Expanding the kidney donor pool: ethical and medical considerations

Greater Impact of Living Donation Than HLA Mismatching in Short-Term Renal Allograft Survival

INTRODUCTION

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is accepted as first-line treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease with advantages over deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Still, how the known detrimental effect of HLA mismatch (MM) may hamper these advantages remains unsettled. We sought to determine the effect of the degree of HLA MM, separately in deceased and living donor renal allograft outcomes.

METHODS

We evaluated all adults submitted to LDKT and DDKT at our center between 2006 and 2018. Their HLA MM was classified according to the British Society of Transplantation system in low mismatch (LM) (level 1-2) and high mismatch (HM) (level 3-4). Acute rejection (AR) and global or censored graft survival were the outcomes of interest. Recipients were followed up from transplant until death, graft failure or the end of 2020.  Results: One thousand sixty-eight kidney transplant recipients were analyzed, 815 (76%) received a DDKT whereas 253 (24%) received an LDKT. From those submitted to DDKT, 95 (12%) had an LM and 720 (88%) had an HM, whereas in LDKT 32 (13%) had an LM and 221 (87%) had an HM. The AR at one year was 9% in the full cohort. Significant risk factors for AR were HM DDKT (OR:2.3, P=0.047) or HM LDKT (OR:5.6, P=0.003) (LM DDKT as reference), calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥5% (OR:1.9, P=0.040) and delayed graft function (DGF), (OR:3.2, P<0.001). Censored graft survival (CGS) at five years was 96% in the full cohort. Independent predictors for censored graft failure (CGF) were HM LDKT (HR:0.2, P=0.046) (LM DDKT as reference), AR (HR:2.7, P=0.008) and DGF (HR:2.2, P=0.017). Global graft survival (GGS) at five years was 91% in the full cohort. Independent predictors for global graft failure (GGF) were HM LDKT (HR:0.2, P=0.042) (LM DDKT as reference), recipient age (HR:1.8, P<0.001) and DGF (HR:1.8, P=0.006). No AR, CGF or GGF episodes were observed in the LM LDKT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, the level of HLA MM increased the risk of AR independently of donor type. Considering short graft survival, our results support the advantage of living donor vs deceased donor even with an increased HLA MM. However, its effect on long-term graft survival remains to be settled, emphasizing the need for further studies on this matter.

Pregnancy after living kidney donation, a systematic review of the available evidence, and a review of the current guidance

Understanding and communicating the risk of pregnancy complications post-living kidney donation is imperative as the majority of living kidney donors (LKD) are women of childbearing age. We aimed to identify all original research articles examining complications in post-donation pregnancies and compared the quality and consistency of related guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, society webpages, and guideline registries for English-language publications published up until December 18, 2020. Ninety-three articles were screened from which 16 studies were identified, with a total of 1399 post-donation pregnancies. The outcome of interest, post-donation pregnancy complications, was not calculable, and only a narrative synthesis of the evidence was possible. The absolute risk of pre-eclampsia increased from ~1%-3% pre-donation (lower than the general population) to ~4%-10% post-donation (comparable to the general population). The risks of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes were no different between post-donation and pre-donation pregnancies. Guidelines and consensus statements were consistent in stating the need to inform LKDs of their post-donation pregnancy risk, however, the depth and scope of this guidance were variable. While the absolute risk of pregnancy complications remains low post-donation, a concerted effort is required to better identify and individualize risk in these women, such that consent to donation is truly informed.

Outcomes of Kidney Donors With Impaired Fasting Glucose

BACKGROUND

Many kidney donor candidates with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and all candidates with diabetes are currently excluded from kidney donation, fearing the development of an accelerated course of diabetic kidney disease in the remaining kidney.

METHODS

We studied mortality, proteinuria, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 8280 donors who donated between 1963 and 2007 according to donation fasting plasma glucose (FPG): <100 mg/dL (n = 6204), 100-125 mg/dL (n = 1826), and ≥126 mg/dL (n = 250).

RESULTS

Donors with IFG and those with FPG ≥126 mg/dL were older, less likely to be non-Hispanic White, had a higher body mass index, and were more likely to be related to their recipient. After 15.7 ± 10.5 y from donation to study close, 4.4% died, 29.4% developed hypertension, 13.8% developed proteinuria, and 41 (0.5%) developed ESKD. In both the logistic and Cox models, IFG was associated with a higher diabetes risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.30) and hypertension (aHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.65; P = 0.003 for both), but not higher risk of proteinuria or ESKD. The multivariable risk of mortality in donors with ≥126 mg/dL was higher than the 2 other groups, but risks of proteinuria, cardiovascular disease, and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar to those with FPG <126 mg/dL. Three cases of ESKD developed in the 250 donors with FPG ≥126 mg/dL at 18.6 ± 10.3 y after donation (aHR, 5.36; 95% CI, 1.0-27.01; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Donors with IFG and the majority of donors with ≥126 mg/dL do well and perhaps should not be routinely excluded from donation.

Considerations for utilizing medullary sponge kidney allografts in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) disease predisposes patients to recurrent nephrolithiasis, which affects one in every 5000 people in the United States.

METHODS

We report a rare case of a pediatric recipient of a living donor MSK transplant and discuss considerations when discussing risks and benefits of accepting MSK allografts for this population.

RESULTS

The recipient was admitted due to concerns for nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and urinary tract infection at 1-month post-transplant. The hydronephrosis was resolved by surgical removal of an encrusted ureteral stent; this was followed by supplementation with oral medications to prevent future episodes of nephrolithiasis. The recipient did not have any further episodes after this as seen at a 1-year follow-up. The donor has remained well through this period.

CONCLUSIONS

With increasing organ shortages, the use of variety of donors may need to be considered to enlarge the organ pool.

The association of living donor source with patient and graft survival among kidney transplant recipients in the ERA-EDTA Registry - a retrospective study

In this study we aimed to compare patient and graft survival of kidney transplant recipients who received a kidney from a living‐related donor (LRD) or living‐unrelated donor (LUD). Adult patients in the ERA‐EDTA Registry who received their first kidney transplant in 1998–2017 were included. Ten‐year patient and graft survival were compared between LRD and LUD transplants using Cox regression analysis. In total, 14 370 patients received a kidney from a living donor. Of those, 9212 (64.1%) grafts were from a LRD, 5063 (35.2%) from a LUD and for 95 (0.7%), the donor type was unknown. Unadjusted five‐year risks of death and graft failure (including death as event) were lower for LRD transplants than for LUD grafts: 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7–4.6) and 10.8% (95% CI: 10.1–11.5) versus 6.5% (95% CI: 5.7–7.4) and 12.2% (95% CI: 11.2–13.3), respectively. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, associations disappeared with hazard ratios of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87–1.13) for patient survival and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.94–1.14) for graft survival. Unadjusted risk of death‐censored graft failure was similar, but after adjustment, it was higher for LUD transplants (1.19; 95% CI: 1.04–1.35). In conclusion, patient and graft survival of LRD and LUD kidney transplant recipients was similar, whereas death‐censored graft failure was higher in LUD. These findings confirm the importance of both living kidney donor types.

Challenges for the Travelling Donor: Variability Between Donor Workup and Donor Surgery in the Canadian Kidney Paired Exchange Program

BACKGROUND

A primary obstacle to providing renal transplantation is limited access to donated kidneys. The living-donor pool for renal allografts was greatly expanded through implementation of a kidney paired donation program. Whereas some programs ship donor kidneys to the site of renal transplantation, others send the donor to the site of transplantation. Performing the nephrectomy and transplantation at the same location may optimize functional renal outcomes, but preferred surgical approaches may differ between surgical teams performing the donor workup and donor surgery. Our objective was to identify incongruence between the surgery planned by the team that performed the donor's workup, and the surgery that took place at the site of donation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed between the site of preoperative surgical planning, and the site of surgery for kidney donors in the Canadian kidney paired donation program.

RESULTS

Fifty-one donors were preoperatively prepared in any of six Canadian provinces, and then underwent surgery in a different province. The surgical procedure performed for 31% of the patients' nephrectomies differed from the procedure suggested by the surgical team who conducted the preoperative workup. Half of these differences were between left laparoscopic and left laparoscopic hand-assisted, but the remainder included more substantial changes of sides and/or laparoscopic versus open procedures.

CONCLUSION

Optimal patient care is challenged in a kidney paired donation program that uses the "traveling donor" approach due to differing surgical techniques selected by the surgeon at the site of donor workup and the surgeon at the site of donation.

Outcomes of living kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are more likely to have reduced kidney function develop over time. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and safety outcomes of living kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital to assess the outcomes of living kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis. All 6 adults with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent nephrectomy as living kidney donors between January 2000 and September 2014 were included. Eighteen nondonors with rheumatoid arthritis (3 nondonors per donor) were randomly selected for comparison by matching the year of birth and comorbidity score.

RESULTS

None of the donors with rheumatoid arthritis had a flare-up of arthritis at a median follow-up time of 5.9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1-7.5 years), while 5 (27.8%) nondonors with rheumatoid arthritis had a flare-up at a median follow-up time of 4.7 years (IQR, 3.1-6.7 years). After nephrectomy, donors' estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased to a mean of 43.53 (SD, 4) mL/min per 1.73 m2 at 7 days after the index date. The estimated glomerular filtration rate of donors subsequently increased significantly at rate of 3.99 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (P<.001). None of the donors with rheumatoid arthritis had end-stage renal disease develop or died at median follow-up times of 5.9 (IQR, 3.1-7.5) years and 8.2 (IQR, 5.8-9.7) years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Healthy kidney donors with rheumatoid arthritis have good outcomes, with no increased risk of decline in renal function, end-stage renal disease, or death.

The Full Spectrum of Clinical Ethical Issues in Kidney Failure. Findings of a Systematic Qualitative Review

BACKGROUND

When treating patients with kidney failure, unavoidable ethical issues often arise. Current clinical practice guidelines some of them, but lack comprehensive information about the full range of relevant ethical issues in kidney failure. A systematic literature review of such ethical issues supports medical professionalism in nephrology, and offers a solid evidential base for efforts that aim to improve ethical conduct in health care.

AIM

To identify the full spectrum of clinical ethical issues that can arise for patients with kidney failure in a systematic and transparent manner.

METHOD

A systematic review in Medline (publications in English or German between 2000 and 2014) and Google Books (with no restrictions) was conducted. Ethical issues were identified by qualitative text analysis and normative analysis.

RESULTS

The literature review retrieved 106 references that together mentioned 27 ethical issues in clinical care of kidney failure. This set of ethical issues was structured into a matrix consisting of seven major categories and further first and second-order categories.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematically-derived matrix helps raise awareness and understanding of the complexity of ethical issues in kidney failure. It can be used to identify ethical issues that should be addressed in specific training programs for clinicians, clinical practice guidelines, or other types of policies dealing with kidney failure.

Outcomes of living kidney donors with medullary sponge kidney

BACKGROUND

Patients with medullary sponge kidney (MSK) commonly encounter recurrent nephrolithiasis. The existing knowledge on safety of donors with MSK has not been studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital to assess the outcomes of living kidney donors with MSK. All adults with MSK (N = 26) who underwent nephrectomy as living kidney donors between January 2000 and September 2014 were included. Non-donors with MSK (N = 78) were randomly selected by matching the year of birth and the comorbidity score with a ratio of 1:3 for comparison.

RESULTS

The incident rates of symptomatic stone were 0.7, 0.4 and 4.9 events/100 patient-years in donors, recipients and non-donors, respectively. After adjusting for history of kidney stones and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the kidney stone-related event was significantly lower in donors than in non-donors (hazard ratio 0.14; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.66). One recipient of MSK living donor had symptomatic stone at median follow-up time of 8.4 years (interquartile range 5.6-12.4 years). None of MSK donors had hypercalciuria, hypocitraturia or hyperoxaluria prior to kidney donation. At 5 years after the index surgery date, there was no significant difference in eGFR between donors and non-donors (76.1 versus 70.9 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are reassuring for the safety of MSK kidney donors with normal kidney function, low kidney stone risk and no significant comorbidity.

Study of the risk factors and complications of diabetes mellitus after live kidney donation

OBJECTIVES

Kidney donors, similar to the general population, are at risk for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The course of donors who develop T2DM has not been well studied. This work estimates the incidence of diabetes after kidney donation, and some risk factors and complications of diabetes mellitus postdonation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study examined the records of 2267 donors who donated one of their kidneys between 1976 and 2014 at the Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt, and who were regularly followed up at its outpatient clinic. A total of 388 donors were included in the study, and their medical records were revised.

RESULTS

Postdonation weight gain and family history of diabetes mellitus were statistically significant for the development of diabetes mellitus, high or very high albuminuria, and/or decreased creatinine clearance. Metformin and insulin use seemed to significantly reduce the protein excretion and creatinine clearance decline in the studied group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant impact of a family history of diabetes mellitus on the development of high or very high albuminuria and/or decreased creatinine clearance.

A study on the development of public campaign messages for organ donation promotion in Korea

This study aims to find an effective method of expressing a message in public service ads by investigating whether or not a message framing type affects the outcome. Specifically, the study looks into the effects of messaging on organ donation by identifying how the type of message framing (positive vs. negative) and appeal type (rational vs. emotional) affect the attitude and behavioural intention of the consumer. The individual characteristics of each subject such as altruistic mind, level of self-monitoring and issue involvement were selected as intermediate variables that may affect the impact of a message. The study therefore tries to establish a proposition that can be used to generate an effective promotional message on organ donation in a systematic way.

Identifying potential kidney donors using social networking web sites

Social networking sites like Facebook may be a powerful tool for increasing rates of live kidney donation. They allow for wide dissemination of information and discussion and could lessen anxiety associated with a face-to-face request for donation. However, sparse data exist on the use of social media for this purpose. We searched Facebook, the most popular social networking site, for publicly available English-language pages seeking kidney donors for a specific individual, abstracting information on the potential recipient, characteristics of the page itself, and whether potential donors were tested. In the 91 pages meeting inclusion criteria, the mean age of potential recipients was 37 (range: 2-69); 88% were US residents. Other posted information included the individual's photograph (76%), blood type (64%), cause of kidney disease (43%), and location (71%). Thirty-two percent of pages reported having potential donors tested, and 10% reported receiving a live-donor kidney transplant. Those reporting donor testing shared more potential recipient characteristics, provided more information about transplantation, and had higher page traffic. Facebook is already being used to identify potential kidney donors. Future studies should focus on how to safely, ethically, and effectively use social networking sites to inform potential donors and potentially expand live kidney donation.

Evaluation of the medically complex living kidney donor

Due to organ shortage and difficulties for availability of cadaveric donors, living donor transplantation is an important choice for having allograft. Live donor surgery is elective and easier to organize prior to starting dialysis thereby permitting preemptive transplantation as compared to cadaveric transplantation. Because of superior results with living kidney transplantation, efforts including the usage of “Medically complex living donors” are made to increase the availability of organs for donation. The term “Complex living donor” is probably preferred for all suboptimal donors where decision-making is a problem due to lack of sound medical data or consensus guidelines. Donors with advanced age, obesity, asymptomatic microhematuria, proteinuria, hypertension, renal stone disease, history of malignancy and with chronic viral infections consist of this complex living donors. This medical complex living donors requires careful evaluation for future renal risk. In this review we would like to present the major issues in the evaluation process of medically complex living kidney donor.

The utilization and advantages of an exchange donor program in living donor renal transplantation: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

The availability of donors is a major limiting factor in living donor renal transplantation. Approximately one third of patients with end-stage renal disease have willing potential living donors who are blood type or cross-match incompatible. The living donor kidney exchange has become an efficient solution for recipients in this situation. We analyzed the outcome and advantages of an exchange donor program compared with ABO-incompatible transplantation and desensitized protocol transplantation for highly sensitized patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 152 exchange donor cases from 1991 to 2010. We analyzed the risk factors, outcomes, matching factors, complication rates, and acute rejection rates of this program compared with other alternative strategies.

RESULTS

In our center, 22% of total living donor kidney transplantations were performed through an exchange program and an expanded donor pool. The graft survival, complication, and acute rejection rates were not significantly different compared with the alternatives. The severe complication rates were lower than with the alternatives and the immunosuppressant protocol and preoperative preparation were simpler. Blood type O recipients who registered in the exchange program showed no significant differences from the living related groups (P = .45), which were similar to the proportions for other ABO types. Upon multivariate analysis, an acute rejection episode and use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were significant factors associated with graft survival (P = .015 and P = .007; odds ratio [OR] 5.968 and 7.324; 95% confidence interval [CI] .003-.533 and .098-.690).

CONCLUSION

Although exchange donor programs are not the sole solution, they show several advantages, such as the prescription of standard immunosuppression, simple preoperative preparation, low cost, and modest rates of severe complications compared with ABO-incompatible transplantation or desensitized protocols.

Diabetes after kidney donation

Kidney donors, similar to the general population, are at risk for development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The course of donors who develop T2DM has not been studied. We surveyed 3777 kidney donors regarding the development of T2DM. Of the 2954 who responded, 154 developed T2DM 17.7 +/- 9.0 years after donation. The multivariable risk of development of T2DM was associated with type 1 DM in the recipient, male gender and body mass index >30 kg/m(2) at time of donation. Compared to age, gender, duration after donation and body mass index (BMI)-matched non-diabetic donor controls; diabetic donors were more likely to have hypertension (70.8% vs. 36.2%, p = 0.005), proteinuria (18.8% vs. 3.9%, p < 0.0001) but had a similar serum creatinine. eGFR change after T2DM development was -0.80 +/- 0.94 mL/min/year, -0.70 +/- 0.86 in nondiabetic donors with similar duration after donation and -0.61 +/- 0.76 mL/min/year in age, gender, BMI and duration after donation matched nondiabetic donor controls. These preliminary and short-term data demonstrate that factors associated with T2DM in kidney donors are similar to those in the general population and donors screened carefully at the time of donation do not appear to have an acceleration of diabetic kidney disease.

Pregnancy and birth after kidney donation: the Norwegian experience

Reports on pregnancies in kidney donors are scarce. The aim was to assess pregnancy outcomes for previous donors nationwide. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway holds records of births since 1967. Linkage with the Norwegian Renal Registry provided data on pregnancies of kidney donors 1967-2002. A random sample from the Medical Birth Registry was control group, as was pregnancies in kidney donors prior to donation. Differences between groups were assessed by two-sided Fisher's exact tests and with generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). We identified 326 donors with 726 pregnancies, 106 after donation. In unadjusted analysis (Fisher) no differences were observed in the occurrence of preeclampsia (p = 0.22). In the adjusted analysis (GLMM) it was more common in pregnancies after donation, 6/106 (5.7%), than in pregnancies before donation 16/620 (2.6%) (p = 0.026). The occurrence of stillbirths after donation was 3/106 (2.8%), before donation 7/620 (1.1%), in controls (1.1%) (p = 0.17). No differences were observed in the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcome in kidney donors and in the general population in unadjusted analysis. Our finding of more frequent preeclampsia in pregnancies after kidney donation in the secondary analysis must be interpreted with caution, as the number of events was low.

Commercial cadaveric renal transplant: an ethical rather than medical issue

Donor organ shortage is a universal problem. The organ source has been extended to controversial death-penalty outlaws in certain countries. It was claimed that commercial transplant had a worse short-term clinical outcome. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term outcome of patients receiving commercial cadaveric renal transplant. Seventy-five renal transplant recipients receiving long-term follow-up were included. Thirty-one patients received overseas commercial cadaveric transplant. Forty-four patients had legal domestic transplant in Taiwan. The age of the patients receiving the commercial cadaveric transplant was significantly older than those with legal domestic transplant (commerical vs. legal: 46.1 +/- 11.4 vs. 35.6 +/- 9.0 yr old, p < 0.001). The renal function estimated by creatinine and 1/creatinine up to eight yr showed no significant difference between the two groups. The graft survivals of the two groups were not different. The mortality rate between the two groups was comparable in 10 yr (91.1% in domestic and 88.9% in overseas). There was no significant difference in de novo viral hepatitis, cytomegalovirus infection, and acute rejection. The clinical outcome of overseas commercial cadaveric transplant was not different from the domestic legal transplant. To stop the unethical procedure, ethnicity and humanity are the major concerns.

Effect of donor age on the outcome of living-related kidney transplantation

The study compared the results of kidney transplantation from living-related donors older and younger than 60 years. The 273 kidney graft recipients were divided into group 1 (115 recipients of older grafts) and group 2 (158 recipients of younger grafts). The frequency of acute rejection (AR) episodes was similar in both groups but slow graft function occurred more frequently in group 1. The frequency of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in the first post-transplant year was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Patient and graft survival was significantly worse in group 1. Risk factors for graft loss were the difference between donor and recipient age and AR. Donor age and graft function were risk factors for patient death. Although kidneys from older donors provide a statistically poorer transplant outcome, they are clinically acceptable, especially when waiting time is prolonged and access to dialysis limited.

Factors that influence the development of an organ donation program

The shortage of cadaveric donors is a universal problem that imposes a severe limit on the number of patients who can benefit from transplantation. At the same time, there is an ever-increasing demand for cadaveric solid organs all over the world. The organ shortage is not due to a lack of potential donors, but rather to a failure to turn many potential into actual donors. Spain is the only example in the world of continuous improvement in cadaveric organ donation registered in a large country during more than 10 years. This success is due to a proactive donor detection program performed by well-trained transplant coordinators, introduction of systematic death audits in hospitals, and the combination of a positive social atmosphere, an adequate management of mass media relations, and on adequate economic reimbursement for the hospitals. This model can be partial or totally adapted to other countries or regions, if basic conditions are guaranteed. A careful study of local characteristics, which influence organ donation in a direct or indirect way, should be performed before planning specific actions to improve organ donor rates. The principle factors that influence the development of this type of program are described in this article.

Rewarded gift for living renal donors

Although the waiting list for renal transplantation is growing from year to year, the participation of unrelated living donors in kidney transplantation remains controversial. Patients want to be transplanted as soon as possible, not years later. Nevertheless, cadaveric organ donation has not been able to meet the requirements for all patients in need. With a continuous shortage of organs, the use of living unrelated donors is likely to decrease patient suffering and waiting list mortality. The excellent short- and long-term results of living unrelated transplantation have stimulated physicians toward a wider use of this donor pool. Therefore, transplants from living donors, whether related or unrelated, may be proposed as a therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease patients. In this article we explain the necessity of compensating altruistic living donors as an incentive. It is concluded that living unrelated renal transplantation programs should be legalized and controlled by international and national transplant societies to prevent illegal trade and to provide better care for donors.

Changing ethics in renal transplantation: presentation of Iran model

This article reviews renal transplant (RTx) activity in USA to show that the ethics of RTx are changing, with steadily increasing numbers of living unrelated donors (LURD). In developing countries the numbers of RTx are inadequate emphasizing the need for controlled LURD RTx programs. The condemnation of all forms of compensated LURD RTx results in many patient deaths and the associated suffering is unethical. The Iran model, adopted in 1988, permits compensated and controlled LURD RTx. It has eliminated the RTx waiting list in Iran. At the end of 2002, among the 14,288 RTxs performed, 78% were from LURDs. The recipients of >50% of the kidneys from LURDs have been from the poor socioeconomic class of Iran. It has been recommended that each society should provide legally binding life-long benefits for LURDs.

Guidelines for conducting a psychiatric evaluation of the unrelated kidney donor

Living unrelated kidney donors have been increasingly sought out as potential resources for patients with end-stage renal disease. Several psychiatric issues must be factored into the presurgical evaluation of prospective donors. This paper describes a proposed guideline intended to assist clinicians in the psychiatric evaluation of prospective kidney donors. Topics covered in the interview include the prospective donor's stability and ability to make an informed decision, the donor's understanding of the recipient's illness and of the transplant surgery, and extenuating factors that may influence the decision to donate. While efficient and thorough, the guideline is intended to be flexible enough to address the variety of issues that can affect the prospective donor's decision to pursue surgery.

Should people who donate a kidney to a stranger be permitted to choose their recipients? Views of the United States public

BACKGROUND

Several transplant centers have begun to accept kidneys donated by altruistic living strangers. Many of these centers insist that such donations be nondirected, meaning that the donors may not choose their recipients. On the other hand, some authors have argued that anonymous donors should be allowed to select their recipients. This study was designed to explore public attitudes toward this issue.

METHODS

Two telephone surveys of US adults, each including more than 1000 participants, were conducted. The first asked about the general acceptability of allowing altruistic strangers to direct donations, the willingness to donate a kidney to a stranger, and the impact of permitting directed donation on willingness to give. The second survey asked about the acceptability of directed donation to members of specific groups.

RESULTS

About one quarter of the respondents said they would donate a kidney to a stranger for free, and the vast majority of them would donate even if they could not choose their recipients. Two thirds would not allow anonymous kidney donors to direct their gifts to a member of a specific racial or religious group, but three quarters would support kidney donations directed to children.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the current policy of several transplant centers that people who wish to donate a kidney to a stranger are not permitted to choose their recipients on the basis of membership in a racial or religious group. On the other hand, theoretical considerations and the results of this study suggest that people who wish to donate a kidney only to an unknown child should be permitted to do so.

Benefit of child-to-parent kidney donation

Use of child-to-parent (CTP) kidney donation may be limited because of ethical concerns as well as doubts about its effectiveness. We used the United Network for Organ Sharing database to examine the effectiveness of CTP kidney donation compared with other types of living-related (LD) kidney donation and to cadaveric kidney donation. Data from 56 873 kidney transplants performed between 1988 and 1998 showed significantly greater transplant and patient survival for CTP kidney transplants compared with cadaveric kidney transplants. The average gain in kidney transplant half-life is 3.6 years for a CTP compared with a cadaveric kidney transplant, and it is estimated that this gain for the recipient far outweighs the 1 in 3000 risk of death to the donor associated with kidney donation. We conclude that CTP kidney donation should not be discouraged, and represents a useful source of transplantable kidneys.

Screening criteria for feline renal transplant recipients and donors

Renal transplantation is associated with several potential complications. Early selection and appropriate screening of candidates has reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with this procedure in human beings. In veterinary medicine, the important process of identification and screening of candidates for renal transplantation occurs primarily in private general or specialty practice. This article reviews guidelines for screening of candidates for renal transplantation and related publications in both veterinary and human literature in an attempt to provide comprehensive information to practitioners involved in the selection process. It is anticipated that early referral of stable cats for renal transplantation will further improve the likelihood of a successful outcome.

[Analysis of living related kidney donors and their postoperative course]

Lack of cadaveric organs for transplantation resulted in increased number of living related kidney donors examinations and consequent transplantations in our Department. Donor procedure, selection, drop-outs and final results for living related donors (LRD) were retrospectively analyzed in this paper. Between 1987 and 1994 202 potential LRD were examined. Most of them were females (59%) and about 30% were older than 60 years. The family relation between LRD and recipients were: parents (95%), siblings (3%), grandmother/grandfather (1.5%) and uncle (0.5%). Potential LRD were informed on risks, advantages and procedure of living donor transplantation. After primary information 26% of potential LRD gave up further examinations. Following immunological and clinical evaluations 48% of LRD actually donated a kidney. The other 26% were excluded during the selection procedure. High immunological risks including ABO incompatibility, HLA mismatches and positive cross match test were the reasons for drop outs of 35 potential LRD (17%). Five more donors were excluded for medical reasons: one because of low creatinine clearance and four because of neoplasms, discovered during examination (kidney, laryngeal, lung). Fourteen transplantation were not realized due to different recipient reasons: 5 of them had clinical contraindications, two died and in 7 cadaveric kidney transplantations were performed. Mild hypertension, coronary disease and diabetes mellitus type 2 were presented in 5 LRD accepted for transplantation. Five more had to be operated before donation (abdominal or urological operation). Early complications after donor nephrectomy were acute renal failure, stress ulcus, pleuropneumonia in three and thromboflebitis in two donors. In conclusion, although kidney transplantation from LRD is highly successful, careful examination during selection procedure is indispensable.

Conscription of cadaveric organs for transplantation: let's at least talk about it

Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for many patients with end-stage renal disease, and for people with other end-stage organ diseases, transplantation may offer the only hope for survival. Unfortunately, the ability to deliver this medical miracle is limited by a severe shortage of human organs. As a result, many people with irreversible organ failure die while waiting for an organ to become available. Compounding this tragic situation is the fact that many usable organs are being buried instead of being transplanted because of the relatively low efficiency of cadaveric organ procurement. One of the major barriers to procurement is family refusal. Several proposals designed to increase consent rates have been suggested, but it is highly unlikely that any of them would approach the 100% efficiency of organ procurement that patients with end-stage organ failure so desperately need. However, there is a rarely discussed alternative that would likely achieve this important goal---conscription of cadaveric organs. Under this plan, all usable organs would be removed from recently deceased people and made available for transplantation; consent would be neither required nor requested and, with the possible exception of people with religious objections, opting-out would not be possible. In this article, we review the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. We conclude that consent for cadaveric organ removal is not ethically required and that, from an ethical point of view, conscription is actually preferable.

Outcome of living unrelated (commercial) renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Due to inadequate cadaveric and living related organ supply, many end-stage renal disease patients go to Third World countries for commercial transplantation, although the high risk of complications is well established and ethical arguments debate this practice.

METHODS

The midterm outcome of 115 patients who had been commercially transplanted in various countries and admitted to our center for post-transplant care and follow-up between 1992 and 1999 was retrospectively analyzed. Data considering the transplantation practice and post-transplant course were collected from the patient files. Outcome of these patients was compared with those with a living related transplant performed at our center.

RESULTS

The patients (91 male and 24 female; mean age of 42 +/- 12 years) were transplanted in India (N = 106), Iraq (N = 7), and Iran (N = 2). The mean follow-up period was 64.5 +/- 23.9 months. Post-transplant course was complicated by numerous surgical and/or medical complications, and many of the latter were unconventional infections caused by malaria, invasive fungal infections, and pneumonia due to various opportunistic pathogens. Overall, 52 patients still have functioning allografts, while 22 lost their grafts, 20 died, and 21 were lost to follow-up. Graft survival rates at two, five, and seven years were 84, 66, and 53%, respectively, for the study group, while it was 86, 78, and 73% for living related transplantations performed at our center (P = 0.036). Patient survival rates for the same periods were 90, 80, and 74% for the study group and 90, 85, and 80% for the living related transplantations (P = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the ongoing ethical debate, commercial transplantation carries a high risk of unconventional complications, and despite that the patient survival rate is comparable, graft survival is worse than conventional living related transplantations at the midterm.