Need for dental care in older veterans: assessment of patient-based measures

[Organization of demand in oral health and family vulnerability]

The scope of this study was to analyze the relationship of an instrument of family vulnerability with sociodemographic, dental, and spatial distribution in a given territory. The dependent variable was the classification of family vulnerability, proposed by Coelho and Savassi. The independent variables were selected on the basis of the theoretical model proposed by Andersen. Hierarchical multiple logistic regression models were estimated. Kernel density estimation was used for spatial analysis. Subjects who lived with more than 4 people (OR = 3.46; 95% CI), who were dissatisfied with their oral health (OR = 2.38; 95% CI), who were ashamed to smile and talk (OR = 3.03, 95% CI) were more likely to be "at risk" in the family. Spatial analysis enabled the visualization of an area of ​​higher concentration of families "at risk". The relationship of the instrument of vulnerability analyzed with sociodemographic and dental factors, as well as the assistance in the visualization and identification of more vulnerable areas, are useful in the knowledge of the territory for the planning of actions in oral health, and the conclusion drawn is that the tool can be adopted for more equitable access by the oral health teams.

Impact of Making Dental Care Affordable on Quality of Life in Adults Aged 45 Years and Older

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the associations between self-reported ability to afford dental care and quality of life in adults aged 45 years and older. Method: We used publicly available cross-sectional data from the 2008 National Health Interview Survey and its oral health supplement for 11,760 adults aged 45+ years. The increased probabilities of reporting dental problems attributable to an inability to afford dental care were estimated from multivariate models and combined with respective dental problem disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease to measure loss in quality of life. Results: Prevalence of reported inability to afford dental care, severe tooth loss, severe periodontitis, and untreated caries were 11.9%, 8.5%, 14.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. Inability to afford dental care was associated with an increase of 0.017 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) per person per year under base case and 0.020 DALYs under generous assumptions. Conclusion: Making dental care affordable could improve adult's (age 45 and above) quality of life at a reasonable cost.

Low Income as a Multiplicative Risk Factor for Oral Pain and Dental Problems Among U.S. Veteran Smokers

PURPOSE

Compared to the United States (U.S.) general population, military veterans are at an increased risk of experiencing dental problems. This study documented associations between cigarette use and measures of dental/oral concern in a population of U.S. veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.

METHOD

A cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans Health and Needs Study, a study of U.S. military veterans. Out of 5000 surveys mailed to a random sample of OEF/OIF veterans, 1161 surveys were completed and returned. Among study respondents, N = 1114 had non-missing dental/oral pain data and were included for analysis. The survey also included smoking history and demographic information. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to cross-sectionally model the odds of experiencing dental/oral concerns as a function of smoking status. We also examined moderating effects of income and gender on the association between smoking and dental/oral concerns.

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate models, current smoking was associated with risk for dental/oral concerns. However, this association was qualified by a Smoking × Income interaction. For those earning above US$20,000, smoking was not associated with dental/oral concerns. Among veterans with low income, smoking was associated with three times higher odds of increased dental/oral concerns. There was no significant Gender × Smoking interaction.

CONCLUSION

These findings underscore the relevance of factors that moderate the association between smoking and dental/oral concern, namely income. Findings also underscore the importance of interventions to mitigate income disparities in oral healthcare.

Validade e utilidade da autopercepção de necessidade de tratamento odontológico por adultos e idosos

O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar a validade das medidas de autopercepção como indicador de necessidades de tratamentos odontológicos em adultos e idosos. A amostra foi composta por indivíduos que participaram da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal e da Pesquisa sobre as Condições de Saúde Bucal da População Mineira. A autopercepção da necessidade de tratamento dentário e de prótese total foi comparada com a necessidade determinada a partir do exame odontológico, considerado padrão-ouro. A qualidade das medidas foi avaliada por meio da sensibilidade, da especificidade e de valores preditivos. A sensibilidade variou de 51% a 90%, enquanto a especificidade ficou entre 56% e 90%. Os valores preditivos positivos foram de 11% a 95%, e os negativos, de 23% a 99%. A autopercepção de necessidade de tratamento dentário em adultos e de necessidade de próteses totais em idosos apresentou valores aceitáveis de validade. Por outro lado, a autopercepção da necessidade de tratamento por idosos e da necessidade de próteses totais por adultos não foi considerada útil devido a seu baixo desempenho.

Early life-course socioeconomic position, adult work-related factors and oral health disparities: cross-sectional analysis of the J-SHINE study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and oral health, and the associations of economic difficulties in childhood and workplace-related factors on these parameters.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 3201 workers aged 25-50 years, living in and around Tokyo, Japan, from the J-SHINE (Japanese study of Stratification, Health, Income, and Neighborhood) study. The response rate was 31.6%.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-rated oral health (SROH)-A logistic regression model was used to estimate ORs for the association between poor SROH and each indicator of SEP (annual household income, wealth, educational attainment, occupation and economic situation in childhood). Multiple imputation was used to address missing values.

RESULTS

Each indicator of SEP, including childhood SEP, was significantly inversely associated with SROH, and all of the workplace-related factors (social support in the workplace, job stress, working hours and type of employment) were also significantly associated with SROH. Compared with professionals, blue-collar workers had a significantly higher OR of poor SROH and the association was substantially explained by the workplace-related factors; ORs ranged from 1.44 in the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted model to 1.18 in the multivariate model. Poverty during childhood at age 5 and at age 15 was associated with poorer SROH, and these two factors seemed to be independently associated with SROH.

CONCLUSIONS

We found oral health disparity across SEP among workers in Japan. Approximately 60% of the association between occupation and SROH was explained by job-related factors. Economic difficulties during childhood appear to affect SROH in adulthood separately from sex, age and the current workplace-related factors.

Income-related inequalities in preventive and curative dental care use among working-age Japanese adults in urban areas: a cross-sectional study

Background

Preventive dental care use remains relatively low in Japan, especially among working-age adults. Universal health insurance in Japan covers curative dental care with an out-of-pocket payment limit, though its coverage of preventive dental care is limited. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that income inequality in dental care use is found in preventive, but not curative dental care among working-age Japanese adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a computer-assisted, self-administered format for community residents aged 25–50 years. In all, 4357 residents agreed to participate and complete the questionnaire (valid response rate: 31.3%). Preventive dental care use was measured according to whether the participant had visited a dentist or a dental hygienist during the past year for dental scaling or fluoride or orthodontic treatments. Curative dental care use was assessed by dental visits for other reasons. The main explanatory variable was equivalent household income. Logistic regression analyses with linear trend tests were conducted to determine whether there were significant income-related gradients with curative or preventive dental care use.

Results

Among the respondents, 40.0% of men and 41.5% of women had used curative dental care in the past year; 24.1% of men and 34.1% of women had used preventive care. We found no significant income-related gradients of curative dental care among either men or women (p = 0.234 and p = 0.270, respectively). Significant income-related gradients of preventive care were observed among both men and women (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Among women, however, income-related differences were no longer significant (p = 0.126) after adjusting for education and other covariates. Compared with men with the lowest income, the highest-income group had a 1.79-fold significantly higher probability for using preventive dental care.

Conclusions

The prevalence of preventive dental care use was lower than that of curative care. The results showed income-related inequality in preventive dental care use among men, though there were no significant income-related gradients of curative dental care use among either men or women. Educational attainment had a positive association with preventive dental care use only among women.

Palliative dental care- a boon for debilitating

World Health Organization defines "palliative care" as the active total care of patients whose disease is not responding to curative treatment. Palliative care actually deals with patients at the terminal end stage of the disease. We always face a question why a dentist should be in a palliative team? What is the exact role of dentist? Dental treatment may not always be strenuous and curative, but also can focus on improving quality of life of the patient. Hence forth the present paper enlightens the importance of dentist role in palliative team.

Oral health of substance-dependent individuals: impact of specific substances

Little is known about how different types of substances affect oral health. Our objective was to examine the respective effects of alcohol, stimulants, opioids, and marijuana on oral health in substance-dependent persons. Using self-reported data from 563 substance-dependent individuals, we found that most reported unsatisfactory oral health, with their most recent dental visit more than 1 year ago. In multivariable logistic regressions, none of the substance types were significantly associated with oral health status. However, opioid use was significantly related to a worse overall oral health rating compared to 1 year ago. These findings highlight the poor oral health of individuals with substance dependence and the need to address declining oral health among opioid users. General health and specialty addiction care providers should be aware of oral health problems among these patients. In addition, engagement into addiction and medical care may be facilitated by addressing oral health concerns.

Use of patient self-report oral health outcome measures in assessment of dental treatment outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the sensitivity of a newly developed brief measure of oral health-related quality of life (OQOL).

METHODS

Self-assessed oral health and OQOL were measured in three groups of patients who had presented for either prophylaxis (n = 32), endodontic care (n = 15), or for a denture (n = 16) in a dental school setting before and after treatment. Main outcome measures included the single-item self-report of oral health (OH-1) and the 6- and 12-item versions of a new OQOL instrument. General linear modeling was used to compute means of self-reported oral health by treatment group.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients who completed the baseline questionnaire, 44 (70 percent) returned questionnaires after treatment. The sample averaged 43 +/- 15 years, 48 percent male and 55 percent with some college education. Ethnic representation included 35 percent White, 33 percent Black, and 32 percent other - mostly Latino. The mean self-reported number of teeth was 20.6. In terms of sensitivity, significant differences were observed between the treatment groups on the items assessing being upset (P < 0.05), feeling depressed (P < 0.05), and uncomfortable about the appearance of teeth or dentures (P < 0.05). However, magnitude of change, as measured by an effect size, was characterized as minimal to small in the recall and endodontic groups and borderline moderate in the denture group.

CONCLUSION

The measure was sensitive to differences within groups, with a small to borderline magnitude of change.

Racial and ethnic disparities in children's oral health: the National Survey of Children's Health

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated racial/ethnic differences and their socioeconomic determinants in the oral health status of U.S. children, as reported by parents.

METHODS

The authors used interview data from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health, a large representative survey of U.S. children. They calculated weighted, nationally representative prevalence estimates for non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics, and they used logistic regression to explore the association between parents' reports of fair or poor oral health and various socioeconomic determinants of oral health.

RESULTS

The results showed significant racial/ethnic differences in parental reports of fair or poor oral health, with prevalences of 6.5 percent for non-Hispanic whites, 12.0 percent for non-Hispanic blacks and 23.4 percent for Hispanics. Although adjustments for family socioeconomic status (poverty level and education) partially explained these racial/ethnic disparities, Hispanics still were twice as likely as non-Hispanic whites to report their children's oral health as fair or poor, independent of socioeconomic status. The authors did find differences in preventive-care attitudes among groups. However, in multivariate models, such differences did not explain the disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant racial/ethnic disparities exist in parental reports of their children's oral health, with Hispanics being the most disadvantaged group. Disparities appear to exist independent of preventive-care attitudes and socioeconomic status.

The concept of validity in sociodental indicators and oral health-related quality-of-life measures

BACKGROUND

Most of the psychometric instruments used to measure quality of life associated with oral impairment and disability from the perspectives of older adults focus on negative experiences, and pay little attention to the possibility of positive reactions to disablement. This oversight challenges the validity of the instruments in current use, and raises questions about the process used to validate them.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we consider the general attributes of psychometric validity, and how they have been applied to oral health-related instruments.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The psychometric characteristics and predictive validity of existing dental instruments are still weak, probably because the instruments fail to address the broad range of personal variables that influence oral health, disability and quality of life. We recommend, therefore, that a continuous process of validation be adopted to include: (1) assessments of the theoretical framework supporting the instruments; (2) evaluations of the focus and structure of the questions used; and (3) enhancements of the prediction value of instruments applicable to oral health-related beliefs and behaviours.

Role of the Single Assessment Process in the Care of Older People. How Will Primary Dental Care Practitioners be Involved?

Following the publication of the National Service Framework for Older People, there have been developments across health and social care to facilitate holistic assessment of older people's needs, through what is called a ‘single assessment process’ or ‘SAP’. In this paper, readers are introduced to the SAP. The process can be seen as a ‘one-stop’ approach to the assessment of vulnerable older people that facilitates cross-referral between the agencies involved and triggers access to dental care. The paper explores the benefits of this new way of working in support of older people and how it will provide an opportunity for innovative dental practitioners to integrate oral healthcare for people with complex health and social care needs into the SAP. In concludes that as local commissioning evolves, opportunities for practitioners to develop targeted services for this important patient group should be expanded to improve the uptake of healthcare and oral healthcare.

Development and evaluation of a self-report measure for identifying type and use of removable partial dentures

AIM

To develop and validate a self-complete questionnaire suitable for use in primary dental care settings.

DESIGN

A questionnaire survey.

PARTICIPANTS

The research was undertaken in primary dental care (general dental practices, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) and two teaching hospitals (Newcastle Dental Hospital, UK; University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland). A self-assessment of numbers of teeth and removable partial dentures questionnaire was devised and distributed to 137 patients in the three settings. Following completion of the questionnaire, each patient's dentist then examined them and completed the same questionnaire. The two sets of information were then compared. In the second phase of the study, 37 subjects completed the questionnaire in their own home and their dentist completed the questionnaire at a subsequent clinical examination.

RESULTS

There was excellent agreement regarding counting of teeth [80%, Kappa = 0.79, s.e. 0.04 for maxillary teeth and 77%, Kappa = 0.68, s.e. 0.03 for mandibular teeth]. There was also good agreement between dentists and patients in terms of positioning of spaces in the dental arch (79.6-92.6%). Subjects in the study were also able to accurately identify the type of denture they had (either acrylic or cobalt-chromium based). These findings were confirmed in the second phase of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between dentists and patients was very good. This self-report measure could be of use when gathering data for studies of partially dentate patients.

Tooth loss and dentures: Patients’ perspectives

OBJECTIVE

Despite dramatic improvements in tooth retention around the world, a substantial proportion of older adults have lost natural teeth and many wear removable partial and complete dentures. Problems associated with tooth loss and denture wearing remain important in the context of global ageing. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of tooth loss and denture wearing on their day-to-day lives from the patient perspective.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Greater Boston area, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling older men.

METHODS

Brief examination and survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported oral health measures including the single-item self-rating of oral health, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), Oral-Health-related Quality of Life (OHQOL) and a newly-developed short-form instrument (the DELTA).

RESULTS

Men with > or = 25 teeth had better self-rated oral health by all measures. The new, brief DELTA differentiates between dentition/denture groupings as well as or better than existing instruments. Over 80% of men with > or = 25 teeth rated their oral health as excellent, very good or good, compared with 70% of men with no teeth (and dentures) and 54% of men with 1-24 teeth. Avoidance of certain foods discriminates well between dentition groups. To a lesser extent, difficulty with relaxation, pain and distress, and avoidance of going out are associated with tooth loss and/or denture wearing.

Tooth retention as an indicator of quality dental care: development of a risk adjustment model

BACKGROUND

Retaining teeth improves oral health and quality of life. Thus, receipt of a root canal (vs. a tooth extraction) is a useful indicator of the quality of dental care. However, use of this quality measure without adjusting for the severity of oral disease could lead to spurious conclusions.

OBJECTIVES

This paper describes the development of a dental severity adjustment methodology.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SUBJECTS

54,423 users of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) dental care who had either root canal therapy or a tooth extraction at a VA facility in Fiscal year 1998.

MEASURES

International Classification of Disease Clinical Modification codes for dental diagnoses and comorbid medical conditions. We modeled the effects of dental disease severity in logistic regression models of the probability of receiving a root canal, using both conceptual and Modified Delphi-Panel derived models, adjusting for age, and medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

Conceptual and Modified Delphi models performed similarly. The dental disease severity adjustments increased the fit in models of the probability of receiving a root canal (C-statistic = 0.822 for the conceptual model and 0.804 for the Modified Delphi Panel model) compared with the model including comorbid medical conditions alone (C-statistic = 0.561).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk adjustment for dental disease severity improves the fit of models of the probability of receiving a root canal. Studies of the quality of dental care should consider employing risk-adjusted models.