Monitoring blood transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: an audit methodology

Suction, salvage, sutures, and potions: blood management post-aprotinin

Hemostasis management of the cardiac surgical patient has changed following the withdrawal of aprotinin for use in cardiac surgical patients. The challenge to minimize blood loss and reduce exposure of cardiac surgical patients to blood products continues to grow with patients presenting being older and sicker and more complex procedures being performed. The cardiac surgery team has many options available for it to consider; although current recommendations strongly support the use of cell salvage as one process to assist in this challenge, other options need to be equally critically evaluated.

Aspirin and Tranexamic Acid for Coronary Artery Surgery (ATACAS) Trial: rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Despite some concern that recent aspirin ingestion increases blood loss after coronary artery surgery, there is some evidence that this may reduce thrombotic complications. In contrast, antifibrinolytic drugs can reduce blood loss in this setting, but there is concern that they may increase thrombotic complications. Published guidelines are limited by a lack of large randomized trials addressing the risks and benefits of each of these commonly used therapies in cardiac surgery. The ATACAS Trial is a study comparing aspirin, tranexamic acid, or both, with placebo in patients undergoing on-pump or off-pump coronary artery surgery.

METHODS

We discuss the rationale for conducting ATACAS, a 4600-patient, multicenter randomized trial in at-risk coronary artery surgery, and the features of the ATACAS study design (objectives, end points, target population, allocation, treatments, patient follow-up, and analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

The ATACAS Trial will be the largest study yet conducted to ascertain the benefits and risks of aspirin and antifibrinolytic therapy in coronary artery surgery. Results of the trial will guide the routine clinical care of patients in this setting.

Strengthening the service continuum between transfusion providers and suppliers: enhancing the blood services network

As the cost of health care increases, the focus on cost containment grows. The pressure to reduce costs comes at the same time the public focus is on ensuring a zero-risk blood supply. The blood supply has never been safer or more expensive. With the relative vanquishing of transfusion-transmitted diseases, noninfectious risks now exceed infectious risks. This has resulted in a call to refocus blood safety efforts on interconnected processes that link a unit of blood from its volunteer blood donor to the patient. Additional costs in the blood supply chain will create new pressures on an already taxed system that gets little additional reimbursement with each new safety initiative. Opposing interests have created a tenuous relationship between the blood supplier and the transfusion provider. This adversarial relationship does not benefit the ultimate stakeholder, the patient. It is time to create a service partnership that is built on access, cost, and quality. Initiatives must be undertaken at a local, regional, and national level. Locally, blood suppliers and transfusion providers must reevaluate policies that are focused on individual gain and reinvent policies that will reward improvements in the overall system and expand cooperative services. Regionally, both blood suppliers and transfusion providers need to consolidate services to gain cost and quality benefits without compromising the competitive nature of the industry. Nationally, the creation of a strategic plan will help ensure that a mutually beneficial relationship focused on the patient is created between the blood supplier and transfusion provider at all levels. Development of such a plan would benefit the transfusing and supplying parties by identifying areas of common interest and how each may facilitate the achievement of shared benefits.