TP53 protein expression analysis by luminometric immunoassay in comparison with gene mutation status and prognostic factors in early stage endometrial cancer

Predictive and prognostic factors in definition of risk groups in endometrial carcinoma

Background. The aim was to evaluate predictive and prognostic factors in a large consecutive series of endometrial carcinomas and to discuss pre- and postoperative risk groups based on these factors. Material and Methods. In a consecutive series of 4,543 endometrial carcinomas predictive and prognostic factors were analyzed with regard to recurrence rate and survival. The patients were treated with primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Two preoperative and three postoperative risk groups were defined. DNA ploidy was included in the definitions. Eight predictive or prognostic factors were used in multivariate analyses. Results. The overall recurrence rate of the complete series was 11.4%. Median time to relapse was 19.7 months. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, FIGO grade, myometrial infiltration, and DNA ploidy were independent and statistically predictive factors with regard to recurrence rate. The 5-year overall survival rate was 73%. Tumor stage was the single most important factor with FIGO grade on the second place. DNA ploidy was also a significant prognostic factor. In the preoperative risk group definitions three factors were used: histology, FIGO grade, and DNA ploidy. Conclusions. DNA ploidy was an important and significant predictive and prognostic factor and should be used both in preoperative and postoperative risk group definitions.

p53 is correlated with low BMI negative progesterone receptor status and recurring disease in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

P53 tumor suppressor gene plays a role in endometrial carcinogenesis. Former studies described correlations between p53 protein overexpression in endometrial cancer and prognostic factors, measured by immunohistochemistry. But data is still controversial. The aim of this study was to measure p53 and phospho-p53 overexpression by Western blot and evaluate correlations between overexpression and prognostic and clinical factors. Phospho-p53 seems to be the functional p53 protein and was examined for the first time in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

40 patients with endometrial cancer were included in the study. A control group of 20 patients with normal endometrial tissue samples was used. Western blot was performed for detection of p53 and phospho-p53. Clinical and pathological parameters were obtained from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test, the Mann-Whitney test for two independent groups and the Fisher's exact test for dichotomous groupings.

RESULTS

In 17.5% of the patients with endometrial cancer a p53 overexpression could be evaluated. There was a correlation between a p53 overexpression and recurring disease (p: 0.014), a negative progesterone receptor status (p: 0.021) and a low BMI (p: 0.022). Only one of 40 patients had a phospho-p53 expression.

CONCLUSION

Western blot is a valid method for the detection of p53 overexpression. As other authors described before, p53 overexpression seems to correlate with negative prognostic factors. The correlation between p53 overexpression and a low BMI may underline the relationship between p53 alterations and biological aggressive endometrial carcinomas.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of cathepsin D in normal, hyperplastic and malignant endometrium: correlation with hormone receptor status c-erbB-2, p53, Rb proteins and proliferation associated indices

The immunohistochemical expression of cathepsin D was performed in paraffin embedded tissue from 79 endometrial carcinomas, 35 cases of hyperplasia, and 32 normal endometrium using the streptavidin-biotin method to investigate the role of cathepsin D (CD) in these lesions and its possible relationship with other potential and established prognostic markers. The association between CD and the other markers was assessed by univariate analysis. Tumor cell CD expression was lower in the group of carcinomas compared to the normal proliferative (P = 0.022) and secretory endometrium (P = 0.0005). In addition, hyperplastic cell CD expression was lower compared with epithelial cell CD expression in the secretory phase of normal endometrium (P = 0.009). Malignant cell CD expression was inversely correlated with tumor stromal cells (P = 0.007). A positive relationship of stromal cell CD expression with pRb (P = 0.046) and PCNA score (P < 0.0001) was detected in the group of carcinomas. In the proliferative phase of normal endometrium, epithelial CD expression was positively correlated with estrogen status (P = 0.015). The data show that down-regulation of CD expression is an early event in endometrial carcinogenesis. In addition, stromal cell CD expression may be involved in cell growth process in endometrial carcinomas.

Biomarkers in diagnostic obstetric and gynecologic pathology: a review

Until recently, the histologic diagnosis of obstetrical and gynecologic neoplasia was based principally on morphologic criteria. However, interobserver reproducibility for entities such as squamous intraepithelial, endometrial, and trophoblastic disease varies widely between observers. This inherent variability in interpretation between individuals has led to wide ranges in diagnostic precision between practices, and in many cases, between recognized experts. The advent of immunohistochemistry, and the more recent accelerated discovery of new genes and their functions has resulted in the discovery of cellular proteins or nucleic acids that are differentially expressed in tumors. When applied in conjunction with existing histologic criteria, these "biomarkers" have the potential to enhance diagnostic consistency and reproducibility. The gains expected are to practicing diagnostic pathologists (who will enjoy greater diagnostic consistency) and to academics (for whom biomarkers may uncover new pathways unappreciated by histologic diagnosis alone). However, fundamental to the success in both arenas will be critical analysis of the potential pitfalls in immunohistochemistry, strict validation of new markers as they arrive in the field, and a realistic view of their value in the laboratory management of obstetrical and gynecologic diseases.