A prospective study of changes in aneurysm and graft length after endovascular exclusion of AAA using balloon and self-expanding endograft systems

Serial CT Volume and Thrombus Length Measurements after Endovascular Repair of Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection

Purpose:

To evaluate the outcome of stent-graft placement in Stanford type B aortic dissection using contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomographic (CT) measurements of true and false lumen volumes and thrombus length.

Methods:

Among 18 consecutive patients (13 men; mean age 60 years, range 44–79) who underwent endovascular repair of Stanford type B dissection, 12 completed at least a 12-month follow-up, which included CT measurements of true and false lumen volumes and thrombus lengths prior to discharge and at 6 and 12 months postimplantation. Volumes were assessed in 3 different aortic segments (A1, A2, A3) extending from the proximal attachment site of the prosthesis to the aortic bifurcation. In addition, thrombus length was measured to evaluate the influence of clot formation on outcome of the false lumen volume.

Results:

Mean follow-up was 27 months (range 12–60). Within 12 months, mean true lumen volumes showed statistically significant increases in the A1 (p<0.001) and A2 (p=0.003) segments; false lumen volumes showed a significant decrease in the A1 segment (p=0.002) but an insignificant increase in the A2 segment. No substantial volume changes were observed in the A3 segment. Extension of clot formation in the false lumen varied among patients and over time. Length of stent-grafts, percentage of stented dissection length, or visceral arteries originating from the false lumen did not significantly influence thrombus development, nor did these parameters or thrombus formation distal to the prosthesis have a relationship to false lumen volumes.

Conclusions:

Volumetric analysis after endovascular repair of Stanford type B dissection shows optimal technical outcome in the stented segment, whereas the false lumen in the segment immediately adjacent to the stent-graft seems to be a vulnerable area. Extension of clot formation beyond the endograft seems to be no reliable predictor of outcome.

Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data

OBJECTIVES

The behavior of the aneurysm sac after endovascular grafting has been the subject of significant speculation. The importance of sac behavior is manifested by the correlation between aneurysm size or size change and risk for rupture, and potentially further extrapolated to define the need for secondary intervention. This study was undertaken to define graft-specific differences and the effect of endoleak on sac remodeling.

METHODS

Core laboratory data were obtained for three US Phase II clinical trials. Patients were included if they met anatomic inclusion criteria and underwent placement of the latest version of a bifurcated endovascular prosthesis. Unsupported Dacron (Ancure), supported Dacron (Zenith), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Excluder) grafts were evaluated. Digitized images were electronically assessed for aneurysm size (area, maximum, minimum diameter) with National Institutes of Health Image software. Two blinded reviewers analyzed each radiographic study to ensure accurate image selection and establish the presence or absence of endoleak. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. chi(2) analysis and mixed nonlinear modeling were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Of 1506 patients evaluated, 723 (227 Ancure, 343 Excluder, 153 Zenith) met inclusion criteria for the study. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months (Ancure, 31.3 months; Excluder, 19.6 months; Zenith, 19.3 months). The incidence of any endoleak was 39.1% (Ancure, 58.1%; Excluder, 34.7%; Zenith, 20.9%; P <.001). Type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size were determinants of rate of aneurysm shrinkage. Reduction in sac size was greatest with the Zenith graft, followed by the Ancure and Excluder grafts. Presence of endoleak had a moderating effect on rate of sac shrinkage with the Zenith and Ancure grafts; however, sac size increased in the presence of endoleak with the Excluder graft. Finally, baseline size was positively correlated with rate of aneurysm shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

The behavior of the aneurysm sac depends on the type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size of the sac. Differential sac behavior must be considered when determining the need for secondary interventions, timing follow-up studies, and assessing success or failure of endovascular repair.

Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating the success of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is frequently based on diameter measurements and determining the presence of endoleaks. The use of three-dimensional volumetric data and observation of morphologic changes in the aneurysm and device have been proposed to be more appropriate for postdeployment surveillance. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term volumetric and morphologic data of 161 patients who underwent endovascular AAA exclusion and to assess the utility of volume measurements for determining successful AAA repair.

METHODS

Patients with spiral computed tomography scans obtained preoperatively, within the first postoperative month, at 6 months, and annually thereafter, were included in this analysis. Computerized interactive three-dimensional reconstruction of each AAA scan was performed. Total aneurysm sac volume was measured at each time interval (mean preoperative volume 169.0 +/- 78.5 mL), and the significance of volume changes was determined by mixed linear modeling, a form of repeated measures analysis, to account for longitudinal data clustered at the individual level. Sixty-two patients (38%) developed endoleaks at some time during follow-up-15 type I leaks, 45 type II leaks, and 2 type III leaks. The patients with type I and type III leaks were treated with cuffs, and the type II leaks were treated either with observation, side-branch embolization, or required open conversion.

RESULTS

Aneurysm sac volume increased slightly at 1-month follow-up (+3.3%), and then decreased steadily to -12.9% at 5 years (P <.0001). This effect remained unchanged after controlling for the three device types used in our study population. Patients who did not exhibit an endoleak (n = 99) showed a significant decrease in aneurysm volume across the entire follow-up duration when compared with those who did exhibit an endoleak (n = 62) (P <.0001). The presence of a 10% or greater decrease in volume at 6 months demonstrated a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 95%, a negative predictive value of 62%, and an accuracy of 75% for predicting primary clinical success defined by successful deployment of the device; freedom from aneurysm- or procedure-related death; freedom from endoleak, rupture, migration, or device malfunction; or conversion to open repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric analysis may be used to predict successful endoluminal exclusion of AAAs. Volume regression appears to be device-independent and should be expected in most clinically successful cases. The presence of volume increases in the first 6 months is suspicious for an endoleak that is pressurizing the aneurysm sac and heralds the need for closer evaluation and possible intervention. A volume decrease of 10% or greater at 6 months and continuing regression over time is associated with successful endovascular repair.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm size regression after endovascular repair is endograft dependent

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to determine whether abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) regression is different with various endografts after endovascular repair.

METHODS

A four-center retrospective review of size change after endovascular AAA repair was performed. Consecutive patients with at least 1-year follow-up and available imaging studies were included. Three hundred ninety patients received either the Ancure, AneuRx, Excluder, or Talent endograft. AAA size and endoleak status were recorded from computed tomography (CT) scans at the initial postoperative follow-up visit and at 1 and 2 years thereafter. AAA size was defined as the minor axis of the infrarenal aorta on the largest axial section on the two-dimensional CT scan. A change in AAA size of 0.5 cm or greater from baseline was considered clinically significant. The effect of initial size, endoleak, and type of endograft on AAA regression was analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean baseline size was significantly greater with Talent endografts and smaller with Excluder endografts. Clinically significant regression in AAA size occurred in nearly three fourths of patients with Ancure and Talent endografts at 2 years. Regression in AAA size was less frequent with the AneuRx (46%) and Excluder (44%) devices. Initial size, endoleak, and endograft type were significant predictors of regression at multivariate analysis at 1 year. However, by 2 years only endograft type was still an independent predictor of AAA shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term morphologic changes after endovascular aneurysm repair depend on endograft type.

Endovascular AAA repair: classification of aneurysm sac volumetric change using spiral computed tomographic angiography

PURPOSE

To classify and analyze the volumetric changes seen on spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

Fifty patients (46 men; mean age 71 years, range 51-83) with >1 year of imaging follow-up were retrospectively selected. The volume of the aneurysm sac was calculated on standard CT workstations to obtain plots of volume changes over time. For the purpose of this study, a 10% change in sac volume was considered significant.

RESULTS

Over a mean 32-month follow-up, 256 CTA scans were performed; initial mean sac volume was 259 mL and initial mean AAA diameter was 6.5 cm. Six distinct patterns of volume change were recognized: group Ia (28 patients, 56%): progressive reduction in aneurysm sac volume; group Ib (3 patients, 6%): transient initial increase then same as Ia; group II (4 patients, 8%): no significant change; group IIIa (5 patients, 10%): late increase in volume; group IIIb (8 patients, 16%): progressive increase in volume; and group IV (2 patients, 4%): late reduction in volume after secondary intervention. Group III changes were associated with endoleak types I and III (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This classification system of spiral CTA volumetric changes features 6 patterns with recognized clinical significance and predictive value for endoleaks. Group I is the ideal outcome when the aneurysm sac shrinks and often completely disappears, while group III is associated with types I and type III endoleak and should prompt further investigation. Long-term volumetric analysis of all patients is advised.

Micromovements at the aortic aneurysm neck measured during open surgery with close-range photogrammetry: implications for aortic endografts

PURPOSE

To describe the motion of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as a first step toward determining if stent-graft migration may be due to propulsive movements at the neck.

METHOD

In an initial laboratory validation test, a silicone AAA model was imaged with a stereo-pair configuration of calibrated digital cameras using retro-reflective and ink dot surface targets. This technique was then applied to 4 aneurysm necks imaged at open surgery. In each case the paired images were measured and analyzed to produce sequences of accurate three-dimensional (3-D) surface models of the anterior aspect of the aortic neck. Engineering techniques were used to visualize and identify differences between the generated surfaces, allowing changes in shape of the aortic wall to be determined.

RESULTS

The correlation between stereoscopic digital imaging with electronic caliper measurements of linear dimensions was accurate, irrespective of the type of surface targets used (r2 = 0.98). The AAA neck demonstrated complex 3-D movements that ranged from 1.0 to 1.5 mm in the radial direction to 0.6 to 1.0 mm along the longitudinal axis, with a 0.44 to 0.59-mm rotational component (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study raises questions about the validity of accepted models of arterial wall movements and compliance in which rotation has not been described. The technique used to measure dynamic neck morphology appears promising as a means to further define the mechanical parameters of the human aorta, which may assist in designing stent-grafts.

Risk stratification and outcomes of transluminal endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 7-year experience and long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

To determine early and late outcomes of transluminal endografting (TE) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), stratified by predicted risk of procedure-related mortality with conventional operation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in consecutive risk-stratified AAA patients undergoing TE at a not-for-profit cardiovascular referral center from March 1994 through November 2000 with follow-up through February 2001. With use of conventional risk strata (0 = low, 1 = minimal, 2 = moderate, and 3 = high), predicted procedure-related mortalities were 0%-1% in stratum 0 (n = 40), 1%-3% in stratum 1 (n = 118), 3%-8% in stratum 2 (n = 116), and 8%-30% in stratum 3 (n = 31). Main outcome measures were: (i) TE procedural success, (ii) procedure-related mortality, (iii) major nonfatal complications, (iv) composite adverse outcome (ii + iii), (v) length of stay (LOS), (vi) freedom from AAA rupture, (vii) late survival, (viii) late complications, and (ix) endoleaks and their classification and management.

RESULTS

Women were significantly less likely than men to qualify for and undergo endografting: 24 of 91 (26.4%) women underwent TE, compared to 281 of 684 (41.1%) men. Of 305 attempted TE procedures, 291 (95.4%) were successful, four (1.3%) were urgently converted to open repair, and 10 (3.3%) were aborted. Procedure-related mortalities occurred in eight cases (2.6%) overall and one of 40 (2.5%), one of 118 (0.8%), four of 116 (3.4%), and two of 31 (6.5%) cases for risk strata 0-3, respectively. Perioperative survivors were significantly younger than nonsurvivors (74.3 y +/- 9 vs 81.6 y +/- 5.1; P =.0087). Forty-six patients (15.1%) had major complications. Composite adverse outcome was worse for patients in stratum 3 than those in stratum 1 (P =.0296) and those in strata 0, 1, and 2 combined (P =.026). Procedure-related mortality declined with institutional experience, from 4% among the first 100 patients undergoing TE to 1% among the last 105. For strata 0-3, median LOS were 2, 3, 3, and 4 days, respectively. Seventy patients (22.9%) had 75 endoleaks, of which 30 necessitated additional procedures, 17 self-resolved, and 22 were untreated as of March 1, 2001. Five patients with endoleak died of unrelated causes. One late-onset type IA endoleak (26 mo) resulted in the only AAA rupture and death in the follow-up period among the 291 patients who underwent successful transluminal endograft implantation. Actuarial survival rates at 1 year after TE were 90.3% +/- 1.9% for the overall study group and 97.5% +/- 2.5%, 94% +/- 2.5%, 86.9% +/- 3.3%, and 81.3% +/- 7.7% for risk strata 0-3, respectively. At 5 years, overall actuarial survival was 69.6% +/- 6.1%. Thirty-eight late deaths were attributable to post-TE AAA rupture (n = 1), AAA rupture late after failed TE with no further treatment (n = 1), other cardiovascular disorders (n = 7), cancer (n = 15), other causes (n = 10), and unknown causes (n = 4). Late deaths occurred in risk strata 0-3 at the following rates: two of 40 (5%), 10 of 118 (8.5%), 16 of 116 (13.8%), and 10 of 31 (32.3%), respectively (stratum 0 vs stratum 3, P =.0017; stratum 1 vs stratum 3, P =.003).

CONCLUSIONS

TE is safe and confers durable protection against AAA rupture in treated populations. Still, protection is not absolute in patients with endoleaks, because late AAA enlargement and even rupture can occur. Given current knowledge, technology, and practice, careful patient selection and close surveillance of patients after implantation of transluminal endografts is essential.

Serial CT volume measurements after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of transluminal stent-graft placement in aortic aneurysms using postoperative enhanced spiral computed tomographic (CT) volumetric measurements of the aneurysm sac, the intra-aneurysmal vascular channel (IAVC), the thrombus, and the stent-graft.

METHODS

Among 53 patients (45 men; mean age 74 years, range 59-85) who underwent elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, 37 patients with 27 abdominal and 10 thoracic aortic aneurysms completed at least a 6-month follow-up that included computerized CT volumetric analysis prior to discharge and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. A variety of bifurcated (n = 23) and tube (n = 14) stent-grafts were observed for signs of endoleak and aneurysm enlargement.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 16 months (range 6-48). Total aneurysm volumes and thrombus volumes decreased, whereas IAVC and stent-graft volumes increased over time. Between the postoperative and 12-month imaging studies, reductions in total aneurysm (p 0.011) and thrombus (p < 0.001) volumes were significant. No statistically significant difference in volume changes for the aneurysm sac (p = 0.555) or the thrombus (p = 0.920) was found when comparing the 24 patients without primary leak to the 12 with primary type-II leak. In all 5 cases with secondary leak, the volume of the aneurysm sac increased after initial shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative CT volumetric analysis is an effective tool for evaluating the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Thrombus volume measurements are more accurate than total aneurysm volumes. In patients in whom contrast agents are contraindicated, volume measurements can also be obtained without the use of contrast.