Detection of human papillomavirus type 16 in bowenoid papulosis and nonbowenoid tissues

Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among males 11-26 years in United States: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012

Anogenital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the leading sexually transmitted infection in the United States. In October 2011, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV4) was recommended for males in the U.S. We analyzed a subsample of 11–26 year old (N = 1012) males, from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2011–2012 dataset, to examine HPV vaccine uptake. The initiation rates in the 11–17 years and the 18–26 years age-groups were 10.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.09–16.6%) and 5.5% (95%CI: 3.1–9.5%) respectively. The corresponding HPV vaccine completion rates were 39.3% (16.7–67.7%) for the 11–17 year old males and 59.1% (37.2–77.6) for the 18–26-year-old males. Despite a slight increase, HPV vaccine uptake remained low among males. These findings can help in HPV vaccination policy in the United States, with a focus on informational messages directed toward young males and their parents in order to increase uptake of HPV vaccine.

Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases

BACKGROUND

A phase 3 trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a prophylactic quadrivalent vaccine in preventing anogenital diseases associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18.

METHODS

In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial involving 5455 women between the ages of 16 and 24 years, we assigned 2723 women to receive vaccine and 2732 to receive placebo at day 1, month 2, and month 6. The coprimary composite end points were the incidence of genital warts, vulvar or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, or cancer and the incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer associated with HPV type 6, 11, 16, or 18. Data for the primary analysis were collected for a per-protocol susceptible population of women who had no virologic evidence of HPV type 6, 11, 16, or 18 through 1 month after administration of the third dose.

RESULTS

The women were followed for an average of 3 years after administration of the first dose. In the per-protocol population, those followed for vulvar, vaginal, or perianal disease included 2261 women (83%) in the vaccine group and 2279 (83%) in the placebo group. Those followed for cervical disease included 2241 women (82%) in the vaccine group and 2258 (83%) in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was 100% for each of the coprimary end points. In an intention-to-treat analysis, including those with prevalent infection or disease caused by vaccine-type and non-vaccine-type HPV, vaccination reduced the rate of any vulvar or vaginal perianal lesions regardless of the causal HPV type by 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15 to 49), and the rate of cervical lesions regardless of the causal HPV type by 20% (95% CI, 8 to 31).

CONCLUSIONS

The quadrivalent vaccine significantly reduced the incidence of HPV-associated anogenital diseases in young women. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00092521 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Penile cancer

Penile cancer, while relatively rare in the western world, remains a disease with severe morbidity and mortality, not to mention significant psychological ramifications. Furthermore, the disease is observed with dramatically increased incidence in other parts of the world. A review of the literature has shown that the overwhelming majority of penile cancers are in situ or invasive squamous cell carcinomas, including a well-differentiated variant, verrucous carcinoma. Important predisposing factors are lack of circumcision, human papillomavirus infections, and penile lichen sclerosus, although other factors have occasionally been reported as well. Prevention, careful monitoring of patients at risk, and early diagnosis are essential to reduce the incidence of penile carcinoma and to provide a definitive cure. Public health measures, such as prophylactic use of circumcision, have proved successful but are controversial. Also, no standard therapeutic guidelines as to the best treatment strategy according to different stages, including efficacy of conservative nonsurgical modalities and indications for lymph nodal dissection, are available so far. It is common opinion that penile cancer is an emerging problem that deserves further investigations, and physicians, especially dermatologists, should be aware of this issue.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with penile carcinoma, its risk factors, its clinical and histologic presentation, and the treatments currently available for its management.