Nucleic acid amplification technology methods used in blood donor screening

Detection of the serological markers hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core IgM antibody (anti-HBcIgM) in the diagnosis of acute hepatitis B virus infection after recent exposure

The serological diagnosis of acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after recent exposure has been established by the hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-hepatitis B core IgM antibody (anti-HBcIgM) detection in serum, sometimes accompanied by the detection of hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg). Despite this characteristic serological profile, misdiagnosis can occur in cases of unexpected or atypical behavior of the serological markers in the bloodstream, or if the true meaning of its expression is not properly investigated, or even if there is a possibility of interference from factors not necessarily linked to the infectious process, in the detection of these markers. This review discusses the influence of these variables on laboratory results for these two serological markers and, therefore, the potential risk of these variables compromising the correct diagnosis of acute infection after recent HBV exposure.

Dynamic profile of the HBeAg-anti-HBe system in acute and chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A clinical-laboratory approach

Wild-type HBV infection is followed by the blood expression of its widely known serological markers of infection, and designated as, hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and its antibody (anti-HBs), anti-HBc antibodies (IgM/IgG), and hepatitis B virus 'e' antigen (HBeAg) and its antibody (anti-HBe). These markers are detected as the infection develops and its kinetic behavior serves as a basis for monitoring the disorder and for diagnosing the clinical form or infection phase. Among these, the HBeAg-anti-HBe system markers demonstrate a dynamic profile whose interpretation, both in the acute or chronic HBV infection context, can offer greater difficulty to the health professionals, due to its particularities. This review offers a revisit to the markers dynamics of this system in the acute and chronic HBV infection and to the clinical and laboratory significance of its expression in these two clinical contexts.

The serological markers of acute infection with hepatitis A, B, C, D, E and G viruses revisited

Viral hepatitis is a liver infection caused by one of the six hepatitis viruses: hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, and G virus (HAV to HEV and HGV). These agents differ in their biological, immunological, pathological and epidemiological characteristics. They cause infections that, when symptomatic, lead to clinical manifestations and laboratory findings that are not specific to a particular virus, often making differential diagnosis difficult, especially when no knowledge is available regarding the patient's medical history or the epidemiological background. A number of acute-phase serological markers, such as anti-HAV, anti-HBc, anti-HDV and anti-HEV IgM antibodies, are able to provide a clear indication of an infection caused by HAV, HBV, HDV or HEV. Anti-HCV antibodies and HGV/RNA are used for the diagnosis of HCV and HGV infections. The importance of each of these markers will be reviewed, and different factors that can interfere with the diagnosis of acute infections caused by these viruses will be described.

Molecular mechanisms underlying HBsAg negativity in occult HBV infection

Although genomic detection is considered the gold standard test on HBV infection identification, the HBsAg investigation is still the most frequent clinical laboratory request to diagnose HBV infection in activity. However, the non-detection of HBsAg in the bloodstream of chronic or acutely infected individuals has been a phenomenon often observed in clinical practice, despite the high sensitivity and specificity of screening assays standardized commercially and adopted in routine. The expansion of knowledge about the hepatitis B virus biology (replication/life cycle, genetic variability/mutability/heterogeneity), their biochemical and immunological properties (antigenicity and immunogenicity), in turn, has allowed to elucidate some mechanisms that may explain the occurrence of this phenomenon. Therefore, the negativity for HBsAg during the acute or chronic infection course may become a fragile or at least questionable result. This manuscript discusses some mechanisms that could explain the negativity for HBsAg in a serological profile of individuals with HBV infection in activity, or factors that could compromise its detection in the bloodstream during HBV infection.

[Sensitivity of the COBAS AmpliScreen™ HIV-1 test v1.5 for HIV-1 detection]

The introduction of nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) in blood banks was intended to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. Co-circulation of a great diversity of HIV-1 variants in Argentina portrays the need to assess the sensitivity of serological and molecular assays available for their detection. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity of the COBAS AmpliScreen™ HIV-1 Test, version 1.5 (Roche) for the detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma samples of infected individuals from Argentina. The results of this study reveal that this technique has high sensitivity for the detection of HIV-1 RNA under assay conditions: using mini-pool testing, pools ≥ 50 RNA copies per ml achieved ≥ 92 % sensitivity, whereas in the standard procedure, samples ≥ 207 RNA copies/ml achieved 100 % sensitivity. Moreover, the COBAS AmpliScreen™ HIV-1 Test, version 1.5 (Roche) is suitable for detecting prevailing HIV-1 variants.

Direct detection of bacterial genomic DNA at sub-femtomolar concentrations using single molecule arrays

We report a method for the sensitive measurement of genomic DNA based on the direct detection of single molecules of DNA in arrays of femtoliter wells. The method begins by generating short fragments of DNA from large, double-stranded molecules of genomic DNA using either restriction enzymes or sonication. Single-stranded fragments are then generated by melting the duplex, and these fragments are hybridized to complementary biotinylated detection probes and capture probes on paramagnetic beads. The resulting DNA complexes are then labeled with an enzyme (streptavidin-β-galactosidase), and single enzymes associated with these complexes on beads are detected in single molecule arrays (Simoa). DNA concentration is quantified by determining the average number of enzymes per bead via Poisson statistics (digital) or the average bead intensity (analog). The Simoa DNA assay was used to detect genomic DNA purified from S. aureus with an average limit of detection (LOD) of 0.07 fM, or 2100 DNA molecules per 50 μL sample. We used this assay to detect S. aureus spiked into (a) whole blood, with an average LOD of 1100 bacteria per 25 μL sample (0.074 fM), and (b) water from the Charles River, with an LOD of 1300 bacteria per 50 μL sample (0.042 fM). Bacteria were detected in river water without prior purification of DNA. The Simoa DNA assay, which directly detects target DNA molecules without molecular replication, is an attractive alternative to existing sensitive DNA detection technologies that rely on amplification using polymerases, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

New Strategies for Blood Donor Screening for Hepatitis B Virus

Serologic testing for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) has historically been the foundation of blood screening, while HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was recently developed to detect HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-negative blood units donated during early acute infection. Comparison data on seroconversion panels using HBsAg assays of varying sensitivities and pooled- or single-sample NAT, along with viral load estimates corresponding to HBsAg assay detection limits, have provided information on the theoretical benefits of NAT relative to HBsAg. Model-derived estimates have generally been predictive of the yields of DNA-positive, HBsAg-negative window period blood units detected in a number of studies from Europe, Japan, and the US. Studies indicate that the added benefit of pooled-sample NAT is relatively small in areas of low endemicity, with greater yields in areas highly endemic for HBV. Single-sample NAT would offer more significant early window period closure and could prevent a moderate number of residual HBV transmissions not detected by HBsAg assays; however, no fully automated single-sample HBV NAT systems are currently available.Even single-sample HBV NAT may not substitute for anti-HBc screening, as indicated by studies of donors with isolated anti-HBc who have extremely low DNA levels undetectable by standard single-sample NAT and who have been associated with transfusion-transmitted HBV. Moreover, HBsAg testing may still be needed even in the setting of combined anti-HBc and NAT screening. HBsAg-positive units from donors in the chronic stage of infection may contain very low or intermittently detectable DNA levels that single-sample NAT would miss. Although such donors are usually anti-HBc reactive and would be interdicted by anti-HBc screening, some lack anti-HBc. Extensive parallel testing will be needed to determine whether single-sample NAT in combination with anti-HBc might be sufficient to detect all the infectious donors currently interdicted by HBsAg testing. In countries that do not screen for anti-HBc, HBsAg testing would be the only means of detecting donations from chronically infected individuals with low/intermittently detectable DNA, since even single-donor NAT would not identify these potentially infectious blood units. In the future, the current fully automated HBsAg assays may incorporate significant sensitivity improvements, and automated single-sample HBV NAT may become a reality. Each country will need to develop its blood screening strategy based on HBV endemicity, yields of infectious units detected by different serologic/NAT screening methods, and cost effectiveness of test methods in ensuring blood safety.

Genomic detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by nucleic acid amplification test in a frequent platelet donor during the pre-seroconversion period

Since serological donor-screening tests for HIV were introduced in 1985, the safety of donated blood components has improved dramatically. However, these tests do not completely prevent the risk of transfusion-associated HIV infection related to the use of blood donated during the pre-seroconversion window period. Testing based on nucleic acid amplification is being implemented to screen for HIV-infected blood donated during this period, which has reduced the probability of transmitting HIV through transfusion by shortening the window period. This article describes a case of acute HIV-1 infection, detected using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) in a repeat blood donor who donated during the pre-seroconversion window period and whose antigen and anti-HIV antibody expression was observed after molecular marker detection. In addition, the possible route of infection is discussed based on the patient's history, and finally, the need for NAT technology for blood donor screening is emphasized.

Nucleic acid assay system for tier II laboratories and moderately complex clinics to detect HIV in low-resource settings

There is a clear need for an instrument-free molecular diagnostic system for detecting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA or DNA that can be used in developing countries. Such a test could be used for early diagnosis of HIV-1 infection during infancy and could serve as a surrogate end point for vaccine trials. We developed the IsoAmp HIV-1 assay (BioHelix Corporation), which targets the HIV-1 gag gene with use of isothermal reverse-transcription helicase-dependent amplification chemistry. The IsoAmp HIV assay uses a disposable amplicon containment device with an embedded vertical-flow DNA detection strip to detect the presence of HIV-1 amplicons. The vertical-flow DNA detection strip has a control line to validate the performance of the device and a test line to detect the analyte. The analyte is detected by a sandwich immunoassay for reporter moieties on a capture probe and a detection probe. The control line consists of the detection probe reporter moiety conjugated to the vertical-flow DNA detection strip. The preliminary limit of detection of the IsoAmp HIV assay was evaluated by testing serial dilutions of HIV-1 armored RNA (Assuragen). We found that 21 (75%) of 28 assays yielded positive results when 50 copies of HIV-1 armored RNA were input into the IsoAmp HIV reaction.

Ultra-high-throughput, automated nucleic acid detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) for infant infection diagnosis using the Gen-Probe Aptima HIV-1 screening assay

The early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in infants is critical to ensure the initiation of treatment before significant immunological compromise. Each year an estimated 300,000 HIV-exposed infants in South Africa require access to tests for the diagnosis of HIV infection. Currently, testing is performed at several facilities by using PCR amplification of HIV DNA at 6 weeks of age by the use of dried blood spots (DBSs) and whole blood (WB). The Gen-Probe Aptima HIV type 1 (HIV-1) screening assay (the Aptima assay) is a qualitative nucleic acid test based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), a technology routinely used in blood banks in South Africa. The performance characteristics of Gen-Probe's TMA technology compared well to those of the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 DNA (version 1.5) assay. The sensitivity of the assay with WB and DBS samples was 100%, and the specificities were 99.4% and 99.5% for DBSs and WB, respectively. The detection of HIV by the Aptima assay at greater levels of dilution in samples negative by the comparator assay indicates an improvement in sensitivity by the use of the TMA technology. The ability to process 1,900 samples in a 24-h period on the Tigris instrument makes the Aptima assay an attractive option for high-volume, centralized laboratories.

A novel diagnostic target in the hepatitis C virus genome

BACKGROUND

Detection and quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is integral to diagnostic and therapeutic regimens. All molecular assays target the viral 5'-noncoding region (5'-NCR), and all show genotype-dependent variation of sensitivities and viral load results. Non-western HCV genotypes have been under-represented in evaluation studies. An alternative diagnostic target region within the HCV genome could facilitate a new generation of assays.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In this study we determined by de novo sequencing that the 3'-X-tail element, characterized significantly later than the rest of the genome, is highly conserved across genotypes. To prove its clinical utility as a molecular diagnostic target, a prototype qualitative and quantitative test was developed and evaluated multicentrically on a large and complete panel of 725 clinical plasma samples, covering HCV genotypes 1-6, from four continents (Germany, UK, Brazil, South Africa, Singapore). To our knowledge, this is the most diversified and comprehensive panel of clinical and genotype specimens used in HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) validation to date. The lower limit of detection (LOD) was 18.4 IU/ml (95% confidence interval, 15.3-24.1 IU/ml), suggesting applicability in donor blood screening. The upper LOD exceeded 10(-9) IU/ml, facilitating viral load monitoring within a wide dynamic range. In 598 genotyped samples, quantified by Bayer VERSANT 3.0 branched DNA (bDNA), X-tail-based viral loads were highly concordant with bDNA for all genotypes. Correlation coefficients between bDNA and X-tail NAT, for genotypes 1-6, were: 0.92, 0.85, 0.95, 0.91, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively; X-tail-based viral loads deviated by more than 0.5 log10 from 5'-NCR-based viral loads in only 12% of samples (maximum deviation, 0.85 log10). The successful introduction of X-tail NAT in a Brazilian laboratory confirmed the practical stability and robustness of the X-tail-based protocol. The assay was implemented at low reaction costs (US$8.70 per sample), short turnover times (2.5 h for up to 96 samples), and without technical difficulties.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates a way to fundamentally improve HCV viral load monitoring and infection screening. Our prototype assay can serve as a template for a new generation of viral load assays. Additionally, to our knowledge this study provides the first open protocol to permit industry-grade HCV detection and quantification in resource-limited settings.

Development and evaluation of a sensitive enzyme-linked oligonucleotide-sorbent assay for detection of polymerase chain reaction-amplified hepatitis C virus of genotypes 1-6

A high-throughput polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based enzyme-linked oligonucleotide-sorbent assay (ELOSA) was developed for use in the diagnostic testing of serum from patients who may be infected with different hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. Twelve genotype-specific 5'-aminated DNA-coated probes were designed based on the variable 5'-untranslated region sequences of the HCV genotypes 1-6. Using 100 clinical serum samples, the performance of the PCR-ELOSA method was compared with Roche's COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor V2.0 assay and the VERSANT HCV genotype assay (LiPA), and the overall agreement was 99% at the level of HCV genotypes with a detection range of 2.0 x 10(2) to 1.0 x 10(7)IU/ml for PCR-ELOSA. The PCR-ELOSA was more comprehensive as demonstrated by the fact that approximately 20% of the samples with different subtypes could be discriminated by this method but not by LiPA. In addition, the PCR-ELOSA system showed high accuracy (CV<or=6.36%) and even higher reproducibility (CV<or=5.55%). Thus, this novel PCR-ELOSA system provides a sensitive and versatile alternative to current HCV detection assays.

Reducing the risk of transfusion-transmissible viral infection through blood donor selection: the Australian experience 2000 through 2006

BACKGROUND

Selection of voluntary donors who are at low risk of transfusion-transmissible viral infection (TTVI) is central in maintaining the safety of the blood supply. Evaluation of its effectiveness and the dynamics of the process may offer opportunities to further improve transfusion safety.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The impact of donor selection on prevalence of TTVI was analyzed in all allogeneic donations in Australia between July 2000 and June 2006 by interviewing donors found to have a TTVI. The presence and disclosure of infective risks was reassessed.

RESULTS

A total of 6.3 million donations were tested; of these, 1,449 (0.02%) were repeat-reactive for a TTVI and were discarded. This comprised 605 (42%) positive for the presence of hepatitis B, 818 (56%) positive for the presence of hepatitis C, 18 (1%) positive for the presence of human immunodeficiency virus, and 20 (1%) positive for the presence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus-I and/or -II (HTLV-I/II). This prevalence was 50 to 350 times lower than in the Australian population. In 1,158 cases (80%), an infective risk was identified; 509 donors (44%) had more than one. The most common identified were country of birth and parental ethnicity (n = 682, 26% of risks), tattoos and/or piercings (n = 448, 18%), and intravenous drug use (n = 302, 12%). In 302 cases (21%) disclosure at predonation screening would have resulted in deferral. Factors influencing nondisclosure included temporal remoteness and perceptions that laboratory testing rendered disclosure unnecessary.

CONCLUSION

These findings affirm the effectiveness of current stringent donor selection criteria in reducing the residual risk of TTVI. Ongoing donor education regarding the importance of risk disclosure is required.

HIV-1, HCV and HBV seronegative window reduction by the new Roche cobas® TaqScreen MPX test in seroconverting donors

BACKGROUND

By shortening the pre-seroconversion window in the viral screening of donated blood, nucleic acid amplification testing greatly improves safety and efficiency, particularly when combined with multiple target detection and maximal automation.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of seronegative window reduction during HIV-1, HCV and HBV infection by the novel cobas TaqScreen MPX test for simultaneous nucleic acid detection of HIV-1 (groups M and O), HIV-2, HCV and HBV using the cobas s 201 system.

STUDY DESIGN

Testing of HIV-1, HCV, and HBV seroconversion panels (20 each) using the cobas TaqScreen MPX test versus reference immuno- and nucleic acid technology assays.

RESULTS

The cobas TaqScreen MPX test detected HIV-1 and HCV infection earlier than immunoassays in 20/20 and 19/20 panels, and HBV DNA earlier than or on the same day as HBsAg in 19/20 and 18/20 panels, and later in 1 and 2 panels on neat samples and 1:6 dilutions. Pre-seroconversion sensitivity exceeded that of COBAS AmpliScreen testing in pools of 24.

CONCLUSION

The cobas TaqScreen MPX test shortens the pre-seroconversion window in minipools of six, evidencing high sensitivity, and significantly enhances blood-screening efficiency by the simultaneous automated detection of multiple viruses in a single test.

Correlates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA negativity among HCV-seropositive blood donors

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20 percent of persons infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) clear viremia. Factors associated with resolution of viremia are not well defined. Implementation of routine nucleic acid testing (NAT) of blood donors has yielded a large data set for analysis of demographic correlates of resolved viremia.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HCV antibody and NAT data, liver enzyme (alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) results, and donor demographic characteristics were compiled for 2,579,290 allogeneic donations given at five large blood centers after NAT implementation in 1999 through December 2001. Donation HCV RNA status was compared between first-time donors categorized by ALT levels, sex, age, race and/or ethnicity, country of birth, level of education, blood center location, and blood group, with chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression methods.

RESULTS

Of 35 confirmed-seropositive repeat donors, 19 (54.3%) tested negative for the presence of HCV RNA; there was no association between RNA status and preseroconversion intervals (p = 0.74). Of 2105 RIBA-positive, first-time donors, 402 (19.1%) tested negative for the presence of HCV RNA by NAT (presumptive resolved infections). There were significant differences in the frequency of RNA negativity among first-time donors categorized by ALT levels and by race and/or ethnicity. ALT levels were more likely to be elevated in RNA-positive, first-time donors (p < 0.0001). Viremia was less likely to resolve in Asian (8.2%) and black non-Hispanic (14.4%) donors than in white non-Hispanic (20.7%), Hispanic (22.1%), and other race and/or ethnicity (22.1%) donors (p = 0.02). No significant associations were found for age, sex, country of origin, level of education, blood type, and donor center location.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that the frequency of HCV RNA negativity among seropositive persons differs by race and/or ethnicity. Follow-up studies of donors with resolved viremia are warranted to further elucidate viral, immunologic, and genetic factors underlying spontaneous viral clearance.

Relative sensitivities of licensed nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of viremia in early human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND

Screening donors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is primarily performed on minipools (MPs) with one of two commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT; Roche Molecular Systems; or Gen-Probe/Chiron). We compared these assays with respect to detection of RNA in early HIV and HCV infection.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twelve HIV plasma donor panels (116 serial samples) and 12 HCV panels (180 serial samples) were selected to optimally represent early viremia. Initial testing was performed in singlicate or triplicate on separately coded aliquots, both neat and at dilutions corresponding to MP screening (1:16 for Gen-Probe; 1:24 for Roche); 20 additional replicates were performed when discordant results were observed. Odds ratios (ORs) comparing detection of RNA by different assays were derived with logistic regression models. Differences in window-period closure and yields of assays in MP or individual-donation (ID) format were estimated.

RESULTS

Differences in detection rates between Roche and Gen-Probe NAT assays were small and only observed with samples with very-low-level viremia. ORs for detecting RNA by the Gen-Probe versus the Roche assay were significant for HIV if conducted on MPs (1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.5) but not neat (1.0; 95% CI, 0.72-1.4). Odds of detecting HCV RNA were higher if the Gen-Probe assay was conducted either neat (2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.2) or on MPs (4.0; 95% CI, 2.8-5.8). These differences translated to <1 day window-period closure and

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in sensitivities of licensed NAT assays for HIV and HCV are very small and clinically insignificant, particularly when compared to differences of MP versus ID NAT screening.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Blood Banking/methods
• HIV/genetics
• HIV/isolation & purification
• HIV Infections/blood
• HIV Infections/diagnosis
• Hepacivirus/genetics
• Hepacivirus/isolation & purification
• Hepatitis C/blood
• Hepatitis C/diagnosis
• Humans
• Licensure
• Mass Screening/methods
• Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods
• RNA, Viral/blood
• RNA, Viral/isolation & purification
• Sensitivity and Specificity
• Viremia/blood
• Viremia/diagnosis

Collapse

Grants

• N01-HB-47114 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HB-97077 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HB-97078 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HB-97079 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HB-97080 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HB-97081 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HB-97082 NHLBI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Michael P Busch Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94118, USA.
Simone A Glynn
David J Wright
Dale Hirschkorn
Megan E Laycock
Joan McAuley
Yongling Tu
Cristina Giachetti
James Gallarda
John Heitman
Steven H Kleinman

Collapse

Analytical and clinical sensitivity of West Nile virus RNA screening and supplemental assays available in 2003

BACKGROUND

Transfusion-transmitted West Nile virus (WNV) infections were first reported in 2002, which led to rapid development of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT). A study was conducted to evaluate sensitivities of WNV screening and supplemental NAT assays first employed in 2003.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-five member-coded panels were distributed to NAT assay manufacturers. Panels included five pedigreed WNV standards (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 copies/mL), 15 or 16 donor units with very-low-level viremia identified through 2003 screening, and four or five negative control samples. Samples were tested neat in 10 replicates by all assays; for NAT screening assays, 10 replicates were also performed on dilutions consistent with minipool (MP)-NAT. The viral load distribution for 142 MP-NAT yield donations was characterized, relative to the analytical sensitivity of MP-NAT systems.

RESULTS

Analytical sensitivities (50% limits of detection [LoD] based on Poisson model of detection of WNV standards) for screening NAT assays ranged from 3.4 to 29 copies per mL; when diluted consistent with MP pool sizes, the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays was reduced to 43 to 309 copies per mL. Analytical sensitivity of supplemental assays ranged from 1.5 to 7.7 copies per mL (50% LoD). Detection of RNA in donor units varied consistent with analytical LoD of assays. Detection of low-level viremia after MP dilutions was particularly compromised for seropositive units, probably reflecting lower viral loads in the postseroconversion phase. Based on the viral load distribution of MP-NAT yield donations (median, 3519 copies/mL; range, < 50-690,000), 13 to 24 percent of units had viral loads below the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays run in MP-NAT format.

CONCLUSION

WNV screening and supplemental assays had generally excellent analytical sensitivity, comparable to human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus NAT assays. The presence of low-level viremic units during epidemic periods and the impact of MP dilutions on sensitivity, however, suggest the need for further improvements in sensitivity as well as a role for targeted individual-donation NAT in epidemic regions.

A new strategy for estimating risks of transfusion-transmitted viral infections based on rates of detection of recently infected donors

BACKGROUND

Estimates for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transfusion-transmitted risks have relied on incidence derived from repeat donor histories and imprecise estimates for infectious, preseroconversion window periods (WPs).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

By use of novel approaches, WPs were estimated by back-extrapolation of acute viral replication dynamics. Incidence was derived from the yield of viremic, antibody-negative donations detected by routine minipool nucleic acid testing (MP-NAT) of 37 million US donations (1999-2002) or from sensitive/less-sensitive HIV-1 enzyme immunoassay (S/LS-EIA) results for seropositive samples from 6.5 million donations (1999). Incidences and WPs were combined to calculate risks and project yield of individual donation (ID)-NAT.

RESULTS

The HIV-1 WP from presumed infectivity (1 copy/20 mL) to ID-NAT detection was estimated at 5.6 days, and the periods from ID to MP-NAT detection and from MP-NAT to p24 detection at 3.4 and 6.0 days, respectively; corresponding estimates for HCV were 4.9, 2.5, and 50.9 days (the latter represents period from MP-NAT to HCV antibody detection). The HIV-1 incidence projected from MP-NAT yield or from S/LS-EIA data was 1.8 per 100,000 person-years, resulting in a corresponding HIV-1 transfusion-transmitted risk of 1 in 2.3 million. The HCV incidence from MP-NAT yield was 2.70 per 100,000 person-years with a corresponding risk of 1 in 1.8 million donations. Conversion from MP-NAT to ID-NAT was projected to detect two to three additional HIV-1 and HCV infectious units annually.

CONCLUSIONS

MP-NAT yield and S/LS-EIA rates can accurately project transfusion risks. HCV and HIV-1 risks, currently estimated at 1 per 2 million units, could be reduced to 1 in 3 to 4 million units by ID-NAT screening.

Assessment of the target-capture PCR hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitative assay and comparison with commercial HBV DNA quantitative assays

Recent clinical studies suggest that hepatitis B virus (HBV) load and genotype may be independent predictors of responses to antiviral therapies. However, it is difficult for clinicians to accurately determine viral loads in patient samples because results--both the values and the units of measure--can vary greatly among different tests. Accordingly, the World Health Organization (WHO) has produced the first international standard for HBV DNA for nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays. In the present study, we describe the performance of the target-capture PCR HBV DNA quantitative assay for the quantitation of HBV DNA in clinical samples and reference panels. The range of quantitation was between 50 and 10(10) IU/ml. The sensitivity and accuracy of the target-capture PCR assay were demonstrated by using the HBV panel from Quality Control for Medical Diagnostics (QCMD) and the WHO HBV DNA standard. The target-capture PCR assay quantitated the six genotype A members of the QCMD panel and dilutions of the WHO HBV DNA standard within an accuracy of 74 to 142%. Compared to current serological methods, the assay offers window period reductions of 19 days prior to HBV surface antigen and 26 days prior to HBV e antigen detection. The target-capture PCR assay was also compared with four commercially available NAT assays, and the various units of measure were standardized with respect to the international units of the WHO HBV DNA standard. The target-capture PCR assay is a sensitive, accurate, high-throughput, rapid, and reproducible assay for the determination of HBV loads.

Detection of HIV-1 and HCV infections among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic acid-amplification testing

BACKGROUND

Testing of blood donors for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by means of nucleic acid amplification was introduced in the United States as an investigational screening test in mid-1999 to identify donations made during the window period before seroconversion.

METHODS

We analyzed all antibody-nonreactive donations that were confirmed to be positive for HIV-1 and HCV RNA on nucleic acid-amplification testing of "minipools" (pools of 16 to 24 donations) by the main blood-collection programs in the United States during the first three years of nucleic acid screening.

RESULTS

Among 37,164,054 units screened, 12 were confirmed to be positive for HIV-1 RNA--or 1 in 3.1 million donations--only 2 of which were detected by HIV-1 p24 antigen testing. For HCV, of 39,721,404 units screened, 170 were confirmed to be positive for HCV RNA, or 1 in 230,000 donations (or 1 in 270,000 on the basis of 139 donations confirmed to be positive for HCV RNA with the use of a more sensitive HCV-antibody test). The respective rates of positive HCV and HIV-1 nucleic acid-amplification tests were 3.3 and 4.1 times as high among first-time donors as among donors who gave blood repeatedly. Follow-up studies of 67 HCV RNA-positive donors demonstrated that seroconversion occurred a median of 35 days after the index donation, followed by a low rate of resolution of viremia; three cases of long-term immunologically silent HCV infection were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Minipool nucleic acid-amplification testing has helped prevent the transmission of approximately 5 HIV-1 infections and 56 HCV infections annually and has reduced the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HIV-1 and HCV to approximately 1 in 2 million blood units.

Detection of an early HIV-1 infection by HIV RNA testing in an Italian blood donor during the preseroconversion window period

BACKGROUND

The implementation of NAT technologies for HIV screening has further reduced the diagnostic window in recent HIV infection. There is still a debate regarding the cost effectiveness of genomic screening of blood donations for transfusion-transmitted viruses (HBV, HCV, HIV).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Since October 2001, at the Transfusion Service of Verona, single-donation NAT testing for HCV and HIV-1 (Procleix TMA HIV-1/HCV Assay) of all blood donations has been performed.

CASE REPORT

A case of acute HIV-1 infection detected by HIV NAT in a repeat blood donor who donated during the preseroconversion window period is reported. All blood components donated were discarded, and the donor started antiretroviral therapy 2 weeks after blood donation. HIV-1 p24 antigen was still negative 10 days after the HIV-1 RNA-positive blood donation. Seroconversion was documented by Day 41 after donation.

CONCLUSION

This case report testifies that HIV NAT screening of blood donation is effective in preventing the transmission of HIV infection through blood components.

[Application of molecular biology to blood transfusion safety: the nucleic acid testing]

Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) for HIV-1 and HCV has been introduced in France and became mandatory for all homologous blood donations since July 1st 2001 in addition to serology screening. Previously, a feasibility study led to the selection of 2 technologies : a TMA based assay (Chiron) uses the Procleix HIV-/HCV assay on pools of 8 samples and a PCR based assay from BioMérieux-Roche which is a combination of an RNA extraction system (NucliSens, BioMérieux) with a fully automated system for nucleic acid amplification and detection (Cobas Amplicor, Roche). This system uses the Cobas Ampliscreen HCV test v.2.0 and the The Cobas Ampliscreen HIV test v1.5, on 24 sample pools. Pooling was required because single-donation testing is not yet feasible, as a result of the limitations in automation available for all current NAT technologies. The two technologies were easily implemented and showed nearly the same detection limit for HCV RNA and HIV-1 RNA. During a one-year period, from July 1st 2001 to June 30, 2002, out of the 2.5 million donations tested, the NAT yield resulted in one HIV-1 RNA positive-antibody negative donation and one HCV RNA positive-antibody negative donation. Two HIV NAT positive-antibody negative donations were missed by minipool NAT because a very low viral load. Moreover, the NAT implementation did not impact on blood component availability, including platelet concentrates.