Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for screening patients with imported malaria in a non-endemic setting

Implementation and validation of a new qPCR assay to detect imported human Plasmodium species

Diagnosis of imported malaria is based on microscopic examination of blood smears (BS), detection of circulating plasmodial antigen by immunochromatography (ICT), or detection of Plasmodium spp. DNA by loop mediated isothermal amplification. We have developed duplex (Plasmodium spp. and Plasmodium falciparum) real-time PCR (qPCR) and species-specific qPCR assays for the identification and quantification of human Plasmodium species. Whole nucleic acids from 523 samples prospectively collected from 410 patients suspected of malaria between June 2016 and March 2021 were tested by qPCRs and compared to standard diagnostic procedures. All qPCRs were designed on 18S ribosomal ribonucleic acid. The limit of detection of duplex qPCR was 8 copies/reaction, and analytical specificity of species-specific qPCRs was 100%. Seventy-nine patients diagnosed for single species malaria involving P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, and P. malariae were positive with duplex and species-specific qPCRs. P. knowlesi qPCR detected DNA from a P. knowlesi culture. Of eight cases of mixed Plasmodium species infection, five were identified with our qPCR assays with better sensitivity as compared to BS and ICT. Eight out of 323 patients with negative BS were hospitalized for symptoms suggestive malaria after malaria-endemic area travel or known with history of malaria had a low positive duplex qPCR. Between day of diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up at D2-D4 of malaria, a 3.1-log P. falciparum load decrease was observed by qPCR. These new Plasmodium qPCRs allowing detection of human plasmodial species have excellent species specificity and allow rapid detection of P. falciparum cases, malaria with low parasitaemia, and mixed Plasmodium species infection.IMPORTANCEMalaria is a disease transmitted by a Plasmodium parasite genus. Most cases are caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Despite a significant drop of incidence and mortality since 2000, 249million cases and 608,000 deaths have been estimated in 2022, mainly in Africa. Due to the increasing number of travels to endemic areas, incidence of imported malaria is rising in Europe. Various techniques are used in European laboratories, such as microscopic examination of thin and thick smears and rapid diagnostic tests. However, these techniques require skilled operators to differentiate plasmodial species and have limited sensitivity. Actually, molecular diagnosis is carried out using point-of-care test for rapid results with excellent sensitivity but is unabled to determine involved species and assess parasitaemia. In this study, we developed a combined molecular tool based on both detection of all human plasmodial species (Plasmodium spp.) and P. falciparum. We have also developed specific qPCRs for each human plasmodial species.

Direct or DNA Extraction-Free Amplification and Quantification of Foodborne Pathogens

The use of direct nucleic acid amplification of pathogens from food matrices has the potential to reduce time to results over DNA extraction-based approaches as well as traditional culture-based approaches. Here we describe protocols for assay design and experiments for direct amplification of foodborne pathogens in food sample matrices using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The examples provided include the detection of Escherichia coli in milk samples and Salmonella in pork meat samples. This protocol includes relevant reagents and methods including obtaining target sequences, assay design, sample processing, and amplification. These methods, though used for specific example matrices, could be applied to many other foodborne pathogens and sample types.

Malaria diagnosis using a combined system of a simple and fast extraction method with a lyophilised Dual-LAMP assay in a non-endemic setting

Malaria is a parasitic disease distributed in tropical areas but with a high number of imported cases in non-endemic countries. The most specific and sensitive malaria diagnostic methods are PCR and LAMP. However, both require specific equipment, extraction procedures and a cold chain. This study aims to solve some limitations of LAMP method with the optimization and validation of six LAMP assays, genus and species-specific, using an easy and fast extraction method, the incorporation of a reaction control assay, two ways (Dual) of result reading and reagent lyophilization. The Dual-LAMP assays were validated against the Nested-Multiplex Malaria PCR. A conventional column and saline extraction methods, and the use of lyophilized reaction tubes were also assessed. A new reaction control Dual-LAMP-RC assay was designed. Dual-LAMP-Pspp assay showed no cross-reactivity with other parasites, repeatability and reproducibility of 100%, a significant correlation between parasite concentration and time to amplification and a LoD of 1.22 parasites/µl and 5.82 parasites/µl using column and saline extraction methods, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the six Dual-LAMP assays reach values of 100% or close to this, being lower for the Dual-LAMP-Pm. The Dual-LAMP-RC assay worked as expected. Lyophilized Dual-LAMP results were concordant with the reference method. Dual-LAMP malaria assays with the addition of a new reaction control LAMP assay and the use of a fast and easy saline extraction method, provided low limit of detection, no cross-reactivity, and good sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, the reagent lyophilization and the dual result reading allow their use in most settings.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for screening congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental impairment in newborns. However, congenital CMV infection cannot be diagnosed using samples collected more than 3 weeks after birth because testing after this time cannot distinguish between congenital infection and postnatal infection. Herein, we developed a robust loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the large-scale screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection. In contrast to conventional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), which detects CMV within a dynamic range of 1.0 × 106 to 1.0 × 102 copies/μL, our quantitative LAMP assay (qLAMP) detects CMV within a dynamic range of 1.1 × 108 to 1.1 × 103 copies/μL. Moreover, the turnaround time for obtaining results following DNA extraction is 90 min in qPCR but only 15 min in qLamp. The colorimetric LAMP assay can also detect CMV down to 1.1 × 103 copies/μL within 30 min, irrespective of the type of heat source. Our LAMP assay can be utilized in central laboratories as an alternative to conventional qPCR for quantitative CMV detection, or for point-of-care testing in low-resource environments, such as developing countries, via colorimetric naked-eye detection. KEY POINTS: • LAMP assay enables large-scale screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection. • LAMP allows colorimetric or quantitative detection of congenital CMV infection. • LAMP assay can be used as a point-of-care testing tool in low-resource environments.

Application of a low-cost, specific, and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to detect Plasmodium falciparum imported from Africa

BACKGROUND

Chinese citizens traveling abroad bring back imported malaria cases to China. Current malaria diagnostic tests, including microscopy and antigen-detecting rapid tests, cannot reliably detect low-density infections. To complement existing diagnostic methods, we aimed to develop a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to detect and identify Plasmodium falciparum in Chinese travelers returning from Africa.

METHODS

We developed a miniaturized LAMP assay to amplify the actin I gene of P. falciparum. Each reaction consumed only 25% of the reagents used in a conventional LAMP assay and the same amount of DNA templates used in nested PCR. We evaluated this LAMP assay's performance and compared it to microscopy and a nested PCR assay using 466 suspected malaria cases imported from Africa. We assessed the sensitivity of the new LAMP assay using cultured P. falciparum, clinical samples, and a plasmid construct, allowing unprecedented precision when quantifying the limit of detection.

RESULTS

The new LAMP assay was highly sensitive and detected two more malaria cases than nested PCR. Compared to nested PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the novel LAMP assay were 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 98.5-100%] and 99.1% (95% CI 96.7-99.9%), respectively. When evaluated using serial dilutions of the plasmid construct, the detection limit of the new LAMP was as low as 10² copies/μL, 10-fold lower than PCR. The LAMP assay detected 0.01 parasites/μL of blood (equal to 0.04 parasites/μL of DNA) using cultured P. falciparum and 1-7 parasites/μL of blood (4-28 parasites/μL of DNA) in clinical samples, which is as good as or better than previously reported and commercially licensed assays.

CONCLUSION

The novel LAMP assay based on the P. falciparum actin I gene was specific, sensitive, and cost-effective, as it consumes 1/4 of the reagents in a typical LAMP reaction.

Diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence flow-cytometry technology using Sysmex XN-31 for imported malaria in a non-endemic setting

Malaria diagnosis based on microscopy is impaired by the gradual disappearance of experienced microscopists in non-endemic areas. Aside from the conventional diagnostic methods, fluorescence flow cytometry technology using Sysmex XN-31, an automated haematology analyser, has been registered to support malaria diagnosis. The aim of this prospective, monocentric, non-interventional study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the XN-31 for the initial diagnosis or follow-up of imported malaria cases compared to the reference malaria tests including microscopy, loop mediated isothermal amplification, and rapid diagnostic tests. Over a one-year period, 357 blood samples were analysed, including 248 negative and 109 positive malaria samples. Compared to microscopy, XN-31 showed sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 97.13–100) and specificity of 98.39% (95% CI: 95.56–100) for the initial diagnosis of imported malaria cases. Moreover, it provided accurate species identification asfalciparumor non-falciparumand parasitaemia determination in a very short time compared to other methods. We also demonstrated that XN-31 was a reliable method for patient follow-up on days 3, 7, and 28. Malaria diagnosis can be improved in non-endemic areas by the use of dedicated haematology analysers coupled with standard microscopy or other methods in development, such as artificial intelligence for blood slide reading. Given that XN-31 provided an accurate diagnosis in 1 min, it may reduce the time interval before treatment and thus improve the outcome of patient who have malaria.

Usefulness of a commercial LAMP assay for detection of malaria infection, including Plasmodium knowlesi cases, in returning travelers in Spain

Objective

Main malaria diagnosis is based on microscopic examination combined with rapid diagnostic tests. Both methods have low sensitivity and specificity. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification techniques have shown a sensitivity similar to PCR but with lower times of performance. This study aimed to assess a commercial LAMP for the diagnosis of malaria (Alethia® Malaria) against the Nested-Multiplex-Malaria PCR, including the analytical sensitivity and the operational characteristics.

Results

One hundred five samples out of 114 rendered valid results, obtaining 85 positive samples and 18 negative samples with an agreement of 98% compared to the reference method with a sensitivity, specificity and kappa coefficient of 98.84%, 94.74% and 0.94 respectively, with only two discrepant samples. The turnaround time was estimated in 1 h and 30 min, with a cost of 32.67€ per determination. The results showed several advantages of the Alethia® Malaria, as it was easy to perform, minimal training requirement and 40 min run. Moreover, it includes an internal control to avoid false negatives. However, it also showed some limitations such as the need for a specific amplification and detection device, the detection of only Plasmodium spp. and a very high price.

Fast detection and quantification of Plasmodium species infected erythrocytes in a non-endemic region by using the Sysmex XN-31 analyzer

Background

Due to increased travel from endemic countries, malaria occurs more frequently in non-endemic regions. It is a challenge for diagnostic laboratories in non-endemic countries to provide reliable results, as experience of staff is often limited to only a few cases per year. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the fully automated Sysmex XN-31 malaria analyzer in a routine diagnostic setting in a non-endemic region was evaluated.

Methods

Samples from 112 patients suspected for malaria were examined by the Sysmex XN-31 analyzer to determine the absolute count of malaria-infected red blood cells count (MI-RBC/µL). Microscopic examination of both Quantitative Buffy Coat capillary tubes and thick and thin blood films were used as reference methods. Limits of blank (LoB), detection (LoD) and quantification (LoQ) were investigated using an in vitro Plasmodium falciparum culture. Nine hundred twenty samples of patients with RBC abnormalities were included to determine which RBC abnormalities trigger indeterminate or false positive results.

Results

No false positive nor false negative results were obtained for the examined patient samples suspected for malaria. For 3% of samples an indeterminate result by the XN-31 was obtained. The Passing-Bablok regression line for diagnostic accuracy of the parasitaemia was y = 39.75 + 0.7892 × showing a positive bias of about 21% when comparing the MI-RBC results to microscopy. The LoB, LoD and LoQ were calculated to be 4.7, 5.9, and 19.0 infected RBC/μL, respectively. From the 920 abnormal RBC samples collected, 4.6% resulted in a false positive MI-RBC result and almost half of the samples produced indeterminate results. These results were related to increases in nucleated red blood cells, reticulocytes and other abnormal RBC morphologies such as sickle cells.

Conclusions

Based on the results, the XN-31 is a fast and reliable screening method in the detection and quantification of Plasmodium species in patients However, if an abnormal red blood cell morphology is present, the results of the XN-31 should be interpreted with caution as false positive results can be caused by interfering abnormal erythrocytes.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the diagnosis of imported malaria: a narrative review

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a molecular method to detect malaria recently introduced in the market. LAMP is simple to perform and does not require advanced equipment and training thus satisfying the qualification as a point-of-care diagnostic screening test. In this narrative review, we focus on the role of LAMP for malaria diagnosis in non-endemic settings. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar, using the following search terms: 'Malaria LAMP' in combination with 'imported malaria' or 'travellers' malaria' or 'non-endemic setting' or 'non-endemic region' or 'malaria screening' or 'malaria diagnosis'. References of each article were also reviewed for possible studies or reports not identified in our search. Overall, 18 studies encompassing 6289 tested samples with 1663 confirmed malaria diagnoses were retrieved. Most of these studies (13/18, 72.2%) were conducted in Europe, and almost half were retrospective. Fourteen studies (77.8%) employed real-time or nested-polymerase chain reaction as the reference method for confirming malaria diagnosis. Sensitivity of LAMP ranged from 93.9 to 100% and specificity from 93.8 to 100% with a negative predictive value of 99.6%-100%. The rate of reported invalid results requiring repeat of the test varied from 0.01% to 5.7%, but they were solved in the majority of cases with a secondary analysis. In non-endemic countries the adoption of LAMP malaria assay as the screening test for malaria diagnosis seems to perform better than conventional methods. However, blood microscopy remains essential to either identify Plasmodium species and quantify parasitaemia and adequately managing malaria cases.

The value of lamp to rule out imported malaria diagnosis: a retrospective observational study in Milan, Italy

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of malaria in returning travellers could be a challenge in non-endemic settings. We aimed to assess the performance of LAMP in comparison with standard conventional diagnostic methods using real-time-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in case of discordant results.

METHODS

All travellers returning from malaria-endemic areas who presented to our Emergency Department (ED) from January 2017 to December 2020 with signs and symptoms suggestive for malaria were included. Blood microscopy was the reference diagnostic method applied at our laboratory with LAMP implemented as an additional method to aid in malaria diagnosis. PCR was employed only in case of between test's discordant results. Sensitivity and specificity of microscopy compared to LAMP were calculated with the confidence interval of 95%.

RESULTS

Four-hundred and eight patients (55.6% male, median age 42 years) were screened for malaria. The diagnosis was confirmed in 49 cases (12%): 44 cases (90%) caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Peripheral blood smear missed to identify three malaria cases, which tested positive with LAMP and PCR. One case of malaria caused by P. malariae in a naive tourist, one case by P. falciparum in a semi-immune pregnant women and one case by P. falciparum in a previously treated semi-immune patient. All the discordant cases were characterized by a very low parasitaemia. Microscopy when compared to LAMP showed a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.1-98.7%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98.9-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our non-endemic setting LAMP was able to identify malaria cases with low-level parasitaemia otherwise missed by blood microscopy.

Malaria diagnosis in a malaria non-endemic high-resource country: high variation of diagnostic strategy in clinical laboratories in the Netherlands

Background

Microscopic examination of thick and thin blood films is the gold standard in current guidelines for the diagnosis of malaria, but guidelines do not uniformly agree on which combination of other methods should be used and when.

Methods

Three questionnaires were sent between March 2018 and September 2019 to laboratories subscribing to the external quality assessment scheme for the diagnosis of blood and intestinal parasites of the Dutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories in order to investigate how much variation in the laboratory diagnosis of malaria between different clinical laboratories is present in the Netherlands.

Results

The questionnaires were partially or fully completed by 67 of 77 (87%) laboratories. Only 9 laboratories reported 10 or more malaria positive patients per year. Most laboratories use a different diagnostic strategy, within office versus outside office hours depending on the screening assay result. Within office hours, 62.5% (35/56) of the responding laboratories perform an immunochromatographic test (ICT) in combination with microscopic examination of thick and thin blood films without additional examinations, such as Quantitative Buffy Coat and/or rtPCR analysis. Outside office hours 85.7% (48/56) of laboratories use an ICT as single screening assay and positive results are immediately confirmed by thick and thin blood films without additional examinations (89.6%, 43/48). In case of a negative ICT result outside office hours, 70.8% (34/48) of the laboratories perform microscopic examination of the thick film the next morning and 22.9% (11/48) confirm the negative ICT result immediately. Furthermore, substantial differences were found in the microscopic examinations of thick and thin blood films; the staining, theoretical sensitivity of the thick film and determination of parasitaemia.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a remarkably high variation between laboratories in both their diagnostic strategy as well as their methods for microscopic examination for the diagnosis of malaria in a clinical setting, despite existing national and international guidelines. While the impact of these variations on the accuracy of the diagnosis of malaria is yet unknown, these findings should stimulate clinical laboratories to critically review their own diagnostic strategy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-021-03889-7.

Diagnostic Methods for Non-Falciparum Malaria

Malaria is a serious public health problem that affects mostly the poorest countries in the world, killing more than 400,000 people per year, mainly children under 5 years old. Among the control and prevention strategies, the differential diagnosis of the Plasmodium-infecting species is an important factor for selecting a treatment and, consequently, for preventing the spread of the disease. One of the main difficulties for the detection of a specific Plasmodium sp is that most of the existing methods for malaria diagnosis focus on detecting P. falciparum. Thus, in many cases, the diagnostic methods neglect the other non-falciparum species and underestimate their prevalence and severity. Traditional methods for diagnosing malaria may present low specificity or sensitivity to non-falciparum spp. Therefore, there is high demand for new alternative methods able to differentiate Plasmodium species in a faster, cheaper and easier manner to execute. This review details the classical procedures and new perspectives of diagnostic methods for malaria non-falciparum differential detection and the possibilities of their application in different circumstances.

Malaria Screening Using Front-Line Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

OBJECTIVES

We implemented front-line loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based malaria screening in our nonendemic multicenter health region to reduce reliance on microscopy without sacrificing diagnostic efficiency. We aimed to evaluate changes in test volumes, positivity rates, turnaround times, and approximate labor time savings resulting from implementation of LAMP-based malaria testing to assess the efficacy of the novel testing algorithm in our regional hub-and-spoke testing model.

METHODS

We reviewed data generated from institutional malaria testing between 2016 and 2019, having implemented LAMP in October 2018 as a front-line screening test for all malaria investigations from our hub facility and investigations from satellite facilities with negative rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and microscopy.

RESULTS

Blood film microscopy and RDT workloads decreased substantially in the year following LAMP implementation (by 90% and 46%, respectively,) despite similar numbers of patients tested and positivity rates for malaria compared with historical data. LAMP turnaround times (TATs) were comparable to historical TATs for RDTs, and TATs for RDTs and thick films did not increase with the change in workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

LAMP was successfully implemented in our multicenter health region malaria diagnostic algorithm, significantly reducing reliance on microscopic evaluations and RDT and providing substantial labor time savings without compromising TATs.

Recrudescence of a high parasitaemia, severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria episode, treated by artesunate monotherapy

A patient presenting with severe malaria, with hyperparasitaemia, received 7-day artesunate monotherapy. A severe recrudescence was detected and attributed to hyperparasitaemia, monotherapy and a polyclonal infection without Kelch 13 gene mutation. A second treatment with artesunate, then quinine, followed by artemether-lumefantrine, was successful.

Performance and Application of Commercially Available Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Kits in Malaria Endemic and Non-Endemic Settings

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a sensitive molecular tool suitable for use as a near point-of-care test for the diagnosis of malaria. Recent meta-analyses have detailed high sensitivity and specificity of malaria LAMP when compared to microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests, and polymerase chain reaction in both endemic and non-endemic settings. Despite this, the use of malaria LAMP has primarily been limited to research settings to date. In this review, we aim to assess to what extent commercially available malaria LAMP kits have been applied in different settings, and to identify possible obstacles that may have hindered their use from being adopted further. In order to address this, we conducted a literature search in PubMed.gov using the search terms (((LAMP) OR (Loop-mediated isothermal amplification)) AND ((Malaria) OR (Plasmodium))). Focusing primarily on studies employing one of the commercially available kits, we then selected three key areas of LAMP application for further review: the performance and application of LAMP in malaria endemic settings including low transmission areas; LAMP for malaria screening during pregnancy; and malaria LAMP in returning travelers in non-endemic settings.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) methods compared with microscopy, polymerase chain reaction and rapid diagnostic tests for malaria diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis is a challenging issue for eliminating malaria. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) could be an alternative to conventional methods. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LAMP for malaria compared with microscopy, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs).

METHODS AND DESIGN

MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from inception to 1 July 2019. Prospective and retrospective, randomised and non-randomised, mono-center and multi-center studies, including symptomatic or asymptomatic patients, that reported one LAMP method and one comparator (microscopy, RDT or PCR) were included. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017075186.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies published between 2006 and 2019 were included, leading to the analysis of 30,641 LAMP tests. The pooled sensitivity of LAMP remained between 96% and 98%, whichever the comparator. The pooled specificity of LAMP was around 95%, but was a little higher if the best PCR studies were considered. The AUC was found to be >0.98, whichever the subgroup of studies was considered. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was found to be around 1000 for all subgroups, except for Plasmodium vivax.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed that the LAMP method is robust for diagnosing malaria, both in symptomatic and asymptomatic people. Thus, the impact of LAMP for controlling malaria is expected to be important.

Rapid diagnostic tests failing to detect infections by Plasmodium falciparum encoding pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in a non-endemic setting

Background

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) detecting the histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) have a central position for the management of Plasmodium falciparum infections. Yet, variable detection of certain targeted motifs, low parasitaemia, but also deletion of pfhrp2 gene or its homologue pfhrp3, may result in false-negative RDT leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. This study aimed at investigating the prevalence, and understanding the possible causes, of P. falciparum RDT-negative infections at Montpellier Academic Hospital, France.

Methods

The prevalence of falsely-negative RDT results reported before and after the introduction of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, as part as the malaria screening strategy in January 2017, was analysed. Negative P. falciparum RDT infections were screened for pfhrp2 or pfhrp3 deletion; and exons 2 were sequenced to show a putative genetic diversity impairing PfHRP2 detection.

Results

The overall prevalence of P. falciparum negative RDTs from January 2006 to December 2018 was low (3/446). Whereas no cases were reported from 2006 to 2016 (0/373), period during which the malaria diagnostic screen was based on microscopy and RDT, prevalence increased up to 4.1% (3/73) between 2017 and 2018, when molecular detection was implemented for primary screening. Neither pfhrp2/3 deletion nor major variation in the frequency of repetitive epitopes could explain these false-negative RDT results.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the presence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in three P. falciparum RDT-negative infections and reviews the possible reasons for non-detection of HRP2/3 antigens in a non-endemic setting. It highlights the emergence of falsely negative rapid diagnostic tests in a non-endemic setting and draws attention on the risk of missing malaria cases with low parasitaemia infections using the RDT plus microscopy-based strategy currently recommended by French authorities. The relevance of a novel diagnostic scheme based upon a LAMP assay is discussed.

Rapid diagnostic tests for infectious diseases in the emergency department

Background

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for infectious diseases, with a turnaround time of less than 2 hours, are promising tools that could improve patient care, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention in the emergency department (ED) setting. Numerous RDTs have been developed, although not necessarily for the ED environment. Their successful implementation in the ED relies on their performance and impact on patient management.

Objectives

The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of currently available RDTs for infectious diseases in the ED.

Sources

PubMed was searched through August 2019 for available studies on RDTs for infectious diseases. Inclusion criteria included: commercial tests approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Conformité Européenne (CE) in vitro diagnostic devices with data on clinical samples, ability to run on fully automated systems and result delivery within 2 hours.

Content

A nonexhaustive list of representative commercially available FDA- or CE-approved assays was categorized by clinical syndrome: pharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, gastrointestinal infection, meningitis and encephalitis, fever in returning travellers and sexually transmitted infection, including HIV. The performance of tests was described on the basis of clinical validation studies. Further, their impact on clinical outcomes and anti-infective use was discussed with a focus on ED-based studies.

Implications

Clinicians should be familiar with the distinctive features of each RDT and individual performance characteristics for each target. Their integration into ED work flow should be preplanned considering local constraints of given settings. Additional clinical studies are needed to further evaluate their clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

Case Report: Hyperreactive Malarial Splenomegaly Syndrome Diagnosed with Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification and Treated with Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy

Hyperreactive malarial splenomegaly syndrome (HMSS) is a rare cause of splenomegaly in the Western world. Hyperreactive malarial splenomegaly syndrome is caused by an aberrant immunological response to chronic malaria exposure in endemic areas. Revised Fakunle's criteria may be helpful for diagnosis: persistent splenomegaly (> 10 cm below the costal margin), increased anti-Plasmodium antibodies, increased IgM levels, exclusion of other causes of splenomegaly or malignancy, and a favorable response to antimalarial treatment. We describe the case of a 16-year-old patient, who recently arrived in Belgium from Guinea with a history of splenomegaly and B symptoms in whom HMSS diagnosis was achieved, thanks to the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method. To our knowledge, this is also the first described case treated by dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine.

Use of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification in a Resource-Saving Strategy for Primary Malaria Screening in a Non-Endemic Setting

Malaria is traditionally diagnosed by blood smear microscopy, which requires continuous resource-demanding training. In areas with only a few cases of malaria, a simple and rapid test that can reliably exclude malaria could significantly reduce the need for microscopy and training. We evaluated whether loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for screening malaria parasites could reduce the workload in the diagnosis of malaria. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification was used to analyze 38 ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood samples from 23 patients who had previously been tested for malaria by microscopy, antigen-based rapid diagnostic test (antigen-RDT), and in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The samples included blood with low-level parasitaemia and samples with discrepancies between the results of the different methods. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification detected malaria parasites in 27 of 28 samples that were positive according to in-house RT-PCR. There were negative microscopy results in 10 of these and negative antigen-RDT results in 11. The sample with a negative LAMP result and positive in-house RT-PCR result was from a patient who had recently been treated for low-level Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasitaemia. We found LAMP to be reliable for malaria screening and suitable for replacing microscopy without loss of performance. The low number of LAMP-positive samples needing microscopy can be handled by a limited number of trained microscopists. The time saved on training and documentation was estimated to be 520 working hours yearly in our laboratory. Using LAMP for primary screening of patient samples, we have made a diagnostic workflow that ensures more reliable, faster, and less resource-demanding diagnosis of malaria.

Asymptomatic malaria in the clinical and public health context

Introduction: Historically, the global community has focused on the control of symptomatic malaria. However, interest in asymptomatic malaria has been growing, particularly in the context of malaria elimination.Areas covered: We undertook a comprehensive PubMed literature review on asymptomatic malaria as it relates to detection and elimination with emphasis between 2014 and 2019. Diagnostic tools with a low limit of detection (LOD) have allowed us to develop a more detailed understanding of asymptomatic malaria and its impact. These highly sensitive diagnostics have demonstrated that the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria is greater than previously thought. In addition, it is now possible to detect the malaria reservoir in the community, something that was previously not feasible. Asymptomatic malaria has previously not been treated, but research has begun to examine whether treating individuals with asymptomatic malaria may lead to health benefits. Finally, we have begun to understand the importance of asymptomatic malaria in ongoing transmission.Expert opinion: Therefore, with malaria elimination back on the agenda, asymptomatic malaria can no longer be ignored, especially in light of new ultra-sensitive diagnostic tools.

Performance evaluation of different strategies based on microscopy techniques, rapid diagnostic test and molecular loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the diagnosis of imported malaria

OBJECTIVES

Malaria is one of most common tropical diseases encountered in travellers and migrants. It requires an urgent and reliable diagnosis considering its potential severity. In this study, performance of five diagnostic assays were evaluated in a nonendemic region and compared prospectively to quantitative PCR (qPCR).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at Toulouse Hospital from August 2017 to January 2018 and included all patients with initial Plasmodium screening. Thin and thick blood smears (TnS, TkS), quantitative buffy coat (QBC), rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and commercial loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) were independently performed on each blood sample and compared to our qPCR reference standard.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 331 patients, mainly returning from Africa. qPCR detected 73 Plasmodium-positive samples (including 58 falciparum). Individually, LAMP had a 97.3% (71/73) sensitivity, far ahead of TnS (84.9%, 62/73), TkS (86.3%, 63/73), QBC (86.3%, 63/73) and RDT (86.3%, 63/73). RDT demonstrated a high sensitivity for falciparum (98.3%, 57/58) but missed all ovale, malariae and knowlesi infections. Specificity was excellent for all techniques (99.6-100%). The most sensitive diagnosis strategies were TnS + RDT (95.9%, 70/73), TnS + LAMP (97.3%, 71/73) and TnS + RDT + LAMP (100%, 73/73), about 10% higher than strategies using exclusively microscopy, TkS + TnS (87.7%, 64/73) or QBC + TnS (87.7%, 64/73). TnS remains necessary for Plasmodium species identification and quantification. Adding sequentially TnS only on LAMP-positive samples did not decrease TnS + LAMP strategy sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In nonendemic countries, the currently recommended microscopy-based strategies seem unsatisfactory for malaria diagnosis considering RDT and LAMP performance, two rapid and sensitive assays that require limited training.

Poor Diagnostic Performance of a Species-Specific Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Platform for Malaria

Background

The objective of this study was to assess an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) platform for malaria parasite detection and identification on species level.

Methods

LAMP primers specific for the human Plasmodium spp., namely, P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae, and P. knowlesi, as well as genus-specific primers, were tested against a composite gold standard comprising microscopy from thick and thin blood films, commercial genus-specific Meridian illumigene Malaria LAMP, in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and commercial fast-track diagnostics (FTD) Malaria differentiation PCR.

Results

Of the 523 blood samples analyzed, the composite gold standard indicated 243 Plasmodium-species-DNA-containing samples (46.5%). Sensitivity and specificity of the analyzed genus- and species-specific LAMP primers were 71.0%–100.0% and 90.8%–100.0%, respectively. The influence of parasitemia was best documented for P. falciparum-specific LAMP with sensitivity values of 35.5% (22/62) for microscopically negative samples containing P. falciparum DNA, 50% (19/38) for parasitemia ≤50/μL, 84% (21/25) for parasitemia ≤500/μL, and 100% (92/92) for parasitemia >500/μL.

Conclusions

In our hands, performance characteristics of species-specific in-house LAMP for malaria lack reliability required for diagnostic laboratories. The use of the easy-to-apply technique for surveillance purposes may be considered.

Comparison of three commercial multiplex PCR assays for the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa

Although microscopic examination of stool samples remains the reference method for the diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections, these techniques are time-consuming and require operators who are experienced and well trained. Molecular biology seems to offer performances at least equivalent in terms of sensitivity and specificity for certain parasites. This study aimed to compare three multiplex PCR assays on 93 prospectively collected positive stools (prospective cohort) and a panel of 12 more Cryptosporidium-positive samples (Cryptosporidium panel). On the prospective cohort, the sensitivity was 89%, 64% and 41% for Giardia sp. detection for BD Max^TM, G-DiaPara^TM and RIDA^®GENE, respectively and 75%, 100% and 100% for C. parvum/hominis detection. The sensitivity of the RIDA^®GENE assay for all Cryptosporidium species was 100%, and for D. fragilis 71%. All the techniques obtained the same results for E. histolytica detection, with one positive sample. All species in the Cryptosporidium panel were identified by the RIDA^®GENE PCR. The BD Max^TM and G-DiaPara^TM assays detected only C. parvum/hominis with the exception of one positive sample for C. meleagridis. No assay showed satisfactory results for all parasites simultaneously, and the DNA extraction seems to be the critical step. More studies are needed to standardize this procedure.

Restriction enzyme digestion of host DNA enhances universal detection of parasitic pathogens in blood via targeted amplicon deep sequencing

BACKGROUND

Targeted amplicon deep sequencing (TADS) of the 16S rRNA gene is commonly used to explore and characterize bacterial microbiomes. Meanwhile, attempts to apply TADS to the detection and characterization of entire parasitic communities have been hampered since conserved regions of many conserved parasite genes, such as the 18S rRNA gene, are also conserved in their eukaryotic hosts. As a result, targeted amplification of 18S rRNA from clinical samples using universal primers frequently results in competitive priming and preferential amplification of host DNA. Here, we describe a novel method that employs a single pair of universal primers to capture all blood-borne parasites while reducing host 18S rRNA template and enhancing the amplification of parasite 18S rRNA for TADS. This was achieved using restriction enzymes to digest the 18S rRNA gene at cut sites present only in the host sequence prior to PCR amplification.

RESULTS

This method was validated against 16 species of blood-borne helminths and protozoa. Enzyme digestion prior to PCR enrichment and Illumina amplicon deep sequencing led to a substantial reduction in human reads and a corresponding 5- to 10-fold increase in parasite reads relative to undigested samples. This method allowed for discrimination of all common parasitic agents found in human blood, even in cases of multi-parasite infection, and markedly reduced the limit of detection in digested versus undigested samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The results herein provide a novel methodology for the reduction of host DNA prior to TADS and establish the validity of a next-generation sequencing-based platform for universal parasite detection.

Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: current research perspectives

Originally known to cause simian malaria, Plasmodium knowlesi is now known as the fifth human malaria species. Since the publishing of a report that largely focused on human knowlesi cases in Sarawak in 2004, many more human cases have been reported in nearly all of the countries in Southeast Asia and in travelers returning from these countries. The zoonotic nature of this infection hinders malaria elimination efforts. In order to grasp the current perspective of knowlesi malaria, this literature review explores the different aspects of the disease including risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and molecular and functional studies. Current studies do not provide sufficient data for an effective control program. Therefore, future direction for knowlesi research is highlighted here with a final aim of controlling, if not eliminating, the parasite.

Evaluation of automated loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) for routine malaria detection in blood samples of German travelers - A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

We assessed a commercial loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) platform for its reliability as a screening tool for malaria parasite detection.

METHODS

A total of 1000 blood samples from patients with suspected or confirmed malaria submitted to the German National Reference Center for Tropical Pathogens were subjected to LAMP using the Meridian illumigene Malaria platform. Results were compared with microscopy from thick and thin blood films in all cases. In case of discordant results between LAMP and microscopy (n = 60), confirmation testing was performed with real-time PCR. Persistence of circulating parasite DNA was analyzed by serial assessments of blood samples following malaria treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 1000 blood samples analyzed, 238 were positive for malaria parasites according to microscopy (n = 181/1000) or PCR (additional n = 57/60). LAMP demonstrated sensitivity of 98.7% (235/238), specificity of 99.6% (759/762), positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.7% (235/238) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.6% (759/762), respectively. For first slides of patients with malaria and for follow-up slides, sensitivity values were 99.1% (106/107) and 98.5% (129/131), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the Meridian illumigene Malaria platform is suitable for initial screening of patients suspected of clinical malaria.