Diagnosis and management of enteric disease and abdominal catastrophe in peritoneal dialysis patients with peritonitis

Peritoneal Dialysis-associated Peritonitis Due to Streptococcus oralis Three Weeks after Peritoneal Dialysis Initiation

A 60-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to nephrosclerosis had a peritoneal dialysis catheter (PD) embedded with stepwise initiation of peritoneal dialysis using Moncrief and Popovich's technique three months ago. PD was initiated three weeks after creating an exit site. He presented with abdominal pain and fever a day before admission and was diagnosed with PD-associated peritonitis caused by Streptococcus oralis. Medical consultation after admission revealed a history of wisdom tooth extraction following PD catheter placement, resulting in delayed wound healing. Transient bacteremia can occur after tooth extraction, leading to PD-associated peritonitis. Contemplating the oral milieu in patients undergoing PD is pertinent.

Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines 2019 Part 1 (Position paper of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy)

Approximately 10 years have passed since the Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines were formulated in 2009. Much evidence has been reported during the succeeding years, which were not taken into consideration in the previous guidelines, e.g., the next peritoneal dialysis PD trial of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) in Japan, the significance of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), the effects of icodextrin solution, new developments in peritoneal pathology, and a new international recommendation on a proposal for exit-site management. It is essential to incorporate these new developments into the new clinical practice guidelines. Meanwhile, the process of creating such guidelines has changed dramatically worldwide and differs from the process of creating what were “clinical practice guides.” For this revision, we not only conducted systematic reviews using global standard methods but also decided to adopt a two-part structure to create a reference tool, which could be used widely by the society’s members attending a variety of patients. Through a working group consensus, it was decided that Part 1 would present conventional descriptions and Part 2 would pose clinical questions (CQs) in a systematic review format. Thus, Part 1 vastly covers PD that would satisfy the requirements of the members of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT). This article is the duplicated publication from the Japanese version of the guidelines and has been reproduced with permission from the JSDT.

Peritoneal Catheter Removal for Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis Caused by Gram-Negative, Rod-Like Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection During Antibiotic Therapy for Enterococcus faecalis

Peritonitis is a common complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and can result in PD catheter removal, permanent hemodialysis, and, potentially, death. Prediction and prevention of PD-related peritonitis are thus extremely important. In 2016, the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis published guidelines for patients with peritonitis undergoing PD. The guidelines cover most cases of PD-related peritonitis caused by bacteria and include clear indications for catheter removal. However, difficulties often arise when deciding the timing of catheter removal. When multiple enteric organisms are identified in a culture of dialysis effluent, peritonitis may be caused by intra-abdominal pathology, which is associated with substantial mortality. In such cases, catheter removal is considered. In this report, we describe a case in which, during antibiotic therapy for PD-related peritonitis due to Enterococcus faecalis alone, the patient developed a relapse of peritonitis caused by a newly detected Gram-negative, rod-like Pseudomonas aeruginosa. He required catheter removal because of the possibility of peritonitis recurrence. Although additional study is required, early catheter removal may be effective when a new organism is detected during antibiotic therapy for PD-related peritonitis caused by an organism not meeting the definition of refractory peritonitis.

Green dialysate and gallbladder perforation in a peritoneal dialysis patients: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder perforation is a rare but lethal condition and its diagnosis is usually difficult and delayed. Frequently, gallbladder rupture is associated with cholecystitis, but spontaneous perforation was ever described. However, spontaneous rupture of gallbladder has never been reported in patients underwent peritoneal dialysis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 62-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain for 2 days to clinic. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis was diagnosed initially. It was followed by spontaneous gallbladder perforation with greenish dialysate. The patient was managed successfully by antibiotic treatment and primary closure of gallbladder perforation with external drainage. He recovered from this critical condition and stayed on dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention yields a good prognosis in PD patients with gallbladder perforation. Surgical intervention and antibiotic treatment are the mainstay of treatment. Both of them should take place promptly.

Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update. What is new?

The International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) 2010 guidelines on PD-related infections reflect the bulk of knowledge acquired over the last 5 years. It includes new information about causative agents of peritonitis, isolation techniques, or therapeutic regimens. Monitoring of infection rates by reporting of peritonitis and exit site infections, isolated microorganism, and presumed etiology is recommended. Furthermore, special focus is given on careful evaluation of each episode of peritonitis in order to determine the route of infection and to reassess patient's training. In this article, we record the changes in the last ISPD (2010) guidelines compared to the previous ones published in March 2005.

Surgical Peritonitis in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

In this short review we highlight the diagnostic challenge presented by surgical peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients, giving attention to etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. Despite improvements in medical imaging and a reduction in overall rates of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis, the mortality of surgical peritonitis has not changed in recent years and remains a challenge for the clinical team.

Gram-negative peritonitis in children undergoing long-term peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

The proportion of gram-negative causative organisms in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis is increasing. Little published information for this complication exists in children. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical presentation, early and late response to treatment, and identification of factors influencing the outcome of gram-negative peritonitis (GNP) in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

104 children (aged 7.9 +/- 5.9 years) with 121 GNP episodes reported to the International Pediatric Peritonitis Registry from October 2001 through December 2004.

PREDICTORS

Patient, clinical, bacteriological, and treatment features.

OUTCOMES

Initial response to empirical treatment was assessed after approximately 72 hours of therapy. Final outcome was judged according to the occurrence of death, technique failure, relapse, need for catheter exchange, and a composite end point defining full functional recovery.

RESULTS

44% of episodes of GNP occurred in children younger than 5 years. Causative organisms included Pseudomonas species, 21%; Klebsiella species, 18%; Escherichia coli, 17%; and Acinetobacter species, 12%. Thirty-two percent of organisms classified as gram-negative were not identified further. Clinical manifestations were severe and uniform for all causative gram-negative agents. A substantial proportion (20%) of organisms were resistant to ceftazidime, with resulting suboptimal response to empirical therapy. By day 3 of initial empiric treatment, 85% of children with GNP had improved clinically (39%, complete resolution; 46%, improvement in symptoms), 10% showed poor response, and 5% had worsening of symptoms. Multivariate analysis identified severe abdominal pain, use of a single-cuff catheter, and intermittent (versus continuous) intraperitoneal ceftazidime administration as independent predictors of worse initial response to treatment. Full functional recovery was achieved in 86% of episodes. Nineteen patients (16%) required catheter removal, 11 (9%) experienced a relapse, 7 (6%) discontinued peritoneal dialysis therapy permanently, and 3 died. Lack of clinical improvement after 72 hours of therapy (odds ratio, 5.39; P < 0.01) and the presence of an exit-site infection (odds ratio, 7.69; P = 0.01) independently increased the risk of an incomplete functional recovery.

LIMITATIONS

The study was not designed to assess absolute incidence figures or risk factors for the development of GNP in children.

CONCLUSIONS

GNP is a significant complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis therapy in children, and a substantial proportion of affected children are at risk of permanent sequelae. Because results of empiric treatment with ceftazidime are suboptimal in the setting of this infection, alternative antimicrobial agents should be reconsidered.

Alterations of neuropeptides in the human gut during peritonitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrointestinal motility is reduced during sepsis but the pathomechanism involved is poorly understood. We investigated the expression of substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in the myenteric plexus during peritonitis in human small bowel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue samples of the small bowel were gathered from healthy patients and from patients with peritonitis. Immunohistochemistry for myeloperoxidase (MPO), SP, and VIP was performed in whole mount sections. To determine the level of inflammation, MPO-positive cells were counted in the circular muscle layer. SP and VIP immunoreactivity was analyzed in myenteric plexus neurons. The area of positive immunoreactivity for either neuropeptide within the plexus was analyzed and set in relation to the total area of the plexus and consecutively expressed as percentage.

RESULTS

During peritonitis, MPO-positive cells significantly increased by approximately fourfold as compared to healthy tissue. The immunoreactivity for SP was significantly reduced by approximately 80% in myenteric plexus neurons during peritonitis. In contrast, the immunoreactivity for VIP significantly increased by nearly twofold during peritonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

During peritonitis, the inflammatory reaction within the gut is increased. The neuropeptide expression in myenteric plexus neurons was observed as shifting towards increased expression of VIP, known to inhibit intestinal motility, and towards decreased expression of the prokinetic neuropeptide SP.