Molecular analysis of synchronous and metachronous tumors of the lung: impact on management and prognosis

Pathologic Assessment and Staging of Multiple Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: A Paradigm Shift with the Emerging Role of Molecular Methods

Non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) commonly present as 2 or more separate tumors. Biologically, this encompasses 2 distinct processes: separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs), representing independently arising tumors, and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs), representing intrapulmonary spread of a single tumor. The advent of computed tomography imaging has substantially increased the detection of multifocal NSCLCs. The strategies and approaches for distinguishing between SPLCs and IPMs have evolved significantly over the years. Recently, genomic sequencing of somatic mutations has been widely adopted to identify targetable alterations in NSCLC. These molecular techniques have enabled pathologists to reliably discern clonal relationships among multiple NSCLCs in clinical practice. However, a standardized approach to evaluating and staging multiple NSCLCs using molecular methods is still lacking. Here, we reviewed the historical context and provided an update on the growing applications of genomic testing as a clinically relevant benchmark for determining clonal relationships in multiple NSCLCs, a practice we have designated "comparative molecular profiling." We examined the strengths and limitations of the morphology-based distinction of SPLCs vs IPMs and highlighted pivotal clinical and pathologic insights that have emerged from studying multiple NSCLCs using genomic approaches as a gold standard. Lastly, we suggest a practical approach for evaluating multiple NSCLCs in the clinical setting, considering the varying availability of molecular techniques.

Towards the molecular era of discriminating multiple lung cancers

In the era of histopathology-based diagnosis, the discrimination between multiple lung cancers (MLCs) poses significant uncertainties and has thus become a clinical dilemma. However, recent significant advances and increased application of molecular technologies in clonal relatedness assessment have led to more precision in distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPMs). This review summarizes recent advances in the molecular identification of MLCs and compares various methods based on somatic mutations, chromosome alterations, microRNAs, and tumor microenvironment markers. The paper also discusses current challenges at the forefront of genomics-based discrimination, including the selection of detection technology, application of next-generation sequencing, and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). In summary, this paper highlights an entrance into the primary stage of molecule-based diagnostics.

Evaluating statistical approaches to define clonal origin of tumours using bulk DNA sequencing: context is everything

Clonal analysis of tumour sequencing data enables the evaluation of the relationship of histologically distinct synchronous lesions, such as co-existing benign areas, and temporally distinct tumours, such as primary-recurrence comparisons. In this review, we summarise statistical approaches that are commonly employed to define tumour clonal relatedness using data from bulk DNA technologies. We discuss approaches using total copy number, allele-specific copy number and mutation data, and the relative genomic resolution required for analysis and summarise some of the current tools for inferring clonal relationships. We argue that the impact of the biological context is critical in selecting any particular approach, such as the relative genomic complexity of the lesions being compared, and we recommend considering this context before employing any method to a new dataset.

The Role of Whole Exome Sequencing in Distinguishing Primary and Secondary Lung Cancers

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that presents with multiple lung tumors (MLTs) poses a challenge to accurate staging and prognosis. MLTs that arise as clonally related secondary metastases from a common primary are higher stage and often require adjuvant chemotherapy or may in fact be incurable stage IV lesions. Conversely, MLTs that represent distinct primaries have a better prognosis and may be overtreated if inappropriately classified as related secondaries. Historically, pathologic and radiographic criteria were used to distinguish between primary and secondary MLTs; however, the advent of genomic profiling has demonstrated limitations to these historic classification systems. In this review, we discuss the use of molecular profiling to distinguish between primary and secondary lung cancers, with a focus on the insights gleaned from whole exome sequencing (WES) analyses. While WES is not yet feasible in routine clinical practice, WES studies have helped elucidate the clonal relationship between primary and secondary lung cancers and provide important context for the application of targeted sequencing panel-based analyses.

A multidisciplinary approach for the differential diagnosis between multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas and intrapulmonary metastases

PURPOSE

The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases has a significant impact on tumor staging and therapeutic choices. Several criteria have been proposed to solve this diagnostic issue, but a definitive consensus is still missing. We tested the efficacy of a combined clinical, histopathological and molecular ("real world") approach for the correct classification of multiple lung tumors in a selected cohort of patients.

METHODS

24 multiple lung tumors with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma from 10 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological, pathological and clinical information, including follow-up, were integrated with molecular profiling via a routine multigene panel sequencing.

RESULTS

Comprehensive histologic assessment revealed readily distinguishable histologic patterns between multiple tumors suggesting unrelated lesions in 7 cases, in agreement with clinical, radiological and molecular data, thus leading to final diagnosis of MPLCs. In the remaining 3 cases, the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and intrapulmonary metastases was challenging, since the histologic features of the lesions were similar or identical. The final interpretation (2 MPLCs and 1 most likely intrapulmonary metastases) was reached thanks to the integration of all available data, and was confirmed by follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach including a routinely affordable multigene panel sequencing is a useful tool to discriminate MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastases in multiple lung nodules sharing the adenocarcinoma histotype.

Unusual metachronous lung adenocarcinomas harboring EGFR L858R/T790M mutations: A case report

Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) is defined as two or more primary lung cancers occurring in the same patient and can be classified as synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) and metachronous multiple primary lung cancer (mMPLC). Due to various clinicopathological characteristics and genetic features, MPLC is increasingly encountered in clinical practice. The distinction between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastasis (IM) is of great importance to clinical treatment and prognosis. However, there are currently no golden diagnostic criteria for MPLC due to tumor heterogeneity. Here, we report the case of a patient with four lung cancers (tumor 1, named T1, in the right middle lobe seven years earlier; tumor 2, named T2, in the left lower lobe; tumor 3 and tumor 4, named T3 and T4, in the left upper lobe) and two tumors (T1 and T2) which shared the mutation in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R/T790M based on targeted multigene sequencing, which indicate that these two tumors might have originated from a common ancestor. However, based on previously published guidelines, these three tumors (T2T4) were diagnosed as mMPLC.

Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing Unambiguously Distinguishes Separate Primary Lung Carcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases: Comparison with Standard Histopathologic Approach

PURPOSE

In patients with >1 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is a common diagnostic dilemma with critical staging implications. Here, we compared the performance of comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) with standard histopathologic approaches for distinguishing NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We queried 4,119 NSCLCs analyzed by 341-468 gene MSK-IMPACT NGS assay for patients with >1 surgically resected tumor profiled by NGS. Tumor relatedness predicted by prospective histopathologic assessment was contrasted with comparative genomic profiling by subsequent NGS.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with NGS performed on >1 NSCLCs were identified, yielding 76 tumor pairs. NGS classified tumor pairs into 51 definite SPLCs (median, 14; up to 72 unique somatic mutations per pair), and 25 IPMs (24 definite, one high probability; median, 5; up to 16 shared somatic mutations per pair). Prospective histologic prediction was discordant with NGS in 17 cases (22%), particularly in the prediction of IPMs (44% discordant). Retrospective review highlighted several histologic challenges, including morphologic progression in some IPMs. We subsampled MSK-IMPACT data to model the performance of less comprehensive assays, and identified several clinicopathologic differences between NGS-defined tumor pairs, including increased risk of subsequent recurrence for IPMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive NGS allows unambiguous delineation of clonal relationship among NSCLCs. In comparison, standard histopathologic approach is adequate in most cases, but has notable limitations in the recognition of IPMs. Our results support the adoption of broad panel NGS to supplement histology for robust discrimination of NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

Using Genomics to Differentiate Multiple Primaries From Metastatic Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Genomic technologies present a promising mechanism of resolving the clinical dilemma of distinguishing independent primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases in NSCLC. We evaluated the utility of discordant mapping somatic junctions from chromosomal rearrangements in diagnosing metastatic disease compared to the current standard histologic review.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mate-pair sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 76 distinct tumors from 37 cases of multiple lung cancers. Discordant mapping junctions and chromosomal copy levels were assessed for each tumor. Blood-derived DNA was available on 22 of these cases for germline assessments. A lung cancer next-generation sequencing panel was additionally performed on tumor pairs from 17 patients.

RESULTS

Whereas mate-pair sequencing was able to classify lineage in all tumor pairs, histologic review appeared to misclassify lineage in 9 of 33 (27%) same-histology tumor pair comparisons. Based on disagreement between the reviewing pathologists, histopathologic lineage was classified as indeterminate in seven cases. In two cases where pathologists agreed on a metastatic call, no shared junctions were found suggesting independent primaries. Although germline junctions passing algorithmic filters were common, on average less than three were present and all had predictable structures of small focal rearrangements or transposons. Evaluation of shared chromosomal copy changes and driver mutations through a lung cancer next-generation sequencing panel, while informative, were nondefinitive in calling lineage in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The highly unique nature and prevalence of chromosomal rearrangement in lung cancers provide a useful and definitive technique for calling lineage in multifocal lung cancer.

Multiple primary lung cancer: a rising challenge

With the use of high-resolution chest imaging system and lung cancer screening program, patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are becoming a growing population in clinical practice worldwide. The diagnostic criteria for MPLCs has been established and modified by three major lung cancer research institutes. However, due to the fact that the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and a recurrence, metastatic, or satellite lesion arising from the original lesion remains ambiguous and confusing, there is still insufficient evidence to support a uniform guideline. Newly developed molecular and genomic methods have the potential to better define the relationship among multiple lesions and bring the possibility of targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the first choice for the treatment of MPLCs and detailed strategy should be carefully planned taking characteristics of the tumor and status of patients into consideration. For those who are intolerant to surgery, a new technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now an optional therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, multiple GGOs are unique MPLCs that need special attentions in the clinical practice.

[Clinical and Prognosic Anylasis of 30 Cases with Double Primary Lung Cancer]

背景与目的

多原发肺癌（multiple primary lung cancer, MPLC）是一种临床中较为少见的肺癌类型，双原发肺癌（double primary lung cancer, DPLC）是其中最常见的一种，近年来由于诊疗手段的进步检出率逐渐升高。本研究总结分析了30例DPLC患者的临床资料，以期为DPLC的诊疗提供理论依据。

方法

回顾郑州大学附属肿瘤医院2010年1月-2015年12月收治的30例DPLC患者的临床资料，对临床特征及预后相关因素进行分析。

结果

30例中，同时性双原发癌（synchronous DPLC, sDPLC）占3例（3/30, 10%），异时性双原发癌（metachronous DPLC, mDPLC）占27例（27/30, 90.0%）。病灶好发于右肺上叶（20/60, 33.3%），病理类型以腺癌（25/60, 41.7%）为主，病理类型相同者（17/30, 56.7%）多于不同者（13/30, 43.3%），病理类型相同者以腺-腺（10/16, 62.5%）最常见。生存分析显示淋巴结转移（HR=4.349, 95%CI: 1.435-13.178, P=0.009）和重度吸烟史（HR=2.996, 95%CI: 1.089-8.240, P=0.034）是DPLC的不良预后因素。

结论

DPLC好发于右肺上叶，病理类型以腺癌为主，早期诊断、积极的治疗和严格的戒烟策略有望改善其预后。

Histopathologic and molecular approach to staging of multiple lung nodules

Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancers from intrapulmonary metastases in patients with synchronous multifocal lung adenocarcinomas can be challenging. The most recent 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (AJCC staging manual) distinguishes four disease patterns in patients with multiple lung nodules: (I) two or more distinct and histologically different masses (considered unrelated and staged as individual cancers); (II) multiple ground-glass or part-solid nodules, histologically of with lepidic growth pattern (considered separate tumors, T staged based on highest T stage lesion); (III) patchy areas of ground-glass and consolidations, histologically often invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (considered single tumor with diffuse "pneumonic-type" involvement); and (IV) separate nodules with the same histologic features based on comprehensive histologic subtyping (considered intrapulmonary metastases). Histologic and molecular features, in conjunction with clinical and radiological information, can all be tools to assist with staging of multiple nodules. Histologic features of adenocarcinomas are best characterized using comprehensive histologic subtyping (percentage of lepidic, acinar, solid, papillary and micropapillary pattern). Genomic alterations are commonly assessed using fluorescence in-situ hybridization and next generation sequencing (NGS). The AJCC considers exactly matching breakpoints by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) as the only evidence for intrapulmonary metastases, and clearly different histologic types or subtypes as the only evidence for separate primary tumors. Similar histologic subtypes or the same biomarker pattern are considered merely relative arguments in favor of a single tumor source. When assessing multifocal lung cancer, pathologists should consider, and carefully weigh the importance of, molecular testing results in addition to the tumor's histologic features. For many cases encountered in routine clinical practice, absolute certainty cannot be reached as to whether they represent multiple primary cancers or intrapulmonary metastases. Classification of difficult cases often benefits from multidisciplinary discussion.

Next-Generation Sequencing: A Novel Approach to Distinguish Multifocal Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas from Intrapulmonary Metastases

Distinguishing between multiple lung primary tumors and intrapulmonary metastases is imperative for accurate staging. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria are routinely used for this purpose but can yield equivocal conclusions. This study evaluated whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the 50-gene AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel version 2 can help facilitate this distinction. NGS was performed on known primary-metastatic pairs (8 patients) and multiple lung adenocarcinomas (11 patients). Primary-metastatic pairs had high mutational concordance. Seven pairs shared mutations, and 1 was concordant for having no mutations. Driver mutations in KRAS (n = 4), EGFR (n = 2), and BRAF (n = 1) were always concordant. Multiple lung tumors from 3 patients were completely concordant and predicted by NGS to be intrapulmonary metastases, whereas 8 had completely discordant mutations and were predicted to be independent primary tumors. The NGS prediction correlated with the AJCC (eighth edition) prediction in all patients for whom the latter was unequivocal (8 of 11). Furthermore, it separated patients by overall survival. Patients with predicted multiple independent primary tumors by NGS had better survival than those with distant metastases (P = 0.016, log-rank test), whereas those with predicted intrapulmonary metastases had no difference (P = 0.527). With further validation, the 50-gene panel has the potential to serve as an adjunct to the AJCC criteria.

Triple synchronous primary lung cancer: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Multiple primary lung cancer may present in synchronous or metachronous form. Synchronous multiple primary lung cancer is defined as multiple lung lesions that develop at the same time, whereas metachronous multiple primary lung cancer describes multiple lung lesions that develop at different times, typically following treatment of the primary lung cancer. Patients with previously treated lung cancer are at risk for developing metachronous lung cancer, but with the success of computed tomography and positron emission tomography, the ability to detect both synchronous and metachronous lung cancer has increased.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 63-year-old Hispanic man who came to our hospital for evaluation of chest pain, dry cough, and weight loss. He had recently been diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in the right upper lobe, with a poorly differentiated carcinoma favoring squamous cell cancer based on bronchoalveolar lavage of the right lower lobe for which treatment was started. Later, bronchoscopy incidentally revealed the patient to have an endobronchial lesion that turned out to be mixed small and large cell neuroendocrine lung cancer. Our patient had triple synchronous primary lung cancers that histologically were variant primary cancers.

Conclusions

Triple synchronous primary lung cancer management continues to be a challenge. Our patient’s case suggests that multiple primary lung cancers may still occur at a greater rate than can be detected by high-resolution computed tomography.

Crizotinib Response in a Late Relapse of ALK-positive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer. To date, few reports have been provided related to ALK-rearranged late recurrence and sensitivity to the treatment with specific ALK inhibitors. We report a case of a 35-year-old man who underwent a right lower lobe lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma, and treated with the platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. After 10 healthy years, he developed a lung nodule in the same site as the previous. Cytopathologic diagnosis was lung adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, the pulmonary nodule was considered a late recurrence in relation to the lymph node involvement, the same histotype and the site, ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization test and epidermal growth factor receptor analysis were performed on the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of the previous resected tumor, because of inadequacity cytologic sample. Being positive for ALK rearrangement, the patient was treated with crizotinib with a good response. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first case of a late relapse of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma sensitive to crizotinib in the literature.

[Research Progress in Diagnosis and Management Strategies of Multiple Primary Lung Cancer]

原发肺癌（multiple primary lung cancer, MPLC）的发病率呈逐年上升趋势，但关于MPLC的发病机制、诊断、鉴别诊断和临床处理策略仍存在诸多争议。本综述将对目前关于MPLC的发病机制、诊断标准、鉴别诊断和处理策略方面的研究进展做一个回顾，旨在为该病的诊疗提供理论基础。

Utility of Genomic Analysis in Differentiating Synchronous and Metachronous Lung Adenocarcinomas from Primary Adenocarcinomas with Intrapulmonary Metastasis

Distinguishing synchronous and metachronous primary lung adenocarcinomas from adenocarcinomas with intrapulmonary metastasis is essential for optimal patient management. In this study, multiple lung adenocarcinomas occurring in the same patient were evaluated using comprehensive histopathologic evaluation supplemented with molecular analysis. The cohort included 18 patients with a total of 52 lung adenocarcinomas. Eleven patients had a new diagnosis of multiple adenocarcinomas in the same lobe (n = 5) or different lobe (n = 6). Seven patients had a history of lung cancer and developed multiple new tumors. The final diagnosis was made in resection specimens (n = 49), fine needle aspiration (n = 2), and biopsy (n = 1). Adenocarcinomas were non‐mucinous, and histopathologic comparison of tumors was performed. All tumors save for one were subjected to ALK gene rearrangement testing and targeted Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Using clinical, radiologic, and morphologic features, a confident conclusion favoring synchronous/metachronous or metastatic disease was made in 65% of patients. Cases that proved challenging included ones with more than three tumors showing overlapping growth patterns and lacking a predominant lepidic component. Genomic signatures unique to each tumor were helpful in determining the relationship of multiple carcinomas in 72% of patients. Collectively, morphologic and genomic data proved to be of greater value and achieved a conclusive diagnosis in 94% of patients. Assessment of the genomic profiles of multiple lung adenocarcinomas complements the histological findings, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of synchronous, metachronous, and metastatic lesions in most patients, thereby improving staging accuracy. Targeted NGS can identify genetic alterations with therapeutic implications.

Lung Carcinoma Staging Update

Context.—

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Committee has prospectively created an international lung cancer database that was used to address many lung cancer staging questions, such as tumor size, nodal status, and metastatic disease. The proposed changes for the upcoming 8th edition of the cancer staging manual were based on survival data and better prognostic stratification of patients with lung cancer.

Objectives.—

To review published recommendations for the revision of lung carcinoma TNM staging and to address potential challenges in pathologic staging.

Data Source.—

PubMed available articles by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Committee were reviewed.

Conclusions.—

The TNM system remains the best prognosticator of lung cancer outcome. The recommendations are established on new prospective data analysis and reflect the improvements in prognostic separation of patients with lung cancer based on a multidisciplinary approach.

Does Lymph Node Metastasis Have a Negative Prognostic Impact in Patients with NSCLC and M1a Disease?

OBJECTIVES

Patients with NSCLC with M1a disease regardless of lymph node status were categorized as stage IV. This study aims to investigate whether the N descriptors in M1a patients could provide clinical information.

METHODS

Overall, 39,731 patients with NSCLC with M1a disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2005-2012. Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was compared among M1a patients stratified by N stage. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to evaluate the prognostic factors. Statistical analyses were performed in all subgroups.

RESULTS

M1a patients without lymph node involvement had the best LCSS, followed by patients with N1 disease; no difference in LCSS was observed between N2 and N3 disease (N0 versus N1, p < 0.001; N1 versus N2, p < 0.001; and N2 versus N3, p = 0.478). Similarly, this trend was observed when patients were subdivided into two temporal cohorts (2005-2008 and 2009-2012) and also when M1a disease was subdivided into contralateral pulmonary nodules and pleural dissemination (malignant pleural effusion [or pericardial effusion] and pleural nodules). In addition, a difference in LCSS between N2 and N3 disease was observed in patients with malignant pleural nodules (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic factor for M1a patients, and this result was also noticed in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide preliminary evidence that lymph node stage may have clinical significance among patients with NSCLC with M1a disease, adding prognostic information.

Morphological and molecular approach to synchronous non-small cell lung carcinomas: impact on staging

Distinction between multiple primary cancers and intrapulmonary metastases in patients with synchronous multifocal lung cancer can be challenging. Histological and genotypic assessment of multifocal lung tumors have been suggested to influence the staging. The aim of this study was to determine the role of morphology and genotype in staging of surgically treated multifocal non-small cell lung carcinoma. Synchronous lung cancers from 60 patients (42 with adenocarcinoma and 18 with squamous cell carcinoma), clinically considered to represent intrapulmonary metastases, were histologically subtyped according to the 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors and subjected to genotypic analysis (KRAS, EGFR, BRAF, PIK3CA, ALK, MET and ROS1 in adenocarcinoma and PIK3CA and p16 in squamous cell carcinoma). Concordance between clinical criteria and histological subtyping was identified in about 50% of cases (P<0.0001). Genotypically, 44% of adenocarcinomas and 60% of squamous cell carcinomas with identified molecular alterations were considered to be intrapulmonary metastases. Concordance between histological and molecular staging was observed in 89% of adenocarcinomas and 56% of squamous cell carcinomas. Univariate survival analyses failed to demonstrate significant differences in overall or cancer-specific survival in patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas restaged according to histology and/or molecular profile. Lymph node metastases (N1/N2 vs N0) (P=0.03) and age >65 years (P=0.05) were associated with shorter overall survival. In addition, squamous cell carcinomas with p16 deletion showed shorter overall survival when compared with squamous cell carcinomas without p16 deletion (P=0.05). No correlation between other molecular alterations, clinico-pathological characteristics and prognosis was found. Our study demonstrates that a comprehensive genotypic and morphological assessment of surgically treated multifocal lung cancers is feasible but not sufficient to establish their clonal relationship and prognosis.

Role of epidermal growth factor mutational status for distinction between recurrent lung cancer and second primary lung cancer: case report

INTRODUCTION

In a patient with previous radically treated lung adenocarcinoma, the detection of a new lung cancer raises the question whether recurrence or a second primary lung cancer is involved. Current criteria for differentiating multiple lung tumors lack a biologic and molecular basis and may lead to misclassification with impact on survival.

OBJECTIVES

We report the case of a female patient with a recent diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and a previous lung adenocarcinoma submitted to curative surgical therapy 4 years before. As both lesions were resected, were of the same histologic subtype and presented the same immunohistochemistry profile; we decided to perform mutational analysis of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) gene to differentiate between recurrence and second primary lung cancer.

METHODS

The EGFR gene was screened for mutations in exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 using direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products in DNA obtained from paraffin preserved cells from both tumors.

RESULTS

Mutational analysis of the EGFR gene, revealed different mutations in each tumor (both on exon 19) allowing the confirmation of the diagnosis of two metachronous primary lung cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient, mutational analysis of the EGFR gene was superior to histologic and immunohistochemistry characterization in differentiating between recurrent lung cancer and second primary lung cancer; allowing confirmation of the diagnosis of two metachronous primary lung cancers.

Pathologists' staging of multiple foci of lung cancer: poor concordance in absence of dramatic histologic or molecular differences

OBJECTIVES

A long-standing problem in lung cancer pathology has been to determine whether two anatomically distinct foci of lung carcinoma are independent primaries or intrapulmonary metastases. While several proposals exist with respect to this problem, it is not known how pathologists use these proposals in actual practice.

METHODS

We performed a voluntary survey of the Pulmonary Pathology Society, a self-selected group of pathologists with a specialty interest in pulmonary pathology, to determine their opinion on staging various specific scenarios of multiple foci of lung cancer.

RESULTS

We found that there was a great deal of disagreement and uncertainty in the approach to these scenarios unless there were also unambiguous molecular markers or a dramatic difference in histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologists have a high degree of uncertainty and disagreement on staging multiple lung carcinomas. An improved pathologic method is required to distinguish separate primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases. Until that is available, improved nomenclature is needed to convey the intrinsic uncertainty of the situation.

The Clinical Use of Genomic Profiling to Distinguish Intrapulmonary Metastases From Synchronous Primaries in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Mini-Review

The ability to reliably distinguish synchronous primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from intrapulmonary metastatic spread affects staging and treatment decisions in resected NSCLC. Adjuvant therapy for early-stage NSCLC is complicated and recommendations are primarily based on older data from trials that used now-outdated staging systems. Patients found to have 2 tumors with similar morphology in the same lobe are currently staged as pathologic T3 (pT3) but such cases represent a minority of patients in adjuvant lung cancer trials. Potentially more precise than tumor morphology alone, comprehensive genomic profiling technologies have the power to discriminate whether tumors in the same lobe represent 2 separate primary lesions or localized spread of a single lesion. In addition to lineage insights, tumor profiling simultaneously provides information on actionable genomic alterations. In this review we discuss the data that support the ability of molecular technologies to distinguish synchronous primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases and discuss the use of molecular assays as an adjunct to current staging systems. Two cases are presented to highlight the potential immediate clinical implications of comprehensive genomic profiling.

Microsatellite alteration in multiple primary lung cancer

Patients with pulmonary neoplasms have an increased risk for developing a second tumor of the lung, either at the same time or different times. It is important to determine if the second tumor represents an independent primary tumor or recurrence/metastasis, because it will significantly change the management and prognosis. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) represents molecular disorders acquired by the cell during neoplastic transformation. Both are associated with genetic instability. Functional silencing of tumour suppressor genes may be the consequence of genomic instability, particularly of the globally occurring LOH phenomenon. Numerous studies have confirmed the role of MSI/LOH at both the early and the late stages of multiple primary lung cancer. This paper reviews the published literatures focused on the role of MSI/LOH significance in multiple primary lung cancer. Additionally, a new method based on the allelic variations at polymorphic microsatellite markers was offered that it does not rely on collection of normal tissue, performed with minimal tumor sample, and will complement clinical criteria for diagnostic discrimination between multiple primary cancers versus solitary metastatic diseases.

Synchronous triple primary lung cancers: a case report

Synchronous primary lung cancers are relatively rare. The accurate diagnosis remains challenging, despite of the routine use of bronchoscopy and computed tomography (CT) of the chest. Herein we report a case of synchronous triple primary cancers of the right lung in a 72-year-old male patient in whom each tumor presented distinct CT imaging findings.

The pivotal role of pathology in the management of lung cancer

The last decade has seen significant advances in our understanding of lung cancer biology and management. Identification of key driver events in lung carcinogenesis has contributed to the development of targeted lung cancer therapies, heralding the era of personalised medicine for lung cancer. As a result, histological subtyping and molecular testing has become of paramount importance, placing increasing demands on often small diagnostic specimens. This has triggered the review and development of the first structured classification of lung cancer in small biopsy/cytology specimens and a new classification of lung adenocarcinoma from the IASLC/ATS/ERS. These have enhanced the clinical relevance of pathological diagnosis, and emphasise the role of the modern surgical pathologist as an integral member of the multidisciplinary team, playing a crucial role in clinical trials and determining appropriate and timely management for patients with lung cancer.

Synchronous double primary lung cancer: a report of three cases

The incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers is on the rise due to improvements in computed tomography (CT) scanning and increasing use of positron emission tomography scanning and other diagnostic modalities. We report three cases of synchronous double primary lung cancer (DPLC) diagnosed based on CT findings, results of bronchoscopy and histological study. All patients had a long-term history of heavy smoking. Squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma were the most common histological types in these cases. DPLC frequently involves the upper lobes of left or right lung. Future molecular biological studies on DPLC should be warranted to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of DPLC and the role of targeted therapy in this condition.

The stage classification of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

The current Lung Cancer Stage Classification system is the seventh edition, which took effect in January 2010. This article reviews the definitions for the TNM descriptors and the stage grouping in this system.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

A metastasis or a second independent cancer? Evaluating the clonal origin of tumors using array copy number data

When a cancer patient develops a new tumor it is necessary to determine if it is a recurrence (metastasis) of the original cancer, or an entirely new occurrence of the disease. This is accomplished by assessing the histo-pathology of the lesions. However, there are many clinical scenarios in which this pathological diagnosis is difficult. Since each tumor is characterized by a distinct pattern of somatic mutations, a more definitive diagnosis is possible in principle in these difficult clinical scenarios by comparing the two patterns. In this article we develop and evaluate a statistical strategy for this comparison when the data are derived from array copy number data, designed to identify all of the somatic allelic gains and losses across the genome. First a segmentation algorithm is used to estimate the regions of allelic gain and loss. The correlation in these patterns between the two tumors is assessed, and this is complemented with more precise quantitative comparisons of each plausibly clonal mutation within individual chromosome arms. The results are combined to determine a likelihood ratio to distinguish clonal tumor pairs (metastases) from independent second primaries. Our data analyses show that in many cases a strong clonal signal emerges. Sensitivity analyses show that most of the diagnoses are robust when the data are of high quality.

Smoking cessation: an integral part of lung cancer treatment

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the US. About 50% of lung cancer patients are current smokers at the time of diagnosis and up to 83% continue to smoke after diagnosis. A recent study suggests that people who continue to smoke after a diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer almost double their risk of dying. Despite a growing body of evidence that continued smoking by patients after a lung cancer diagnosis is linked with less effective treatment and a poorer prognosis, the belief prevails that treating tobacco dependence is useless. With improved cancer treatments and survival rates, smoking cessation among lung cancer patients has become increasingly important. There is a pressing need to clarify the role of smoking cessation in the care of lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

This paper will report on the benefits of smoking cessation for lung cancer patients and the elements of smoking cessation treatment, with consideration of tailoring to the needs of lung cancer patients.

RESULTS

Given the significant benefits of smoking cessation and that tobacco dependence remains a challenge for many lung cancer patients, cancer care providers need to offer full support and intensive treatment with a smoking cessation program that is tailored to lung cancer patients' specific needs.

CONCLUSION

A tobacco dependence treatment plan for lung cancer patients is provided.

Resection of secondary pulmonary malignancies in head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate a single institute's experience with resection of metachronous pulmonary malignancy in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Sixty-three consecutive patients treated curatively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma underwent surgical resection of malignant lung lesions. Survival was estimated and potential prognostic factors investigated.

RESULTS

The median overall survival for the total group was 22.2 months. Fifty-one patients (81 per cent) had one lung lesion, while the remainder had multiple lesions (range, two to seven). In the 63 patients, 35 lobectomies, 4 pneumonectomies and 24 wedge resections were performed. For patients with pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (n = 52), the three-year survival rate was 35 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 22-48); for patients with resected adenocarcinoma (n = 10), it was 50 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 18-75). The overall five-year survival rate was 30 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval, 19-42).

CONCLUSION

In patients treated curatively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, resection of secondary pulmonary cancer is associated with favourable long term overall survival, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma lesions.

Testing clonal relatedness of tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization: a statistical challenge

In recent years several investigative groups have sought to use array technologies that characterize somatic alterations in tumors, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (ACGH), to classify pairs of tumors from the same patients as either independent primary cancers or metastases. A wide variety of strategies have been proposed. Several groups have endeavored to use hierarchical clustering for this purpose. This technique was popularized in genomics as a means of finding clusters of patients with similar gene expression patterns with a view to finding subcategories of tumors with distinct clinical characteristics. Unfortunately, this method is not well suited to the problem of classifying individual pairs of tumors as either clonal or independent. In this article we show why hierarchical clustering is unsuitable for this purpose, and why this method has the paradoxical property of producing a declining probability that clonal tumor pairs will be correctly identified as more information is accrued (i.e., more patients). We discuss alternative strategies that have been proposed, which are based on more conventional conceptual formulations for statistical testing and diagnosis, and point to the remaining challenges in constructing valid and robust techniques for this problem.

Genomic and mutational profiling to assess clonal relationships between multiple non-small cell lung cancers

PURPOSE

In cases of multiple non-small cell lung cancer, clinicians must decide whether patients have independent tumors or metastases and tailor treatment accordingly. Decisions are currently made using the Martini and Melamed criteria, which are mostly based on tumor location and histologic type. New genomic tools could improve the ability to assess tumor clonality.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We obtained fresh-frozen tumors specimens from patients who underwent surgery on at least two occasions for presumptively independent NSCLC. We did array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), mutational profiling of select genes, and detailed clinicopathologic review.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 42 tumors from 20 patients (6 patients with synchronous tumors, 14 patients with metachronous tumors, 24 potential tumor pair comparisons); 22 tumor pairs were evaluable by aCGH. Surprisingly, classification based on genomic profiling contradicted the clinicopathologic diagnosis in four (18%) of the comparisons, identifying independent primaries in one case diagnosed as metastasis and metastases in three cases diagnosed as independent primaries. Matching somatic point mutations were observed in these latter three cases. Another four tumor pairings were assigned an "equivocal" result based on aCGH; however, matching somatic point mutations were also found in these tumor pairs. None of the tumor pairs deemed independent primaries by aCGH harbored matching mutations.

CONCLUSION

Genomic analysis can help distinguish clonal tumors from independent primaries. The development of rapid, inexpensive, and reliable molecular tools may allow for refinement of clinicopathologic criteria currently used in this setting.

Evidence for common clonal origin of multifocal lung cancers

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Multiple anatomically separate but histologically similar lung tumors are often found in the same patient. The clonal origin of multiple lung tumors is uncertain.

METHODS

We analyzed 70 lung tumors from 30 patients (23 females and seven males) who underwent surgical resection for lung epithelial tumors, of whom 26 had non-small cell carcinomas and four had carcinoid/atypical carcinoid tumors. All patients had multiple tumors (two to five) involving one or both lungs. Genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue sections using laser capture microdissection and analyzed for loss of heterozygosity, TP53 mutations, and X-chromosome inactivation status. The percentage (95% confidence interval [CI]) of patients in whom there were concordant patterns of genetic alteration was calculated.

RESULTS

All 30 case subjects showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in at least one and at most four of the six polymorphic microsatellite markers. Completely concordant LOH patterns between synchronous and metachronous cancers in individual patients were seen in 26 (87%) of 30 informative patients (95% CI = 75% to 99%). Identical point mutations were present in eight of 10 patients who exhibited TP53 mutation by sequencing. Tumors in 18 (78%) of 23 female patients (95% CI = 67% to 98%) showed identical X-chromosome inactivation patterns. Combining the results of LOH studies, TP53 mutation screening analyses, and X-chromosome inactivation data, we demonstrated that the multiple separate tumors in 23 (77%) of 30 patients (95% CI = 62% to 92%) had identical genetic changes, consistent with monoclonal origin of the separate tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the great majority of multifocal lung cancers have a common clonal origin and that multifocality in lung cancer represents local and regional intrapulmonary metastasis.

Evaluation of the clonal origin of multiple primary melanomas using molecular profiling

Numerous investigations have been conducted using molecular profiling to evaluate the possible clonal origin of second malignancies in various cancer types. However, to date no study assessing clonality of multiple primaries has been conducted in melanoma. In this investigation using patients treated at a specialist melanoma treatment center, we compared the somatic mutational profiles of pairs of melanomas designated as independent on the basis of thorough assessment of their clinical and pathologic characteristics. We used a set of highly polymorphic genetic markers selected on the basis of their chromosomal positions and the frequencies of reported allelic losses at these genetic loci. Our statistical testing strategy showed no significant evidence of clonal origin of the two primaries in 17 of the 19 patients examined. The results suggest that most second melanomas designated as independent primary tumors on the basis of their clinicopathologic features are indeed independent occurrences of the disease, supporting the validity of the criteria used by experienced pathologists in distinguishing new primaries from metastases.

Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications

PURPOSE

To study the histopathologic features of CT screen-detected Stage IA adenocarcinomas to determine whether survival differed by the proportion of bronchioloalveolar component (BAC) or by the presence of multiple lesions in node-negative patients.

METHODS

Five pathologists with expertise in pulmonary pathology examined 279 resected cases of adenocarcinomas, 30 mm or less in length diagnosed by CT screening for lung cancer. The panel determined the consensus diagnosis for each case, identified additional cancers, and classified each case as solitary or non-solitary. The presence and proportion of BAC was also documented.

RESULTS

Of the cases of adenocarcinoma, 20 (7%) were BAC subtype, 246 (88%) mixed subtype and 13 (5%) adenocarcinoma-OTHER. BAC cases manifested as non-solid and part solid nodules, mixed as solid and part-solid, and other as solid only. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival rates were 100% for BAC and adeno-MIXED with 90-99% BAC cases, 95% for mixed with 1-90% BAC, 90% for those without a BAC component, and 75% for other cases. Fifty (18%) cases were non-solitary carcinomas and 44 of these were node negative; the non-solitary node-negative cases had the same excellent prognosis as solitary node-negative cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of BAC component was a positive prognostic factor and correlated with CT consistency. Contrary to staging predictions, cases of non-solitary node-negative adenocarcinoma had the same excellent prognosis as solitary node-negative cases, suggesting that most of the small, node-negative multiple carcinomas probably represent multiple primaries rather than intrapulmonary metastasis.

Predicting Clinical Outcome in Patients Diagnosed with Synchronous Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer

Purpose: Patients with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers may represent cases of a single primary tumor with metastasis (SPM) or dual primary tumors (DP). The diagnosis given will influence the patient's treatment and prognosis. Currently, a diagnosis of SPM or DP is made using histologic criteria, which are frequently unable to make a definitive diagnosis.

Experimental Design: In this study, we used genetic profiling to make a genetic diagnosis of SPM or DP in 90 patients with synchronous ovarian/endometrial cancers. We compared genetic diagnoses in these patients with the original histologic diagnoses and evaluated the clinical outcome in this series of patients based on their diagnoses.

Results: Combining genetic and histologic approaches, we were able make a diagnosis in 88 of 90 cases, whereas histology alone was able to make a diagnosis in only 64 cases. Patients diagnosed with SPM had a significantly worse survival than patients with DP (P = 0.002). Patients in which both tumors were of endometrioid histology survived longer than patients of other histologic subtypes (P = 0.025), and patients diagnosed with SPM had a worse survival if the mode of spread was from ovary to endometrium rather than from endometrium to ovary (P = 0.019).

Conclusions: Genetic analysis may represent a powerful tool for use in clinical practice for distinguishing between SPM and DP in patients with synchronous ovarian/endometrial cancer and predicting disease outcome. The data also suggest a hitherto uncharacterized level of heterogeneity in these cases, which, if accurately defined, could lead to improved treatment and survival.

Pathologic and molecular features of screening low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-detected lung cancer: a baseline and 2-year repeat study

Detailed studies on the pathologic and molecular features of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-detected carcinomas and comparison with unscreened tumors are still lacking. We evaluated the histopathologic features of 89 LDCT-detected lung cancers resected between 2004 and 2006. These tumors occurred within a cohort of 5202 volunteers undergoing annual LDCT, aged > or =50 years, and with a minimum 20 pack-year index. In adenocarcinomas, central scar diameter, invasion foci size and K-ras mutations were also assessed. The results were compared with those of 89 consecutive lung carcinomas matched for confounding factors (sex, smoking habit), selected from group of 363 consecutive clinically worked-up lung cancer, surgically resected in the same period and at the same Institution. The tumors were diagnosed in 63 males and 26 females (range 50-79 years), 55 of which diagnosed at the baseline (1.05%) and 34 (including 10 repeat cancers) operated after work-up during the second year (0.72%). LDCT-detected tumors showed high resectability rate (89%), earlier stage (63%) and prevalence of adenocarcinoma nodules (72%), most often of the mixed subtype, in comparison with unscreened tumors. A similar prevalence of K-ras mutations was found in both screened and unscreened adenocarcinomas. Repeat cancers were found in 10 screened patients, and were predominantly stage I adenocarcinomas of mixed subtype exhibiting smaller dimension but greater central scar diameter and stromal invasion size in comparison with the other second-year, slower-growing adenocarcinomas. Multiple tumor nodules were identified in 10 patients exclusively at the baseline, were mostly mixed adenocarcinomas and differed in their K-ras mutation profile. Screening-detected lung cancers shared most of the histologic features of fully malignant tumors, in addition to a similar prevalence of K-ras mutations, despite their earlier detection and less advanced clinical stage. Repeat cancers are potentially aggressive tumors. K-ras mutation analysis supports the impression that multifocal tumors at baseline are separate synchronous primaries.

Three different synchronous primary lung tumours: A case report with extensive genetic analysis and review of the literature

Synchronous triple lung tumours are rare and little is known as for their genetic basis. Here we report a case of a 59 years old male with three synchronous independent and histological different primary tumours of the left lung. Two nodules were located in the upper lobe and consisted of an adenocarcinoma (ADC) and an endobronchial poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A third nodule of the lower lobe corresponded to a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCLC). To assess if they represented independent primary tumours and have common genetic profiles, tumours were investigated for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 40 chromosomal markers. A comparable fractional allelic loss of 0.52 was observed in the ADC and SCLC, while it was 0.28 in the SCC. Microallelotyping analysis did not reveal a common genetic profile, supporting the hypothesis that the three synchronous tumours are truly independent primaries with different histogenesis.

Comparison of properties of tests for assessing tumor clonality

SUMMARY

In a recent article Begg et al. (2007, Biometrics 63, 522-530) proposed a statistical test to determine whether or not a diagnosed second primary tumor is biologically independent of the original primary tumor, by comparing patterns of allelic losses at candidate genetic loci. The proposed concordant mutations test is a conditional test, an adaptation of Fisher's exact test, that requires no knowledge of the marginal mutation probabilities. The test was shown to have generally good properties, but is susceptible to anticonservative bias if there is wide variation in mutation probabilities between loci, or if the individual mutation probabilities of the parental alleles for individual patients differ substantially from each other. In this article, a likelihood ratio test is derived in an effort to address these validity issues. This test requires prespecification of the marginal mutation probabilities at each locus, parameters for which some information will typically be available in the literature. In simulations this test is shown to be valid, but to be considerably less efficient than the concordant mutations test for sample sizes (numbers of informative loci) typical of this problem. Much of the efficiency deficit can be recovered, however, by restricting the allelic imbalance parameter estimate to a prespecified range, assuming that this parameter is in the prespecified range.