Metformin and lactic acidosis in diabetic humans

Methylene Blue in Metformin Intoxication: Not Just Rescue But Also Initial Treatment

ABSTRACT

Metformin (MTF) is a widely used oral antidiabetic medication. Regardless the reason, high doses of MTF cause lactic acidosis as a result of its effects on mitochondrial ATP production and no-mediated vascular smooth muscle relaxation. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis can be life-threatening despite all treatments. Methylene blue (MB) has the potential to reverse the toxic effects of MTF through its effects on both the mitochondrial respiratory chain and nitric oxide production. The use of MB in MTF intoxication has only been reported in a limited number of cases. Herein, we present a 16-year-old female patient who attempted suicide by ingesting high doses of MTF. Supportive treatments, such as vasopressor, inotropic treatments, and sodium bicarbonate, were started in the patient who developed fluid-resistant hypotension after pediatric intensive care unit admission. Because of rising lactate levels, Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was started immediately. Despite all treatments, hypotension and hyperlactatemia persisted; MB was given as a rescue therapy. Noticeable hemodynamic improvement was observed within 30 minutes of initiating MB infusion, allowing a gradual decrease in the doses of inotropic infusions within the first hour of therapy. Patient's cardiovascular support was discontinued on the second day, and she was discharged on the fifth day. We speculate that, considering the mechanisms of MTF toxicity and the mechanisms of action of MB, it is suggested that early administration of MB, not only as a rescue treatment but as the initial approach to MTF poisoning in combination with other treatments, may result in improved outcomes.

Shouldn't Stage 4 And 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Use Metformin?

Metformin is the first place anti-diabetic agent recommended with life style changes in many guidelines for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The mechanism of effect of the drug is to increase insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissue and reduce glucose secretion from the liver. Metformin is a low cost, effective and safe drug. Although its frequent side effects are gastrointestinal side effects and the most feared side effect is lactic acidosis. Due to this side effect, its use is limited in many guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this article, we examined the use of metformin in all stages of CKD. We investigated the incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA). Shouldn't stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease patients use metformin? We sought an answer to question. As a result, we decided that side effects like MALA are extremely rare. We observed that these side effects occur mostly in the presence of diseases in which tissue perfusion is impaired such as infections, serious cardiovascular events, and hypotension. We came to the conclusion that metformin should be used in patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD patients, without much fear, considering the profit and loss relationship.

Metformin turns 62 in pharmacotherapy: Emergence of non-glycaemic effects and potential novel therapeutic applications

Metformin is the most commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic medication. Direct/indirect activation of Adenosine Monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and non-AMPK pathways, amongst others, are deemed to explain the molecular mechanisms of action of metformin. Metformin is an established insulin receptor sensitising antihyperglycemic agent, is highly affordable, and has superior safety and efficacy profiles. Emerging experimental and clinical evidence suggests that metformin has pleiotropic non-glycemic effects. Metformin appears to have weight stabilising, renoprotective, neuroprotective, cardio-vascular protective, and antineoplastic effects and mitigates polycystic ovarian syndrome. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of metformin seem to qualify it as an adjunct therapy in treating infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, viral hepatitis, and the current novel Covid-19 infections. So far, metformin is the only prescription medicine relevant to the emerging field of senotherapeutics. Non-glycemic effects of metformin favourable to its repurposing in therapeutic use are hereby discussed.

Genetic polymorphisms of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) and responses to metformin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Metformin is one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite its widespread use, there are considerable interindividual variations in metformin response, with about 35% of patients failing to achieve initial glycemic control. These variabilities that reflect phenotypic differences in drug disposition and action may indeed be due to polymorphisms in genes that regulate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin. Moreover, interethnic differences in drug responses in some cases correspond to substantial differences in the frequencies of the associated pharmacogenomics risk allele.

AIM

This study aims to highlight and summarize the overall effects of organic cation transporter 1(OCT1) polymorphisms on therapeutic responses to metformin and to evaluate the potential role of such polymorphisms in interethnic differences in metformin therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, relevant studies reporting the effects of OCT1 polymorphisms on metformin therapy in T2DM individuals. Data were extracted on study design, population characteristics, relevant polymorphisms, measure of genetic association, and outcomes. The presence of gastrointestinal side effects, glycated hemoglobin A1 (HbA1c) levels, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) concentrations after treatment with metformin were chosen as measures of the metformin responses. This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

RESULTS

According to the data extracted, a total of 34 OCT1 polymorphisms were identified in 10 ethnic groups. Significant differences in the frequencies of common alleles were observed among these groups. Met408Val (rs628031) variant was the most extensively explored with metformin responses. Although some genotypes and alleles have been associated with deleterious effects on metformin response, others indeed, exhibited positive effects.

CONCLUSION

Genetic effects of OCT1 polymorphisms on metformin responses were population specific. Further investigations in other populations are required to set ethnicity-specific reference for metformin responses and to obtain a solid basis to design personalized therapeutic approaches for T2DM treatment.

Cardioprotection by Metformin: Beneficial Effects Beyond Glucose Reduction

Metformin is a biguanide that is widely used as an insulin-sparing agent to treat diabetes. When compared with the general population, diabetics are twice as likely to die from fatal myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure (CHF). There has been a significant concern regarding the use of metformin in patients with CHF because of their higher tendency to develop lactic acidosis. However, large epidemiological trials have reported better cardiovascular prognosis with metformin compared to other glucose-lowering agents among diabetics. Additionally, metformin has reduced the risk of reinfarction and all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease and CHF, respectively. The protection against cardiovascular diseases appears to be independent of the anti-hyperglycemic effects of metformin. These effects are mediated through an increase in 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation and by increased phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in cardiomyocytes with an increased production of nitric oxide (NO). Metformin preconditions the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury and may improve myocardial remodeling after an ischemic insult. The preponderance of evidence currently suggests that metformin is safe in patients with CHF, prompting the Food and Drug Administration to remove CHF as a contraindication from the package insert of all generic metformin preparations. In this narrative, along with a limited meta-analysis of available studies, we have reviewed the pleiotropic (non-glucose-lowering) effects of metformin that potentially contribute to its cardioprotective properties. Additionally, we have reviewed issues surrounding the safety of metformin in patients with cardiac diseases.

Metformin Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3A, 3B, or 4

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to define a safe, effective dose regimen for metformin in moderate and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD; stages 3A/3B and 4, respectively), after the lifting of restrictions on metformin use in patients with diabetes with moderate-to-severe CKD in the absence of prospective safety and efficacy studies.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Three complementary studies were performed: 1) a dose-finding study in CKD stages 1-5, in which blood metformin concentrations were evaluated during a 1-week period after each dose increase; 2) a 4-month metformin treatment study for validating the optimal metformin dose as a function of the CKD stage (3A, 3B, and 4), with blood metformin, lactate, and HbA_1c concentrations monitored monthly; and 3) an assessment of pharmacokinetic parameters after the administration of a single dose of metformin in steady-state CKD stages 3A, 3B, and 4.

RESULTS

First, in the dose-finding study, the appropriate daily dosing schedules were 1,500 mg (0.5 g in the morning [qam] +1 g in the evening [qpm]) in CKD stage 3A, 1,000 mg (0.5 g qam + 0.5 g qpm) in CKD stage 3B, and 500 mg (qam) in CKD stage 4. Second, after 4 months on these regimens, patients displayed stable metformin concentrations that never exceeded the generally accepted safe upper limit of 5.0 mg/L. Hyperlactatemia (>5 mmol/L) was absent (except in a patient with myocardial infarction), and HbA_1c levels did not change. Third, there were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters among the CKD stage groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Provided that the dose is adjusted for renal function, metformin treatment appears to be safe and still pharmacologically efficacious in moderate-to-severe CKD.

Recurrent lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia with inadvertent metformin use: a case of look-alike pills

Metformin is recommended as the first-line agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although this drug has a generally good safety profile, rare but potentially serious adverse effects may occur. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis, although very uncommon, carries a significant risk of mortality. The relationship between metformin accumulation and lactic acidosis is complex and is affected by the presence of comorbid conditions such as renal and hepatic disease. Plasma metformin levels do not reliably correlate with the severity of lactic acidosis. We present a case of inadvertent metformin overdose in a patient with both renal failure and hepatic cirrhosis, leading to two episodes of lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia. The patient was successfully treated with hemodialysis both times and did not develop any further lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia, after the identification of metformin tablets accidentally mixed in with his supply of sevelamer tablets. Early initiation of renal replacement therapy is key in decreasing lactic acidosis-associated mortality.

LEARNING POINTS

When a toxic ingestion is suspected, direct visualization of the patient's pills is advised in order to rule out the possibility of patient- or pharmacist-related medication errors.Though sending a specimen for determination of the plasma metformin concentration is important when a metformin-treated patient with diabetes presents with lactic acidosis, complex relationships exist between metformin accumulation, hyperlactatemia and acidosis, and the drug may not always be the precipitating factor.Intermittent hemodialysis is recommended as the first-line treatment for metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA).An investigational delayed-release form of metformin with reduced systemic absorption may carry a lower risk for MALA in patients with renal insufficiency, in whom metformin therapy may presently be contraindicated.

Acute kidney injury, plasma lactate concentrations and lactic acidosis in metformin users: A GoDarts study

AIMS

Metformin is renally excreted and has been associated with the development of lactic acidosis. Although current advice is to omit metformin during illnesses that may increase the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), the evidence supporting this is lacking. We investigated the relationship between AKI, lactate concentrations and the risk of lactic acidosis in those exposed to metformin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We undertook a population-based case-control study of lactic acidosis in 1746 participants with Type 2 diabetes and 846 individuals without diabetes with clinically measured lactates with and without AKI between 1994 and 2014. AKI was stratified by severity according to "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" guidelines. Mixed-effects logistic and linear regression were used to analyse lactic acidosis risk and lactate concentrations, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-two cases of lactic acidosis were identified. In Type 2 diabetes, those treated with metformin had a greater incidence of lactic acidosis [45.7 per 100 000 patient years; 95% confidence interval (CI) 35.9-58.3] compared to those not exposed to this drug (11.8 per 100 000 patient years; 95% CI 4.9-28.5). Lactate concentrations were 0.34 mmol/L higher in the metformin-exposed cohort (P < .001). The risk of lactic acidosis was higher in metformin users [odds ratio (OR) 2.3; P = .002] and increased with AKI severity (stage 1: OR 3.0, P = .002; stage 2: OR 9.4, P < .001; stage 3: OR 16.1, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A clear association was found between metformin, lactate accumulation and the development of lactic acidosis. This relationship is strongest in those with AKI. These results provide robust evidence to support current recommendations to omit metformin in any illness that may precipitate AKI.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA): Moving towards a new paradigm

Although metformin has been used for over 60 years, the balance between the drug's beneficial and adverse effects is still subject to debate. Following an analysis of how cases of so-called "metformin-associated lactic acidosis" (MALA) are reported in the literature, the present article reviews the pitfalls to be avoided when assessing the purported association between metformin and lactic acidosis. By starting from pathophysiological considerations, we propose a new paradigm for lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Metformin therapy does not necessarily induce metformin accumulation, just as metformin accumulation does not necessarily induce hyperlactatemia, and hyperlactatemia does not necessarily induce lactic acidosis. In contrast to the conventional view, MALA probably accounts for a smaller proportion of cases than either metformin-unrelated lactic acidosis or metformin-induced lactic acidosis. Lastly, this review highlights the need for substantial improvements in the reporting of cases of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Accordingly, we propose a check-list as a guide to clinical practice.

Treatment of Metformin Intoxication Complicated by Lactic Acidosis and Acute Kidney Injury: The Role of Prolonged Intermittent Hemodialysis

Metformin intoxication with lactic acidosis, a potentially lethal condition, may develop in diabetic patients when the drug dose is inappropriate and/or its clearance is reduced. Diagnosis and therapy may be delayed due to nonspecific symptoms at presentation, with severe anion gap metabolic acidosis and elevated serum creatinine values being the most prominent laboratory findings. Confirmation requires measurement of serum metformin by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, but this technique is available only at specialized institutions and cannot be relied on as a guide to immediate treatment. Thus, based on strong clinical suspicion, renal replacement therapy must be started promptly to achieve efficient drug clearance and correct the metabolic acidosis. However, because metformin accumulates in the intracellular compartment with prolonged treatment, a rebound in serum concentrations due to redistribution is expected at the end of dialysis. We report a case of metformin intoxication, severe lactic acidosis, and acute kidney injury in a diabetic patient with pre-existing chronic kidney disease stage 3, treated effectively with sustained low-efficiency dialysis. We discuss the pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment options and highlight specific pharmacokinetic issues that should be considered in selecting the appropriate modality of renal replacement therapy.

Investigation of Risk Factors Affecting Lactate Levels in Japanese Patients Treated with Metformin

Metformin is a biguanaide antidiabetic drug used worldwide, and its effectiveness and benefits have already been established. However, the safety of high doses of metformin in Japanese patients, especially in elderly patients with a decreased renal function, remains unclear. Among the side effects of metformin, lactate acidosis is the most problematic due to a high mortality rate. Therefore, we assessed plasma lactate levels in metformin-treated patients to identify independent risk factors for hyperlactemia. 290 outpatients receiving various doses of metformin at our hospital were enrolled between March and July 2014. Serum electrolytes, Cre (creatinine), BUN (blood urea nitrogen), UA (uric acid), HbA1c (hemoglobin A1c), and lactate levels were investigated. Lactate levels did not significantly differ between the elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (<75 years) groups. Patients in the elderly group had a significantly lower daily metformin dose and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), compared with the non-elderly group (both p<0.005). Between with and without hyperlactemia groups, no significant differences were observed in either Cre or age. On the other hand, patients with hyperlactemia had a significantly higher dose of metformin than those without hyperlactemia (p<0.05). In this study, we found that old age and mildly impaired kidney function were not associated with increased lactate levels, and that a higher dose of metformin may be an independent risk factor for elevated lactate levels in Japanese patients.

The Safety of Metformin in Heart Failure

Objective:

To examine the evidence regarding the safety of metformin in heart failure.

Data Sources:

Searches in MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were performed (1966–February 2007). Search terms included metformin, heart failure, lactic acidosis, clinical trials, and insulin resistance.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Published studies and case reports that evaluated the causal link between metformin and lactic acidosis in patients with heart failure were selected for review.

Data Synthesis:

There were no case reports of patients who had metformin-associated lactic acidosis when heart failure was the only contraindication, Two large retrospective studies showed that metformin does not increase the risk of lactic acidosis in patients with heart failure. However, these retrospective analyses did not account for many important confounding variables. A reduction in mortality rates in metformin users with New York Heart Association Class III and IV heart failure was observed in one small (N = 94) prospective trial.

Conclusions:

Results from 3 trials suggest that metformin may be safe to use in heart failure. Large prospective trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence regarding metformin's safety. Until then, use of metformin in heart failure patients should not be recommended routinely. If it is used in patients with heart failure, they should be monitored closely for signs of lactic acidosis.

Review: Optimal dosing strategies for maximising the clinical response to metformin in type 2 diabetes

Recently revised consensus targets for glycaemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes are challenging and require optimisation of dosing strategies for oral antidiabetic therapies. The demonstration of significant cardiovascular outcome benefits in metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients enrolled in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study has established this agent as the first line oral therapy after diet failure in newly presenting overweight people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The antihyperglycaemic efficacy of metformin increases with increasing daily doses between 500 mg and the upper limits of the recommended daily dosage ( ≥ 2000 mg/day). Although metformin is associated with gastrointestinal side-effects in up to 20% of patients, this is not generally dose related. Transient dose reduction, slower titration and taking the dose with meals may ameliorate the problem. Risk of lactic acidosis due to metformin is negligible when this agent is prescribed correctly, and is unrelated to the plasma metformin concentration. Intensification of metformin therapy within the dose range represents a rational and practical therapeutic strategy for optimising glycaemic control in patients who are suitable for, and tolerant of, metformin treatment. The recently introduced 1000 mg metformin tablet should facilitate the use of higher doses and may help treatment compliance.

Risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in metformin users with renal impairment: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment with metformin in patients with renal impairment is associated with a higher risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations compared with users of a noninsulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) who had never used metformin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A cohort of 223,968 metformin users and 34,571 diabetic patients who had never used metformin were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).The primary outcome was defined as either a CPRD READ code lactic acidosis or a record of a plasma lactate concentration >5 mmol/L. The associations between renal impairment, dose of metformin, and the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations were determined with time-dependent Cox models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

The crude incidence of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users was 7.4 per 100,000 person-years (vs. 2.2 per 100,000 person-years in nonusers). Compared with nonusers, risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users was significantly associated with a renal function <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (adjusted HR 6.37 [95% CI 1.48-27.5]). The increased risk among patients with impaired renal function was further increased in users of ≥730 g of metformin in the preceding year (adjusted HR 11.8 [95% CI 2.27-61.5]) and in users of a recent high daily dose (>2 g) of metformin (adjusted HR 13.0 [95% CI 2.36-72.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is consistent with current recommendations that the renal function of metformin users should be adequately monitored and that the dose of metformin should be adjusted, if necessary, if renal function falls below 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

Metformin and other antidiabetic agents in renal failure patients

This review mainly focuses on metformin, and considers oral antidiabetic therapy in kidney transplant patients and the potential benefits and risks of antidiabetic agents other than metformin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In view of the debate concerning lactic acidosis associated with metformin, this review tries to solve a paradox: metformin should be prescribed more widely because of its beneficial effects, but also less widely because of the increasing prevalence of contraindications to metformin, such as reduced renal function. Lactic acidosis appears either as part of a number of clinical syndromes (i.e., unrelated to metformin), induced by metformin (involving an analysis of the drug's pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of action), or associated with metformin (a more complex situation, as lactic acidosis in a metformin-treated patient is not necessarily accompanied by metformin accumulation, nor does metformin accumulation necessarily lead to lactic acidosis). A critical analysis of guidelines and literature data on metformin therapy in patients with CKD is presented. Following the present focus on metformin, new paradoxical issues can be drawn up, in particular: (i) metformin is rarely the sole cause of lactic acidosis; (ii) lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin therapy is erroneously still considered a single medical entity, as several different scenarios can be defined, with contrasting prognoses. The prognosis for severe lactic acidosis seems even better in metformin-treated patients than in non-metformin users.

The prognostic value of blood pH and lactate and metformin concentrations in severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis

Aims

Analysis of the prognostic values of blood pH and lactate and plasma metformin concentrations in severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis may help to resolve the following paradox: metformin provides impressive, beneficial effects but is also associated with life-threatening adverse effects.

Research design and methods

On the basis of 869 pharmacovigilance reports on MALA with available data on arterial pH and lactate concentration, plasma metformin concentration and outcome, we selected cases with a pH < 7.0 and a lactate concentration >10 mmol/L. Outcomes were compared with those described for severe metformin-independent lactic acidosis.

Results

Fifty-six patients met the above-mentioned criteria. The mean arterial pH and lactate values were 6.75 ± 0.17 and 23.07 ± 6.94 mmol/L, respectively. The survival rate was 53%, even with pH values as low as 6.5 and lactate and metformin concentrations as high as 35.3 mmol/L and 160 mg/L (normal < 1 mg/L), respectively. Survivors and non-survivors did not differ significantly in terms of the mean arterial pH and lactate concentration. The mean metformin concentration was higher in patients who subsequently died but this difference was due to a very high value (188 mg/L) in one patient in this group, in whom several triggering factors were combined. Sepsis, multidrug overdoses and the presence of at least two triggering factors for lactic acidosis were observed significantly more frequently in non-survivors (p = 0.007, 0.04, and 0.005, respectively). This contrasts with a study of metformin-independent lactic acidosis in which there were no survivors, despite less severe acidosis on average (mean pH: 6.86).

Conclusions

In 56 cases of severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis, blood pH and lactate did not have prognostic value. One can reasonably rule out the extent of metformin accumulation as a prognostic factor. Ultimately, the determinants of metformin-associated lactic acidosis appear to be the nature and number of triggering factors. Strikingly, most patients survived - despite a mean pH that is incompatible with a favorable outcome under other circumstances.

The criteria for metformin-associated lactic acidosis: the quality of reporting in a large pharmacovigilance database

AIMS

To study the quality of pharmacovigilance reporting in cases of so-called 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis' and, ultimately, whether or not the criteria for this condition are indeed met.

METHODS

We searched for cases meeting the criteria for metformin-associated lactic acidosis [arterial pH < 7.35, blood lactate > 5 mmol/l (45 mg/dl) and detectable plasma metformin concentration] in a 15-year period (1995-2010) in a pharmacovigilance database of the license holder for metformin (Merck Serono, Lyon, France).

RESULTS

We found 869 reports stated as 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis' from 32 countries. The respective criteria for pH, lactate concentration and metformin concentration were met in 51.2, 53.3 and 13.9% of cases. All three criteria were met in just 10.4% of cases. By year, each of the percentages remained roughly stable throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of metformin in triggering metformin-associated lactic acidosis was assessed incorrectly in most patients and the quality of reporting did not improve over time.

Monitoring metformin in cardiac patients exposed to contrast media using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry

BACKGROUND

There is no evidence that the use of contrast media (CM) in diabetic patients with serum creatinine <130 μmole/L leads to metformin accumulation and subsequent lactic acidosis. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to monitor cardiac patients for the effects of CM on their metformin plasma concentration and serum creatinine clearance (ClCr).

METHODS

Metformin plasma concentrations were measured by a new, fully validated specific, precise, and accurate ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometric assay. The detection was performed using positive electrospray ionization in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. Fifty patients with serum creatinine levels <130 μmole/L were monitored for the effect of CM exposure on metformin concentration and ClCr. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in 8 of these patients, and metformin accumulation was monitored in 10 patients before and after their exposure to CM.

RESULTS

Linear response (r ≥ 0.998) was observed over the range of 5-2000 ng/mL of metformin, with the lower limit of quantification of 2.3 ng/mL. The intraday and interday precision (relative standard deviation) values were <13%, and the accuracy (relative error) was <-10% for metformin concentrations. The assay was sensitive to follow the pharmacokinetics of metformin in humans during a dosing interval after an oral dose at steady state. Metformin pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated in 8 patients exposed to CM. The mean C(max) of 1.9 ± 0.6 mg/L was attained at 4.1 ± 1.9 hours. There was no evidence of any drug accumulation or altered elimination due to the exposure to CM in the current population. ClCr showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) before (92.8 ± 11.3 mL/min) and after 48 hours (90.5 ± 10.5 mL/min) of exposure to CM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the recommendation to withhold metformin in diabetic patients during CM exposure could be revised to withholding the drug only in patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction.

Management of metformin-associated lactic acidosis by continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is a severe metabolic failure with high related mortality. Although its use is controversial, intermittent hemodialysis is reported to be the most frequently used treatment in conjunction with nonspecific supportive measures. Our aim was to report the evolution and outcome of cases managed by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Over a 3-year period, we retrospectively identified patients admitted to the intensive care unit for severe lactic acidosis caused by metformin. We included patients in our study who were treated with CRRT because of shock. We describe their clinical and biological features at admission and during renal support, as well as their evolution. We enrolled six patients with severe lactic acidosis; the mean pH and mean lactate was 6.92±0.20 and 14.4±5.1 mmol/l, respectively. Patients had high illness severity scores, including the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (average score 63±12 points). Early CRRT comprised either venovenous hemofiltration (n = 3) or hemodiafiltration (n = 3) with a mean effluent flow rate of 34±6 ml/kg/h. Metabolic acidosis control and metformin elimination was rapid and there was no rebound. Outcome was favorable in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Standard use of CRRT efficiently treated MALA in association with symptomatic organ supportive therapies.

Does high-dose metformin cause lactic acidosis in type 2 diabetic patients after CABG surgery? A double blind randomized clinical trial

Metformin is a dimethyl biguanide oral anti-hyperglycemic agent. Lactic acidosis due to metformin is a fatal metabolic condition that limits its use in patients in poor clinical condition, consequently reducing the number of patients who benefit from this medication. In a double blind randomized clinical trial, we investigated 200 type 2 diabetic patients after coronary artery bypass surgery in the open heart ICU of the Mazandaran Heart Center, and randomly assigned them to equal intervention and control groups. The intervention group received regular insulin infusion along with 2 metformin 500 mg tablets every twelve hours, while the control group received only intravenous insulin with 2 placebo tablets every twelve hours. Lactate level, pH, base excess, blood glucose and serum creatinine were measured over five 12 h periods, with data averaged for each period. The primary outcome in this study was high lactate levels. Comparison between the 2 groups was made by independent Student’s t-test. To compare changes in multiple measures in each group and analysis of group interaction, a repeated measurement ANOVA test was used.

There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding pH, base excess, or bicarbonate intake (P>0.05). No patient showed lactic acidosis in either group. Lactate levels were 23.0 vs 23.4 in the insulin-metformin and insulin only groups when the study was started, respectively. At the end of the study, those levels were 18.7 vs 18.9, respectively. In addition, the ANOVA repeated measurement test did not show a significant difference in terms of changes in the amount of lactate level between the 2 groups during the five measurement tests of the study period (P>0.05).

High-dose metformin (1,000 mg twice daily with insulin) does not cause lactic acidosis in type 2 diabetic patients after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Insulin resistance and the long-term consequences of polycystic ovary syndrome

In a significant number of women with the polycystic ovary syndrome there is impaired insulin metabolism with hypersecretion of insulin. Insulin resistance is defined as a diminution in the glucose response to a given amount of insulin. Insulin resistance has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many aspects of the syndrome. Hyperinsulinaemia leads to increased production of androgens resulting in anovulatory infertility. Women and particularly obese women with insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome have an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes and also type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in later life. The women should be counselled about long-term health risks, and obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome should be periodically screened. Lifestyle modification to reduce weight in obese women and treatment with insulin-sensitising drugs such as metformin in women with glucose intolerance result in the improvement of some metabolic abnormalities and hyperandrogenic disorders with the consequent restoration of normal menstrual and ovulatory function in a significant number of women with polycystic ovaries.

Outcome of severe lactic acidosis associated with metformin accumulation

Introduction

Metformin associated lactic acidosis (MALA) may complicate metformin therapy, particularly if metformin accumulates due to renal dysfunction. Profound lactic acidosis (LA) generally predicts poor outcome. We aimed to determine if MALA differs in outcome from LA of other origin (LAOO).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with LA to our medical ICU of a tertiary referral center during a 5-year period. MALA patients and LAOO patients were compared with respect to parameters of acid-base balance, serum creatinine, hospital outcome, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, using Pearson's Chi-square or the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

Of 197 patients admitted with LA, 10 had been diagnosed with MALA. With MALA, median arterial blood pH was significantly lower (6.78 [range 6.5 to 6.94]) and serum lactate significantly higher (18.7 ± 5.3 mmol/L) than with LAOO (pH 7.20 [range 6.46 to 7.35], mean serum lactate 11.2 ± 6.1 mmol/L). Overall mortality, however, was comparable (MALA 50%, LAOO 74%). Furthermore, survival of patients with arterial blood pH < 7.00 (N = 41) was significantly better (50% vs. 0%) if MALA (N = 10) was the underlying condition compared to LAOO (N = 31).

Conclusions

Compared to similarly severe lactic acidosis of other origin, the prognosis of MALA is significantly better. MALA should be considered in metformin-treated patients presenting with lactic acidosis.

Lactic acidosis induced by metformin: incidence, management and prevention

Lactic acidosis associated with metformin treatment is a rare but important adverse event, and unravelling the problem is critical. First, this potential event still influences treatment strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in the many patients at risk of kidney failure, in those presenting contraindications to metformin and in the elderly. Second, the relationship between metformin and lactic acidosis is complex, since use of the drug may be causal, co-responsible or coincidental. The present review is divided into three parts, dealing with the incidence, management and prevention of lactic acidosis occurring during metformin treatment. In terms of incidence, the objective of this article is to counter the conventional view of the link between metformin and lactic acidosis, according to which metformin-associated lactic acidosis is rare but is still associated with a high rate of mortality. In fact, the direct metformin-related mortality is close to zero and metformin may even be protective in cases of very severe lactic acidosis unrelated to the drug. Metformin has also inherited a negative class effect, since the early biguanide, phenformin, was associated with more frequent and sometimes fatal lactic acidosis. In the second part of this review, the objective is to identify the most efficient patient management methods based on our knowledge of how metformin acts on glucose/lactate metabolism and how lactic acidosis may occur (at the organ and cellular levels) during metformin treatment. The liver appears to be a key organ for both the antidiabetic effect of metformin and the development of lactic acidosis; the latter is attributed to mitochondrial impairment and subsequent adenosine triphosphate depletion, acceleration of the glycolytic flux, increased glucose uptake and the generation of lactate, which effluxes into the circulation rather than being oxidized further. Haemodialysis should systematically be performed in severe forms of lactic acidosis, since it provides both symptomatic and aetiological treatment (by eliminating lactate and metformin). In the third part of the review (prevention), the objective is to examine the list of contraindications to metformin (primarily related to renal and cardiovascular function). Diabetes is above all a vascular disease and metformin is a vascular drug with antidiabetic properties. Given the importance of the liver in lactate clearance, we suggest focusing on the severity of and prognosis for liver disease; renal dysfunction is only a prerequisite for metformin accumulation, which may only be dangerous per se when associated with liver failure. Lastly, in view of metformin's impressive overall effectiveness profile, it would be paradoxical to deny the majority of patients with long-established diabetes access to metformin because of the high prevalence of contraindications. The implications of these contraindications are discussed.

Metformin and lactic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes--from pride and prejudice to sense and sensibility

AIM

To present the cases of lactic acidosis encountered in our department among metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients and to investigate the role of contraindications to metformin use.

METHODS

A survey of medical records of metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients hospitalised for various medical conditions during the years 2004-2005 who exhibited elevated serum concentrations of lactic acid.

RESULTS

Seven metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients were identified who were not attending our department and were hospitalised with elevated serum lactic acid levels (6 developed lactic acidosis). All patients had one or more contraindications to metformin use. Outcome was favourable in 6 patients, while 1 patient with hepatocellular carcinoma died of liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

So far, metformin is one of the safest first-line oral hypoglycaemic agents. However, caution is needed to avoid patients with evident contraindications. This highlights the need for the practitioner to possess sound clinical judgement when prescribing metformin.

Metformin therapy and clinical uses

Metformin is now established as a first-line antidiabetic therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes. Its early use in treatment algorithms is supported by lack of weight gain, low risk of hypoglycaemia and its mode of action to counter insulin resistance. The drug's anti-atherosclerotic and cardioprotective effects have recently been confirmed in prospective and retrospective studies, and appear to reflect a collection of glucose-independent effects on the vascular endothelium, suppressant effects on glycation, oxidative stress and formation of adhesion molecules, stimulation of fibrinolysis and favourable effects on the lipid profile. Although avoidance of troublesome gastrointestinal tolerability issues requires careful dose titration, the risk of serious adverse events is considered low provided that contra-indications (especially with respect to renal function) are observed. As many of its actions go beyond glucose lowering, emerging evidence indicates potential benefits in other insulin-resistant states and possibly tumour suppression.

How does blood glucose control with metformin influence intensive insulin protocols? Evidence for involvement of oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines

INTRODUCTION

Recent investigations have revealed that control of hyperglycaemia with insulin improves outcomes. The cornerstone of hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients is insulin resistance and it remains refractory to intensive insulin protocols. We designed this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new intensive insulin therapy (IIT) protocol combined with metformin.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and a blood glucose level of >120 mg/dl admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were randomised to receive either intravenous infusion of IIT alone (n=11) or combined with metformin (IIT+MET; n=10) to maintain a blood glucose level (BGL) of 80-120 mg/dl. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 48 hours, 96 hours and 7 days after initiation of the study. Samples were analysed for interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and nitric oxide (NO) as inflammatory mediators; plasminogen activation inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as a coagulation mediator; and thiobarbituric reactive substances (TBARS), total antioxidant power (TAP) and total thiol molecules (TTM) as oxidative stress parameters.

RESULTS

The addition of metformin to the IIT protocol decreased insulin requirement and concentration of insulin and C-peptide. With both treatments at most time points, the mean plasma levels of IL-6, TNF-alpha, NO, PAI-1 and TBARS were found to be significantly lower compared with baseline. Antioxidant activity was increased in both arms with increasing TAP and TTM (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding reported beneficial effects on these parameters. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) score, an index of nursing workload and number of therapeutic interventions, decreased in the IIT+MET group (P<0.01). We did not observe any occurrence of hyperlactataemia or acidosis in the IIT+MET group.

CONCLUSION

Metformin plus insulin appears to lower the incidence of insulin resistance, lower insulin requirement while maintaining blood glucose level control, and consequently lower the incidence of adverse effects related to high-dose insulin therapy, particularly hypoglycaemia, and also declined nursing workload. Both treatment protocols showed improvements in inflammatory cytokine levels. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to determine the undiscovered facts of insulin-sensitising agents in critically ill patients.

Effect of metformin on survival rate in experimental sepsis

AIM

Because "metformin-associated lactic acidosis" refers to metformin and concurrent pathologies as co-precipitating factors, the respective impact in the outcome of metformin therapy, metformin accumulation, and general diseases should be determined. We therefore constructed a model of sepsis in mice treated with metformin at a dose corresponding to clinical practice, or to accumulation.

METHODS

460 mice were separated in 3 groups: no metformin therapy, a 7-day metformin therapy at 50 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) (MET50) or 500 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) (MET500). Blood was drawn on day 7 in 40 metformin-treated animals for determining metformin concentrations. The 420 other mice were divided in 14 subgroups according to the amount of an intra-peritoneal inoculum of E. coli ranging from 5.103 to 1010 CFU/ml in order to construct a lethal dose curve. The survival rate was assessed at 7, 13, 24, 36, 60 and 120 hours thereafter.

RESULTS

Plasma metformin concentrations were 0.26 +/- 0.13 mg/l in MET50, and 4.63 +/- 1.92 mg/l in MET500. The comparative analysis of the survival rates at 120 hours showed no difference of mortality, always occurring for an inoculum amount > 10(8) CFU/ml. Comparing the survival rates from time 0 to 120 hours using Kaplan-Meyer curves and the Logrank test, there was no difference between the different groups.

CONCLUSION

Metformin, even at a dose mimicking accumulation, does not aggravate the mortality rate in this model of sepsis. Consequently, metformin can not be considered as toxic in such a condition.

Insulin-sensitizing agents: use in pregnancy and as therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome

Treatment with insulin-sensitizing agents is a relatively recent therapeutic strategy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and insulin resistance. The key areas addressed in this review include PCOS and the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes, as well as the use of insulin-sensitizing agents, particularly metformin, in the management of infertility in obese and non-obese PCOS women. Treatment with metformin in PCOS women undergoing IVF and the use of metformin during gestation will be discussed. The challenge for the health care professional should be the appropriate utilization of pharmacotherapies to improve insulin sensitivity and lower circulating insulin levels resulting in beneficial changes in PCOS phenotype. Further research into the potential role of other insulin-sensitizing agents, such as pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, in the treatment of infertile women with PCOS is needed.

Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive and complex disorder that is difficult to treat effectively in the long term. The majority of patients are overweight or obese at diagnosis and will be unable to achieve or sustain near normoglycaemia without oral antidiabetic agents; a sizeable proportion of patients will eventually require insulin therapy to maintain long-term glycaemic control, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with oral antidiabetic therapy. The frequent need for escalating therapy is held to reflect progressive loss of islet beta-cell function, usually in the presence of obesity-related insulin resistance. Today's clinicians are presented with an extensive range of oral antidiabetic drugs for type 2 diabetes. The main classes are heterogeneous in their modes of action, safety profiles and tolerability. These main classes include agents that stimulate insulin secretion (sulphonylureas and rapid-acting secretagogues), reduce hepatic glucose production (biguanides), delay digestion and absorption of intestinal carbohydrate (alpha-glucosidase inhibitors) or improve insulin action (thiazolidinediones). The UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) demonstrated the benefits of intensified glycaemic control on microvascular complications in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the picture was less clearcut with regard to macrovascular disease, with neither sulphonylureas nor insulin significantly reducing cardiovascular events. The impact of oral antidiabetic agents on atherosclerosis--beyond expected effects on glycaemic control--is an increasingly important consideration. In the UKPDS, overweight and obese patients randomised to initial monotherapy with metformin experienced significant reductions in myocardial infarction and diabetes-related deaths. Metformin does not promote weight gain and has beneficial effects on several cardiovascular risk factors. Accordingly, metformin is widely regarded as the drug of choice for most patients with type 2 diabetes. Concern about cardiovascular safety of sulphonylureas has largely dissipated with generally reassuring results from clinical trials, including the UKPDS. Encouragingly, the recent Steno-2 Study showed that intensive target-driven, multifactorial approach to management, based around a sulphonylurea, reduced the risk of both micro- and macrovascular complications in high-risk patients. Theoretical advantages of selectively targeting postprandial hyperglycaemia require confirmation in clinical trials of drugs with preferential effects on this facet of hyperglycaemia are currently in progress. The insulin-sensitising thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic agents has potentially advantageous effects on multiple components of the metabolic syndrome; the results of clinical trials with cardiovascular endpoints are awaited. The selection of initial monotherapy is based on a clinical and biochemical assessment of the patient, safety considerations being paramount. In some circumstances, for example pregnancy or severe hepatic or renal impairment, insulin may be the treatment of choice when nonpharmacological measures prove inadequate. Insulin is also required for metabolic decompensation, that is, incipient or actual diabetic ketoacidosis, or non-ketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycaemia. Certain comorbidities, for example presentation with myocardial infarction during other acute intercurrent illness, may make insulin the best option. Oral antidiabetic agents should be initiated at a low dose and titrated up according to glycaemic response, as judged by measurement of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, supplemented in some patients by self monitoring of capillary blood glucose. The average glucose-lowering effect of the major classes of oral antidiabetic agents is broadly similar (averaging a 1-2% reduction in HbA1c), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors being rather less effective. Tailoring the treatment to the individual patient is an important principle. Doses are gradually titrated up according to response. However, the maximal glucose-lowering action for sulphonylureas is usually attained at appreciably lower doses (approximately 50%) than the manufacturers' recommended daily maximum. Combinations of certain agents, for example a secretagogue plus a biguanide or a thiazolidinedione, are logical and widely used, and combination preparations are now available in some countries. While the benefits of metformin added to a sulphonylurea were initially less favourable in the UKPDS, longer-term data have allayed concern. When considering long-term therapy, issues such as tolerability and convenience are important additional considerations. Neither sulphonylureas nor biguanides are able to appreciably alter the rate of progression of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Preliminary data suggesting that thiazolidinediones may provide better long-term glycaemic stability are currently being tested in clinical trials; current evidence, while encouraging, is not conclusive. Delayed progression from glucose intolerance to type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with glucose intolerance has been demonstrated with troglitazone, metformin and acarbose. However, intensive lifestyle intervention can be more effective than drug therapy, at least in the setting of interventional clinical trials. No antidiabetic drugs are presently licensed for use in prediabetic individuals.

Do risk factors for lactic acidosis influence dosing of metformin?

BACKGROUND

Metformin is commonly prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, however it is associated with the potentially lethal condition of lactic acidosis. Prescribing guidelines have been developed to minimize the risk of lactic acidosis development, although some suggest they are inappropriate and have created confusion amongst prescribers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether metformin dose was influenced by the presence of risk factors for lactic acidosis.

METHODS

The study was prospective, and retrieved information from patients admitted to hospital who were prescribed metformin at their time of admission.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included in the study, 60 of whom had a least one risk factor for lactic acidosis. Of those 60 patients, 78.3% had a dose adjustment, with renal impairment, hepatic impairment, surgery and use of radiological contrast media--the risk factors most likely to result in a dose adjustment. When dose adjustments did occur, metformin was withheld on 88.7% of occasions.

CONCLUSION

Metformin dose was influenced by the presence of risk factors for lactic acidosis, although it was dependent upon the number and particular risk factor/s present.

Potential Adjunctive Therapies in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Appropriate insulin therapy is central to the management of all individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The potential role of adjunctive therapy in type 1 diabetes is to improve insulin action, and facilitate the ability of all individuals with type 1 diabetes to achieve and maintain 'better' metabolic control. The landmark clinical trial in type 1 diabetes is the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The DCCT showed that there is no threshold below which a reduction in glycemia would not provide further benefit against diabetes-related microvascular complications. This study in particular provides the rationale for attempting to achieve as near normoglycemia as possible. We review the use of recognized pharmacologic agents as potential insulin adjunctives in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Adjunctive therapies can be grouped into the following categories based on their putative mechanism of action: enhancement of insulin action (e.g. the biguanides and thiazolidinediones), alteration of gastrointestinal nutrient delivery (e.g. acarbose and amylin), and other targets of action (e.g. pirenzepine and insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1], which reduce growth hormone secretion, and glucagon-like peptide-1, which acts to stimulate insulin secretion). Many of these agents have been found to be effective in short-term studies with decreases in glycosylated hemoglobin of 0.5-1.0%, lowered postprandial blood glucose levels, and decreased daily insulin doses. Adverse effects such as poor gastrointestinal tolerability (metformin, acarbose) or potential acceleration of retinopathy (IGF-1) indicates the need for further studies of efficacy, safety, and patient selection before these adjunctive therapies can be widely recommended in type 1 diabetes.

Glyburide/metformin tablets: a new therapeutic option for the management of Type 2 diabetes

Oral antidiabetic combination therapy is a proven means of establishing glycaemic control in the hyperglycaemic, Type 2 diabetic patient, but co-administering two oral antidiabetic agents separately may hinder compliance with therapy. A new single-tablet of glyburide/metformin combination therapy (Glucovance), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc.) has recently been developed, which addresses the primary defects of Type 2 diabetes: beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. The glyburide/metformin tablet, taken with meals, is designed to optimise the absorption of glyburide and to address the postprandial glucose rise. Glyburide/metformin tablets are more effective in controlling fasting and postprandial glycaemia than its component monotherapies, at lower doses of metformin and glyburide compared with monotherapy because of the synergy between its glyburide and metformin components. Moreover, a double-blind study showed that glyburide/metformin tablets are more effective than a free combination of glyburide co-administered with metformin in controlling postprandial glucose. Retrospective analyses suggested that glyburide/metformin tablets control glycated haemoglobin (A1C) more effectively than a free combination of glyburide co-administered with metformin, at lower mean doses of glyburide and metformin. The incidence of side effects is lower than separate component therapy for any given A1C. Glyburide/metformin tablets are an effective option for optimising the control of blood glucose in Type 2 diabetic patients and appear to enhance adherence to therapy.

Kinetics of plasma and erythrocyte metformin after acute administration in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVES

Although the existence of a deep compartment for metformin has long been hypothesized, there is still little direct information concerning metformin distribution in individual tissues in man. The only available study involves chronic metformin therapy. In that study, the measurement of metformin in erythrocytes provided a reliable indicator of metformin distribution and of potential accumulation. To determine the kinetics of metformin in plasma and in erythrocytes after acute oral administration, we performed the present study in healthy subjects after a single oral dose of metformin and compared the pharmacokinetics parameters in erythrocytes to those in plasma.

METHODS

Six nondiabetic participants took the study dose of 850 mg metformin at 8: 00 AM after a non-standardized breakfast (i.e., as recommended in clinical practice). Blood samples were collected for metformin measurement in plasma and in erythrocytes at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 24, 33, 48, 57, and 72 h.

RESULTS

Maximum metformin concentration was attained at 3.0 +/- 0.3 h in plasma and 4.7 +/- 0.5 h in erythrocytes. This difference was not significant. Metformin concentrations peaked at a maximum almost 6 times higher in plasma than in erythrocytes (1.7 +/- 0.1 and 0.3 +/- 0.0 mg/l, respectively). However, because the elimination half-life of metformin was much longer in erythrocytes (23.4 +/- 1.9 h vs. 2.7 +/- 1.2 h), there was no difference in area under the curve between plasma and erythrocytes. The distribution volume (plasma) was calculated to be 146 +/- 11 l. Plasma and erythrocytes concentration-time curves showed that metformin was not detectable in plasma 24 hours after the oral administration, while it remained detectable in erythrocytes up to 48 hours. Metformin concentrations crossed approximately 13 hours after having reached their maximum values in plasma, approximately 16 h after metformin intake.

CONCLUSION

Having demonstrated the rapid elimination of metformin from plasma and its slow disappearance from erythrocytes, the presents results should contribute to adjustment of metformin dosage to renal function, assessment of drug compliance, and retrospective analysis (when blood samples are drawn with delay) of the link between metformin and development of lactic acidosis. Most importantly, the present findings should help to ascertain the optimal dosage of metformin, particularly in elderly patients.

Involvement of organic cation transporter 1 in the lactic acidosis caused by metformin

Biguanides are a class of drugs widely used as oral antihyperglycemic agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, but they are associated with lactic acidosis, a lethal side effect. We reported previously that biguanides are good substrates of rat organic cation transporter 1 (Oct1; Slc22a1) and, using Oct1(-/-) mice, that mouse Oct1 is responsible for the hepatic uptake of a biguanide, metformin. In the present study, we investigated whether the liver is the key organ for the lactic acidosis. When mice were given metformin, the blood lactate concentration significantly increased in the wild-type mice, whereas only a slight increase was observed in Oct1(-/-) mice. The plasma concentration of metformin exhibited similar time profiles between the wild-type and Oct1(-/-) mice, suggesting that the liver is the key organ responsible for the lactic acidosis. Furthermore, the extent of the increase in blood lactate caused by three different biguanides (metformin, buformin, and phenformin) was compared with the abilities to reduce oxygen consumption in isolated rat hepatocytes. When rats were given each of these biguanides, the lactate concentration increased significantly. This effect was dose-dependent, and the EC(50) values of metformin, buformin, and phenformin were 734, 119, and 4.97 microM, respectively. All of these biguanides reduced the oxygen consumption by isolated rat hepatocytes in a concentration-dependent manner. When the concentration required to reduce the oxygen consumption to 75% of the control value (from 0.40 to 0.29 micromol/min/mg protein) was compared with the EC(50) value obtained in vivo, a clear correlation was observed among the three biguanides, suggesting that oxygen consumption in isolated rat hepatocytes can be used as an index of the incidence of lactic acidosis.

Mild acute renal failure potentiates metformin accumulation in the diabetic rat kidney without further impairment of renal function

OBJECTIVES

To analyze, in acute renal failure (ARF) in diabetic rats, how moderate functional ARF would modify metformin (MET) pharmacokinetics and if plasma and renal tissue MET accumulation could aggravate renal insufficiency and/or elicit plasma lactate accumulation.

METHODS

Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were allocated to four groups: control, MET, ARF, ARF-MET (6-7 rats per group). MET (100 mg/kg/day) was given per os for two weeks before ARF was induced by drinking restriction and enalapril treatment. The effects of MET and/or ARF were examined in vivo on renal function in conscious rats (metabolic cages) and ex vivo on renal vascular reactivity (isolated kidney).

RESULTS

MET treatment (plasma level: 5.3 +/- 1.4 microg/ml, mean+/-SEM), resulted in biguanide accumulation in cortex and medulla (53 +/- 17 and 80 +/- 40 microg/g respectively). MET was devoid of any effect on creatinine clearance, mean blood pressure or renal vascular resistance, but moderately increased plasma lactate (3.8 +/- 0.5 vs 3.2 +/- 0.2 mM, P<0.05) and decreased angiotensin II-induced renal vasoconstriction. ARF, although mild, decreased renal MET clearance (0.29 +/- 0.05 vs 1.01 +/- 0.31 ml/min/100 g, P<0.05) and increased plasma and renal tissue MET levels (x 2-4). MET however did not worsen the fall in glomerular filtration rate, nor modify renal vascular reactivity. ARF did not change the MET-elicited moderate increase in plasma lactate.

CONCLUSION

Despite the increase in MET plasma and renal tissue levels subsequent to moderate ARF, no harmful metabolic effect on plasma lactate and no further impairment of renal function was observed in MET-treated diabetic rats subjected to ARF.

Measurement of metformin concentration in erythrocytes: clinical implications

AIMS

Although pharmacokinetics studies have long suggested a deep compartment for the antidiabetic drug metformin, there is still little information concerning metformin accumulation by individual tissues in man. In the present study, the erythrocyte was chosen to represent this putative deep compartment and metformin concentration in erythrocytes (EM) was compared with that in plasma (PM) to delineate clinical implications.

METHODS

A reference group of 58 patients with well-tolerated metformin treatment was studied to provide standard mean metformin concentrations in the fasting state. Secondly, to provide transverse data reflecting clinical practice, the authors reviewed an investigation group of 93 metformin-treated patients with available PM and EM, which had been requested either to adjust metformin dosage to renal function, or to screen for potential metformin accumulation following renal failure, metformin overdose or lactic acidosis. Thirdly, the case of an individual with major metformin accumulation was studied to provide information about metformin elimination.

RESULTS

From the bulk of data, we performed three types of analyses: (1) PM and EM were compared. In the investigation group, this comparison was extended to subgroups separated according to low-to-normal, moderately increased or highly increased metformin concentration. (2) Correlative analyses of PM, EM and serum creatinine were performed. (3) A kinetic study of the spontaneous decline of PM and EM was conducted. PM and EM were, respectively, 0.5 +/- 0.4 mg/l and 0.8 +/- 0.4 mg/l in the reference group, and 11.7 +/- 17.8 mg/l (mean +/- SD, range 0.0-71.9 mg/l) and 7.5 +/- 9.4 mg/l (0.0-34 mg/l) in the investigation group, mean serum creatinine of which was 290 +/- 258 micro mol/l. In the low-to-normal PM subgroup (n = 28), PM and EM were, respectively, 0.39 +/- 0.38 mg/l and 0.84 +/- 0.68 mg/l (p < 0.001). In the moderately increased PM subgroup (from therapeutic concentrations +2 SD to 5 mg/l, n = 24), PM and EM were 2.82 +/- 1.13 mg/l and 2.72 +/- 2.03 mg/l (NS). In the sharply increased PM subgroup (> 5 mg/l, n = 41), PM and EM were 27.6 +/- 23.2 mg/l and 17.0 +/- 11.4 mg/l (p = < 0.001). PM and EM were tightly correlated (r = 0.72 in the reference group and r = 0.90 in the investigation group, p < 0.001 for both). Metformin concentrations were also correlated with those of serum creatinine, but more so in the investigation group; in subgroups, a positive correlation was found only at high metformin concentrations and in erythrocytes. The kinetic study performed in the patient with major metformin accumulation showed that PM and EM dropped within less than 3 days from a maximum concentration of 80.0 mg/l and 20.4 mg/l, respectively, to 0.67 mg/l and 6.52 mg/l.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, metformin appears to accumulate in erythrocytes and, consequently, may be part of a deep compartment for the drug. This evidence of slow decline in erythrocyte metformin concentration may contribute to retrospective diagnosis of metformin accumulation and to refinements in adjusting metformin dosage to renal function.