National audit of citrate toxicity in plateletpheresis donors

Bone Turnover Markers Changes Induced by Plateletpheresis May Be Minimized with Oral Supplementation of Calcium, Minerals, and Vitamin D before the Procedures: A Non-Randomized, Controlled Study

Apheresis allows the collection of specific blood components but changes serum calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and hormones involved in bone metabolism due to citrate infusion. We assessed the effect of oral supplementation of calcium, vitamin D, and minerals as pills or an enriched diet before plateletpheresis donation on levels of divalent cations, hormones, and bone turnover markers that may prevent metabolic changes. Methods: Non-randomized controlled study including 134 donors. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), Ca, Mg, Zn, Cu, osteocalcin (OC), vitamin D, and type-1 collagen C-terminal telopeptide (CTX-1) levels were measured at baseline and post-procedure. Donors were divided into four groups: supplemented with calcium carbonate and vitamin D (cal + vitd); those receiving calcium, minerals, and vitamin D (cal + vitd + min); those receiving a calcium-rich diet (diet) and a control group (control). Results: PTH levels increased >1-fold, whereas tCa, tMg, Zn, Cu, iCa, iMg, and vitamin D levels decreased immediately after apheresis amongst donors of any group; when these levels were measured two weeks later, donors in the calcium-vitd and cal + vitd + min groups returned to basal values; donors in the cal + vitd + min group were the only group that kept their levels of OC and CTX unchanged at the different study times. Conclusions: Bone turnover markers changes induced by plateletpheresis may be minimized with oral supplementation of calcium, minerals, and vitamin D two days before the procedures.

Analysis of influencing factors of serum total protein and serum calcium content in plasma donors

Background and objectives

The adverse effects of plasma donation on the body has lowered the odds of donation. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of abnormal serum calcium and total serum protein related to plasma donation, identify the influencing factors, and come up with suggestions to make plasma donation safer.

Methods

Donors from 10 plasmapheresis centers in five provinces of China participated in this study. Serum samples were collected before donation. Serum calcium was measured by arsenazo III colorimetry, and the biuret method was used for total serum protein assay. An automatic biochemical analyzer was used to conduct serum calcium and total serum protein tests.

Results

The mean serum calcium was 2.3 ± 0.15 mmol/L and total serum protein was 67.75 ± 6.02 g/L. The proportions of plasma donors whose serum calcium and total serum protein were lower than normal were 20.55% (815/3,966) and 27.99% (1,111/3,969), respectively. There were significant differences in mean serum calcium and total serum protein of plasma donors with different plasma donation frequencies, gender, age, regions, and body mass index (BMI), (all p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that donation frequencies, age, BMI and regions were significantly associated with a higher risk of low serum calcium level, and donation frequencies, gender, age and regions were significant determinants factors of odds of abnormal total serum protein.

Conclusions

Donation frequencies, gender, age, regions, and BMI showed different effects on serum calcium and total serum protein. More attention should be paid to the age, donation frequency and region of plasma donors to reduce the probability of low serum calcium and low total serum protein.

The Play of Citrate Infusion with Calcium in Plateletpheresis Donors

Citrate is the anticoagulant of choice for plateletpheresis. Citrate toxicity is common during plateletpheresis as citrate chelates calcium and causes hypocalcemia in donors. We have conducted this study to analyze the effects of routine citrate infusion during plateletpheresis on laboratory and clinical parameters. We also compared the dose of citrate delivered to donors during plateletpheresis using two different cell separators as Haemonetics MCS + and Trima Accel. The study was conducted on 50 plateletpheresis donors who were eligible for donation. Donor demographics and baseline parameters were recorded. Pre, mid and post-procedure blood samples were collected for hematological and biochemical analysis. We found a significant decrease in baseline iCa (1.23 ± 0.07 mmol/L) from start to mid-procedure (1.19 ± 0.006 mmol/L) which recovered at 30 min post procedure (1.2 ± 0.01 mmol/L). The incidence of citrate toxicity was 10%. In donors with citrate toxicity, the post-procedure recovery of iCa was not seen and there was a further decrease in iCa levels. We also found a significant fall in Hb and platelet count post plateletpheresis. We observed that lower PLT counts (< 200 × 10³/µL) necessitated higher blood volume processing and therefore a higher anticoagulant (citrate) dose. The Trima Accel cell separator reached platelet target yield faster but with a higher citrate dose as compared to Hemonetics MCS + . Ionized calcium decreases significantly during plateletpheresis but recovers soon after the completion of the procedure. Serious adverse events were not observed during plateletpheresis. The mild citrate toxicity which occurred was easily managed by slowing the procedure and administering oral calcium to donors. Trima Accel and Hemonetics MCS + both collected platelets efficiently, with minimal donor discomfort.

No association between frequent apheresis donation and risk of fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis from Sweden

BACKGROUND

Citrate anticoagulation during apheresis induces transient alterations in calcium homeostasis. It is unknown whether the repeated, transient alterations in calcium homeostasis experienced by repeated apheresis donors affects bone turnover to increase fracture risk. Our aim was to investigate the risk of osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic fracture among voluntary, frequent apheresis donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

All apheresis donors were identified from the Scandinavian Donations and Transfusions database (SCANDAT2), which includes information on over 1.6 million blood donors from Sweden and Denmark from the years 1968 and 1981, respectively. Only data from Sweden were used for these analyses. Information on fractures was obtained by linking SCANDAT2 to hospital registers. Poisson regression was used to compute incidence rate ratios of fractures in relation to the cumulative number of apheresis donations, both overall and in fixed time windows.

RESULTS

In total, 140,289 apheresis donors (67,970 women and 72,319 men) were identified from the SCANDAT2 database and were followed for up to 23 years. We observed no association between the frequency of apheresis donation and the risk of fracture either in the overall study period or during fixed-length time windows. The incidence rate ratio of fractures in donors who had made 100 or more cumulative apheresis donations was 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.06) compared with donors who had made from 9 to 24 donations. The results were similar in analyses stratified by sex and restricted to postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of an association between repeated apheresis donation and fracture risk indicates that apheresis collection is safe with regard to bone health.

Autologous blood transfusion in dogs with thoracic or abdominal hemorrhage: 25 cases (2007-2012)

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use and outcome following autologous blood transfusion (ABT) in dogs.

DESIGN

Retrospective study (January 2007-July 2012).

SETTING

Private veterinary referral center.

ANIMALS

Twenty-five dogs that underwent ABT secondary to thoracic or abdominal hemorrhage.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The hospital transaction database was searched using the keyword "autotransfusion" from January 2007 to July 2012. Data collected included signalment, body weight, etiology of hemorrhage, source and method of collection, volumes and method of ABT administration, use of anticoagulant, reported complications, and outcome. Twenty-five dogs were included for a total of 27 ABTs. Causes of hemorrhage included vascular trauma (14/25 dogs, 56%), ruptured tumor (8/25, 32%), and coagulopathy attributed to brodifacoum toxicosis (3/25, 12%). Autologous blood was collected from the abdominal (19/25, 76%), thoracic (5/25, 20%), or abdominal and thoracic cavities (1/25, 4%). Anticoagulant was added to the ABT blood in 13 of 25 (52%) cases. A median ABT volume of 29.3 mL/kg (range 2.9-406.9 mL/kg) was infused through either a 210 μm blood administration filter (21/27, 78%) or an 18 μm hemonate filter (6/27, 22%). Reported complications that may have been associated with ABT included hypocalcemia (4/17, 24%), hemolyzed serum (5/19, 26%), and prolonged coagulation times (4/5, 80%). These complications were considered of minimal clinical significance. Additional blood products were administered in 17 of 25 (68%) dogs. Seventeen (68%) dogs survived to discharge. Cause of death in the remaining cases was euthanasia or cardiac arrest secondary to uncontrollable hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

ABT is an adjunct to volume replacement in dogs with thoracic or abdominal hemorrhage secondary to vascular trauma, ruptured tumor, or anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis. ABT may be used as bridge to definitive hemorrhage control, particularly when other blood products are not available or affordable. Complications may include hypocalcemia, prolonged coagulation times, and hemolysis.

Improvement of plateletpheresis via technical modification on the MCS+

BACKGROUND

With the advantage of easy operation and high reliability, Haemonetics multicomponent collection system (MCS+) is widely used as a blood cell separator in clinical application.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of technical parameter modification as utilised on the MCS+ to improve the quality of platelet yielded as well as donor comfort.

METHODS

After informed consent, a total of 118 donors, well matched for baseline parameters, were included in the study from December 2012 to April 2013. Sixty-one donors underwent single-dose plateletpheresis (SDP), and the other 57 donors underwent double-dose plateletpheresis (DDP) before and after technical modification on the MCS+, respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The procedures were evaluated, focusing on whole blood processed (WBP), processing time (PT) and number of cycles were measured, as well as the quality of products.

RESULTS

No severe adverse reaction was found during donation. WBP, PT and number of cycles after modification were all reduced significantly in both SDP and DDP groups (P < 0·01). In addition, 80·51 % (95 in 118) of the total post-modification products were qualified, presenting with high quality. Besides, the comfort of donors was also improved probably because of the reduced PT.

CONCLUSION

Adjustment of the relevant technical parameters on MCS+ could produce a beneficial effect on the procedure measures and ensure a high-quality platelet production.

Comparative Analysis of Various Aspects of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC Cell Separator Instruments

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Fenwal Amicus and the Fresenius COM.TEC apheresis instruments regarding donor peripheral blood parameters, operational variables of the instruments, and quality control parameters of the product obtained.

METHODS

We performed 100 platelet collections from 100 voluntary donors using the 2 studied devices. We measured platelet count using an automated analyzer and analyzed the activation statuses using a flow cytometer.

RESULTS

The median time needed to perform the procedures was significantly longer with the COM.TEC. However, the product we obtained using the Amicus instrument showed higher degrees of platelet-activation. All products we obtained with both instruments had white blood cell counts of less than 5 × 10(6) per bag. We observed no statistical difference regarding collection efficiency and collection rates between the devices.

CONCLUSION

Both instruments collected platelets efficiently, with minimal donor discomfort. Compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the platelet target yield more quickly; however, it displayed an increase in platelet activation.

Frequency of adverse events in plateletpheresis donors in regional transfusion centre in North India

BACKGROUND

Although automated cell separators have undergone a lot of technical refinements, attention has been focused on the quality of platelet concentrates than on donor safety. We planned this prospective study to look into donor safety aspect by studying adverse events in normal healthy plateletpheresis donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study included 500 healthy, first-time (n=301) and repeat (n=199) plateletpheresis donors after informed consent. The plateletpheresis procedures were performed on Trima Accel (5.1 version, GAMBRO BCT) and Amicus (3.2 version FENWAL) cell separators. The adverse events during procedure were recorded and classified according to their nature. The pre and post procedure hematological and biochemical profiles of these donors were also assessed with the help of automated cell counter and analyser respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 18% (n=90) adverse events were recorded in 500 plateletpheresis donors, of which 9% of were hypocalcaemia in nature followed by hematoma (7.4%), vasovagal reaction (0.8%) and kit related adverse events in (0.8%). There was significant post procedure drop in Hb, Hct, platelet count of the donors (p<0.0001) whereas WBC count showed a statistically significant rise (p<0.0001). Divalent cations (iCa(+), TCa(+), TMg(+)) also showed a statistically significant decline after donation (p<0.0001). However there were no statistically significance difference between adverse events in Trima Accel (5.1 version, GAMBRO BCT) and Amicus (3.2 version FENWAL) cell separators.

CONCLUSION

Donor reactions can adversely affect the voluntary donor recruitment strategies to increase the public awareness regarding constant need for blood and blood products. Commonly observed adverse events in plateletpheresis donors were hypocalcemia, hematoma formation and vasovagal reactions which can be prevented by pre-donation education of the donors and change of machine configuration. Nevertheless, more prospective studies on this aspect are required in order to establish guidelines for donor safety in apheresis and also to help in assessing donor suitability, especially given the present trend of double product apheresis collections.

Donor safety in triple plateletpheresis: results from the German and Austrian Plateletpheresis Study Group multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

The objective was to investigate potential risks for apheresis donors associated with a triple-plateletpheresis (TP) program.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Eleven hemapheresis centers randomly assigned 411 repeat donors (ratio, 1:1.2) to either double plateletpheresis (DP; 185 donors) or TP (226 donors) with a platelet (PLT) target content of at least 5.0×10(11) PLTs/DP and at least 7.5×10(11) PLTs/TP. The primary endpoint was procedure-related postapheresis PLT count of at least 150×10(9) /L (probability, ≥98%). Secondary endpoints were apheresis characteristics and donor adverse reactions.

RESULTS

In 6 of 1133 DPs (0.5%) in 4 of 185 donors (2.2%) and in 20 of 1020 TPs (2.0%) in 14 of 226 donors (6.2%), postapheresis PLT counts were below 150×10(9) /L. There were marginal but significant differences in collection efficiency (DP, 69.2±9.1%; TP, 70.9±9.0%; p≤0.0001) and collection rate (DP, 10.4×10(9) ±2.3×10(9) PLTs/min; TP, 10.8×10(9) ±2.3×10(9) PLTs/min; p≤0.005). The PLT yields were 5.9×10(11) ±0.8×10(11) PLTs for DP and 8.3×10(11) ±0.9×10(11) PLT for TP (p≤0.0001) at processing times of 59±13 minutes (DP) versus 80±16 minutes (TP; p≤0.0001). Significant PLT recruitment (1.10±0.14 vs. 1.20±0.23; p<0.0001) was seen for both DP and TP. DP and TP did not differ with regard to venous access problems (VAPs) without discontinuation (3.8% for both), but DP induced fewer VAPs with discontinuation (1.1% vs. 3.0%; p<0.01). Mild citrate toxicity (1.7% vs. 3.9%; p<0.01) and circulatory reactions (0.4% vs. 2.2%; p<0.01) were more often noticed in TP, but caused no increase in discontinuations.

CONCLUSIONS

TP results in an increase in mild donor reactions but does not significantly impair donor safety or product quality.

Gewinnung, Herstellung und Lagerung von Blut und Blutkomponenten

Blutspender leisten einen wertvollen Dienst für die Gemeinschaft: Die ständige Verfügbarkeit von Blutkomponenten ist zur unverzichtbaren Voraussetzung für viele Bereiche der Medizin geworden. Nicht nur die Gewinnung und Aufarbeitung von Blut und Blutbestandteilen zur Sicherstellung einer qualitativ wie quantitativ guten Versorgung, sondern auch die kompetente Betreuung der Spender ist eine der großen Aufgaben der Transfusionsmedizin.

Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators

SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: A variety of apheresis devices are now available on the market for plateletapheresis. We compared two apheresis instruments (Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC) with regard to processing time, platelet (PLT) yield and efficiency, and white blood cell (WBC) content. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Donors undergoing plateletpheresis were randomly separated into two groups (either the Amicus or the COM.TEC cell separator). RESULTS: In the pre-apheresis setting, 32 plateletpheresis procedures performed with each instrument revealed no significant differences in donors' sex, age, weight, height and total blood volume between the two groups. However, the pre-apheresis PLT count was higher with the COM.TEC than with the Amicus (198 × 10(3)/μl vs. 223 × 10(3)/μl; p = 0.035). The blood volume processed to reach a target PLT yield of ≥3.3 × 10(11) was higher in the COM.TEC compared to the Amicus (3,481 vs. 2,850 ml; p < 0.001). The median separation time was also significantly longer in the COM.TEC than in the Amicus (61 vs. 44 min; p < 0.001). 91 and 88% of the PLT products collected with the Amicus and the COM.TEC, respectively, had a PLT count of >3.3 × 10(11) (p = 0.325). All products obtained with both instruments had WBC counts lower than 5 ↔ 10(6), as required. There was no statistical difference with regard to collection efficiency between the devices (55 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 15%; p = 0.477). However, the collection rate was significantly higher with the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC instrument (0.077 ± 0.012 × 10(11) vs. 0.057 ± 0.008 × 10(11) PLT/min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both instruments collected platelets efficiently. Additionally, consistent leukoreduction was obtained with both instruments; however, compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the PLT target yield more quickly.

Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fresenius AS.TEC 204 and Haemonetics MCS 3p

This is an attempt at comparing two cell separators for plateletpheresis, namely the Fresenius AS.TEC 204 and Haemonetics MCS 3p, at a tertiary care center in India. Donors who weighed between 55-75 kg, who had a hematocrit of 41-43%, and platelet counts of 250x10(3)-400x10(3)/microl were selected for the study. The comparability of the donors who donated on the two cell separators were analysed by t-test independent samples and no significant differences were found (P>0.05). The features compared were time taken for the procedure, volume processed on the separators, adverse reactions of the donors, quality control of the product, separation efficiency of the separators, platelet loss in the donors after the procedure, and the predictor versus the actual yield of platelets given by the cell separator. The volume processed to get a target yield of >3x10(11) was equal to 2.8-3.2 l and equal in both the cell separators. Symptoms of citrate toxicity were seen in 4 and 2.5% of donors who donated on the MCS 3p and the AS.TEC 204, respectively, and 3 and 1% of donors, respectively, had vasovagal reactions. All the platelet products collected had a platelet count of >3x10(11); 90% of the platelet products collected on the AS.TEC 204 attained the predicted yield that was set on the cell separator where as 75% of the platelet products collected on the MCS 3p attained the target yield. Quality control of the platelets collected on both the cell separators complied with the standards except that 3% of the platelets collected on the MCS 3p had a visible red cell contamination. The separation efficiency of the MCS 3p was higher, 50-52% as compared to the 40-45% on the AS.TEC 204. A provision of double venous access, less adverse reactions, negligible RBC contamination with a better predictor yield of platelets makes the AS.TEC 204 a safer and more reliable alternative than the widely used Haemonetics MCS 3p.

Prospective evaluation of double RBC collection using three different apheresis systems

BACKGROUND

Automated component collection systems offer the possibility of increasing blood supply and improving transfusion safety.

DESIGN

30 blood donors were randomly assigned to double RBC collection with either the Baxter Alyx (AX), the Haemonetics MCS Plus (MCS+), or the Gambro Trima Accel (TA). Procedures were prospectively evaluated focussing on yield, time, efficiency, citrate donor load, and in vitro quality.

RESULTS

All units showed sufficient in vitro quality throughout 42 days of storage and complied with international requirements. Donor reactions were limited to mild citrate reactions. AX was the fastest and most efficient system* * (* *p approximately 0.001) attaining the highest yield* * from similar amounts of whole blood. The drawbacks were a higher RBC loss* (*p < 0.05) and accelerated citrate infusion* *. Due to lower collection rates* * * (* * *p < 0.001), MCS+ was slower than TA* * * but compensated with lower citrate load * * *.

CONCLUSION

Double RBC apheresis was performed safely and efficiently with all three instruments. AX had advantages for most parameters evaluated.

Hematomas in multicomponent apheresis: searching for related factors

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify donation variables that could be related to the development of hematoma during multicomponent apheresis collections (MACs).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study where 1375 donors donated 5177 MACs during a 2-year period with two different machines (Amicus Crescendo [AC], Baxter Healthcare Corp.; and Trima Accel [TA], Gambro BCT). Variable data were recorded prospectively. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, generalized estimating equations were used with an exchangeable correlation matrix to take into account the nonindependence of several measurements from the same donor.

RESULTS

During the study period, 170 procedures failed due to hematoma (3.3%). Several variables were related to hematoma development in the adjusted model: operator experience (less than 500 procedures supervised vs. more; odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.31), previous apheresis donations (first time vs. more than 16 donations; OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.52-5.45), vein canalized (basilic vs. intermediate antebrachial or cephalic; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.94), diastolic blood pressure (units divided by 10 mmHg; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94), and type of machine used (TA high return limit configuration [RLC] setting configuration vs. AC; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.27-2.96; TA low RLC setting configuration vs. AC; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.83-1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that hematoma in MAC is not a random event. Appropriate machine configuration in the TA could reduce the hematoma rate to a level comparable with that of the AC. Operator training and donor blood pressure are also interesting variables for study because these could be modified to reduce the hematoma rate.

Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators

BACKGROUND

The Baxter Amicus Version 2.51 (A) and the Gambro BCT Trima Accel Version 5.0 (T) cell separators may produce multiple platelet (PLT) concentrates within a single donation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The single-needle multiple plateletpheresis procedures of the two devices were compared in a prospective, randomized, paired crossover study in 60 donors. The 120 donations were compared for donor comfort, collection efficiency, residual white blood cell (WBC) count, and (in selected patients) corrected count increment (CCI).

RESULTS

The mean PLT yield and the resultant mean number of units per donation were significantly lower for A (6.06 x 10(11) vs. 7.48 x 10(11) and 2.57 vs. 3.19, respectively, both p < 0.001), in spite of a longer apheresis duration (89 min vs. 79 min; p < 0.001). This resulted in a higher collection rate of T (5.68 x 10(11) PLTs/hr vs. 4.10 x 10(11) PLTs/hr, p < 0.001). Residual WBC count of every unit was fewer than 5 x 10(6), but significantly fewer A-PLT donations contained more than 10(5) WBCs per unit (1 vs. 9, p = 0.008). Although the ACD-A consumption was slightly higher for A (489 mL vs. 469 mL, p = 0.04), a trend to a higher frequency of side effects was found for T (42.4% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.06). The 1-hour CCIs of 33 transfused A-PLT units were comparable with those of 43 T-PLT units (11.8 vs. 13.9, p = 0.480).

CONCLUSIONS

Both cell separators showed safe collections of up to 4 PLT units per donation with adequate CCI. T produced a higher PLT yield despite shorter apheresis duration, but with slightly higher residual WBC counts and a trend to a higher side-effect frequency.

Prospective comparison of high-dose plateletpheresis with the latest apheresis systems on the same donors

BACKGROUND

To improve productivity of automated platelet (PLT) collection, the industry has introduced new instruments or modifications to existing equipment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

With the same 8 donors for double (DDC) and triple-dose PLT collection (TDC), the Baxter Amicus (AM), the Haemonetics MCS Plus (MCS+), and the Gambro Trima Accel (TA) were evaluated focusing on yield, duration, and citrate donor load. Target endpoints were set at 5.5 x 10(11) to 6.0 x 10(11) PLTs (DDC) and 7.5 x 10(11) to 8.0 x 10(11) PLTs (TDC) in up to 100 and 120 minutes' donation time, respectively.

RESULTS

TA was the most efficient system (74.5 +/- 3.9%) with significant differences from AM (71.1 +/- 3.9%; p = 0.028) and MCS+ (64.0 +/- 7.7%; p = 0.002). TA had advantages over AM for collection rate (10.9 x 10(9) +/- 2.2 x 10(9) vs. 10.1 x 10(9) +/- 1.5 x 10(9) PLTs/min; p = 0.382), whole blood processed (3928 +/- 611 mL vs. 4219 +/- 727 mL; p = 0.382), and time to obtain an established standard dose (TSD 2.5(EU), 30.2 +/- 5.6 vs. 37.7 +/- 5.5 min; TSD 3.5(US), 42.2 +/- 7.8 min vs. 52.7 +/- 7.7 min; p = 0.015), whereas AM was slightly superior in PLT yield (2.81 x 10(11) +/- 0.21 x 10(11) vs. 2.76 x 10(11) +/- 0.31 x 10(11)/unit; p = 0.645). Owing to the lowest draw (42.3 +/- 3.2 mL/min; p < 0.001) and collection rates (6.0 x 10(11) +/- 1.5 x 10(11)/min; p = 0.021), MCS+ was the slowest significantly (p < 0.001) but compensated with fewer citrate reactions owing to lower citrate infusion rates (0.78 +/- 0.11 mL/min/L; p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

High-dose plateletpheresis was performed efficiently and safely with all three instruments. AM had advantages in PLT yield, and MCS+, in donor comfort. TA was the fastest in obtaining an established standard dose and, because of this advantage, the machine with the highest practical impact in routine use.

Evaluation of concurrent collection of in-line filtered platelets and packed red blood cells by multicomponent apheresis with three last-generation apparatuses

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Multicomponent apheresis enables the collection and procession of different blood products in a single donation. Different apparatuses vary in terms of principle and efficiency. Knowledge of them is essential to analyse cost effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 donors, well matched for baseline parameters, were randomly assigned to the concurrent collection of red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets (PLTs) with the Baxter Amicus (AM), the Haemonetics MCS plus (MCS+), and the Gambro Trima Accel (TA). The procedures were prospectively evaluated, focusing on yield, time, efficiency, citrate donor load and in vitro quality.

RESULTS

PLT yield (x 10(11)/unit; mean +/- standard deviation) was 3.09 +/- 0.34 (AM), 2.53 +/- 0.35 (MCS+), 2.51 +/- 0.32 (TA). Absolute RBC mass (ml/unit; mean +/- standard deviation) was 177.4 +/- 2.7 (AM), 161.5 +/- 0.7 (MCS+), and 163.7 +/- 5.4 (TA). The programmed RBC collection target of 160-180 ml was reached by all instruments, whereas the programmed PLT yield of 3.0 x 10(11) was met satisfactorily by AM only. All units contained < 1 x 10(6) WBCs. In vitro RBC quality was equivalent among the systems. No significant differences were noted with collection efficiency, processed whole blood or citrate donor load. Owing to high collection and draw rates, the TA was the fastest of all the systems. The MCS+ had the longest donation/needle time and the highest PLT activation, but compensated with significantly lower draw and citrate infusion rates. The overall processing time was longest with the AM, as a result of manual procedures from donor disconnection to the final products.

CONCLUSIONS

Multicomponent apheresis was performed safely and efficiently with all three instruments. There was no 'magic apparatus' as each system combined advantages and pitfalls for the diverse parameters evaluated.

What’s happening: An overview of potential adverse reactions associated with apheresis technology

The current status of potential adverse reactions associated with the use of apheresis technology is reviewed, focussing on three main areas: adverse events related to component collection, progenitor cells collection and therapeutic apheresis. Based on available information it is believed that apheresis technologies are safe and increasingly used in transfusion medicine, including in auto-transfusion and different types of therapy. Occasionally, however, for various donor/patient and operational reasons, mild or moderate adverse reactions do occur. The majority of these reactions are related to vascular access and anticoagulants used, which can be mostly eliminated with calcium/magnesium administration. The reactions associated with therapeutic apheresis are more frequent (6.75%) than the multi-components and stem cell collections. Most of these reactions are generally mild and only 0.89% has been classified as severe. A national registry of donor adverse reactions as well as a planned haemovigilance system may prove helpful in identifying the potential causes which might be associated with either to donor/donation and/or with a particular technology or procedure.

A randomized crossover trial comparing three plateletpheresis machines

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare three different apheresis machines with the same donors regarding the processing time required to obtain a 3.5 x 10(11) platelet (PLT) dose and acceptance by donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A randomized crossover trial was performed to evaluate the differences between the Amicus Crescendo (Baxter Biotech Corp.), the MCS Plus (Haemonetics Corp.), and the Trima Accel (Gambro BCT). Donations from 51 donors were compared for time adjusted to obtain a standard 3.5 x 10(11) PLT dose (TSD3.5), efficiency, adverse reactions, yield, leukodepletion, machine accuracy, and donor preferences. Processing times were measured by chronometer. The same vein access was used during all three processes in each donor. In the statistical analysis, to take into account the nonindependence of several measurements from the same donor, generalized estimating equations were used with an autoregressive correlation matrix.

RESULTS

The Accel produced a TSD3.5 (mean +/- SEM) of 47.9 +/- 1.0 min; the Amicus, 60.3 +/- 1.0 min; and the MCS Plus, 66.7 +/- 1.0 (p < 0.0001). The Amicus presented the greatest efficiency (87.5%; p < 0.0028). The MCS Plus demonstrated the highest capacity for leukodepletion (p < 0.0002) despite one process presenting more than 1 x 10(6) white blood cells per unit. The MCS Plus also measured the processing time with the greatest accuracy. No severe adverse effects were observed. The donors preferred the Accel (61%) followed by the Amicus (35%) and the MCS Plus (4%; p < 0.0001) and the processing speed was the most highly valued measure (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Accel is the fastest and, because of this advantage, the machine preferred by donors. The Amicus was the most efficient and the MCS Plus was the only one not to underestimate the processing time.

First comparison of productivity and citrate donor load between the Trima version 4 (dual-stage filler) and the Trima Accel (single-stage filler) in the same donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Aside from new software the blood cell separator TRIMA (GambroBCT) also received a newly designed separation chamber offering a novel single stage separation technology, called Trima Accel. We evaluated this new system focusing on productivity and donor comfort by comparing it to the previous version (Trima version 4) in collecting single-donor platelet concentrates (SD-PCs) and plasma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each of 20 donors underwent platelet apheresis using both devices. We compared the collection efficiency (CE), the collections rate (CR), the volume of the collected plasma and the residual leukocytes. Furthermore we compared donor comfort in terms of duration of the donation, flow of citrate back to the donor and platelet and white blood cell (WBC) loss.

RESULTS

While the number of collected platelets and the platelet concentration did not differ significantly between both techniques the time of the procedure was reduced by 15.6% with Trima Accel. This results in an increase of the CR and CE of 25% and 15% respectively when using Trima Accel. Log normal probability plotting of WBC counts showed that both techniques complied with the European and the US leukoreduction guidelines. The mean flow of ACDA to the donor per minute and per litre blood volume was also reduced by 20%.

CONCLUSION

These data show that the Trima Accel represents a further improvement in apheresis platelet production with a better productivity and donor comfort, especially regarding the mean flow of ACDA to the donor.