Interaction of implantable defibrillator therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme deletion/insertion polymorphism

RyR2 Common Gene Variant G1886S and the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in ICD Patients with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Cardiac ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) is critical to the electrical homeostasis of cardiomyocytes. Its gene variant rs3766871 entails channel destabilization and enhanced intracellular Ca(2+) oscillation, thus promoting cardiac arrhythmias. We investigated whether the RyR2 rs3766871 variant is associated with aborted sudden cardiac death or ICD therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT)/fibrillation (VF) in heart failure (HF) patients implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 183 HF patients with primary or secondary prevention ICD were divided in 2 groups. A VT/VF group was composed of secondary prevention patients and primary prevention patients with appropriate ICD intervention for VT/VF. An ICD control group was composed of primary prevention patients free from any appropriate ICD intervention after 43 ± 25 months follow-up. Study subjects were genotyped with respect to the rs3766871 RyR2 gene variant. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. In all, 56 patients constituted the VT/VF group and 127 patients the ICD control group. Male sex (HR: 3.02; 95% CI: 0.99-9.18; P = 0.05), atrial fibrillation (AF; HR: 2.33; 95% CI: 0.89-6.10; P = 0.08), and underuse of β-blockers (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 0.84-5.15; P = 0.11) were associated with the VT/VF phenotype. Prevalence of the rs3766871 minor allele was 2.8% in ICD control patients and 8.0% in the VT/VF group (P = 0.02). After adjustment for age, sex, AF, and use of β-blockers, the rs3766871 minor allele was associated with increased risk of VT/VF (HR: 3.49; 95% CI: 1.14-10.62; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies a significant role of RyR2 rs3766871 minor allele for increased susceptibility to VT/VF in a population of ICD patients with HF.

Angiotensin receptor type 1 single nucleotide polymorphism 1166A/C is associated with malignant arrhythmias and altered circulating miR-155 levels in patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular tachyarrhythmias accounts for approximately 450,000 annual deaths in the United States; many of these cases involve patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Prediction of which HF patients are most susceptible to SCD is difficult, and it is uncertain whether gene polymorphisms associated with HF outcomes are also linked to arrhythmic risk.

METHODS

We evaluated 485 patients with chronic HF to see whether the angiotensin receptor type 1 (AT1R) 1166A/C or angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) polymorphisms were associated with a higher rate of ventricular arrhythmias requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies over a 5-year period. We assessed the correlation between polymorphisms and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or ICD shocks.

RESULTS

Patients with AT1R-1166CC genotype had an increased rate of all events: ATP plus ICD shocks (P = .02). There was no association between ACE I/D genotype and ICD therapies. Furthermore, circulating levels of microRNA-155 (miR-155), a microRNA known to posttranscriptionally regulate AT1R expression, were significantly decreased in the CC compared with the AC and AA genotypes and were associated with ICD events.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the AT1R-1166CC genotype is associated with increased ICD therapies in patients with chronic HF, and the level of circulating miR-155 may be a potential marker for arrhythmic risk. Although these findings are novel, they will need replication and validation in larger cohorts of chronic HF patients.

The role of renin angiotensin system intervention in stage B heart failure

This article outlines the link between the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) and various forms of cardiomyopathy, and also reviews the understanding of the effectiveness of RAAS intervention in this phase of ventricular dysfunction. The authors focus their discussion predominantly on patients who have had previous myocardial infarction or those who have left ventricular hypertrophy and also briefly discuss the role of RAAS activation and intervention in patients with alcoholic cardiomyopathy.

Genetic Polymorphisms as Risk Stratification Tool in Primary Preventive ICD Therapy

More and more implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted as primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, major problem in practice is to identify high-risk patients for SCD. Different methods for noninvasive risk stratification do not have a sufficient positive or negative predictive value. Since current approaches lead to implantation of ICDs in a large number of patients who will never suffer an arrhythmic event and simultaneously patients still die of SCD who currently did not seem eligible for primary preventive ICD implantation, there is a need for additional tools for risk stratification. Epidemiological studies point to a hereditary risk of SCD. Different susceptibility of each person concerning arrhythmogenic events might be explained by genetic polymorphisms. By obtaining an individual “pattern” of polymorphisms of genes encoding for proteins which are important in arrhythmogenesis in one patient, risk stratification in primary prevention of SCD might by improved.

Genomics, heart failure and sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is among the most common causes of death in developed countries throughout the world. Despite decreased overall cardiac mortality, SCD rates appear to be increasing in concert with escalating global prevalence of coronary disease and heart failure, the two major conditions predisposing to SCD. This unfavorable trend is a consequence of our inability to identify those who will die suddenly from lethal ventricular arrhythmias and to develop effective therapies for all populations at risk. The known risk factors for SCD lack the predictive power needed to generate preventive strategies for the large number of fatal arrhythmic events that occur among lower-risk subsets of the population. Even among recognized high-risk subsets, prediction of SCD remains challenging. With the exception of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) there are few effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of SCD. This article discusses the prospect of genomic science as an approach to the identification of patients at high-risk for SCD. While the final common pathway for SCD is malignant ventricular arrhythmias, there are many potential contributors, pathways, and mechanisms by which common genetic variants (polymorphisms) could affect initiation and propagation of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Recent advances in genomic medicine now provide us with novel approaches to both identify candidate genes/pathways and relatively common polymorphisms which may predispose patients to increased risk for SCD. Improved understanding of the relationship between common polymorphisms and SCD will not only improve risk stratification such that ICDs can be targeted to those patients most likely to benefit from them but also provide new insight into the pathophysiology of SCD.

Genetic profiling as a marker for risk of sudden cardiac death

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical trials provide evidence that an empirical approach of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in all heart failure patients (ejection fraction </= 35%) with mild to moderate symptoms effectively reduces mortality rate as compared to the best available medical therapy. At least 50% of patients, however, will succumb to a non-arrhythmic demise and over half of all patients will not require device therapy over long-term follow-up. Thus, the approach of empiric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is costly in light of the considerable expense of device cost, implantation, and patient follow-up. This review discusses the prospect of genomic medicine as an approach to assess genetic susceptibility to sudden arrhythmic death in at-risk populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through the past 10 years of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator trials, the number of patients needed to treat to prevent a sudden death has risen from one in four patients to one in 14. Although numerous clinical tests exist for stratification, they are of low positive predictive value in assessing arrhythmic risk, and have not been prospectively validated as effective strategies in identifying arrhythmia-prone patients. Recent data from genetic studies identifying genes responsible for sudden cardiac death have compiled a list of relatively common genetic variations (polymorphisms). These polymorphisms, encoding for proteins known to be involved in cardiac electrophysiology, may contribute to arrhythmic risk in the milieu of heart failure.

SUMMARY

Current clinical indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in primary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death necessarily include a significant number of patients who may not benefit. The identification of common genetic variations causing an increased risk of vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmia in heart failure patients may optimize the use of medical resources through rapid identification of sub-populations at highest risk.