The frequency and severity of retinopathy are related to HbA1c values after, but not at, the diagnosis of NIDDM

Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review

AIMS

To systematically review the literature on the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and macular oedema (MO).

METHODS

A search of the bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL) was conducted up to October 2001. Selected relevant studies were scrutinized and included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 359 studies were included. The studies were reported in nearly 100 different journals and in over 50 countries. The majority of the studies were US-based, with large studies such as the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy dominating the literature. The studies were quite dated and highly heterogeneous in nature in terms of patient selection with variable inclusion criteria (age range, gender, diabetes duration and type, ethnicity, comorbidity, and DR status, assessment, and classification).

CONCLUSIONS

There are inconsistencies between epidemiological studies, and differences in study methods may contribute to conflicting reports of prevalence and incidence of DR and MO in diabetic populations. As new therapies for DR and its associated complications emerge, the need to capture and monitor new epidemiological data becomes increasingly important to be able to assess the impact and effectiveness of these therapies. Robust, longitudinal capture of patient data is, therefore, essential to evaluate the impact of current practice on the epidemiology of diabetic eye complications.

Glycohemoglobin: A Primary Predictor of the Development or Reversal of Complications of Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major health problem worldwide with long-term micro- and macrovascular complications responsible for a majority of its morbidity and mortality. The development and progression of these complications relate strongly to glycemic control.

Methods: We reviewed the literature extensively for studies that relate glycemic control to the development and progression of diabetic complications. We discuss the problems of standardizing glycohemoglobin measurements for monitoring diabetic therapy and also consider recently developed electrospray ionization mass spectrometry methods that have been considered as candidate reference methods for estimation of glycohemoglobin.

Results: Several clinical trials and studies have clearly shown that improved glycemic control is strongly associated with decreased development and/or progression of complications in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Irrespective of the methods used for estimating glycohemoglobin, these results underline the importance of glycohemoglobin for guiding therapy of diabetes mellitus. Recently developed candidate reference methods promise to yield greatly improved standardization for the measurement of glycohemoglobin.

Conclusions: Glycohemoglobin measurement remains the optimal indicator of glycemic control in diabetic patients, but translation of findings from clinical trials to clinical practice worldwide demands consistent values across all assays. To ensure that the important prognostic information still applies to all diabetic patients with the application of the reference method(s), the hemoglobin A1c values reported in the major clinical trials will have to be translated into statistically and computationally compatible values based on the new reference system(s).

A longitudinal analysis of salivary flow in control subjects and older adults with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Many diabetics complain of xerostomia, a condition that can affect oral health, nutritional status, and diet selection. This study's purposes were (1) to investigate the effect on salivary flow of type 2 diabetes and change in glycemic control in a group of older adults over time and (2) to compare flow rates with subjective complaints of xerostomia.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 39 older adults, 24 with type 2 diabetes and 15 who were nondiabetic (controls), aged 54-90 years, participated in a 1-year follow-up study. Diabetic status was determined by means of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and 2-hour glucose tolerance tests. Poor glycemic control was defined as HbA1c > 9%. Unstimulated whole, unstimulated parotid, and stimulated parotid saliva flow rates were measured for all subjects by a single examiner at baseline and 1 year later. Each subject completed a standardized xerostomia questionnaire at every visit.

RESULTS

Age, sex, and duration of diabetes did not adversely affect salivary flow rates. Subjects with poorly controlled diabetes had significantly lower stimulated parotid saliva flow rates at both visits. There were no significant changes in flow rates over time on the basis of diabetic status or glycemic control. Subjects with diabetes reported significantly more complaints of thirst but not of xerostomia at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that older adults with poorly controlled diabetes may have impaired salivary flow in comparison with subjects with better controlled diabetes and nondiabetic subjects, yet they may not have concomitant xerostomic complaints. There were no significant changes in salivary flow rates or glycemic control over the 1-year period.