Eating and drinking in labor: the influence of caregiver advice on women's behavior

Effect of a carbohydrate-rich beverage on rate of cesarean delivery in primigravidae with epidural labor analgesia: a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Labor represents a period of significant physical activity. Inefficient energy supply may delay labor process and even lead to cesarean delivery. Herein we investigated whether ingestion of a carbohydrate-rich beverage could reduce cesarean delivery in laboring women with epidural analgesia.

METHODS

This multicenter randomized trial was conducted in obstetrician-led maternity units of nine tertiary hospitals in China. Primigravidae with single term cephalic pregnancy who were preparing for vaginal birth under epidural analgesia were randomized to intake a carbohydrate-rich beverage or commercially available low-carbohydrate beverages during labor. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal feeling of hunger, assessed with an 11-point scale where 0 indicated no hunger and 10 the most severe hunger, and maternal and neonatal blood glucose after childbirth.

RESULTS

Between 17 January 2018 and 20 July 2018, 2008 women were enrolled and randomized, 1953 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between the two groups (11.3% [111/982] with carbohydrate-rich beverage vs. 10.9% [106/971] with low-carbohydrate beverages; relative risk 1.04, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.33; p = 0.79). Women in the carbohydrate-rich beverage group had lower subjective hunger score (median 3 [interquartile range 2 to 5] vs. 4 [2 to 6]; median difference - 1; 95% CI - 1 to 0; p < 0.01); their neonates had less hypoglycemia (1.0% [10/968] vs. 2.3% [22/956]; relative risk 0.45; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.94; p = 0.03) when compared with those in the low-carbohydrate beverage group. They also had higher rates of maternal hyperglycemia (6.9% [67/965] vs. 1.9% [18/953]; p < 0.01) and neonatal hyperglycemia (9.2% [89/968] vs. 5.8% [55/956]; p < 0.01), but none required special treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For laboring primigravidae with epidural analgesia, ingestion of a carbohydrate-rich beverage compared with low-carbohydrate beverages did not reduce cesarean delivery, but relieved maternal hunger and reduced neonatal hypoglycemia at the expense of increased hyperglycemia of both mothers and neonates. Optimal rate of carbohydrate supplementation remains to be determined.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.chictr.org.cn ; identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-17011994 ; registered on 14 July 2017.

Women's view on fasting during labor in a tertiary care obstetric unit. A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Maternal satisfaction and comfort may in part depend on fasting instruction given during labor. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction and the wishes of parturients with regards to fasting during labor.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study was conducted among parturients assessing the fasting instructions they were given. We assessed whether women did have any oral intake during labor and focused on women's view of fasting during labor. Maternal discomfort related to thirst and hunger was assessed using 0-10 scales.

RESULTS

A total of 193 women were included, among whom 71 (37 %) received spontaneously given instructions and 60 (31 %) received instruction upon request. One hundred sixteen (60 %) women were allowed to drink clear fluids, in a limited way for 106 women (91 % of those concerned); 119 women did drink clear fluids during labor. One hundred thirty-two (68 %) women had a thirst-related discomfort score ≥ 4 without any statistical difference whether they had or had not drunk clear fluids. Colder water, unrestricted volume of water and sweet drink were desired by 74 (64 %), 38 (33 %) and 28 (24 %) women who had been allowed to drink, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results emphasize that thirst contributes to maternal discomfort during labor. Permitting limited intake of water does not ensure high maternal satisfaction. Fresh clear fluids, unrestricted amounts of fluids and sweet fluids could contribute to improve maternal comfort.

Effects of date fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) on labor and delivery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rate of cesarean section is increasing in all over the world with different drafts in various countries. This growth increases unpleasant outcomes of delivery. Recent studies explained the benefits of date palm fruit on labor process improvement. Date fruit can be considered as a factor for increasing vaginal delivery and also reducing the frequency of caesarean section in order to prevent its great complications. This systematic review has been designed to review clinical studies that investigate the effects of date palm fruit on labor outcomes (duration of labor stages, bishop score, and frequency of cesarean section) compared with routine cares.

METHODS

This study was performed in 2019. Required data has been collected from electronic databases and manual searches. All randomized clinical trials evaluating the effects of date palm fruit on labor and delivery that were published from January 2000 to August 2019 in English and Persian languages, were incorporated in this systematic review. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the risk of bias assessment of Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews, and were then reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Meta-Analysis showed that date fruit consumption can significantly reduce active phase of labor (three trials with 380 participants; (MD = - 109.3, 95%CI (- 196.32, - 22.29; I² = 89%), P = 0.01), and also it can significantly improve the bishop score (two trials with 320 participants; MD = 2.45, 95%CI (1.87, 3.04; I² = 0%), P < 0.00001). Date fruit consumption had no effects on the duration of first, second, and third stages of labor, and the frequency of cesarean section.

CONCLUSION

Date can reduce the duration of active phase and improve the bishop score; however, due to from the low to mediate quality of the studies; it seems that the other studies are needed to prove these results better than this.

Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour.

DESIGN

literature review (1988-2009).

SETTING

Westernised maternity care settings.

PARTICIPANTS

women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.

No effect of energy supply during childbirth on delivery outcomes in nulliparous women: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

The effect of providing oral energy supplements of energy on duration of labour and labour outcomes remains to be clarified. The purpose of this study was to examine whether extra energy supply beyond a self-regulated dietary intake during labour would shorten duration of labour in nulliparous women. A total of 213 healthy women at gestational age >36 weeks received either 1 litre of isotonic energy-drink (n = 111) or placebo-drink (n = 102) at the start of labour. A total of 61% in the intervention group gave birth within the hospital median of 9 hours, compared with 58% in the placebo group (p = 0.68). The mean (SD) durations of labour were 528 (240) minutes and 506 (233) minutes in the intervention and placebo group (p = 0.50), respectively. Extra oral supply of 1 litre energy drink beyond self-regulated intake of food and drink to healthy nulliparous women in birth does not affect the duration of labour.

Intrapartum maternal glucose infusion and fetal acid-base status

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of an intrapartum infusion of a lactated Ringer solution or a glucose-boosted saline solution on the acid-base status of umbilical arterial blood.

METHOD

In a prospective clinical trial 178 women in labor were randomized to receive intravenously either a lactated Ringer solution or a saline solution boosted with 5% glucose. Umbilical arterial blood was then assessed for acid-base status.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the lactated Ringer group and the glucose group in umbilical artery pH values (7.25+/-0.07 vs. 7.28+/-0.06; P=0.008), pCO2 values (44.8+/-5.6 mm Hg vs. 41.6+/-4.1 mm Hg; P=0.001), and base excess (-7.3+/-2.1 mEq/L vs. -6.6+/-1.8 mEq/L; P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Intrapartum intravenous fluid containing a 5% glucose solution reduces umbilical cord acidemia and hypercarbia.

The effect of unrestricted oral carbohydrate intake on labor progress

OBJECTIVE

To determine if unrestricted oral carbohydrate intake during labor reduced the incidence of dystocia in low-risk nulliparous women.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A randomized clinical trial at a university-affiliated hospital in southeastern Ontario. Low-risk nulliparous women were randomized between 30 and 40 weeks gestation to either an intervention or usual care group.

INTERVENTION

Women in the intervention group received, prenatally, guidelines about food and fluid intake during labor and were encouraged to eat and drink as they pleased during labor. Women in the usual care group received no prelabor information and were restricted to ice chips and water during labor in the hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The incidence of dystocia, defined as a cervical dilatation rate of less than 0.5 cm/hr for a period of 4 hrs after a cervical dilatation of 3 cm.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-eight women were randomized to the intervention (n = 163) or usual care (n = 165) groups. Women in the intervention group reported a significantly different pattern of oral intake during early labor in the hospital (chi(2) = 40.7, p < .001). The incidence of dystocia was 36% (n = 58) in the intervention group and 44% (n = 72) in the usual care group and was not significantly different (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.46, 1.11). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes or in the incidence of adverse maternal or neonatal complications.

CONCLUSION

Eating and drinking early in labor had no significant impact on the incidence of dystocia and/or adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Carbohydrate solution intake during labour just before the start of the second stage: a double-blind study on metabolic effects and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of oral carbohydrate ingestion on clinical outcome and on maternal and fetal metabolism.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, randomised study.

SETTING

Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.

POPULATION

Two hundred and two nulliparous women.

METHODS

In labour, at 8 to 10 cm of cervical dilatation, the women were asked to drink a solution containing either 25 g carbohydrates or placebo. In a subgroup of 28 women, metabolic parameters were measured.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of instrumental deliveries, fetal and maternal glucose, free fatty acids, lactate, pH, Pco2, base excess/deficit and beta-hydroxybutyrate.

RESULTS

Drinking a carbohydrate-enriched solution just before starting the second stage of labour did not reduce instrumental delivery rate (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.3). Caesarean section rate was lower in the carbohydrate group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (1% vs 7%, RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-1.2). In the carbohydrate group, maternal free fatty acids decreased and the lactate increased. In the umbilical cord there was a positive venous-arterial lactate difference in the carbohydrate group and a negative one in the placebo group, but the differences in pH and base deficit were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Intake of carbohydrates just before the second stage does not reduce instrumental delivery rate. The venous-arterial difference in the umbilical cord suggested lactate transport to the fetal circulation but did not result in fetal acidaemia.

NPO during labor. Is there any scientific validation?

Maternal death from pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents has virtually disappeared in the United Kingdom. The one case documented in the most recent triennial report was a woman with multiorgan failure in intensive care and is probably not relevant to the current debate [1]. Although not so well documented, other Western countries seem to be experiencing the same decline in maternal death from this cause. At the same time, the burden of proof is falling increasingly on obstetric anesthesiologists as obstetricians and midwives demand that NPO policies should be rejected, unless anesthesiologists can prove that they are necessary. Without any proof of benefit, many midwives actively encourage eating in women who do not really want to eat. A hospital manager who wants to divert money to other areas of health care might make the same argument about employing less experienced--and therefore cheaper--anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists on the labor floor. Although no self-respecting obstetric anesthesiologist would accept such a situation, there is still no randomized controlled trial that proves that experienced anesthesiologists reduce maternal mortality. Similarly it is difficult for a mother to comprehend the negligible risk of pulmonary aspiration during labor while her care providers insist that it would be more dangerous for her to cross a busy road! Against a background of conflicting advice from midwives and medical practitioners, the mother is likely to eat if she feels so inclined. Pulmonary aspiration is a rare complication, so even if a light diet in labor became acceptable, it is likely that it would take many years for a subsequent increase in maternal mortality to become apparent. It would be disappointing if mistakes made by a previous generation had to be relearned in the twenty-first century. Increasingly, media-controlled pressure groups dictate health fashions, and the physicians frequently can only stand on the sidelines and advise. Most obstetric anesthesiologists agree that a rigid NPO policy in labor is no longer appropriate and that at least water or ice chips should be allowed. Current evidence suggests that solids and semi-solids should be avoided once a woman is in active labor or requests analgesia. The appropriate advice is to allow a carefully audited introduction of isotonic drinks. These drinks seem to be an effective medium for providing calories while minimizing any increase in gastric volume, and such a policy would be unlikely to reverse the reduction in aspiration that has been achieved over the past 50 years.