Daily induction combination treatment with alpha 2b interferon and ribavirin or standard combination treatment in naive chronic hepatitis C patients. A multicentre randomized controlled trial

Impact of high-dose peginterferon alfa-2A on virological response rates in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1: a randomized controlled trial

This study tested the hypothesis that high-dose peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFNalpha-2a) for the first 12 weeks would increase early and sustained virological response (SVR) rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1. Eight hundred ninety-six patients were randomized 1:1 to 360 microg (n = 448) or 180 microg (n = 448) PEG-IFNalpha-2a weekly plus ribavirin at 1000-1200 mg/day for 12 weeks, followed by 36 weeks of 180 microg PEG-IFNalpha-2a weekly plus ribavirin at 1000-1200 mg/day with 871 patients evaluable for the intention-to-treat analysis. Virological responses were assessed by TaqMan (limit of detection 15 IU/mL) at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 (end of therapy), and 24 weeks following therapy (SVR). Undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA rates were significantly higher among patients receiving high-dose induction therapy at week 4 (36% versus 26%, P < 0.005), week 8 (61% versus 50%, P < 0.005), and week 12 (74% versus 62%, P < 0.005). However, SVR was not significantly different between patients receiving high-dose (53%) and standard (50%) therapy. Significant baseline prognostic factors for SVR included age, sex, race, histological stage, and viral load. SVR was considerably higher among patients with no or minimal fibrosis (64% and 60%, respectively) compared to those with severe fibrosis/cirrhosis (28% and 24%, respectively). The frequency of serious adverse events and drug discontinuations were similar in both groups, whereas PEG-IFN dose modification, weight and appetite reduction, and grade IV neutropenia were significantly higher in the induction arm.

CONCLUSION

Induction dosing with 360 microg/week PEG-IFNalpha-2a for 12 weeks was well tolerated and enhanced early virological response but not SVR rates. The high SVR rates in patients with minimal fibrosis highlight the benefit of early treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1.

Safety and efficacy of an induction dose of pegylated interferon alpha-2a on early hepatitis C virus kinetics in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: the CORAL-1 multicentre pilot study

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an induction dose of pegylated interferon alpha 2a (IFN-alpha2a) on the 12-week hepatitis C virus (HCV) kinetics in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients co-infected with HCV. One hundred sixteen HIV/HCV co-infected patients from nine hospitals in Spain were randomized to receive 270 microg/week of pegylated IFN-alpha2a for 4 weeks followed by 180 microg/week for 8 weeks or 180 microg/week for 12 weeks. Ribavirin was given at a daily dose of 1000 or 1200 mg. The main outcome measure was the percentage of patients achieving an HCV-RNA below 50 IU/mL or a decrease of 2 or more log(10) at week 12 (early virologic response, EVR). HCV-RNA was measured at baseline, weekly, for the first 4 weeks and monthly thereafter. We observed no difference in the percentage of patients achieving an EVR between arms (on-treatment, 74% in both arms; intention-to-treat, 70% in the induction arm and 67% in the control arm), nor were there differences in the percentage achieving an undetectable HCV qualitative polymerase chain reaction at any time points or in the decrease in HCV-RNA from baseline. No differences were found between arms in the percentage of dropouts (8% in the whole study population). Our study failed to find a benefit of an induction dose of 270 microg/week of pegylated IFN-alpha2a for 4 weeks on the EVR in co-infected patients who are treatment naive. Despite the lack of benefit with this regimen, induction therapy with this schedule was safe and well tolerated in co-infected patients.

[Treatment options for chronic hepatitis C virus infection]

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is rather high. Its most frequent consequences are chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HCV INFECTION

In treatment of chronic HCV infection, interferons have antiviral, anriproliferative, and immunoregulatory action. Within the cell, they induce protein synthesis, inhibiting viral replication. The most important among them are RNA dependent protein kinase, and eukaryotic initiation factor. However, viral proteins prevent their phosphorylation and activation. In order to overcome this problem, treatment is prolonged, higher doses of lFN are used, as well as induction therapy. The optimal period for viral response is 52 weeks, while induction therapy has shown controversial results.

Serum levels of anti-NS4a and anti-NS5a predict treatment response of patients with chronic hepatitis C

In order to understand better the clinical significance and prognostic value of antibody responses to HCV proteins and in search for parameters that may allow the early identification of non-sustained responders to therapy, antibody levels were measured against NS3, NS4a and NS5a at baseline in the serum of 120 patients chronically infected with HCV of genotype 1 that were classified as sustained responders, relapsers, or non-responders to therapy. The capacity of these antibody tests to predict therapy-outcome was evaluated. While no differences were observed in the anti-NS3 responses in these different response groups, anti-NS4a and anti-NS5a antibodies were observed more frequently and at higher titres in sustained responders versus non-responders or non-sustained responders (=non-responders + relapsers). Based on this observation, a combination of test results consisting of 'the absence of NS4a (AA 1687-1718) antibody at baseline and the presence of HCV-RNA exceeding 10(5) IU/ml after 1 week of treatment' was identified which predicts non-sustained response to treatment with 100% certainty. Replacing the HCV-RNA decision limit by a HCV-core antigen level of >15 pg/ml resulted in the same predictive value. The proposed algorithm also holds for patients treated with peg-interferon and ribavirin. In conclusion, in patients with chronic HCV infection, the decision to continue or stop treatment can be made after 1 week of treatment with (peg)-interferon alpha and ribavirin.

Combination Therapy of Interferon and Ribavirin Versus Interferon Monotherapy in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy (CT) versus interferon monotherapy (IMT) in inducing sustained response in interferon-naïve, relapser, and nonresponder chronic hepatitis C patients. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database for clinical trials published in the period between 1995 and 2003. A total of 31 randomized trials and 7 nonrandomized trials comparing CT with interferon alone or comparing different dose regimens of CT were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was sustained virological response. The summary estimate of the odds ratio was obtained using the random effect model. The study showed that sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in interferon-naïve, relapser, and nonrespondent chronic hepatitis C patients who were on CT compared to IMT (odds ratio = 3.23, 17.65, and 4.71, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in virological and biochemical responses between different dose regimens of CT. Side effects, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation rates were significantly higher in patients receiving CT compared with IMT. Treatment with interferon plus ribavirin has a significant benefit on the virological and biochemical response in patients with chronic hepatitis C irrespective to the previous treatment, and it should be considered the treatment of choice in naïve, relapser, and nonrespondent chronic hepatitis C patients.

Similar compliance and effect of treatment in chronic hepatitis C resulting from intravenous drug use in comparison with other infection causes

OBJECTIVES

There is some reluctance to treat intravenous drug users (IVDUs) with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) because of presumed lower compliance and response to antiviral therapy. We intended to evaluate the compliance and response to antiviral treatment for CHC in IVDUs compared with non-IVDUs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study--secondary analysis of the results of a treatment trial--was performed in Belgium and The Netherlands. A total of 406 previously untreated CHC patients, including 98 (24%) IVDUs, were studied for compliance (presentation at the end of treatment), complete response (alanine aminotransferase within normal limits and serum hepatitis C virus polymerase chain reaction negative) at the end of therapy and sustained virological response (SVR).

RESULTS

Non-compliance (8.2%) in IVDUs was not different from non-IVDUs (6.8%) (relative risk=1.20; 95% confidence interval=0.55-2.62). Complete response after controlling for hepatitis C virus was similar (relative risk=1.19; 95% confidence interval=0.89-1.60). Controlling for treatment arm, age, sex, presence of cirrhosis or hepatitis C virus viral load before treatment did not change these results. There was a marginally significant difference in the sustained virological response between IVDUs (46.6%) and non-IVDUs (34.6%) (relative risk=1.35; 95% confidence interval=1.00-1.81), also disappearing after adjusting for genotype. No difference in compliance or sustained virological response was found between active and non-active IVDUs or between IVDU patients in or without a methadone maintenance program.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of Benelux patients, IVDUs showed similar compliance and response to treatment with interferon and ribavirin compared with other patients with CHC infection. Therefore, it is no longer justifiable to withhold treatment to chronic hepatitis C patients who use intravenous drugs.

Comparison of qualitative (COBAS AMPLICOR HCV 2.0 versus VERSANT HCV RNA) and quantitative (COBAS AMPLICOR HCV monitor 2.0 versus VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0) assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA detection and quantification: impact on diagnosis and treatment of HCV infections

Quantitative measurements of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA are becoming increasingly important in the management of HCV-infected patients. Here we compared two quantitative assays, the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Monitor 2.0 assay (Roche Diagnostics) and the branched DNA-based VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (Bayer Diagnostics) for HCV RNA measurement in 344 samples derived from 120 patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. The overall concordance between the results of the two tests was 95%, and the HCV RNA titers within the dynamic ranges of the assays correlated very well (r2=0.86). Furthermore, both tests performed equally well in determining an early viral response at week 1 or 4 during antiviral therapy. We also compared two qualitative HCV RNA detection assays: the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV 2.0 assay versus the transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)-based VERSANT HCV RNA qualitative assay. Stored samples from sustained responders to interferon-ribavirin therapy were retested by the HCV TMA assay and were found to contain no detectable HCV RNA, demonstrating complete concordance between the results of PCR and TMA. However, HCV RNA was detected by the TMA assay in end-of-treatment (ETR) samples from 33% of patients with relapses who were HCV RNA negative according to the COBAS AMPLICOR assay. This observation suggests that a TMA assay can lead to a more correct definition of the ETR response.

Advances in hepatitis B and C

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatitis B and C infections are prevalent around the world and a major health burden due to the associated complications of hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma which occur in the context of chronic infection. Significant advances are being made in assessing and treating infected patients and recent studies are now targeting patients who have failed to respond to previous treatments or who have associated co-morbidities. The purpose of this article to review the recent literature on the subject of hepatitis B and C infections with particular focus on new treatment options, new approaches in patients who have previously failed therapy and in those who have co-morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large number of studies have been carried out investigating the roles of varying doses, targeting treatment in particular groups and new treatment options in patients infected with hepatitis B and C. Several key findings such as the value of prolonging treatment in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection, the use of pegylated interferon in chronic hepatitis B infection and the emergence of new treatments such as adefovir for resistant hepatitis B infection, as well as treatment of patients co-infected with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus, have dominated the recent literature. Patients in particular groups such as those who have had liver transplantation or who are immunosuppressed have also received added attention.

SUMMARY

Hepatitis B and C infections are the focus of much current attention with particular regard to new and emerging treatment options which are becoming increasingly focused on varying patient groups.

Retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy with daily interferon plus ribavirin plus amantadine

There is currently no accepted therapeutic regimen for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to standard combination treatment with interferon-alpha plus ribavirin. We investigated triple combination treatment with induction dosing of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine in these difficult-to-treat patients. Nonresponders (n = 67), breakthroughs (n = 16) and relapsers (n = 19) to previous interferon/ribavirin combination treatment of at least 6 months were included. For the first 16 weeks, patients received interferon-alpha2a 6 MU daily, ribavirin 800-1200 mg/d, and amantadine 200 mg/d. In cases of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12, treatment was continued with interferon-alpha2a 6 MU every other day and the same doses of ribavirin and amantadine until week 48. In cases of HCV RNA positivity at week 12, treatment was stopped. A total of 102 patients were enrolled (80%: genotype 1, 19%: cirrhosis). HCV RNA was negative in 35/102 patients (34%) at week 12 and in 27/ 102 patients (26%) at the end of treatment. Virological response was sustained in 15/102 patients (15%). On-treatment virological response was higher in previous relapsers/breakthroughs than in previous nonresponders (week 12: 49% vs. 27%, p < 0.05; week 48: 46% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) but no such difference was found for sustained virological response (20% vs. 12%, NS). In conclusion, triple combination treatment with daily interferon-alpha plus ribavirin plus amantadine for 3 months can induce virological response in a considerable number of nonresponders/relapsers to previous dual combination treatment, but the sustained virological response rate remains low.