Substitution of acetic acid for hydrochloric acid in the bicarbonate buffered dialysate

Impact of Acetate versus Citrate Dialysates on Intermediary Metabolism-A Targeted Metabolomics Approach

Acetate is widely used as a dialysate buffer to avoid the precipitation of bicarbonate salts. However, even at low concentrations that wouldn’t surpass the metabolic capacity of the Krebs tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, other metabolic routes are activated, leading to undesirable clinical consequences by poorly understood mechanisms. This study aims to add information that could biologically explain the clinical improvements found in patients using citrate dialysate. A unicentric, cross-over, prospective targeted metabolomics study was designed to analyze the differences between two dialysates, one containing 4 mmol/L of acetate (AD) and the other 1 mmol/L of citrate (CD). Fifteen metabolites were studied to investigate changes induced in the TCA cycle, glycolysis, anaerobic metabolism, ketone bodies, and triglyceride and aminoacidic metabolism. Twenty-one patients completed the study. Citrate increased during the dialysis sessions when CD was used, without surpassing normal values. Other differences found in the next TCA cycle steps showed an increased substrate accumulation when using AD. While lactate decreased, pyruvate remained stable, and ketogenesis was boosted during dialysis. Acetylcarnitine and myo-inositol were reduced during dialysis, while glycerol remained constant. Lastly, glutamate and glutarate decreased due to the inhibition of amino acidic degradation. This study raises new hypotheses that need further investigation to understand better the biochemical processes that dialysis and the different dialysate buffers induce in the patient’s metabolism.

Citric Acid-Containing Dialysate and Survival Rate in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study

Background

Metabolic acidosis is a common threat for patients on hemodialysis, managed by alkaline dialysate. The main base is bicarbonate, to which small amounts of acetic, citric, or hydrochloric acid are added. The first two are metabolized to bicarbonate, mostly by the liver. Citric acid-containing dialysate might improve dialysis efficiency, anticoagulation, calcification propensity score, and intradialytic hemodynamic stability. However, a recent report from the French dialysis registry suggested this dialysate increases mortality risk. This prompted us to assess whether citric acid-containing bicarbonate-based dialysate was associated with mortality in the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

Methods

Detailed patient-based information on dialysate composition was collected in DOPPS phases 5 and 6 (2012-2017). Cox regression was used to model the association between baseline bicarbonate dialysate containing citric acid versus not containing citric acid and mortality among DOPPS countries and phases where citric acid-containing dialysate was used.

Results

Citric acid-containing dialysate was most commonly used in Japan, Italy, and Belgium (25%, 25%, 21% and of patients who were DOPPS phase 6, respectively) and used in <10% of patients in other countries. Among 11,306 patients in DOPPS country and phases with at least 15 patients using citric acid-containing dialysate, patient demographics, comorbidities, and laboratories were similar among patients using (14%) versus not using (86%) citric acid-containing dialysate. After accounting for case mix, we did not observe a directional association between citric acid-containing dialysate use (any versus none) and mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.34), nor did we find evidence of a dose-dependent relationship when parameterizing the citric acid concentration in the dialysate as 1, 2, and 3+ mEq/L.

Conclusions

The use of citric acid-containing dialysate was not associated with greater risk of all-cause mortality in patients on hemodialysis participating in DOPPS. Clinical indications for the use of citric acid-containing dialysate deserve further investigation.

Acetate-free, citrate-acidified bicarbonate dialysis improves serum calcification propensity-a preliminary study

Background

A novel in vitro test (T50 test) assesses ex vivo serum calcification propensity and predicts mortality in chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis (HD) patients. For the latter, a time-dependent decline of T50 was shown to relate to mortality. Here we assessed whether a 3-month switch to acetate-free, citrate-acidified, standard bicarbonate HD (CiaHD) sustainably improves calcification propensity.

Methods

T50 values were assessed in paired midweek pre-dialysis sera collected before and 3 months after CiaHD in 78 prevalent European HD patients. In all, 44 were then switched back to acetate. Partial correlation was used to study associations of changing T50 and changing covariates. Linear mixed effect models were built to assess the association of CiaHD and covariates with changing T50.

Results

A significant intra-individual increase of serum calcification resilience was found after 3 months on CiaHD (206  ±  56 to 242  ±  56 min; P < 0.001), but not after switching back to acetate (252  ±  63 to 243  ±  64 min; n = 44; P = 0.29). CiaHD, Δ serum phosphate and Δ albumin but not Δ ionized calcium and magnesium were the strongest determinants of changing T50. Beneath T50, only serum albumin but not phosphate changed significantly during 3 months of CiaHD.

Conclusion

CiaHD dialysis favourably affected calcification propensity as measured by the T50 test. Whether this treatment, beyond established phosphate-directed treatments, has the potential to sustainably tip the balance towards a more anti-calcific serum milieu needs to be further investigated.

The dynamics of the metabolism of acetate and bicarbonate associated with use of hemodialysates in the ABChD trial: a phase IV, prospective, single center, single blind, randomized, cross-over, two week investigation

Background

In the United States, hemodialysis (HD) is generally performed via a bicarbonate dialysate. It is not known if small amounts of acid used in dialysate to buffer the bicarbonate can meaningfully contribute to overall buffering administered during HD. We aimed to investigate the metabolism of acetate with use of two different acid buffer concentrates and determine if it effects blood bicarbonate concentrations in HD patients.

Methods

The Acid-Base Composition with use of hemoDialysates (ABChD) trial was a Phase IV, prospective, single blind, randomized, cross-over, 2 week investigation of peridialytic dynamics of acetate and bicarbonate associated with use of acid buffer concentrates. Eleven prevalent HD patients participated from November 2014 to February 2015. Patients received two HD treatments, with NaturaLyte® and GranuFlo® acid concentrates containing 4 and 8 mEq/L of acetate, respectively. Dialysate order was chosen in a random fashion. The endpoint was to characterize the dynamics of acetate received and metabolized during hemodialysis, and how it effects overall bicarbonate concentrations in the blood and dialysate. Acetate and bicarbonate concentrations were assessed before, at 8 time points during, and 6 time points after the completion of HD.

Results

Data from 20 HD treatments for 11 patients (10 NaturaLyte® and 10 GranuFlo®) was analyzed. Cumulative trajectories of arterialized acetate were unique between NaturaLyte® and GranuFlo® (p = 0.003), yet individual time points demonstrated overlap without remarkable differences. Arterialized and venous blood bicarbonate concentrations were similar at HD initiation, but by 240 min into dialysis, mean arterialized bicarbonate concentrations were 30.2 (SD ± 4.16) mEq/L in GranuFlo® and 28.8 (SD ± 4.26) mEq/L in NaturaLyte®. Regardless of acid buffer concentrate, arterial blood bicarbonate was primarily dictated by the prescribed bicarbonate level. Subjects tolerated HD with both acid buffer concentrates without experiencing any related adverse events.

Conclusions

A small fraction of acetate was delivered to HD patients with use of NaturaLyte® and GranuFlo® acid buffers; the majority of acetate received was observed to be rapidly metabolized and cleared from the circulation. Blood bicarbonate concentrations appear to be determined mainly by the prescribed concentration of bicarbonate.

Trial registration

This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 11 Dec 2014 (NCT02334267).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0683-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Three-Stream, Bicarbonate-Based Hemodialysis Solution Delivery System Revisited: With an Emphasis on Some Aspects of Acid-Base Principles

Hemodialysis patients can acquire buffer base (i.e., bicarbonate and buffer base equivalents of certain organic anions) from the acid and base concentrates of a three-stream, dual-concentrate, bicarbonate-based, dialysis solution delivery machine. The differences between dialysis fluid concentrate systems containing acetic acid versus sodium diacetate in the amount of potential buffering power were reviewed. Any organic anion such as acetate, citrate, or lactate (unless when combined with hydrogen) delivered to the body has the potential of being converted to bicarbonate. The prescribing physician aware of the role that organic anions in the concentrates can play in providing buffering power to the final dialysis fluid, will have a better knowledge of the amount of bicarbonate and bicarbonate precursors delivered to the patient.

Hypersensitivity reactions to acetate in the bicarbonate dialysate in a patient undergoing pre-dilution online hemodiafiltration

A 63-year-old male patient first experienced recurrent hypotensive episode during the dialysis session just after switching the mode from hemodialysis to online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) with infusion in pre-dilution of the bicarbonate dialysate containing 9.2 mEq/L of acetate. Peripheral eosinophil count and serum IgE were both elevated to 16,440/μL and 2000 IU/L. The reactions promptly dissolved with substitution of acetate-free solution. This case illustrated that pre-dilution OL-HDF can induce an occult hypersensitivity to acetate in the standard bicarbonate dialysate.

Bicarbonate Balance and Prescription in ESRD

The optimal approach to managing acid-base balance is less well defined for patients receiving hemodialysis than for those receiving peritoneal dialysis. Interventional studies in hemodialysis have been limited and inconsistent in their findings, whereas more compelling data are available from interventional studies in peritoneal dialysis. Both high and low serum bicarbonate levels associate with an increased risk of mortality in patients receiving hemodialysis, but high values are a marker for poor nutrition and comorbidity and are often highly variable from month to month. Measurement of pH would likely provide useful additional data. Concern has arisen regarding high-bicarbonate dialysate and dialysis-induced alkalemia, but whether these truly cause harm remains to be determined. The available evidence is insufficient for determining the optimal target for therapy at this time.

Plasma-Lyte 148: A clinical review

AIM

To outline the physiochemical properties and specific clinical uses of Plasma-Lyte 148 as choice of solution for fluid intervention in critical illness, surgery and perioperative medicine.

METHODS

We performed an electronic literature search from Medline and PubMed (via Ovid), anesthesia and pharmacology textbooks, and online sources including studies that compared Plasma-Lyte 148 to other crystalloid solutions. The following keywords were used: “surgery”, “anaesthesia”, “anesthesia”, “anesthesiology”, “anaesthesiology”, “fluids”, “fluid therapy”, “crystalloid”, “saline”, “plasma-Lyte”, “plasmalyte”, “hartmann’s”, “ringers”“acetate”, “gluconate”, “malate”, “lactate”. All relevant articles were accessed in full. We summarized the data and reported the data in tables and text.

RESULTS

We retrieved 104 articles relevant to the choice of Plasma-Lyte 148 for fluid intervention in critical illness, surgery and perioperative medicine. We analyzed the data and reported the results in tables and text.

CONCLUSION

Plasma-Lyte 148 is an isotonic, buffered intravenous crystalloid solution with a physiochemical composition that closely reflects human plasma. Emerging data supports the use of buffered crystalloid solutions in preference to saline in improving physicochemical outcomes. Further large randomized controlled trials assessing the comparative effectiveness of Plasma-Lyte 148 and other crystalloid solutions in measuring clinically important outcomes such as morbidity and mortality are needed.

Acute effect of citrate bath on postdialysis alkalaemia

INTRODUCTION

The correction of metabolic acidosis caused by renal failure is achieved by adding bicarbonate during dialysis. In order to avoid the precipitation of calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate that takes place in the dialysis fluid (DF) when adding bicarbonate, it is necessary to add an acid, usually acetate, which is not free of side effects. Thus, citrate appears as an advantageous alternative to acetate, despite the fact that its acute effects are not accurately known.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the acute effect of a dialysis fluid containing citrate instead of acetate on acid-base balance and calcium-phosphorus metabolism parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective crossover study was conducted with twenty-four patients (15 male subjects and 9 female subjects). All patients underwent dialysis with AK-200-Ultra-S monitor with SoftPac® dialysis fluid, made with 3 mmol/L of acetate and SelectBag Citrate®, with 1 mmol/L of citrate and free of acetate. The following were measured before and after dialysis: venous blood gas monitoring, calcium (Ca), ionic calcium (Cai), phosphorus (P) and parathyroid hormone (PTH).

RESULTS

Differences (p<0.05) were found when using the citrate bath (C) compared to acetate (A) in the postdialysis values of: pH, C: 7.43 (0.04) vs. A: 7.47 (0.05); bicarbonate, C: 24.7 (2.7) vs. A: 27.3 (2.1) mmol/L; base excess (BEecf), C: 0.4 (3.1) vs. A: 3.7 (2.4) mmol/L; corrected calcium (Cac), C: 9.8 (0.8) vs. A: 10.1 (0.7) mg/dL; and Cai, C: 1.16 (0.05) vs. A: 1.27 (0.06) mmol/L. No differences were found in either of the parameters measured before dialysis.

CONCLUSION

Dialysis with citrate provides better control of postdialysis acid-base balance, decreases/avoids postdialysis alkalaemia, and lowers the increase in Cac and Cai. This finding is of special interest in patients with predisposing factors for arrhythmia and patients with respiratory failure, carbon dioxide retention, calcifications and advanced liver disease.

Acute intradialytic cardiac function and inflammatory cytokine changes during high-efficiency online hemodiafiltration with acetate-free and standard dialysis solutions

Acetate in standard acetate-containing bicarbonate (AC) dialysis fluid could induce peripheral vasodilatation, suppression of myocardial function, and inflammatory cytokine production, resulting in intradialytic hypotension in conventional hemodialysis (HD) patients. Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) provides superior hemodynamic stability over HD. The potentially additive hemodynamic benefits of the novel acetate-free bicarbonate (AF) dialysis fluid in online HDF have never been explored before. The present randomized, double-blind, crossover study was conducted in 22 online HDF patients to investigate the impact of AF dialysis fluid on hemodynamic and cytokine changes compared with AC dialysis fluid in online HDF. The results demonstrated the comparable changes of arterial pressure between AF and AC online HDF. During the study periods, the incidences of composite intradialytic hypotension and other adverse events were not different. The baseline and hourly changes of cardiac index, cardiac output, and peripheral vascular resistance during dialysis were comparable (P=0.534, 0.199, and 0.641, respectively). The percent reductions of NT-proBNP and cTnT were not significantly different (72.6 ± 12.3 vs. 72.6 ± 12.8%, P=0.99 and 35.2 ± 12.8 vs. 36.7 ± 12.0%, P=0.51). The changes of all pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-2β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) during dialysis were comparable between both groups. In conclusion, AF dialysis solution does not offer additional hemodynamic benefit for stable online HDF patients. The hemodynamic stability provided by online HDF might protect the adverse effects of acetate.

A randomized controlled study on the effects of acetate-free biofiltration on organic anions and acid-base balance in hemodialysis patients

Metabolic acidosis correction is achieved by the transfer of bicarbonate and other buffer anions in dialysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the main anions of intermediary metabolism on standard hemodiafiltration (HDF) and on acetate-free biofiltration (AFB). A prospective, in-center, crossover study was carried out with 22 patients on maintenance dialysis. Patients were randomly assigned to start with 12 successive sessions of standard HDF with bicarbonate (34 mmol/L) and acetate dialysate (3 mmol/L) or 12 successive sessions of AFB without base in the dialysate. Acetate increased significantly during the standard HDF session from 0.078 ± 0.062 mmol/L to 0.156 ± 0.128 mmol/L (P < 0.05) and remained unchanged at 0.044 ± 0.034 mmol and 0.055 ± 0.028 mmol/L in AFB modality. Differences in the acetate levels were observed at two hours (P < 0.005), at the end (P < 0.005) and thirty minutes after the session between HDF and AFB (P < 0.05). There were significantly more patients above the normal range in HDF group than AFB group (68.1% vs 4.5% P < 0.005) postdialysis and 30 minutes later. Serum lactate and pyruvate concentrations decreased during the sessions without differences between modalities. Citrate decreased only in the AFB group (P < 0.05). Acetoacetate and betahydroxybutyrate increased in both modalities, but the highest betahydroxybutyrate values were detected in HDF (P < 0.05). The sum of postdialysis unusual measured organic anions (OA) were higher in HDF compared to AFB (P < 0.05). AFB achieves an optimal control of acid-base equilibrium through a bicarbonate substitution fluid. It also prevents hyperacetatemia and restores internal homeostasis with less production of intermediary metabolites.

Influence of an acetate- and a lactate-based balanced infusion solution on acid base physiology and hemodynamics: an observational pilot study

Background

The current pilot study compares the impact of an intravenous infusion of Ringer’s lactate to an acetate-based solution with regard to acid–base balance. The study design included the variables of the Stewart approach and focused on the effective strong ion difference. Because adverse hemodynamic effects have been reported when using acetate buffered solutions in hemodialysis, hemodynamics were also evaluated.

Methods

Twenty-four women who had undergone abdominal gynecologic surgery and who had received either Ringer’s lactate (Strong Ion Difference 28 mmol/L; n = 12) or an acetate-based solution (Strong Ion Difference 36.8 mmol/L; n = 12) according to an established clinical protocol and its precursor were included in the investigation. After induction of general anesthesia, a set of acid–base variables, hemodynamic values and serum electrolytes was measured three times during the next 120 minutes.

Results

Patients received a mean dose of 4,054 ± 450 ml of either one or the other of the solutions. In terms of mean arterial blood pressure and norepinephrine requirements there were no differences to observe between the study groups. pH and serum HCO₃^- concentration decreased slightly but significantly only with Ringer’s lactate. In addition, the acetate-based solution kept the plasma effective strong ion difference more stable than Ringer’s lactate.

Conclusions

Both of the solutions provided hemodynamic stability. Concerning consistency of acid base parameters none of the solutions seemed to be inferior, either. Whether the slight advantages observed for the acetate-buffered solution in terms of stability of pH and plasma HCO₃^- are clinically relevant, needs to be investigated in a larger randomized controlled trial.

[Acetate-free hemodialysis: what does it mean?]

Substituting bicarbonate by acetate in dialysis fluids has been proposed for avoiding precipitation of calcium and magnesium carbonates. However, acetate hemodialysis has been abandoned because of deleterious effects of acetate. Conventional bicarbonate hemodialysis is not totally acetate-free, because 3 to 7 mEq/l of acetic acid are added to the dialysate. Acetate-free hemodialysis is possible with another acid (chlorhydric acid or citric acid) or without acid by using some techniques of low-efficiency hemodiafiltration, as acetate-free biofiltration, which avoids the deleterious effect of blood acidification into the dialyzer. In this paper, advantages and disadvantages of different techniques of acetate-free hemodialysis are discussed.

Effects of acetate-free double-chamber hemodiafiltration and standard dialysis on systemic hemodynamics and troponin T levels

Using acetate as a buffer during hemodialysis is recognized to predispose to intradialytic hypotension; however, bicarbonate-based dialysis is not acetate free. Paired hemodiafiltration (PHF) is a novel online acetate-free technique. We investigated whether PHF is capable of abrogating the changes in systemic hemodynamics and troponin T (cTnT) seen with conventional hemodialysis. Twelve patients entered a randomized crossover study. Blood pressure (BP) and a full range of hemodynamic variables were measured throughout PHF and standard dialysis using continuous pulse wave analysis. We also measured predialysis cTnT in 54 stable and unstable dialysis patients. BP was lower during PHF but without increased instability. Stoke volume and cardiac output declined progressively during both treatments but to a much lesser extent during PHF (p = 0.003, p < 0.0001 respectively), whereas peripheral resistance rose to a larger degree during hemodialysis (p < 0.0001). cTnT levels were lower before PHF as compared with hemodialysis (p = 0.023), with levels falling after PHF and rising after hemodialysis (p < 0.0001). In the supplementary patient group, predialysis median serum cTnT was higher in the unstable patients (p = 0.0001). This study demonstrates that PHF (without exposure to acetate) is associated with less deterioration in systemic hemodynamics, maintenance of BP, and less suppression of myocardial contractility as compared with bicarbonate dialysis.

On-line haemodiafiltration with and without acetate

BACKGROUND

In patients on on-line convective treatments, given the considerable quantity of dialysis fluid re-infused, the small amount of acetate present in bicarbonate dialysis fluid as a pH stabilizing factor may allow a significant transfer of that anion to the patient, possibly inducing cytokine activation.

METHODS

To verify this hypothesis, we performed on-line haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) with (3 mmol/l) and without acetate in dialysis fluid in a cross-over randomized order on 12 prevalent patients.

RESULTS

In comparison with the pre-treatment values, plasma acetate levels were unchanged during and after acetate-free OL-HDF, while they were 5-6 times higher in the course of OL-HDF containing acetate in dialysis fluid; plasma acetate levels returned to basal values 2 h after the end of the procedure. The total increase of bases in the patient attributable to acetate was 36%. Plasma bicarbonate values at the end of treatment were significantly lower in treatments without acetate, as compared to those with acetate. Interleukin-6 plasma levels were super-imposable at the beginning and in the course of the two methods compared, but there was a tendency towards a greater increase at an interval of 2 h following OL-HDF with acetate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results confirm the assumption that body gain of acetate is particularly high in convective treatments, while acetate-free OL-HDF slows down acetate burden. Clinical advantages due to these effects should be evaluated in properly designed prospective studies.

Controversies and Issues in Hemodiafiltration Therapy

Hemodiafiltration appears to be the most effective technique of renal replacement therapy but several drawbacks are not counterbalanced by significant advantages. Although optimal transfer for both small and middle molecules can be achieved, there is no difference in mortality risk between HDF and HD patients. The infusion of a large amount of dialysate containing residual acetate of 2-7 mmol/l could lead to impaired cardiac contractile functions and carbonyl stress whereas loss of amino acids and water-soluble vitamins along with high UF rate could lead to malnutrition. Moreover, as substitution fluid is prepared on-line, contaminated fluid could be inadvertently infused to patients. Stringent maintenance rules are required for the production of sterile and non-pyrogenic dialysis solutions. Finally, daily hemodialysis could be the most promising mode of renal replacement therapy since it leads to a more stable 'milieu interieur' than other techniques whatever the mode of solutes removal when performed three times a week.