Diagnosis and management of infected arthroplasty

Medical Malpractice Litigation Trends Following Primary Total Hip and Knee Joint Arthroplasty: An Updated Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is the most common procedure associated with malpractice claims within orthopaedic surgery. Although prior research has assessed prevalent causes and outcomes of TJA-related lawsuits before 2018, the dynamic healthcare environment demands regular re-evaluations. This study aimed to provide an updated analysis of the predominant causes and outcomes of TJA-related malpractice lawsuits and analyze the outcomes of subsequent appeals following initial jury verdicts.

METHODS

A legal database was queried for cases between 2018 and 2022 involving primary hip and knee TJA in the United States. Cases were listed as original rulings or appeals and reviewed for the alleged negligence, damages incurred, demographics, and verdicts. Appeals were further assessed for appellant details, preliminary judgment, and outcomes. The findings were compared to previous litigation data using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The final cohort comprised 59 cases: 33 (56%) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 26 (44%) total hip arthroplasty (THA). The TKA cases primarily cited pain (24%), while the THA cases cited nerve injuries (31%). Negligence largely stemmed from procedural error (47%), postsurgical error (27%), and failure to inform (14%). Case outcomes were in favor of the defense in 66% of cases. Overall, 90% of primary verdicts led to appeals, with 71% by the plaintiff. Initial rulings were upheld in 87% of plaintiff appeals, whereas 53% of defendant appeals retained the initial judgment.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary cause of litigation shifted from infection to ongoing/worsening pain in TKA cases over time. While nerve injury TKA cases have decreased, it remains the most cited damage after THA. Defense verdicts are common, but there is an increasing number of verdicts against defendants. Plaintiffs are more likely to appeal, but are less successful in appellate courts. These findings allow surgeons and policymakers to address emerging litigation trends in TJA to mitigate risks and improve the overall quality of TJA.

Finding the Optimal Screening Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serological markers are often used as screening tools to avoid unnecessary joint aspiration in cases with a low probability of infection. This study aimed to determine the utility of standard-of-care serological tests as a screening tool for PJI in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 502 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty between May 2017 and August 2021. A PJI was defined using a modified definition of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. Plasma D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. There were 82 patients undergoing reimplantation who were excluded. Additionally, 8 patients who had an inconclusive International Consensus Meeting score were also excluded. Of the 412 included patients, 317 (76.9%) underwent revision for aseptic failure, and 95 (23.1%) had PJI. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the diagnostic utility of each serological test. A pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was performed to determine whether the differences in areas under the curve (AUCs) between the tests were significant. Additional analyses were performed to find the threshold for each test that offered 100% sensitivity, allowing it to be the optimal screening test.

RESULTS

All 4 serological markers, D-dimer (AUC 0.860, sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 81.7%), CRP (AUC 0.862, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 70.0%), ESR (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 73.9%, specificity 85.2%), and fibrinogen (AUC 0.798, sensitivity 74.7%, specificity 75.4%), demonstrated comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI (all P > .05). When maximizing sensitivity to 100%, D-dimer demonstrated the highest specificity (AUC 0.860, specificity 40.2%), outperforming ESR (AUC 0.833, specificity 3.3%), fibrinogen (AUC 0.798, specificity 2.3%), and CRP (AUC 0.862, specificity 0%). A plasma D-dimer level of ≥ 244 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cutoff for use as a screening test.

CONCLUSIONS

Although plasma D-dimer demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy as CRP, ESR, and fibrinogen, it outperformed all 3 aforementioned serological markers when used as a screening test for PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Commercial Synovial Antigen Testing is Inferior to Traditional Culture for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite its limitations, a culture remains the "gold standard" for pathogen identification in patients who have periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, a synovial fluid antigen test has been introduced by a commercial entity. The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the accuracy of the antigen test in the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified 613 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty who had undergone preoperative synovial fluid analysis. A PJI was defined using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Patients who had an extended period (> 180 days) from aspiration to revision procedure (n = 62), those presenting within 90 days of their index arthroplasty procedure (n = 17), and patients who had an inconclusive ICM score (n = 8) were excluded. Using receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, we examined the utility of the microbial identification (MID) antigen test and any positive culture (either preoperative or intraoperative) in the diagnosis of PJI.

RESULTS

A total of 526 patients were included. Of these, 125 (23.8%) were ICM positive and 401 (76.2%) were ICM negative. Culture demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864, sensitivity of 75.2%, and specificity of 97.5%. On the other hand, the MID test exhibited an AUC of 0.802, sensitivity of 61.6%, and specificity of 98.8%. The AUC of culture was significantly higher than that of the MID test (P = .037). The MID test was positive in 41.9% of culture-negative PJI cases. We also observed a high rate of discordance (29.7%) when both culture and the MID test were positive in the ICM-positive group.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial fluid antigen testing does not provide additional clinical benefit when compared to traditional cultures for the diagnosis of PJI. The antigen test had low sensitivity in the diagnosis of PJI and a relatively high rate of discordance with culture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of unplanned second debridement, antibiotics and implant retention on long-term outcomes in knee exchange arthroplasty: Elevated risk of failure and reinfection

Purpose

This study investigates the outcomes of two-stage exchange arthroplasty (EA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following initial or unplanned repeat debridement antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed cases of knee arthroplasty infection treated with two-stage EA after DAIR, spanning from January 1994 to December 2010. A total of 138 patients were included, comprising 112 with initial DAIR and 26 with an unplanned second DAIR. Data on demographics, comorbidities, infection characteristics and causative organisms were analyzed. The primary outcome was implant failure or reinfection, observed over a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Results

The overall success rate for two-stage EA was 87% (119/138 patients). Factors identified for treatment failure included reinfection with the same pathogen for unplanned second DAIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35-4.38; p = 0.004), higher reinfection rates in patients undergoing EA after an unplanned second DAIR, especially with a prior history of PJI within 2 years (HR = 4.23; 95% CI = 2.39-5.31; p = 0.002), pre-first DAIR C-reactive protein (CRP) levels over 100 mg/dL (HR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.98-3.42; p = 0.003) and recurrence with the same pathogen (HR = 2.35; 95% CI = 1.32-4.24; p = 0.007). Additional factors such as male gender (HR = 3.92; 95% CI = 1.21-5.25; p = 0.007) and osteoporosis (T score < -2.5; HR = 3.27; 95% CI = 1.23-5.28; p = 0.005) were identified as risk factors for implant failure in all EA cases.

Conclusions

This study identifies key risk factors for worse knee EA outcomes following DAIR, including a pre-first DAIR CRP level over 100 mg/L, same pathogen recurrence, and PJI history within 2 years. It shows implant failure rates remain constant across EA cases, regardless of DAIR sequence, particularly with risk factors like male gender and severe osteoporosis (T score < -2.5). These results underscore the need for careful evaluation before an unplanned second DAIR, given its significant impact on EA success.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Investigating the translational value of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) models to determine the risk and severity of Staphylococcal biofilms

With the advent of antibiotic-eluting polymeric materials for targeting recalcitrant infections, using preclinical models to study biofilm is crucial for improving the treatment efficacy in periprosthetic joint infections. The stratification of risk and severity of infections is needed to develop an effective clinical dosing framework with better outcomes. Here, using in-vivo and in-vitro implant-associated infection models, we demonstrate that methicillin-sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA) have model-dependent distinct implant and peri-implant tissue colonization patterns. The maturity of biofilms and the location (implant vs tissue) were found to influence the antibiotic susceptibility evolution profiles of MSSA and MRSA and the models could capture the differing host-microbe interactions in vivo. Gene expression studies revealed the molecular heterogeneity of colonizing bacterial populations. The comparison and stratification of the risk and severity of infection across different preclinical models provided in this study can guide clinical dosing to effectively prevent or treat PJI.

Risk factors for peri-megaprosthetic joint infections in tumor surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Peri-megaprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in tumor surgery are complex and challenging complications that significantly impact the outcomes of the patients. The occurrence of PJI poses a substantial threat to the success of these operations. This review aims to identify and summarize the risk factors associated with PJI in tumor surgery with megaprosthetic reconstruction as well as to determine the overall risk of PJI in limb salvage surgery.

METHODS

A thorough examination of published literature, scrutinizing the incidence of PJI in tumor prostheses after limb salvage surgery was done. Research studies that documented the incidence of PJI in tumor patients who underwent limb salvage surgery, and explored the risk factors associated with the occurrence of PJI were deemed eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included in the analysis and underwent comprehensive examination. After the exploration of key parameters, several significant risk factors for PJI concerning the type of implant coating, surgical site characteristics, patient demographics, and procedural factors were recorded.

DISCUSSION

The findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach in managing tumor patients undergoing limb salvage surgery and megaprosthetic reconstruction, with emphasis on individualized risk assessments and individualized preventive strategies.

Is there sufficient evidence to support the use of antibiotic holiday just before the second stage of an infected total hip or knee arthroplasty revision surgery?

The practice of implementing an antibiotic holiday before the second stage of hip or knee arthroplasty is currently controversial due to limited evidence for this approach, as per the International Consensus Meeting 2018 on Musculoskeletal Infection. A greater understanding of this issue could augment the quality of Alrayes and Sukeik's mini-review (2023) on diagnosing, managing, and treating periprosthetic knee infections. However, a significant lack of literature exists concerning the optimal duration for the antibiotic holiday, calling for more research before establishing any clinical guidelines.

Clinical applications of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the identification of pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology to identify pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients suspected of having PJI between April 2020 and July 2023. The patients were categorized into PJI (46 patients) and non-PJI (19 patients) groups based on the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. Clinical data were collected, and both conventional bacterial culture and mNGS were performed. The diagnostic performance of the two methods was compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

mNGS exhibited a sensitivity of 89.13%, a specificity of 94.74%, a positive predictive value of 97.62%, a negative predictive value of 78.26%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90.77%. Compared to microbial culture, mNGS demonstrated superior diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining similar specificity. A total of 48 pathogens were successfully identified using mNGS, with Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Cutibacterium acnes being the most common infectious agents. Notably, mNGS was used to identify 17 potential pathogens in 14 culture-negative PJI samples, highlighting its ability to detect rare infectious agents, including Cutibacterium acnes (n = 5), Granulicatella adiacens (n = 1), Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (n = 1), and Coxiella burnetii (n = 1), among others, which are not detectable by routine culture methods. However, mNGS failed to detect the pathogen in 4 culture-positive PJI patients, indicating its limitations. Among the 46 PJI patients, 27 had positive culture and mNGS results. The results of mNGS were concordant with those of culture at the genus level in 6 patients with PJI and at the species level in 18 patients. Furthermore, the present study revealed a significantly greater proportion of Staphylococcus aureus in the sinus tract group (45.45%) than in the non-sinus tract group (14.29%), indicating the association of this pathogen with sinus formation in PJI (P = 0.03). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of polymicrobial infections between the sinus tract group (27.27%) and the non-sinus tract group (33.33%) (P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing can serve as a valuable screening tool in addition to traditional culture methods to improve diagnostic accuracy through optimized culture strategies.

Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) Are Predictors of Good Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of Lower Limbs: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that develops after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), whose incidence is expected to increase over the years. Traditionally, surgical treatment of PJI has been based on algorithms, where early infections are preferably treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and late infections with two-stage revision surgery. Two-stage revision is considered the "gold standard" for treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as it enables local delivery of antibiotics, maintenance of limb-length and mobility, and easier reimplantation. Many studies have attempted to identify potential predicting factors for early diagnosis of PJI, but its management remains challenging. In this observational retrospective study, we investigated the potential role of inflammatory blood markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI)) as prognostic factors in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted, collecting clinical data and laboratory parameters from patients submitted to prosthetic explantation (EP) for chronic PJI. Laboratory parameters (PCR, NLR, MLR, PLR, SIRI, SII, and AISI) were evaluated at the explantation time; at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery; and at reimplantation time. The correlation between laboratory parameters and surgery success was evaluated and defined as infection absence/resolution at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients with PJI were evaluated (62% males; average age 70 years, SD 12.14). Fifty-three patients with chronic PJI were included. Nine patients underwent DAIR revision surgery and chronic suppressive therapy; two patients died. Nineteen patients completed the two-stage revision process (prosthetic removal, spacer placement, and subsequent replanting). Among them, none showed signs of reinfection or persistence of infection at the last available follow-up. The other twenty-three patients did not replant due to persistent infection: among them, some (the most) underwent spacer retention; others (fewer in number) were submitted to resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis (Girdlestone technique) or chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy; the remaining were, over time, lost to follow-up. Of the patients who concluded the two-stage revision, the ones with high SIRI values (mean 3.08 SD 1.7 and p-value 0.04) and MLR values (mean 0.4 SD 0.2 and p-value 0.02) at the explantation time were associated with a higher probability of infection resolution. Moreover, higher variation in the SIRI and PCR, also defined, respectively, as delta-SIRI (mean -2.3 SD 1.8 and p-value 0.03) and delta-PCR (mean -46 SD 35.7 and p-value 0.03), were associated with favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that, in patients with PJI undergoing EP, the SIRI and MLR values and delta-SIRI and delta-PCR values could be predictive of a favorable outcome. The evaluation of these laboratory indices, especially their determination at 4 weeks after removal, could therefore help to determine which patients could be successfully replanted and to identify the best time to replant. More studies analyzing a wider cohort of patients with chronic PJI are needed to validate the promising results of this study.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the utility of NLR in the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception up to 2022 and evaluated the quality of the included literature.

RESULTS

Based on the 12 eligible studies, NLR levels were significantly higher in patients who had PJI compared to those who had aseptic loosening (standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.05, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.71 to 1.40, P < .001). In the subgroup analysis according to type of PJI, NLR levels were significantly higher in patients who had either acute (SMD = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.05 to 2.03, P < .001) or chronic PJI (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.61, P < .001), compared to those who had aseptic loosening. According to type of arthroplasty, NLR levels were significantly higher in patients who had either total knee arthroplasty (SMD = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.48 to 2.13, P < .001) or total hip arthroplasty (SMD = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.54 to 1.98, P < .001) compared to aseptic loosening. The pooled sensitivity of the 12 studies was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79), and the pooled specificity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.78). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of NLR were 2.94 (95% CI = 2.44 to 3.54), 0.35 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.46), and 8.26 (95% CI = 5.42 to 12.58), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that NLR is a reliable marker in the diagnosis of PJI.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of extended duration cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation for treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections

Effective treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections (IAIs) remains a clinical challenge. The in vitro and in vivo studies presented herein evaluated the antimicrobial effects of applying cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation (CVCES) to titanium implants inoculated with preformed bacterial biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The in vitro studies showed that combining vancomycin therapy (500 µg/mL) with application of CVCES at -1.75 V (all voltages are with respect to Ag/AgCl unless otherwise stated) for 24 h resulted in 99.98% reduction in the coupon-associated MRSA colony-forming units (CFUs) (3.38 × 103 vs. 2.14 × 107 CFU/mL, p < 0.001) and a 99.97% reduction in the planktonic CFU (4.04 × 104 vs. 1.26 × 108 CFU/mL, p < 0.001) as compared with the no treatment control samples. The in vivo studies utilized a rodent model of MRSA IAIs and showed a combination of vancomycin therapy (150 mg/kg twice daily) with CVCES of -1.75 V for 24 h had significant reductions in the implant associated CFU (1.42 × 101 vs. 1.2 × 106 CFU/mL, p < 0.003) and bone CFU (5.29 × 101 vs. 4.48 × 106 CFU/mL, p < 0.003) as compared with the untreated control animals. Importantly, the combined 24 h CVCES and antibiotic treatments resulted in no implant-associated MRSA CFU enumerated in 83% of the animals (five out of six animals) and no bone-associated MRSA CFU enumerated in 50% of the animals (three out of six animals). Overall, the outcomes of this study have shown that extended duration CVCES therapy is an effective adjunctive therapy to eradicate IAIs.

Development of droplet digital PCR-based detection of bacterial pathogens in prosthetic joint infection: a preliminary study using a synthesized model plasmid

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be diagnosed to characterize the microorganisms constituting a biofilm, which is an essential procedure for proper treatment. The gold standard method for detecting and identifying the causative microorganism is culture of microorganisms from patients-derived sample.; however, this method takes a long time and has low sensitivity. To compensate for these limitations, identification methods based on real-time PCR (RT-PCR) have been widely used. However, RT-PCR also has limitations, including low sensitivity and the requirement of a standard curve for quantification. Therefore, to prevent significant proliferation of pathogenic bacteria, it is important to detect a limited number of infectious bacteria during early stages of PJI. In the present study, we developed droplet digital PCR-based detection of bacterial pathogens in PJI. And we evaluated the analytical performance of the assay using a model plasmid, based on the 16S ribosomal DNA sequence of target bacteria commonly found in PJI. We also prepared genomic DNA extracted from E. coli, S. aureus, and S. epidermidis to test whether ddPCR provides better sensitivity and quantification of the target sequences. ddPCR detected 400 attograms of target DNA, which was more than 10 times less than that detected by real-time PCR using synthesized plasmid. In addition, ddPCR detected target regions from genomic DNA of 50 femtograms for E. coli, 70 femtograms for S. epidermidis, and 90 femtograms for S. aureus. The results indicate that ddPCR has the potential to decrease the microbial detection limit and provide precise detection, signifying its effectiveness for early PJI.

Plasma D-Dimer Is a Promising Marker to Guide Timing of Reimplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the preferred surgical treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection. Currently, there is no single reliable marker to determine the optimal timing for reimplantation. The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the diagnostic utility of plasma D-dimer and other serological markers in predicting successful control of infection following reimplantation.

METHODS

This study enrolled 136 patients undergoing reimplantation arthroplasty between November 2016 and December 2020. Strict inclusion criteria were applied including the need for a two-week "antibiotic holiday" prior to reimplantation. A total of 114 patients were included in the final analysis. Plasma D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. Treatment success was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society Outcome-Reporting Tool. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the prognostic accuracy of each biomarker in predicting failure following reimplantation at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Treatment failure occurred in 33 patients (28.9%) at a mean follow-up of 3.2 years (range, 1.0 to 5.7). Median plasma D-dimer was significantly higher in the treatment failure group (1,604 versus 631 ng/mL, P < .001), whereas median CRP, ESR, and fibrinogen were not significantly different between the success and failure groups. Plasma D-dimer demonstrated the best diagnostic utility (area under the curve [AUC] 0.724, sensitivity 51.5%, specificity 92.6%), outperforming ESR (AUC 0.565, sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 22.5%), CRP (AUC 0.541, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 26.3%), and fibrinogen (AUC 0.485, sensitivity 30.4%, specificity 80.0%). Plasma D-dimer level of ≥1,604 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cutoff that predicted failure following reimplantation.

CONCLUSION

Plasma D-dimer was superior to serum ESR, CRP, and fibrinogen in predicting failure after the second stage of a two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. Based on the findings of this prospective study, plasma D-dimer may be a promising marker in assessing the control of infection in patients undergoing reimplantation surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Advances in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections

A significant number of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are culture-negative and/or misinterpreted as aseptic failures in spite of the correct implementation of diagnostic culture techniques, such as tissue sample processing in a bead mill, prolonged incubation time, or sonication of removed implants. Misinterpretation may lead to unnecessary surgery and needless antimicrobial treatment. The diagnostic value of non-culture techniques has been investigated in synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissues, and sonication fluid. Different feasible improvements, such as real-time technology, automated systems and commercial kits are now available to support microbiologists. In this review, we describe non-culture techniques based on nucleic acid amplification and sequencing methods. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a frequently used technique in most microbiology laboratories which allows the detection of a nucleic acid fragment by sequence amplification. Different PCR types can be used to diagnose PJI, each one requiring the selection of appropriate primers. Henceforward, thanks to the reduced cost of sequencing and the availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS), it will be possible to identify the whole pathogen genome sequence and, additionally, to detect all the pathogen sequences present in the joint. Although these new techniques have proved helpful, strict conditions need to be observed in order to detect fastidious microorganisms and rule out contaminants. Specialized microbiologists should assist clinicians in interpreting the result of the analyses at interdisciplinary meetings. New technologies will gradually be made available to improve the etiologic diagnoses of PJI, which will remain an important cornerstone of treatment. Strong collaboration among all specialists involved is essential for the correct diagnosis of PJI.

Plasma D-Dimer Is Noninferior to Serum C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serological markers are often used as screening tools in the workup of patients with suspected PJI. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of plasma D-dimer for PJI in a variety of clinical scenarios.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 502 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty. PJI was defined per a modified version of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Plasma D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the utility of each biomarker in the diagnosis of PJI. Pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was performed to determine whether the differences in areas under the curve (AUCs) between the markers were significant.

RESULTS

Of the 412 patients included, 317 (76.9%) did not have an infection (aseptic group) and 95 (23.1%) had an infection (PJI group). All 4 serological markers, D-dimer (AUC, 0.860; sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 81.7%), CRP (AUC, 0.862; sensitivity, 90.4%; specificity, 70.0%), ESR (AUC, 0.833; sensitivity, 73.9%; specificity, 85.2%), and fibrinogen (AUC, 0.798; sensitivity, 74.7%; specificity, 75.4%), demonstrated comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI (all p > 0.05). When examining the performance of the different inflammatory markers in diagnosing infection caused by indolent organisms, D-dimer demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 93.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that plasma D-dimer was noninferior to serum CRP and ESR in the diagnosis of PJI and may be a useful adjunct when screening patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Time to Positivity of Cultures Obtained for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Despite its well-established limitations, culture remains the gold standard for microbial identification in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there are no benchmarks for the time to positivity (TTP) on culture for specific microorganisms. This study aimed to determine the TTP for pathogens commonly encountered in PJI.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study reviewed prospectively maintained institutional PJI databases to identify patients who underwent hip or knee revision arthroplasty from 2017 to 2021 at 2 tertiary centers in the United States and Germany. Only patients who met the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI and had a positive intraoperative culture were included. TTP on culture media was recorded for each sample taken intraoperatively. The median TTP was compared among different microbial species and different specimen types. Data are presented either as the mean and the standard deviation or as the median and the interquartile range (IQR).

RESULTS

A total of 536 ICM-positive patients with positive cultures were included. The mean number of positive cultures per patient was 3.9 ± 2.6. The median TTP, in days, for all positive cultures was 3.3 (IQR, 1.9 to 5.4). Overall, gram-negative organisms (TTP, 1.99 [1.1 to 4.1]; n = 225) grew significantly faster on culture compared with gram-positive organisms (TTP, 3.33 [1.9 to 5.8]; n = 1,774). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (TTP, 1.42 [1.0 to 2.8]; n = 85) had the fastest TTP, followed by gram-negative rods (TTP, 1.92 [1.0 to 3.9]; n = 163), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (TTP, 1.95 [1.1 to 3.3] n = 393), Streptococcus species (TTP, 2.92 [1.2 to 4.3]; n = 230), Staphylococcus epidermidis (TTP, 4.20 [2.4 to 5.5]; n = 555), Candida species (TTP, 5.30 [3.1 to 10]; n = 63), and Cutibacterium acnes (TTP, 6.97 [5.9 to 8.2]; n = 197). When evaluating the median TTP according to specimen type, synovial fluid (TTP, 1.97 [1.1 to 3.1]; n = 112) exhibited the shortest TTP, followed by soft tissue (TTP, 3.17 [1.4 to 5.3]; n = 1,199) and bone (TTP, 4.16 [2.3 to 5.9]; n = 782).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the TTP of common microorganisms that are known to cause PJI. Increased awareness of these data may help to guide the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and to predict treatment outcomes in the future. Nonetheless, additional studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these benchmarks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Synovial C-Reactive Protein is a Useful Adjunct for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic utility of synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) has been debated for a while. Existing studies are limited by small sample sizes and using outdated criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Furthermore, the relationship between synovial and serum CRP has rarely been investigated in the setting of PJI. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of synovial CRP and to assess its relationship with serum CRP and other common biomarkers.

METHODS

We reviewed 621 patients who underwent evaluation for PJI prior to revision arthroplasty from 2014 to 2021. Biomarkers, including serum CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, synovial CRP, polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage, white blood cell count, and alpha-defensin, were evaluated using the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 194 patients had a PJI; 394 were considered aseptic failures and 33 were inconclusive. Synovial CRP showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951 (95% CI, 0.932-0.970) with 74.2% sensitivity and 98.0% specificity, whereas, serum CRP had an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI, 0.903-0.949) with 83.5% sensitivity and 88.3% specificity. There was a good correlation between synovial and serum CRP (R = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.604-0.785). The combination of serum and synovial CRP yielded a significantly higher AUC than that obtained when using serum CRP alone (AUC 0.964 versus 0.926, P = .016).

CONCLUSION

Synovial CRP demonstrated excellent accuracy when used to determine the presence of PJI. There was a good correlation between serum and synovial CRP levels in revision arthroplasty patients and the combined use of serum and synovial CRP proved to be more accurate than the serum test alone. These findings support the use of synovial CRP as an adjunct in the workup of PJI.

Infectious disease specialists and teamwork strategies worldwide: the World Association against Infection in Orthopedics and Trauma (WAIOT) and SICOT continue to cooperate in fighting musculoskeletal infections

Bone and joint infections are associated with a devastating global burden. The successful treatment of these infections requires a multidisciplinary approach between orthopedic surgeons and experts of different disciplines. This multidisciplinary approach has gained ground over the past decades in modern infection units as a more effective treatment strategy, yielding better outcomes regarding infection eradication rates, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of treatments. Additionally, preventing and managing musculoskeletal infections requires strong connections between medical associations, biological laboratories, and the pharmaceutical industry worldwide. In this context, SICOT and World Association against Infection in Orthopaedics and Trauma (WAIOT) relationships have been increasing. The present editorial article discusses the multidisciplinary approach for managing bone and joint infections worldwide, explores the controversies in practices in terms of training, area of expertise, and extent of clinical involvement, and emphasizes the role of societies in research, prevention and management of musculoskeletal infections. The purpose is to acknowledge what orthopedics can obtain from specialists dealing with bone and joint infections and to consolidate their practice to provide the best care for orthopedic patients.