Determination of access blood flow from ionic dialysance: theory and validation

Hemodialysis access flow measurement: Comparison of ultrasound dilution and ultrafiltration method on NIKKISO DBB-EXA™ dialysis machine

BACKGROUND

The methods of estimating vascular access (VA) flow rates are usually based on the indicator dilution theory by measuring recirculation during dialysis sessions.

METHODS

This is an observational study comparing the VA flow rates measured by NIKKISO DBB-EXA™ and Transonic®. Sixty-five patients (38 M/27 F, mean age 72 ± 10 years) participated in the study. We measured the VA flow rates during dialysis twice with each method and repeated the procedure 7 days later.

RESULTS

In 130 double measurements for each method on the same day, mean flow with Transonic® was 1413±715 ml/min and with DBB-EXA™ 1297 ± 664 ml/min. In Bland-Altman analysis, the mean difference between the two methods was 159 ± 211 ml/min (limits of agreement: -274 and 572 ml/min). Eighty-one out of the 130 DBB-EXA™ measurements were within 25% of the Transonic® measurements (62% accuracy). Regarding reproducibility of each method on different days, mean difference in the Bland-Altman analysis was 29 ± 620 ml/min (limits of agreement: -1186 and 1244 ml/min) for the Transonic® measurements and 132 ± 625 ml/min (limits of agreement: -1092 and 1356 ml/min) for the DBB-EXA™ measurements. The measurements on two different days were within 25% of each other for 52 of the 65 patients (80%) with the Transonic® method, and for 35 of the 65 patients (54%) with the DBB-EXA™ method.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the DBB-EXA™ method underestimates VA flow rates compared to the Transonic® technique, resulting in a limited accuracy of 62%. There was poor reproducibility for both methods in different day measurements with better performance of the Transonic® technique. The DBB-EXA™ method could be used as a simple tool for a rough estimate of VA flow rates but cannot replace the Transonic® reference method.

Routine online assessment of dialysis dose: Ionic dialysance or UV-absorbance monitoring?

For three-weekly hemodialysis, a single-pool Kt/V target of at least 1.4 together with a minimal dialysis dose Kt at 45 L for men and 40 L for women per each session is currently recommended. Fully automatic online calculation of Kt and Kt/V from conductivity or UV-absorbance measurements in the dialysate is standardly implemented on some hemodialysis monitors and makes it possible to estimate the dialysis dose without the need for blood or dialysate samples. Monitoring the UV-absorbance of the spent dialysate is the most direct method for estimating Kt/V as it does not require an estimate of V. Calculation of ionic dialysance from conductivity measurements is the most direct method for estimating Kt and BSA-scaled dialysis dose. Both ionic dialysance monitoring and UV-absorbance monitoring may help detect a change in urea clearance occurring during the session, but this change must be interpreted differently depending on the monitoring being considered. An abrupt decrease in urea clearance results in a decrease in ionic dialysance but, paradoxically, a sudden increase in estimated urea clearance provided by dialysate UV-absorbance monitoring. Healthcare teams who monitor both ionic dialysance and UV-absorbance in their hemodialysis units must be clearly informed of this difficulty.

Predicting arterio-venous fistula failure by urea-method derived access blood flow in chronic hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Dialysis access is an essential part of hemodialysis. Determining the access blood flow (Qa) can help predict arterio-venous fistula thrombosis. Qa determination by the urea method, which was previously described in the past is simple and is available in most of the dialysis units but was not be able to predict arterio-venous fistula thrombosis.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of Qa determination by the urea method and by ultrasound dilution methods in predicting arterio-venous fistula failure.

METHODS

Qa was measured by urea method and by ultrasound dilution simultaneously, every 3 months for a period of 1 year, in stable chronic hemodialysis patients with arterio-venous fistula. Arterio-venous fistula failure determined by clinical parameters and confirmed by Doppler ultrasound before sending the patient for interventional angioplasty.

RESULTS

This study enrolled a total of 16 patients, with 63% being male, 75% with lower-arm arterio-venous fistula and around 43% with previously done angioplasty. 59-Qa measurements were done, and 6 patients underwent angioplasty (one patient for severe upper limb edema, one for access thrombosis, and four for access dysfunction). Qa determination by the urea method had non-significantly lower Qa, (745 mL/min (interquartile range: 509-1143) and 779 mL/min (interquartile range: 530-1160), (p = 0.58)) and high correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) to Qa by ultrasound dilution. The cut-off criteria with its sensitivity and specificity in predicting the access failure were 440 mL/min, 66.67%, and 96.15% for Qa determination by the urea and 400 mL/min, 66.67% and 90.38% for Qa by ultrasound dilution, respectively, with no difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of Qa determination by the urea method is well correlated with Qa by ultrasound dilution and can be used to predict vascular access failure.

Sentinel vascular access monitoring after endovascular intervention predicts access outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The vascular access pressure ratio test identifies dialysis vascular access dysfunction when three consecutive vascular access pressure ratios are >0.55. We tested whether the magnitude of the decline in vascular access pressure ratio 1-week post-intervention could alert of subsequent access failure.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

The retrospective study included all vascular access procedures at one institution from March 2014 to June 2016. Data included demographics, comorbidities, vascular access features, %ΔVAPR = ((Pre-Post)/Pre] × 100% assessed within the first 2 weeks post-percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty, time-to-next procedure, and patency. The log-rank test compared the area under the curve, receiver operating curve, Kaplan-Meier arteriovenous graft and arteriovenous fistula survival curves. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard (CP) model was used to determine the association of %ΔVAPR with access patency.

RESULTS

Analysis of 138 subjects (females 51%; Black 87%) included 64 arteriovenous fistulas with 104 angioplasties and 74 arteriovenous grafts with 134 angioplasties. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for fistula failure at 3 months was 0.59, with optimal screening characteristics of 33.3%, sensitivity of 56.1%, and specificity of 63.2%. Arteriovenous fistula with <33.3% decline compared to >33.3% required earlier subsequent procedure (136 vs 231 days), lower survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.01), and twofold greater risk of failure (P = .006). Area under the receiver operating characteristic for arteriovenous graft failure at 3 months had a sensitivity of 52.3% and specificity of 67.4%. Arteriovenous graft with a post-intervention vascular access pressure ratio decline of <28.8% also required earlier subsequent procedure (144 vs 189 days), lower survival on Kaplan-Meier (P = 0.04), and a 59% higher risk for failure. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for combined access failure (arteriovenous fistula + arteriovenous graft) at 3 months had an optimal cut-point value of 31.2%, a sensitivity of 54.6%, and a specificity of 63.1%. Access with a <31.2% drop had a 62% increase in the risk of failure (hazard ratio 1.62; confidence interval 1.16, 2.27; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of post-intervention reduction in vascular access pressure ratio provides a novel predictive measure of access outcomes.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Comparison of ultrasound scan blood flow measurement versus other forms of surveillance in the thrombosis rate of hemodialysis access: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefit of access flow surveillance in preventing vascular access thrombosis and failure remains controversial, as many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to demonstrate consistent results. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis including newly published RCTs with a subgroup analysis for arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).

METHODS

A systematic review of the available literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. An electronic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases of RCTs conducted from 1970 to 2017 that involved access flow surveillance. As a result, 9 RCTs met our criteria. The control group was defined by indirect and various surveillance methods such as dynamic venous pressure measurement and physical examination. Conversely, the interventional group was defined as a noninvasive duplex ultrasound scan (USS) or ultrasound dilution that directly measured the flow of vascular access.

RESULTS

The studies included 990 patients comprising 658 native AVFs and 332 AVGs. The prevalence of diabetes was 29.3%and 30.5% in the interventional and control groups, respectively. The estimated overall pooled risk ratio (RR) of thrombosis was 0.782 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.553-1.107; P = .17], favoring interventional group, although this was not statistically significant. In the subgroup analysis, the pooled RR of thrombosis was .562 (95% CI, 0.346-0.915; P = .02) for AVFs, which significantly favored the interventional group. Conversely, the pooled RR for AVGs was 1.104 (95% CI, 0.672-1.816; P = .70).

CONCLUSION

The surveillance method to measure access flow through USS showed a significant benefit for reducing thrombosis in AVFs. The result encourages adherence to the current guidelines for AVFs. However, no benefit was found regarding AVGs. Recent guidelines with a "one-size-fits-all" approach may be revised to a "tailored-to-risk" approach.

Monitoring and Surveillance of Hemodialysis Access

Access surveillance using invasive or noninvasive methods with an objective to improve access patency and decrease hospital admissions for access dysfunction in dialysis population has been promoted, but its success to predict incipient thrombosis and subsequent access failure is a controversial topic. Some studies have shown improvement in access outcomes, while others have failed to demonstrate an ideal method to diagnose access problems. Furthermore, the use of endovascular interventions such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to timely correct access problem might itself be a promoter of neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis during balloon angioplasty. There are significant costs and efforts associated with routine dialysis surveillance; therefore, it is necessary to understand whether such programs will help improve access-related problems and guarantee adequate dialysis care. It is generally agreed upon that despite the lack of guaranteed success of surveillance, such strategies have helped improve dialysis management, resulted in decreased costs and hospitalizations, and represented clinically relevant indications of failure prior to planning any radiological or surgical intervention. In this study, the authors review monitoring and surveillance measures in place, and their associated merits and limitations to detect stenosis and prevent incidences of vascular access thrombosis.

Clinical evaluation of an expert system for arteriovenous fistula assessment

The monitoring of ionic dialysance in hemodialysis allows early detection of arterio-venous fistula stenosis. One limitation to the practical use of ionic dialysance is that the analysis is very time consuming on a majority of normal cases.The purpose of the study is to evaluate the utility of an expert system reproducing a human analysis and allowing continuous monitoring of the ionic dialysance by helping the physician to focus his or her expertise on the abnormal cases.The method is based on a Bayesian model that analyzes the blood flow rate, the ionic dialysance, and the venous and arterial pressures measured on the extra corporeal circuit.The clinical evaluation was performed on 90 dialysis patients at the hospital dialysis center of Saint Brieux in France with a history of at least four consecutive months of validated recording. The retrospective automated analysis was evaluated in comparison to vascular access problems identified from invasive investigation or treatment. The sensitivity of the automated analysis is 92% with a specificity of 75%.As a conclusion we suggest that this expert system could be used in a continuous vascular access monitoring procedure consisting in a weekly review of the patient population at the dialysis center. The patients with the highest risk score need a further investigation of their historical data and their medical history in order to decide whether or not to perform an invasive intervention.

Physiological monitoring and control in hemodialysis: state of the art and outlook

Medical devices for monitoring and feedback control of physiological parameters of the dialysis patient were introduced in the early 1990s. They have a wide range of applications, aiming at increasing the safety and ensuring the efficiency of the treatment, and at an improved restoration of physiological conditions, leading to an overall reduction in morbidity and mortality. Such devices include sensors for the measurement of temperature, optical parameters and sound speed in blood, and electrical characteristics of the human body, and other parameters. Essential for the development of these devices is a detailed understanding of the pathophysiological background of a therapeutical problem. There is still a large potential to introduce new devices for further therapy improvement and automation. Also, the size of the hemodialysis market appears attractive; however, a new product has to meet several specific requirements in order to also become commercially successful. This review describes the therapeutic and technical principles of several available devices, reports on concepts for possible future devices, and presents a short overview on the market environment.

Diagnosis of arteriovenous fistula dysfunction

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction remains a major contributor to the morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis patients. The failure of a newly created AVF to mature and development of stenosis in an established AVF are two common clinical predicaments. The goal is to identify a dysfunctional AVF early enough to intervene in a timely manner to either assist with the maturation process or to prevent thrombosis. The currently available tools in our armamentarium include clinical evaluation, physical examination of the AVF, and surveillance tests. Physical examination has been recognized as a simple and cost-effective tool, but is often not implemented either because of lack of training or time constraints. Surveillance tests include measurement of access flow or pressure as a surrogate marker of AVF dysfunction. Surveillance tests often require expensive equipment, additional personnel, and are controversial. Currently, there are guidelines and recommendations to include all of these measures while evaluating an AVF. Implementing judicious use of these tools in clinical practice can facilitate early diagnosis for timely intervention in the appropriate population. Furthermore, this strategy may avoid unnecessary interventions and assist with healthcare cost containment.

The measurement of hemodialysis access blood flow by a conductivity step method

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Measurement of blood flow rate (Qa) is used to monitor dialysis access, AV fistulas, and grafts. Indicator dilution measurements of the recirculation (R) induced by reversal of hemodialysis blood lines are commonly used. This plus the dialysis circuit flow (Qb) allows calculation of Qa. R also changes the conductivity, which can be measured by a conductivity cell in the spent dialysate. The change in conductivity caused by line reversal should vary with Qa. A methodology for Qa measurement utilizing this conductivity step is proposed. This study compares conductivity step methodology against the reference method of ultrasound dilution (Qa-Trans).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This was an open diagnostic test study in a single academic hospital setting involving 15 hemodialysis-dependent patients. Each was studied over four hemodialysis treatments. During each treatment, two pairs of Qa measurements (conductivity step and Trans) were made. Pre- and postdialysis sodium levels were also measured.

RESULTS

Average Qa-conductivity step was 1040 ml/min. Average Qa-Trans was 1030 ml/min. The difference was NS. The data pairs showed mean difference of 1.3 +/- 17% (SD). The SD indicates a relatively large variation between data pairs. There was significant linear correlation between the Qa-conductivity step and Qa-Trans results (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). Serum sodium rose slightly but significantly over dialysis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Qa measurement by conductivity step may be an acceptable alternative to ultrasound dilution methodology. Care must be taken to prevent salt loading when the conductivity step is used.

Higher arteriovenous fistulae blood flows are associated with a lower level of dialysis-induced cardiac injury

Native arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) remain the vascular access of choice for hemodialysis (HD). Despite being associated with superior long-term outcomes (cf. catheter use), little is known about the systemic hemodynamic consequences of AVFs. Repetitive myocardial injury (myocardial stunning) is an under-recognized common consequence of HD. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of AVF flow (Qa) on dialysis-induced cardiac injury. We studied 50 chronic HD patients. All patients underwent echocardiography (and subsequent quantitative offline analysis) at baseline, during and post dialysis, to assess left ventricular function and the development of regional wall motion abnormalities. Qa was measured using ionic dialysance. Patients were divided into Qa tertiles (<500, mean 291+/-101 mL/min, 500-1000, mean 739+/-130 mL/min and >1000, mean 1265+/-221 mL/min). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, diabetes, or resting ejection fraction. Patients with Qa>1000 mL/min had a lower prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (55% vs. 76%, P=0.01). Dialysis-induced myocardial stunning (seen in 65% of the patients studied) was significantly and sequentially reduced in those patients with higher Qas. This was seen in a lower number of segments and ventricular regions developing regional wall motion abnormalities, as well as a significantly reduced mean and cumulative percentage reduction in fractional shortening of those ventricular segments affected (-187+/-37%, -161+/-26%, and -101+/-25%, respectively, P=0.04). Relatively higher AVF flows appear to be associated with a lower level of observed HD-induced cardiac injury.

A method for monitoring vascular access function during hemodialysis

We tested a new bedside method to determine the function of native arteriovenous fistula in 16 patients performed during hemodialysis without stopping the treatment. We initially measured vascular access flow (Q(a)) in each patient using the Transonic HD01(plus) device. We then measured the pressure in arterial and venous drip chambers at different blood pump flow rates (Q(bset)=0, 50, 100, 250, 300, 350 ml/min). The intravascular blood pressure gradient (P(f)) between arterial and venous puncture sites was estimated by a mathematical model. P(f) was positive for low Q(bset), but became negative when Q(bset) overcame the threshold value (Q(Inv)). Such critical flow showed a high correlation with Q(a), even if it was systemically lower. Computer analysis of fluid dynamics showed that when the blood pump flow overcame the Q(Inv) threshold, a critical transition from laminar flow to vortex circulation took place downstream of the venous needle, causing a dangerous shearstress on the vessel wall. Our results show that Q(Inv) provides an indication of the maximal blood pump flow rate needed to be reached to maximize blood flow supply in order to limit hemodynamic stress on the vascular access.

Hemodialysis blood access flow rates can be estimated accurately from on-line dialysate urea measurements and the knowledge of effective dialyzer urea clearance

Measurement of blood flow rate (Qa) is used to monitor arteriovenous fistulas and grafts that are used for hemodialysis blood access. Most Qa measurements use indicator dilution techniques to measure the recirculation that is induced by the reversal of hemodialysis blood lines. R plus the dialysis circuit flow (Qb) allows the calculation of Qa. The principle of needle reversal also can be used with a dialysate urea monitor (e.g., DQM 200 [Gambro]) without injection of diluent; the effect of the reversal on urea concentration is observed. Access blood water flow rate (Qaw) in relation to the effective clearance (K) is found from the urea concentrations in the dialysate with needles in the normal (Cn) and reverse (Cr) positions: K/Qaw = (Cn - Cr)/Cr. Qa is calculated by adjusting Qaw for hematocrit and protein. For testing of this theoretical relationship, 20 patients who were dialyzed on Integra (Hospal) and Centrysystem 3 (Cobe) machines that were fitted with DQM 200 were studied. During each treatment, lines were reversed and Qa was measured by ultrasound velocity dilution (Transonic HD01 monitor); at the same time, Cn and Cr were measured by DQM 200 and K was calculated. K1 was determined from a predialysis blood urea concentration (Cb), initial dialysate urea concentration (Cd), dialysate flow rate (Qd), and the relationship K x Cb = Qd x Cd (K1). K was determined separately from a conductivity step method using Diascan (Hospal) attached to Integra machines only (K2). With the use of K1, 127 comparisons were made; a correlation existed (r = 0.916), although Bland-Altman analysis showed that the dialysate urea method gave a mean value 5.3% +/- 15.3 (+/-SD) higher than that of Transonic (P < 0.001). With the use of K2, there also was a correlation of (r = 0.944; n = 63), and Bland-Altman testing showed an NS difference of +3.5% between the dialysate urea and Transonic methods. Qa can be estimated from on-line dialysate urea measurements that are taken before and after line reversal together with knowledge of K.

Dialyzer and machine technologies: application of recent advances to clinical practice

Although hemodialysis is a mature therapy, a growing population of patients with more complex medical problems and limitations on resources will require technological innovations to improve the safety, reliability and efficiency of the therapy. The past several years have seen design changes to dialyzers that have provided incremental improvements in small solute clearance and more substantial improvements in the clearance of large solutes. New functions have been added to dialysis machines that help ensure reliable delivery of the dialysis prescription and enable full advantage to be taken of improvements in dialyzer clearance of large molecules. In addition, feedback control systems have been developed that may help reduce the untoward side effects which many patients experience during hemodialysis. Whether or not a particular innovation enters routine clinical use will depend on demonstrating that it improves clinical outcomes, its cost, and, in some cases, on a more enlightened approach by regulatory authorities.

Vascular access monitoring: methods and procedures--something to standardize?

The article discusses the issue of suitable parameters (pressures, recirculation and access flow) to assess hemodialysis vascular access quality (VAQ), available methods to measure those parameters and the setup of the entire VAQ surveillance system (VAQS) in a dialysis facility. Special attention is paid to factors which need some standardization to enable evaluation of VAQ trends in an individual as well as comparison of data from different patients and different dialysis facilities. The discussed procedures are documented with the authors' own measurement results and the results of the VAQS implemented in their unit. Both dynamic and static pressures exhibit insufficient sensitivity in detecting stenoses in native arteriovenous fistulas. Access recirculation is a late finding because with its non-zero value dialysis quality is already compromised. Timely and reliable detection of a deteriorating access condition is enabled by access flow (QVA) only. No standardization is needed in extracorporeal blood flow used in QVA evaluation by ultrasonic dilution. Multiple measurements may increase the reliability of thermodilutional measurements and are a must in optodilutional ones. Timing of the measurement during dialysis should be standardized. Measurement frequency should take into account access type, QVA value and access history. Shortened intervals are needed in the immediate post-intervention period with regard to risk of re-stenosis incidence and strongly nonlinear QVA decreases in such cases. A significant shift-over from surgical interventions to balloon angioplasties is to be expected with the introduction of a VAQS, and appropriate measures must be taken to ensure their quick availability.

Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?

BACKGROUND

On-line monitoring of chemical/physical signals during haemodialysis (HD) and bio-feedback represents the first step towards a 'physiological' HD system incorporating adaptive and logic controls in order to achieve pre-set treatment targets.

METHODS

Discussions took place to achieve a consensus on key points relating to on-line monitoring and bio-feedback, focusing on the clinical applications.

RESULTS

The relative blood volume (BV) reduction during HD can be monitored by optic devices detecting the variations in concentration of haemoglobin/haematocrit. BV changes result from an equilibrium between ultrafiltration and the refilling capacity. However, BV reduction has little power in predicting intra-HD hypotensive episodes, while the combination of the patient-dialysate sodium gradient, the relative BV reduction between the 20th and 40th minute of HD, the irregularity of the profile of BV reduction over time and the heart rate decrease from the start to the 20th minute of HD predict intra-HD hypotension with a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 73% and an accuracy of 80%. A bio-feedback system drives the relative BV reduction according to desired values by instantaneously changing the ultrafiltration rate and the dialysate conductivity. This system has proved to reduce the incidence of intra-HD hypotension episodes significantly. Ionic dialysance and the patient's plasma conductivity can be calculated easily from on-line inlet and outlet dialysate conductivity measurements at two different steps of dialysate conductivity. Ionic dialysance is equivalent to urea clearance corrected for recirculation and is a tool for continuously monitoring the dialysis efficiency and detecting early problems with the delivery of the prescribed dose of dialysis. Given the strict and linear relationship between conductivity and sodium content, the conductivity values replace the sodium concentration values and this permits the development of a conductivity kinetic model, by means of which sodium balance can be achieved at each dialysis session. The conductivity kinetic model has been demonstrated to improve intra-HD cardiovascular stability in hypotension-prone patients significantly. Ionic dialysance is also a useful tool to monitor vascular access function, as it can be used to obtain serial measurements of vascular access blood flow. On-line urea monitors provide detailed information on intra-HD urea kinetics and delivered dialysis dose, but they are not in widespread use because of the costs related to the disposable materials (e.g. urease cartridge). The body temperature monitor measures the blood temperature at the arterial and venous lines of the extra-corporeal circuit and, thanks to a bio-feedback system, is able to modulate the dialysate temperature in order to influence the patient's core body temperature, which can be kept at constant values. This is associated with improved intra-HD cardiovascular stability. The module can also be used to quantify total recirculation.

CONCLUSIONS

On-line monitoring devices and bio-feedback systems have evolved from toys for research use to tools for routine clinical application, particularly in patients with clinical complications. Conductivity monitoring appears the most versatile tool, as it permits quantification of delivered dialysis dose, achievement of sodium balance and surveillance of vascular access function, potentially at each dialysis session and without extra cost.

Locking of tunneled hemodialysis catheters with gentamicin and heparin

INTRODUCTION

Catheter-related infection (CRI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving hemodialysis. Antibiotic locking of these catheters has been shown to increase both the success of systemic antibiotic treatment in line sepsis, and to reduce the incidence of sepsis. We have studied the use of gentamicin locking of catheters (in combination with standard heparin rather than previously reported citrate) to reduce CRI rates. Furthermore, we have investigated the effects of this strategy on epoetin requirements and vascular access function.

METHODS

Fifty patients were studied. Patients were randomized to catheter-restricted filling with either standard heparin (5000 IU/mL) alone, or gentamicin and heparin (5 mg/mL). Epoetin requirements and hemoglobin response were monitored over the study period.

RESULTS

The gentamicin-locked group suffered only one infective episode (0.3/1000 catheter days) compared to 10 episodes in six patients in the heparin alone group (4/1000 catheter days, P= 0.02). The isolated organisms were equally split between Staphylococcal species and coliforms. There were no statistically significant differences in delivered dialysis dose (Kt/V) or QA between the two groups. Use of antibiotic locking was associated with both a higher mean hemoglobin (10.1 +/-0.14 g/dL vs. 9.2 +/- 0.17 g/dL in the heparin group, P= 0.003) and a lower mean epoetin dose (9000 +/- 734 IU/week vs. 10790 +/-615 IU/week in the heparin group, P= 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The practice of locking newly inserted tunneled central venous catheters with gentamicin and heparin is an effective strategy to reduce line sepsis rates, and is associated with beneficial effects on epoetin requirements.

Access flow measurement during surveillance and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty intervention

The introduction of routine access flow measurement methodology has enabled accurate identification of problematic accesses and provided a means for follow-up evaluation. These methods have uncovered, in some cases, that interventions are either immediately unsuccessful or that they fail within 3 months to maintain flow above preintervention levels. The purpose of this article is to analyze the main problems that occur at each step in the loop of flow surveillance-intervention-follow-up and to provide suggestions for improving outcomes. Analysis of published access flow data suggests that the main problems lie in the areas of inadequate analysis of flow surveillance data, lack of objective technology for quantifying intervention effectiveness, and lack of follow-up flow measurements in the hemodialysis (HD) unit after the intervention. The following three recommendations may improve surveillance outcomes: 1). using a reliable access flow technology combined with analysis of all hemodynamic data (including mean arterial pressure) before referring patients for angiography to decrease surveillance false positives; 2). performing intra-access blood flow measurement during angioplasty, which may improve outcomes by giving warning of errors before the patient leaves the intervention suite. Success achieved in restoring flow as measured during the intervention usually predicts good immediate outcomes in the HD unit; 3). measuring access flows during the next week after angioplasty. If the results are unsatisfactory, the patient should be further evaluated to avoid a potential thrombotic event.

Underestimation of access flow by ultrasound dilution flow measurements

For hemodialysis access surveillance, flow measurements are increasingly considered important because they identify accesses at risk of thrombosis. Usually these flow measurements are performed with the ultrasound dilution technique. In a previous patient study it was observed that the resulting flow values were systematically low as compared to magnetic resonance flow measurements, but a satisfactory explanation was lacking. In the present study, we will demonstrate by hemodynamic calculations and in vitro experiments that this discrepancy can be explained by a temporary reduction of the access flow rate, caused by the reversed needle configuration during ultrasound dilution flow measurements. In this configuration. blood is injected retrogressively at one needle and flow between the needles is increased, causing an increased dissipation of energy. The proposed explanation is subsequently confirmed in a patient with a loop graft, by measuring the blood velocity by Doppler ultrasound as a function of reversed dialyzer flow rate. Apart from the ultrasound dilution technique, these findings are applicable to other recently proposed methods for measuring access flow that employ the reversed needle configuration.

Ionic dialysance vs urea clearance in the absence of cardiopulmonary recirculation

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown a slight discrepancy between ionic dialysance (D) and dialyser urea clearance (UK), even in the absence of access recirculation. As it has been suggested that this discrepancy could be due to the cardiopulmonary recirculation, we studied the relationship between these two parameters in a particular dialysis setting without cardiopulmonary recirculation.

METHODS

Paired measurement of urea clearance and ionic dialysance were performed in five patients without arterio-venous access who were dialysed via an internal jugular vein twin catheter. Fifty paired measurements were used for statistical analysis. Vascular access recirculation was assessed by an ultrasound dilution technique. The measured value of ionic dialysance was corrected (D(0)) for the effect of vascular access recirculation and was compared with instant urea clearance calculated from the dialysate side.

RESULTS

The difference between the paired measurements of D(0) and UK (n=50) was equal to 0.6+/-16.9 ml/min (NS). With a statistical power of 90% and taking into account this standard deviation, this study might have shown a difference of at least 10.9 ml/min. The correlation was highly significant (P<0.0001). The discrepancy of the two parameters varied with dialysis efficiency, with a decreasing D(0):UK ratio for the higher dialysis efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with our previous results obtained in patients dialysed on arterio-venous access and performed with similar methods, the relationship between D(0) and UK is modified. This difference between D(0) and UK gets lower in patients dialysed on central catheters and this variance is in accordance with that expected when the influence of the cardiopulmonary recirculation on the measurement of ionic dialysance is taken into account. The limits of agreement (+/-2 SD) between D(0) and UK (+/-34 ml/min, Bland-Altman analysis) were higher than expected and raised questions about the accuracy of the measurement of each parameter via a central venous catheter.

Noninvasive transcutaneous determination of access blood flow rate

BACKGROUND

Current indicator dilution techniques for determining the vascular access blood flow rate (Qa) require reversal of the dialysis blood lines and are time consuming. We have recently described an indicator dilution technique for determining Qa using a novel optical transcutaneous hematocrit (Hct) sensor that does not require reversal of the dialysis lines, and have validated the accuracy of this method (TQa) in vitro.

METHODS

This study compared results using the TQa method with those obtained using a similar indicator dilution technique but which required reversal of the dialysis lines (HD01 Monitor, Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY, USA) during routine hemodialysis in 59 patients (25 native fistulas and 34 synthetic grafts). The sensor for the TQa method was placed on the skin directly over the access to measure changes in Hct approximately 25 mm downstream of the venous needle. A single 30 mL bolus of saline was infused into the dialyzer venous line over approximately six seconds without reversal of the dialysis blood lines, and the vascular access flow rate was calculated using indicator dilution methods from the time-dependent decrease in the Hct downstream of the venous needle. Two additional small-scale studies were performed to assess the effect skin pigmentation and to evaluate further the reproducibility of the TQa method.

RESULTS

Qa values determined by the TQa method were highly correlated with those determined by the HD01 method (N = 72, R2 = 0.948, P < 0.001) over the range of 153 to 2,042 mL/min. There was no significant difference between vascular access flow rates determined by the TQa method and those determined by the HD01

METHOD

Results from one small-scale study showed that the relationship between Qa values determined by the TQa and the HD01 methods was similar when tested only among black patients (N = 12), suggesting that skin pigmentation is not an important determinant of the accuracy of the TQa

METHOD

The second small-scale study showed that the intratreatment coefficient of variation for the TQa method was 7.8 +/- 5.6% (N = 14).

CONCLUSIONS

: These results show that transcutaneous measurement of Qa is an accurate, simple, and fast technique for determining Qa without requiring the reversal of the dialysis blood lines.

Hemodialysis in the pediatric patient: state of the art

The prevalence of pediatric patients receiving hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy has increased over the past decade. Although numerous technologic advances have been developed and their impact assessed for adult patients receiving hemodialysis, no long-term outcome study currently exists for children receiving hemodialysis. Barriers to such study include the necessity for long-term multicenter participation to enroll enough patients to make definitive statements regarding outcome, lack of consensus for an acceptable and practical method for hemodialysis adequacy measurement in children, and the need for pediatric end-stage renal disease (ESRD)-specific tools for assessment of quality of life. The first part of this article reviews issues surrounding hemodialysis adequacy measurement in children. In particular, simple but accurate Kt/V and normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) estimation methods are proposed that should allow for more widespread use of Kt/V and nPCR for measurement of urea clearance and nutritional status in children receiving hemodialysis, important for both patient care and to control for hemodialysis adequacy in pediatric outcome studies. In addition, the principles and pediatric study of 2 technologic advances, continuous noninvasive monitoring of hematocrit and noninvasive ultrasound dilution vascular access flow measurement, are reviewed. Finally, suggestions are provided for future study pertinent to both short-term and long-term outcomes in children receiving hemodialysis.

Festschrift for Professor Claude Jacobs. Recent developments in conductivity monitoring of haemodialysis session

On-line monitoring of dialysate conductivity is now a standard equipment (called 'Diascan') of the dialysis monitor Integra (Hospal, Italy). From the record of the dialysate conductivity at the dialyser inlet and outlet, the Diascan calculates the values of patient's plasma conductivity and of ionic dialysance which is a weighed average of the dialysances of all ions of quantitative importance in plasma and dialysate. Because there is an equivalence between the transfer characteristics of urea and electrolytes, the ionic dialysance reflects the urea clearance corrected for recirculation. Because the conductivity of a solution is related to the concentrations of the ions and thus to the effective osmolality, the plasma conductivity is a reflection of the plasma sodium concentration. The determination of ionic dialysance and plasma conductivity by the Diascan module is fully automatic and totally inexpensive, does not require any blood or dialysate sampling and therefore can be repeated every 15 or 30 min during each dialysis session. Some clinical applications of conductivity modelling are presented: (i) the repeated measurement of ionic dialysance allows the quantification of the dialysis dose actually delivered to the patient from the beginning of the session; (ii) the measurement of ionic dialysance with blood lines in normal and reversed positions permits the easy estimation of the blood flow rate in the vascular access of the haemodialysed patient; (iii) the on-line monitoring of ionic dialysance allows the development of new methods of haemodialysis with simultaneous infusion of ions; (iv) the on-line monitoring of ionic dialysance and patient's plasma conductivity facilitates the automatic optimization of the dialysate conductivity for each individual patient.