Cyclin E immunoexpression in breast ductal carcinoma: pathologic correlations and prognostic implications

Oncogenic and Tumor Suppressive Components of the Cell Cycle in Breast Cancer Progression and Prognosis

Cancer, a disease of inappropriate cell proliferation, is strongly interconnected with the cell cycle. All cancers consist of an abnormal accumulation of neoplastic cells, which are propagated toward uncontrolled cell division and proliferation in response to mitogenic signals. Mitogenic stimuli include genetic and epigenetic changes in cell cycle regulatory genes and other genes which regulate the cell cycle. This suggests that multiple, distinct pathways of genetic alterations lead to cancer development. Products of both oncogenes (including cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKs) and cyclins) and tumor suppressor genes (including cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors) regulate cell cycle machinery and promote or suppress cell cycle progression, respectively. The identification of cyclins and CDKs help to explain and understand the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle machinery. During breast cancer tumorigenesis, cyclins A, B, C, D1, and E; cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKs); and CDK-inhibitor proteins p16, p21, p27, and p53 are known to play significant roles in cell cycle control and are tightly regulated in normal breast epithelial cells. Following mitogenic stimuli, these components are deregulated, which promotes neoplastic transformation of breast epithelial cells. Multiple studies implicate the roles of both types of components-oncogenic CDKs and cyclins, along with tumor-suppressing cyclin-dependent inhibitors-in breast cancer initiation and progression. Numerous clinical studies have confirmed that there is a prognostic significance for screening for these described components, regarding patient outcomes and their responses to therapy. The aim of this review article is to summarize the roles of oncogenic and tumor-suppressive components of the cell cycle in breast cancer progression and prognosis.

Steroid Hormone Receptors: Links With Cell Cycle Machinery and Breast Cancer Progression

Progression of cells through cell cycle consists of a series of events orchestrated in a regulated fashion. Such processes are influenced by cell cycle regulated expression of various proteins where multiple families of transcription factors take integral parts. Among these, the steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) represent a connection between the external hormone milieu and genes that control cellular proliferation. Therefore, understanding the molecular connection between the transcriptional role of steroid hormone receptors and cell cycle deserves importance in dissecting cellular proliferation in normal as well as malignant conditions. Deregulation of cell cycle promotes malignancies of various origins, including breast cancer. Indeed, SHR members play crucial role in breast cancer progression as well as management. This review focuses on SHR-driven cell cycle regulation and moving forward, attempts to discuss the role of SHR-driven crosstalk between cell cycle anomalies and breast cancer.

Cytoplasmic Cyclin E Is an Independent Marker of Aggressive Tumor Biology and Breast Cancer-Specific Mortality in Women over 70 Years of Age

Multi-cohort analysis demonstrated that cytoplasmic cyclin E expression in primary breast tumors predicts aggressive disease. However, compared to their younger counterparts, older patients have favorable tumor biology and are less likely to die of breast cancer. Biomarkers therefore require interpretation in this specific context. Here, we assess data on cytoplasmic cyclin E from a UK cohort of older women alongside a panel of >20 biomarkers. Between 1973 and 2010, 813 women ≥70 years of age underwent initial surgery for early breast cancer, from which a tissue microarray was constructed (n = 517). Biomarker expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Multivariate analysis of breast cancer-specific survival was performed using Cox's proportional hazards. We found that cytoplasmic cyclin E was the only biological factor independently predictive of breast cancer-specific survival in this cohort of older women (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93-20.14; p = 0.002). At ten years, 42% of older patients with cytoplasmic cyclin E-positive tumors had died of breast cancer versus 8% of negative cases (p < 0.0005). We conclude that cytoplasmic cyclin E is an exquisite marker of aggressive tumor biology in older women. Patients with cytoplasmic cyclin E-negative tumors are unlikely to die of breast cancer. These data have the potential to influence treatment strategy in older patients.

Cell Cycle Regulation in Treatment of Breast Cancer

Cell cycle progression and cell proliferation are under precise and orchestrated control in normal cells. However, uncontrolled cell proliferation caused by aberrant cell cycle progression is a crucial characteristic of cancer. Understanding cell cycle progression and its regulation sheds light on cancer treatment. Agents targeting cell cycle regulators (such as CDKs) have been considered as promising candidates in cancer treatment. Although the first-generation pan-CDK inhibitors failed in clinical trials because of their adverse events and low efficacy, new selective CDK 4/6 inhibitors showed potent efficacy with tolerable safety in preclinical and clinical studies. Here we will review the mechanisms of cell cycle regulation and targeting key cell cycle regulators (such as CDKs) in breast cancer treatment. Particularly, we will discuss the mechanism of CDK inhibitors in disrupting cell cycle progression, the use of selective CDK4/6 inhibitors in treatment of advanced, hormone receptor (HR)-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients, and other clinical trials that aim to extend the utilization of these agents.

Cytoplasmic Cyclin E and Phospho-Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Are Biomarkers of Aggressive Breast Cancer

Cyclin E and its co-activator, phospho-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (p-CDK2), regulate G1 to S phase transition and their deregulation induces oncogenesis. Immunohistochemical assessments of these proteins in cancer have been reported but were based only on their nuclear expression. However, the oncogenic forms of cyclin E (low molecular weight cyclin E or LMW-E) in complex with CDK2 are preferentially mislocalized to the cytoplasm. Here, we used separate nuclear and cytoplasmic scoring systems for both cyclin E and p-CDK2 expression to demonstrate altered cellular accumulation of these proteins using immunohistochemical analysis. We examined the specificity of different cyclin E antibodies and evaluated their concordance between immunohistochemical and Western blot analyses in a panel of 14 breast cell lines. Nuclear versus cytoplasmic staining of cyclin E readily differentiated full-length from LMW-E, respectively. We also evaluated the expression of cyclin E and p-CDK2 in 1676 breast carcinoma patients by immunohistochemistry. Cytoplasmic cyclin E correlated strongly with cytoplasmic p-CDK2 (P < 0.0001), high tumor grade, negative estrogen/progesterone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity (all P < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, cytoplasmic cyclin E plus phosphorylated CDK2 (as one variable) predicted breast cancer recurrence-free and overall survival. These results suggest that cytoplasmic cyclin E and p-CDK2 can be readily detected with immunohistochemistry and used as clinical biomarkers for aggressive breast cancer.

Cyclin E amplification, over-expression, and relapse-free survival in HER-2-positive primary breast cancer

Cyclin E is a well-characterized cell cycle regulator and an amplified oncogene in breast cancer. Over-expression of cyclin E has generally been associated with poor survival. Recent studies have shown an interaction between HER-2 (ERBB2) and cyclin E, but the exact mechanism is unknown. Interestingly, cyclin E over-expression has been associated with trastuzumab resistance. We studied cyclin E over-expression, CCNE1 amplification, and relapse-free survival in HER-2-positive primary breast cancers treated with and without trastuzumab therapy. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 202 HER-2-positive breast carcinomas were studied. Expression levels of cyclin E and proliferation marker Ki-67 were determined using immunohistochemistry. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) with a gene-specific bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) probe was used to analyze presence of CCNE1 amplification. Majority of HER-2-positive breast carcinomas exhibited nuclear staining for cyclin E protein. Cyclin E was highly expressed (≥50 % cells) in 37 % of cases. Incidence of CCNE1 amplification (≥6 gene copies/cell or clusters) was 8 %. Cyclin E amplification and over-expression were strongly associated with each other, grade, hormone receptors, and Ki-67. Neither high cyclin E expression nor CCNE1 amplification was associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) irrespective of short-term (9-week regimen) adjuvant trastuzumab therapy. These results confirm cyclin E and HER-2 gene co-amplification in a fraction of HER-2-positive breast cancers. Cyclin E is frequently over-expressed but appears to have limited value as a prognostic or predictive factor in HER-2-positive breast cancer regardless of trastuzumab therapy.

Expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E in urothelial bladder carcinoma detected in tissue chips using a quantum dot immunofluorescence technique

The present study aimed to investigate the expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E in tissue chips of bladder cancer using quantum dots (QDs), as well as examine its clinicopathological significance. The QD-based immunofluorescence tissue chemical technique was adopted to detect cyclin D1 and cyclin E expression in 75 tissue chips of human urothelial bladder carcinoma (including 70 cases of urothelial bladder carcinoma and 5 cases of cystitis), and its correlation with clinicopathological features was analyzed. The positive rates of cyclin D1 and cyclin E expression in urothelial bladder carcinoma were 68.6% (48/70) and 70.0% (49/70), respectively; however, no expression was observed in cystitis. Based on the results of statistical analysis, the difference in the positive rates of cyclin D1 and cyclin E expression between urothelial bladder carcinoma and cystitis was significant (P<0.05). QD staining and statistical analysis revealed that the expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E in urothelial bladder carcinoma was significantly higher compared with that in cystitis (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in cyclin D1 expression was observed in relation to pathological stage, clinical stage or invasion of urothelial bladder carcinoma; however, there was a significant difference (P<0.05) in cyclin E expression with respect to these factors. These results demonstrated that overexpression of cyclin D1 may be an early event in the occurrence of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Cyclin D1 may play a role in the initial stage where cell proliferation is a necessary step, without invasion or metastasis. In addition, overexpression of cyclin E was correlated with the stage and depth of invasion of urothelial bladder carcinoma. In conclusion, the abnormal expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E may be involved in the occurrence and development of urothelial bladder carcinoma.

Expression of cyclin A, cyclin E and p27 in normal, hyperplastic and frankly malignant endometrial samples

Cellular growth is under the control of certain molecules such as cyclins and cyclin dependent kinases. Dysregulation of these proteins disrupt cell cycle and may trigger malignant transformation. Cyclins and kinase inhibitors also play essential roles in endometrial cellular proliferation. But the exact roles of these mediators in the disease process is not clear. We evaluated expression of cyclin A, cyclin E and p27 in normal, hyperplastic and malignant endometrial samples assuming different expression patterns in physiological and pathological processes. A total of 75 patients with histopathological diagnosis of normal proliferative, hyperplastic or malignant endometrial samples were evaluated with different cellular proliferation markers, cyclin A, cyclin E and p27. For cyclin E, endometrial cancer samples had higher rate of immunoreactivity than normal proliferative and hyperplastic endometrial samples. Staining properties for cyclin A were comparable for three groups. However, p27 immunoreactivity decreased progressively as lesions progress from proliferative benign endometrium to frank carcinoma. Further large-scale studies with clinical follow-up will reveal the exact role of cyclins on endometrial carcinogenesis.

Disparities in breast cancer outcomes between Caucasian and African American women: a model for describing the relationship of biological and nonbiological factors

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the United States but significant disparities exist for African American women compared to Caucasian women. African American women present with breast cancer at a younger age and with a greater incidence under the age of 50 years, develop histologically more aggressive tumors that are at a more advanced stage at presentation, and have a worse disease-free and overall survival than Caucasian women. The biological characteristics of the primary tumor play an important role in determining the outcome of the disparity, and significant differences have been identified between African American and Caucasian breast cancer in steroid receptor and growth factor receptor content, mutations in cell cycle components, chromosomal abnormalities, and tumor suppressor and other cancer genes. The consequences of the biological factors are influenced by a variety of nonbiological factors, including socioeconomic, health care access, reproductive, and confounding factors. The nonbiological factors may act directly to enhance (or inhibit) the consequences of the biological changes, indirectly to facilitate outcome of the disparity, or as a cofounding factor, driving the association between the biological factors and the disparity. The prevention and management of the disparities will require an understanding of the relationship of biological and nonbiological factors. The present review was undertaken to promote this understanding by describing the biological basis of the four major disparities - early age of onset, more advanced stage of disease, more aggressive histologic changes, and worse survival - and the important relationship to the nonbiological factors. A model is proposed to provide a comprehensive view of this relationship, with the goal of facilitating an understanding of each disparity and the issues that need to be addressed to eliminate the disparity.

Prognostic value of cyclin E expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Cyclin E is an important regulator of cell cycle progression. Various studies examined the relationship between cyclin E overexpression with the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer but yielded conflicting results. Electronic databases updated to May 2013 were searched to find relevant studies. A meta-analysis was conducted with eligible studies which quantitatively evaluated the relationship between cyclin E overexpression and survival of patients with breast cancer. Survival data were aggregated and quantitatively analyzed. We conducted a final analysis of 7,759 patients from 23 eligible studies and evaluated the correlation between cyclin E overexpression and survival in patients with breast cancer. Combined hazard ratios suggested that cyclin E overexpression had an unfavorable impact on overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-1.49) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR = 1.48, 95% CI, 1.03-1.93), but not disease-free survival (HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.27) in patients with breast cancer. Significantly, risks were found among stage I-II breast cancer for (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.30-2.19). Cyclin E overexpression is associated with poor OS and BCSS in breast cancer.

Cyclin E low-molecular-weight isoform as a predictor of breast cancer in Japanese women

Overexpression of low-molecular-weight isoforms (LMWI) of cyclin E in breast cancer cells is associated with poor prognosis and could serve a novel role in breast cancer progression. LMWI originate from proteolytic processing of cyclin E, which is deregulated and hyperactive. In this study, levels of full-form/LMWI cyclin E were determined with the use of Western blot analysis in 69 Japanese breast cancer patients. LMWI cyclin E levels were significantly correlated with known parameters such as tumor grade and estrogen/progesterone receptor expression. In multivariate analysis, patient survival was significantly correlated with tumor grade but not with either form of cyclin E. LMWI was not as strong a predictor as tumor grade in this study, whereas some cases of early relapse with LMWI overexpression and lower tumor grade were reported. Thus, LMWI might be a good complementary factor to other predictors for early relapse of breast cancer.

A study to investigate the role of p27 and cyclin E immunoexpression as a prognostic factor in early breast carcinoma

Background

Cyclin E and p27 expression is easy to assess in human tissues by standard immunohistochemical techniques. Immunohistochemistry is cost effective, relatively easy to perform and will play more of a role in the future management of cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of p27 and cyclin E immunoexpression as a prognostic factor in early breast carcinoma.

Methods

Cyclin E and p27 immunohistochemistry was performed on sixty six cases of breast carcinoma submitted over a five year period to the Division of Anatomical Pathology, Groote Schuur hospital; Whittaker and Associates; and PathCare. All tumours included in this study were less than 5 cm in diameter (pT1 and pT2 stage) and all the patients had wide local excisions performed. Follow up information was obtained from patient folders in the Department of Radiation Oncology.

Results

There was no significant association of cyclin E and p27 expression with distant metastasis free survival (MFS) for all invasive carcinomas in contrast to grade, lymph node spread and vascular invasion. However, there was a statistically significant direct association of cyclin E with distant metastases in all invasive carcinomas, in the subgroup of infiltrating duct carcinomas (IDC) and in the node negative group when cyclin E was stratified as negative and positive (low/high). In this study of early breast carcinoma, only 9/66 cases showed cyclin E expression. Of these, four patients had distant metastases, one patient had a local recurrence and four patients were alive at last follow-up. Furthermore, cyclin E expression was significantly associated with grade, lymph node spread, oestrogen receptor status and histological type. None of the lobular carcinomas showed cyclin E positivity and only one case of lobular carcinoma presented with distant metastases.

59/66 cases were positive (low/high) for p27 while seven cases were negative, 22 cases showed low expression and 37 cases demonstrated high p27 expression.

p27 was significantly associated with oestrogen receptor status only for all invasive carcinomas and in the IDC group. There was no statistical relationship between p27 and cyclin E, but 50 (76%) tumours with positive p27 expression were negative for cyclin E. There were similar results for the invasive ductal carcinoma subgroup.

Conclusion

This study shows that p27 and cyclin E are not good independent prognostic markers for early breast carcinoma in contrast to grade, lymph node spread and vascular invasion for all invasive carcinomas. However, cyclin E provides some prognostic value as there is a direct statistical association with the development of distant metastases. Many previous studies have correlated overexpression of cyclin E with an aggressive course. The inverse relationship between p27 and cyclin E expression which has been reported in the literature has been highlighted, but this was not statistically significant. Most cases showed positive p27 expression and negative Cyclin E expression. This may be due to the early stage of the disease.

Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance

The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14^ARF, TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits.

Cyclin E Expression and Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies

In vitro studies showed that cyclin E can accelerate the cell cycle by shorten the G1/S phase transition. Therefore, varieties of studies have investigated the relationship between cyclin E and survival in breast cancer patients. However, the results differed widely between studies. We reviewed the published studies and performed a meta-analysis, which including 12 independent studies and 2,534 patients. The combined HR estimate for relapse-free survival (RFS) was 2.32 (95% CI, 1.25-4.30) and 1.72 (95% CI, 0.95-3.10) in univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. In addition, the combined HR estimate for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) was 2.98 (95% CI, 1.85-4.78) and 2.86 (95% CI, 1.85-4.41) in univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. In conclusion, the high level of cyclin E appears to be an independent prognostic factor to OS/BCSS of breast cancer patients but not to RFS.

Cyclin E deregulation is an early event in the development of breast cancer

Cyclin E has been shown to be overexpressed in some human breast cancers, however, data to support deregulation of cyclin E as an early event in human mammary tumor development is lacking. We analyzed surgical specimens from 183 patients with breast carcinomas and evaluated cyclin E expression in areas of invasive carcinoma, adjacent carcinoma in situ (CIS), and non-neoplastic breast parenchyma. Overexpression of cyclin E was seen in one-third of invasive carcinoma samples, one-third of the CIS component and nearly half of the non-neoplastic breast epithelial cells adjacent to carcinoma (44% vs. 33%, P < or = 0.05). Nuclear labeling for cyclin E was highly concordant between areas of in invasive carcinoma, CIS and non-neoplastic breast epithelial cells from the same patient (P < 0.0001). Localization of cyclin E to the cytoplasm was seen in a small proportion of tumor samples. Our findings suggest that cyclin E deregulation is an early event in the progression from histologically benign mammary epithelial cells to invasive carcinoma and occurs through both overexpression and altered cellular localization.

Protein Expression Profiling in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Treated with High-Dose or Conventional Dose–Dense Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To characterize the prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression profiles in high-risk breast cancer patients who had previously been shown to benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in comparison to dose-dense chemotherapy (DDCT).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The expression of 34 protein markers was evaluated using tissue microarrays containing paraffin-embedded breast cancer samples from 236 patients who were randomized to the West German Study Group AM01 trial.

RESULTS

(a) 24 protein markers of the initial panel of 34 markers were sufficient to identify five profile clusters (subtypes) by K-means clustering: luminal-A (27%), luminal-B (12%), HER-2 (21%), basal-like (13%) cluster, and a so-called "multiple marker negative" (MMN) cluster (27%) characterized by the absence of specifying markers. (b) After DDCT, HER-2 and basal-like groups had significantly worse event-free survival [EFS; hazard ratio (HR), 3.6 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.65-8.18; P = 0.001] and HR, 3.7 (95% CI, 1.68-8.48; P < 0.0001), respectively] when compared with both luminal groups. (c) After HDCT, the HR was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.76-3.05) for EFS in the HER-2 subgroup and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.37-3.32) in the basal-like subgroup, which indicates a better outcome for patients in the HER-2 and basal-like subgroups who received HDCT. The MMN cluster showed a trend to a better EFS after HDCT compared with DDCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Protein expression profiling in high-risk breast cancers identified five subtypes, which differed with respect to survival and response to chemotherapy: In contrast to luminal-A and luminal-B subtypes, HER-2 and basal-like subgroups had a significant predictive benefit, and the MMN cluster had a trend to a predictive benefit, both from HDCT when compared with DDCT.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 expression in human melanomas and benign melanocytic skin lesions

Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2) is strongly involved in regulating the progression of the cell cycle through G1/S checkpoint and S phase. Numerous studies demonstrated increased levels of CDK-2 (and also of its regulatory cyclins E and/or A) in different types of human tumours. Correlations found between the expression of those cell cycle regulators and progression and/or invasiveness of some tumours indicated the importance of CDK-2 as a potential prognostic marker. At the same time, in vitro studies of melanoma cell lines revealed melanocyte-specific regulation of CDK-2. The present study was aimed at examining levels of CDK-2 in human melanomas and benign pigmented lesions to evaluate whether it might be considered a potential molecular marker of melanoma progression. Expression of CDK-2 was determined immunohistochemically in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens comprising 76 lesions including 41 primary cutaneous melanomas, 15 lymph node melanoma metastases (in eight cases correlated with primary tumours), three melanoma recurrences (two cases correlated with both primary and metastatic melanomas) and 17 nevi. Our results demonstrate that development and progression of melanoma are associated with changes in CDK-2 expression level. Statistical significance of the observed correlations indicates that CDK-2 may be a suitable prognostic marker for melanoma and perhaps also a target for chemotherapeutic drugs.

Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now?

In the last few decades, proliferative markers have been broadly evaluated as prognostic and predictive factors for early stage breast cancer patients. Several papers evaluating one or more markers have been published, often with contradictory results. As a consequence, there is still uncertainty about the role of these proliferative markers. The present paper critically reviews the current knowledge about the following markers: thymidine labeling index, S phase fraction/flow cytometry, Ki 67, thymidine kinase (TK), cyclins E, cyclin D, the cyclin inhibitors p27 and p21, and topoisomerase IIalpha. For each marker, the prognostic and predictive role was separately analyzed. Only papers published in English in peer-reviewed journals before June 2004 that include at least 100 evaluable patients were selected. In addition, the prognostic and predictive role of the proliferative markers had to be assessed through multivariate analyses. One hundred and thirty-two papers fulfilled these criteria and 159 516 patients were analyzed. Unfortunately, several methodological problems in the research to date prevent us from including any one of these proliferative markers among the standard prognostic and predictive factors. Early incorporation of translational research and new technologies with clinical trials are needed to prospectively validate biological markers and allow their use in clinical practice.

Combined evaluation of expressions of cyclin E and p53 proteins as prognostic factors for patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consistency regarding the prognostic value of cyclin E overexpression in gastric cancer (gastric cancer). Our aim was to report on this overexpression and to analyze its correlations with the clinicopathologic variables. Another aim was to examine if aberrant expression of both cyclin E and p53 might increase the malignant potential of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Specimens from 89 patients with gastric cancer treated with "curative" intent were evaluated for cyclin E and p53 expressions using immunohistochemical method. The correlations between cyclin E overexpression alone or in combination with p53 expression and the patient's clinicopathologic variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Cyclin E overexpression and p53 expression were shown in 35 (39.3%) and 46 (51.7%) tumors, respectively. The incidence of cyclin E overexpression was significantly higher in deeply invasive cancers (P < 0.0001), in cancers with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.003), and in cancers with advanced stages (P < 0.0001). There were no significant correlations with other clinicopathologic variables. Patients in whom their tumors showed cyclin E overexpression alone or in combination with p53 survived less than patients with negative cyclin E tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that combined cyclin E overexpression and p53 expression was significantly associated with poor survival after adjusting for other variables (hazard ratio, 3.12; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin E overexpression is a common event in gastric cancer. Gastric cancer with cyclin E overexpression exhibit increased aggressiveness in the presence of aberrant p53. The combination of cyclin E overexpression with the p53 expression in gastric cancer further distinguished a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis.

Are all high-grade breast cancers with no steroid receptor hormone expression alike? The special case of the medullary phenotype

BACKGROUND

Medullary carcinoma (MC) of the breast is associated with favorable prognosis compared with other histological types, despite high nuclear grade, fast proliferation and lack of steroid hormone receptor expression. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical relevance of selected immunohistochemical features of tumors in three cohorts of patients with typical medullary (MC), 'atypical' medullary (AMC) or ductal (DC) breast carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Evaluation was performed on node-negative tumor specimens from 40 patients who had either MC (12 patients), AMC (nine patients) or DC (19 patients), treated in a single institution. All had no hormonal receptor, Ki-67 > or =30%, G3, expansive pattern of growth and peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration. In addition, p27, p21 and HER2/neu overexpression, p53, cyclin E and E-cadherin expression, presence of apoptotic cells, stromal tenascin (TN), and type of immune cell infiltration (CD3- and CD68-positive cells) were assessed.

RESULTS

No difference in expression of HER2/neu, p21, p27, p53, number of apoptotic cells and CD68-positive cells was detected. Lower levels of stromal TN expression were found in MC compared with DC (P=0.0007), but differences between MC and AMC were not significant (P=0.27). A higher proportion of intratumoral CD3-positive cells was seen in MC than in AMC (P=0.046). No differences were seen between MC and DC (P=0.73). With a median follow-up of 67 months, three patients with DC had relapsed in distant sites, while one patient with AMC had a second primary. Two patients with MC had reappearance of DC in the breast.

CONCLUSIONS

The three distinct disease types, selected by having similar high proliferation, had similar expression of cell cycle regulators. The lower expression of TN and massive infiltration of T lymphocytes might both indicate a special interaction between tumor cells and microenvironment, important features for conferring improved prognosis through negligible invasive and metastatic potential to MC. In our series, however, patients with a previous MC are not free from the risk of developing a subsequent DC. Finally, defining AMC as a distinct entity from DC is not justified.

Cyclin E in normal and neoplastic cell cycles

Cyclin E-Cdk2 has long been considered an essential and master regulator of progression through G1 phase of the cell cycle. Although recent mouse models have prompted a rethinking of cyclin E function in mammals, it remains clear that cyclin E impacts upon many processes central to cell division. Normal cells maintain strict control of cyclin E activity, and this is commonly disrupted in cancer cells. Moreover, cyclin E deregulation is thought to play a fundamental role in tumorigenesis. In this review, we discuss the regulation and functions of cyclin E in normal and neoplastic mammalian cells.

Bringing Molecular Prognosis and Prediction to the Clinic

In the past 30 years, important advances have been made in the knowledge of breast cancer biology and in the treatment of the disease. However, the translation of these advances into clinical practice has been slow. With the advent of molecular-based medicine, it is hoped that the bridge between the bench and the bedside will continue to be shortened. Because breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with wide-ranging subsets of patients who have different prognoses and who respond differently to treatments, the identification of patients who need treatment and the definition of the best therapy for an individual have become the priorities in breast cancer care. This article will review the crucial role of prognostic and predictive factors in achieving these goals. A critical review of classical and newer individual molecular markers, such as hormone receptors, HER2, urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, cyclin E, topoisomerase II, and p53, was performed, and the preliminary results obtained using the new gene expression profiling technology are described along with their potential clinical implications.

Cyclin E Expression in Operable Breast Cancer Quantified Using Real-Time RT–PCR: A Comparative Study with Immunostaining

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this retrospective study was to compare cyclin E expression levels in operable breast cancer patients determined using real-time RT-PCR and immunostaining. The prognostic relevance of cyclin E was also investigated.

METHODS

Specimens of invasive ductal breast cancer tissues obtained from 124 women during radical mastectomy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the tumor samples, 40.3 and 59.7% showed high expression of cyclin E in RT-PCR and immunostaining, respectively. The overall agreement probability was 0.032 according to Scott's pi statistic. With a median follow-up of 55.5 months, cyclin E expression assessed using immunostaining was an independent negative prognostic factor in the node positive group (hazard ratio 3.1; 95% CI 1.0-9.2; P = 0.045). Cyclin E expression correlated with absence of steroid receptors and younger age. RT-PCR results did not predict survival in any group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Disagreement between real-time RT-PCR and immunostaining was demonstrated. Immunostaining seems to be the more reliable method for assessing cyclin E in breast cancer cells.

Identification and validation of prognostic markers in breast cancer with the complementary use of array-CGH and tissue microarrays

Gene amplification, an important mechanism of oncogene activation in breast cancer, can have both prognostic and therapeutic implications. In this work, an attempt is made to identify amplified genes that can be used to improve prognostication in breast cancer. A series of 52 node-negative tumours was screened for genomic gains at 57 loci by array-CGH. A subset of these genes was identified that could divide the series into two divergent outcome groups of either long-term survivors or early disease-related deaths (p = 0.01) using a combination of k-means clustering and statistical analysis. The prognostic significance of amplification of four of the genes (EMS1, TOP2A, CCNE1, and ERBB2) was then evaluated, using fluorescent in situ hybridization on a tissue microarray, in a second larger 'validation' series of 232 tumours with a median follow-up of 4.8 years. Adverse disease-related outcome was associated with amplification of TOP2A (p = 0.004); ERBB2 (p = 0.002); and with the combined amplification of TOP2A, ERBB2, and EMS1 (p = 0.01). EMS1 amplification was more common (26% of cases) than previously reported but, in isolation, had no prognostic significance. Amplification of CCNE1, seen in only 6% of cases, had no prognostic role. These results indicate that the complementary use of array-CGH and tissue microarrays has the potential to help in the identification and validation of molecular markers that can be used to classify breast cancers into different prognostic groups.

The NF-kappaB/IkappaB signaling system: a molecular target in breast cancer therapy

The nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) superfamily of eukaryotic transcription factors plays an important role in carcinogenesis. NF-kappaB and its regulators are linked to various signal transduction pathways as well as transcriptional activation events that mediate critical stages of cell proliferation. These intracellular signaling processes are thought to regulate chromatin structure to accommodate transcription, apoptosis, cell-cycle control, and cell transformation. In this capacity, uncontrolled or aberrant NF-kappaB activity may, in part, be responsible for breast cancer progression. Constitutive NF-kappaB expression may predict the metastatic potential of breast tumors, indicating early use of adjuvant therapy and suggesting NF-kappaB inhibition as a novel treatment. In this review, we discuss the regulatory mechanisms and physiological significance of NF-kappaB activation, and highlight recent advances in the development of NF-kappaB as an integral mediator of mammary carcinogenesis.

Identification of a three-gene expression signature of poor-prognosis breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical course of breast cancer is difficult to predict on the basis of established clinical and pathological prognostic criteria. Given the genetic complexity of breast carcinomas, it is not surprising that correlations with individual genetic abnormalities have also been disappointing. The use of gene expression profiles could result in more accurate and objective prognostication.

RESULTS

To this end, we used real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays to quantify the mRNA expression of a large panel (n = 47) of genes previously identified as candidate prognostic molecular markers in a series of 100 ERalpha-positive breast tumor samples from patients with known long-term follow-up. We identified a three-gene expression signature (BRCA2, DNMT3B and CCNE1) as an independent prognostic marker (P = 0.007 by univariate analysis; P = 0.006 by multivariate analysis). This "poor prognosis" signature was then tested on an independent panel of ERalpha-positive breast tumors from a well-defined cohort of 104 postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with primary surgery followed by adjuvant tamoxifen alone: although this "poor prognosis" signature was associated with shorter relapse-free survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.029), it did not persist as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the value of gene expression signatures in predicting the outcome of breast cancer.

Beyond lymph node staging: molecular predictors of outcome in breast cancer

This article briefly reviews the exciting, yet unproven, reports of alternate methods of predicting outcomes in breast cancer and highlights new molecular methods of diagnosing, classifying, and treating this disease. The author starts by reviewing well-known factors in breast cancer with which all alternate methods of staging and predicting outcomes must be compared prospectively.

Cyclin D1, cyclin E, and p21 have no apparent prognostic value in anal carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential prognostic and/or predictive value of the expression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, and p21 protein in a series of 98 anal carcinomas (T1–4, N0–3) treated by radiotherapy with (51) or without (47) chemotherapy in one institution. Correlation with Mib1 index and p53 expression was also investigated. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 124 months (range: 30–266). Immunohistochemical staining was performed on pretreatment biopsies, applying a standard ABC technique for cyclin D1 (clone DSC6, DAKO, 1 : 300), cyclin E (clone 13A3, Novocastra, 1 : 100), p21^WAF/CIP1 (clone SX118, DAKO, 1 : 50), p53 (clone DO7, DAKO, 1 : 200), and Mib1 (Ki-67, Dianova, 1 : 20). Tumours were classified into low- or high-expression groups according to the expression level of the protein considered. High expression was found in 51% of tumours for cyclin E, in 33.7% for cyclin D1, and in 65% for p21. None of those factors were significantly associated with clinical variables such as advanced T or N categories. In a monovariate analysis, advanced T and N categories and longer overall treatment time were the only variables that correlated significantly with low rate of local control (LC) and disease-free survival. However, in a subgroup analysis, high p21 expression correlated with a trend for significantly higher 5-year LC (87 vs 68%, P=0.07) in the N0 patients. The results of this study suggest that the cell-cycle proteins investigated are unlikely to be clinically useful in predicting treatment response or prognosis in patients with anal carcinomas.

Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly

Deregulation of cyclin E expression has been associated with a broad spectrum of human malignancies. Analysis of DNA replication in cells constitutively expressing cyclin E at levels similar to those observed in a subset of tumor-derived cell lines indicates that initiation of replication and possibly fork movement are severely impaired. Such cells show a specific defect in loading of initiator proteins Mcm4, Mcm7, and to a lesser degree, Mcm2 onto chromatin during telophase and early G1 when Mcm2-7 are normally recruited to license origins of replication. Because minichromosome maintenance complex proteins are thought to function as a heterohexamer, loading of Mcm2-, Mcm4-, and Mcm7-depleted complexes is likely to underlie the S phase defects observed in cyclin E-deregulated cells, consistent with a role for minichromosome maintenance complex proteins in initiation of replication and fork movement. Cyclin E-mediated impairment of DNA replication provides a potential mechanism for chromosome instability observed as a consequence of cyclin E deregulation.

Cyclin-E is a strong predictor of endocrine therapy failure in human breast cancer

Recently, cyclin-E was reported to be the most prominent prognostic factor for breast cancer outcome described so far, even surpassing axillary nodal involvement. Earlier studies on the prognostic value of cyclin-E in breast cancer, however, yielded heterogeneous results. Therefore, we set out to confirm and extend these results by quantitative Taqman RT-PCR of cyclin-E levels in 277 resectable breast cancers. Cyclin-E levels were not associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) in the total cohort of patients, or in the subset of patients without involved lymph nodes that were not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy. Besides several classical clinicopathological factors, the interaction between cyclin-E and adjuvant endocrine therapy (P=0.01, HR=3.04, 95% CI: 1.30-7.09) was found to contribute significantly in multivariate analyses. Cyclin-E levels were associated with poor RFS specifically in patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (n=108, P=0.001, HR=4.01, 95% CI: 1.76-9.12), independent of estrogen receptor status. In conclusion, cyclin-E is not a pure prognostic factor in breast cancer, but rather a predictor of failure of endocrine therapy. Differences in literature on the presumed prognostic value of cyclin-E may be due to differences in treatment. Assessment of cyclin-E levels can aid in improving adjuvant treatment selection.

Differential prognostic impact of the cyclins E and B in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with lymph node-negative breast cancer

Searching for new prognostic factors, we investigated the influence of cyclin expression on breast cancer prognosis. A total of 273 archival tumor specimens from patients with pT1/pT2 N0 breast cancers treated by surgery and local irradiation were immunostained for cyclins E, A and B. Outcome was evaluated as metastasis-free (MFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) over a median observation period of 99 months. In postmenopausal women, DSS was significantly predicted by cyclin E, and in premenopausal patients by cyclin B. No statistical significance was found for cyclin A. When the prognostic impact of cyclins was compared to that of standard prognostic indicators in a multivariate analysis, both cyclin E and cyclin B were selected as independent predictors of survival in postmenopausal and premenopausal patients, respectively. After inclusion of Ki-67 in the model, cyclin E lost its significance, whereas cyclin B remained the only independent prognostic factor with a hazard ratio of 4.5 (p = 0.026) for tumor-related death. Assessment of cyclin expression may, therefore, refine current prognostic models if considered in relation to menopausal status. The prognostic relevance of cyclins is likely attributable to an influence on proliferation, cell survival and genetic instability. Awareness of the molecular mechanisms leading to deregulated cyclin expression may guide decisions for risk-adapted therapy regimens.

Expression of cyclins E, A, and B, and prognosis in lymph node-negative breast cancer

Unexpected outcomes in breast cancer demand a refinement of prognostic criteria. This study therefore investigated the prognostic relevance of cyclin expression in a cohort of 332 T1-T2 N0 infiltrating ductal carcinomas with long-term follow-up (median 99 months). By univariate analysis, tumour size, histopathological grade, hormone receptor content, cyclin E, cyclin B, and the Ki-S5 (Ki-67) index significantly predicted disease-specific and metastasis-free survival. Cyclin A did not achieve statistical significance. In a multivariate analysis, both cyclin E [relative risk (RR) 2.01, p = 0.021] and cyclin B (RR 1.85, p = 0.033) were selected as independent prognosticators of metastasis-free survival when the Ki-67 index was omitted, but only cyclin E expression was associated with disease-specific survival (RR 2.56, p = 0.006). When Ki-67 was included as a covariate, cyclin E lost its significance with respect to disease-specific survival but remained significant for metastasis-free survival. In an analogous analysis including Ki-67, the number of concurrently overexpressed cyclins did not attain statistical significance regarding disease-specific survival but was selected as the leading predictor of metastatic disease. It is concluded that combined overexpression of cyclins may imply genetic instability enhancing metastatic potential, but that survival ultimately depends on the proliferative activity of tumour cells.

The prognostic impact of hormone receptors and c-erbB-2 in pregnancy-associated breast cancer and their correlation with BRCA1 and cell cycle modulators

A population-based series of 122 patients with pregnancy-associated breast carcinomas was histologically revised and the relationship between hormone receptors, c-erbB-2, BRCA1, p27, cyclin E, and cyclin D1 was studied. The 5-year overall survival was 41%; 70% had tumor size >20 mm; 72% had metastasized to regional lymph nodes; 95% were histologic grade II or III; 66% and 75% were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptor, respectively; and c-erbB-2 expression was high (44%). BRCA1 expression was reduced in 33% of the cases. The expression of p27, cyclin D1, and cyclin E was low, 11%, 9%, and 16%, respectively. Cyclin D1 was positively associated with the hormone receptors (p< or =0.01). In multivariate analysis, lymph node status, progesterone receptor, and c-erbB-2 were significant prognostic factors. In subdividing the group according to lymph node status, c-erbB-2 and progesterone receptor retained a prognostic significance in the node positive group only. In conclusion, pregnancy-associated breast carcinomas are aggressive tumors, with low expression of hormone receptors, BRCA1, p27, and cyclin E and D1, and high expression of c-erbB-2.

Clinical relevance of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The mammary sentinel lymph node procedure can increase the detection of axillary metastases by 45% compared with standard axillary dissection. Some investigators have reported that reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) increases metastasis detection even more, but it is uncertain whether a positive RT-PCR test in the face of a negative histological evaluation is clinically meaningful.

METHODS

RT-PCR for epithelial glycoprotein 2 and cytokeratin 19 was performed on sentinel and pooled nonsentinel axillary lymph nodes from 108 women with clinical stage I or II breast cancer who were followed up for a median of 40 months.

RESULTS

Axillary metastases were detected on standard tissue sections in 26% and by RT-PCR in 30%. Results for the two tests were concordant for 80% of the cases. RT-PCR upstaged 16%. Tumors from women whose lymph nodes were positive only by RT-PCR were phenotypically similar to those from women with no metastases detected by any method. Moreover, 4-year actuarial distant disease-free survival was 100% for women with metastases detected by RT-PCR only, as compared with 74% for those with metastases detected by routine histology (P =.03) and 93% for those with no metastases detected by either method (P =.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of sentinel lymph nodes by RT-PCR for epithelial glycoprotein 2 and cytokeratin 19 is unlikely to provide clinically useful information.

Cell cycle regulators in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications of p53 nuclear accumulation

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by a multistep process of tumorigenesis involving genes that control cell cycle progression. The prevalence and clinical implications of p53, p21, HDM-2, p27, and cyclin E immunoreactivity in MM patients, however, have not been fully elucidated. We evaluated the immunoreactivity (IR) for p53, p21, HDM-2, p27, cyclin E, and Ki-67 in bone marrow biopsies from 48 patients. In 34 (70.8%) cases, TP53 gene mutations and HDM-2 gene amplification were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and Southern blot densitometric analyses in the corresponding bone marrow aspirates. Nineteen (39.6%) biopsy specimens exhibited > or =10% neoplastic cells immunoreactive for p53, 23 (47.9%) for p21, 28 (58.3%) for HDM-2, 29 (60.4%) for cyclin E, and 16 (33.3%) for Ki-67; 23 (47.9%) tumors had > or =50% neoplastic cells immunoreactive for p27. TP53 gene mutations in exons 5 through 8 were detected in 3 (8.8%) cases, whereas none exhibited HDM-2 gene amplification. In the cases bearing a wild-type TP53 gene, no association was found between p53 accumulation and HDM-2 or p21 IR. The same cases had been previously investigated for the presence of the t(11;14) translocation and cyclin D1 IR; interestingly, a significant inverse correlation between cyclin D1 and p27 or cyclin E IR was noted. In addition to clinical stage and Bartl's histologic stage and grade, p53 accumulation was significantly associated with survival, and it maintained its prognostic significance in a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, clinical stage, and relapse. Our data suggest that the immunohistochemical evaluation of p53 IR in bone marrow biopsies may represent an adjunct in MM patient prognostication.

Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Cyclin E, a regulator of the cell cycle, affects the behavior of breast-cancer cells. We investigated whether levels of cyclin E in the tumor correlated with survival among patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Tumor tissue from 395 patients with breast cancer was assayed for cyclin E, cyclin D1, cyclin D3, and the HER-2/neu oncogene with the use of Western blot analysis. Full-length, low-molecular-weight, and total cyclin E were measured. Immunohistochemical assessments of cyclin E were also made of 256 tumors. We sought correlations between levels of these molecular markers and disease-specific and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.4 years. A high level of the low-molecular-weight isoforms of cyclin E, as detected by Western blotting, correlated strongly with disease-specific survival whether axillary lymph nodes were negative or positive for metastases (P<0.001). Among 114 patients with stage I breast cancer, none of the 102 patients with low levels of cyclin E in the tumor had died of breast cancer by five years after diagnosis, whereas all 12 patients with a high level of low-molecular-weight cyclin E had died of breast cancer within that period. In multivariate analysis, a high total cyclin E level or high levels of the low-molecular-weight forms of cyclin E were significantly correlated with poor outcome. The hazard ratio for death from breast cancer for patients with high total cyclin E levels as compared with those with low total cyclin E levels was 13.3--about eight times as high as the hazard ratios associated with other independent clinical and pathological risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of total cyclin E and low-molecular-weight cyclin E in tumor tissue, as measured by Western blot assay, correlate strongly with survival in patients with breast cancer.

Molecular markers in the diagnosis and staging of breast cancer

Considerable advances have been made in understanding the molecular events that accompany the development of breast cancer. Although our knowledge of these genetic alterations has greatly outpaced clinical applications, many new advances are beginning to have an impact on the diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Clinical evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2/neu status has become routine. The increasing use of these and other molecular markers promises to help refine diagnoses, define disease subsets, and provide more accurate information about the probable biologic outcome of a given tumor. Studies of molecular markers are also likely to lead to the identification and development of new therapeutic targets. I review the molecular markers currently used in the clinical diagnosis and staging of breast cancer, and discuss other potentially useful markers and assays.

Multiparameter analyses of cell cycle regulatory proteins in human breast cancer: a key to definition of separate pathways in tumorigenesis

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancer forms affecting many women. The disease nevertheless has widely varying behavior and therefore patient outcome, and an important undertaking is to define and understand the molecular mechanisms behind these actions. Defects in the G1/S transition in the cell cycle affect both tumor proliferation and the fidelity of check points responsible for chromosomal integrity and DNA damage response and has lately been shown to represent one of a rather limited set of key aberrations in the transformation process. Many cell cycle regulatory proteins are either oncogenes or suppressor genes or are closely associated to the transformation process. The types of aberrations in the G1/S transition seem to be different in various cancers but are nevertheless often linked to clinical behaviors. In this review the role of multiparameter analyses of cell cycle regulatory proteins in breast cancer will be outlined with special attention to pattern analyses as well as the definition of two contrasting pathways in tumorigenesis defined by either cyclin D1 or cyclin F overexpression.