The efficacy of postoperative vaginal irradiation in preventing vaginal recurrence in endometrial cancer

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in low-risk endometrial cancer

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in women with low-risk endometrial cancer.

Methods

A dual-institutional, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with ‘low-risk endometrial cancer’ (patients having <50% myometrial invasion with grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer according to their final pathology reports) at two gynecologic oncology centers in Ankara, Turkey. Demographic, clinicopathological and survival data were collected.

Results

We identified 912 women with low-risk endometrial cancer; 53 patients (5.8%) had lymphovascular space invasion. When compared with lymphovascular space invasion-negative patients, lymphovascular space invasion-positive patients were more likely to have post-operative grade 2 disease (p<0.001), deeper myometrial invasion (p=0.003), and larger tumor size (p=0.005). Patients with lymphovascular space invasion were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy when compared with lymphovascular space invasion-negative women (11/53 vs 12/859, respectively; p<0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate for lymphovascular space invasion-positive women was 85.5% compared with 97.0% for lymphovascular space invasion-negative women (p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate for lymphovascular space invasion-positive women was significantly lower than that of lymphovascular space invasion-negative women (88.2% vs 98.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Age ≥60 years (HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.13 to 8.63; p=0.02) and positive lymphovascular space invasion status (HR 6.68, 95% CI 1.60 to 27.88; p=0.009) were identified as independent prognostic factors for decreased overall survival.

Conclusions

Age ≥60 years and positive lymphovascular space invasion status appear to be important prognostic parameters in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer who have undergone complete surgical staging procedures including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Lymphovascular space invasion seems to be associated with an adverse prognosis in women with low-risk endometrial cancer; this merits further assessment on a larger scale with standardization of the lymphovascular space invasion in terms of presence/absence and quantity.

Analysis of the Evolution in the Management of Endometrial Cancer in Italy: A CTF Study

Objective

In 1994 we mailed questionnaires to referral centers in Italy in order to evaluate the different opinions concerning aspects of endometrial cancer treatment, which is still controversial. The data processing showed a significant nonhomogeneity in disease management and prompted the Italian Society of Gynecologic Oncology to define guidelines for endometrial cancer adjuvant treatment. In 2001, we mailed again the same questionnaire to the same referral Centers in Italy. The aim of the second enquiry was the evaluation of changes in endometrial cancer management and the effective impact of the guidelines published.

Methods

The enquiry used the same questionnaires mailed in 1994; actually, we mailed those questionnaires to the same referral centers in Italy twice: in December 2000 and March 2001. The results of both the enquiries were collected in a relational data base, and the statistical evaluations were calculated using SPSS-statistics (Window ver. 8).

Results

Endometrial cancer treatment consists in abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The unique relevant difference as to 1994 consists in the systemic performing of peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer staging. Unlike the previous enquiry, adjuvant radiotherapy is not systematically performed in disease at stage Ic because of the substantial absence of confirmed data demonstrating a real benefit in terms of survival rate. The comparison between the two enquiries shows a significant change in medical planning and diversification attitude according to patient age and menopausal state. The disease management changes in patients over 75 years old, mainly with respect to surgery and primary therapy.

Conclusions

We noted a resistance of many centers to accept some trends actually widespread in the literature but not yet performed in practical clinical.

Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Surgically Staged Stage I-II Endometrial Carcinoma

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine the treatment outcomes and patterns of failure following external beam therapy in patients with pathological stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-three patients with stage I-II endometrial carcinoma surgically staged who were found to have high risk factors and who received postoperative radiation therapy are the subject of this report. High risk factors were: histologic grade II-III, depth of myometrial invasion (DMI) > or =1/2, stage II, poor prognostic histology (clear cell, papillary serous cell) and lymphovascular invasion.

RESULTS

Recurrences were observed in six patients. The recurrences were located in the vagina (1), lung (2), liver (1), and paraaortic lymph nodes (1). Five of the six recurrences were stage IC and II. The overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at five years were 82.9%, 85.0% and 81.3%, respectively. DMI, grade, age and cervical stromal invasion had a significant impact on CSS.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant radiotherapy decreases the rate of relapse in pathologically staged high-risk stage I-II endometrial carcinoma patients. After reviewing the other studies on this subject we conclude that vaginal cuff brachytherapy alone could be used in stage IA grade III and stage IB grade I-II patients because the recurrence rate is low; pelvic radiotherapy + vaginal cuff brachytherapy should be used for stage IC-II disease. Distant metastases occurred in five of our patients and represent a significant type of failure.

Factors associated with survival after relapse in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer treated with surgery alone

Objective

To determine factors influencing overall survival following recurrence (OSFR) in women with low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) treated with surgery alone.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with recurrent “low-risk EC” (patients having less than 50% myometrial invasion [MMI] with grade 1 or 2 endometrioid EC) at 10 gynecologic oncology centers in Turkey. Demographic, clinicopathological, and survival data were collected.

Results

We identified 67 patients who developed recurrence of their EC after initially being diagnosed and treated for low-risk EC. For the entire study cohort, the median time to recurrence (TTR) was 23 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=11.5–34.5; standard error [SE]=5.8) and the median OSFR was 59 months (95% CI=12.7–105.2; SE=23.5). We observed 32 (47.8%) isolated vaginal recurrences, 6 (9%) nodal failures, 19 (28.4%) peritoneal failures, and 10 (14.9%) hematogenous disseminations. Overall, 45 relapses (67.2%) were loco-regional whereas 22 (32.8%) were extrapelvic. According to the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Trial-99, 7 (10.4%) out of 67 women with recurrent low-risk EC were qualified as high-intermediate risk (HIR). The 5-year OSFR rate was significantly higher for patients with TTR ≥36 months compared to those with TTR <36 months (74.3% compared to 33%, p=0.001). On multivariate analysis for OSFR, TTR <36 months (hazard ratio [HR]=8.46; 95% CI=1.65–43.36; p=0.010) and presence of HIR criteria (HR=4.62; 95% CI=1.69–12.58; p=0.003) were significant predictors.

Conclusion

Low-risk EC patients recurring earlier than 36 months and those carrying HIR criteria seem more likely to succumb to their tumors after recurrence.

Is Modified Radical Hysterectomy Needed for Patients with Clinical Stage I/II Endometrial Cancers? A Historical Control Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess whether hysterectomy with wider resection could improve survival by preventing local recurrence.

METHODS

Medical charts of the patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial cancers treated at our hospital between 1990 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effects according to the type of hysterectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were identified: 46 patients treated with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH group) and 201 patients with modified radical hysterectomy (mRH group). No significant differences were observed in OS (p = 0.52) and PFS (p = 0.67) between the two groups. Also, there was no significant difference in the distribution of recurrent sites between the two groups. The patients treated with mRH had a longer operation time and more frequently developed severe adverse events, such as blood loss and lymphedema.

CONCLUSION

In our cohorts, there were no significant differences in both PFS and OS according to surgical procedures, and the mRH group more frequently developed severe adverse events. Overall, clinical benefit was not obtained by mRH in patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial carcinomas.

Survival Outcomes Improved in Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Pelvic or Abdominal Recurrence After Treatment for Stage I/II Endometrial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Pelvic and abdominal recurrences in stage I/II endometrial carcinoma are associated with poor outcomes, yet prognostic factors for survival after recurrence are not well described. Herein, we identify patients with pelvic or abdominal recurrence after surgery for stage I/II endometrial carcinoma and describe symptoms at presentation, prognostic factors, and salvage treatment toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort of 20 consecutively treated patients with recurrence after treatment for stage I/II endometrial carcinoma followed by our Institution's Radiation Oncology Department from 1998 to 2015.

RESULTS

The median time to pelvic or abdominal recurrence was 18.1 months (range, 4.2 to 59.6 mo), with 50% of recurrences at extranodal locations. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 44% and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 82%. Salvage treatments varied widely, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) (7), surgery and RT (3), and surgery, chemotherapy, and RT (3). On univariate analysis of PFS, symptoms at recurrence (P=0.04) and extranodal recurrences (P<0.01) were found to be statistically significant negative prognosticators for PFS. On univariate analysis of OS, increasing age at recurrence and presence of symptoms were found to have a trend toward statistically significant association with negative OS outcomes (P=0.08 and P=0.10, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that long-term survival for pelvic or abdominal recurrences is possible with curative salvage therapy. The presence of symptoms is a negative prognostic factor in treatment outcome, and imaging may be effective for diagnosis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Larger studies need to be performed to confirm these findings.

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy combined with postoperative radiotherapy for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis

The objective of our study was to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy combined with postoperative radiotherapy would have benefits for the disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Electronic searches for studies of adjuvant chemotherapy combined with postoperative radiotherapy in endometrial cancer patients between March 1971 and March 2012 were made on MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane library. Articles with more than 4 stars on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale or a score of more than 4 on the modified Jadad scale were included. A meta-analysis was performed, and pooled hazard ratios (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients whose adjuvant chemotherapy was combined with radiotherapy (the CTx+RTx group) and patients with adjuvant radiotherapy only (the RTx group) were derived from the fixed effect model or random effect model. Three observational studies and 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included in the final analysis. Subgroup analysis for FIGO stage showed that the CTx+RTx group had a more significant survival benefit compared to that of the RTx group in advanced stage endometrial cancer (OS HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.80; PFS HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.77), but no significant benefit in early stage endometrial cancer (OS HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.32; PFS HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.39-2.58). This meta-analysis suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy combined with postoperative radiotherapy could probably reduce disease progression and overall death in patients with advanced-stage disease. In order to examine whether the multimodal treatment has benefit in high-risk endometrial cancer, we need further large-scale RCTs.

Typical and atypical metastatic sites of recurrent endometrial carcinoma

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the imaging findings of typical and atypical metastatic sites of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Typical sites include local pelvic recurrence, pelvic and para-aortic nodes, peritoneum, and lungs. Atypical sites include extra-abdominal lymph nodes, liver, adrenals, brain, bones and soft tissue. It is important for radiologists to recognize the typical and atypical sites of metastases in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Are outcomes of adjuvant vaginal vault brachytherapy in endometrial cancer related to the way it is delivered?

Aims:Endometrial cancer is the commonest malignancy of the female genital tract. Surgery forms the cornerstone of treatment with adjuvant therapy proven to reduce local recurrence without demonstrating a clear survival benefit. The selection of adjuvant therapy is becoming increasingly more complex. The aim of this study was to investigate current adjuvant practices by reviewing outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer treated with intracavitary vaginal brachytherapy (VB).

Materials & Methods:A retrospective analysis was carried out of all women with Stage II endometrial endometroid adenocarcinoma treated at Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield with adjuvant VB from 2003–2006. The data collected and analysed included histology, stage and grade of disease, radiotherapy treatment–related parameters, morbidity, recurrence rates and survival rates. Kaplan-Meier was used to analyse recurrence-free and overall survival rates. Wilson’s score was used to determine statistical significance of outcomes. Attention was focused on the method of treatment delivery, and this was compared with available literature.

Results:In total, 33 patients were identified. All patients were treated with LDR 48 Gy prescribed to the surface of the applicator. Median follow-up was 36 months. Vaginal, pelvic and distant relapse rates were 9%, 15% and 18%, respectively. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 78.8% and 84.8%, respectively. Six of the seven patients (86%) who recurred developed distant metastases, not influenced by VB. No severe (Grade 3 or 4 toxicity) was recorded. When vaginal relapse rates were compared to published trials based on technique used, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated.

Conclusion:Rates of vaginal relapses were comparable to the available literature suggesting current VB practice is an effective adjuvant local treatment. The study highlights the importance of surveillance and patient education regarding toxicity and its prevention with particular attention drawn to vaginal stenosis.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in mexican patients with endometrial carcinoma with emphasis on patients receiving radiotherapy after surgery: an institutional perspective

Aim. To analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma treated in a Latin American institute with emphasis in patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods. A total of 412 patients with endometrial carcinoma admitted to our hospital between 1998 and 2008 were evaluated, retrospectively. The mean age was 55 years (28-87). Two hundred seventy patients received RT following surgery. Stage distribution was as follows: 221 patients (54%) stage I, 86 patients (21%) stage II, and 103 patients (24.5%) stage III and 2 patients (0.5%) stage IVA. Results. Overall survival rate was 95% at 2 years, 84% at 5 years, and 79% at 10 years. By the end of followup, 338 patients (82%) were disease-free, and 13 (3%) were alive with disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, grade, serosal and adnexial involvement as significant predictors for overall survival. Conclusion. The results of our study suggests that early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer with no risk factors should not receive external beam radiotherapy, intermediate risk patients should receive only vaginal vault brachytherapy, and the use of chemotherapy with radiotherapy for patients high-risk and advanced-stage carcinoma the addition of radiotherapy is associated with a better survival being an effective therapeutic option.

Contemporary management of endometrial cancer

The treatment of endometrial cancer has changed substantially in the past decade with the introduction of a new staging system and surgical approaches accompanied by novel adjuvant therapies. Primary surgical treatment is the mainstay of therapy but the effectiveness and extent of lymphadenectomy has been challenged, and its acceptance as a routine procedure varies by country. The role of radiation has evolved and chemotherapy has been incorporated, either alone or combined with radiation, to treat the many patients in whom cancer recurs because of a tumour outside the originally radiated pelvic and lower abdominal area. Use of traditional adjuvant chemotherapeutics has been challenged in clinical trials of new agents with improved side-effect profiles. Novel agents and targeted therapies are being investigated. Research into genetic susceptibility to endometrial cancer and the potential genetic aberrations that might translate into therapeutic interventions continues to increase. Substantial global variability in the treatment of endometrial cancer has led to examination of long-accepted norms, which has resulted in rapidly changing standards. International cooperation in clinical trials will hasten progress in treatment of this ubiquitous cancer.

A role for adjuvant radiation in clinically early carcinoma of the endometrium?

Whereas radiation is recognized as a highly effective treatment modality in endometrial cancer, its role as adjuvant treatment after surgery in clinically early disease is declining. Randomized trials of both pelvic external beam radiation and vaginal vault brachytherapy have been conducted to evaluate their respective contribution. These trials have demonstrated that external beam radiation may decrease pelvic relapse rates compared with observation alone in high intermediate-risk groups, but this does not improve survival. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) Study 2 confirmed that vaginal vault brachytherapy was equivalent to external beam radiation in preventing vaginal relapse. However, given the high rate of salvage of patients who develop vaginal recurrence and the significant risk of death from comorbidities, questions arise as to the relative merit of administering adjuvant radiation for all compared with a strategy of observation after surgery with treatment only for the 10% who have a relapse.The contribution of adjuvant radiation for high-risk disease, including those with grade III tumors with deep myometrial penetration, however, remains to be determined in ongoing trials.

Concomitant postoperative radiation and chemotherapy following surgery was associated with improved overall survival in patients with FIGO stages III and IV endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of concomitant postoperative radiation and chemotherapy in patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III and IV endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review at Shimane University and Ryukyu University, Japan, was performed of 76 patients with FIGO stages III and IV endometrial cancer. All patients had received a comprehensive staging procedure including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, ± selective pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy, surgical debulking, and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with FIGO stages III and IV endometrial cancer were identified who received postoperative adjuvant therapies; 26% (N = 20) received radiotherapy alone, 40% (N = 30) chemotherapy alone, and 34% (N = 26) chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median age was 55 years; 92% had the endometrioid type and 97% were optimally debulked. The median follow-up period was 54 (range 6-188) months. Combination therapy with chemotherapy and radiation correlated with longer overall survival compared with either chemotherapy alone (P = 0.0298) or chemotherapy alone + radiation alone (P = 0.0345). Combination therapy correlated with longer overall survival compared with radiation alone with marginal significance (P = 0.0521). No significant differences in the disease-free interval were seen among the combination therapy and chemotherapy alone or radiation alone groups.

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with radiation and chemotherapy may improve overall survival in patients with FIGO stages III and IV endometrial cancer.

Current issues in the management of endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) remains the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. It is expected to become more common as the prevalence of obesity, one of the most common risk factors for EC, increases worldwide. The 2 main histologic subcategories of EC, endometrioid and nonendometrioid EC, show unique molecular aberrations and are responsible for markedly disparate clinical behaviors. The primary treatment of EC is surgery, ie, hysterectomy, removal of the adnexa, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, either via laparotomy or endoscopic techniques. Adjuvant therapy is necessary for patients at high risk of recurrence and consists of vaginal brachytherapy, teletherapy, systemic chemotherapy, or some combination thereof. Multi-institutional trials are in progress in this country and in Europe to better define optimal adjuvant treatment for subsets of patients, as well as the role of surgical staging in reducing both overuse and underuse of radiation therapy. Hormonal therapy is an option for some young women with EC who wish to preserve fertility. This review summarizes the diagnosis and management of EC and discusses current controversies and upcoming investigations pertaining to EC staging and adjuvant treatment.

Adjuvant therapy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a review

Most patients with endometrial cancer (EMC) present their symptoms early in their course, leading to an overall favorable outcome. However, some patients who are in early-stage diseases may carry some risk features that would hamper their prognoses. For these early-stage diseases with high risk of recurrences, radiation therapy certainly plays a major role as an adjuvant treatment. Despite an excellent local diseases control by radiation, systemic failures are still encountered. To improve the prognoses, other types of adjuvant therapy have been attempted. In this review, various options of adjuvant treatment for this early-stage EMC including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy are discussed.

Endometrial cancer—Revisiting the importance of pelvic and para aortic lymph nodes

In 1998, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians) required a change from clinical to surgical staging in early endometrial cancer. This staging requirement raised numerous controversies around the importance of determining nodal status and its impact on outcomes. A diversity of opinions exists as to the actual benefits and toxicities associated with surgical staging which includes lymph node sampling, ranging from those whose opinion is that staging is required for all patients even when the a priori risk of nodal involvement is extremely low through to those who consider that staging is unnecessary in any patient. While knowledge of the presence or absence of extra uterine sites of disease may change treatment approaches and direct different treatment interventions in some patients, the impact of those changes on survival is much less clear. This paper examines recommendations for surgical staging in various subgroups of patients with clinically early endometrial cancer and the impact on survival and toxicity of the various approaches and the subsequent use of adjuvant irradiation and/or chemotherapy.

Recurrent endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrent disease and assessment of prognosis

AIM

To evaluate patterns of disease and identify factors predicting outcome in patients presenting with recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma following primary surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the imaging and clinical data in 86 patients (median age 66 years, range 42-88 years) presenting with recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma following primary surgery.

RESULTS

Following primary surgery recurrent disease occurred within 2 years in 64% and within 3 years in 87%. Relapse was seen within lymph nodes in 41 (46%), the vagina in 36 (42%) the peritoneum in 24 (28%) and the lung in 21 (24%). Unusual sites of disease included spleen, pancreas, rectum, muscle and brain. Univariate survival analysis showed the factors significant for poor outcome were: multiple sites of disease, liver and splenic disease, haematogenous, peritoneal and nodal spread, poorly differentiated tumour, and early relapse. The presence of disease within the vagina, bladder or lung was not associated with poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified multiple sites of disease, liver and splenic metastases to be independent predictors of poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

The most frequently observed sites of relapse are: lymph nodes, vagina, peritoneum and lung. Significant predictors of poor outcome in recurrent disease are multiple sites of disease and liver and splenic metastases.

Paclitaxel and concomitant radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer patients: preliminary findings

Background

There is still much debate about the best adjuvant therapy after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC) and there are no current guidelines. Radiotherapy (RT) alone does not seem to improve overall survival. We investigated whether concomitant Paclitaxel (P) and RT gave better clinical results.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with high-risk EC (stage IIB, IIIA, IIIC or IC G3 without lymphadenectomy or with aneuploid tumor) underwent primary surgery and were then referred for adjuvant therapy. P was given at a dose of 60 mg/m2 once weekly for five weeks during RT, which consisted of a total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy. Three further weekly cycles of P at a dose of 80 mg/m2 were given at the end of RT. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated from the time of surgery. Patterns of failure were recorded by the sites of failure.

Results

A total of 157 cycles of P were administered both during radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy.

Relapses occurred in five patients (21.7%). Median time to recurrence was 18.6 months (range 3–28). Survival rate for all the patients was 78.2%. Overall survival for the patients who completed chemo-radiation was of 81%. In this group median time to recurrence was 19.2 months (range 3–28). All recurrences were outside the radiation field. Mortality rate was 14.2%.

Conclusion

This small series demonstrates pelvic radiotherapy in combination with weakly P followed by three consolidation chemotherapy cycles as an effective combined approach in high risk endometrial carcinoma patients.

Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pelvic lymph node count is associated with patterns of recurrence or survival in patients with FIGO stage I and II endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Single institution retrospective study of 467 patients with FIGO stage I and II endometrial cancer treated with primary surgery including lymph node dissection. Analysis included pelvic lymph node count, histology, stage, age, race, BMI, year of surgery, depth of myometrial invasion, and adjuvant radiation. Kaplan-Meier life-tables were used to calculate survival; the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors independently associated with survival.

RESULTS

Mean pelvic lymph node count was 12.6 (SD +/- 8). Distant recurrence was associated with decreased pelvic lymph node count, high-risk histology, and postoperative pelvic radiation. Pelvic lymph node count was not associated with survival by univariate analysis, however, overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were significantly better with pelvic lymph node counts >or=12 among women with high-risk histology (P < 0.001), but not among women with low-risk histology. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified increasing age, non-Caucasian race, and high-risk histology as independent negative prognostic factors for both OS and PFI. Among patients with high-risk histology, pelvic lymph node count remained an independent prognostic factor for both overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the model, with hazard ratios of 0.28 and 0.29, respectively, when >or=12 pelvic lymph nodes were identified. Pelvic lymph node count had no association with OS or PFS in women with low-risk histology.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic lymph node count >or=12 is an important prognostic variable in patients with FIGO stage I and II endometrial cancer who have high-risk histology. Most likely, the association of survival and lymph node count in this group is the result of improved staging among patients with higher pelvic lymph node counts.

Intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized study of two dose-per-fraction levels

PURPOSE

To compare two different fractionation schedules for postoperative vaginal high-dose-rate (HDR) irradiation in endometrial carcinomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a complete geographic series of 290 low-risk endometrial carcinomas, the efficacy and side effects of two different fractionation schedules for postoperative vaginal irradiation were evaluated. The patients were treated during the years 1989-2003. The tumors were in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stages IA-IB and Grades 1-2. The HDR MicroSelectron afterloading equipment (iridium-192) was used. Perspex vaginal applicators with diameters of 20-30 mm were used, and the dose was specified at 5 mm from the surface of the applicator. Six fractions were given, and the overall treatment time was 8 days. The size of the dose per fraction was randomly set to 2.5 Gy (total dose of 15.0 Gy) or 5.0 Gy (total dose of 30.0 Gy). One hundred forty-four patients were treated with the 2.5-Gy fraction and 146 patients with the 5.0-Gy fraction.

RESULTS

The overall locoregional recurrence rate of the complete series was 1.4% and the rate of vaginal recurrences 0.7%. There was no difference between the two randomized groups. The vaginal shortening measured by colpometry was not significant (p = 0.159) in the 2.5-Gy group (mean, 0.3 cm) but was highly significant (p < 0.000001) in the 5.0-Gy group (mean 2.1 cm) after 5 years. Mucosal atrophy and bleedings were significantly more frequent in the 5.0-Gy group. Symptoms noted in the 2.5-Gy group were not different from what could be expected in a normal group of postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSION

The fractionation schedule recommended for postoperative vaginal irradiation in low-risk endometrial carcinoma is six fractions of 2.5 Gy when the HDR technique is used.

Predictors of vaginal relapse in stage I endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors predictive of vaginal relapse in stage I endometrial cancer, thereby potentially facilitating the selection of patients who may benefit from vaginal brachytherapy.

METHODS

The study population included 632 patients with stage I endometrial cancer managed with hysterectomy at our institution between 1984 and 1996. Median follow-up was 73 months; 122 patients (19%) received adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 2.9% of the stage I cohort developed vaginal relapse at 5 years. Vaginal relapse was observed in 1.7% of patients who received radiotherapy and in 3.0% of those whose treatment did not include radiotherapy (P = 0.36). Cox regression analysis (including radiotherapy) identified only grade 3 differentiation (hazard ratio = 3.83, P = 0.007) as an independent predictor of vaginal relapse. Patients with a low-grade tumor had a 5-year vaginal relapse rate of 2%, compared with 7% for those with a grade 3 tumor. When only patients who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy were considered, both grade 3 tumor and lymphovascular invasion were significant predictors of vaginal relapse (P < 0.05). When neither variable was present, 2% of patients experienced vaginal relapse at 5 years, compared with 11% when either 1 was present (P < 0.001). Depth of myometrial invasion was not a significant predictor of vaginal recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Histologic grade 3 tumor and lymphovascular invasion were the cogent predictors of vaginal relapse in our population. The cost and morbidity of vaginal brachytherapy should be balanced against the potential risk of vaginal relapse in this group of patients.

High-risk endometrial cancer subgroups: candidates for target-based adjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients with endometrial cancer at risk for hematogenous, lymphatic, or peritoneal recurrence (or combinations of them) who might potentially benefit from target-based therapies.

METHODS

During a 13-year period, 915 patients had endometrial cancer managed with hysterectomy and standard adjuvant therapy. On the basis of our previous regression analyses, depth of myometrial invasion predicted the risk for hematogenous recurrence; positive lymph nodes and cervical stromal invasion predicted lymphatic recurrence; stage IV disease or combination of nonendometrioid histology, cervical stromal invasion, positive lymph nodes, and positive peritoneal cytology was predictive of peritoneal recurrence. Median follow-up was 66 months.

RESULTS

Applying the above criteria to the population of 915 patients, 24% were considered at risk for hematogenous recurrence, 18% for lymphatic recurrence, and 16% for peritoneal recurrence. The respective relapse rates at 5 years were 28% for patients who were at risk for hematogenous recurrence, 31% for lymphatic recurrence, and 42% for peritoneal recurrence. This contrasted with less than a 5% recurrence rate in the corresponding subgroups not at risk for relapse (P < 0.001). Collectively, of the 915 patients, 324 (35%) were considered at risk for recurrence in one or more of the above three sites. Overall, 89% of all recurrences were identified in this at-risk group. Importantly, 46% of the patients considered at risk subsequently had recurrence in one or more of the three sites, compared with only 2% of patients not at risk for relapse (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients at risk for relapse had a 46% probability of experiencing recurrence within 5 years despite management with standard therapy. New target-based algorithms for the 35% of endometrial cancer patients deemed at risk should be incorporated in the development of future prospective multimodality clinical trials predicated on site(s) of recurrence.

Patterns of failure after the multimodality treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma

PURPOSE

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is an aggressive variant of endometrial carcinoma. The majority of patients with clinical Stage I UPSC are found to have extrauterine disease at the time of surgery. Most authors report survival rates of 35-50% for Stage I-II and 0-15% for Stage III and IV UPSC. Surgical treatment as the sole therapy for patients with Stage I-IV UPSC is unacceptable because of high recurrence rates. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both have been added after surgery in an attempt to improve survival. However, the survival benefit to patients from such multimodality therapy remains uncertain. This study analyzes the patterns of failure in patients with FIGO Stages I-IV UPSC treated by multimodality therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two women with FIGO Stages I-IV UPSC who were treated by multimodality therapy were analyzed retrospectively between 1988 and 1998. Data were obtained from tumor registry, hospital, and radiotherapy chart reviews, operative notes, pathology, and chemotherapy flow sheets. All the patients underwent staging laparotomy, peritoneal cytology, total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingo oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling, omentectomy, and cytoreductive surgery, when indicated followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Therapy consisted of external beam radiation therapy in 11 patients (26%), systemic chemotherapy in 20 (48%), and both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 11 (26%). The treatments were not assigned in a randomized fashion. The dose of external beam radiation therapy ranged from 45-50.40 Gy (median 45). Of the 31 patients (74%) who received chemotherapy, 18 received single-agent (58%), whereas 13 received multiagent chemotherapy (42%).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for all patients was 19 months (range 4-72). Median follow-up for the surviving patients was 36 months (range 21-72). Their median age was 65 years. Six patients (14%) had Stage I, 8 patients (19%) had Stage II, 10 (24%) had Stage III, and 18 (43%) had Stage IV disease. Twenty-nine patients (69%) had suffered recurrence at the time of last follow-up. The actuarial failure rate at 2 and 5 years was 58% and 67%, respectively. The majority of the patients (19/29) recurred in the abdomen, vagina, or pelvis (66%). Metastases outside the abdomen were much less common as the first site of failure (17%). Twenty-five patients (60%) had died at the time of reporting; the observed survival rate at 2 years and 5 years was 52% and 43%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that, after multimodality therapy of FIGO Stage I-IV UPSC, most patients developed abdominopelvic (locoregional) failure, and the great majority of the failures occurred in the abdomen, vagina, and pelvis (66%). Abdominopelvic failure as a component of distant failure occurred in an additional 5 patients (17%). Distant failure alone occurred in 17% of the patients.We propose that future studies should combine whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) with pelvic and vaginal boosts, in addition to chemotherapy for FIGO Stage I-IV UPSC, especially in patients with minimal residual disease, to attempt to improve the dismal prognosis of patients with UPSC.

Improved outcome at 10 years for serous-papillary/clear cell or high-risk endometrial cancer patients treated by adjuvant high-dose whole abdomino-pelvic irradiation

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the 10-year treatment outcome of utilizing adjuvant high-dose whole abdominal irradiation (WAPI technique) with a pelvic/vaginal boost in patients with stage I-III endometrial carcinoma at high risk for intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including serous-papillary and clear cell histologies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective nonrandomized trial, 132 patients were treated with adjuvant WAPI between November 1981 and October 2001. Forty-three patients (32%) were 1998 FIGO stage I-II and 89 (68%) were stage III. Pathological features included the following: 66 (52%) with deep myometrial invasion, 50 (38%) with positive peritoneal cytology, 89 (67%) with high-grade lesions, 25 (19%) with positive pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes, and 58 (45%) with serous-papillary or clear cell histology.

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 6.4 years (range 0.6-16.1). For the entire group, the 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS) was 77 and 72%, whereas the disease-free survival (DFS) was 55 and 45%. When stratified by histology the 5- and 10-year CSS for adenocarcinoma was 75 and 70%, while serous-papillary/clear cell was 80 and 74% (P = 0.314). The 5- and 10-year DFS for adenocarcinoma was 59 and 49%, whereas serous-papillary/clear cell was 49 and 38% (P = 0.563). For surgical stages I-II, the 5-year CSS was 83% for adenocarcinoma and 89% for serous-papillary (P = 0.353). For stage III, it was 73 and 62% (P = 0.318), respectively. Forty-six patients (35%) relapsed. The first site of failure was the abdomen/pelvis in 27/46 (59%). When stratified by histologic variant, 34% of patients with adenocarcinoma and 41% with serous-papillary developed recurrent disease. In multivariate regression analysis only advancing age was of prognostic significance for CSS (P = 0.025) and DFS (P = 0.026). Chronic grade 3/4 GI toxicity was seen in 14%, and 2% of patients developed grade 3 renal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

High-dose adjuvant WAPI is very effective treatment with excellent 10-year results for stage I-III endometrial carcinoma with risk factors for intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including serous-papillary or clear cell histology. The low long-term complication rate with high CSS makes high-dose WAPI the treatment of choice for these patients with significant comorbidities.

Ten-year outcome including patterns of failure and toxicity for adjuvant whole abdominopelvic irradiation in high-risk and poor histologic feature patients with endometrial carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term results of treatment using adjuvant whole abdominal irradiation (WAPI) with a pelvic/vaginal boost in patients with Stage I-III endometrial carcinoma at high risk of intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including clear cell (CC) and serous-papillary (SP) histologic features.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a prospective nonrandomized trial, 119 patients were treated with adjuvant WAPI between November 1981 and April 2000. All patients were analyzed, including those who did not complete therapy. The mean age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 39-88). Thirty-eight patients (32%) had 1989 FIGO Stage I-II disease and 81 (68%) had Stage III. The pathologic features included the following: 64 (54%) with deep myometrial invasion, 48 (40%) with positive peritoneal cytologic findings, 69 (58%) with high-grade lesions, 21 (18%) with positive pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes, and 44 (37%) with SP or CC histologic findings.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range 0.2-14.7). For the entire group, the 5- and 10-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate was 75% and 69% and the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 58% and 48%, respectively. When stratified by histologic features, the 5- and 10-year CSS rate for adenocarcinoma was 76% and 71%, and for serous papillary/CC subtypes, it was 74% and 63%, respectively (p = 0.917). The 5- and 10-year DFS rate for adenocarcinoma was 60% and 50% and was 54% and 37% serous papillary/CC subtypes, respectively (p = 0.498). For surgical Stage I-II, the 5-year CSS rate was 82% for adenocarcinoma and 87% for SP/CC features (p = 0.480). For Stage III, it was 75% and 57%, respectively (p = 0.129). Thirty-seven patients had a relapse, with the first site of failure the abdomen/pelvis in 14 (38%), lung in 8 (22%), extraabdominal lymph nodes in 7 (19%), vagina in 6 (16%), and other in 2 (5%). When stratified by histologic variant, 32% of patients with adenocarcinoma and 30% with the SP/CC subtype developed recurrent disease. Most failures for either histologic group occurred within the abdominopelvic region. However, one-third of the adenocarcinoma recurrences were in the lung. Multivariate regression analysis (age, surgical stage, grade, myometrial invasion, histologic type, lymph node status, and peritoneal cytology) demonstrated age (p = 0.019) and surgical stage (p = 0.036) to be of prognostic significance for CSS; age (p = 0.036) was the only significant prognostic factor for DFS. Grade 1-2 gastrointestinal and hematologic acute toxicities were common. Asymptomatic bibasilar scarring on chest X-ray and mild elevation of liver enzymes were seen in almost 50% of the patients. Even though chronic toxicities were less frequent, 12% developed Grade 3-4 gastrointestinal and 2% Grade 3 renal toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant WAPI is very effective treatment with excellent 10-year results for Stage I-III endometrial carcinoma with risk factors for intra-abdominopelvic recurrence, including SP or CC histologic variants, deep myometrial invasion, high grade, nodal involvement, and positive peritoneal cytology. The low long-term complication rate with high CSS rate makes WAPI the treatment of choice for these patients with significant comorbidities.

Surgical chores and approach in the management of endometrial cancer

Carcinoma of the uterine corpus is the most common malignancy in the female pelvis. Surgical resection and staging are now the accepted approach to therapy, with excellent survival compared with other gynecologic malignancies. Several controversies exist, however, regarding optimal surgical management. Some of these controversies are addressed in this article, with a review of their recent and historic literature.

The significance of the amount of myometrial invasion in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The 1988 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial carcinoma defined Stage IB as disease with invasion of less than one-half of the myometrium, although most of the data on prognostic factors are based on invasion of the inner one-third, middle one-third, or outer one-third of the myometrium. The objective of this study was to determine whether the depth of myometrial invasion is correlated with outcome in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

Between November, 1987 and June, 1998, 251 patients with Stage IB endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus underwent simple hysterectomy followed by intravaginal brachytherapy. The depth of myometrial invasion was less than or equal to one-third (Group I) in 191 of 251 patients (79%) and greater than one-third to less than one-half (Group II) in 52 of 251 patients (21%). Comprehensive surgical staging (CSS) was done in 12% of patients. The two groups were balanced with regard to age (< 60 years vs. > or = 60 years), FIGO grade, lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI), CSS, and the use of postoperative external-beam radiation. The rate of capillary-like space invasion (CLSI), however, was 9% in Group I compared with 25% in Group II (P = 0.002). The median follow-up was 58 months.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year actuarial local-regional control (LRC), disease free (DFS) survival, and overall survival (OS) rates were 95%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. These end points, however, did not vary significantly between the two groups. The 5-year LRC, DFS, and OS rates in Groups I and II were 96% versus 95%, respectively (P = 0.9); 92% versus 94%, respectively (P = 0.7); and 92% versus 90%, respectively (P = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, the influence on outcome of age, grade, amount of myometrial invasion, LUSI, and CLSI was evaluated. Only age > or = 60 years and FIGO Grade 3 were correlated with poor DFS (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively) and OS (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma, the amount of myometrial invasion, defined as invasion less than or equal to one-third of the myometrium versus invasion greater than one-third and less than one-half of the myometrium, did not appear to influence outcome. Age > or = 60 years and FIGO Grade 3, however, emerged as independent prognostic factors for poor DFS and OS.

Postoperative intravaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the dosimetric differences between colpostats and cylinder applicators for intravaginal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Dose distributions near vaginal colpostats and dome cylinders were computed with a commercial high-dose-rate treatment-planning system and verified by spot measurements by using LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters. Taking source anisotropy into account, dwell times were optimized by the computer by using the polynomial optimization on dose points method to give uniform doses along the lateral surfaces of the applicators. In addition, the effects of vaginal packing and the separation distance between colpostats were studied by computing the dose to the vaginal mucosa, assuming 0.5 and 1.0 cm of vaginal packing and colpostat separation, respectively.

RESULTS

The computed and measured doses agreed within +/- 7%. Surface doses were similar for both types of applicators when the effect of shielding in the colpostats was neglected. However, percent depth doses in the anterior/posterior and lateral directions were higher for the cylinder, whereas the dose fall-off along the longitudinal patient axis was less pronounced for the colpostats. When vaginal packing at the anterior and posterior surface of the colpostats was increased from 0 to 5, 10, and 15 mm, the corresponding vaginal dose decreased from 97% of the prescription dose to 60%, 39%, and 26%, respectively. Separating the colpostats from 0 to 5 and 10 mm reduced the surface dose near the bladder/rectum to 80% and 67%, respectively, whereas the respective apex dose decreased from 105% of prescription to 91% and 77%.

CONCLUSIONS

Colpostats and cylinder applicators for intracavitary brachytherapy have their advantages and disadvantages in depth dose distribution and clinical use. If treatment is confined to the vaginal apex, either applicator can be used. However, the colpostat separation should be kept to a minimum, and vaginal packing should be applied with great care to avoid generating cold spots along the upper vaginal surface and vaginal cuff.

Early-stage endometrial cancer

For half a century, adjuvant radiation therapy has been an important component in the treatment of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer believed to be at significant risk of local or regional recurrence. The widespread adoption of up-front surgical treatment and staging, including nodal assessment, has raised new questions about the need for and extent of postoperative adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, in some institutions, even in the absence of complete surgical staging, the extent of postoperative adjuvant treatment is being reassessed. These developments have increased interest in the use of intravaginal brachytherapy (IVRT) alone in selected patients whose major risk of recurrence is at the vaginal cuff. The potential advantages of this approach include lower cost and decreased acute and late toxicity. The use of IVRT alone in select patients was examined through a review of the available literature. The authors conclude that there is a subset of patients in whom adjuvant treatment with IVRT alone is adequate. A clinical approach involving patient selection criteria is proposed which suggests separate selection criteria based on whether or not complete surgical staging information is available.

Gynecologic brachytherapy-II: Intravaginal brachytherapy for carcinoma of the endometrium

Brachytherapy plays a significant role in the management of endometrial cancer. In the adjuvant setting, based on pathologic risk factors, intravaginal brachytherapy alone, external radiation therapy alone, or a combination of the two is recommended. For patients who are medically inoperable, brachytherapy with or without external beam therapy is the mainstay of treatment. In recurrent disease, to achieve improved local regional control interstitial and/or intravaginal brachytherapy is used as a boost. This article will highlight the indications and technical aspects of postoperative intravaginal brachytherapy, which is the most common application of brachytherapy in endometrial cancer.

Potential benefit of lymphadenectomy for the treatment of node-negative locally advanced uterine cancers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes in patients with high-risk Stage I endometrial cancers surgically staged by complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, with negative nodes, and treated with postoperative brachytherapy.

METHODS

From the database of patients treated for Stage I endometrial cancer, 23 patients were identified with either >50% myometrial invasion or grade 3 histology treated with total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. All patients had no pathologic evidence of disease in the lymph nodes. These patients were then treated with brachytherapy and followed for treatment and cost outcomes. A comparison was made of the cost of treatment between brachytherapy and external beam radiation.

RESULTS

All 23 patients with either grade 3 tumor or greater than 50% myometrial invasion were treated with total abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy followed by brachytherapy for lesions that did not extend outside the uterine specimen. For all patients in this series, there were no recurrences in the follow-up period (median 25 months). This regimen is more cost efficient and spares the patient from possible complications related to whole pelvic radiation, at an average cost savings of $4100.

CONCLUSION

Women undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial adenocarcinoma with high-risk node-negative disease confined to the uterus can be safely treated with brachytherapy, at a substantial cost savings, without compromising survival.

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium treated with combined irradiation and surgery: study of 437 patients

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors and treatment toxicity in a series of operable endometrial adenocarcinomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1971 and October 1992, 437 patients (pts) with endometrial carcinoma, staged according to the 1988 FIGO staging system (225 Stage IB, 107 Stage IC, 4 Stage IIA, 35 Stage IIB, 30 Stage IIIA, 6 Stage IIIB, and 30 Stage IIIC), underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without (n = 140) or with (n = 297) pelvic lymph node dissection. The chronology of adjuvant RT was not randomized and depended on the usual practices of the surgical teams. Seventy-nine pts (Group I) received preoperative low-dose-rate uterovaginal brachytherapy (mean dose [MD]: 57 Gy). Three hundred fifty-eight pts (Group II) received postoperative RT. One hundred ninety-six pts received low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy alone (MD: 50 Gy). One hundred fifty-eight pts had external beam pelvic RT (MD: 46 Gy) followed by low-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy (MD: 17 Gy). Four pts had external beam pelvic RT alone (MD: 47 Gy). The mean follow-up from the beginning of treatment was 128 months.

RESULTS

The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 86%. From 57 recurrences, only 12 were isolated locoregional recurrences. The independent factors decreasing the probability of disease-free survival were as follows: histologic type (clear-cell carcinoma, p = 0.038), largest histologic tumor diameter >3 cm (p = 0.015), histologic grade (p = 0.008), myometrial invasion > 1/2 (p = 0.005), and 1988 FIGO staging system (p = 9.10(-8)). In Group II, the addition of external beam pelvic RT did not seem to independently improve vaginal or pelvic control. The postoperative complication rate was 7%. The independent factors increasing the risk of postoperative complications were stage FIGO (p = 0.02) and pelvic lymph node dissection (p = 0.011). The 10-year rate for Grade 3 and 4 late radiation complications according to the LENT-SOMA scoring system was 3.1%. External beam pelvic RT independently increased the rate for Grade 3 and 4 late complication (RR: 5.6, p = 0.0096).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative external beam pelvic RT increases the risk of late radiation complications. After surgical and histopathologic staging with pelvic lymph node dissection, in subgroup of "intermediate-risk" patients (Stage IA Grade 3, IB-C and II), postoperative vaginal brachytherapy alone is probably sufficient to obtain a good therapeutic index. Results for patients with Stage III tumor are not satisfactory.

Postoperative irradiation in endometrial cancer: still a matter of controversy

Although endometrial cancer is the most common female malignancy, evidence-based uniform guidelines for postoperative therapy have not been established. The most logical management is adjuvant irradiation tailored to the extent of surgery, the tumour grade, depth of myometrial invasion, degree of lymph node involvement and age of the patient. Currently, the only widely accepted treatment recommendations are no further therapy in low-risk patients who underwent extensive surgical staging, and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in high-risk patients. Most authors recommend postoperative application of only one radiotherapy modality: either brachytherapy (BRT) or EBRT, as their routine combination does not clearly improve the outcome but does increase the risk of late complications. A combination of BRT and EBRT should however be considered in patients with stage II disease, for infiltration of the lower uterine segment, vaginal involvement, positive or close surgical margins, capillary space involvement or unfavourable histology. Two recent randomized studies including mostly intermediate-risk patients managed with either extensive surgical staging or total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH&BSO) with or without postoperative EBRT, showed better local control but no survival benefit from adjuvant irradiation. Two ongoing Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) studies compare adjuvant chemotherapy with pelvic or abdominal irradiation in patients with high risk of local relapse. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (EBRT with or without BRT) in high-risk patients as well as the value of lymphadenectomy in patients fit for such surgery is being addressed in a trial co-ordinated by the Medical Research Council. Future studies are warranted to define whether any irradiation should be employed in intermediate-risk patients and which radiotherapy modality should be used in high-risk node-negative patients with stage I tumours (stage Ib grade 3 and all stage Ic). Other issues which should be addressed in future studies include the extent of surgery, the role of systemic therapies, the relevance of novel biologic prognostic factors, salvage therapies after recurrence, cost-benefit analysis and quality of life.

Local recurrence in high-risk node-negative stage I endometrial carcinoma treated with postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to examine the patterns of failure after extended surgical staging and postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy as the only adjuvant treatment in high-risk surgical Stage I patients with endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

The records of all patients with endometrial carcinoma (adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous) receiving vaginal vault brachytherapy as the only adjuvant treatment from January 1989 to December 1997 were examined. A total of 489 patients were found. Of these, 133 had extended surgical staging. The study group consists of 77 surgical Stage I patients with Substages IBG3 and any grade IC. Recurrences were recorded as in the vagina, pelvis, or distant.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up interval was 45 months (range 14 to 96 months). Eleven patients had recurrence (14%). Median time to recurrence was 15 months (range 6 to 56 months). Recurrences occurred in the vagina in 7, pelvis in 1, and distantly in 3 patients. Five of 7 vaginal recurrences occurred within 2 years. All patients with distant recurrence died from disease. One patient with pelvic recurrence is alive with disease. Only 1 patient with vaginal recurrence died from disease. Six patients with isolated recurrences in the vagina were successfully treated with radiotherapy with or without local excision. All 6 have no evidence of disease at follow-up (median survival 29 months, range 20 to 71 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The vagina remains the most common site of recurrence for high-risk surgical Stage I patients treated with postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy. Close follow-up in the first 2 years is essential to detect isolated vaginal recurrences. These are amenable to salvage treatment with good disease-free survival.

Treatment of high-risk uterine cancer with whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment outcomes in patients with optimally debulked Stage III and IV endometrial adenocarcinoma (ACA) or Stages I-IV uterine papillary serous (UPSC) or clear cell (CCC) carcinoma of the uterus, treated postoperatively with whole abdominopelvic irradiation (WAPI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1998, 48 patients received postoperative WAPI at our institution. Twenty-two patients had FIGO Stage III or Stage IV ACA and 26 patients had FIGO Stages I-IV UPSC or CCC. The median dose was 30 Gy to the upper abdomen and 49.8 Gy to the pelvis. Mean follow-up was 37 months (2.4-135 months).

RESULTS

The 3-year estimated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for the entire group were 60% and 77%, respectively. Patients with ACA had 3-year DFS and OS of 79% and 89%, respectively, compared with 47% and 68% in the UPSC/CCC group. Early-stage patients (I and II) with UPSC/CCC had 3-year DFS and OS of 87% compared with 32% and 61% in those with advanced (Stage III and IV) disease. The 3-year actuarial major complication rate was 7%, with no treatment-related deaths. All 4 failures in the ACA group were extra-abdominal and 6 of the 11 in the UPSC/CCC group had an extra-abdominal component. Age and UPSC/CCC histology were significant prognostic factors for DFS and OS. In addition, stage and number of extrauterine sites of disease were significant predictors for DFS in UPSC/CCC.

CONCLUSION

WAPI is a safe, effective treatment for patients with optimally debulked advanced-stage uterine ACA or early-stage UPSC/CCC. Survival was significantly worse in advanced-stage UPSC/CCC patients. We recommend future trials of WAPI with concurrent, or subsequent systemic therapy in patients with advanced-stage UPSC or CCC.

Recurrent endometrial cancer after surgery alone: results of salvage radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Postoperative irradiation of endometrial cancer patients decreases the risk of local recurrence but is associated with a number of long-term sequelae. In a proportion of patients, no immediate postoperative radiotherapy is applied and this treatment is introduced only at relapse. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term results of salvage radiotherapy in previously nonirradiated endometrial cancer patients who developed local recurrence, and to evaluate the impact of patient- and treatment-related factors on treatment efficacy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a detailed retrospective analysis of 73 endometrial cancer patients given radiotherapy for local recurrence after the initial surgery only. The mean age at diagnosis of the recurrence was 63 years (range, 39-78 years). Median time to recurrence was 11 months (range, 1-19 months). All recurrences were staged with the use of Perez modification of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for primary vaginal carcinoma. There were five (7%) Stage I patients, 43 (59%) Stage II patients, and 25 (34%) Stage III patients. Forty-four patients (60%) received both external beam irradiation (EBRT) and endovaginal brachytherapy (BRT), 17 (23%) received only BRT, and 12 (17%) received only EBRT. The mean total physical radiation dose was 75.9 Gy (range, 8-130 Gy), and the mean normalized total dose (NTD) calculated on the base of the linear-quadratic model was 86.6 Gy (range, 8.5-171.9 Gy). Median follow-up for alive patients was 8.8 years (range, 3-21 years). The impact of patient-, tumor-, and therapy-related factors on the treatment outcome was evaluated with the use of uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Three- and 5-year overall survival rates were 33% and 25%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, lower stage of recurrent disease (p < 0.0005), combined EBRT and BRT (p = 0.027), higher total radiation dose (p = 0.031), and higher NTD (p = 0.006) were significantly correlated with better survival. In the multivariate analysis, only stage of recurrent disease (p < 0.005) and high total dose (p = 0.047) were independently correlated with better survival. Lower FIGO stage of recurrence (p = 0.023) and higher total dose (p = 0.005) were also independently correlated with longer time to progression, whereas higher radiotherapy dose was the only factor correlated with better local control (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of salvage radiotherapy in endometrial cancer patients with local failure after previous surgery is limited. Factors determining treatment outcome include advancement of the tumor at relapse and radiotherapy dose.

Post-operative high dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low to intermediate risk endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This paper investigates the outcome using different dose/fractionation schedules in high dose rate (HDR) post-operative vaginal vault radiotherapy in patients with low to intermediate risk endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The world literature was reviewed and thirteen series were analyzed representing 1800 cases.

RESULTS

A total of 12 vaginal vault recurrences were identified representing an overall vaginal control rate of 99.3%. A wide range of dose fractionation schedules and techniques have been reported. In order to analyze a dose response relationship for tumor control and complications, the biologically effective doses to the tumor and late responding tissues were calculated using the linear quadratic model. A threshold was identified for complications, but not vaginal control. While dose fractionation schedules that delivered a biologically effective dose to the late responding tissues in excess of 100 Gy(3) (LQED=60 Gy) predicted for late complications, dose fractionation schedules that delivered a modest dose to the vaginal surface (50 Gy(10) or LQED=30 Gy) appeared tumoricidal with vaginal control rates of at least 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

By using convenient, modest dose fractionation schedules, HDR vaginal vault - brachytherapy yields very high local control and extremely low morbidity rates.

Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to find readily ascertainable intraoperative pathologic indicators that would discriminate a subgroup of early corpus cancers that would not require lymphadenectomy or adjuvant radiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 1984 and 1993, a total of 328 patients with endometrioid corpus cancer, grade 1 or 2 tumor, myometrial invasion < or =50%, and no intraoperative evidence of macroscopic extrauterine spread were treated surgically. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 187 cases (57%), and nodes were positive in nine cases (5%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 65 patients (20%). Median follow-up was 88 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall cancer-related and recurrence-free survivals were 97% and 96%, respectively. Primary tumor diameter and lymphatic or vascular invasion significantly affected longevity. No patient with tumor diameter < or =2 cm had positive lymph nodes or died of disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 1 or 2 endometrioid corpus cancer with greatest surface dimension < or =2 cm, myometrial invasion < or =50%, and no intraoperative evidence of macroscopic disease can be treated optimally with hysterectomy only.