Reduced-intensity transplantation with in vivo T-cell depletion and adjuvant dose-escalating donor lymphocyte infusions for chemotherapy-sensitive myeloma: limited efficacy of graft-versus-tumor activity

Allograft for Myeloma: Examining Pieces of the Jigsaw Puzzle

Multiple myeloma (MM) cure remains elusive despite the availability of newer anti-myeloma agents. Patients with high-risk disease often suffer from early relapse and short survival. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is an “immune-based” therapy that has the potential to offer long-term remission in a subgroup of patients, at the expense of high rates of transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) upon disease relapse after allo-HCT is able to generate an anti-myeloma response suggestive of a graft-versus-myeloma effect. Allo-HCT provides a robust platform for additional immune-based therapy upon relapse including DLI and, maintenance with immunomodulatory drugs and immunosuppressive therapy. There have been conflicting findings from randomized prospective trials questioning the role of allo-HCT. However, to this date, allo-HCT remains the only potential curable treatment for MM and its therapeutic role needs to be better defined especially for patients with high-risk disease. This review examines different aspects of this treatment and summarizes ongoing attempts at improving its therapeutic index.

Donor T-cell responses and disease progression patterns of multiple myeloma

Donor T-cells transferred after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can result in long-term disease control in myeloma by the graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect. However, T-cell therapy may show differential effectiveness against bone marrow (BM) infiltration and focal myeloma lesions resulting in different control and progression patterns. Outcomes of 43 myeloma patients who underwent T-cell-depleted alloSCT with scheduled donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were analyzed with respect to diffuse BM infiltration and focal progression. For comparison, 12 patients for whom a donor search was started but no alloSCT was performed, were analyzed. After DLI, complete disappearance of myeloma cells in BM occurred in 86% of evaluable patients. The probabilities of BM progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years after start of donor search, alloSCT and DLI, were 17% (95% confidence interval 0-38%), 51% (36-66%), and 62% (44-80%) respectively. In contrast, the probabilities of focal PFS at 2 years after start of donor search, alloSCT and DLI, were 17% (0-38%), 30% (17-44%) and 28% (11-44%), respectively. Donor-derived T-cell responses effectively reduce BM infiltration, but not focal progression in myeloma, illustrating potent immunological responses in BM with only limited effect of T-cells on focal lesions.

Adoptive cell therapy in multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Recent breakthrough advances in Multiple Myeloma (MM) immunotherapy have been achieved with the approval of the first two monoclonal antibodies, elotuzumab and daratumumab. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) represents yet another, maybe the most powerful modality of immunotherapy, in which allogeneic or autologous effector cells are expanded and activated ex vivo followed by their re-infusion back into patients. Infused effector cells belong to two categories: naturally occurring, non-engineered cells (donor lymphocyte infusion, myeloma infiltrating lymphocytes, deltagamma T cells) or genetically- engineered antigen-specific cells (chimeric antigen receptor T or NK cells, TCR-engineered cells). Areas covered: This review article summarizes our up-to-date knowledge on ACT in MM, its promises, and upcoming strategies to both overcome its toxicity and to integrate it into future treatment paradigms. Expert opinion: Early results of clinical studies using CAR T cells or TCR- engineered T cells in relapsed and refractory MM are particularly exciting, indicating the potential of long-term disease control or even cure. Despite several caveats including toxicity, costs and restricted availability in particular, these forms of immunotherapy are likely to once more revolutionize MM therapy.

Salvage chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed donor leukocyte infusion with graft-vs.-host disease control for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prognostic factors and clinical outcomes

This study investigated the prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of preemptive chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed donor leukocyte infusion (Chemo-DLI) according to minimal residual disease (MRD) status in patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (n = 101). Patients received immunosuppressive drugs to prevent graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) after Chemo-DLI. The 3-yr cumulative incidences of relapse, non-relapse mortality, and disease-free survival (DFS) after HSCT were 39.5%, 9.6%, and 51.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and DFS were significantly poorer in patients who exhibited early-onset MRD. Forty-four patients turned MRD negative 1 month after Chemo-DLI; their cumulative incidences of relapse and DFS were significantly better than those with persistent MRD 1 month after preemptive Chemo-DLI (relapse: 19.8% vs. 46.8%, P = 0.001; DFS: 69.6% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.004). The cumulative incidences of relapse and DFS after HSCT were significantly better in patients with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) than those without cGVHD (relapse: 19.6% vs. 63.7%, P < 0.001; DFS: 74.4% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001). Early-onset MRD, persistent MRD after Chemo-DLI, and non-cGVHD after Chemo-DLI, which were associated with increased relapse and impaired DFS, suggest unsatisfactory response to preemptive Chemo-DLI.

Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is currently incurable using standard treatment regimens. While the introduction of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue has been shown to increase overall survival when compared with chemotherapy alone, this strategy is palliative. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation provides the potential for long-term disease-free survival in a small proportion of patients, although its application has been limited by procedure-related mortality, reflecting the intensive myeloablative conditioning given. Recently, reduced intensity conditioning regimens have been developed in an attempt to reduce toxicity whilst preserving the allogeneic graft-versus-myeloma effect, therefore maintaining the potential for disease eradication. This review aims to examine the current position of allogeneic transplantation in the management of myeloma.

Efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusion in relapsed lymphoid malignancies

Aims: There is a perceived benefit associated with the administration of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in patients with lymphoid malignancies relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, it is unclear if and how this benefit varies according to specific diseases. Because administration of DLI is not universally effective and could be associated with significant toxicities resulting in morbidity and mortality, it is imperative to identify cases where benefits outweigh harms of the procedure. Materials & methods: We conducted a systematic review of the published literature and extracted and pooled data independently for each disease cohort: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). Results: In summary, 39 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion (95% CI) for complete response was 27% (16–40) in ALL, 55% (15–92) in CLL, 26% (19–33) in MM, 52% (33–71) in NHL and 37% (20–56) in HL. Conclusion: Complete response rates appear higher when DLI is used for relapsed CLL and lymphomas (NHL and HL), and less pronounced in ALL or MM. Absence of data pertaining to disease-specific prognostic determinants, such as adverse genetic or molecular abnormalities, or quantitative disease burden when applicable, limit our ability to identify cases in whom benefits from DLI outweigh risks associated with the procedure within a particular disease.

Monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapy for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a life-threatening hematological malignancy. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is a relatively effective treatment, but disease recurrence remains a major obstacle. Allogeneic transplantation may result in durable responses and cure due to antitumor immunity mediated by donor lymphocytes. However, morbidity and mortality related to graft-versus-host disease remain a challenge. Recent advances in understanding the interaction between the immune system of the patient and the malignant cells are influencing the design of clinically more efficient study protocols for MM. This review will focus on MM antigens and their specific antibodies. These monoclonal antibodies are an attractive therapeutic tool for MM humoral immunotherapy, with most promising preclinical results.

WT1-specific T-cell responses in high-risk multiple myeloma patients undergoing allogeneic T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusions

While the emergence of WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (WT1-CTL) has been correlated with better relapse-free survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myeloid leukemias, little is known about the role of these cells in multiple myeloma (MM). We examined the significance of WT1-CTL responses in patients with relapsed MM and high-risk cytogenetics who were undergoing allogeneic T cell-depleted hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloTCD-HSCT) followed by donor lymphocyte infusions. Of 24 patients evaluated, all exhibited WT1-CTL responses before allogeneic transplantation. These T-cell frequencies were universally correlated with pretransplantation disease load. Ten patients received low-dose donor lymphocyte infusions beginning 5 months after transplantation. All patients subsequently developed increments of WT1-CTL frequencies that were associated with reduction in specific myeloma markers, in the absence of graft-versus-host disease. Immunohistochemical analyses of WT1 and CD138 in bone marrow specimens demonstrated consistent coexpression within malignant plasma cells. WT1 expression in the bone marrow correlated with disease outcome. Our results suggest an association between the emergence of WT1-CTL and graft-versus-myeloma effect in patients treated for relapsed MM after alloTCD-HSCT and donor lymphocyte infusions, supporting the development of adoptive immunotherapeutic approaches using WT1-CTL in the treatment of MM.

Durable responses after donor lymphocyte infusion for patients with residual multiple myeloma following non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant

The role of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in mediating the graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is not clearly defined. We evaluated the safety and utility of DLI in patients with either persistent or recurrent multiple myeloma (MM) after allo-HCT. Twenty-three patients with MM received DLI after allo-HCT at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between July 1996 and June 2008. Eight patients received preemptive DLI for residual disease (RD) while 15 patients received DLI for the treatment of recurrent or progressive disease (PD). We evaluated the response to DLI and the factors that may predict a response. Median DLI dose was 3.3 × 10(7) CD3 + cells (range 0.5-14.8 × 10(7)). Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was seen in five patients (22%). Median follow-up in surviving patients was 24 months. Five of 23 patients (22%) achieved a complete or a very good partial response (two CR, three VGPR), while eight patients (34%) had stable disease (SD) after the DLI. Patients who received DLI for RD had a higher response rate (≥ VGPR 50% vs. 7%, p = 0.03), a longer overall survival (28.3 vs. 7.6 months, p = 0.03) and a trend toward longer progression-free survival (11.9 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.1). In this largest single institution study, we conclude that the use of preemptive, non-manipulated DLI for RD after reduced-intensity conditioning allo-HCT is encouraging, and it was associated with a higher response rate and a longer overall survival when given preemptively. The role of DLI needs to be further explored in prospective clinical trials.

Novel strategies for immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: previous experience and future directions

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a life-threatening haematological malignancy for which standard therapy is inadequate. Autologous stem cell transplantation is a relatively effective treatment, but residual malignant sites may cause relapse. Allogeneic transplantation may result in durable responses due to antitumour immunity mediated by donor lymphocytes. However, morbidity and mortality related to graft-versus-host disease remain a challenge. Recent advances in understanding the interaction between the immune system of the patient and the malignant cells are influencing the design of clinically more efficient study protocols for MM. Cellular immunotherapy using specific antigen-presenting cells (APCs), to overcome aspects of immune incompetence in MM patients, has received great attention, and numerous clinical trials have evaluated the potential for dendritic cell (DC) vaccines as a novel immunotherapeutic approach. This paper will summarize the data investigating aspects of immunity concerning MM, immunotherapy for patients with MM, and strategies, on the way, to target the plasma cell more selectively. We also include the MM antigens and their specific antibodies that are of potential use for MM humoral immunotherapy, because they have demonstrated the most promising preclinical results.

Predictors of prolonged survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

A total of 149 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with myeloablative (MAC; n = 38) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 110) regimens at MD Anderson Cancer Center were evaluated. Of the total, 120 (81%) patients had relapsed or had refractory disease. Median age of MM patients was 50 (28-70) years with a followup time of 28.5 (3-164) months. The 100-day and 5-year treatment related mortality (TRM) rates were 17% and 47%, respectively. TRM was significantly lower with RIC regimens (13%) vs. 29% for MAC at 100 days (P = 0.012). The cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 35% and chronic GVHD was 46%. PFS and OS at 5 years were 15% and 21%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, allo-HCT for primary remission consolidation was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67) and OS (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.55), while absence of high-risk cytogenetics was associated with longer PFS only (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.95). We observe that TRM has decreased with the use of RIC regimens, and long-term disease control can be expected in a subset of MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Further studies should be conducted in carefully designed clinical trials in this patient population.

Advances in the autologous and allogeneic transplantation strategies for multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma is largely an incurable malignant plasma cell neoplasm; however, the landscape of its treatment is rapidly changing.

METHODS

The recent literature on both autologous and allogeneic transplant approaches for multiple myeloma was reviewed.

RESULTS

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains an integral component of upfront treatment strategy, and the incorporation of novel immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitor to induction regimens improves response rates and increases overall survivals. Bortezomib and lenalidomide-based combination chemotherapy regimens have become the standard induction myeloma therapy. When myeloma patients proceed to transplant after novel combination regimens, their response rates are further improved. Despite these recent major improvements, myeloma remains incurable and long-term survival appears elusive. Due in part to a potential graft-vs-myeloma effect, allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative transplant option. However, initial attempts have been hampered by the high transplant-related mortality. With a reduction of toxicity, allogeneic transplant approaches with reduced-intensity conditioning have been utilized, although they are subject to continued disease progression and relapse following transplantation. Recent research efforts have shifted to the use of a tandem autologous-allogeneic HCT approach. The long-term follow-up of this new strategy is awaited.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances in HCT have improved outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma. Ongoing research activity focuses on the strategies to improve outcomes of HCT by incorporation of tandem autologous-allogeneic transplantation schema, novel conditioning regimens, and the use of consolidation and maintenance therapy.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma relapsed after autograft: a multicenter retrospective study based on donor availability

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is a feasible procedure in selected patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), but its efficacy remains a matter of debate. The mortality and morbidity related to the procedure and the rather high relapse risk make the use of allo-SCT controversial. In addition, the availability of novel antimyeloma treatments, such as bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents, have made allo-SCT less appealing to clinicians. We investigated the role of RIC allo-SCT in patients with MM who relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation and were then treated with a salvage therapy based on novel agents. This study was structured similarly to an intention-to-treat analysis and included only those patients who underwent HLA typing immediately after the relapse. Patients with a donor (donor group) and those without a suitable donor (no-donor group) were compared. A total of 169 consecutive patients were evaluated retrospectively in a multicenter study. Of these, 75 patients found a donor and 68 (91%) underwent RIC allo-SCT, including 24 from an HLA-identical sibling (35%) and 44 from an unrelated donor (65%). Seven patients with a donor did not undergo allo-SCT for progressive disease or concomitant severe comorbidities. The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 22% in the donor group and 1% in the no-donor group (P < .0001). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 42% in the donor group and 18% in the no-donor group (P < .0001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 54% in the donor group and 53% in the no-donor group (P = .329). In multivariate analysis, lack of a donor was a significant unfavorable factor for PFS, but not for OS. Lack of chemosensitivity after salvage treatment and high-risk karyotype at diagnosis significantly shortened OS. In patients who underwent allo-SCT, the development of chronic graft-versus-host disease had a significant protective effect on OS. This study provides evidence for a significant PFS benefit of salvage treatment with novel drugs followed by RIC allo-SCT in patients with relapsed MM who have a suitable donor.

Evolving role of high dose stem cell therapy in multiple myeloma

Conventional chemotherapy has been used in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However the development of autologous stem cell transplant represented a major advance in its therapy. Complete response (CR) rates to the tune of 40-45% were seen and this translated into improvements in progression-free survival and also overall survival in some studies. As a result the autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) is the standard of care in eligible patients and can be carried out with low treatment-related mortality. Allogenic transplant carries the potential for cure but the high mortality associated with the myeloablative transplant has made it unpopular. Reduced Intensity Stem Cell Transplants (RIST) have been tried with varying success but with a high degree of morbidity as compared to the ASCT. Introduction of newer agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and liposomal doxorubicin into the induction regimens has resulted in higher CR and very good partial response rates (VGPR) as well as improvement in ease of administration. These drugs have also proved useful in patients with adverse cytogenetics. Recent trials suggest that this has translated into improvements in response rates post-ASCT. There is a suggestion that patients achieving CR/nCR or VGPR after induction therapy should be placed on maintenance and ASCT then could be used as a treatment strategy at relapse. All these trends however await confirmation from further trials. Tandem transplants have been used to augment the results obtained with ASCT and have demonstrated their utility in patients who achieved only a partial response or stable disease in response to the first transplant as well as patients with adverse cytogenetics. Incorporation of bortezomib along with melphalan into the conditioning regimen has also been tried. RIST following ASCT has been tried with varying success but does not offer any major advantage over ASCT and is associated with higher morbidity. It is hoped that recent advances in therapy will contribute greatly to improved survival.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a concise review

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can result in reliable donor engraftment, relatively low treatment-related mortality, and sustained remissions in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, substantial cytoreduction pre-allografting is often necessary because of a variable graft-versus-myeloma effect. The use of RIC allogeneic HSCT immediately after autologous HSCT provides a temporal separation between tumor reduction by high-dose chemotherapy and the graft-versus-myeloma effect. There are currently a number of prospective trials attempting to address the issue of whether this strategy leads to decreases in relapse and/or improvement in overall survival as compared with double autologous transplants. Unfortunately, similar to autografting, relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after RIC allogeneic HSCT. To improve treatment results with allografting, consideration should be given to incorporating immunomodulatory drugs and targeted treatments to enhance pretransplantation remission status, as posttransplantation maintenance therapy, or in combination with donor lymphocyte infusions for refractory or relapsed disease. Studies exploring these strategies are ongoing.

Unrelated stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in treatment of myeloma patients is still controversial. Meanwhile, the numbers of unrelated SCT for hematological diseases in Europe are higher than for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling transplantations, but in multiple myeloma only 39% of the allogeneic transplantations are performed from unrelated donors and only a minority were done within prospective clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The few published data of unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma reported a higher treatment-related mortality for standard myeloablative conditioning in comparison to reduced-intensity conditioning. Despite the heterogeneous patient selection in the trial, lower nonrelapse mortality and improved survival can be achieved by careful donor selection (10/10 HLA-alleles, male donor). Natural killer-alloreactivity might play a role, but conclusive data are lacking. Transplantation in more advanced or refractory patients is associated with an inferior outcome. The results of an unrelated SCT seem to be comparable to those of HLA-identical siblings, but a direct comparison is lacking so far.

SUMMARY

Unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma is feasible, but prospective clinical trials using unrelated stem cell donors are urgently needed to define the role of an unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the treatment of choice for many malignant hematological disorders. Following recent improvements in non-relapse-related mortality rates, relapse has become the commonest cause of treatment failure. Infusion of donor lymphocytes can potentially enhance immune-mediated antitumor activity and offers a salvage option for some patients. This paper reviews the current literature on the efficacy of this therapeutic strategy.

AREAS COVERED

The biology of adoptive cellular therapy with allogeneic immune cells to treat relapse across a spectrum of diseases in both the full intensity and reduced intensity hematopoietic SCT settings is explored. The review discusses the current limitations of the approach and reviews several new experimental strategies which aim to segregate the desired graft-versus-tumor effect from the deleterious effects of more widespread graft-versus-host reactivity.

EXPERT OPINION

Durable responses to DLI have been noted in chronic myeloid leukemia and responses have also been described in acute leukemia, multiple myeloma and chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. The new challenge in transplantation is to optimize DLI therapy in order to further improve patient outcomes.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT.

NCI First International Workshop on The Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: report from the committee on prevention of relapse following allogeneic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

Prevention of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the most likely approach to improve survival of patients treated for hematologic malignancies. Herein we review the limits of currently available transplant therapies and the innovative strategies being developed to overcome resistance to therapy or to fill therapeutic modalities not currently available. These novel strategies include nonimmunologic therapies, such as targeted preparative regimens and posttransplant drug therapy, as well as immunologic interventions, including graft engineering, donor lymphocyte infusions, T cell engineering, vaccination, and dendritic cell-based approaches. Several aspects of the biology of the malignant cells as well as the host have been identified that obviate success of even these newer strategies. To maximize the potential for success, we recommend pursuing research to develop additional targeted therapies to be used in the preparative regimen or as maintenance posttransplant, better characterize the T cell and dendritic cells subsets involved in graft-versus-host disease and the graft-versus-leukemia/tumor effect, identify strategies for timing immunologic or nonimmunologic therapies to eliminate the noncycling cancer stem cell, identify more targets for immunotherapies, develop new vaccines that will not be limited by HLA, and develop methods to identify populations at very high risk for relapse to accelerate clinical development and avoid toxicity in patients not at risk for relapse.

EPOCH-F: a novel salvage regimen for multiple myeloma before reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

There exists a need for effective salvage regimens for multiple myeloma patients being considered for reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (RI-alloHSCT). We developed EPOCH-F, a regimen consisting of infusional etoposide, VCR and adriamycin with prednisone, CY and fludarabine to achieve both tumor control and host lymphocyte depletion to facilitate engraftment before RI-alloHSCT. In all, 22 multiple myeloma patients were treated with EPOCH-F before RI-alloHSCT. The median age was 53 years (range 36-65), and the median number of previous therapies was 2 (range 1-8). Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1-5) of EPOCH-F. Toxicities were primarily hematologic and manageable. Median lymphocyte counts decreased from 1423/μL (range 335-2788) to 519/μL (range 102-1420; P=0.0002). The overall response (≥PR) to EPOCH-F was 22 with 13% achieving a CR/near-complete response (nCR); only 1 patient progressed while on therapy. A total of 20 patients underwent RI-alloHSCT. Median day +100 donor chimerism was 100% (range 60-100). In all, 70% of patients achieved very good partial response or better response after transplant; 40% of patients achieved CR/nCR. TRM at 100 days and 5 years was 5 and 30%, respectively. Median OS after RI-alloHSCT was 46.1 months. EPOCH-F provides disease control and host lymphocyte depletion with consistent full donor engraftment in multiple myeloma patients undergoing RI-alloHSCT.

Role of allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs

High-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell rescue has been regarded as the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma up to the age of 65–70 years. The recent development of agents with potent anti-tumor activity such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib has further improved overall survival and response rates. However, relapse is a continuous risk.

Allografting is a potentially curative treatment for a subset of multiple myeloma patients for its well documented graft-vs-myeloma effects. However, its role has been hotly debated. Even though molecular remissions have been reported up to 50% after high-dose myeloablative conditionings, their applications, given the high toxicity, have been for long limited to younger relapsed/refractory patients. These limitations have greatly been reduced through the introduction of non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditionings.

The introduction of new drugs, characterised by low risks of early mortality, indeed requires to define role and timing of an allograft to capture the subset of patients who may most benefit from graft-vs-myeloma effects.

Ultimately, new drugs should not be viewed as mutually exclusive with an allograft. They may be employed to achieve profound cytoreduction before and enhance graft-versus-myeloma effects as consolidation/maintenance therapy after an allograft. However, this combination should be explored only in well-designed clinical trials.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma beyond 2010

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the gold standard in the frontline therapy of younger patients with multiple myeloma because it results in higher complete remission (CR) rates and longer event-free survival than conventional chemotherapy. The greatest benefit from ASCT is obtained in patients achieving CR after transplantation, the likelihood of CR being associated with the M-protein size at the time of transplantation. The incorporation of novel agents results in higher pre- and posttransplantation CR rates. Induction with bortezomib-containing regimens is encouraging in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the impact of this increased CR on long-term survival. The results of posttransplantation consolidation/maintenance with new drugs are encouraging. All this indicates that, in the era of novel agents, high-dose therapy should be optimized rather than replaced. Because of its high transplantation-related mortality, myeloablative allografting has been generally replaced by reduced-intensity conditioning (reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation). The best results are achieved after a debulky ASCT, with a progression-free survival plateau of 25% to 30% beyond 6 years from reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation. The development of novel reduced-intensity preparative regimens and peri- and posttransplantation strategies aimed at minimizing graft-versus-host disease, and enhancing the graft-versus-myeloma effect are key issues.

Immunotherapy for epstein-barr virus-related lymphomas

Latent EBV infection is associated with several malignancies, including EBV post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and Burkitt lymphoma. The range of expression of latent EBV antigens varies in these tumors, which influences how susceptible the tumors are to immunotherapeutic approaches. Tumors expressing type III latency, such as in LPD, express the widest array of EBV antigens making them the most susceptible to immunotherapy. Treatment strategies for EBV-related tumors include restoring normal cellular immunity by adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-specific T cells and targeting the malignant B cells with monoclonal antibodies. We review the current immunotherapies and future studies aimed at targeting EBV antigen expression in these tumors.

Autologous-allogeneic tandem stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

The decrease in treatment-related mortality by using reduced intensity conditioning and the well-proven immunological effect of the graft to multiple myeloma cells has increased the interest in using allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. The concept of a cytoreductive autograft followed by a dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation appears to be the most promising approach. Preliminary reports of several groups observed a treatment-related mortality at 1 year ranged from 0-17%. The rate of acute graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD) grade II-IV ranged from 32-44% and of chronic GvHD from 28-64%. The overall response rates for all studies ranged from 68-83%, including a high rate of complete remissions of 52-83%. The overall survival at 2 or 3 years was between 62% and 78%, and the progression-free survival between 54% and 56%. Despite the high rate of complete remissions after autologous-allogeneic tandem transplantation observed in nearly all trials, the relapse rate is quite considerable and exceeded nearly 40% at 2 years. Therefore, the reduced allogeneic treatment approach in patients with multiple myeloma has still to be improved and further preclinical and clinical research is focused on two major issues: (i) to further reduce treatment-related mortality and (ii) to enhance the remission status after transplantation, via adoptive immunotherapy inducing molecular remission and enhancing the cure rate of this approach.

Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue has been regarded as the standard of care for young newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Moreover, the development of new agents with potent anti-tumor activity has further improved survival. However, relapse is a continuous risk primarily due to the inability of current therapies to eradicate all myeloma cells. Allografting is the only potentially curative treatment at least for a subset of multiple myeloma patients due to its well documented graft-versus-myeloma effects. Given the high transplant mortality of the high-dose myeloablative conditionings used until recently, allografting has for a long time been limited to younger relapsed/refractory patients. These limitations have been reduced significantly by the use of reduced-intensity conditionings. Although results of recent trials are encouraging, the subset of patients who may benefit most from an allograft remains to be determined. An overview of the clinical outcomes obtained with allografting and possible future developments are reported.

Post-transplant immunotherapy with donor-lymphocyte infusion and novel agents to upgrade partial into complete and molecular remission in allografted patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate post-transplant immunotherapy with escalating donor-lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide) to target complete remission (CR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with multiple myeloma who achieved only partial remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation were treated with DLI. If no CR was achieved, one of the novel agents was added to target CR.

RESULTS

CR defined either by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria, flow cytometry, or molecular methods as assessed by patient-specific immunoglobulin H-polymerase chain reaction or plasma cell chimerism polymerase chain reaction was accomplished in 59%, 63%, and 50% of patients, respectively. Achievement of CR resulted in improved 5-year progressive-free and overall survival, according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (53% vs 35%; p=0.03 and 90% vs 62%; p=0.06), flow cytometry (74% vs 15%; p=0.001 and 100% vs 52%; p=0.1), or molecular methods (84% vs 38%; p=0.001 and 100% vs 71%; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding demonstrates the clinical relevance of posttransplantation therapies to upgrade remission, and of remission's depth for long-term survival in myeloma patients.

Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes

Allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic cells is an effective treatment of leukemia, even in advanced stages. Allogeneic lymphocytes produce a strong graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, but the beneficial effect is limited by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Depletion of T cells abrogates GVHD and GVL effects. Delayed transfusion of donor lymphocytes into chimeras after T cell-depleted stem cell transplantation produces a GVL effect without necessarily producing GVHD. Chimerism and tolerance provide a platform for immunotherapy using donor lymphocytes. The allogeneic GVL effects vary from one disease to another, the stage of the disease, donor histocompatibility, the degree of chimerism, and additional treatment. Immunosuppressive therapy before donor lymphocyte transfusions may augment the effect as well as concomitant cytokine treatment. Possible target antigens are histocompatibility antigens and tumor-associated antigens. Immune escape of tumor cells and changes in the reactivity of T cells are to be considered. Durable responses may be the result of the elimination of leukemia stem cells or the establishment of a durable immune control on their progeny. Recently, we have learned from adoptive immunotherapy of viral diseases and HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation that T-cell memory may be essential for the effective treatment of leukemia and other malignancies.

Donor lymphocyte infusions: the long and winding road: how should it be traveled?

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) often are used after allo-SCT to augment the graft-versus-tumor effect. Timing of infusion varies according to indication, for example to treat tumor recurrence, as a planned strategy to prevent disease relapse in the setting of T-cell-depleted grafts or non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, or as a method to convert mixed to full donor chimerism. The optimal strategy of timing, use of cytotoxic conditioning, cell dose and cell product composition, and so on, for DLI administration remains unclear. Despite varied techniques, DLI may lead to 3-year disease-free survivals (DFS) in excess of 60% for all CML patients and approach 90% in patients with only molecular or cytogenetic relapse. Other hematologic malignancies appear much less responsive, as less than 50% of patients respond and provide, at best, 3-year DFS rates of 20-50%. Multiple myeloma patients have overall response rates of 40-45% after DLI, suggesting benefit in relapsed disease, but limited experiences for diseases such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, myelodysplasia and ALL preclude recommendations for use of DLI at this time. Regardless of the indication, treatment-related mortality after DLI is 5-20% and more than one-third of patients will develop acute and/or chronic GVHD after DLI. The risks of these complications appear related, in part, to donor source, cell dose and therapy prior to DLI. Although there are no definitive answers, the information gleaned from published literature suggests that DLI should be administered early after relapse or as a prophylactic strategy in patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts, and patients with bulky or aggressive disease may benefit from disease reduction prior to DLI.

Alemtuzumab in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic lymphoma

Alemtuzumab was the first monoclonal antibody to be humanized, a process which embeds rodent sequence fragments in a human IgG framework. The antibody target is CD52, an antigen expressed on normal lymphocytes as well as many T- and B-cell neoplasms. It therefore has a potential broad application across a spectrum of B- and T-cell malignancies as well as use as an immunosuppressant drug in, for example, bone marrow transplantation. The original licensing in the USA and Europe was for the treatment of fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, recent trials using alemtuzumab as a first-line agent for CLL have shown superior response rates compared with traditional alkylator therapy and this has led to US FDA approval for first-line treatment for CLL. It seems to be particularly useful in patients with CLL who have deletion of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene, a subset of disease that responds poorly to other currently available chemotherapeutics.

Role of stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was introduced in the treatment of multiple myeloma in the 1980s. In the autologous setting, the use of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow has markedly improved feasibility. In fit patients who have normal renal function and are younger than 65 years of age, randomized studies have shown the superiority of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) compared with conventional chemotherapy. ASCT is now considered the standard of care in this population of patients. It is currently challenged, however, by the introduction of novel agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide. The role of allogenic SCT remains controversial, even with reduced intensity conditionings. Prospective studies still are needed to evaluate the impact of both autologous and allogeneic SCT in this new era.

Is there still a role for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma?

Despite significant improvements in survival for multiple myeloma patients through autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT) and the introduction of novel drugs, the disease remains incurable for all but a small fraction of patients. Only allogeneic SCT is potentially curative, due in part to a graft-versus-myeloma effect. High transplant-related mortality with allogeneic SCT is currently the major limitation to wider use of this potentially curative modality. Mortality can be reduced through the use of lower-intensity conditioning regimens which allow engraftment of allogeneic stem cells, but this comes at a cost of higher rates of disease progression and relapse. Promising studies to improve outcomes of allogeneic transplants include the use of more intensive non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, tandem transplants, peripheral blood cells, graft engineering to improve the graft-versus-myeloma activity while reducing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), post-transplant maintenance, and targeted conditioning therapies such as bone-seeking radioisotopes.

The allogeneic dilemma

The place of allogeneic SCT in the management of multiple myeloma remains controversial. Although it may induce long-term clinical and molecular remissions, the very high transplant-related toxicity after a myeloablative preparative regimen has limited its role to younger patients as first-line treatment option. Even with this limited indication, toxic death rate related to infections and GVHD is considered too high and this strategy has been almost abandoned. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens look promising, as the transplant-related mortality is low even with matched unrelated donors and can be considered for older patients up to the age of 65 years. However when used in patients with a high tumor burden or with chemo-resistant disease, the immunologic effect of the graft is not sufficient to avoid relapses. Therefore, RIC allotransplantation is currently used after tumor mass reduction with high-dose therapy followed by autologous SCT. A recently published Italian study shows that this strategy induces better event-free survival than double autologous SCT due to a reduced relapse rate. The questions raised by this encouraging result are discussed in this paper.

Risk assessment in haemotopoietic stem cell transplantation: disease and disease stage

This chapter addresses the impact of the disease and disease status on the outcome of stem-cell transplantation. In consideration of the other topics addressed within this volume we have elected to focus on allogeneic rather than autologous transplantation. Furthermore we have not tried to be comprehensive and discuss the role of disease status in all conditions amenable to allografting, but rather to review the evidence that exists for selected haematological malignancies. Where possible we have made some clear recommendations, but where evidence is less clear we have indicated the ongoing controversies.

Mini-Midi-Maxi? How to harness the graft-versus-myeloma effect and target molecular remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma after standard myeloablative conditioning induces a high rate of complete remissions, but long-term freedom from disease is achieved in 30-40% of the cases only. The therapeutic effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation is due to cytotoxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and immune-mediated graft-versus-myeloma effect by donor T cells. Retrospective studies clearly suggest that both (a) reducing the intensity of high-dose chemotherapy by using reduced-intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning regimen or (b) reducing the immunotherapy of donor T cells by using T-cell depletion result in lower treatment-related morbidity and mortality, but also in higher rate of relapse. Therefore, this review will focus on potential strategies of how treatment-related morbidity and mortality might be kept low without an increased risk of relapse and how remission status after transplantation can be enhanced by using the newly established donor immunosystems after allografting as a platform for post-transplant treatment strategies with new drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) or immunotherapy (donor lymphocyte infusion, vaccination, tumor-specific T cells) in order to achieve remission on a molecular level, which seems to be a 'conditio sine qua non' to cure myeloma patients.

T cell therapies following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: surely there must be a better way than DLI?

Advances in the past few years have significantly improved adoptive immunotherapy strategies available following autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Minimal residual disease, relapsed disease and viral infections remain a significant cause of mortality in patients undergoing HSCT. Novel therapies are critically needed to overcome these management dilemmas, while sparing the graft-versus-tumor effect and avoiding graft-versus-host disease. This review focuses on the T-cell strategies currently available to allay disease while minimizing toxicities in patients who have undergone HSCT.

Nonmyeloablative unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation to treat patients with poor-risk, relapsed, or refractory multiple myeloma

The purpose of this study was to determine long-term outcome of unrelated donor nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with poor-risk multiple myeloma. A total of 24 patients were enrolled; 17 patients (71%) had chemotherapy-refractory disease, and 14 (58%) experienced disease relapse or progression after previous autologous transplantation. Thirteen patients underwent planned autologous transplantation followed 43-135 days later with unrelated transplantation, whereas 11 proceeded directly to unrelated transplantation. All 24 patients were treated with fludarabine (90 mg/m(2)) and 2 Gy of total body irradiation before HLA-matched unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Postgrafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The median follow-up was 3 years after allografting. One patient experienced nonfatal graft rejection. The incidences of acute grades II and III and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 54%, 13%, and 75%, respectively. The 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 21%. Complete responses were observed in 10 patients (42%); partial responses, in 4 (17%). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61% and 33%, respectively. Patients receiving tandem autologous-unrelated transplantation had superior OS and PFS (77% and 51%) compared with patients proceeding directly to unrelated donor transplantation (44% and 11%) (PFS P value = .03). In summary, for patients with poor-risk, relapsed, or refractory multiple myeloma, cytoreductive autologous HCT followed by nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated HCT is an effective treatment approach, with low NRM, high complete remission rates, and prolonged disease-free survival.

The current status of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Of all the treatment modalities employed to control multiple myeloma, only allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is potentially curative, due in large part to a graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect. Whereas patients who receive either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma have similar 3-5-year survival, only allograft recipients appear to enjoy long-term disease-free survival. High transplant-related mortality (TRM) associated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the major limitation to wider use of this potentially curative modality. This high mortality has been the major impetus for exploration of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens designed to allow engraftment of allogeneic stem cells. With follow-up now extending to 7 years, it is clear that when compared to myeloablative transplants, RIC allografts are associated with lower TRM; however, reduced mortality comes at a cost of higher rates of disease progression and relapse. Strategies designed to improve the therapeutic index of allografts include the use of more intensive, yet still non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, tandem autologous plus RIC allografts, peripheral blood cells rather than bone marrow, graft engineering to improve the GVM activity while reducing graft-versus-host disease, post-transplant maintenance and targeted conditioning therapies such as bone-seeking radioisotopes.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: reducing transplant-related mortality while harnessing the graft-versus-myeloma effect

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) provides effective therapy for patients with various haematological malignancies. In multiple myeloma (MM) this approach can induce response rates in 35-75% of patients. However, the outcome is hampered by high rates of treatment-related mortality (TRM). Reduced intensity conditioning to lower TRM has been successfully applied. The fact that previous clinical reports have documented graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) activity without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) suggests that at least two distinct immunocompetent cell populations mediating GVHD and/or GVM may exist. Further characterization of effectors after allo-HCT and their targets may help to clarify the immune response that mediates the GVM effect. This review considers the clinical results with myeloablative and reduced intensity conditioning prior to allo-HCT for MM, with emphasis on attempts to prevent GVHD while preserving the GVM effect. Strategies including donor lymphocyte infusions as part of the allogeneic protocol and antigenic targets for GVM effect are reviewed.

Antithymocyte globulin induces complement-dependent cell lysis and caspase-dependent apoptosis in myeloma cells

OBJECTIVE

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Polyclonal antithymocyte globulins (ATG) or monoclonal anti-CD52 (Alemtuzumab) are included in conditioning regimens to enhance engraftment and reduce risk of severe graft-vs-host disease. Because both agents have been reported to induce depletion of B cells, we sought to investigate their cytotoxic activity on myeloma cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Complement-mediated and complement-independent activity of ATG-Fresenius and Alemtuzumab was investigated on four myeloma cell lines (RPMI-8226, U266, KMS-12-BM, and EJM) and bone marrow samples from six myeloma patients. Cytotoxicity was determined by staining with annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate and 7-amino-actinomycin D followed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

ATG at a concentration of 500 microg mL(-1) induced up to 100% and 85% complement-dependent killing of myeloma cell lines and primary myeloma samples respectively. In the absence of complement ATG still could induce up to 50% and 80% apoptosis in myeloma cell lines and primary myeloma samples, respectively. Preincubation of myeloma cells with a general caspase inhibitor abrogated ATG-induced complement-independent cell death. Alemtuzumab-mediated myeloma cytotoxicity was only observed in KMS-12-BM cells, and in none of the patient samples.

CONCLUSION

ATG induces marked cytotoxic activity both in myeloma cell lines and in primary myeloma samples. Further elucidation of antibodies and antigens involved may pave the way for antibody-based myeloma therapy.

Current status of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was originally developed as a form of rescue from high-dose chemoradiotherapy, which is given both to eradicate malignancy and provide sufficient immunosuppression for allogeneic engraftment. However, it was observed that allogeneic immunocompetent cells transplanted with the stem cells, or arising from them, mediated therapeutic antitumor effects independent of the action of the high-dose therapy. This was termed a graft-versus-tumor effect. This has prompted the recent development of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that have opened the way to include elderly patients and those with comorbid conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent retrospective studies comparing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative or nonmyeloablative regimens suggested that the use of nonmyeloablative conditioning might be associated with lower transplant-related toxicity, lower nonrelapse mortality, and at least similar intermediate-term progression-free survival.

SUMMARY

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning might become the procedure of choice also for younger patients. Phase 3 studies are needed to determine outcomes for different diseases and age groups.