Initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis peritonitis without vancomycin with a once-daily cefazolin-based regimen

A 12-Month Review of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis in Western Australia: Is Empiric Vancomycin Still Indicated for Some Patients?

Background

The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines recommend empiric therapy with cefazolin and ceftazidime for peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. Empiric cefazolin therapy may have diminishing efficacy because of emerging methicillin resistance in gram-positive bacteria (GPB). Western Australia also has large numbers of Aboriginal and isolated regional patients, where giving these antimicrobials can be impractical.

Objectives

To evaluate, based on local antimicrobial resistance patterns, the feasibility of following ISPD guidelines in Western Australia and to identify any subgroups of PD peritonitis patients that may benefit from alternative empiric intraperitoneal antibiotics ( e.g., vancomycin).

Study Design

Retrospective study of all PD peritonitis episodes in Western Australia from 1 February 2000 to 31 January 2001.

Setting

Three adult tertiary referral university hospitals and their PD patients in metropolitan Perth and regional Western Australia.

Patients

All adults on PD in Western Australia.

Main Outcome Measure

Isolates and antibiograms were analyzed versus patient characteristics, including race and patient demographics.

Results

293 patients (28% Aborigines, 32% regional patients) received PD. 145 episodes of PD peritonitis occurred during the study. The overall PD peritonitis rate was 1 episode/16 patient months, with Aborigines having 1 episode/10.5 patient months versus non-Aborigines having 1 episode/17 patient months p (< 0.001). 36% of isolates from PD peritonitis episodes were resistant to cefazolin or ceftazidime. 22% were methicillin-resistant GPB (MR-GPB) [18% coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), 1.6% MR Staphylococcus aureus]; 2.5% were multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB); 5.7% were polymicrobial (MR-GPB and/or MDR-GNB); and 5.7% were fungal. 63% of CoNS were methicillin resistant. Non-Aboriginal patients yielded MR-GPB in 22% of isolates versus 23% in Aborigines ( p = 0.9). Six of seven cases of fungal peritonitis occurred inAboriginal patients ( p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our study population the ISPD guidelines were appropriate for 64% of patients with PD peritonitis. We could not identify specific patient subgroups where empiric cefazolin use could be more effective. High proportions of MR-GPB PD peritonitis episodes, along with local factors, make empiric cefazolin unsuitable for many regional PD patients in Western Australia.

Challenging the Current Treatment Paradigm for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Epidermidis Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Objectives

To analyze clinical outcomes of Staphylococcus epidermidis peritoneal dialysis peritonitis before and after an interventional switch from a vancomycin/tobramycin to a cefazolin/tobramycin regimen for empiric treatment. To examine risk factors associated with clinical failure.

Design

A retrospective study.

Setting

A peritoneal dialysis program within a university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital.

Patients

93 episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis over a 6-year period.

Interventions

Clinical responses were compared between treatments using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant risk factors for clinical failure.

Measurements and Main Results

There was no difference in the overall response rates observed with vancomycin (40/49; 81.6%) and cefazolin (23/29; 79.3%) regimens for episodes of S. epidermidis peritonitis. Furthermore, the presence of methicillin resistance in 63 of 93 cases (67.7%) had no influence on clinical outcome, with response rates of 83.9% (26/31) and 82.4% (14/17) for empiric vancomycin and cefazolin regimens, respectively. Tobramycin therapy of less than 2 days was an independent risk factor for clinical failure in multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.28 – 15.48; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Empiric treatment with intraperitoneal cefazolin was as effective as vancomycin for S. epidermidis peritonitis despite a high prevalence of methicillin resistance. Tobramycin therapy of less than 2 days was strongly associated with treatment failure.

Predictors of Outcome following Bacterial Peritonitis in Peritoneal Dialysis

Objective

No studies have been done to examine factors that predict the outcome of bacterial peritonitis during peritoneal dialysis (PD), beyond the contribution of the organism causing the peritonitis, concurrent exit-site or tunnel infection, and abdominal catastrophes.

Design

In this study we examined several clinical and laboratory parameters that might predict the outcome of an episode of bacterial peritonitis. Between March 1995 and July 2000, we identified 399 episodes of bacterial peritonitis in 191 patients on dialysis.

Results

There were 260 episodes of gram-positive peritonitis, 99 episodes of gram-negative peritonitis, and 40 episodes of polymicrobial peritonitis. Gram-positive peritonitis had a significantly higher resolution rate than either polymicrobial peritonitis or gram-negative peritonitis. Staphylococcus aureus episodes had poorer resolution than other gram-positive infections. Nonpseudomonal peritonitis had a better outcome than Pseudomonas aeruginosa episodes. Among all the gram-negative infections, Serratia marcescens had the worst outcome. Episodes associated with a purulent exit site had poor outcome only on univariate analysis. For those peritonitis episodes in which the PD fluid cell count was > 100/μL for more than 5 days, the nonresolution rate was 45.6%, compared to a 4.2% nonresolution rate when the cell count returned to 100/μL or less in less than 5 days. Those patients that had a successful outcome had been on continuous ambulatory PD for a significantly shorter period of time than those patients that had nonresolution. The nonresolution rate for those patients that had been on PD for more than 2.4 years was 24.4%, compared to 16.5% for those that had been on PD for less than 2.4 years ( p = 0.05).

Conclusion

The duration of PD and the number of days the PD effluent cell count remained > 100/μL were the only factors that independently predicted the outcome of an episode of peritonitis. Caucasians seem to have a higher nonresolution (failure) rate compared to Blacks. Other variables, such as the number of peritonitis episodes before the episode in question, vancomycin-based initial empiric treatment, serum albumin level, total lymphocyte count and initial dialysate white blood cell count, age, sex, diabetes, previous renal transplantation, and the use of steroids did not affect the outcome of peritonitis.

Treatment and outcome of Peritonitis in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis, using a Once-Daily Cefazolin-Based Regimen

Objective

We determined the effectiveness of a once-daily cefazolin-based regimen in treating automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) peritonitis.

Design

We carried out a retrospective analysis of all APD peritonitis episodes treated with a once-daily cefazolin protocol.

Setting

The study was performed in a peritoneal dialysis unit in a tertiary care hospital.

Patients and Methods

We studied 60 episodes of primary peritonitis in 40 patients on APD. Each patient was treated with a vancomycin-free regimen consisting of intraperitoneal cefazolin (1.5 g IP) with gentamicin IP administered in the daytime exchange. The main outcome measures were successful treatment of peritonitis, removal of peritoneal catheter, relapse of peritonitis, and patient death.

Results

Gram-positive infections occurred in 35 episodes (58.3%), gram-negative infections in 10 episodes (16.7%), culture-negative infections in 14 episodes (23.3%), and a yeast infection in 1 episode (1.7%). Of the 60 episodes, 47 (78.3%) were successfully treated. In 10 episodes (16.7%), catheters were removed (9 for treatment failure, 1 for yeast infection). Four patients (8%) had a relapse of infection within 4 weeks of completing antibiotic therapy. One patient (1.7%) died.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that once-daily cefazolin with gentamicin IP is an effective treatment for APD peritonitis, with the advantage of being easy to administer and enabling patients to remain on APD during treatment.

Vancomycin and Ciprofloxacin: Systemic Antibiotic Administration for Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis

Objectives

Peritonitis due to peritoneal dialysis (PD) is best treated empirically while waiting for the results of the dialysate culture. Thus, antibiotic therapy must cover both gram-positive and gram-negative micro-organisms. First, over a period of 9 years in a multicenter study we evaluated the efficiency of a vancomycin and ciprofloxacin combination given as the first-line treatment protocol for PD peritonitis. Second, we evaluated whether a systemic route of administration of the antibiotics could be an interesting alternative to the usual cumbersome intraperitoneal drug administration.

Methods

Vancomycin 15 mg/kg body weight, intravenous, and oral ciprofloxacin 250 mg two times per day (500 mg twice per day if residual creatinine clearance was above 3 mL/minute) were prescribed at diagnosis of peritonitis. Vancomycin injections were repeated (when blood trough level was expected to be below 12 μg/mL) in cases of gram-positive organisms for a total duration of 3 weeks. Ciprofloxacin was given for a total of 3 weeks in cases of gram-negative and a total of 10 days for susceptible gram-positive infections.

Results

A total of 129 episodes of peritonitis occurred; 28 of them were not included in the study because of protocol violation ( n = 15) or fungal ( n = 7) or fecal ( n = 6) peritonitis, leaving 101 peritonitis episodes for analysis. 52 (51.5%) gram-positive and 28 (27.7%) gram-negative organisms were grown; 38 gram-positive organisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci. No organism was identified in 8 peritonitis episodes, whereas 13 peritonitis episodes were caused by more than 1 organism. 35% of the coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to first-generation cephalosporin and methicillin, whereas all were susceptible to vancomycin. For gram-negative bacilli, the susceptibility rate was 96% and 95% for ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime respectively. The overall treatment success rate was 77.2% (78 of the 101 peritonitis episodes): 61.4% at first intention and 15.8% after optimization of the antibiotic therapy (second intention). The protocol failed in 22.8% of the peritonitis episodes. Hospitalization was required in 52% of the peritonitis episodes; average hospitalization was 11 (range 1 – 45) days.

Conclusion

Systemic vancomycin and ciprofloxacin administration is a simple and efficient first-line protocol antibiotic therapy for PD peritonitis. In our opinion, vancomycin should still be used for gram-positive infections because of its high susceptibility rate compared with first-generation cephalosporins, providing a close monitoring of the local epidemiology. Oral ciprofloxacin provides satisfactory results in gram-negative infections, comparable to those obtained with intraperitoneal ceftazidime or aminoglycosides.

Evidence-based medicine: An update on treatments for peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

Peritonitis continues to be a major complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD), and adequate treatment is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus regarding the optimal therapeutic regimen, and few prospective controlled studies have been published. The objective of this manuscript is to review the results of PD peritonitis treatment reported in narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and proportional meta-analyses. Two narrative reviews, the only existing systematic review and its update published between 1991 and 2014 were included. In addition, we reported the results of a proportional meta-analysis published by our group. Results from systematic reviews of randomized control trials (RCT) and quasi-RCT were not able to identify any optimal antimicrobial treatment, but glycopeptide regimens were more likely to achieve a complete cure than a first generation cephalosporin. Compared to urokinase, simultaneous catheter removal and replacement resulted in better outcomes. Continuous and intermittent IP antibiotic use had similar outcomes. Intraperitoneal antibiotics were superior to intravenous antibiotics in reducing treatment failure. In the proportional meta-analysis of RCTs and the case series, the resolution rate (86%) of ceftazidime plus glycopeptide as initial treatment was significantly higher than first generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycosides (66%) and glycopeptides plus aminoglycosides (75%). Other comparisons of regimens used for either initial treatment or treatment of gram-positive rods or gram-negative rods did not show statistically significant differences. The superiority of a combination of a glycopeptide and a third generation cephalosporin was also reported by a narrative review study published in 1991, which reported an 88% resolution rate.

Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis

Background

The choice of antimicrobials for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus about the best therapy; few prospective controlled studies have been published, and the only published systematic reviews did not report superiority of any class of antimicrobials. The objective of this review was to analyze the results of PD peritonitis treatment in adult patients by employing a new methodology, the proportional meta-analysis.

Methods

A review of the literature was conducted. There was no language restriction. Studies were obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were: (a) case series and RCTs with the number of reported patients in each study greater than five, (b) use of any antibiotic therapy for initial treatment (e.g., cefazolin plus gentamicin or vancomycin plus gentamicin), for Gram-positive (e.g., vancomycin or a first generation cephalosporin), or for Gram-negative rods (e.g., gentamicin, ceftazidime, and fluoroquinolone), (c) patients with PD-related peritonitis, and (d) studies specifying the rates of resolution. A proportional meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using a random-effects model, and the pooled resolution rates were calculated.

Results

A total of 64 studies (32 for initial treatment and negative culture, 28 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 24 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods) and 21 RCTs met all inclusion criteria (14 for initial treatment and negative culture, 8 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 8 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods). The pooled resolution rate of ceftazidime plus glycopeptide as initial treatment (pooled proportion = 86% [95% CI 0.82–0.89]) was significantly higher than first generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 66% [95% CI 0.57–0.75]) and significantly higher than glycopeptides plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 75% [95% CI 0.69–0.80]. Other comparisons of regimens used for either initial treatment, treatment for Gram-positive rods or Gram-negative rods did not show statistically significant differences.

Conclusion

We showed that the association of a glycopeptide plus ceftazidime is superior to other regimens for initial treatment of PD peritonitis. This result should be carefully analyzed and does not exclude the necessity of monitoring the local microbiologic profile in each dialysis center to choice the initial therapeutic protocol.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-445) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Similar peritonitis outcome in CAPD and APD patients with dialysis modality continuation during peritonitis

BACKGROUND

As few data exist on treatment of peritonitis in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), and as pharmacokinetics of several antibiotics are reported to be unfavorable in APD, some favor switching to continuous ambulant PD (CAPD) while treating APD-related peritonitis. We explored whether treating peritonitis with patients continuing their usual PD modality had an effect on outcome.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the 508 episodes of PD-associated peritonitis seen in 205 patients in our center from January 1993 to January 2007. During this period, the standard initial therapy for PD-related peritonitis was a combination of intraperitoneal gentamicin and rifampicin.

RESULTS

There was no difference in cure rate between CAPD and APD groups. Likewise, initial and maximal leukocyte counts in the PD fluid (PDF), relapse rates, catheter removal rates, and death during treatment of peritonitis were similar in the CAPD and APD groups. Median (interquartile range) duration of elevated leukocyte count in PDF was longer in APD: 5.0 (3.0 - 9.0) days versus 4.0 (2.5 - 7.0) days in CAPD (p <0.001). APD patients were treated with antibiotics longer than CAPD patients: 16.0 (12.5 - 21.0) versus 15.0 (12.0 - 18.0) days (p = 0.036). Also, after correction for possible confounders, odds ratios for death and for the combined end point death or catheter removal showed no difference when patients treated for peritonitis stayed on their own modality.

CONCLUSION

Regarding rate of relapse, mortality, or the combined end point mortality plus catheter removal, we found no difference between CAPD and APD patients continuing their own PD modality during treatment of PD-related peritonitis. Intermediate end points such as duration of elevated PDF leukocyte count and duration of antibiotic treatment were longer in APD patients.

Efficacy of a non-vancomycin-based peritoneal dialysis peritonitis protocol

BACKGROUND

Peritonitis has a significant impact upon morbidity and mortality of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Gram-positive organisms account for the majority of infections and vancomycin is a cost effective broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment for PD peritonitis, but this may lead to the emergence of multiple antibiotic-resistant organisms. The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate the efficacy of a non-vancomycin-based protocol comprising cephazolin and gentamicin, which was introduced in the present PD population as empirical treatment for peritonitis.

METHODS

The study involved 82 peritonitis episodes over a 4-year period in 58 patients, excluding those with previous methicillin-resistant staphylococcal peritonitis.

RESULTS

With cephazolin and gentamicin there was no apparent difference in response or relapse rates in comparison to reported studies using vancomycin-based first-line therapy protocols.

CONCLUSION

We advocate initial treatment of PD peritonitis with non-vancomycin-based therapy given similar efficacy and the potential for reduction of resistant organisms.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter removal for acute peritonitis: a retrospective analysis of factors associated with catheter removal and prolonged postoperative hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Most patients with acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) peritonitis respond to antibiotic therapy, but a significant minority of patients require surgical catheter removal to eradicate the infection. These patients may experience an adverse postsurgical course.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 64 episodes of acute peritonitis requiring PD catheter removal in comparison to 426 episodes treated with antibiotics alone.

RESULTS

There were no differences between patients who required PD catheter removal and medically treated patients in sex (62% versus 60% men; P > 0.05), PD modality (31% versus 27% automated PD; P > 0.05), time spent on PD therapy (35 versus 26 months; P > 0.05), or cause of end-stage renal failure. Catheter removal was more likely to occur in elderly (mean age, 61 versus 54 years; P = 0.023) and South Asian patients (38% versus 22%; P = 0.020) and after peritonitis caused by Escherichia coli (16% versus 4%; P = 0.0005), Enterobacter species (5% versus 0.7%; P = 0.031), and Pseudomonas species (5% versus 0.7%; P = 0.031). The most significant correlation with requirement for surgical catheter removal was duration of peritonitis (mean, 7.5 versus 2.8 days; P = 1.3 x 10(-6)). Fifty-three percent of catheter removals resulted in postoperative hospitalization longer than 10 days. Delayed discharges were caused by multiple reasons. Compared with discharges within 10 days, prolonged hospitalization was associated with increased age (mean, 64 versus 58 years; P = 0.028) and delay in time to catheter removal (mean, 7.9 versus 5.3 days; P = 0.027). After catheter removal, only 4% of patients successfully returned to maintenance PD therapy.

CONCLUSION

Increased age and duration of peritonitis are associated with both requirement for PD catheter removal and prolonged postoperative hospitalization.

Empirical aminoglycosides for peritonitis do not affect residual renal function

BACKGROUND

Aminoglycosides have been proven to be an efficacious treatment for peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients for many years. Consequently, they have been recommended in previous guidelines for the empirical treatment of peritonitis. However, with the increasing emphasis on preserving residual renal function (RRF), there has been concern about the nephrotoxic potential of these compounds. The 2000 International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines recommended that aminoglycosides not be used in patients with RRF, and that ceftazidime be used instead. In 1997, in response to the 1996 ISPD guidelines, we changed our peritonitis regimen from vancomycin and ciprofloxacin to cefazolin and gentamicin. The aim of this study is to compare the change in renal function occurring after treatment of peritonitis with and without gentamicin.

METHODS

Using 6-monthly urine and dialysis clearance measurements, preperitonitis and postperitonitis RRF (mean of 24-hour urea and creatinine clearance) were determined for 70 peritonitis episodes treated with the aminoglycoside-based regimen (group A), 61 episodes treated without aminoglycosides (group B), and 74 control patients without peritonitis (group C).

RESULTS

Group A had mean declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine output of -0.08 +/- 0.50 mL/min/mon and -8.82 +/- 88.09 mL/24 h/mon compared with -0.17 +/- 0.27 mL/min/mon and -34.68 +/- 69.58 mL/24 h/mon in group B and -0.20 +/- 0.39 mL/min/mon and -14.61 +/- 77.33 mL/24 h/mon in group C, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

In our patients, there was no evidence of an accelerated decline in RRF when using an empirical regimen containing aminoglycosides for peritonitis. Because there are few data to contradict this finding, we recommend the continued use of these drugs in peritonitis regimens, even in patients with significant RRF.

Infection with antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in dialysis patients

The prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in various health care settings, including outpatient dialysis facilities, has increased dramatically in the last decade. Antimicrobial use and patient-to-patient transmission of resistant strains are the two main factors that have contributed to this rapid increase. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci are commonly isolated as a cause of hemodialysis (HD) catheter-related bacteremia and peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related catheter infection and peritonitis. The widespread use of vancomycin in dialysis patients is of concern because of an increase in the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in dialysis patients. Staphylococci with reduced sensitivity to vancomycin have also appeared in dialysis patients. A more recent problem is the appearance of S. aureus isolates with a high degree of resistance to the topical antimicrobial agent mupirocin. This has been seen in PD patients who have received prophylactic application of mupirocin at the peritoneal catheter exit site. Appropriate antimicrobial use will help protect the efficacy of currently used antibiotics, such as vancomycin. Published guidelines for use of vancomycin should be followed. New antimicrobials such as linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin have activity against VRE and MRSA, but resistance to these agents has already occurred. Preventing transmission of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in health care settings, including outpatient dialysis facilities, is important in limiting the spread of these resistant organisms.

Preventing bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance in dialysis patients

Antimicrobial use, in concert with patient-to-patient transmission of resistant strains, has caused a rapid increase in the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in recent years. This increase is a particular threat to dialysis patients, who often have been in the forefront of the epidemic of resistance. In this report, which was written in collaboration between the American Society of Nephrology and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and has been endorsed by the Executive Council of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, we review and summarize existing clinical practice guidelines and recommendations concerning the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of certain bacterial infections in dialysis patients and present four strategies to limit the spread of antimicrobial resistance in dialysis patients. First, preventing infection eliminates the need for antimicrobials, thereby reducing selection pressure for resistant strains. Efforts to prevent infection include avoidance of hemodialysis catheters, when possible, and meticulous care of hemodialysis and peritoneal catheters and other hemodialysis vascular access sites. Second, diagnosing and treating infections appropriately can facilitate the use of narrower spectrum agents, rapidly decrease the number of infecting organisms, and reduce the probability of resistance emerging. This entails the collection of indicated specimens for culture and avoidance of contamination of cultures with common skin microorganisms. Third, optimizing antimicrobial use helps protect the efficacy of such critical agents as vancomycin. Published guidelines for the use of vancomycin should be followed, and alternate agents should be used when infections with beta-lactam-resistant bacteria are unlikely or not documented. Fourth, preventing transmission in health care settings is important to limit the spread of resistant organisms. In this regard, such basic measures as glove use and hand hygiene are most important.

Peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis

Peritonitis, an infectious complication of peritoneal dialysis, continues to account for much of the morbidity associated with this techniques. The clinical presentation and laboratory data used in diagnosis the peritonitis, as well as its differential diagnosis will be reviewed in this article. The distribution of pathogens is an important outcome determinant, Gram-negative infections being associated with greater rates of catheter loss and higher death rates. Among the five routes of peritoneal contamination, intraluminal and periluminal contamination account for most of the infections. Due to the two prevention methods implemented in the care of the PD population, the incidence of peritonitis has decreased over the last two decades. The recommendations for empiric treatment of peritonitis have changed over the years, as more was learnt about antibiotic resistance and drug toxicity. Future research to address enteric peritonitis, as well as biocompatible dialysis solution or biocompatible catheter materials is needed to further reduce the incidence of PD peritonitis.