Protein overexpression and gene amplification of c-erbB-2 in breast carcinomas: a comparative study of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues

Her-2/neu gene amplification and its correlation with other prognostic factors in Iranian breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is one of the most common diseases in females, arising from overexpression of a variety of oncogenes like HER2/neu. The amplification rate of this gene is variable in different breast cancer patients. In this study, the amplification of the HER2/neu oncogene was distinguished in breast cancer patients and its correlation with prognostic factors. Also, the simultaneous effect of prognostic factors on the occurrence of a specific prognostic factor was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The multiplex PCR technique was used to assay the amplification of the HER2/neu oncogene in breast cancer patients. After extracting DNA from 100 tumor tissue and 8 normal breast tissue samples, the amplification of the HER2/neu gene was distinguished by the co-amplification of a single-copy reference gene, γ-IFN, and the target gene HER2/neu in the PCR reaction and using the Gel analyzer software. SPSS 23 and STATA 9.1 software were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The HER2/neu gene was amplification in 30% of the tumor samples. The statistical analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between HER2/neu gene amplification and progesterone receptors. Amplification of the HER2/neu gene significantly increases the chance of lymph node involvement. Also, the amplification of this gene in tumors with histological grade II tissue is more than grade I.

CONCLUSION

The amplification of the HER2/neu gene can be used as an independent prognostic factor in predicting lymph node involvement and histological grade in breast cancer patients.

Targeting MET Amplification: Opportunities and Obstacles in Therapeutic Approaches

The MET gene plays a vital role in cellular proliferation, earning it recognition as a principal oncogene. Therapies that target MET amplification have demonstrated promising results both in preclinical models and in specific clinical cases. A significant obstacle to these therapies is the ability to distinguish between focal amplification and polysomy, a task for which simple MET copy number measurement proves insufficient. To effectively differentiate between the two, it is crucial to utilize comparative measures, including in situ hybridization (ISH) with the centromere or next generation sequencing (NGS) with adjacent genes. Despite the promising potential of MET amplification treatment, the judicious selection of patients is paramount to maximize therapeutic efficacy. The effectiveness of MET inhibitors can fluctuate depending on the extent of MET amplification. Future research must seek to establish the ideal threshold value for MET amplification, identify the most efficacious combination therapies, and innovate new targeted treatments for patients exhibiting MET amplification.

Characterization of HER2 gene amplification heterogeneity in invasive and in situ breast cancer using bright-field in situ hybridization

The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the HER2 gene amplification status in invasive and adjacent in situ breast carcinoma, using bright-field in situ hybridization, and to document the possible presence of HER2 genetic heterogeneity (HER2-GH) in both components. A cohort of 100 primary invasive carcinomas (IC) associated with carcinoma in situ (CIS) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by SISH according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline. A second cohort of all the cases with HER2-GH since the introduction of the updated ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline was also characterized, and an evaluation of the HER2 gene amplification in the CIS component, if present, was also done. In the first cohort, the HER2 amplification in the IC was negative in 87% of the cases and positive in 13% of the cases, without the presence of HER2-GH. All the cases had an associated CIS with the same HER2 status as IC, with four cases of CIS presenting HER2-GH. In the CIS, we observed a significant relationship of HER2 gene amplification with high nuclear grade. In the four cases with HER2-GH in CIS, two cases presented HER2 gene amplification in the IC. The second cohort included 12 cases with HER2-GH in a total of 1243 IC cases (0.97%). Additionally, we identified two cases associated with non-amplified CIS. HER2-GH is a rare event in IC and can already be present in CIS, not being an important step in the acquisition of invasive features.

Gene amplification of CCNE1, CCND1, and CDK6 in gastric cancers detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

New and effective treatments for advanced gastric cancer are urgently needed. Cyclins E and D1 form a complex with cyclin-dependent kinase 2, 4, or 6 to regulate G1-S transition. The G1-S regulatory genes encoding cyclin E (CCNE1), cyclin D1 (CCND1), and CDK6 (CDK6) are frequently amplified in gastric cancer and may therefore influence molecularly targeted therapies against ERBB2 or EGFR when coamplified. A total of 179 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded gastric cancer specimens were examined for these gene amplifications by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Amplification of at least 1 G1-S regulatory gene was found in 35 tumors (CCNE1 amplification, 15% of samples; CCND1, 6%; CDK6, 1%). In 13 of the 35 tumors, dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization identified coamplification of the G1-S regulatory genes with ERBB2, EGFR, and/or KRAS in single cancer nuclei. The observation that cells with G1-S regulatory gene amplification contained clonal subpopulations with coamplification of ERBB2, EGFR, or KRAS in 5 early and 3 advanced cancers suggests that amplification of the G1-S regulatory genes represents an early event, which precedes ERBB2, EGFR, or KRAS amplification. Amplified CCNE1, CCND1, and CDK6 in advanced gastric cancer may be potentially useful as direct targets for molecular therapy or for combination therapy with ERBB2 or EGFR inhibitors. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification could be a useful tool for identification of patients who would benefit from such therapies.

Intratumoral heterogeneity as a source of discordance in breast cancer biomarker classification

BACKGROUND

Spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression may impact breast cancer classification. The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression within tumors, to identify technical and biological factors contributing to spatial heterogeneity, and to examine the impact of discordant biomarker status within tumors on clinical record agreement.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed using two to four cores (1.0 mm) for each of 1085 invasive breast cancers from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which is part of the AMBER Consortium. Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was quantified using automated digital imaging analysis. The biomarker status for each core and for each case was assigned using clinical thresholds. Cases with core-to-core biomarker discordance were manually reviewed to distinguish intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity from misclassification of biomarker status by the automated algorithm. The impact of core-to-core biomarker discordance on case-level agreement between TMAs and the clinical record was evaluated.

RESULTS

On the basis of automated analysis, discordant biomarker status between TMA cores occurred in 9 %, 16 %, and 18 % of cases for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Misclassification of benign epithelium and/or ductal carcinoma in situ as invasive carcinoma by the automated algorithm was implicated in discordance among cores. However, manual review of discordant cases confirmed spatial heterogeneity as a source of discordant biomarker status between cores in 2 %, 7 %, and 8 % of cases for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Overall, agreement between TMA and clinical record was high for ER (94 %), PR (89 %), and HER2 (88 %), but it was reduced in cases with core-to-core discordance (agreement 70 % for ER, 61 % for PR, and 57 % for HER2).

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity may impact breast cancer classification accuracy, with implications for clinical management. Both manually confirmed biomarker heterogeneity and misclassification of biomarker status by automated image analysis contribute to discordant biomarker status between TMA cores. Given that manually confirmed heterogeneity is uncommon (<10 % of cases), large studies are needed to study the impact of heterogeneous biomarker expression on breast cancer classification and outcomes.

The Use of TMA for Interlaboratory Validation of FISH Testing for Detection of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancer

HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for breast cancer is largely limited to academic centers and commercial laboratories. As testing demands increase, methods for rapid and cost-effective technical validation and quality assessment will be required. Tissue microarray (TMA), a technique for high-throughput biomarker evaluation, could help facilitate these needs. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of TMA technology for validation of HER2 FISH testing. Two TMA blocks containing paired cores from 41 breast cancers were constructed. HER2 FISH was performed in parallel at two institutions and the results compared. One institution, with considerable HER2 FISH experience, served as the reference laboratory. HER2 chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were compared to the FISH results. For positive and negative results, the concordance rate between laboratories was 100%. Using kappa statistical analysis to determine interobserver agreement, HER2 to chromosome 17 gene copy ratios showed strong agreement between laboratories with kappa = 0.85 (perfect agreement = 1.0). Four cases displaying low-level amplification by CISH contained chromosome 17 polysomy and gene copy ratios of <2.0 by FISH. Good concordance was observed between HER2 IHC and in situ hybridization testing. TMA is a robust and effective method for the technical validation of HER2 FISH testing and should be considered for use by quality assessment programs.

Overexpression and gene amplification of both ERBB2 and EGFR in an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and immunohistochemistry

EGFR and ERBB2 belong to the EGFR gene family. In esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), amplification of EGFR or ERBB2 is usually mutually exclusive. EGFR amplification occurs in approximately 15% of SCCs, ERBB2 occurs in less than 5%. Here, we report the co-amplification of EGFR and ERBB2 in an ulcerative and infiltrating-type SCC that measured approximately 4.2 × 2.7 × 1.2 cm with a superficial lesion occurring in the thoracic esophagus of a 72-year-old man. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification using representative tumor sections showed gain of CCND1 and coincident amplification of ERBB2 or EGFR or neither. Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that the tumor comprised three cancer-cell populations: well-differentiated SCC with high-level ERBB2 amplification and ERBB2 overexpression, more infiltrative poorly-differentiated SCC with high-level EGFR amplification and EGFR overexpression, and poorly-differentiated SCC lacking any ERBB2 or EGFR abnormality. These three populations each had low-level CCND1 amplification and nuclear cyclin D1 overexpression. This histological topology and gene amplification combinations suggested that genetic instability first produced CCND1 amplification, and then ERBB2 or EGFR gene amplification occurred. It is further speculated that during cancer progression and clonal selection indecisive predominance of either clone caused the rare co-amplification of ERBB2 and EGFR in a single chimeric tumor.

Semi-comprehensive analysis of gene amplification in gastric cancers using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

The prognosis of patients with gastric carcinomas at an advanced stage still remains dismal, and therefore novel therapeutic modalities are urgently needed. Since the successful targeting of amplified ERBB2 with a humanized monoclonal antibody, the amplified genes of other receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR, FGFR2, and MET, as well as those of other cell regulator genes, are being considered as candidate targets of molecular therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the amplification status of 26 genes, which are frequently amplified in solid cancers, in advanced gastric cancers. A total of 93 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded advanced gastric cancer tissues were examined by multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification, and 32 cases with 'gain' or 'amplified' status of 16 genes were further examined for the respective gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and for the respective protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. The frequencies of gene amplifications in advanced gastric cancers were as follows: ERBB2 (13 cases, 14%), FGFR2 (7 cases, 8%), MYC (7 cases, 8%), TOP2A (7 cases, 8%), MET (4 cases, 4%), MDM2 (4 cases, 4%), CCND1 (3 cases, 3%), FGF10 (2 cases, 3%), and EGFR (1 case, 1%). Amplification of the receptor tyrosine kinases genes occurred in a mutually exclusive manner except for one tumor in which ERBB2 and FGFR2 were both amplified but in different cancer cells. Co-amplification of ERBB2 and MYC, and EGFR and CCND1, in single nuclei but on different amplicons, was confirmed in one case each. Attempts at correlating the FISH status with the immunohistochemical staining pattern showed variable results from complete concordance to no correlation. In conclusion, combination of multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification and FISH analysis is a feasible approach for obtaining the semi-comprehensive genetic information that is necessary for personalized molecular targeted therapy.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in primary breast cancer in the era of standardized testing: a Canadian prospective study

PURPOSE

Therapies that target overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) rely on accurate and timely assessment of all patients with new diagnoses. This study examines HER2 testing of primary breast cancer tissue when performed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and additional in situ hybridization (ISH) for negative cases (IHC 0/1+). The analysis focuses on the rate of false-negative HER2 tests, defined as IHC 0/1+ with an ISH ratio ≥ 2.0, in eight pathology centers across Canada.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Whole sections of surgical resections or tissue microarrays (TMAs) from invasive breast carcinoma tissue were tested by both IHC and ISH using standardized local methods. Samples were scored by the local breast pathologist, and consecutive HER2-negative IHC results (IHC 0/1+) were compared with the corresponding fluorescence or silver ISH result.

RESULTS

Overall, 711 surgical excisions of primary breast cancer were analyzed by IHC and ISH; HER2 and chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) counts were available in all cases. The overall rate of false-negative samples was 0.84% (six of 711 samples). Interpretable IHC and ISH scores were available in 1,212 cases from TMAs, and the overall rate of false-negative cases was 1.6% (16 of 978 cases).

CONCLUSION

Our observation confirms that IHC is an adequate test to predict negative HER2 status in primary breast cancer in surgical excision specimens, even when different antibodies and IHC platforms are used. The study supports the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists and Canadian testing algorithms of using IHC followed by ISH for equivocal cases.

Intratumoral heterogeneous amplification of ERBB2 and subclonal genetic diversity in gastric cancers revealed by multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

A humanized monoclonal antibody against ERBB2 is used in neoadjuvant therapy for patients with gastric cancer. A critical factor in determining patient eligibility and predicting outcomes of this therapy is the intratumoral heterogeneity of ERBB2 amplification in gastric adenocarcinomas. The aims of this study are to assess the underlying mechanisms of intratumoral heterogeneity of ERBB2 amplification; to characterize the diversity of coamplified oncogenes such as EGFR, FGFR2, MET, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2; and to examine the usefulness of multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in the semicomprehensive detection of these gene amplifications. A combined analysis of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed ERBB2-amplified cancer cells in 51 of 475 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded gastric adenocarcinomas. The fraction of amplification-positive cells in each tumor ranged from less than 10% to almost 100%. Intratumoral heterogeneity of ERBB2 amplification, defined as less than 50% of cancer cells positive for ERBB2 amplification, was found in 41% (21/51) of ERBB2-amplified tumors. The combined analysis of MLPA and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that ERBB2 was coamplified with EGFR in 7 tumors, FGFR2 in 1 tumor, and FGFR2 and MET in 1 tumor; however, the respective genes were amplified in mutually exclusive cells. Coamplified ERBB2 and MYC coexisted within single nuclei in 4 tumors, and one of these cases had suspected coamplification in the same amplicon of ERBB2 with MYC. In conclusion, the amplification status of ERBB2 and other genes can be obtained semicomprehensively by MLPA and could be useful to plan individualized molecularly targeted therapy against gastric cancers.

Multicentre phase II trial of trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic pancreatic cancer

Background:

New therapeutic options for metastatic pancreatic cancer are urgently needed. In pancreatic cancer, overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been reported in up to 45%. This multicentre phase II study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the HER2 antibody trastuzumab combined with capecitabine in the patients with pancreatic cancer and HER2 overexpression.

Methods:

Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after 12 weeks. A total of 212 patients were screened for HER2 expression.

Results:

Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER2 expression was: 83 (40%) grade 0, 71 (34%) grade 1, 31 (15%) grade 2, 22 (11%) grade 3. A total of 17 patients with IHC +3 HER2 expression or gene amplification could be assessed for the treatment response. Grade 3/4 treatment toxicities were: each 7% leucopenia, diarrhoea, nausea and hand-foot syndrome. Progression-free survival after 12 weeks was 23.5%, median overall survival (OS) 6.9 months.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates +3 HER2 expression or gene amplification in 11% of patients. Contrary to breast and gastric cancer, only 7 out of 11 (64%) patients with IHC +3 HER2 expression showed gene amplification. Although the therapy was well tolerated, PFS and OS did not perform favourably compared with standard chemotherapy. Together, we do not recommend further evaluation of anti-HER2 treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

High concordance between two companion diagnostics tests: a concordance study between the HercepTest and the HER2 FISH pharmDx kit

The present study was done to investigate the concordance between the HER2 status measured by immunohistochemical analysis (HercepTest, DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; HER2 FISH pharmDx, DAKO) in a large study cohort (n = 681) of patients with high-risk breast cancer. A high agreement between immunohistochemical and FISH results was demonstrated. For the whole study population, the agreement between the 2 assays was 93.1% with a corresponding κ coefficient of 0.85. When the equivocal immunohistochemical 2+ cases were excluded from the analysis (n = 79), the agreement increased to 95.0% with a κ coefficient of 0.90. When the cutoff value for amplified/nonamplified cases in the HER2 FISH assay was increased from 2.0 to 2.2 as recommended in the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines, the concordance between the 2 assays was 94.3% with a κ coefficient of 0.87 in the whole study population. When the equivocal immunohistochemical 2+ cases were excluded from this analysis, the concordance is similar (95.7% with a κ coefficient of 0.91).

EGFR and HER2 expression in advanced biliary tract cancer

AIM: To analyze the pathogenetic role and potential clinical usefulness of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS: EGFR and HER2 expression was studied in biopsy samples from 124 patients (51% women; median age 64.8 years), with advanced BTC diagnosed between 1997 and 2004. Five micrometers sections of paraffin embedded tissue were examined by standard, FDA approved immunohistochemistry. Tumors with scores of 2+ or 3+ for HER2 expression on immunochemistry were additionally tested for HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

RESULTS: 34/124 patients (27.4%) had gallbladder cancer, 47 (37.9%) had intrahepatic BTC and 43 (34.7%) had extrahepatic or perihilar BTC. EGFR expression was examined in a subset of 56 samples. EGFR expression was absent in 22/56 tumors (39.3%). Of the remaining samples expression was scored as 1+ in 12 (21.5%), 2+ in 13 (23.2%) and 3+ in 9 (16%), respectively. HER2 expression was as follows: score 0 73/124 (58.8%), score 1+ 27/124 (21.8%), score 2+ 21/124 (17%) and score 3+ 4/124 (3.2%). HER2 gene amplification was present in 6/124, resulting in an overall amplification rate of 5%.

CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that routine testing and therapeutic targeting of HER2 does not seem to be useful in patients with BTC, while targeting EGFR may be promising.

Comparison of fluorescent in situ hybridization HER-2/neu results on core needle biopsy and excisional biopsy in primary breast cancer

HER-2/neu status is critical for the therapy for breast carcinoma. Fluorescent in situ hybridization for gene amplification and immunohistochemical stains for protein expression are widely used methods to detect HER-2/neu status. Multiple studies have shown fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical stain results to have high concordance rates. To our knowledge, a comparison between fluorescent in situ hybridization results for core needle biopsy and the subsequent excisional biopsy specimens has not yet been studied. We retrospectively evaluated the fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical results in both the breast core needle and the excisional biopsy of 125 patients with invasive breast carcinoma from 2002 to 2005. There was complete concordance with respect to both immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization results for core needle biopsy and excisional biopsy specimens in 87% of the patients evaluated. Comparison of fluorescent in situ hybridization results of the 129 core needle biopsies to the 131 excisional biopsies of all 125 patients showed a concordance rate of 92%. The immunohistochemical stain results of the same core needle and excisional biopsies showed a concordance rate of 98%. Comparison of the immunohistochemical stain results with the fluorescent in situ hybridization results for all 260 cases examined showed 95% concordance. On the basis of our study, we observed that repeating HER-2/neu testing by immunohistochemical stain and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization methods on excisional biopsy is not unreasonable, in particular in cases of intratumoral heterogeneity, indeterminate/borderline HER-2/neu results and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The role of HER2 in early breast cancer metastasis and the origins of resistance to HER2-targeted therapies

The HER2 gene encodes the receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 and is often over-expressed or amplified in breast cancer. Up-regulation of HER2 contributes to tumor progression. Many aspects of tumor growth are favorably affected through activation of HER2 signaling. Indeed, HER2 plays a role in increasing proliferation and survival of the primary tumor and distant lesions which upon completion of full transformation cause metastases. P185(HER2/neu) receptors and signaling from them and associated molecules increase motility of both intravasating and extravasating cells, decrease apoptosis, enhance signaling interactions with the microenvironment, regulate adhesion, as well as a multitude of other functions. Recent experimental and clinical evidence supports the view that the spread of incompletely transformed cells occurs at a very early stage in tumor progression. This review concerns the identification and characterization of HER2, the evolution of the metastasis model, and the more recent cancer stem cell model. In particular, we review the evidence for an emerging mechanism of HER2(+) breast cancer progression, whereby the untransformed HER2-expressing cell shows characteristics of stem/progenitor cell, metastasizes, and then completes its final transformation at the secondary site.

Interphase FISH as a new tool in tumor pathology

Interphase FISH (IFISH) analysis is an intriguing molecular cytogenetic approach to study chromosome abnormalities in cancer. IFISH is a high sensitivity technique because of its ability to identify aberrations on a cell-to-cell level. The possibility to perform IFISH on different types of nuclei obtained both from fresh and archived samples, makes this technique an advantageous method to identify specific chromosome aberrations in cancer and correlate them to prognosis and therapy. The aim of this review is to outline the technical aspects, the sensitivity and specificity and the current strategies for employment of IFISH in tumor pathology, and to discuss the enormous range of novel applications.

Low-level TOP2A amplification in prostate cancer is associated with HER2 duplication, androgen resistance, and decreased survival

HER2 and TOP2A genes, located on 17q, can be coamplified in cancer. Overexpression of both genes has been reported in high-grade, androgen-resistant prostate cancer. Both genes have not been compared in a single prostate cancer study and the frequency of TOP2A amplifications in prostate cancer is unknown. Using tissue microarrays, we did immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2 and TOP2A in 100 prostate cancers (41 localized and 59 advanced) and 42 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Amplification was defined as a target/centromere signal ratio of > or =1.5. HER2 immunohistochemistry was scored from 0 to 3+. Percentage nuclei staining for topoisomerase IIalpha (topoIIalpha) was recorded; overexpression was defined as > or =5% cells staining. Eighteen (31%) advanced prostate cancers showed topoIIalpha overexpression; 12 (26%) showed TOP2A low-level amplification; 9 (16%) expressed HER2; and 6 (13%) showed HER2 low-level amplification. No high-level amplification of either gene (target/centromere signal ratio of > or =3.0) was detected. TOP2A coexpression and coamplification were seen in 75% and 66% of HER2-positive cases, respectively. Localized prostate cancer or BPH showed no gene amplification or topoIIalpha overexpression. Gene amplification or overexpression correlated with high stage and Gleason score. The presence of TOP2A amplification in advanced cancer was associated with androgen resistance and decreased survival by multivariate analysis. This is the first study to document low-level TOP2A amplification in prostate cancer and an association with reduced survival. TOP2A amplification may occur with or without HER2 duplication and is often associated with topoIIalpha expression. Therapies directed against topoIIalpha (and HER2) in such patients may improve survival.

Tissue microarray technology in breast cancer HER2 diagnostics

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) as current medical research tools significantly lower the costs of immunohistochemical examinations (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) while enabling high levels of standardization and reliability. Taking HER2 testing of breast cancer into consideration, we assessed the routine applicability of TMAs. A hundred and seventy-four consecutive samples of invasive breast cancer cases were selected. TMAs were constructed in order to conduct double HER2 immunohistochemical analysis and FISH abreast using the conventional slide by slide method. Comparing the immunohistochemical data obtained from TMAs with the routinely processed large sections, we found a 94.5%/92.7%, 85.7%/88.9% and 91.2%/90% concordance at immunohistochemically HER2-negative, HER2 2+ and 3+ cases using the CB11/HercepTest, respectively. FISH performed on TMAs helped to determine Herceptin therapy suitability in all cases, and when discordance was found, we controlled FISH on "large sections". Being able to conduct FISH examinations at a reasonable price with or without prior immunohistochemical analysis, departments confronted with a certain frequency of breast cancer cases might extensively use the type of TMAs applied in our study. This is a relieve not only with regard to diagnostic work using microarrays, but this also allows to take new directions in research by shedding light on certain unusual cases.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity of HER2/neu in Breast Cancer?A Rare Event

HER2/neu is overexpressed in about 20% of invasive breast carcinomas. Numerous studies have shown that there is high level of concordance between the HER2/neu status of the primary breast cancer and the metastases of a given patient. Recently, changes in HER2/neu status with tumor progression have been reported, suggesting the possibility of an emerging different tumor clone. Little is known about intratumoral heterogeneity with regard to HER2/neu oncoprotein overexpression. We identified nine cases of invasive ductal carcinoma that showed intratumoral variation in HER2/neu oncoprotein expression by immunohistochemistry. This was confirmed by the intratumoral variation in the amplification status of the HER2/neu gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization and by chromogenic in situ hybridization. The results of this study suggest that some cases of primary breast carcinoma are heterogeneous in regard to HER2/neu gene amplification or protein overexpression. Heterogeneity of HER2/neu status in a tumor may be a rare event or underestimated. This phenomenon should be examined as it may contribute to a better understanding of the variation in therapeutic responses and the conflicting data in studies about the prognostic and predictive role of HER2/neu status in subsets of breast cancer patients.

Heat-induced antigen retrieval: mechanisms and application to histochemistry

Since the introduction of the fluorescence-labeled antibody method by Coons et al. [Immunological properties of antibody containing a fluorescent group. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 47, 200-2002], many immunohistochemical methods have been refined to obtain high sensitivity with low background staining at both light and electron microscopic levels. Heat-induced antigen retrieval (HIAR) reported by Shi et al. in the early 1990s has greatly contributed to immunohistochemical analysis for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) materials, particularly in the field of pathology. Although antigen retrieval techniques including enzyme digestion, treatment with protein denaturants and heating have been considered tricky and mysterious techniques, the mechanisms of HIAR have been rapidly elucidated. Heating cleaves crosslinks (methylene bridges) and add methylol groups in formaldehyde-fixed proteins and nucleic acids and extends polypeptides to unmask epitopes hidden in the inner portion of antigens or covered by adjacent macromolecules. In buffers having an appropriate pH and ion concentration, epitopes are exposed without entangling the extended polypeptides during cooling process, since polypeptides may strike a balance between hydrophobic attraction force and electrostatic repulsion force. Recent studies have demonstrated that HIAR is applicable for immunohistochemistry with various kinds of specimens, i.e., FFPE materials, frozen sections, plastic-embedded specimens, and physically fixed tissues at both the light- and electron-microscopic levels, and have suggested that the mechanism of HIAR is common to aldehyde-fixed and aldehyde-unfixed materials. Furthermore, heating has been shown to be effective for flow cytometry, nucleic acid histochemistry (fluorescein in situ hybridization (FISH), in situ hybridization (ISH), and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick labeling (TUNEL)), and extraction and analysis of macromolecules in both FFPE archive materials and specimens processed by other procedures. In this article, we review mechanism of HIAR and application of heating in both immunohistochemistry and other histochemical reactions.

HER-2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) compared with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in breast cancer—A study of two hundred cases

The purpose of the study was to compare two methods used to analyse HER-2 gene amplification (fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH)), and determine the accuracy of the antibodies CB11 and HercepTest for immunohistochemical detection of HER-2 overexpression from archival breast cancer tissue. Additionally, interobserver variability in the interpretation of CISH and immunohistochemical tests was measured. Two hundred cases of invasive breast carcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2003 were selected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with HercepTest and CB11, and gene amplification was determined by FISH (PathVision, Vysis) and CISH (Zymed) using tissue macroarrays. An excellent concordance (94.8%) was found between CISH and FISH. Considering FISH as gold standard, sensitivity of CISH was 97.5% and specificity 94%. Overall interobserver agreement of CISH was 97.5% and of IHC 84%. Both antibodies showed a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 70.7% (CB11) and 81.2% (HercepTest). Our results show that CISH is a highly accurate, reproducible and practical technique to determine HER-2 gene amplification. CB11 and HercepTest are good screening methods with a high sensitivity. The performance of tissue macroarrays to test HER-2 status by IHC, FISH and CISH has demonstrated to be an available and effective method to study large series of tumours.

Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?

BACKGROUND

The majority of cases of breast cancer scoring HER2 weak positive (2+) on immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the HercepTest are not associated with amplification of the HER2/neu gene.

AIM

To examine the reproducibility of IHC in cases scoring 2+ subsequently shown to have gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 153 cases referred for FISH confirmation of a weak positive HercepTest (2+) result was performed. Repeat IHC was undertaken in cases with weak positive (2+) referral IHC and amplification of the HER2 gene by FISH.

RESULTS

Amplification of the HER2 gene was confirmed in 29/153 cases (19%) scoring 2+ on IHC. Repeat IHC was carried out on 25 IHC 2+ cases: 7 (28%) scored 2+ on repeat IHC, 18 (72%) scored 3+ and were reclassified as strong positive. A heterogeneous expression pattern was present in 3/17 cases scoring 3+.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of HercepTest 2+ results are not accompanied by gene amplification and represent "false positive" IHC in terms of prognostic or therapeutic relevance. A small proportion of HercepTest 2+ scores represent true 2+ IHC positive cases accompanied by gene amplification: a category probably biologically related to 3+ IHC cases. The remainder of cases of HercepTest 2+ accompanied by gene amplification represent a category of referral IHC 2+ weak positive, FISH amplified, repeat IHC 3+ strong positive, best described as "false negative 2+ IHC". This has implications for selection of cases for FISH analysis where weak positive (2+) IHC score is used as a triage for FISH testing, and for testing strategies in referral laboratories undertaking FISH analysis.

EGFR protein overexpression and gene amplification in squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus

Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is observed in many cancers, sometimes accompanied by gene amplification. Recently, several clinical therapies targeting EGFR were developed, but the eligibility criteria for these therapies is not fully established. To develop such eligibility criteria for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), we sought to clarify: (i) the exact frequency of EGFR overexpression, (ii) the relationship between protein overexpression and gene amplification, (iii) the relationship between gene amplification and specific gene mutations and (iv) the correlation between the status of EGFR and clinical or pathological features. Immunohistochemistry revealed that EGFR protein is overexpressed in 53 (50%) of the 106 ESCC examined. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) indicated clear EGFR gene amplification in 15 of the 53 tumors, somewhat higher EGFR copy in 32 cases, and no increase in 6 cases. Gene amplification was significantly associated with high level overexpression. Direct sequencing of exons 19 and 21 of EGFR revealed no mutations in 15 tumors exhibiting gene amplification, and no mutations in 25 tumors not exhibiting gene amplification. Overexpression of EGFR was significantly correlated with depth of invasion of the tumor. In conclusion, anti-EGFR therapies may be appropriate for patients with ESCC. We assume that combined analyses by immunohistochemistry/FISH would clarify aberrations in protein and gene function, and could help to identify those patients who may benefit from anti-EGFR therapy.

Correlation of HER2 Gene Amplification with Immunohistochemistry in Breast Cancer as Determined by a Novel Monoplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay

Amplification of the HER2 oncogene in breast cancer identifies patients who are likely to respond to anti-HER2 mAb therapy. Current clinical practice dictates that all breast cancers first undergo HER2 screening by IHC. Strongly positive (3+ on a 0-to-3+ scale) IHC cases are considered as HER2-amplified tumors and are not evaluated further because of the strong correlation between HER2 gene amplification as measured by FISH and 3+ IHC. This strong correlation has recently been questioned, and some data suggest that over 50% of 3+ IHC HER2 immunostains may not be due to HER2 gene amplification. To help resolve this discrepancy, the authors developed a quantitative PCR assay for HER2. Quantitative PCR was used to determine the amount of HER2 DNA relative to a control gene, IF2 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor, 2p11.1-q11.1). The PCR assay is performed on genomic DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue. The PCR assay developed is a monoplex assay in which the HER2 and IF2 PCRs are performed in separate cuvettes. Cases of HER2 FISH amplified breast cancer and HER2 FISH nonamplified breast cancer were chosen for study by monoplex HER2 PCR. HER2 overexpression was evaluated by IHC. Twenty-two cases of HER2-positive and 22 cases of HER2-negative breast cancer, as determined by FISH, were assayed for HER2 by PCR and IHC. Sixteen of the 44 cases were interpreted as 3+ IHC. All 16 showed HER2 amplification by PCR and 15 showed HER2 amplification by FISH. One FISH negative case was found to be HER2 amplified by PCR and showed 3+ IHC stain, suggesting the FISH result in this case was underinterpreted. Two FISH positive cases were found to be negative by PCR and negative in IHC as well, suggesting the FISH result in these cases was overinterpreted. The authors conclude that 3+ IHC membrane staining correctly identifies neoplasms showing HER2 gene amplification. Monoplex HER2 PCR may offer significant advantages over both IHC and FISH for HER2 testing in breast cancer.

Biological variables and prognosis of DCIS

Based on current knowledge, biological factors that have been investigated in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) include histology of these lesions, the impact of margin status on local recurrence, and several genetic alterations. Optimal integration of these factors in guiding optimal therapy is of great importance, since the incidence of DCIS is rising as a result of population-based mammographic screening. Mastectomy will almost always cure patients with DCIS but represents overtreatment for many. Less extensive treatment options should combine an optimal cosmetic result with the same safety for outcome of disease as mastectomy. To guide such optimal treatment, histological classification is not sufficient and additional biological factors are being investigated for their ability to predict outcome for individual patients with DCIS. In this review, the histological classification of DCIS is described and in addition the emerging knowledge on genetic alterations is summarised. For clinical management of DCIS patients, genetic or other biological factors should be identified that can predict the risk of progression of DCIS to invasive breast cancer and distant metastases. At present, insufficient knowledge on prognostic and predictive factors in DCIS is available. Research in this area is hampered by the difficulties in obtaining DCIS tumour tissue, as the tumour cells grow in the lumen of pre-existing ducts and lobules. As the recurrence rates are relatively low and the most relevant clinical endpoint, distant metastases, is indeed very rare, large numbers of patients (hundreds to a few thousand) need to be studied. Integration of translational studies into clinical trials aimed at optimising the treatment of DCIS are required to achieve this goal.

Simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in paraffin-embedded breast cancer

The determination of HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas has become essential for the selection of breast cancer patients for Herceptin therapy. Herceptin treatment is used in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma with HER2/neu protein overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or gene amplification analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A multiparametric fluorescent approach based on the simultaneous detection of HER2/neu gene amplification and protein expression was established to increase the accuracy, and to improve the reproducibility, of HER2/neu diagnostics. Based on four paraffin-embedded breast cancer cell lines, a combined fluorescent immunostaining (FIHC) and FISH method was developed by using the PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe Kit (VYSIS) and the polyclonal antibody from the HercepTest (DAKO). Diagnostic applicability was documented on 215 formalin-fixed primary breast carcinomas. Criteria for immunofluorescence quantification were chosen by analogy with the FDA-approved HercepTest scoring, ranging from 0 to 3+. There was 97.7% concordance between conventional IHC and fluorescence IHC. The FISH data resulting from the multiparametric approach did not differ from conventional FISH. Breast carcinomas with HER2/neu protein overexpression and simultaneous gene amplification were detected with 100% sensitivity. In addition, five of the 215 cases (2.3%) had HER2/neu gene amplification without protein overexpression. The main advantage of this novel approach is that polysomy, aneuploidy, gene amplification, and protein content can be analysed simultaneously in the same cell.

Protein overexpression and gene amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor in nonsmall cell lung carcinomas. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization study

BACKGROUND

Recently, molecular therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been developed for clinical use. The current study was conducted to determine 1) the exact frequency of EGFR protein overexpression, 2) the correlation between protein overexpression and EGFR amplification, and 3) the correlation between the status of the genetic and clinicopathologic features in nonsmall cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC).

METHODS

In total, 181 NSCLC samples were examined immunohistochemically using an antibody against EGFR, and tumor cells that exhibited overexpression were examined further for EGFR amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Overexpression of EGFR protein was found in 34% of the tumors. Among these, EGFR amplification was demonstrated in 74%. High-level gene amplification was found exclusively in tumors cells with high protein expression. In most of these tumors, cells that exhibited EGFR overexpression and gene amplification were distributed heterogeneously, even within a single tumor nodule. Statistically, EGFR overexpression was correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis and with a more advanced pathologic stage. Moreover, in adenocarcinomas, gene amplification was correlated significantly with lymph node metastasis and tended to be correlated with a more advanced pathologic stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The overexpression of EGFR in NSCLC was accompanied predominantly, but not exclusively, by gene amplification. It is important to evaluate not only protein overexpression but also the EGFR status to design adjuvant therapies for patients with NSCLC, because specimens that exhibit both protein overexpression and gene amplification may predict eventual lymph node metastasis and, possibly, aggressive tumor behavior.

COX-2, c-KIT and HER-2/neu expression in uterine carcinosarcomas: prognostic factors or potential markers for targeted therapies?

OBJECTIVES

Uterine carcinosarcomas are uncommon, highly aggressive neoplasms that frequently recur after surgical treatment and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Patients with recurrent disease respond poorly to salvage chemotherapy and irradiation. New therapeutic options are required for patients with metastatic disease. Clinical evidences showing the effect of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, STI571, in c-KIT-positive gastrointestinal tumors, the role of COX-inhibitors chemotherapy-associated in colorectal cancer patients and the successful therapeutic possibility of anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast carcinoma, have encouraged us to study the expression of c-KIT, COX-2 and HER-2/neu in uterine carcinosarcomas.

METHODS

We analyzed the expression of COX-2, c-KIT and HER-2/neu in 24 uterine carcinosarcomas and their correlation with clinical outcome. Disease-free interval and actuarial survival rates were the end points of the study.

RESULTS

High staining intensity for COX-2 was observed in 8 cases (33.3%). C-KIT was expressed in 4 cases (16.7%) and HER-2/neu in 7 cases (29.2%). Patients with COX-2-positive tumors had a significantly poorer disease-free interval and survival (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively). All patients with c-KIT-positive tumors had early stage disease. In spite of this, their survival was not significantly better than that of c-KIT-negative cases. HER-2/neu expression did not show any correlation with clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

c-KIT, COX-2, and HER-2/neu were expressed in different proportions of uterine carcinosarcomas. COX-2 expression was a strong indicator of unfavorable prognosis. These results warrant further study to evaluate the possible role of a new molecularly targeted cancer therapy with COX-2 inhibitors in patients with uterine carcinosarcomas. The role of c-KIT expression and consequently the hypothetical use of STI571 should be tested in a larger series.

Protein overexpression and gene amplification of HER-2 and EGFR in colorectal cancers: an immunohistochemical and fluorescent in situ hybridization study

Overexpression of HER-2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been observed in many cancers, sometimes accompanied by gene amplification. To assess whether novel chemotherapies targeting these overexpressed proteins may be effective for the treatment of colorectal cancers, we examined the exact frequency of HER-2 and EGFR overexpression, the relationship between gene amplification and protein expression, and the heterogeneity of gene amplification within and between primary and metastatic tumors. We evaluated 244 colorectal cancers immunohistochemically. All tumors found to overexpress HER-2 or EGFR were further analyzed for gene amplification by fluorescent in situ DNA hybridization. Overexpression of HER-2 and EGFR was found in 8 (3%) and 19 (8%) of the 244 colorectal carcinomas, respectively. Gene amplification was observed in 100 and 58% of the tumors exhibiting HER-2 and EGFR overexpression, respectively. HER-2 amplification in cancer cells was characterized by clusters of hybridization signals, suggesting amplicons in homogeneously staining regions that were predominant in most primary and metastatic tumors. EGFR amplification, observed as scattered signals reminiscent of amplicons in double minute chromosomes, or coamplification of EGFR with the centromeric regions was observed as a minor population within primary tumors, and found in variety of populations in metastatic tumors. Overexpression of HER-2 and EGFR were observed in only a small fraction of colorectal carcinomas, but were frequently accompanied by gene amplification.

M34 Actin Regulatory Protein Is a Sensitive Diagnostic Marker for Early- and Late-Stage Mammary Carcinomas

PURPOSE

At present, there is no available molecular marker that reliably detects the earliest stages of epithelial transformation in the majority of patients affected with incipient breast carcinoma. Here we introduce M34 protein, a mammalian actin filament regulatory protein, as a highly sensitive and easily detected positive cellular marker for both early and late stages of breast carcinoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this study, 24 human lactation duct neoplasms from postmenopausal women, including fibroadenoma, ductal carcinoma in situ, intraductal lobular papilloma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma, were analyzed for the presence of M34 protein by histochemical staining of paraffin and fresh-frozen sections.

RESULTS

All 24 neoplasias tested positive for M34, whereas none of the 4 normal breast tissues stained for the protein. M34 identification was strongly positive for transformed epithelium in all tumor types tested. Twelve precancerous lesions of fibroadenoma (n = 4), intraductal papilloma (n = 4), and incipient ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 4) all showed high levels of M34 staining, suggesting that precancerous tumors, as well as the earliest stages of mammary carcinoma, can be sensitively detected. Furthermore, anti-M34 antibody selectively stained all 12 advanced-stage metastatic adenocarcinoma cell masses and micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes tested. Single-cell micrometastases embedded in connective tissue or lymph node parenchyma could be clearly resolved by M34 with horseradish peroxidase staining. Lymphocytes, normal ductal endothelium, and vascular endothelial cells were M34-negative, as were muscle, nerve, and adipose tissues. Low-level M34 staining was detected in connective tissue fibroblasts, macrophages, and neutrophils.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, no previously reported markers have shown high sensitivity of detection for both the earliest and most advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Consequently, M34 appears uniquely suited for diagnosis of the earliest stages of lactation duct transformation as well as for advanced-stage mammary carcinoma metastases in surgical margins and axillary lymph nodes.

HER-2 testing and trastuzumab therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

PURPOSE

Trastuzumab therapy has been shown to benefit metastatic breast cancer patients whose tumors exhibit HER-2 protein overexpression or gene amplification. Several tests of varying accuracy and cost are available to identify candidates for trastuzumab. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of alternative HER-2 testing and trastuzumab treatment strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a decision analysis using a state-transition model to simulate clinical practice in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old metastatic breast cancer patients. Outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Interventions included testing with the HercepTest (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) immunohistochemical assay alone, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) alone, and both tests, followed by trastuzumab and chemotherapy for patients with positive test results and chemotherapy alone for patients with negative test results.

RESULTS

In the base case, initial HercepTest with FISH confirmation of all positive results had an ICER of $125,000 per QALY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness of initial FISH was $145,000 per QALY gained. Other strategies yielded the same or poorer effectiveness at a higher cost, or lower effectiveness at a lower cost, but with a less favorable ICER. These findings persisted under a range of assumptions, and only changes in test characteristics substantially altered results.

CONCLUSION

It is more cost-effective to use FISH alone or as confirmation of all positive HercepTest results, rather than using FISH to confirm only weakly positive results or using HercepTest alone. When multiple tests are available to identify treatment candidates, test characteristics may have a substantial impact on the aggregate costs and effectiveness of treatment.

A case of metastatic breast cancer with outgrowth of HER2-negative cells after eradication of HER2-positive cells by humanized Anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab) combined with docetaxel

A 38-year-old woman with cancer of the left breast underwent a modified radical mastectomy with lymph node dissection. Twenty-one months later, massive liver metastases and pleural carcinomatosis occurred. The liver metastases responded completely to chemotherapy with trastuzumab combined with docetaxel, but the pleural carcinomatosis was refractory to the therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that both the primary tumor and the metastatic tumors of the lymph nodes were composed of HER2 amplification-positive and HER2 amplification-negative cancer cells. This analysis also detected a single cell with HER2 amplification in the pleural effusion that was taken at the completion of the chemotherapy, but four follow-up tests showed no amplified cells. It is speculated that in the liver metastases, the trastuzumab was cytotoxic to both HER2-amplified and nonamplified cancer cells and may have acted through its antiangiogenic effect. However, in the pleural effusion, the effect of trastuzumab was more specific to HER2-amplified cells and caused outgrowth of cancer cells lacking expression of HER2 receptors.

Strong HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry often does not predict oncogene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Breast cancer patients with HER-2/neu oncogene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have been shown to have a better response to trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy than those showing HER-2/neu protein overexpression only. Many centers currently perform FISH only on tumors showing 2+ HER-2/neu positivity by immunohistochemistry (IHC), with the assumption that 3+ positivity virtually equates with amplification. Results of FISH performed on 102 breast cancer cases over a 12-month period were correlated with HER-2/neu IHC results. FISH was performed using a ratio of HER-2/neu and chromosome 17 centromere signal counts (PathVysion; Vysis, Downers Grove, IL). Immunohistochemical expression of HER-2/neu was evaluated according to the published scoring guidelines of the HercepTest (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Only 22 of 45 tumors with 3+ positivity (49%) showed amplification by FISH. Only 2 of 25 cases with 2+ staining by IHC (6%) showed gene amplification, and 1 of 25 cases with negative IHC staining (4%) showed weak amplification. Of the 25 cases showing oncogene amplification, 22 (88%) showed 3+ IHC positivity, 2 (8%) showed 2+ positivity, and 1 (4%) was negative by IHC. More than 50% of breast tumors showing strong 3+ HER-2/neu staining do not show oncogene amplification by FISH. Most tumors with 2+ and negative IHC also fail to amplify. In our experience, FISH studies should be performed on all 3+ and 2+ staining tumors to avoid inappropriate and toxic treatment. The decision to perform FISH on IHC-negative tumors should be guided by additional parameters, including tumor grade and estrogen receptor status.

Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in gastric carcinomas

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Epidermal growth factor receptor belongs to the family of type I receptor tyrosine kinases. Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor has been observed in a variety of cancers with or without amplification of the gene. Novel chemotherapies targeting receptor tyrosine kinases might be effective for the treatment of cancers in which overexpression of this protein is a feature. The aim of this study was to assess the potential efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in gastric cancer. This was achieved by determining the frequency of increased epidermal growth factor receptor expression in gastric cancers and investigating the relationship between protein overexpression and gene amplification.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical evaluation of 413 gastric cancers was carried out by using a monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor. The intensity of reactivity was scored by using a 4-tier system (negative, 1+, 2+, and 3+). All positive staining (>1+) tumors overexpressing the protein were then analyzed for gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization by using a gene-specific probe.

RESULTS

High levels of overexpression (2+ or 3+ staining) were found in 9 of 413 (2.2%) patients, whereas low levels of overexpression (1+) were found in 34 (8.2%) of the study cohort. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed that more than 10 copies of the gene were recognized in all 5 cancers with 3+ staining and in 2 of the 4 tumors with 2+ staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a high level of overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor is uncommon in gastric carcinomas, it almost exclusively occurs by gene amplification.

HER-2/neu assessment in primary chemotherapy treated breast carcinoma: no evidence of gene profile changing

HER-2/neu protein expression and gene amplification were analyzed in a series of 85 consecutive breast carcinoma patients entered into an adriamicin/taxol primary chemotherapy trial followed by surgery, 45 of whom underwent pre-treatment fine needle aspirate (FNA). Dual color FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) assay revealed high-level HER-2/neu gene amplification in the immunocytochemistry (ICC) indicated 3+ cases and no, low or moderate amplification in the ICC 2+ group, consistent with previous findings in untreated patients series. Results obtained with the ICC assay CB 11 showed higher overall concordance with FISH than did the Herceptest ICC assay, but CB 11 was less accurate than Herceptest in terms of selecting patients suitable for Herceptin treatment, which is currently restricted to ICC 3+/FISH amplified patients. The only ICC 3+ low-level amplified case (non-amplified according the two more stringent criteria applied) was found with the CB 11 assay. Comparison between pre-treatment smears and post-treatment sections by FISH revealed no significant changes in the HER-2/neu gene profile. In the clinical setting these findings point to the usefulness of HER-2/neu assessment in chemotherapy-treated patients, when pre-treatment material is unavailable.

Evaluation of HER-2/neu oncogene status in breast tumors on tissue microarrays

The amplification and/or overexpression of the HER-2/neu oncogene and its encoded receptor protein are increasingly used for prognostication and prediction of therapeutic response to Herceptin in breast cancer. However, large-scale examination of archival tumor blocks by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is prohibitively laborious and technically challenging. The tissue microarray (TMA) technique enables hundreds of tumors to be studied simultaneously in a single experiment. To evaluate the HER-2/neu status of a selection of the breast tumors in our tumor bank, we constructed a TMA from 97 breast tumors, with a single 0.6-mm core per specimen. HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH was found in 20 of the 87 interpretable cases (23%): in 14 of 14 IHC 3+ cases (100%), 5 of 8 IHC 2+ cases (62.5%) and 1 of 65 IHC 0/1+ cases (1.5%). Three of the 67 cases with no evidence of HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH were moderately positive (2+) by IHC. A close relationship was observed between these 2 assays as applied to the TMA (95.4% concordance: 95% CI, -2.2% to 6.8%; P <0.0001), and both HER-2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression were strongly associated with tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, and progesterone receptor status. Gene amplification was found in most of the tumors with high-level overexpression (IHC 3+) and not in the unequivocal IHC-negative cases. Complementary analysis by IHC and FISH are, however, recommended for tumors graded as 2+ by IHC, the group with the most result discrepancy. Hum Pathol 34:362-368.

Assessment of HER-2/neu overexpression and/or gene amplification in breast carcinomas: should in situ hybridization be the method of choice?

AIMS

Since the release of Herceptin, pathology laboratories have been requested to test breast carcinomas for HER-2/neu overexpression and/or gene amplification. Standardized IHC and FISH are mandatory in order to get reliable results, but there are problems even with standardized procedures. We decided to evaluate the two methods to determine which, or possibly if both, should be the primary investigation method(s).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The material consisted of 215 primary invasive breast carcinomas with complete clinical follow-up of 15 years. HER-2/neu protein expression was determined for all specimens, whereas FISH for assessing HER-2/neu gene signal number was done in 165 cases. IHC was double-checked with two or three different antibodies in 35 tumours, including all cases with discrepancies between IHC and FISH. Among these, there were discrepancies in a third. IHC overexpression of HER-2/neu was found in 13% and gene amplification in 18%. Discordance between IHC and FISH was found in 11 cases (8%). Five tumours were IHC+/FISH- and six were IHC-/FISH+. IHC and FISH positive cases as well as FISH only positive tumours had the same prognosis respecting survival. Tumours with >2 but <or=4 HER-2 gene signals per nucleus had the same survival as cases with >4 gene signals per nucleus. In contrast, cases with IHC overexpression without gene amplification had a prognosis similar to that of IHC-/FISH- tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

From our data, it seems to be more important to assess HER-2/neu gene amplification than IHC overexpression. Failure to detect FISH-amplified (IHC-negative) cases would have an adverse effect on the survival of these patients. On the other hand, IHC overexpression tumours without gene amplification appear to belong to a better prognostic group, and failure to detect them would probably not have a negative effect on the survival of these women. Even though FISH is a more complex and expensive procedure, it should be considered the method of choice for primary assessment of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer patients.

Emerging technologies for HER2 testing

HER2-positive status is the sole criterion for identifying patients with breast cancer for Herceptin therapy, which has known efficacy in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), which measure the HER2 protein and gene, respectively, are currently the most widely used HER2 tests in the clinical setting. However, results from these assays are influenced by many variables including choice of antibody or probe, methodology, level of user experience and interlaboratory variability. Although there is no widespread standard testing algorithm, the importance of HER2 in clinical practice demands accurate and reproducible tests. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and chromogenic in-situ hybridization (CISH) represent upcoming methods for assessing HER2 gene amplification. Enzyme-linked immunosorption assay (ELISA), a semi-automated technique that can be used to measure the level of the HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) in serum, may also prove useful. While such technologies show great promise, they will at least have to be validated against IHC or FISH before being accepted into routine clinical practice.