Chronic neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor stimulation suppresses reproduction in virgin female and lactating rats

Mood, Food, and Fertility: Adaptations of the Maternal Brain

Successfully rearing young places multiple demands on the mammalian female. These are met by a wide array of alterations in maternal physiology and behavior that are coordinated with the needs of the developing young, and include adaptations in neuroendocrine systems not directly involved in maternal behavior or lactation. In this article, attenuations in the behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to stressors, the alterations in metabolic pathways facilitating both increased food intake and conservation of energy, and the changes in fertility that occur postpartum are described. The mechanisms underlying these processes as well as the factors that contribute to them and the relative contributions of these stimuli at different times postpartum are also reviewed. The induction and maintenance of the adaptations observed in the postpartum maternal brain are dependent on mother-young interaction and, in most cases, on suckling stimulation and its consequences for the hormonal profile of the mother. The peptide hormone prolactin acting on receptors within the brain makes a major contribution to changes in metabolic pathways, suppression of fertility and the attenuation of the neuroendocrine response to stress during lactation. Oxytocin is also released, both into the circulation and in some hypothalamic nuclei, in response to suckling stimulation and this hormone has been implicated in the decrease in anxiety behavior seen in the early postpartum period. The relative importance of these hormones changes across lactation and it is becoming increasingly clear that many of the adaptations to motherhood reviewed here reflect the outcome of multiple influences. © 2016 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 6:1493-1518, 2016.

Neuropeptide Y directly inhibits neuronal activity in a subpopulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-1 neurons via Y1 receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a member of the pancreatic polypeptide family, is an orexigenic hormone. GnRH-1 neurons express NPY receptors. This suggests a direct link between metabolic function and reproduction. However, the effect of NPY on GnRH-1 cells has been variable, dependent on metabolic and reproductive status of the animal. This study circumvents these issues by examining the role of NPY on GnRH-1 neuronal activity in an explant model that is based on the extra-central nervous system origin of GnRH-1 neurons. These prenatal GnRH-1 neurons express many receptors found in GnRH-1 neurons in the brain and use similar transduction pathways. In addition, these GnRH-1 cells exhibit spontaneous and ligand-induced oscillations in intracellular calcium as well as pulsatile calcium-controlled GnRH-1 release. Single-cell PCR determined that prenatal GnRH-1 neurons express the G protein-coupled Y1 receptor (Y1R). To address the influence of NPY on GnRH-1 neuronal activity, calcium imaging was used to monitor individual and population dynamics. NPY treatment, mimicked with Y1R agonist, significantly decreased the number of calcium peaks per minute in GnRH-1 neurons and was prevented by a Y1R antagonist. Pertussis toxin blocked the effect of NPY on GnRH-1 neuronal activity, indicating the coupling of Y1R to inhibitory G protein. The NPY-induced inhibition was independent of the adenylate cyclase pathway but mediated by the activation of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels. These results indicate that at an early developmental stage, GnRH-1 neuronal activity can be directly inhibited by NPY via its Y1R.

Neuropeptide signaling in the integration of metabolism and reproduction

Fertility is gated by nutrition and the availability of stored energy reserves, but the cellular and molecular mechanisms that link energy stores and reproduction are not well understood. Neuropeptides including galanin-like peptide (GALP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), products of the proopiomelanocortin (POMC; e.g., alpha-MSH and beta-endorphin), and kisspeptin are thought to be involved in this process for several reasons. First, the neurons that express these neuropeptides all reside in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, a critical site for the regulation of both metabolism and reproduction. Second, these neuropeptides are all targets for regulation by metabolic hormones, such as leptin and insulin. And third, these neuropeptides have either direct or indirect effects on feeding and metabolism, as well as on the secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). As the target for the action of metabolic hormones and sex steroids, these neuropeptides serve as molecular motifs integrating the control of metabolism and reproduction.

Limits to sustained energy intake IX: a review of hypotheses

Several lines of evidence indicate that animals in the wild may be limited in their maximal rates of energy intake by their intrinsic physiology rather than food availability. Understanding the limits to sustained energy intake is important because this defines an envelope within which animals must trade-off competing activities. In the first part of this review, we consider the initial ideas that propelled this area and experimental evidence connected with them. An early conceptual advance in this field was the idea that energy intake could be centrally limited by aspects of the digestive process, or peripherally limited at the sites of energy utilisation. A model system that has been widely employed to explore these ideas is lactation in small rodents. Initial studies in the late 1980s indicated that energy intake might be centrally limited, but work by Hammond and colleagues in the 1990s suggested that it was more likely that the limits were imposed by capacity of the mammary glands, and other works tended to support this view. This consensus, however, was undermined by studies that showed milk production was higher in mice at low temperatures, suggesting that the capacity of the mammary gland is not a limiting factor. In the second part of the review we consider some additional hypotheses that might explain these conflicting data. These include the heat dissipation limits hypothesis, the seasonal investment hypothesis and the saturated neural control hypothesis. Current evidence with respect to these hypotheses is also reviewed. The limited evidence presently available does not unambiguously support any one of them.

GPR54 and puberty

At puberty, pulsatile secretion of hormones initiates sexual maturation of the gonads. The G-protein-coupled receptor GPR54 is crucially involved in the initiation of puberty, along with its ligand metastin. Mice lacking GPR54 fail to undergo puberty and have immature reproductive organs and low levels of sex steroids and gonadotrophic hormones, but have normal levels of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in the hypothalamus. In humans, several cases of hypogonadism have been ascribed to mutations in GPR54. Production of metastin and, to a lesser extent, GPR54 are negatively regulated by testosterone and oestrogen, and injecting GPR54 ligands can increase hormone secretion in rodents. Thus, GPR54 is required for normal functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, probably at the level of gonadotrophin-releasing-hormone secretion.

Effects of peptide YY(3-36) on PRL secretion: pituitary and extra-pituitary actions in the rat

Polypeptide YY(3-36) (PYY(3-36)) is a gastrointestinal secreted molecule, agonist of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor subtypes Y2 and Y5, that has been recently involved as anorexigenic signal in the network controlling food intake. Notably, several factors primarily involved in food intake control and energy homeostasis (as leptin, orexins, ghrelin and NPY) have been linked also to the regulation of anterior pituitary hormone secretion and carry out pleiotropic effects upon the reproductive axis. However, whether similar actions are conducted by PYY(3-36) remains so far largely unexplored. Present studies were undertaken to analyze the potential effects of PYY(3-36) in the control of prolactin (PRL) secretion in the rat. To this end, responses to PYY(3-36) in terms of PRL secretion were monitored in vitro, after pituitary exposure to 10(-8) to 10(-6) M concentrations, and in vivo, after i.p. administration of different doses of PYY(3-36) (3, 10 and 30 microg/kg) to prepubertal male and female rats. In addition, the in vivo effects of PYY(3-36) were tested after central (i.c.v.) administration of 3 nmol of the peptide to prepubertal rats, and in hyperprolactinaemic aged females. PYY(3-36) stimulated, in a dose-dependent manner, in vitro PRL secretion by pituitaries from prepubertal male and female rats. In contrast, systemic administration of PYY(3-36) failed to modify serum PRL levels, whereas central infusion of PYY(3-36) significantly inhibited PRL secretion in prepubertal rats. Finally, PRL secretion was stimulated in aged hyperprolactinaemic female rats by systemic administration of PYY(3-36). In conclusion, the anorexigenic peptide PYY(3-36) may participate in the control of PRL secretion in the prepubertal rat, acting at pituitary (stimulatory effect) and extra-pituitary (likely inhibitory action at the hypothalamus) sites of the lactotrope axis. Moreover, net actions of PYY(3-36) on PRL secretion may depend on the age and prevailing PRL levels.

Energy balance and reproduction

The physiological mechanisms that control energy balance are reciprocally linked to those that control reproduction, and together, these mechanisms optimize reproductive success under fluctuating metabolic conditions. Thus, it is difficult to understand the physiology of energy balance without understanding its link to reproductive success. The metabolic sensory stimuli, hormonal mediators and modulators, and central neuropeptides that control reproduction also influence energy balance. In general, those that increase ingestive behavior inhibit reproductive processes, with a few exceptions. Reproductive processes, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) system and the mechanisms that control sex behavior are most proximally sensitive to the availability of oxidizable metabolic fuels. The role of hormones, such as insulin and leptin, are not understood, but there are two possible ways they might control food intake and reproduction. They either mediate the effects of energy metabolism on reproduction or they modulate the availability of metabolic fuels in the brain or periphery. This review examines the neural pathways from fuel detectors to the central effector system emphasizing the following points: first, metabolic stimuli can directly influence the effector systems independently from the hormones that bind to these central effector systems. For example, in some cases, excess energy storage in adipose tissue causes deficits in the pool of oxidizable fuels available for the reproductive system. Thus, in such cases, reproduction is inhibited despite a high body fat content and high plasma concentrations of hormones that are thought to stimulate reproductive processes. The deficit in fuels creates a primary sensory stimulus that is inhibitory to the reproductive system, despite high concentrations of hormones, such as insulin and leptin. Second, hormones might influence the central effector systems [including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and sex behavior] indirectly by modulating the metabolic stimulus. Third, the critical neural circuitry involves extrahypothalamic sites, such as the caudal brain stem, and projections from the brain stem to the forebrain. Catecholamines, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) are probably involved. Fourth, the metabolic stimuli and chemical messengers affect the motivation to engage in ingestive and sex behaviors instead of, or in addition to, affecting the ability to perform these behaviors. Finally, it is important to study these metabolic events and chemical messengers in a wider variety of species under natural or seminatural circumstances.

Effects of leptin administration on lactational infertility in food-restricted rats depend on milk delivery

Leptin administration has been shown to prevent the disruptive effects of acute food deprivation on reproductive function in cycling females and lactating females. We examined the ability of intracerebroventricular leptin administration to ameliorate the effects of food restriction for the first 2 wk postpartum on length of lactational infertility. Leptin administration did not reduce the effects of food restriction on reproductive function at either time period ( days 8-15 and 15-22 postpartum) or dose (1 and 10 μg/day) administered. Because of the sharp contrast between these results and the ability of leptin to offset the effects of acute food deprivation in lactating rats, the remaining studies investigated the possible causes of this difference. Both central and peripheral leptin administration eliminated food deprivation-induced prolongation of lactational infertility, suggesting that neither route of administration nor dose was a factor. However, we noticed that, whereas chronically food-restricted females continue to deliver milk to their young, acutely food-deprived females do not. To test the hypothesis that the continued energetic drain of milk production and delivery might prevent the ability of exogenous leptin administration to eliminate the effects of undernutrition, leptin was administered to food-restricted, lactating rats prevented from delivering milk. In this situation intracerebroventricular leptin treatment completely eliminated the effects of food restriction on lactational infertility, suggesting that leptin contributes to the maintenance of reproductive function via two pathways: direct binding in the central nervous system and through increasing the availability of oxidizable metabolic fuels.

The neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor mediates NPY‐induced inhibition of the gonadotrope axis under poor metabolic conditions

Hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) plays a central role in the control of food intake, energy balance, and modulation of neuroendocrine functions. In particular, an increase in NPY expression participates in the inhibition of the reproductive activity under poor nutritional conditions. The present study was designed to evaluate further the involvement of the Y1 subtype of NPY receptors in these effects. Food intake, body weight gain, and the onset of puberty were studied in groups of wild-type and Y1 deficient mice that were either fed ad libitum or subjected to a 30% restriction in food intake. This moderate feeding restriction induced a similar deficit in body weight gain in wild-type and in Y1 knockout mice. However, although wild-type mice experienced the expected delay of puberty, all mice in the food restriction group and lacking Y1 could go through puberty over the time of the experiment despite decreases in circulating leptin levels and increases in hypothalamic NPY expression. This observation demonstrates that the absence of Y1 impairs the perception of decreasing energy stores by the gonadotrope axis, demonstrating a physiological role for Y1 in the sensing of endogenous metabolic parameters by the hypothalamus.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) delays the oestrogen-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in the ovariectomized ewe: further evidence that NPY has a predominant negative effect on LH secretion in the ewe

Studies in rats suggest that neuropeptide Y (NPY) plays a stimulatory role in the generation of the preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, via the Y1 receptor. We have investigated this issue using the oestradiol benzoate (EB)-treated ovariectomized (OVX) ewe which is a model for the preovulatory LH surge. A Y1 receptor antagonist (BIBO3304) was infused (25 microg/h) into the third cerebral ventricle (III-V) from 2 h before EB injection for 24 h, and had no effect on the ensuing LH surge. Using in situ hybridization, we then examined expression of NPY mRNA in the arcuate nucleus during the luteal, follicular and oestrous phases of the oestrous cycle, and found that levels were greatest during the luteal phase. Thus, reduced NPY synthesis might be an integral factor in the events leading to the cyclic preovulatory LH surge. This was tested by infusion of NPY (25 microg/h) into the III-V (as above). The NPY infusion delayed the LH surge until the infusion was ceased. High levels of NPY expression during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle may be caused by progesterone. Thus, we determined whether NPY cells possess progesterone receptors (PR) and whether progesterone treatment up-regulates NPY mRNA expression in the arcuate nucleus. Immunohistochemistry for NPY and PR was performed in OVX, oestrogen-treated ewes, but no NPY cells of the arcuate nucleus were seen to colocalize PR. In situ hybridization for NPY was performed in OVX and OVX ewes treated with progesterone. There was no significant effect of progesterone treatment on NPY mRNA expression in the arcuate nucleus. We conclude that chronically elevated levels of NPY block the preovulatory surge of gonadotropin-releasing hormone/LH secretion in sheep, but high levels of NPY mRNA expression in the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle cannot be explained by an action of progesterone.

Abnormal response of the neuropeptide Y-deficient mouse reproductive axis to food deprivation but not lactation

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) plays a key role in both food intake and GnRH secretion. Food deprivation elevates hypothalamic NPY activity and suppresses LH and gonadal steroid secretion. Similarly, lactation up-regulates NPY expression as food consumption increases and estrous cycles cease. These observations suggest that NPY coordinates reproductive suppression in response to energy deficiency; if so, the reproductive axis of NPY knockout (KO) mice should be impervious to lactation and food deprivation. We monitored food consumption, body weight, and estrous cyclicity during lactation in NPY KO mice with large and small litters. NPY KO mice with either litter size resembled wild types (WTs) in weight regulation and food consumption. Large-litter mothers had longer anestrous periods and smaller pups at weaning, but NPY KOs and WTs did not differ in either respect. We also examined the LH response of NPY KO mice to 48 h without food. Basal levels of LH in ovariectomized NPY KO animals decreased in response to fasting, but LH levels in intact and estrogen-treated ovariectomized NPY KO animals did not. In contrast, WTs consistently showed fasting-induced suppression of LH. Our findings suggest that other systems can sustain the hyperphagia of lactation and NPY alone is not responsible for suppressing cyclicity during lactation. Nevertheless, the suppression of basal LH release that accompanies food deprivation in normal female mice appears to require the steroid-dependent actions of NPY.