Mycophenolate mofetil in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a clinical trial with comparison to a historic control group treated with cyclophosphamide

How to Choose the Right Treatment for Membranous Nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy is an autoimmune disease affecting the glomeruli and is one of the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome. In the absence of any therapy, 35% of patients develop end-stage renal disease. The discovery of autoantibodies such as phospholipase A2 receptor 1, antithrombospondin and neural epidermal growth factor-like 1 protein has greatly helped us to understand the pathogenesis and enable the diagnosis of this disease and to guide its treatment. Depending on the complications of nephrotic syndrome, patients with this disease receive supportive treatment with diuretics, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers, lipid-lowering agents and anticoagulants. After assessing the risk of progression of end-stage renal disease, patients receive immunosuppressive therapy with various drugs such as cyclophosphamide, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors or rituximab. Since immunosuppressive drugs can cause life-threatening side effects and up to 30% of patients do not respond to therapy, new therapeutic approaches with drugs such as adrenocorticotropic hormone, belimumab, anti-plasma cell antibodies or complement-guided drugs are currently being tested. However, special attention needs to be paid to the choice of therapy in secondary forms or in specific clinical contexts such as membranous disease in children, pregnant women and patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Primary membranous nephropathy: an endless story

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is an autoimmune disease caused by the attack of autoantibodies against podocyte antigens leading to the in situ production of immune complexes. However, the etiology is unknown and the pathogenesis is still far from being completely elucidated. MN is prevalently idiopathic or primary, but in about 20-30% of cases it is secondary to chronic infections, systemic diseases, exposure to drugs, or malignancy. The differentiation between primary and secondary MN may be difficult, particularly when MN precedes signs and symptoms of the original disease, as in some cases of cancer or systemic lupus erythematosus. The natural course of PMN is variable, but in the long term 40-60% of patients with nephrotic syndrome progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or die from thrombotic or cardiovascular events. PMN is a treatable disease. Patients with asymptomatic proteinuria should receive supportive care. Immunosuppressive treatments should be given to patients with nephrotic syndrome or risk of progression. The most frequently adopted treatments rely on cyclical therapy alternating steroids with a cytotoxic agent every other month, i.e., rituximab at different doses, or calcineurin inhibitors plus low-dose steroids. A good rate of response may be obtained but relapses can occur. Randomized controlled trials, with adequate size, long-term follow-up, and fair definition of endpoints are needed to identify treatment with the best therapeutic index.

Rituximab in patients with membranous nephropathy and kidney insufficiency

Introduction: Patients with membranous nephropathy and kidney insufficiency have an extremely high risk of progression to end-stage renal disease. Whether rituximab can effectively treat membranous nephropathy patients with renal dysfunction remains unknown at present. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab (RTX) in membranous nephropathy with kidney insufficiency.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 35 membranous nephropathy patients with kidney insufficiency administered in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2020 and December 2021. Patients were followed every 1–3 months for a total of 6 months. Clinical data were collected including anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (anti-PLA2R antibody) quantification, 24-h urinary protein, serum albumin, and serum creatinine. The percentage of patients who achieved clinical remission was measured.

Results: There were 7 (20%) patients who achieved complete or partial response at 6 months after RTX treatment. After 6 months of treatment, patients were clinically improved as evidenced by significant improvements in anti- PLA2R antibody titer [7.70 (5.72, 16.72) vs. 59.20 (17.70, 187.50) RU/ml, p < 0.001], 24-h urine protein [7.04 (4.43, 8.90) vs. 10.15 (4.83, 13.57) g/d, p < 0.001], serum albumin [30.55 (24.97, 33.27) vs. 21.40 (16.75, 25.00)g/L, p < 0.001], serum creatinine [99.50 (75.25, 140.25) vs. 152.00 (134.50, 232.50) µmol/L, p = 0.022], and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [78.29 (50.15, 101.55) vs. 41.12 (26.53, 51.41) ml/min/1.73 m², p = 0.045]. There were no significantly differences between responders and nonresponders in the baseline levels of anti-PLA2R antibodies, proteinuria, serum albumin, and renal function. After the RTX treatment, anti-PLA2R antibodies turned negative in all responders, but the antibody level persisted maintained positive in all but 5 nonresponders. The patients who achieved response maintained a stable kidney function during the study period, with eGFR 29.03 (28.76, 35.07) ml/min/1.73 m² before rituximab treatment and 62.73 (62.34, 63.13) ml/min/1.73 m² at the end of follow-up (p = 0.053).

Conclusion: RTX therapy might be an alternative treatment in reducing proteinuria and maintaining stable renal function among membranous nephropathy patients even with kidney insufficiency.

Therapies for Membranous Nephropathy: A Tale From the Old and New Millennia

Primary Membranous Nephropathy (PMN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. If untreated, PMN can lead to end-stage renal disease; moreover, affected patients are at increased risk of complications typical of nephrotic syndrome such as fluid overload, deep vein thrombosis and infection. The association of PMN with HLA-DQA1 and the identification in around 70% of cases of circulating autoantibodies, mainly directed towards the phospholipase A2 receptor, supports the autoimmune nature of the disease. In patients not achieving spontaneous remission or in the ones with deteriorating kidney function and severe nephrotic syndrome, immunosuppression is required to increase the chances of achieving remission. The aim of this review is to discuss the evidence base for the different immunosuppressive regimens used for PMN in studies published so far; the manuscript also includes a section where the authors propose, based upon current evidence, their recommendations regarding immunosuppression in the disease, while highlighting the still significant knowledge gaps and uncertainties.

Revisiting immunological and clinical aspects of membranous nephropathy

Idiopathic or primary membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults and the elderly. It is characterized by a thickening of the wall of the glomerular capillaries due to the presence of immune complex deposits. 85% of membranous nephropathy cases are classified as primary or idiopathic (IMN). The rest are of secondary origin (SMN), caused by autoimmune conditions or malignant tumors as lung cancer, colon and melanomas. It is an organ-specific autoimmune disease in which the complement system plays an important role with the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC; C5b-9), which produces an alteration of the podocyte structure. The antigen responsible for 70-80% of IMN is a podocyte protein called M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). More recently, another podocyte antigen has been identified, the "Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A" (THSD7A), which is responsible for 10% of the cases of negative IMN for anti- PLA2R.

The evolution of the therapeutic approach to membranous nephropathy

Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is a frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. In untreated patients, the outcome is variable, with one-third of the patients entering remission while the remaining ones show persisting proteinuria or progression to end-stage renal disease. Randomized clinical trials reported the efficacy of a 6-month regimen alternating intravenous and oral glucocorticoids with an alkylating agent every other month. The potential side effects of this regimen were limited by the fact that the use of glucocorticoids and alkylating agent did not exceed 3 months each. Two randomized trials with follow-ups (FU) up to 10 years provided assurance about the long-term efficacy and safety of this cyclical therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have also been used successfully. However, in most responders, NS relapsed after the drug was withdrawn. Conflicting results have been reported with mycophenolate salts and adrenocorticotropic hormone. Observational studies reported good results with rituximab (RTX). Two controlled trials demonstrated the superiority of RTX over antiproteinuric therapy alone and cyclosporine. However, the FUs were relatively short and no randomized trial has been published against cyclical therapy. The available results, together with the discovery that most patients with MN have circulating antibodies against the phospholipase A2 receptor 1, support the use of cytotoxic drugs or RTX in MN. It is difficult to choose between these two different treatments. RTX is easier to use, but the FUs of the available studies are short, thus doubts remain about the long-term risk of relapses and the safety of repeated administrations of RTX.

Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy and Treatment Related Complications

Introduction:

Idiopathic Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is an immune-complex mediated renal disease which is usually associated with the nephrotic syndrome (NS). The course of the disease is variable. Some patients maintain normal kidney function with or without a spontaneous remission of proteinuria, while others progress to end-stage renal failure or die from complications related to the nephrotic syndrome. Whether or not to treat a patient with idiopathic membranous nephropathy is still controversial. The controversy is mainly related to the toxicity of the therapy and the variable natural course of the disease-spontaneous remission occurs in 40–50% of patients.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to describe our experience of treatment of an idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN), efficacy and complications rate.

Case report:

Our patient was older, mail gender, in high-risk group with persistent proteinuria 10,68 g/day and stable renal function. We have taken these factors into consideration, along with age and other comorbidities, that may significantly elevate the risk of treatment. We chose to start with early treatment, following the Ponticelli’s group protocol based on high dose corticosteroids (odd months) alternating with clorambucil (even months) for six months. This treatment was accompanied by the steroid side effects, including hyperglycaemia dependance on insulin therapy and pulmonary thromboembolism despite administered prophylactically low molecular weight heparin. The six-month treatment was successfully completed with the reduction of proteinuria to nephritic values 2,86 g/day, despite many complications. Complete remission of the disease with non-significant proteinuria and with stable renal function was achieved in 14 months which has been maintained for 2 years.

Conclusion:

We suggest that decisions on the timing of start of therapy, whom to treat, best sequence of the use of the various immunosuppressive drugs must be based on an individualized assessment of risks and benefits.

The impact of coexisting diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is frequently coexisted with diabetes mellitus (DM). Few researches investigate clinical outcomes in IMN patients coexisting diabetes mellitus (DM), including remission rates, renal survival and complications. Concurrent DM also pose therapeutic challenges to IMN patients due to the influence of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressant on metabolic disorders. We performed this study to investigate the impact of DM on clinical outcomes in IMN and the influence of therapeutic regime on metabolic parameters in diabetic IMN patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and six adult hospitalized patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven IMN were retrospectively studied, including 42 patients coexisted with DM. Clinical outcomes including remission rates, renal outcome and complications were compared between groups. Impact of cyclophosphamide and ciclosporin on metabolism and complications were analyzed in IMN patients coexisting DM.

RESULTS

IMN patients coexisted with DM were presented with advanced age, lower level of eGFR and hemoglobin. Patients coexisted with DM experienced worse renal function deterioration and higher incidence of infection. COX regression analysis showed that DM was an independent risk factor for renal function deterioration in IMN patients. There was no significant difference in remission rates and incidence of venous thromboembolism between two groups. Further exploration on the impact of therapeutic regimens on complications and metabolism showed that cyclophosphamide and ciclosporin had no significant difference in incidence of complications including infection and venous thromboembolism, and posed comparable influences on blood glucose, uric acid and blood lipids in IMN patients coexisted with DM.

CONCLUSION

Coexisting DM was an independent risk factor for renal function deterioration in IMN patients but did not influence the remission of proteinuria. Glucocorticoids in combination with cyclophosphamide or ciclosporine had similar impact on complications and metabolic index including blood glucose, uric acid and blood lipids in IMN patients coexisted with DM.

Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus versus tacrolimus alone for the treatment of idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Tacrolimus (TAC) is effective in treating membranous nephropathy (MN); however relapses are frequent after treatment cessation. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to examine whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to TAC would reduce relapse rate.

Methods

Forty patients with biopsy proven idiopathic MN and nephrotic syndrome were randomly assigned to receive either TAC monotherapy (n = 20) or TAC combined with MMF (n = 20) for 12 months. When patients had been in remission for 1 year on treatment the MMF was stopped and the TAC gradually withdrawn in both groups over 6 months. Patients also received supportive treatment with angiotensin blockade, statins, diuretics and anticoagulation as needed. Primary endpoint was relapse rate following treatment withdrawal. Secondary outcomes were remission rate, time to remission and change in renal function.

Results

16/20 (80%) of patients in the TAC group achieved remission compared to 19/20 (95%) in the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.34). The median time to remission in the TAC group was 54 weeks compared to 40 weeks in the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.46). There was no difference in the relapse rate between the groups: 8/16 (50%) patients in the TAC group relapsed compared to 8/19 (42%) in the TAC/MMF group (p = 0.7). The addition of MMF to TAC did not adversely affect the safety of the treatment.

Conclusions

Addition of MMF to TAC does not alter the relapse rate of nephrotic syndrome in patients with MN.

Trial registration

This trial is registered with EudraCTN2008–001009-41. Trial registration date 2008-10-08.

Primary membranous nephropathy: comprehensive review and historical perspective

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in non-diabetic Caucasian adults over 40 years of age. It has an estimated incidence of 8–10 cases per 1 million. Fifty per cent of patients diagnosed with primary MN continue to have nephrotic syndrome and 30% of patients may progress to end-stage renal disease over 10 years. Although it was recognised as a distinct clinic-pathological entity in 1940s by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy, the pathogenesis and treatment have become more apparent only in the last decade. Discovery of M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies and thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A antibodies has given new perspectives in understanding the pathogenesis of the disease process. Anti-PLA2R antibody is the first serologic marker that has promising evidence to be used as a tool to prognosticate the course of the disease. More importantly, therapeutic agents such as rituximab and adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues are the newer therapeutic options that should be considered in the therapy of primary MN.

Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of Glomerular Diseases: Pitfalls and Pearls

Glucocorticoids exert anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activities by genomic and nongenomic effects. The classic genomic effects are mediated by cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors that can upregulate the expression of anti-inflammatory proteins in the nucleus (transactivation) or repress the translocation of proinflammatory transcription factors from the cytosol into the nucleus (transrepression). The nongenomic effects are probably mediated by membrane glucocorticoid receptors. Glucocorticoid receptors are expressed also in podocytes and experimental data suggest that glucocorticoids may protect from podocyte injury. Glucocorticoids have a low therapeutic index and may exert a number of time-dependent and dose-dependent side effects. Measures to prevent or attenuate side effects include single-morning administration of short-acting glucocorticoids, dietetic counseling, increasing physical activity, frequent monitoring, and adapting the doses to the clinical conditions of the patient. Synthetic glucocorticoids, either given alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs, are still the cornerstone therapy in multiple glomerular disorders. However, glucocorticoids are of little benefit in C3 glomerulopathy and may be potentially deleterious in patients with maladaptive focal glomerulosclerosis. Their efficacy depends not only on the type and severity of glomerular disease, but also on the timeliness of administration, the dosage, and the duration of treatment. Whereas an excessive use of glucocorticoids can be responsible for severe toxicity, too low a dosage and too short duration of glucocorticoid treatment can result in false steroid resistance.

The Effect of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Cyclosporine as Combination Therapy with Low Dose Corticosteroids in High-risk Patients with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: a Multicenter Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Appropriate immunosuppressive therapy for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) remains controversial. The effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus cyclosporine (CsA) combined with low-dose corticosteroids was evaluated in patients with idiopathic MN in a multi-center randomized trial (www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01282073).

METHODS

A total of 39 biopsy-proven idiopathic MN patients with severe proteinuria were randomly assigned to receive MMF combined with low-dose corticosteroids (MMF group) versus CsA combined with low-dose corticosteroids (CsA group), respectively, and followed up for 48 weeks. Complete or partial remission rate of proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 48 weeks were compared.

RESULTS

The level of proteinuria at baseline and at 48 weeks was 8.9 ± 5.9 and 2.1 ± 3.1 g/day, respectively, in the MMF group compared to 8.4 ± 3.5 and 3.2 ± 5.7 g/day, respectively, in the CsA group. In total, 76.1% of the MMF group and 66.7% of the CsA group achieved remission at 48 weeks (95% confidence interval, -0.18 to 0.38). There was no difference in eGFR between the two groups. Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor Ab levels at baseline decreased at 48 weeks in the complete or partial remission group (P = 0.001), but were unchanged in the no-response group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in changes in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores from baseline to 48 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In combination with low-dose corticosteroids, the effect of MMF may not be inferior to that of CsA in patients with idiopathic MN, with similar adverse effects including gastrointestinal symptoms. Trial registry at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01282073).

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a diagnostic and therapeutic quandary!

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria and renal dysfunction is common in diabetic patients and may occur due to variety of causes. Nondiabetic renal diseases (NDRD) account for 30% of the renal biopsies, and idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is a common non diabetic glomerular disease that can exist alone or in combination with diabetic nephropathy (DN). Immunosuppressants used in iMN may be associated with complications of worsening glycemic control and recurrent infections. There is a paucity of literature on the clinical course, outcomes and treatment adverse effects of patients with iMN and diabetes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of all diabetics, evaluated for NDRD and found to have iMN, between January 2000 and June 2015 in our institute.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients with diabetes were biopsied for NDRD and 16 patients had iMN. Mean ± standard deviation age was 54 ± 11.77 years and the median duration of diabetes was 9.4 years. Twelve patients had isolated iMN and four patients had iMN coexisting with DN. Response rates of 18%, 35.71% and 63.63% were seen with Modified Ponticelli (MP) regimen, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), respectively. Five patients developed treatment-related adverse effects significant enough to necessitate a treatment change. Worsening glycemic control was the most common side effect. Adverse effects were less with the MMF compared with the MP regimen and tacrolimus.

CONCLUSION

Patients with iMN coexisting with diabetes exhibit a poor response to the MP regimen. Treatment-related toxicity is less common with MMF in comparison with the MP regimen and tacrolimus-based regimen. An almost similar response was noted with MMF and tacrolimus-based regimen but there was more withdrawal from treatment due to toxicities observed in the latter.

Membranous Nephropathy and Anti-Podocytes Antibodies: Implications for the Diagnostic Workup and Disease Management

The discovery of circulating antibodies specific for native podocyte antigens has transformed the diagnostic workup and greatly improved management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN). In addition, their identification has clearly characterized iMN as a largely autoimmune disorder. Anti-PLA2R1 antibodies are detected in approximately 70% to 80% and anti-THSD7A antibodies in only 2% of adult patients with iMN. The presence of anti-THSD7A antibodies is associated with increased risk of malignancy. The assessment of PLA2R1 and THSD7A antigen expression in glomerular immune deposits has a better sensitivity than measurement of the corresponding autoantibodies. Therefore, in the presence of circulating anti-podocytes autoantibodies and/or enhanced expression of PLA2R1 and THSD7A antigens MN should be considered as primary MN (pMN). Anti-PLA2R1 or anti-THSD7A autoantibodies have been proposed as biomarkers of autoimmune disease activity and their blood levels should be regularly monitored in pMN to evaluate disease activity and predict outcomes. We propose a revised clinical workup flow for patients with MN that recommends assessment of kidney biopsy for PLA2R1 and THSD7A antigen expression, screening for circulating anti-podocytes antibodies, and assessment for secondary causes, especially cancer, in patients with THSD7A antibodies. Persistence of anti-podocyte antibodies for 6 months or their increase in association with nephrotic proteinuria should lead to the introduction of immunosuppressive therapies. Recent data have reported the efficacy and safety of new specific therapies targeting B cells (anti-CD20 antibodies, inhibitors of proteasome) in pMN which should lead to an update of currently outdated treatment guidelines.

Membranous nephropathy: thinking through the therapeutic options

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains the most common cause of the nephrotic syndrome in adults and one of the leading identifiable causes of end-stage kidney disease. Prior to considering the best approach to treatment, three important components need to be considered. First, the natural history of the typical membranous patient today; second, the importance of identifying the causative factors; and third, the integration of the current data on the known autoantibody/antigen systems involved in IMN into the diagnosis and management of the patient. Combining this with information on the known indicators associated with a poor prognosis plus new data on surrogate markers that provide important clues that the treatment plan is correct has provided us with a more secure platform for choosing the right treatment for each patient. This already provides a more rational and precise approach to the use of our current therapeutic options. Even today, we can slow disease progression and in the future new approaches and new therapies are likely to lead to prevention of progression or even reversal of the injury in IMN, thereby leading to improved quality of life of our patients.

Treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: where are we now?

In the last 10 years, basic science and clinical research have made important contributions to the understanding and management of primary membranous nephropathy (MN). The identification of antibodies directed against the M-type phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A protein have added a new perspective on diagnosis, monitoring the immunological activity, predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in patients with primary MN. Mounting evidence suggests that quantification and follow-up of antiPLA2R Abs levels can help in assessing prognosis and evaluate the response to treatment. The kidney disease improving global outcomes guidelines published in 2012 have not been updated. New data on the use of rituximab suggest it should be considered as a potential initial therapy in the treatment of patients with primary MN.

Safety of Rituximab Compared with Steroids and Cyclophosphamide for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy

Guidelines recommend steroid plus cyclical cyclophosphamide (St-Cp) therapy for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy at high risk of progression to ESRD. Rituximab (Rtx) may be a safer alternative. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we compared time to any adverse event (primary outcome); serious or nonserious events; partial and complete remission of the nephrotic syndrome; and a composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death between 100 Rtx-treated patients and 103 patients who received daily St-Cp We monitored patients with standardized protocols and adjusted for baseline characteristics by Cox regression. Over a median follow-up of 40 months, the Rtx group had significantly fewer adverse events than the St-Cp group (63 versus 173; P<0.001), both serious (11 versus 46; P<0.001) and nonserious (52 versus 127; P<0.001). Cumulative incidence of any first (35.5% versus 69.0%; P<0.001), serious (16.4% versus 30.2%; P=0.002), or nonserious (23.6% versus 60.8%; P<0.001) event was significantly lower with Rtx Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) between Rtx and St-Cp groups were 0.27 (0.16 to 0.44) for any first adverse event, 0.32 (0.15 to 0.68) for serious adverse events, and 0.23 (0.13 to 0.41) for nonserious adverse events. Although the cumulative incidence of partial remission was lower in the Rtx group, rates of complete remission and the composite renal end point did not differ significantly between groups. Because of its superior safety profile, we suggest that Rtx might replace St-Cp as first-line immunosuppressive therapy in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome.

Efficacy of leflunomide combined with prednisone in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and clinical efficacy of leflunomide (LEF) and prednisone on refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS).

METHODS

A total of 52 patients with RNS were treated for 24 weeks between 2010 and 2014 in our hospital. In the treated group, 26 patients were treated with LEF and prednisone, and, in the control group, 26 patients were treated with cyclophosphamide (CTX) and prednisone. During the treatment, 24 h urinary protein excretion and the serum levels of albumin and cholesterol, and kidney function were assayed before and after the therapy. Adverse reactions during treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

In the LEF group, the medication was markedly effective in eight cases and effective in nine cases; the total efficacy rate was 65.30%. In the CTX group, the treatment was markedly effective in six cases and effective in nine cases; the total efficacy rate was 57%. There were no significant differences between the results of the total efficacy rate (p > .05). The 24 h urinary protein excretion and serum cholesterol levels in both groups decreased after therapy and the serum levels of albumin in both groups increased after therapy. There were significant differences between the results for the 24 h urinary protein excretion, serum levels of albumin and cholesterol in the two groups (p < .05). The treatments were well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

LEF combined with prednisone has a certain efficacy on the RNS and displays few adverse reactions. A large-sample, randomized double-blind controlled study and long-term follow-up are needed to verify the efficacy of LEF combined with prednisone.

Membranous nephropathy: Pilot study of a novel regimen combining cyclosporine and Rituximab

INTRODUCTION

There is broad consensus that high grade basal proteinuria and failure to achieve remission of proteinuria are key determinants of adverse renal prognosis in patients with primary membranous nephropathy. Based on the fact that current regimens are not ideal due to short and long-term toxicity and propensity to relapse after treatment withdrawal, we developed a treatment protocol based on a novel combination of rituximab and cyclosporine which targets both the B and T cell limbs of the immune system. Herein, we report pilot study data on proteinuria, changes in autoantibody levels and renal function that offer a potentially effective new approach to treatment of severe membranous nephropathy.

METHODS

Thirteen high-risk patients defined by sustained high-grade proteinuria (mean 10.8 g/d) received combination induction therapy with rituximab plus cyclosporine for 6 months, followed by a second cycle of rituximab and tapering of cyclosporine during an 18 month maintenance phase.

RESULTS

Mean proteinuria decreased by 65% at 3 months and by 80% at 6 months. Combined complete or partial remission was achieved in 92% of patients by 9 months; 54% achieved complete remission at 12 months. Two patients relapsed during the trial. All patients with autoantibodies to PLA₂R achieved antibody depletion. Renal function stabilized. The regimen was well tolerated.

DISCUSSION

We report these encouraging preliminary results for their potential value to other investigators needing prospectively collected data to inform the design and power calculations of future randomized clinical trials. Such trials will be needed to formally compare this novel regimen to current therapies for membranous nephropathy.

Management of Membranous Nephropathy in Western Countries

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults in Western countries. In 2012, the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) working group published guidelines for the management of glomerulonephritis, thus providing a template for the treatment of this condition. While being aware of the impact of the clinicians' acumen and that patients may choose a different therapeutic option due to the risks of specific drugs and also of the evolving guidelines, this review details our approach to the management of patients with IMN in a Western center (Toronto).

SUMMARY

Based on studies published in Europe and North America, we included recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with membranous nephropathy similar to our practice population. We highlight the importance of establishing the idiopathic nature of this condition before initiating immunosuppressive therapy, which should include the screening for secondary causes, especially malignancy in the elderly population. The expected outcomes with and without treatment for patients with different risks of progression will be discussed to help guide clinicians in choosing the appropriate course of treatment. The role of conservative therapy as well as of established immunosuppressive treatment, such as the combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone, and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), as well as of newer agents such as rituximab will be reviewed.

KEY MESSAGES

Appropriate assessment is required to exclude secondary conditions causing membranous glomerulonephritis. The role of antibodies to phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R) in establishing the primary disease is growing, though more data are required. The increase in therapeutic options supports treatment individualization, taking into account the availability, benefits and risks, as well as patient preference.

FACTS FROM EAST AND WEST

(1) The prevalence of IMN is increasing worldwide, particularly in elderly patients, and has been reported in 20.0-36.8% of adult-onset NS cases. The presence of anti-PLA2R antibodies in serum or PLA2R on renal biopsy is the most predictive feature for the diagnosis of IMN and is used in both the East and West; however, appropriate screening to rule out secondary causes should still be performed. (2) Several observational (nonrandomized) Asian studies indicate a good response to corticosteroids alone in IMN patients, although no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been done in Asian membranous patients at high risk of progression. Corticosteroid monotherapy has failed in randomized controlled studies in Western countries and is therefore not recommended. (3) Cyclophosphamide is the most commonly prescribed alkylating agent in Europe and China. Also, chlorambucil is still used in some Western countries, particularly in Europe. In North America, CNIs are the more common first-line treatment. (4) Cyclosporine is predominantly used as monotherapy in North America, although KDIGO and Japanese guidelines still recommend a combination with low-dose corticosteroids. Clinical studies both in Asia and Europe showed no or little effects of monotherapy with mycophenolate mofetil compared to standard therapies. (5) There are encouraging data from nonrandomized Western studies for the use of rituximab and a few small studies using adrenocorticotropic hormone. Clinical trials are ongoing in North America to confirm these observations. These drugs are rarely used in Asia. (6) A Chinese study reported that 36% of IMN patients suffered from venous thromboembolism versus 7.3% in a North American study. Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy is usually added to IMN patients with a low risk of bleeding in both Eastern and Western countries. (7) The Chinese traditional medicine herb triptolide, which might have podocyte-protective properties, is used in China to treat IMN. An open-label, multicenter RCT showed that Shenqi, a mixture of 13 herbs, was superior to corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide therapy to restore epidermal growth factor receptor in IMN patients, although proteinuria improvement was equal in the two groups. Importantly, Shenqi treatment induced no severe adverse events while standard therapy did.

Membranous nephropathy: a review on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

In adults, membranous nephropathy (MN) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome. However, the etiology of approximately 75% of MN cases is idiopathic. Secondary causes of MN are autoimmune diseases, infection, drugs, and malignancy. The pathogenesis of MN involves formation of immune complex in subepithelial sites, but the definite mechanism is still unknown. There are three hypotheses about the formation of immune complex, including preformed immune complex, in situ immune-complex formation, and autoantibody against podocyte membrane antigen. The formation of immune complex initiates complement activation, which subsequently leads to glomerular damage. Recently, the antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody was found to be associated with idiopathic MN. This finding may be useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of MN. The current treatment includes best supportive care, which consists of the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, lipid-lowering agents, and optimal control of blood pressure. Immunosuppressive agents should be used for patients who suffer from refractory proteinuria or complications associated with nephrotic syndrome. Existing evidence supports the use of a combination of steroid and alkylating agents. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and the treatment of MN.

Association of anti-PLA₂R antibodies with outcomes after immunosuppressive therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing and duration of immunosuppressive therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) have been debated. This study aimed to evaluate whether measuring the antibody against the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R-ab) at start and end of therapy predicts long-term outcome and therefore may inform this debate.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This observational study included all consecutive high-risk patients with progressive iMN observed from 1997 to 2005 and treated with oral cyclophosphamide (CP) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with corticosteroids for 12 months. Patients were prospectively followed, and outcome was ascertained up to 5 years after completion of immunosuppressive therapy. Serum samples were collected before and after completion of therapy. PLA2R antibodies were determined retrospectively in stored samples using ELISA.

RESULTS

In total, 48 patients (37 men) were included. The median age was 55 years (range, 34-75), and the median serum creatinine level was 1.60 mg/dl (range, 0.98-3.37 mg/dl). Twenty-two patients received MMF and 26 received CP. At baseline, PLA2R-abs were present in 34 patients (71%). Baseline characteristics and outcome did not significantly differ between patients negative or positive for PLA2R-ab. In PLA2R-ab-positive patients, treatment resulted in a rapid decrease of antibodies: median anti-PLA2R-ab, 428 U/ml (range, 41-16,260 U/ml) at baseline and 24 U/ml (range, 0-505 U/ml) after 2 months. The PLA2R-ab levels at baseline did not predict initial response, but antibody status at end of therapy predicted long-term outcome: After 5 years, 14 of 24 (58%) antibody-negative patients were in persistent remission compared with 0 of 9 (0%) antibody-positive patients (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in PLA2R-ab-positive patients, measuring PLA2R-abs at the end of therapy predicts the subsequent course.

Cancer risk after cyclophosphamide treatment in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cyclophosphamide treatment improves renal survival in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. However, use of cyclophosphamide is associated with cancer. The incidence of malignancies in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy was evaluated, and the cancer risk associated with cyclophosphamide use was estimated.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Patients who attended the clinic were included prospectively from 1995 on. A crude incidence ratio for the occurrence of malignancy was calculated. Incidence ratios were subsequently standardized to potential confounders. Latency between cyclophosphamide therapy and the occurrence of cancer was estimated by stratifying for time since the start of treatment. Finally, Poisson regression was used to obtain a multiple adjusted incidence ratio and investigate the dose-response relationship between cyclophosphamide and cancer.

RESULTS

Data were available for 272 patients; the mean age was 51 years, and 70% of the patients were men. Median follow-up was 6.0 years (interquartile range=3.6-9.5), and 127 patients were treated with cyclophosphamide. Cancer incidence was 21.2 per 1000 person-years in treated patients compared with 4.6 per 1000 person-years in patients who did not receive cyclophosphamide, resulting in crude and adjusted incidence ratios of 4.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 18.8) and 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 9.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cyclophosphamide therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy gives a threefold increase in cancer risk. For the average patient, this finding translates into an increase in annual risk from approximately 0.3% to 1.0%. The increased risk of malignancy must be balanced against the improved renal survival.

Glomerular diseases: membranous nephropathy--a modern view

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease usually associated with a nephrotic syndrome and it may progress to ESRD in the long term. Its etiology is often unknown (idiopathic MN), whereas other cases have a recognizable etiology (secondary MN). In idiopathic MN, the glomerular lesions are mainly caused by autoantibodies against a podocyte membrane protein, the M-type of phospholipase A2 receptor 1. The natural course of idiopathic MN is quite varied with spontaneous complete or partial remissions a relatively common occurrence. Patients with asymptomatic non-nephrotic proteinuria seldom progress and need only conservative management. Those with persistent full-blown nephrotic syndrome and those with declining renal function are candidates for specific treatment with any of several regimens. Cyclical therapy with alternating monthly intravenous and oral glucocorticoids combined with a cytotoxic agent can induce remission and preserve renal function in the long term. Cyclosporine or tacrolimus can induce remission, but relapses are frequent after the drug withdrawal. Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy seems to be ineffective, but may be beneficial when administered together with steroids. The experience with adrenocorticotropic hormone, natural or synthetic, is limited to a few studies with short-term follow-up, but high rates of remission can be seen after prolonged treatment. A high rate of remission and good tolerance have also been reported with rituximab. Patients with moderate renal insufficiency may also benefit from treatment, but at a price of frequent and serious side effects. With these limitations in mind, idiopathic MN may be considered a treatable disease in many patients.

Diagnostic tests and treatment options in glomerular disease: 2014 update

Glomerular diseases historically have been challenging disorders to comprehend and treat for patients and physicians alike. Kidney biopsy is the gold standard of diagnosis, but the link between pathophysiology and the histologic representation of kidney injury has remained elusive in many of these diseases. As a result, treatment of glomerular disease usually involves therapies that are not specific to disease pathogenesis, such as blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and various immunosuppression regimens. Recent research has resulted in greater insight into some glomerular diseases, leading to the hope that new diagnostic tests and treatments targeting disease-specific mechanisms are on the horizon. We review recent progress on the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of 4 glomerular diseases: immunoglobulin A nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, the C3 glomerulopathies, and idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Long-term outcomes in idiopathic membranous nephropathy using a restrictive treatment strategy

Recently published Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend limiting the use of immunosuppressive drugs in idiopathic membranous nephropathy to patients at the highest risk of kidney failure. However, recommendations are based on natural history rather than direct assessment of a restrictive treatment strategy. Here, we describe the long-term outcomes of treating a large cohort of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy according to a restrictive treatment policy. We analyzed data for 254 patients who visited our outpatient clinic between 1995 and 2009. All patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers. Immunosuppressive therapy was recommended in cases of deteriorating renal function or untreatable nephrotic syndrome. Primary outcomes for the present study were renal replacement therapy and death. Secondary outcomes included adverse events during follow-up and remission of proteinuria. In total, 124 patients (49%) received immunosuppressive therapy, which predominantly consisted of cyclophosphamide combined with steroids. Ten-year cumulative incidence rates were 3% for renal replacement therapy and 10% for death. Partial remission rates were 39%, 70%, and 83% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively; complete remission rates were 5%, 24%, and 38% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. A serious adverse event occurred in 23% of all patients. The most notable complications were infections (17%), leukopenia (18%), cardiovascular events (13%), and malignancies (8%). In conclusion, the use of a restrictive treatment strategy in this cohort of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy yielded favorable outcomes while limiting the number of patients exposed to toxic drugs. These results support current KDIGO guidelines.

KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis

Glomerulonephritis (GN) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients of all ages throughout the world. Because these disorders are relatively rare, it is difficult to perform randomized clinical trials to define optimal treatment for many of the specific glomerulopathies. In the absence of high-grade evidence to guide the care of glomerular diseases, in June 2012, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) published an international clinical guideline for GN. The Work Group report represents an important review of the literature in this area and offers valid and useful guidelines for the most common situations that arise in the management of patients with glomerular disease. This commentary, developed by a panel of clinical experts convened by the National Kidney Foundation, attempts to put the GN guideline into the context of the US health care system. Overall, we support the vast majority of the recommendations and highlight select areas in which epidemiological factors and medical practice patterns in this country justify modifications and adjustments in order to achieve favorable outcomes. There remain large gaps in our knowledge of the best approaches to treat glomerular disease and we strongly endorse an expanded clinical research effort to improve the health and long-term outcomes of children and adults with GN.

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Immunosuppressive treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is heavily debated. The controversy is mainly related to the toxicity of the therapy and the variable natural course of the disease-spontaneous remission occurs in 40-50% of patients. The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis provides guidance for the treatment of iMN. The guideline suggests that immunosuppressive therapy should be restricted to patients with nephrotic syndrome and persistent proteinuria, deteriorating renal function or severe symptoms. Alkylating agents are the preferred therapy because of their proven efficacy in preventing end-stage renal disease. Calcineurin inhibitors can be used as an alternative although efficacy data on hard renal end points are limited. In this Review, we summarize the KDIGO guideline and address remaining areas of uncertainty. Better risk prediction is needed to identify patients who will benefit from immunosuppressive therapy, and the optimal timing and duration of this therapy is unknown because most of the randomized controlled trials were performed in low-risk or medium-risk patients. Alternative therapies, directed at B cells, are under study. The discovery of anti-M type phospholipase A2 receptor-antibodies is a major breakthrough and we envisage that in the near future, antibody-driven therapy will enable more individualized treatment of patients with iMN.

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Exciting progress recently has been made in our understanding of idiopathic membranous nephropathy, as well as treatment of this disease. Here, we review important advances regarding the pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy. We will also review the current approach to treatment and its limitations and will highlight new therapies that are currently being explored for this disease including Rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and adrenocorticotropic hormone, with an emphasis on results of the most recent clinical trials.

Have we changed the outcome in membranous nephropathy? A propensity study on the role of immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The long-term effect of immunosuppressive therapy (IS) on kidney survival in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MGN) is debated. The introduction of renin angiotensin blockade, rigorous BP control, and the increasing age at presentation of patients with MGN adds further uncertainty. Given these important changes, we sought to determine whether implementation of IS has altered outcome.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 280 incident MGN patients from three distinct 10-year periods starting from 1975.

RESULTS

We found expected changes in treatment regimens but also variations in age, renal function, severity of proteinuria, and BP at presentation over this time. Outcomes did not differ over time if these significant variations in clinical characteristics were not accounted for across the eras. The effect of IS in the 57 patients treated with currently recommended regimens was assessed using propensity adjustment to address selection bias and the effect of newer, conservative therapies. A propensity score estimating the probability of receiving IS permitted the pairing of 39 treated patients with controls with similar high risk of progression of clinical features. Using this approach, IS was associated not only with remissions in proteinuria but also with substantially improved renal survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that patient presenting characteristics and management regimens have changed significantly over time and the natural history of MGN has been altered. A study of propensity-matched patients confirms that current recommendations for IS have improved outcomes in MGN patients at high risk of progression.

Management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) can have a variable natural course. Treatments able to induce remission can improve the long-term prognosis. However, the optimal therapy for IMN remains controversial.

AREA COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We reviewed the historical and current literature from 1979 to 2010 regarding the natural course of IMN and the possible treatments giving special emphasis to randomized controlled trials and to more recent approaches.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain a comprehensive review of the available treatments of IMN. A personal therapeutic algorithm for nephrotic patients with IMN is also provided.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

At least five different treatments showed efficacy in many (but not all) patients with IMN.

Rituximab therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 2-year study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It was postulated that in patients with membranous nephropathy (MN), four weekly doses of Rituximab (RTX) would result in more effective B cell depletion, a higher remission rate, and maintaining the same safety profile compared with patients treated with RTX dosed at 1 g every 2 weeks. This hypothesis was supported by previous pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis showing that RTX levels in the two-dose regimen were 50% lower compared with nonproteinuric patients, which could potentially result in undertreatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Twenty patients with MN and proteinuria >5 g/24 h received RTX (375 mg/m(2) × 4), with re-treatment at 6 months regardless of proteinuria response. PK analysis was conducted simultaneously with immunological analyses of T and B cells to ascertain the effect of RTX on lymphocyte subpopulations.

RESULTS

Baseline proteinuria of 11.9 g/24 h decreased to 4.2 and 2.0 g/24 h at 12 and 24 months, respectively, whereas creatinine clearance increased from 72.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at baseline to 88.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) at 24 months. Of 18 patients who completed 24-month follow-up, 4 are in complete remission, 12 are in partial remission, 1 has a limited response, and 1 patient relapsed. Serum RTX levels were similar to those obtained with two doses of RTX.

CONCLUSIONS

Four doses of RTX resulted in more effective B cell depletion, but proteinuria reduction was similar to RTX at 1 g every 2 weeks. Baseline quantification of lymphocyte subpopulations did not predict response to RTX therapy.

The accumulated experience with the use of mycophenolate mofetil in primary glomerulonephritis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been extended from renal transplantation to the treatment of glomerulonephritis. MMF has been used in patients with steroid- and ciclosporin A (CsA)-dependent or -resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and in patients with deteriorating renal function or adverse reactions to other drugs. MMF has been also used in patients with membranous and IgA nephropathy after failure of other regimens as well as initial treatment.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The rationale of MMF treatment in primary glomerulonephritis is based in its antifibrotic and antiproteinuric effects. The mechanism of action is described; the results of cohort and randomized trials in minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, idiopathic membranous nephropathy and IgA nephropathy are presented along with the adverse reactions profile and the expert opinion.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This is an up-to-date review providing insight on this novel agent that is increasingly used in the therapeutics of primary glomerulonephritis.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Although the results are conflicting, MMF seems to be effective at least in some patients, who do not respond to corticosteroids, ciclosporin or cytotoxic drugs. However, the experience with MMF in primary glomerulonephritis is limited and further research is required in order to establish MMF in the treatment of patients with glomerular disease.

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: management strategies

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy is based on a 'symptomatic' therapy that includes ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and on an 'aetiological' therapy aimed at modulating underlying immunological mechanisms. The role of the latter is still debated given the usually indolent course of disease; furthermore, traditional immunosuppressants would not have an impact on patient and renal survival according to a systematic review of literature. However, up to 40% of untreated patients eventually develop end-stage renal disease and remission of nephrotic syndrome protects patients from related life-threatening complications and is the strongest positive prognostic factor for long-term kidney function. Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy seems to be rational in high-risk patients with nephrotic syndrome or deteriorating renal function. This article outlines a possible role for each 'aetiological' therapy on the basis of available evidence in order to provide some practical recommendations. The first-line therapy is based on a 6-month regimen of alternating corticosteroids and an alkylating agent ('Ponticelli' regimen), whereas oral ciclosporin and intramuscular corticotrophin (adrenocorticotrophic hormone) are alternatives that provide comparable results in terms of remission of proteinuria, with a different adverse effect profile. New drugs are emerging as potential treatments, such as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab. Specific settings, such as chronic renal failure or elderly age, require a careful balance between benefits and toxicity of immunosuppression. The tailor-made use of this repertoire of drugs can provide a tool to achieve remission of proteinuria and modify the natural course of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Controversies in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Optimum treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy is both controversial and challenging. The most extensively studied and frequently used immunosuppressive regimens for this disease comprise alkylating agents plus corticosteroids or ciclosporin. All of these treatment options have inherent problems: they are not effective in all patients, partial-rather than complete-remissions are common, adverse effects are worrisome, and relapses after treatment cessation remain problematic. Alternative immunosuppressive agents have been tested in an effort to overcome these unresolved issues. This paper reviews the available evidence regarding both established and new agents for the treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, with an emphasis on the results of the most recent clinical trials.

An update on the use of mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis and other primary glomerular diseases

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used successfully as an immunosuppressive medication in transplantation for over a decade. Owing to its efficacy and relatively benign adverse effect profile, its use has been investigated in the treatment of several glomerular diseases, as we describe in this Review. Of these, MMF has most extensively been studied in lupus nephritis. Randomized controlled trials have documented the value of MMF in both induction and maintenance therapy for severe lupus nephritis in several different geographic and ethnic populations, and have defined its potential toxicity. In minimal-change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and membranous nephropathy, promising but limited data on MMF treatment exist from small retrospective and prospective studies. Ongoing, larger, prospective trials, such as the NIH trial in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, might clarify the value of MMF in the treatment of this disease. The efficacy of MMF in IgA nephropathy remains unclear, despite several small, controlled trials. Conflicting results might reflect differences in the disease process, differences in MMF metabolism, or varying responses to the immunosuppressive agent in different populations. Only through large, collaborative, controlled trials will the true role of MMF be defined for each glomerular disease.

Remission of proteinuria in primary glomerulonephritis: we know the goal but do we know the price?

Membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and IgA nephropathy are the most commonly recognized types of primary glomerulonephritis that progress to end-stage renal disease. Persistent proteinuria is a major determinant of such progression. Reduction of proteinuria slows progression of renal disease and improves renal survival, but many of the agents used to reduce proteinuria carry a considerable risk of toxicity. The assessment of benefit versus risk of these medications can be further complicated by the temporal disconnect between the onset of benefit and of serious adverse events. In addition, relapses are common in these disorders and there is often a need for retreatment. Such retreatment might lead to repeated and/or prolonged drug exposure and to the oversight or underestimation of the cumulative dose of these agents because of the potentially extended interval between relapses. Consequently, it is very important to constantly review each patient's status and take into account their age, comorbid conditions and cumulative drug exposure when assessing treatment options. The potentially delayed development of adverse events also emphasizes the need for long-term surveillance of patients who receive immunosuppressive treatment for glomerular disease, often well beyond their drug exposure period and even when the treatment has been successful.