Tascon I, Côté C, Garneau B, Desharnais B, Gosselin V, Mireault P. Postmortem redistribution of cannabinoids: Statistical analysis of a novel dataset and meta-analysis.
Forensic Sci Int 2023;
353:111873. [PMID:
37944415 DOI:
10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111873]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The assessment of human postmortem concentrations of Δ9-THC (THC) and its metabolites, 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH) and 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), is routinely performed in forensic toxicology laboratories. However, the literature on cannabinoids postmortem redistribution (PMR) is scarce and highlights their complex postmortem changes. This study aims to investigate the postmortem behavior of THC and its metabolites in order to provide practitioners with potential indicators of PMR. To do so, antemortem and postmortem cases positive for cannabinoids were compiled in a database. Its analysis shows significantly higher THC concentrations in postmortem blood than in antemortem blood. Antemortem and postmortem blood also present significantly different profiles for their THC to THCCOOH ratios. Whereas antemortem blood generally shows THCCOOH concentrations higher or equal to THC, several postmortem cases show the opposite, with THC concentrations higher than THCCOOH. While occurrence of postmortem redistribution (PMR) is difficult to measure directly, an evaluation was performed using the central to peripheral (C/P) blood concentrations ratio as a proxy. With a C/P significantly lower than 1.0 for THC and significantly higher than 1.0 for THCCOOH, the PMR hypothesis is supported for both compounds, with redistribution towards peripheral blood for THC and towards central blood for THCCOOH. On the other hand, 11-OH-THC does not show a C/P significantly different than 1.0, suggesting the absence of PMR. Influence of body mass index, conservation state and postmortem interval on C/P was statistically analyzed and no significant impact was observed. To compare and contrast C/P observed in the database with those published in the literature, a meta-analysis was performed using a median of median (MM) model. THC PMR towards peripheral blood is supported by a global estimate of 0.81 (CI95%: 0.51 to 1.2). Redistribution towards femoral blood appears to be stronger than towards iliac blood; indeed, the median estimate of C/P decreases to 0.64 (CI95%: 0.40 to 1.1) when studies with iliac blood were removed from the meta-analysis. THCCOOH PMR towards central blood is supported by a C/P median estimate of 1.3 (CI95%: 0.97 to 1.6). THC PMR can be suspected when these indicators are observed (i) high THC blood concentration (>50 ng/mL), (ii) THC C/P lower than 1.0 (iii) blood THC/THCCOOH concentration ratios greater than 1.0 and (iv) non-detectability of THCCOOH in urine. In postmortem samples, many factors may contribute to the overestimation of THC concentration, therefore a careful interpretation is required, relying on both central and peripheral blood samples.
Collapse