Randomized trial of regional plus systemic fluorinated pyrimidine compared with systemic fluorinated pyrimidine in treatment of colorectal liver metastases

A Modified Floxuridine Reduced-Dose Protocol for Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with Hepatic Arterial Infusion

BACKGROUND

Most patients treated with the standard dosing protocol (SDP) of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) floxuridine require dose holds and reductions, thereby limiting their HAI therapy. We hypothesized that a modified dosing protocol (MDP) with a reduced floxuridine starting dose would decrease dose holds, dose reductions, and have similar potential to convert patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM) to resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed our institutional database of patients with uCRLM treated with HAI between 2016 and 2022. In 2019, we modified the floxuridine starting dose to 50% (0.06 mg/kg) of the SDP (0.12 mg/kg). We compared treatment related outcomes between the SDP and MDP cohorts.

RESULTS

Of n = 33 patients, 15 (45%) were treated on the SDP and 18 (55%) with our new institutional MDP. The MDP cohort completed more cycles before a dose reduction (mean 4.2 vs. 2), received more overall cycles (median 7.5 vs. 5), and averaged 39 more days of treatment (all P < 0.05). The SDP experienced more dose reductions (1.4 vs. 0.61) and dose holds (1.2 vs. 0.2; both P < 0.01). Of the patients in each group potentially convertible to hepatic resection, three patients (23%) in the SDP and six patients (35%) in the MDP group converted to resection (P = 0.691). Overall, four patients (27%) in the SDP developed treatment ending biliary toxicity compared with one patient (6%) in the MDP.

CONCLUSIONS

A 50% starting dose of HAI floxuridine provides fewer treatment disruptions, more consecutive floxuridine cycles, and a similar potential to convert patients with initially uCRLM for disease clearance.

Safety and feasibility of initiating a hepatic artery infusion pump chemotherapy program for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy is a specialized therapy for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM). Its effectiveness was demonstrated from a high volume center, with uncertainty regarding the feasibility and safety at other centers. Therefore, we sought to assess the safety and feasibility of HAIP for the management of uCRLM at other centers.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with uCRLM treated with HAIP from January 2003 to December 2017 at six North American centers initiating the HAIP program. Outcomes included the safety and feasibility of HAIP chemotherapy.

RESULTS

We identified 154 patients with HAIP insertion and the median age of 54 (48-61) years. The burden of disease was >10 intra-hepatic metastatic foci in 59 (38.3%) patients. Patients received at least one cycle of systemic chemotherapy before HAIP insertion. Major complications occurred in 7 (4.6%) patients during their hospitalization and 13 (8.4%) patients developed biliary sclerosis during follow-up. A total of 148 patients (96.1%) received at least one-dose of HAIP chemotherapy with a median of 5 (4-7) cycles. 78 patients (56.5%) had a complete or partial response and 12 (7.8%) received a curative liver resection.

CONCLUSION

HAIP programs can be safely and effectively initiated in previously inexperienced centers with good response.

Role of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Treatment of Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Review

Importance

Although liver metastasis develops in more than half of patients with colorectal cancer, only 15% to 20% of these patients have resectable liver metastasis at presentation. Moreover, patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (IU-CRLM) who progress on first-line systemic chemotherapy have limited treatment options. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), in combination with systemic chemotherapy, leverages a multimodality approach to achieving control of hepatic disease and/or expanding resectability in patients with liver-only disease or liver-dominant disease.

Observations

Intra-arterial delivery of agents with high first-pass hepatic extraction (eg, floxuridine) limits systemic toxic effects and allows for administration of systemic chemotherapy at near-full doses. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy augments response rates up to 92% in patients who are chemotherapy naive, and up to 85% in pretreated patients with IU-CRLM. In turn, these responses translate into encouraging rates of conversion to resectability (CTR). Prospective trials have reported CTR rates as high as 52% in heavily pretreated patients with IU-CRLM who have an extensive hepatic disease burden. As such, CTR remains a compelling indication for liver-directed chemotherapy in this subset of patients. This review discusses the biological rationale for HAIC, evolution of rational combinations with systemic chemotherapy, contemporary evidence for CTR using HAIC and systemic chemotherapy, juxtaposition with rates of CTR using systemic chemotherapy alone, and morbidity and toxic effect profiles of HAIC.

Conclusions and Relevance

The argument is made for consideration of earlier initiation of HAIC in patients with IU-CRLM who are chemotherapy naive and for adoption of HAIC strategies to augment rates of resectability in patients who have failed first-line systemic chemotherapy before proceeding to second-line or third-line regimens.

Cryotherapy for liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is affected by two of the most common groups of malignant tumours: primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer and long-term survival rates reported for patients after radical surgical treatment is approximately 50%. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in the majority of patients. Cryotherapy is performed with the use of an image-guided cryoprobe which delivers liquid nitrogen or argon gas to the tumour tissue. The subsequent process of freezing is associated with formation of ice crystals, which directly damage exposed tissue, including cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in people with liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, and six other databases up to June 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy and its comparators for liver metastases, irrespective of the location of the primary tumour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We extracted information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes important for our review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the trials. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each study. One review author performed data extraction and a second review author checked entries.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised clinical trials comparing cryotherapy versus no intervention or versus systemic treatments; however, we identified one randomised clinical trial comparing cryotherapy with conventional surgery. The trial was conducted in Ukraine. The trial included 123 participants with solitary, or multiple unilobar or bilobar liver metastases; 63 participants received cryotherapy and 60 received conventional surgery. There were 36 women and 87 men. The primary sites for the metastases were colon and rectum (66.6%), stomach (7.3%), breast (6.5%), skin (4.9%), ovaries (4.1%), uterus (3.3%), kidney (3.3%), intestines (1.6%), pancreas (1.6%), and unknown (0.8%). The trial was not reported sufficiently enough to assess the risk of bias of the randomisation process, allocation concealment, or presence of blinding. It was also not possible to assess incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting bias. The certainty of evidence was low because of risk of bias and imprecision.The participants were followed for up to 10 years (minimum five months). The trial reported that the mortality at 10 years was 81% (51/63) in the cryotherapy group and 92% (55/60) in the conventional surgery group. The calculated by us relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02. We judged the evidence as low-certainty evidence. Regarding adverse events and complications, separately and in total, our calculation showed no evidence of a difference in recurrence of the malignancy in the liver: 86% (54/63) of the participants in the cryotherapy group and 95% (57/60) of the participants in the conventional surgery group developed a new malignancy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; low-certainty evidence). The frequency of reported complications was similar between the cryotherapy group and the conventional surgery group, except for postoperative pain. Both insignificant and pronounced pain were reported to be more common in the cryotherapy group while intense pain was reported to be more common in the conventional surgery group. However, the authors did not report whether there was any evidence of a difference. There were no intervention-related mortality or bile leakages.We identified no evidence for health-related quality of life, cancer mortality, or time to progression of liver metastases. The study reported tumour response in terms of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in 69% of participants, and reported results in the form of a graph for 30% of participants. The carcinoembryonic antigen level was lower in the cryotherapy group, and decreased to normal values faster in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05).

FUNDING

the trial did not provide information on funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the effectiveness of cryotherapy versus conventional surgery in people with liver metastases is of low certainty. We are uncertain about our estimate and cannot determine whether cryotherapy compared with conventional surgery is beneficial or harmful. We found no evidence for the benefits or harms of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, or versus systemic treatments.

The state of regional therapy in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Most colorectal cancer patients die from advanced disease, and two-thirds of CRC deaths are due to liver metastases. Liver resection provides the best curative option for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), yet only 20% of those patients are eligible for liver metastases resection for curative intent. Loco-regional treatment of CRLM may provide additional benefits in terms of down-staging for resection and prolonged hepatic disease control. This review focusses on hepatic arterial infusion, radioembolization and chemoembolization.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for liver malignancy

To date, hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy has primarily been investigated in the setting of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). Few studies have been conducted in North America regarding HAI chemotherapy for primary liver cancers (PLC) or noncolorectal liver metastases (non-CRLM). Despite decades of evaluation, controversy surrounding the use of HAI chemotherapy still exists. In this article the methods of HAI chemotherapy delivery, technical aspects of catheter and pump insertion, and specific complications of HAI chemotherapy are discussed. Outcomes of clinical trials and reviews of HAI chemotherapy in the setting of CRLM, PLC, and non-CRLM are evaluated.

Modern prospection for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in malignancies with liver metastases

Malignancy with liver metastasis plays an important role in daily oncology practice, especially for primary cancers of the gastrointestinal tract and hepatopancreatobiliary system. On account of the dual vascular supply system and the fact that most metastatic liver tumors are supplied by the hepatic artery, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an appealing method for the treatment of liver metastases. Herein, we summarize recent study results reported in the literature regarding the use of HAIC for metastatic liver tumors, with special focus on colorectal cancer.

What is the potential role of hepatic arterial infusion chemo-therapy in the current armamentorium against colorectal cancer

The management of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases is a common clinical problem. If patients can undergo resection of liver metastases, long-term survival can be achieved. Converting a patient from unresectable to resectable, however, remains a major challenge. The majority of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases recur; therefore, adjuvant treatment following resection should be considered. Emerging literature suggests that hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) can be combined with systemic chemotherapy. Both therapies can be given at nearly full doses, thus improving resectability and outcomes for patients with colorectal liver metastases. HAI plus systemic can also be a useful option for adjuvant treatment after hepatic resection.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using fluorouracil followed by systemic therapy using oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to assess retrospectively the sequential treatment of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy followed by systemic therapy using oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, namely, FOLFOX, for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. We reviewed 20 patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients were initially treated with HAI chemotherapy until disease progression (5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m(2) intra-arterial infusion, weekly) and then with FOLFOX thereafter (FOLFOX4, n = 13; modified FOLFOX6, n = 7). Adverse events, tumor response, and time to progression for each therapy were evaluated retrospectively, and overall survival was estimated. Toxicity of HAI chemotherapy was generally mild. Of 20 patients, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in only 1 patient (5%) during initial therapy using HAI chemotherapy, while 9 patients (45%) exhibited adverse events during subsequent FOLFOX therapy. For HAI chemotherapy and FOLFOX, objective response rates were 85.0% and 35.0%, respectively, and median time to progression was 11.6 and 5.1 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 30.1 months. In conclusion, the sequence of HAI chemotherapy followed by FOLFOX is a promising treatment strategy for the long-term use of active chemotherapeutic agents, leading to a superior tumor response and fewer toxic effects in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a review of medical devices complications in 3172 patients

Background

Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) is indicated to treat unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases, with recent applications as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Traditionally performed with the infusion of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, it has been now tested with oxaliplatin or irinotecan and associated with systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

To evaluate the impact of medical devices complications we carried out a search of the published studies on HAI in unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Complications were pooled according to the applied medical system: 1) surgical catheter, 2) radiological catheter, and 3) fully implantable pump. The surgical catheter is inserted into the hepatic artery from the gastro-duodenal artery. The radiological catheter is inserted into the hepatic artery through a percutaneous transfemoral or transaxillar access. The fully implantable pump is a totally internal medical device connected to the arterial hepatic catheter during laparotomy.

Results

The selection criteria were met in 47/319 studies. The complications of surgical and radiological medical devices connected to a port were found in 16 and 14 studies respectively. Meanwhile, complications with a fully implantable pump were reported in 17 studies. The total number of complications reported in studies evaluating patients with surgical or radiological catheter were 322 (322/948, 34%) and 261 (261/722, 36.1%) respectively. In studies evaluating patients with a fully implantable pump, the total number of complications was 237 (237/1502, 15.8%). In 18/319 studies the number of cycles was reported. The median number of cycles with surgically and radiologically implanted catheters was 8 and 6 respectively. The fully implantable pump allows a median number of 12 cycles.

Conclusions

The fully implantable pump, maintaining a continuous infusion through the system, allows the lowest risk for thrombosis and infection and the best median number of cycles of loco-regional chemotherapy in HAI.

A systematic review of the use of quality of life measures in colorectal cancer research with attention to outcomes in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QOL) measures are critical to the evaluation of new cancer treatments, particularly for elderly patients. Our intent was to assess patterns of use of QOL endpoints in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment research and to summarize current knowledge about how CRC treatment affects elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for English-language, human trials published from 1995 to 2005 that met the following criteria: reported on patients with CRC, were not surgery-only cohorts, and included a QOL or functional endpoints. Trials specifically reporting data on elderly patients were reviewed in depth and summarized.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one eligible studies and 10 trials with elderly-specific data were found. The median number of trials published annually increased from 5 (range, 4-8 trials) between 1995 and 1999 to 14.5 (range, 11-22 trials) between 2000 and 2005. Chemotherapy was the most commonly studied treatment (55%), and metastatic CRC (55%) was the most commonly studied population. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30, with or without C38, was the most frequently used instrument (49%). Studies reporting on elderly patients showed that many patients experience a decline in physical function immediately after surgery and have increased need for supportive services. Little information is available on the effect of chemotherapy in elderly patients. Use of QOL and functional measures in treatment-related CRC research has increased; however, it continues to be hampered by a lack of dissemination and methodologic problems.

CONCLUSION

Missing data from patient attrition, limitations of assessment methods, and a small number of patients treated with chemotherapy in the trials reporting on elderly patients seriously limit our ability to draw conclusions from this survey about how treatment affects QOL or function in CRC.

Side-hole catheter placement for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: long-term treatment and survival benefit

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospectively correlations between catheter placement methods and treatment outcomes of patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved 135 patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent intrahepatic chemotherapy using catheter-port systems. Complications, treatment discontinuation, hepatic progression, and survival of patients treated with each method were evaluated retrospectively using the Kaplan-Meier method. Conventional 5-French end-hole catheter placement (n = 10) was compared with three side-hole catheter placement methods: 5-French side-hole catheter placement with a fixed catheter tip (original fixed catheter tip method, n = 77); long tapered side-hole catheter placement using a fixed catheter tip method (modified fixed catheter tip method, n = 24); and long tapered side-hole catheter inserted distally in the hepatic artery (long tapered catheter placement method, n = 24).

RESULTS

The following treatment outcomes were significantly better for patients treated using the original or modified fixed catheter tip or long tapered catheter placement method than for those treated using the conventional method, respectively: hepatic arterial patency (1 year: 76.3%, 95.0%, and 94.4% vs 38.9%; p = 0.0014, 0.0007, and 0.0006), catheter stability (1 year: 96.7%, 95.5%, and 95.2% vs 42.9%; p < 0.0001, p = 0.0003, and p = 0.0009), time to treatment discontinuation (medians: 11.7, 14.4, and 12.4 vs 3.2 months; p < 0.0001, 0.0002, and 0.0019), time to hepatic progression (medians: 14.7, 15.7, and 15.8 vs 5.5 months; p = 0.0049, 0.0141, and 0.0004), and overall survival (medians: 21.1, 22.5, and 23.1 vs 13.1 months; p = 0.0146, 0.0036, and 0.0017).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the conventional method, side-hole catheter placement methods allowed long-term intrahepatic chemotherapy and resulted in improved survival.

Outcomes of hepatic artery infusion therapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma after radiological placement of infusion catheters

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) for patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma after radiological placement of infusion catheters.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma received radiological placement of infusion catheters using the distal fixation method. They received continuous HAI of 5FU 1,000-1,500mg for 5h weekly or biweekly. Tumor status was assessed by chest-abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan after every 10 infusions. Hepatic perfusion was checked by CT arteriography via the infusion port after every 10 infusions.

RESULTS

Radiological placements of catheters were performed successfully in all cases. Each patient received an average of 36 treatments (range: 10-98). Catheter failure was found in 3 patients (7.1%). Nine incidents of grade 1 toxicity were observed in 8 patients (19.0%). There was a complete response in 6 patients, partial remission in 18, stable disease in 9, and progression of disease in 9 (response rate: 57.1%). Overall median survival time was 29.1 months. Using Cox's proportional hazard model, lymph node metastases in primary colorectal carcinoma and pre-treatment serum CEA affected overall survival (P=0.011, P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

HAI after radiological placement of infusion catheters is a safe and effective treatment particularly for patients with no lymph node metastasis in primary carcinoma or with a low pre-treatment serum CEA level.

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment: Review of Outcomes Research

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States each year. Screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer mortality; however, compliance with screening is poor, and factors associated with its compliance are poorly understood. The outcomes of treatment of colorectal cancer (surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) may have profound effects on quality of life (QOL). Furthermore, colorectal cancer screening and treatment may be expensive, and the costs are important from a policy perspective. This review examines patient-centered outcomes research related to colorectal cancer screening and treatment and outlines the work that has been done in several areas, including patient preferences, QOL, and economic analysis.

METHODS

The literature on the health outcomes associated with colorectal cancer screening and treatment was reviewed. A MEDLINE search of English language articles published from January 1, 1990 through February 2001, was conducted and was supplemented by a review of references of obtained articles. Criteria for study inclusion were identified a priori. A standardized data abstraction form was developed. Summary statistical analyses were performed on the results.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-six articles were selected for review. In total, 530 articles were excluded because they either did not include patient-centered outcomes, were duplicate articles, or could not be obtained. There were 156 articles included in the analysis; 67 addressed screening, 18 examined surveillance of high-risk groups, 22 concerned treatment of local disease, 10 examined treatment of local and metastatic disease, and 19 considered treatment of metastatic disease only. One study examined end-of-life care. In 19 studies, the phase of care was unspecified.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized, disease-specific QOL instruments should be applied in clinical trials so that the results may be compared across different types of interventions. Valid and reliable methods that accurately capture patient preferences regarding screening and treatment should be developed.

Pharmacokinetic advantage of intra-arterial hepatic oxaliplatin administration: comparative results with cisplatin using a rabbit VX2 tumor model

The aim of this study was to compare intra-arterial hepatic administration (IAH) versus i.v. administration of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in a VX2 tumor model in rabbits. VX2 tumors were implanted in the livers of White New Zealand female rabbits and 2 weeks later they received either cisplatin (4 mg/kg) or oxaliplatin (6 mg/kg) administered by IAH or i.v. Platinum pharmacokinetic parameters were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry at baseline, 2, 5 10, 20, 40 and 60 min, and then at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after drug administration. Animals were sacrificed 24 h after drug administration to measure platinum concentrations in various tissues. After IAH oxaliplatin administration, we observed a significant decrease for total and filterable platinum in the Cmax compared with i.v. administration (12.4 versus 18.2 microg/l; p=0.02 and 11.2 versus 17.3 microg/l; p=0.02, respectively). Significant differences in various tissue concentrations were reported when comparing IAH and i.v. administration of oxaliplatin with IAH administration offering an advantage over i.v. administration. No differences in pharmacokinetic parameters or platinum tissue accumulation were apparent between the IAH and i.v. administration with cisplatin. We conclude that there is a significant pharmacokinetic advantage to using oxaliplatin for locoregional IAH chemotherapy compared with i.v. administration.

Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials

Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly reported as an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials, questions still remain about the quality of its reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of reporting of HRQOL in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2003 was undertaken on a number of databases. Identified eligible studies were selected and then evaluated on a broad set of HRQOL predetermined criteria by four reviewers. Thirty-one randomised controlled trials involving 9683 colorectal cancer patients were identified. Nearly all studies dealt with metastatic patients and principally compared different chemotherapy regimens. The HRQOL tool most often used was the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), which was used in 48% of the studies. Some methodological limitations were identified: 39% of the RCTs did not report HRQOL compliance at baseline and 52% did not give details on missing data. A rationale for using a specific HRQOL measure was given in only 10% of the studies. Whilst HRQOL assessment is a potential valuable source of information in understanding the impact of colorectal cancer, a number of methodological shortcomings have to be further addressed in future studies.

Laparoscopic in situ ablation of liver cancer with cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

In situ ablation has potential for the treatment of patients with liver cancer either as a single-modality treatment or in combination with liver resection.

METHODS

Laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasonography was used to target cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation. Thirty-eight patients with 146 liver lesions were treated between January 1995 and December 2000 using cryotherapy alone (nine patients), combined cryotherapy and radiofrequency (eight), radiofrequency alone (15) and in situ ablation with liver resection (six). Cancers treated were metastases from colorectal tumours (n = 25), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5), and neuro endocrine (n = 5), melanoma (n = 2) and renal cell (n = 1) metastases. Complications and survival after in situ ablation were compared with age- and disease-matched controls treated with systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean age was 61.6 years. At mean follow-up of 26.6 (range 3-62, median 26) months, 22 patients were alive. Survival was increased following in situ ablation compared with that in controls (P < 0.001). Local recurrence at the ablation site was noted in 12 of 44 lesions following cryotherapy and in 20 of 102 lesions after radiofrequency ablation, and new disease in the liver was found in six of 17 and six of 29 patients respectively. The complication rate was higher with cryotherapy than with radiofrequency ablation (four of 17 versus one of 29). Intraoperative ultrasonography identified 14 new hepatic lesions (10 per cent) not seen on preoperative imaging.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic in situ ablation should include ultrasonography to stage the disease. In situ ablation appears to have a survival benefit and should be considered for the treatment of liver cancer in appropriate patients.

The management of variant arterial anatomy during hepatic arterial infusion pump placement

BACKGROUND

The success of hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) placement in patients with variant arterial anatomy has not been well described.

METHODS

Patients who underwent HAIP placement over a 5-year time period were evaluated. Arterial- and catheter-related pump complication rates and pump survival were compared between patients with normal and variant arterial anatomy.

RESULTS

Pumps were placed in 265 patients. Variant anatomy was present in 98 (37%) patients. The presence of variant versus normal anatomy did not increase pump complication rates (8% vs. 4%; P =.18) or decrease pump survival (P =.12). In all patients with an isolated variant right or left hepatic artery (n = 56), ligation of the variant vessel and cannulation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) resulted in complete hepatic perfusion and no pump complications. Cannulation of vessels other than the GDA (n = 22) was associated with increased pump complication rates (27% vs. 4%; P =.0001) and decreased pump survival (P =.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, HAIP placement in patients with variant anatomy was not associated with increased pump complication rates or decreased pump survival. An optimal strategy for managing variant anatomy is to ligate isolated variant vessels and cannulate the GDA.

Hepatic-arterial chemotherapy

The liver is a common site of metastases from cancers from most sites, but particularly from the gastrointestinal tract, since the portal vein drains into the liver. About half of all patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. The response of liver metastases to systemic combination chemotherapy has improved, but the 2-year survival is only 25-30%. Hepatic-arterial infusion of chemotherapy produces higher response rates, with a 2-year survival of 50-60%. In patients who can undergo liver resection followed by hepatic-arterial infusion, the 2-year survival is 85%. This review summarises the anatomical basis, pharmacokinetic background, and cost-effectiveness of this procedure. We discuss the phase II and phase III studies of hepatic-arterial infusion therapy, with a focus on liver metastases from colorectal cancer.