Late esophageal toxicity using a combination of external beam radiation, intraluminal brachytherapy and 5-fluorouracil infusion in carcinoma of the esophagus

A prospective study of radical external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy combined with intraluminal brachytherapy for primary esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

This study compared the efficacy and side effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) with EBRT alone in patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2013 and 2020, 64 patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer without surgery received radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received EBRT + IBT. EBRT dose was 50 Gy, 2 Gy/f, 5 times a week, and IBT dose was 10 Gy, 5 Gy/f, once a week. Thirty-two patients received EBRT alone, and the total dose was 60 Gy. The median followup was 19 months.

RESULTS

The local control rates (LCR) of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment were 88% and 72%, 53% and 22%, 25%, and 9%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of the EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 3 years after treatment were 38% and 9%. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group were 25% and 9%. Univariate analysis showed that EBRT + IBT could be the prognostic factor improving OS (p = 0.04), and tumor located in the mid-thoracic region exhibited a poorer prognosis on LRFS (p = 0.03). Grade 3 or higher acute side effects included two cases of dysphagia and three cases of bone marrow suppression. Severe late side effects included three cases of fistula, three cases of radiation pneumonia, and five cases of stenosis requiring treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with EBRT alone, EBRT + IBT is an effective treatment modality for T1∼3NanyM0 primary thoracic esophageal cancer with good local control. It can prolong the survival time of patients and has acceptable toxicity.

Comparative study of concomitant chemoradiation versus concomitant chemoradiation followed by high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a single institutional study

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare efficacy and toxicity between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) and CCRT in inoperable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

Material and methods

Thirty-four patients with inoperable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were randomized into two arms. In the CCRT + ILBT arm (arm A), eighteen patients received 50.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction over 5.6 weeks, along with concurrent cisplatin (75 mg/m²) intravenously on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m²) continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-5, starting on the first day of irradiation and repeated after 28 days. This was followed by ILBT boost with a dose of 10 Gy in 2 fractions, one week apart. In the CCRT arm (arm B), sixteen patients received two cycles of chemotherapy, using the same schedule, along with external beam radiotherapy fractionated in a similar manner without brachytherapy boost. The endpoints were tumor response, acute and late toxicities, disease and progression-free survival.

Results

With a median follow-up of 13 months, the complete response rate was 88.89% in arm A and 87.50% in arm B (p = 0.71). Acute esophageal toxicity was higher in CCRT followed by ILBT arm (p = 0.60). There was no significant difference between the Kaplan Meier survival plots of disease-free survival (p = 0.68) and progression-free survival (p = 0.55).

Conclusions

In our study, addition of brachytherapy as a boost following concurrent chemoradiation failed to improve treatment outcomes without additional toxicity in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Safety and outcome of external beam radiation and neutron brachytherapy in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes of 191 elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) who were treated with californium-252 (²⁵²Cf) neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

Material and methods

From January 2002 to November 2012, 191 patients with ESCC underwent NBT in combination with EBRT. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8-25 Gy-eq in two to five fractions with one fraction per week. The total dose via EBRT was 50-60 Gy, which was delivered over a period of 5 to 6 weeks with normal fractionation.

Results

The median survival time for the 191 patients was 23.6 months, and the 5-year rates for overall survival (OS) and local-regional control (LRC) were 28.7% and 54.2%, respectively. The patients’ age was a factor that was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.010), according to univariate analysis. The 5-year OS (LRC) was 37.3% (58.6%) for patients aged 70-74 years and 14.5% (47.9%) for patients aged > 74 years (p = 0.010 and p = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, age and clinical N stage were associated with OS and LRC (p = 0.011 [0.041] and p = 0.005 [0.005]). From the time of treatment completion to the development of local-regional recurrence or death, 5 (2.6%) patients experienced fistula and 15 (7.9%) experienced massive bleeding. The incidence of severe late complications was related to older age (p = 0.027), higher NBT dose/fraction (20-25 Gy/5 fractions), and higher total dose (> 66 Gy).

Conclusions

The clinical data indicated that NBT in combination with EBRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for elderly patients with ESCC, and that the side effects were tolerable. Patient’s age, clinical stage N status, and radiation dose could be used to select the appropriate treatment for elderly patients.

A retrospective study of external beam radiation, neutron brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with localized advanced carcinoma of the esophagus

Purpose

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes of a total of 140 esophageal cancer patients who were treated with californium-252 (²⁵²Cf) neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CCT).

Methods and materials

From January 2002 to November 2012, 140 patients with esophageal cancer underwent NBT in combination with EBRT and CCT. The distribution of the patient numbers over the various cancer stages of IIA, IIB, and III were 43, 7, and 90, respectively. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8–25 Gy-eq in two to five fractions with one fraction per week. The total dose via EBRT was 50–60 Gy, which was delivered over a period of five to six weeks with normal fractionation. Fifty-four and 86 patients received tegafur suppositories (TS) and continuous infusion of fluorouracil (5-Fu) with cisplatin (CDDP), respectively.

Results

The median follow-up time was 42 months. The minimum follow-up was three months, and the maximum was 106 months. The overall median survival including death from all causes was 29.5 months. The five-year overall survival rate (OS) and local control (LC) were 33.4% and 55.9%, respectively. The chemotherapy regimen was a factor that was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.025) according to univariate analysis. The five-year OSs were 27.4% and 44.3% for the PF and TS chemotherapy regimens, respectively. Regarding acute toxicity, no incidences of fistula or massive bleeding were observed during this treatment period. The incidence of severe, late complications was related to the PF chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.080).

Conclusions

The clinical data indicated that NBT in combination with EBRT and CRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for patients with esophageal cancer and that the side effects were tolerable. A reasonable CRT regimen can decrease the rate of severe, late complications.

The safety and usefulness of neutron brachytherapy and external beam radiation in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with or without chemotherapy

Purpose

To assess the safety and usefulness of neutron brachytherapy (NBT) as an adjuvant in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) with external beam radiation (EBRT), with or without chemotherapy.

Methods and Materials

In total, 197 patients with localized, advanced GEJAC received EBRT and NBT with or without chemotherapy. Radiotherapy consisted of external irradiation to a total dose of 40–54 Gy (median 50 Gy) and brachytherapy to 8–25 Gy (median 20 Gy) in two to five fractions. In total, 88 patients received chemotherapy that consisted of two cycles of a regimen with CDDP and 5FU from days l-4. The cycles were administered on days 1 and 29. MMC was given alone in bolus injection on day 1 each week. The cycles were administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22.

Results

The duration of follow-up ranged from six to 106 months (median 30.4 months). The median survival time for the 197 patients was 13.3 months, and the one, two, three- and five-year rates for overall survival were 57.1%, 35.1%, 23.0% and 9.2%, respectively. For acute toxicity, no incidences of fistula and massive bleeding were observed during this treatment period. In total, 159 (80.7%) patients developed Grade 2 hematologic toxicity and 146 (74.1%) patients developed Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis. The median times of incidence of fistula and bleeding were 9.5 (3–27.3) months and 12.7 (5–43.4) months, respectively. The incidence of severe, late complications was related to higher NBT dose/f (20–25 Gy/5 F) and higher total dose(≥70 Gy). In total, 75.2% of the patients resumed normal swallowing and 2.0% had some residual dysphagia (non-malignant) requiring intermittent dilatation.

Conclusion

A combination of EBRT and NBT with the balloon type applicator was feasible and well tolerated. Better local-regional control and overall survival cannot achieved by a higher dose, and in contrast, a higher dose caused more severe esophageal injury.

Intraluminal brachytherapy in the management of squamous carcinoma of the esophagus

Intraluminal high dose rate brachytherapy (ILHDR BT) is one of several effective modalities for palliation of advanced esophageal cancer. Thirty patients with endoscopic-proven, mostly locally advanced, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, not involving the gastroesophageal junction and without distant metastases, were included in this analysis. Twenty-nine patients received two ILHDR BT sessions of 8 Gy within a week and one patient received only one session. All patients were followed monthly. Outcomes included quality of life (QOL), symptoms control: dysphagia, regurgitation, odynophagia, and chest or back pain, as well as, overall survival. Through 4 months of follow-up, QOL was statistically improved (having lowered scores) in regards to feelings (P= 0.013), sleeping (P= 0.032), eating (P= 0.020), and social life (P= 0.002). The most significantly improved symptom was dysphagia (P < 0.006), with a reduction of 0.52 units or one-half grade. Regurgitation, odynophagia, and pain were lower during follow-up but were not statistically significant. The median overall survival from death of any cause was 165 days (with a 95% confidence interval of 128-195 days). In conclusion, ILHDR BT of advanced squamous esophageal cancer consisting of two out-patient procedures is very successful in achieving the primary objectives of the patients to reduce dysphagia and improve QOL.

A randomised trial of radiotherapy compared with cisplatin chemo-radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell cancer of the esophagus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Following our phase II experience, a randomised trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell cancer of the esophagus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients randomised to the RT group received 50 Gy/25 fx/5 weeks of teletherapy followed 1-2 weeks later with 12 Gy/2 fx of high-dose-rate intra-lumenal brachytherapy spaced a week apart. Following the first 3 years of recruitment, due to unexpected late morbidity, brachytherapy was excluded and the protocol modified to 66 Gy/33 fx/6.5 weeks. The CRT group received identical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin at 35 mg/m(2) for 6-7 cycles.

RESULTS

Between April 1999 and December 2005, 125 patients were randomised to a RT (n=60) or CRT group (n=65). Radiotherapy treatment was completed in 78% (47/60) of the RT group and 89% (58/65) of the CRT group (P=0.10). Six or more cycles of cisplatin could be delivered in 63% (41/65), which resulted in RTOG grade 3 neutropenia of 3%. Late morbidity in the form of ulcers (5% vs. 15% odds ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-1.11, P=0.08) and strictures (13% vs. 28%, odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.16-1.01, P=0.05) was observed in the RT and CRT groups, respectively. At a median follow up of 23 months of all patients alive (range 6-82 months) and with 95/125 events, the median, 1, 2 and 5 year projected survival was 7.1 months, 32.3%, 22.8% and 13.7% vs. 13.4 months, 57.6%, 38.9% and 24.8% for the RT and CRT groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.98, P=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of concurrent cisplatin to radiotherapy resulted in a modest improvement in survival and was associated with manageable additional acute and late morbidity.

The safety and usefulness of high-dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy as a boost in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer with external beam radiation with or without chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This study reports the results of a single-institution experience with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) used as a boost in the treatment of esophageal cancer with external beam radiation therapy (ERT) with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients without evidence of metastatic disease were identified. HDRBT was given before ERT with a dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients with a Karnofsky performance of more than 70 received treatment with 50 Gy in 25 fractions and concurrent 5-fluorouracil and cis-platinum during Weeks 1 and 5, whereas patients with a Karnofsky performance of less than 70 were treated with radiation therapy alone with 35 Gy in 14 fractions.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received HDRBT treatment with combined ERT and chemotherapy and 17 patients with ERT alone. The incidence of acute bone marrow toxicity was 55% Grade 2 and 15% Grade 3, and 85% of patients had Grade 2 esophagitis. With a median follow-up time of 26 months, the median survival was 21 months; the 2-year local recurrence was 25%, and the 5-year survival rate was 28%.

CONCLUSION

HDRBT is safe and beneficial for local control in the radical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

Palliation of advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma with high-dose-rate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The aim was to assess the improvement in swallowing status, complication rate, and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma were treated for palliation with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (HDR-ILRT) with a remote afterloading microSelectron unit (192Ir source) with or without external radiation from November 1994 to May 2000 at the Tata Memorial Hospital. The mean age was 64 years. The mid-third of the esophagus was involved in 38 patients (66%). The group was comprised of 37 previously untreated patients (29 with < or = 50% Karnofsky performance status and old age, 4 with metastatic disease, and 4 with second primary esophageal lesions) and 21 patients with post-treatment recurrent tumors. Thirty-eight patients (65%) received intraluminal brachytherapy alone, whereas the remaining 20 patients (35%) received a combination of external and intraluminal radiation therapy. All patients received 2 fractions of HDR-ILRT 1 week apart with 600 cGy per fraction at 1 cm off axis.

RESULTS

Overall improvement in swallowing status was seen in 22 patients (48%), and 24 (41%) maintained pretreatment swallowing status. Median dysphagia-free survival was 10 months. Overall complication rates were 30%, with stricture seen in 9 patients (15%), ulceration in 6 (10%), and tracheo-esophageal fistula in 3 patients (5%). Complication rates were higher in the post-treatment group (38%) than in the previously untreated group (27%) (p = 0.29). The median overall survival for the entire group was 7 months. Median survival was better, although not significantly, for the previously untreated cohort: 7.8 months vs. 6 months for the post-treatment group (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

HDR-ILRT brachytherapy achieves good palliation with acceptable complications in advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma.

Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Some patients and oncologists choose to treat localized esophageal cancer with definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy rather than surgery. A subset of these patients have local relapse without distant metastases and therefore have no other curative intent treatment option but salvage esophagectomy.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with salvage esophagectomy from 1987 to 2000 at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 13, salvage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy group) and compared the data with those of patients receiving esophagectomy in a planned fashion 4 to 6 weeks after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (n = 99, preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy group).

RESULTS

Increases in morbidity were seen after resection in the salvage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy group relative to the preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy group: mechanical ventilation (9.0 days vs 3.3 days, P =.08), intensive care unit stay (11.2 days vs 5.1 days, P =.07), hospital stay (29.4 days vs 18.4 days, P =.03), and anastomotic leak rates (5/13 [39%] vs 7/99 [7%], P =.005). Operative mortality (within 30 days) also tended to be increased statistically nonsignificantly (2/13 [15%] vs 6/99 [6%], P =.2). Salvage esophagectomy resulted in long-term survival (25% 5-year survival) in a subset of patients. Improved survival after salvage esophagectomy was associated with early pathologic stage (T1 N0, T2 N0), prolonged time to relapse, and R0 surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy for relapse of tumor after definitive chemoradiation therapy have increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital use relative to patients undergoing planned esophagectomy after preoperative chemoradiation. Nevertheless, long-term survival can be achieved in this group, and such treatment should be considered for carefully selected patients at an experienced center.