The replication checkpoint control in Bacillus subtilis: identification of a novel RTP-binding sequence essential for the replication fork arrest after induction of the stringent response

Single-Molecule Dynamics at a Bacterial Replication Fork after Nutritional Downshift or Chemically Induced Block in Replication

Replication forks must respond to changes in nutrient conditions, especially in bacterial cells. By investigating the single-molecule dynamics of replicative helicase DnaC, DNA primase DnaG, and lagging-strand polymerase DnaE in the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis, we show that proteins react differently to stress conditions in response to transient replication blocks due to DNA damage, to inhibition of the replicative polymerase, or to downshift of serine availability. DnaG appears to be recruited to the forks by a diffusion and capture mechanism, becomes more statically associated after the arrest of polymerase, but binds less frequently after fork blocks due to DNA damage or to nutritional downshift. These results indicate that binding of the alarmone (p)ppGpp due to stringent response prevents DnaG from binding to forks rather than blocking bound primase. Dissimilar behavior of DnaG and DnaE suggests that both proteins are recruited independently to the forks rather than jointly. Turnover of all three proteins was increased during replication block after nutritional downshift, different from the situation due to DNA damage or polymerase inhibition, showing high plasticity of forks in response to different stress conditions. Forks persisted during all stress conditions, apparently ensuring rapid return to replication extension.IMPORTANCE All cells need to adjust DNA replication, which is achieved by a well-orchestrated multiprotein complex, in response to changes in physiological and environmental conditions. For replication forks, it is extremely challenging to meet with conditions where amino acids are rapidly depleted from cells, called the stringent response, to deal with the inhibition of one of the centrally involved proteins or with DNA modifications that arrest the progression of forks. By tracking helicase (DnaC), primase (DnaG), and polymerase (DnaE), central proteins of Bacillus subtilis replication forks, at a single molecule level in real time, we found that interactions of the three proteins with replication forks change in different manners under different stress conditions, revealing an intriguing plasticity of replication forks in dealing with replication obstacles. We have devised a new tool to determine rates of exchange between static movement (binding to a much larger complex) and free diffusion, showing that during stringent response, all proteins have highly increased exchange rates, slowing down overall replication, while inactivation of polymerase or replication roadblocks leaves forks largely intact, allowing rapid restart once obstacles are removed.

The stringent response regulator (p) ppGpp mediates virulence gene expression and survival in Erwinia amylovora

Background

The nucleotide second messengers, i.e., guanosine tetraphosphate and pentaphosphate [collectively referred to as (p) ppGpp], trigger the stringent response under nutrient starvation conditions and play an essential role in virulence in the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Here, we present transcriptomic analyses to uncover the overall effect of (p) ppGpp-mediated stringent response in E. amylovora in the hrp-inducing minimal medium (HMM).

Results

In this study, we investigated the transcriptomic changes of the (p) ppGpp⁰ mutant under the type III secretion system (T3SS)-inducing condition using RNA-seq. A total of 1314 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was uncovered, representing more than one third (36.8%) of all genes in the E. amylovora genome. Compared to the wild-type, the (p) ppGpp⁰ mutant showed down-regulation of genes involved in peptide ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters and virulence-related processes, including type III secretion system (T3SS), biofilm, and motility. Interestingly, in contrast to previous reports, the (p) ppGpp⁰ mutant showed up-regulation of amino acid biosynthesis genes, suggesting that it might be due to that these amino acid biosynthesis genes are indirectly regulated by (p) ppGpp in E. amylovora or represent specific culturing condition used. Furthermore, the (p) ppGpp⁰ mutant exhibited up-regulation of genes involved in translation, SOS response, DNA replication, chromosome segregation, as well as biosynthesis of nucleotide, fatty acid and lipid.

Conclusion

These findings suggested that in HMM environment, E. amylovora might use (p) ppGpp as a signal to activate virulence gene expression, and simultaneously mediate the balance between virulence and survival by negatively regulating DNA replication, translation, cell division, as well as biosynthesis of nucleotide, amino acid, fatty acid, and lipid. Therefore, (p) ppGpp could be a promising target for developing novel control measures to fight against this devastating disease of apples and pears.

(p)ppGpp and the bacterial cell cycle

Genes of the Rel/Spo homolog (RSH) superfamily synthesize and/or hydrolyse the modified nucleotides pppGpp/ ppGpp (collectively referred to as (p)ppGpp) and are prevalent across diverse bacteria and in plant chloroplasts. Bacteria accumulate (p)ppGpp in response to nutrient deprivation (generically called the stringent response) and elicit appropriate adaptive responses mainly through the regulation of transcription. Although at different concentrations (p)ppGpp affect the expression of distinct set of genes, the two well-characterized responses are reduction in expression of the protein synthesis machinery and increase in the expression of genes coding for amino acid biosynthesis. In Escherichia coli, the cellular (p)ppGpp level inversely correlates with the growth rate and increasing its concentration decreases the steady state growth rate in a defined growth medium. Since change in growth rate must be accompanied by changes in cell cycle parameters set through the activities of the DNA replication and cell division apparatus, (p)ppGpp could coordinate protein synthesis (cell mass increase) with these processes. Here we review the role of (p)ppGpp in bacterial cell cycle regulation.

Stress-Induced Mutagenesis

Early research on the origins and mechanisms of mutation led to the establishment of the dogma that, in the absence of external forces, spontaneous mutation rates are constant. However, recent results from a variety of experimental systems suggest that mutation rates can increase in response to selective pressures. This chapter summarizes data demonstrating that,under stressful conditions, Escherichia coli and Salmonella can increase the likelihood of beneficial mutations by modulating their potential for genetic change.Several experimental systems used to study stress-induced mutagenesis are discussed, with special emphasison the Foster-Cairns system for "adaptive mutation" in E. coli and Salmonella. Examples from other model systems are given to illustrate that stress-induced mutagenesis is a natural and general phenomenon that is not confined to enteric bacteria. Finally, some of the controversy in the field of stress-induced mutagenesis is summarized and discussed, and a perspective on the current state of the field is provided.

Role of GTPases in bacterial ribosome assembly

The assembly of the ribosome, a complex molecular machine composed of RNA and protein, is a poorly understood process. Recent work has demonstrated that GTPases are likely to play key roles in the assembly of ribosomes in bacteria and eukaryotes. This review highlights several bacterial ribosome assembly GTPases (RA-GTPases) and discusses possible functions for these proteins in the biogenesis of individual ribosomal subunits and subunit joining. RA-GTPases appear to link various aspects of the cell cycle and metabolism with translation. How these RA-GTPases may coordinate these connections are discussed.

Effects of oriC relocation on control of replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis

In bacteria, DNA replication initiation is tightly regulated in order to coordinate chromosome replication with cell growth. InEscherichia coli, positive factors and negative regulatory mechanisms playing important roles in the strict control of DNA replication initiation have been reported. However, it remains unclear how bacterial cells recognize the right time for replication initiation during the cell cycle. In the Gram-positive bacteriumBacillus subtilis, much less is known about the regulation of replication initiation, specifically, regarding negative control mechanisms which ensure replication initiation only once per cell cycle. Here we report that replication initiation was greatly enhanced in strains that had the origin of replication (oriC) relocated to various loci on the chromosome. WhenoriCwas relocated to new loci further than 250 kb counterclockwise from the native locus, replication initiation became asynchronous and earlier than in the wild-type cells. In twooriC-relocated strains (oriCatargGorpnbA, 25 ° or 30 ° on the 36 ° chromosome map, respectively), DnaA levels were higher than in the wild-type but not enough to cause earlier initiation of replication. Our results suggest that the initiation capacity of replication is accumulated well before the actual time of initiation, and its release may be suppressed by a unique DNA structure formed near the nativeoriClocus.

Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria

Bacteria spend their lives buffeted by changing environmental conditions. To adapt to and survive these stresses, bacteria have global response systems that result in sweeping changes in gene expression and cellular metabolism. These responses are controlled by master regulators, which include: alternative sigma factors, such as RpoS and RpoH; small molecule effectors, such as ppGpp; gene repressors such as LexA; and, inorganic molecules, such as polyphosphate. The response pathways extensively overlap and are induced to various extents by the same environmental stresses. These stresses include nutritional deprivation, DNA damage, temperature shift, and exposure to antibiotics. All of these global stress responses include functions that can increase genetic variability. In particular, up-regulation and activation of error-prone DNA polymerases, down-regulation of error-correcting enzymes, and movement of mobile genetic elements are common features of several stress responses. The result is that under a variety of stressful conditions, bacteria are induced for genetic change. This transient mutator state may be important for adaptive evolution.

Mechanisms of physiological regulation of RNA synthesis in bacteria: new discoveries breaking old schemes

Although in bacterial cells all genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase, there are 2 additional enzymes capable of catalyzing RNA synthesis: poly(A) polymerase I, which adds poly(A) residues to transcripts, and primase, which produces primers for DNA replication. Mechanisms of actions of these 3 RNA-synthesizing enzymes were investigated for many years, and schemes of their regulations have been proposed and generally accepted. Nevertheless, recent discoveries indicated that apart from well-understood mechanisms, there are additional regulatory processes, beyond the established schemes, which allow bacterial cells to respond to changing environmental and physiological conditions. These newly discovered mechanisms, which are discussed in this review, include: (i) specific regulation of gene expression by RNA polyadenylation, (ii) control of DNA replication by interactions of the starvation alarmones, guanosine pentaphosphate and guanosine tetraphosphate, (p)ppGpp, with DnaG primase, (iii) a role for the DksA protein in ppGpp-mediated regulation of transcription, (iv) allosteric modulation of the RNA polymerase catalytic reaction by specific inhibitors of transcription, rifamycins, (v) stimulation of transcription initiation by proteins binding downstream of the promoter sequences, and (vi) promoter-dependent control of transcription antitermination efficiency.

Replication fork stalling at natural impediments

Accurate and complete replication of the genome in every cell division is a prerequisite of genomic stability. Thus, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic replication forks are extremely precise and robust molecular machines that have evolved to be up to the task. However, it has recently become clear that the replication fork is more of a hurdler than a runner: it must overcome various obstacles present on its way. Such obstacles can be called natural impediments to DNA replication, as opposed to external and genetic factors. Natural impediments to DNA replication are particular DNA binding proteins, unusual secondary structures in DNA, and transcription complexes that occasionally (in eukaryotes) or constantly (in prokaryotes) operate on replicating templates. This review describes the mechanisms and consequences of replication stalling at various natural impediments, with an emphasis on the role of replication stalling in genomic instability.

Implication of stringent response in the increase of mutability of the whiG and whiH genes during Streptomyces coelicolor development

In Streptomyces ambofaciens, genetic instability occurring during aerial mycelium development gives rise to white mutant papillae on colonies. Pig-pap mutants deriving from such papillae are unable to sporulate and devoid of the large genome rearrangement usually observed in the other Streptomyces mutants that genetic instability generated. Pig-pap mutants frequently harboured discrete mutations affecting the whiG gene. Furthermore, it has been established that the production of papillae dramatically increased when S. ambofaciens was grown under an amino acid limitation. In this work, we tested the implication of the stringent response, induced during an amino acid limitation, in the production of white papillae in Streptomyces coelicolor, a species which is phylogenetically close to S. ambofaciens. First, we showed that S. coelicolor produced mutant papillae and that this production was increased under an amino acid limitation. Secondly, we showed that the Pig-pap mutants generated both with and without amino acid limitation frequently exhibited mutations in whiH or whiG genes. Finally, we observed that a relA mutant of S. coelicolor, which was unable to elicit the stringent response under an amino acid limitation, was also unable to produce papillae. The restoration of the ability to elicit the stringent response also restored the papillae production. These papillae gave rise to Pig-pap mutants displaying the same characteristics as Pig-pap mutants spontaneously appearing on wild-type colonies. Altogether, these results show that whatever the underlying mechanism, the stringent response is involved in the production of white papillae in S. coelicolor.

Magic spots cast a spell on DNA primase

The bacterial signaling molecules ppGpp and pppGpp regulate transcription initiation in response to starvation by altering RNA polymerase activity. In this issue, Wang et al. (2007) show that (p)ppGpp also inhibits DNA replication elongation by interfering with DNA primase activity. Halting replication may help cells to maintain genomic integrity during periods of transient nutrient limitation.

Nutritional control of elongation of DNA replication by (p)ppGpp

DNA replication is highly regulated in most organisms. Although much research has focused on mechanisms that regulate initiation of replication, mechanisms that regulate elongation of replication are less well understood. We characterized a mechanism that regulates replication elongation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Replication elongation was inhibited within minutes after amino acid starvation, regardless of where the replication forks were located on the chromosome. We found that small nucleotides ppGpp and pppGpp, which are induced upon starvation, appeared to inhibit replication directly by inhibiting primase, an essential component of the replication machinery. The replication forks arrested with (p)ppGpp did not recruit the recombination protein RecA, indicating that the forks are not disrupted. (p)ppGpp appear to be part of a surveillance mechanism that links nutrient availability to replication by rapidly inhibiting replication in starved cells, thereby preventing replication-fork disruption. This control may be important for cells to maintain genomic integrity.

Hyperinitiation of DNA replication in Escherichia coli leads to replication fork collapse and inviability

Elevated dnaA expression from a multicopy plasmid induces more frequent initiation from the Escherichia coli replication origin, oriC, but viability is maintained. In comparison, chromosomally encoded dnaAcos also stimulates initiation, but this is lethal. By quantitative methods, we show that the level of initiation induced by elevated dnaA expression leads to collapsed replication forks that are mostly within 10 map units of oriC. Because forks collapse randomly, nucleoprotein complexes at specific sites such as datA are not the cause. When replication restart is blocked by a mutation in recB or priA, the increased initiations via elevated dnaA expression causes inviability. The amount of collapsed forks is substantially higher under elevated expression of dnaAcos compared to that of dnaA. We propose that the lethal phenotype of chromosomally encoded dnaAcos is a result of hyperinitiation that overwhelms the repair capacity of the cell.

Localization of rRNA synthesis in Bacillus subtilis: characterization of loci involved in transcription focus formation

In Bacillus subtilis, RNA polymerase becomes concentrated into regions of the nucleoid called transcription foci. With green fluorescent protein-tagged RNA polymerase, these structures are only observed at higher growth rates and have been shown to represent the sites of rRNA synthesis. There are 10 rRNA (rrn) operons distributed around nearly half of the chromosome. In this study we analyzed the rrn composition of transcription foci with fluorescently tagged loci and showed that they comprise the origin-proximal operon rrnO but not the more dispersed rrnE or rrnD. This suggests that transcription foci comprise only the seven origin-proximal operons rrnO, rrnA, rrnJ, rrnW, rrnI, rrnH, and rrnG. These results have important implications for our understanding of microbial chromosome structure.

The bacterial replication initiator DnaA. DnaA and oriC, the bacterial mode to initiate DNA replication

The initiation of replication is the central event in the bacterial cell cycle. Cells control the rate of DNA synthesis by modulating the frequency with which new chains are initiated, like all macromolecular synthesis. The end of the replication cycle provides a checkpoint that must be executed for cell division to occur. This review summarizes recent insight into the biochemistry, genetics and control of the initiation of replication in bacteria, and the central role of the initiator protein DnaA.

Subcellular localization of the Bacillus subtilis structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein

The Bacillus subtilis structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein is a member of a large family of proteins involved in chromosome organization. We found that SMC is a moderately abundant protein ( approximately 1000 dimers per cell). In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation assays revealed that SMC binds to many regions on the chromosome. Visualization of SMC in live cells using a fusion to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and in fixed cells using immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that a portion of SMC localizes as discrete foci in positions similar to that of the DNA replication machinery (replisome). When visualized simultaneously, SMC and the replisome were often in similar regions of the cell but did not always co-localize. Persistence of SMC foci did not depend on ongoing replication, but did depend on ScpA and ScpB, two proteins thought to interact with SMC. Our results indicate that SMC is bound to many sites on the chromosome and a concentration of SMC is localized near replication forks, perhaps there to bind and organize newly replicated DNA.

Revisiting the stringent response, ppGpp and starvation signaling

Microbial adaptation to environmental stress plays an important role in survival. It is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying the survival of microbes under stress, as they may eventually aid in the successful control of the growth and persistence of these organisms. During nutrient starvation, Escherichia coli elicits a stringent response to conserve energy. The hallmark of the stringent response is the accumulation of guanosine tetra- (ppGpp) and pentaphosphates (pppGpp), which probably bind RNA polymerase to regulate gene expression at certain promoters. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the stringent responses of other microbes, with a view to correlating it with sporulation, virulence and long-term persistence.

A replication terminus located at or near a replication checkpoint of Bacillus subtilis functions independently of stringent control

We have examined a replication terminus (psiL1) located on the left arm of the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis and within the yxcC gene and at or near the left replication checkpoint that is activated under stringent conditions. The psiL1 sequence appears to bind to two dimers of the replication terminator protein (RTP) rather weakly and seems to possess overlapping core and auxiliary sites that have some sequence similarities with normal Ter sites. Surprisingly, the asymmetrical, isolated psiL1 site arrested replication forks in vivo in both orientations and independent of stringent control. In vitro, the sequence arrested DnaB helicase in both orientations, albeit more weakly than the normal Ter1 terminus. The key points of mechanistic interest that emerge from the present work are: (i) strong binding of a Ter (psiL1) sequence to RTP did not appear to be essential for fork arrest and (ii) polarity of fork arrest could not be correlated in this case with just symmetrical protein-DNA interaction at the core and auxiliary sites of psiL1. On the basis of the result it would appear that the weak RTP-L1Ter interaction cannot by itself account for fork arrest, thus suggesting a role for DnaB-RTP interaction.

Movement of replicating DNA through a stationary replisome

We found that DNA is replicated at a central stationary polymerase, and each replicated region moves away from the replisome. In Bacillus subtilis, DNA polymerase is predominantly located at or near midcell. When replication was blocked in a specific chromosomal region, that region was centrally located with DNA polymerase. Upon release of the block, each copy of the duplicated region was located toward opposite cell poles, away from the central replisome. In a roughly synchronous population of cells, a region of chromosome between origin and terminus moved to the replisome prior to duplication. Thus, the polymerase at the replication forks is stationary, and the template is pulled in and released outward during duplication. We propose that B. subtilis, and probably many bacteria, harness energy released during nucleotide condensation by a stationary replisome to facilitate chromosome partitioning.

Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest

Chromosome replication is not a uniform and continuous process. Replication forks can be slowed down or arrested by DNA secondary structures, specific protein-DNA complexes, specific DNA-RNA hybrids, or interactions between the replication and transcription machineries. Replication arrest has important implications for the topology of replication intermediates and can trigger homologous and illegitimate recombination. Thus, replication arrest may be a key factor in genome instability. Several examples of these phenomena are reviewed here.