Clear cell carcinoma of exocrine pancreas: a rare tumor with an unusual presentation

Metastatic clear cell carcinomas are relatively common from primary tumors arising in the kidney, female genital tract, adrenal cortex, and lung, but they rarely occur from primary tumors of the pancreas. We report a case of metastatic pancreatic tumor with marked clear cell changes in a 46-year-old white man presenting with a pseudocyst of the pancreas. At laparotomy, there was a hard area in the head of the pancreas and another hard nodule was present in the omentum. The histologic and immunohistochemical test of the excised omental nodule exhibited features consistent with clear cell carcinoma from pancreatic primary. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a metastatic clear cell pancreatic tumor with such an unusual presentation.

The pathology of ductal-type pancreatic carcinomas and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: insights for clinicians

The phenotypic classification of pancreatic neoplasms is based on their cellular lineage. Thus, tumors with a ductal, acinar, and endocrine phenotype can be distinguished. Most pancreatic neoplasms show a ductal phenotype and can be classified as ductal adenocarcinomas. Less common tumors with a ductal phenotype are the variants of ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (including colloid carcinoma), mucinous cystic neoplasm, medullary carcinoma, and other rare tumors. Ductal adenocarcinomas most likely develop from ductal proliferative lesions arising in the pancreatic duct system. A recently adopted classification system for these lesions distinguishes between three grades of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). Molecular studies have revealed that PanIN-2 and PanIN-3 lesions represent a distinct step toward invasive carcinoma.

Clear Cell Ductal Adenocarcinoma of Pancreas: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

We present a unique carcinoma of the pancreas with predominantly clear cell morphology (&gt;95% clear cells). Mucicarmine stain revealed abundant intraluminal and intracytoplasmic mucin. Immunohistochemically, the cells were positive for the epithelial markers cytokeratin 7 and CAM 5.2, and were focally positive for cytokeratin 20. These cells also expressed monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen. Stains for the neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin were negative, as were stains for vimentin, p53, HMB-45, and CD10. An additional outstanding feature was the presence of dense intraluminal and intracytoplasmic hyaline globules, which were immunohistochemically positive for α1-antitrypsin. Sequencing of the K-ras oncogene revealed a point mutation in codon 12, providing molecular evidence of ductal origin. In the proper morphologic context supported by immunohistochemistry, clear cell carcinoma can be regarded as a rare variant of ductal adenocarcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas in surgical pathology material

BACKGROUND

Clear cell carcinomas of the pancreas are rare and more likely represent metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

Twenty-one cases of metastatic RCC to the pancreas were retrieved from the files of the Endocrine Registry of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Histologic features were reviewed, special stains and immunohistochemical studies were performed, and patient follow-up data were obtained.

RESULTS

The patients included 9 women and 12 men ages 47-76 years (mean, 64.4 years). Patients experienced weight loss, abdominal pain, or a mass lesion. The tumors occurred anywhere within the pancreas. The mean size of the tumors was 4.0 cm. Histologically, the tumors were comprised of clear cells with a rich vascular network. The RCC was diagnosed before (n = 17 patients; ages up to 32.7 years) or after (n = 4 patients; ages up to 13.2 years) the pancreatic metastases were discovered. Surgery was used in all patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in 4 patients. From the date of the diagnosis of pancreatic metastasis, 13 patients were dead with disseminated disease (DD) (mean, 4.5 years), and 8 patients were without disease (mean, 9.0 years). From the date of the diagnosis of primary RCC, 13 patients were DD (mean, 12.7 years), and 8 patients were without disease (mean, 24.7 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Although histochemical and immunohistochemical studies may help in the distinction between patients with primary versus metastatic clear cell tumors of the pancreas, clinical confirmation should be obtained. Surgical resection of the pancreatic metastatic disease is suggested, because the patient may still have a prolonged survival.