In vivo effects of diadenosine polyphosphates on rat renal microcirculation

Extracellular Nucleotides and P2 Receptors in Renal Function

The understanding of the nucleotide/P2 receptor system in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and transport function has grown exponentially over the last 20 yr. This review attempts to integrate the available data while also identifying areas of missing information. First, the determinants of nucleotide concentrations in the interstitial and tubular fluids of the kidney are described, including mechanisms of cellular release of nucleotides and their extracellular breakdown. Then the renal cell membrane expression of P2X and P2Y receptors is discussed in the context of their effects on renal vascular and tubular functions. Attention is paid to effects on the cortical vasculature and intraglomerular structures, autoregulation of renal blood flow, tubuloglomerular feedback, and the control of medullary blood flow. The role of the nucleotide/P2 receptor system in the autocrine/paracrine regulation of sodium and fluid transport in the tubular and collecting duct system is outlined together with its role in integrative sodium and fluid homeostasis and blood pressure control. The final section summarizes the rapidly growing evidence indicating a prominent role of the extracellular nucleotide/P2 receptor system in the pathophysiology of the kidney and aims to identify potential therapeutic opportunities, including hypertension, lithium-induced nephropathy, polycystic kidney disease, and kidney inflammation. We are only beginning to unravel the distinct physiological and pathophysiological influences of the extracellular nucleotide/P2 receptor system and the associated therapeutic perspectives.

Adenosine A2A receptor blocks the A 1 receptor inhibition of renal Na + transport and oxygen consumption

A high renal oxygen (O₂ ) need is primarily associated with the renal tubular O₂ consumption (VO₂ ) necessary for a high rate of sodium (Na⁺ ) transport. Limited O₂ availability leads to increased levels of adenosine, which regulates the kidney via activation of both A₁ and A_2A adenosine receptors (A1R and A2AR, respectively). The relative contributions of A1R and A2AR to the regulation of renal Na⁺ transport and VO₂ have not been determined. We demonstrated that A1R activation has a dose-dependent biphasic effect on both renal Na⁺ /H⁺ exchanger-3 (NHE3), a major player in Na⁺ transport, and VO₂ . Here, we report concentration-dependent effects of adenosine: less than 5 × 10^-7  M adenosine-stimulated NHE3 activity; between 5 × 10^-7  M and 10^-5  M adenosine-inhibited NHE3 activity; and greater than 10^-5  M adenosine reversed the change in NHE3 activity (returned to baseline). A1R activation mediated the activation and inhibition of NHE3 activity, whereas 10^-4  M adenosine had no effect on the NHE3 activity due to A2AR activation. The following occurred when A1R and A2AR were activated: (a) Blockade of the A2AR receptor restored the NHE3 inhibition mediated by A1R activation, (b) the NHE-dependent effect on VO₂ mediated by A1R activation became NHE independent, and (c) A2AR bound to A1R. In summary, A1R affects VO₂ via NHE-dependent mechanisms, whereas A2AR acts via NHE-independent mechanisms. When both A1R and A2AR are activated, the A2AR effect on NHE3 and VO₂ predominates, possibly via an A1R-A2AR protein interaction. A2AR-A1R heterodimerization is proposed as the molecular mechanism enabling the NHE-independent control of renal VO₂ .

Diadenosine pentaphosphate modulates glomerular arteriolar tone and glomerular filtration rate

INTRODUCTION

Mechanisms and participating substances involved in the reduction of glomerular filtration (GFR) in contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) are still matter of debate. We hypothesized that diadenosine polyphosphates are released by the action of contrast media on tubular cells and may act on glomerular arterioles and reduce GFR.

METHODS

Freshly isolated rat tubules were treated with the contrast medium iodixanol (47 mg iodine per mL) at 37 °C for 20 min. The content of Apn A (n = 3-6) in the supernatant of treated tubules and in the plasma of healthy persons and patients with AKI was analysed using reversed-phase chromatography, affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. GFR was obtained in conscious mice by inulin clearance. Concentration response curves for Apn A (n = 3-6, 10(-12) -10(-5)  mol L(-1) ) were measured in isolated perfused glomerular arterioles.

RESULTS

Iodixanol treatment of tubules significantly increased the concentration of Apn A (n = 3-5) in the supernatant. Ap6 A was below the detection limit. AKI patient shows higher concentrations of Apn A compared to healthy. Application of Ap5 A significantly reduced the GFR in conscious mice. Ap5 A reduced afferent arteriolar diameters, but did not influence efferent arterioles. The constrictor effect on afferent arterioles was strong immediately after application, but weakened with time. Then, non-selective P2 inhibitor suramin blocked the Ap5 A-induced constriction.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that Ap5 A plays a role in the pathophysiology of CI-AKI. We show a contrast media-induced release of Ap5 A from tubules, which might increase afferent arteriolar resistance and reduce the GFR.

Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease

Purinergic signaling plays important roles in control of vascular tone and remodeling. There is dual control of vascular tone by ATP released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from perivascular sympathetic nerves to cause vasoconstriction via P2X1 receptors, whereas ATP released from endothelial cells in response to changes in blood flow (producing shear stress) or hypoxia acts on P2X and P2Y receptors on endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, which dilates vessels. ATP is also released from sensory-motor nerves during antidromic reflex activity to produce relaxation of some blood vessels. In this review, we stress the differences in neural and endothelial factors in purinergic control of different blood vessels. The long-term (trophic) actions of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleotides in promoting migration and proliferation of both vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells via P1 and P2Y receptors during angiogenesis and vessel remodeling during restenosis after angioplasty are described. The pathophysiology of blood vessels and therapeutic potential of purinergic agents in diseases, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, ischemia, thrombosis and stroke, diabetes, and migraine, is discussed.

Differential effects of uridine adenosine tetraphosphate on purinoceptors in the rat isolated perfused kidney

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Purinergic signalling plays an important role in vascular tone regulation in humans. We have identified uridine adenosine tetraphosphate (Up(4)A) as a novel and highly potent endothelial-derived contracting factor. Up(4)A induces strong vasoconstrictive effects in the renal vascular system mainly by P2X(1) receptor activation. However, other purinoceptors are also involved and were analysed here.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The rat isolated perfused kidney was used to characterize vasoactive actions of Up(4)A.

KEY RESULTS

After desensitization of the P2X(1) receptor by α,β-methylene ATP (α,β-meATP), Up(4)A showed dose-dependent P2Y(2)-mediated vasoconstriction. Continuous perfusion with Up(4)A evoked a biphasic vasoconstrictor effect: there was a strong and rapidly desensitizing vasoconstriction, inhibited by P2X(1) receptor desensitization. In addition, there is a long-lasting P2Y(2)-mediated vasoconstriction. This vasoconstriction could be blocked by suramin, but not by PPADS or reactive blue 2. In preparations of the rat isolated perfused kidney model with an elevated vascular tone, bolus application of Up(4)A showed a dose-dependent vasoconstriction that was followed by a dose-dependent vasodilation. The vasoconstriction was in part sensitive to P2X(1) receptor desensitization by α,β-meATP, and the remaining P2Y(2)-mediated vasoconstriction was only inhibited by suramin. The Up(4)A-induced vasodilation depended on activation of nitric oxide synthases, and was mediated by P2Y(1) and P2Y(2) receptor activation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Up(4)A activated P2X(1) and P2Y(2) receptors to act as a vasoconstrictor, whereas endothelium-dependent vasodilation was induced by P2Y(1/2) receptor activation. Up(4)A might be of relevance in the physiology and pathophysiology of vascular tone regulation.

Dinucleoside polyphosphates and uremia

Dinucleoside polyphosphates constitute a group of endogenous vasoregulatory purines and pyrimidines with a strong impact on physiologic and pathophysiologic processes of the cardiovascular system. Recently, the importance of dinucleoside polyphosphates in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and uremia gained increasing interest. Although our knowledge about the impact of dinucleoside polyphosphates in CKD and uremia is just at the beginning, this article reviews the current knowledge of the physiologic and pathophysiologic role of dinucleoside polyphosphates in CKD and uremia.

Dinucleoside polyphosphates: strong endogenous agonists of the purinergic system

The purinergic system is composed of mononucleosides, mononucleoside polyphosphates and dinucleoside polyphosphates as agonists, as well as the respective purinergic receptors. Interest in the role of the purinergic system in cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology is on the rise. This review focuses on the overall impact of dinucleoside polyphosphates in the purinergic system. Platelets, adrenal glands, endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes and tubular cells release dinucleoside polyphosphates. Plasma concentrations of dinucleoside polyphosphates are sufficient to cause direct vasoregulatory effects and to induce proliferative effects on vascular smooth muscle cells and mesangial cells. In addition, increased plasma concentrations of a dinucleoside polyphosphate were recently demonstrated in juvenile hypertensive patients. In conclusion, the current literature accentuates the strong physiological and pathophysiological impact of dinucleoside polyphosphates on the cardiovascular system.

Activation of A(2) adenosine receptors dilates cortical efferent arterioles in mouse

Adenosine can induce vasodilatation and vasoconstriction of the renal afferent arteriole of the mouse. We determined here its direct effect on efferent arterioles of mouse kidneys. Using isolated-perfused cortical efferent arterioles, we measured changes in luminal diameter in response to adenosine. Extraluminal application of adenosine and cyclohexyladenosine had no effect on the luminal diameter. When the vessels were constricted by the thromboxane mimetic U46619, application of adenosine and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine dilated the efferent arterioles in a dose-dependent manner. We also found that the adenosine-induced vasodilatation was inhibited by the A(2)-specific receptor blocker 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine. In the presence of this inhibitor, adenosine failed to alter the basal vessel diameter of quiescent efferent arterioles. Using primer-specific polymerase chain reaction we found that the adenosine A(1), A(2a), A(2b), and A(3) receptors were expressed in microdissected mouse efferent arterioles. We conclude that adenosine dilates the efferent arteriole using the A(2) receptor subtype at concentrations compatible with activation of the A(2b) receptor.

Adenosine receptors and the kidney

The autacoid, adenosine, is present in the normoxic kidney and generated in the cytosol as well as at extracellular sites. The rate of adenosine formation is enhanced when the rate of ATP hydrolysis prevails over the rate of ATP synthesis during increased tubular transport work or during oxygen deficiency. Extracellular adenosine acts on adenosine receptor subtypes (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)) in the cell membranes to affect vascular and tubular functions. Adenosine lowers glomerular filtration rate by constricting afferent arterioles, especially in superficial nephrons, and thus lowers the salt load and transport work of the kidney consistent with the concept of metabolic control of organ function. In contrast, it leads to vasodilation in the deep cortex and the semihypoxic medulla, and exerts differential effects on NaCl transport along the tubular and collecting duct system. These vascular and tubular effects point to a prominent role of adenosine and its receptors in the intrarenal metabolic regulation of kidney function, and, together with its role in inflammatory processes, form the basis for potential therapeutic approaches in radiocontrast media-induced acute renal failure, ischemia reperfusion injury, and in patients with cardiorenal failure.

Visualisation of the effects of dilazep on rat afferent and efferent arterioles in vivo

Although the effects of dilazep hydrochloride (dilazep), a nucleoside transport inhibitor, have been examined, there have been no visualisation studies on the physiological effects of dilazep on the glomerular arterioles. The purpose of this study was to visualise and evaluate the effects of dilazep and consequently the effects of adenosine, which dilazep augments by measuring glomelurar diameters, renal blood flow and resistance in rats in vivo. We time-sequentially examined afferent and efferent arteriolar diameter changes using an intravital videomicroscope and renal blood flow. We administered dilazep at a dose of 300 microg/kg intravenously. To further investigate the effects of dilazep, rats were pre-treated with 8-p-sulfophenyl theophylline (a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (an A1 receptor antagonist), or 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (an A2 receptor antagonist). Dilazep constricted the afferent and efferent arterioles at the early phase and dilated them at the later phase, with the same degree of vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory effect on both arterioles. A1 blockade abolished vasoconstriction and augmented vasodilatation at the later phase and A2 blockade abolished vasodilatation and augmented vasoconstriction at the early phase. Non-selective blockade abolished both early vasoconstriction and later vasodilatation. In conclusion, adenosine augmented by dilazep constricted the afferent and efferent arterioles of the cortical nephrons at the early phase and dilated both arterioles at the later phase via A1 and A2 adenosine receptor activation, respectively. That the ratio of afferent to efferent arteriolar diameter was fairly constant suggests that intraglomerular pressure is maintained in the acute phase by adenosine despite the biphasic flow change.

Adenosine and kidney function: potential implications in patients with heart failure

Therapy of heart failure is more difficult when renal function is impaired. Here, we outline the effects on kidney function of the autacoid, adenosine, which forms the basis for adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)R) antagonists as treatment for decompensated heart failure. A(1)R antagonists induce a eukaliuretic natriuresis and diuresis by blocking A(1)R-mediated NaCl reabsorption in the proximal tubule and the collecting duct. Normally, suppressing proximal reabsorption will lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) through the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism (TGF). But the TGF response, itself, is mediated by A(1)R in the preglomerular arteriole, so blocking A(1)R allows natriuresis to proceed while GFR remains constant or increases. The influence of A(1)R over vascular resistance in the kidney is augmented by angiotensin II while A(1)R activation directly suppresses renin secretion. These interactions could modulate the overall impact of A(1)R blockade on kidney function in patients taking angiotensin II blockers. A(1)R blockers may increase the energy utilized for transport in the semi-hypoxic medullary thick ascending limb, an effect that could be prevented with loop diuretics. Finally, while the vasodilatory effect of A(1)R blockade could protect against renal ischaemia, A(1)R blockade may act on non-resident cells to exacerbate reperfusion injury, where ischaemia to occur. Despite these uncertainties, the available data on A(1)R antagonist therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure are promising and warrant confirmation in further studies.

Adenosine and Kidney Function

In this review we outline the unique effects of the autacoid adenosine in the kidney. Adenosine is present in the cytosol of renal cells and in the extracellular space of normoxic kidneys. Extracellular adenosine can derive from cellular adenosine release or extracellular breakdown of ATP, AMP, or cAMP. It is generated at enhanced rates when tubular NaCl reabsorption and thus transport work increase or when hypoxia is induced. Extracellular adenosine acts on adenosine receptor subtypes in the cell membranes to affect vascular and tubular functions. Adenosine lowers glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by constricting afferent arterioles, especially in superficial nephrons, and acts as a mediator of the tubuloglomerular feedback, i.e., a mechanism that coordinates GFR and tubular transport. In contrast, it leads to vasodilation in deep cortex and medulla. Moreover, adenosine tonically inhibits the renal release of renin and stimulates NaCl transport in the cortical proximal tubule but inhibits it in medullary segments including the medullary thick ascending limb. These differential effects of adenosine are subsequently analyzed in a more integrative way in the context of intrarenal metabolic regulation of kidney function, and potential pathophysiological consequences are outlined.

Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects of adenosine in the mouse kidney due to preferential activation of A1 or A2 adenosine receptors

The present experiments in mice were performed to determine the steady-state effects of exogenous adenosine on the vascular resistance of the whole kidney, of superficial blood vessels, and of afferent arterioles. The steady-state effect of an intravenous infusion of adenosine (5, 10, and 20 microg/min) in wild-type mice was vasodilatation as evidenced by significant reductions of renal and superficial vascular resistance. Resistance decreases were augmented in adenosine 1 receptor (A1AR) -/- mice. Renal vasodilatation by the A2aAR agonist CGS 21680A [2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethyl-amino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine hydrochloride] (0.25, 0.5, and 1 microg/kg/min) and inhibition of adenosine-induced relaxation by the A2aAR antagonist ZM-241385 [4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol] (20 mg/kg) suggests that the reduction of renovascular resistance was largely mediated by A2aAR. After treatment with Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) adenosine was unable to alter superficial blood flow and resistance significantly indicating that adenosine-induced dilatation is NO-dependent. Absence of a dilatory effect in endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (NOS) -/- mice suggests endothelial NOS as the source of NO. When infused into the subcapsular interstitium, adenosine reduced superficial blood flow through A1AR activation. Adenosine (10(-7) M) constricted isolated perfused afferent arterioles when added to the bath but not when added to the luminal perfusate. Luminal adenosine caused vasoconstriction in the presence of L-NAME or the A2AR antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-(2-propynyl)xanthine. Our data show that global elevation of renal adenosine causes steady-state vasorelaxation resulting from adenosine 2 receptor (A2AR)-mediated generation of NO. In contrast, selective augmentation of adenosine around afferent arterioles causes persistent vasoconstriction, indicating A1AR dominance. Thus, adenosine is a renal constrictor only when it can interact with afferent arteriolar A1AR without affecting the bulk of renal A2AR at the same time.

Isolation and quantification of dinucleoside polyphosphates by using monolithic reversed phase chromatography columns

In former studies, dinucleoside polyphosphates were quantified using ion-pair reversed-phase perfusion chromatography columns, which allows a detection limit in the micromolar range. The aim of this study was both to describe a chromatographic assay with an increased efficiency of the dinucleoside separation, which enables the reduction of analytical run times, and to establish a chromatographic assay using conditions, which allow MALDI-mass spectrometric analysis of the resulting fractions. We compared the performance of conventional silica reversed phase chromatography columns, a perfusion chromatography column and a monolithic reversed-phase C18 chromatography column. The effects of different ion-pair reagents, flow-rates and gradients on the separation of synthetic diadenosine polyphosphates as well as of diadenosine polyphosphates isolated from human platelets were analysed. Sensitivity and resolution of the monolithic reversed-phase chromatography column were both higher than that of the perfusion chromatography and the conventional reversed phase chromatography columns. Using a monolithic reversed-phase C18 chromatography column, diadenosine polyphosphates were separable baseline not only in the presence of tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate (TBA) but also in the presence of triethylammonium acetate (TEAA) as ion-pair reagent. The later reagent is useful because, in contrast to TBA, it is compatible with MALDI mass-spectrometric methods. This makes TEAA particularly suitable for identification of unknown nucleoside polyphosphates. Furthermore, because of the lower backpressure of monolithic reversed-phase chromatography columns, we were able to significantly increase the flow rate, decreasing the amount of time for the analysis close to 50%, especially using TBA as ion-pair reagent. In summary, monolithic reversed phase C18 columns markedly increase the sensitivity and resolution of dinucleoside polyphosphate analysis in a time-efficient manner compared to reversed-phase perfusion chromatography columns or conventional reversed-phase columns. Therefore, further dinucleoside polyphosphate analytic assays should be based on monolithic silica C18 columns instead of perfusion chromatography or conventional silica reversed phase chromatography columns. In conclusion, the use of monolithic silica C18 columns will lead to isolation and quantification of up to now unknown dinucleoside polyphosphates. These chromatography columns may facilitate further research on the biological roles of dinucleoside polyphosphates.

Effects of diadenosine polyphosphates on glomerular volume

1. Diadenosine polyphosphates (P(1),P(3)-diadenosine triphosphate, Ap(3)A; P(1),P(4)-diadenosine tetraphosphate, Ap(4)A; and P(1),P(5)-diadenosine pentaphosphate, Ap(5)A) are vasoactive molecules. The experimental model of isolated rat renal glomeruli was used to investigate their effects on glomerular vasculature. We measured the changes of glomerular inulin space (GIS) as a marker of glomeruli contractility. 2. Ap(4)A and Ap(5)A induced concentration- and time-dependent reduction of GIS whereas Ap(3)A had no effect. The effects of Ap(4)A and Ap(5)A (both at 1 microM) were prevented by a nonselective P2 receptor antagonist, that is, suramin (10 microM) and P2Y receptor antagonist - reactive blue 2 (50 microM). However, the antagonist of P1 receptor, that is, theophylline (1 microM) and A(1) receptor 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 10 microM) did not affect the responses of glomeruli to Ap(4)A or Ap(5)A. 3. Ap(3)A, in contrast to Ap(4)A and Ap(5)A, prevented angiotensin II-induced reduction of GIS in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. This effect was partially prevented by suramin and markedly reduced by reactive blue 2 and the specific antagonist of P2Y(1) receptor - MRS 2179 (10 microM). However, theophylline and the specific antagonist of A(2) receptor - 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX; 10 microM) - did not affect Ap(3)A action. 4. We indicate that diadenosine polyphosphates changed the glomerular volume via activation of P2 receptors. We suggest that extracellular Ap(4)A and Ap(5)A via P2X and P2Y receptors may decrease and Ap(3)A via, at least in part, P2Y(1) receptors may increase filtration surface, which in turn may modify glomerular filtration rate.

Role of interstitial ATP and adenosine in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and microvascular function

The role of adenosine in the regulation of renal hemodynamics and function has been studied extensively; however, another purine agent, ATP, is also gaining recognition for its paracrine role in the kidney. Adenosine and ATP bind to specific membrane-bound P1 and P2 purinoceptors, respectively, and initiate a variety of biological effects on renal microvascular tone, mesangial cell function, and renal epithelial transport. The purpose of this review is to summarize the potential roles of interstitial ATP and adenosine as regulators of renal hemodynamics and microcirculation. In vitro blood-perfused juxtamedullary nephron preparation was used to assess the roles of ATP and adenosine in the regulation of renal microvascular tone. This approach mimics the adventitial exposure of renal microvascular smooth muscle to ATP and adenosine synthesized locally and released into the interstitial fluid. ATP selectively vasoconstricts afferent but not efferent arterioles via P2X and P2Y receptors, whereas, adenosine vasoconstricts both vascular segments via activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. Furthermore, selective P2X and P2Y receptor stimulation increases intracellular calcium concentration in vascular smooth muscle cells that are freshly isolated from the preglomerular microvasculature. These data support the hypothesis that interstitial ATP plays a critical role in the control of renal microvascular function through mechanisms that are independent of adenosine receptors. We have recently developed a renal microdialysis method to determine the dynamics of ATP and adenosine levels in the renal cortical interstitium. In this review, we also summarize current knowledge pertaining to the alterations in renal interstitial ATP and adenosine in some pathophysiological conditions.

Vasoactivity of diadenosine polyphosphates in human small renal resistance arteries

BACKGROUND

We examined for the first time the vascular effects of purinergic agents that contribute to the regulation of peripheral vascular resistance in human small renal resistance arteries (hRRAs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Diadenosine polyphosphates (ApnAs, n = 3-6) and ATP, mounted in a microvessel myograph, caused vasoconstriction in hRRAs (rank order of potency: Ap5A > Ap6A = Ap4A > Ap3A = ATP). ADP, AMP and adenosine had less contractile potency than ApnA, suggesting that the observed effects were not induced by ApnA degradation products. The ApnA agent, Ap5A, but not Ap4A, induced vasoconstrictions that were inhibited by pyridoxal phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid (PPADS; a P2X purinoceptor antagonist), but not by ADP3'5' (a P2Y purinoceptor antagonist). In pre-contracted hRRAs, all of the ApnA agents caused vasorelaxation, and the potencies did not differ from each other. The ApnA degradation products had less vasorelaxing potencies than ApnA, suggesting that the vasorelaxation was caused by the ApnA agents themselves. Ap4A-induced vasorelaxation was inhibited by ADP3'5' and PPADS. In contrast, Ap5A-induced vasorelaxation was not antagonized by ADP3'5', but was antagonized more strongly by PPADS than was Ap4A.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the tone of resistance arteries in human kidneys can be considerably influenced by these purinergic agonists, and most potently by ApnAs. Ap5A-induced vasoconstriction appeared to be mediated by P2X purinoceptors, whereas constriction due to Ap4A was caused by a different purinoceptor. Vasorelaxation due to Ap4A, but not Ap5A, appeared to be mediated by P2Y purinoceptors.

Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects of adenosine in the kidney

Adenosine is an ATP breakdown product that in most vessels causes vasodilatation and that contributes to the metabolic control of organ perfusion, i.e., to the match between oxygen demand and oxygen delivery. In the renal vasculature, in contrast, adenosine can produce vasoconstriction, a response that has been suggested to be an organ-specific version of metabolic control designed to restrict organ perfusion when transport work increases. However, the vasoconstriction elicited by an intravenous infusion of adenosine is only short lasting, being replaced within 1-2 min by vasodilatation. It appears that the steady-state response to the increase of plasma adenosine levels above normal resulting from the infusion is global renal vasorelaxation that is the result of A2AR activation in most parts of the renal vasculature, including larger renal arteries, juxtamedullary afferent arterioles, efferent arterioles, and medullary vessels. A2AR-mediated vasorelaxation is probably facilitated by endothelial receptors that cause the release of nitric oxide and other endothelial relaxing factors. In contrast, isolated perfused afferent arterioles of superficial and midcortical nephrons of rabbit and mouse, especially in their most distal segment at the entrance to the glomerulus, respond to adenosine with persistent vasoconstriction, indicating predominant or exclusive expression of A1AR. A1AR in afferent arterioles are selectively activated from the interstitial aspect of the vessel. This property can dissociate A1AR activation from changes in vascular adenosine concentration, a characteristic that is ideally suited for the role of renal adenosine as a paracrine factor in the control of glomerular function.

Adenosine Induces Vasoconstriction through Gi-Dependent Activation of Phospholipase C in Isolated Perfused Afferent Arterioles of Mice

ABSTRACT. Adenosine induces vasoconstriction of renal afferent arterioles through activation of A1 adenosine receptors (A1AR). A1AR are directly coupled to Gi/Go, resulting in inhibition of adenylate cyclase, but the contribution of this signaling pathway to smooth muscle cell activation is unclear. In perfused afferent arterioles from mouse kidney, adenosine and the A1 agonistN6-cyclohexyladenosine, when added to the bath, caused constriction in the concentration range of 10−9to 10−6M (mean diameter: control, 8.8 ± 0.3 μm; adenosine at 10−6M, 2.8 ± 0.5 μm). Adenosine-induced vasoconstriction was stable for up to 30 min and was most pronounced in the most distal part of the afferent arterioles. Adenosine did not cause vasoconstriction in arterioles from A1AR−/− mice. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin (PTX) (400 ng/ml) for 2 h blocked the vasoconstricting action of adenosine orN6-cyclohexyladenosine. PTX pretreatment did not affect the constriction response to KCl, whereas the angiotensin II dose-response relationship was shifted rightward. Reverse transcription-PCR revealed expression of Gi but not Go in kidney cortex and preglomerular vessels. The phospholipase C inhibitor U73122 (4 μM) blocked the constriction responses to both adenosine and angiotensin II. In contrast, the adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ22536 (10 μM) and the protein kinase A antagonist KT5720 (0.1 and 1 μM) did not induce significant vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles. It is concluded that the constriction response to adenosine in afferent arterioles is mediated by A1AR coupled to a PTX-sensitive Gi protein and subsequent activation of phospholipase C, presumably through βγ subunits released from Gαi. E-mail: jurgens@intra.niddk.nih.gov

Rho-kinase inhibition blunts renal vasoconstriction induced by distinct signaling pathways in vivo

In addition to intracellular calcium, which activates myosin light chain (MLC) kinase, MLC phosphorylation and hence contraction is importantly regulated by MLC phosphatase (MLCP). Recent evidence suggests that distinct signaling cascades of vasoactive hormones interact with the Rho/Rho kinase (ROK) pathway, affecting the activity of MLCP. The present study measured the impact of ROK inhibition on vascular F-actin distribution and on vasoconstriction induced by activation/inhibition of distinct signaling pathways in vivo in the microcirculation of the split hydronephrotic rat kidney. Local application of the ROK inhibitors Y-27632 or HA-1077 induced marked dilation of pre- and postglomerular vessels. Activation of phospholipase C with the endothelin ET B agonist IRL 1620, inhibition of soluble guanylyl cyclase with 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo-[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), or inhibition of adenylyl cyclase with the adenosine A1 agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) reduced glomerular blood flow (GBF) by about 50% through vasoconstriction at different vascular levels. ROK inhibition with Y-27632 or HA-1077, but not protein kinase C inhibition with Ro 31-8220, blunted ET B-induced vasoconstriction. Furthermore, the reduction of GBF and of vascular diameters in response to ODQ or CPA were abolished by pretreatment with Y-27632. ROK inhibitors prevented constriction of preglomerular vessels and of efferent arterioles with equal effectiveness. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that Y-27632 did not change F-actin content and distribution in renal vessels. The results suggest that ROK inhibition might be considered as a potent treatment of renal vasoconstriction, because it interferes with constriction induced by distinct signaling pathways in renal vessels without affecting F-actin structure.

Vasoactivity of diadenosine polyphosphates in human small mesenteric resistance arteries

Diadenosine polyphosphates (ApnA) (n = 3-6) induced vasoconstrictions in isolated human mesenteric resistance arteries (hMRAs) mounted in a microvessel myograph (rank order of potency: Ap5A > Ap6A > Ap4A > Ap3A). The contractile effects of ApnA in hMRA were similar to their effects in rat MRA investigated previously. ATP, ADP, AMP, and adenosine had less contractile potency than ApnA, suggesting that the observed effects were not induced by the degradation products of ApnA. Ap4A- and Ap5A-induced vasoconstriction was inhibited by pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid (PPADS) (P2X purinoceptor antagonist) but not by ADP3'5' (P2Y purinoceptor antagonist). Thus, this purinergic vasoconstriction of hMRA seems to be P2X but not P2Y purinoceptor-mediated. In precontracted hMRA all ApnA caused vasorelaxations but (in contrast to rat MRA) the potencies of the ApnA did not differ significantly from each other. The ApnA degradation products had less vasorelaxing potency than ApnA, demonstrating that the vasorelaxations can be ascribed to the ApnA themselves. Ap5A-induced vasorelaxation of hMRA could neither be inhibited with ADP3'5' nor with PPADS, which reveals a decisive difference to the rat MRA where the inhibitory profile demonstrated the importance of the P2Y purinoceptor for Ap5A-induced vasorelaxation. However, Ap4A-induced vasorelaxation in hMRA could be inhibited by ADP3'5'. These findings show that Ap4A-induced vasorelaxation in hMRA is due to P2Y purinoceptor activation, that Ap5A evokes vasorelaxation in hMRA via another mechanism than Ap4A, and that data derived from the animal model cannot be simply transferred to human conditions.

P2 receptors in regulation of renal microvascular function

In the last 10-15 years, interest in the physiological role of P2 receptors has grown rapidly. Cellular, tissue, and organ responses to P2 receptor activation have been described in numerous in vivo and in vitro models. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the recent advances made in determining the involvement of P2 receptors in the control of renal hemodynamics and the renal microcirculation. Special attention will be paid to work published in the last 5-6 years directed at understanding the role of P2 receptors in the physiological control of renal microvascular function. Several investigators have begun to evaluate the effects of P2 receptor activation on renal microvascular function across several species. In vivo and in vitro evidence consistently supports the hypothesis that P2 receptor activation by locally released extracellular nucleotides influences microvascular function. Extracellular nucleotides selectively influence preglomerular resistance without having an effect on postglomerular tone. P2 receptor inactivation blocks autoregulatory behavior whereas responsiveness to other vasoconstrictor agonists is retained. P2 receptor stimulation activates multiple intracellular signal transduction pathways in preglomerular smooth muscle cells and mesangial cells. Renal microvascular cells and mesangial cells express multiple subtypes of P2 receptors; however, the specific role each plays in regulating vascular and mesangial cell function remains unclear. Accordingly, the results of studies performed to date provide strong support for the hypothesis that P2 receptors are important contributors to the physiological regulation of renal microvascular and/or glomerular function.

Renal microvascular effects of P2 receptor stimulation

1. The field of extracellular nucleotides and purinoceptors has undergone a resurgence of interest and enthusiasm in the past decade. More and more investigators are probing the physiological and pathophysiological roles of P2 receptors in virtually every organ system, including the kidney. 2. With this renewed interest has come a new appreciation for the roles extracellular adenine nucleotides can play in regulating or modulating renal function. In the past 5 years, investigators have provided compelling evidence that extracellular nucleotides, working through activation of P2 purinoceptors, have a significant impact on renal microvascular function, mesangial cell function and on renal epithelial transport. 3. Evidence has been uncovered that implicates P2 receptor activation in mediating renal microvascular autoregulatory behaviour. Locally released ATP has a direct paracrine and/or autocrine effect modulating renal epithelial transporters and tubular epithelial channels to influence tubular fluid composition. 4. While the specific roles of extracellular nucleotides and their receptors in the kidney have not been absolutely identified, it now appears clear that endogenously released ATP may play a significant role in regulating kidney function. 5. The purpose of the present review is to update our current understanding of the effect of P2 receptor activation on renal microvascular function and to detail the signal transduction mechanisms known to be involved.