Hypertonic saline and desmopressin: a simple strategy for safe correction of severe hyponatremia

Prevalence of hyponatremia among medically hospitalized patients and associated outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte disturbance among hospitalized patients and is linked to increased mortality as well as poor outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

Study the prevalence of hyponatremia among medically admitted patients and the outcomes associated with hyponatremia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Medical ward at tertiary hospital setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included adult (≥18 years) hospitalized patients in general medical wards. Three readings of serum sodium level were taken (initial sodium level, nadir during admission, and before discharge).

SAMPLE SIZE AND BASIS

The sample size of 350 was determined based on a presumed 35% incidence of hyponatremia among hospitalized patients, with a 5% error margin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence of hyponatremia among medically hospitalized patients and association with health outcomes including length of hospital stay, inpatient mortality, 90-days readmission and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

In this study, 736 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 377 (51.2%) had hyponatremia on admission, increasing to 562 (76.35%) during hospitalization. Mild hyponatremia was observed in 49.6% (n=365), moderate in 13.6% (n=100), and severe in 13.2% (n=97). Severe hyponatremia patients were significantly older (P<.01), predominantly female (P=.014), and had lower serum magnesium and albumin levels (P<.01). Hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and diabetes were more prevalent in severe hyponatremia cases (P<.01, P<.01, P=.045, P<.01, respectively). Hospital stays were significantly shorter for patients with normal sodium levels (P<.01). Patients with severe hyponatremia had a shorter time for first hospital readmission (HR=0.80, P<.01 [95% CI; 0.69-0.94]).

CONCLUSION

Hyponatremia was prevalent among medically hospitalized patients and more common among old patients, women, and patients with comorbidities. Hyponatremia was associated with increased length of stay in hospital and increased risk of 90-day re-admission.

LIMITATIONS

Single-centre design and retrospective nature.

Safety and efficacy of proactive versus reactive administration of desmopressin in severe symptomatic hyponatremia: a randomized controlled trial

This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proactive versus reactive desmopressin (DDAVP) strategies in treating severe symptomatic hyponatremia. Conducted from June 20, 2022, to February 20, 2023, it involved 49 patients with serum sodium levels below 125 mmol/L. Patients were assigned to either the proactive group, receiving DDAVP immediately upon diagnosis, or the reactive group, receiving DDAVP only if the serum sodium level tended to be overcorrected. The primary outcome was the incidence of overcorrection. The study revealed no significant difference in the overcorrection incidence between the proactive (16.7%) and reactive (28%) groups (p = 0.54). The change in serum sodium levels at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h were not different, however, at 48 h, the proactive group exhibited a higher but still safe change in serum sodium levels compared to the reactive group (10.3 ± 3.6 mmol/L vs. 7.7 ± 3.6 mmol/L, p = 0.013). Other parameters including time to symptom improvement, total intravenous fluid administered, DDAVP dose, urine volume, hospital stay duration, osmotic demyelination syndrome incidence, and 28-day mortality did not significantly differ between the groups. In conclusion, our findings suggest that there was no significant disparity in overcorrection rates between proactive and reactive DDAVP strategies for treating severe symptomatic hyponatremia. However, further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these results.

[Consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia from the Austrian Society for Nephrology 2024]

Hyponatremia is a disorder of water homeostasis. Water balance is maintained by the collaboration of renal function and cerebral structures, which regulate thirst mechanisms and secretion of the antidiuretic hormone. Measurement of serum-osmolality, urine osmolality and urine-sodium concentration help to diagnose the different reasons for hyponatremia. Hyponatremia induces cerebral edema and might lead to severe neurological symptoms, which need acute therapy. Also, mild forms of hyponatremia should be treated causally, or at least symptomatically. An inadequate fast increase of the serum sodium level should be avoided, because it raises the risk of cerebral osmotic demyelination. Basic pathophysiological knowledge is necessary to identify the different reasons for hyponatremia which need different therapeutic procedures.

Treatment Guidelines for Hyponatremia: Stay the Course

International guidelines designed to minimize the risk of complications that can occur when correcting severe hyponatremia have been widely accepted for a decade. On the basis of the results of a recent large retrospective study of patients hospitalized with hyponatremia, it has been suggested that hyponatremia guidelines have gone too far in limiting the rate of rise of the serum sodium concentration; the need for therapeutic caution and frequent monitoring of the serum sodium concentration has been questioned. These assertions are reminiscent of a controversy that began many years ago. After reviewing the history of that controversy, the evidence supporting the guidelines, and the validity of data challenging them, we conclude that current safeguards should not be abandoned. To do so would be akin to discarding your umbrella because you remained dry in a rainstorm. The authors of this review, who represent 20 medical centers in nine countries, have all contributed significantly to the literature on the subject. We urge clinicians to continue to treat severe hyponatremia cautiously and to wait for better evidence before adopting less stringent therapeutic limits.

Shikimic acid recovers diarrhea and its complications in SD rats fed lactose diet to induce diarrhea

BACKGROUND

Diarrhea is the increase of excretion of human water content and an imbalance in the physiologic processes of the small and large intestine while shikimic acid is an important biochemical metabolite in plants. This study aims to study the anti-diarrheal activity of shikimic acid through restoring kidney function, antioxidant activity, inflammatory markers, sodium/potassium-ATPase activity, apoptosis genes, and histology of the kidney in SD rats fed lactose diet to induce diarrhea.

RESULTS

Thirty-six male SD rats (150 ± 10 g, 12 weeks old) were divided into 2 equal groups (18 rats/group) as follows: normal and diarrheal rats. Normal rats were divided into 3 equal groups of 6 rats each: the control, shikimic acid, and desmopressin drug groups. Diarrheal rats were also divided into 3 equal groups of 6 rats each: diarrheal, diarrheal rats + shikimic acid, and diarrheal rats + desmopressin drug groups. Shikimic acid restored serum urea and creatinine, urinary volume, kidney weight, sodium, potassium, and chloride balance in serum and urine. The acid returned the antioxidant (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, malondialdehyde, NADPH oxidase activity, conjugated dienes, and oxidative index) activity and the inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10) to values approaching the control values. Shikimic acid also restored the sodium/potassium-ATPase activity, the apoptosis genes p53 and bcl-2, and the histology of kidney tissue in diarrheal rats to be near the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Shikimic acid rescues diarrhea and its complications through restoring kidney function, serum and urinary electrolytes, antioxidant activity, inflammatory markers, sodium/potassium-ATPase activity, the apoptosis genes, and the histology of the kidney in diarrheal rats to approach the control one.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies to Severe Hyponatremia in the Intensive Care Unit

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality encountered in critically ill patients and is linked to heightened morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization. However, its causal role in these poor outcomes and the impact of treatment remain unclear. Plasma sodium is the main determinant of plasma tonicity; consequently, hyponatremia commonly indicates hypotonicity but can also occur in conjunction with isotonicity and hypertonicity. Plasma sodium is a function of total body exchangeable sodium and potassium and total body water. Hypotonic hyponatremia arises when total body water is proportionally greater than the sum of total body exchangeable cations, that is, electrolyte-free water excess; the latter is the result of increased intake or decreased (kidney) excretion. Hypotonic hyponatremia leads to water movement into brain cells resulting in cerebral edema. Brain cells adapt by eliminating solutes, a process that is largely completed by 48 h. Clinical manifestations of hyponatremia depend on its biochemical severity and duration. Symptoms of hyponatremia are more pronounced with acute hyponatremia where brain adaptation is incomplete while they are less prominent in chronic hyponatremia. The authors recommend a physiological approach to determine if hyponatremia is hypotonic, if it is mediated by arginine vasopressin, and if arginine vasopressin secretion is physiologically appropriate. The treatment of hyponatremia depends on the presence and severity of symptoms. Brain herniation is a concern when severe symptoms are present, and current guidelines recommend immediate treatment with hypertonic saline. In the absence of significant symptoms, the concern is neurologic sequelae resulting from rapid correction of hyponatremia which is usually the result of a large water diuresis. Some studies have found desmopressin useful to effectively curtail the water diuresis responsible for rapid correction.

Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis: From Pathophysiology to Management

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder, affecting more than 15% of patients in the hospital. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the most frequent cause of hypotonic hyponatremia, mediated by nonosmotic release of arginine vasopressin (AVP, previously known as antidiuretic hormone), which acts on the renal V2 receptors to promote water retention. There are a variety of underlying causes of SIAD, including malignancy, pulmonary pathology, and central nervous system pathology. In clinical practice, the etiology of hyponatremia is frequently multifactorial and the management approach may need to evolve during treatment of a single episode. It is therefore important to regularly reassess clinical status and biochemistry, while remaining alert to potential underlying etiological factors that may become more apparent during the course of treatment. In the absence of severe symptoms requiring urgent intervention, fluid restriction (FR) is widely endorsed as the first-line treatment for SIAD in current guidelines, but there is considerable controversy regarding second-line therapy in instances where FR is unsuccessful, which occurs in around half of cases. We review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and differential diagnosis of SIAD, and summarize recent evidence for therapeutic options beyond FR, with a focus on tolvaptan, urea, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

A Conspectus of Euvolemic Hyponatremia, Its Various Etiologies, and Treatment Modalities: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Hyponatremia is the most prevalent electrolyte imbalance encountered among hospitalized patients, athletes, the elderly, patients with chronic ailments, postoperative patients, and a few asymptomatic individuals. Clinical manifestations of hyponatremia can be diverse, with characteristic neurological symptoms. Depending on in-depth medical history, physical examination (including volume status assessment), laboratory investigation, and drug history, patients can be classified broadly as undergoing hypervolemic, euvolemic, or hypovolemic hyponatremia. However, patients with hypervolemic hyponatremia often present with distinctive signs such as edema or ascites, and the clinical presentation of hypovolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia poses significant challenges for clinicians. The convolution in clinical manifestations of patients is due to the varied etiologies of euvolemic hyponatremia, such as syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), adrenocortical insufficiency, hypothyroidism, psychogenic polydipsia, different classes of drugs (chemotherapeutics, antipsychotics, antidepressants), endurance exercise events, and reset osmostat syndrome (ROS). The management of hyponatremia depends on the rate of hyponatremia onset, duration, severity of symptoms, levels of serum sodium, and underlying comorbidities. Over the last decade, the clinical understanding of hyponatremia has been scattered due to the introduction of innovative laboratory markers and new drugs. This article will be a conspectus of all the recent advancements in the field of diagnosis, investigations, management, and associations of hyponatremia, along with traditional clinical practices. Subsequently, a holistic overview has been laid out for the clinicians to better understand and identify knowledge deficiencies on this topic.

Hypertonic Saline Infusion for Hyponatremia: Limitations of the Adrogué-Madias and Other Formulas

Hypertonic saline infusion is used to correct hyponatremia with severe symptoms. The selection of the volume of infused hypertonic saline ( VInf ) should address prevention of overcorrection or undercorrection. Several formulas computing this VInf have been proposed. The limitations common to these formulas consist of (1) failure to include potential determinants of change in serum sodium concentration ([ Na ]) including exchanges between osmotically active and inactive sodium compartments, changes in hydrogen binding of body water to hydrophilic compounds, and genetic influences and (2) inaccurate estimates of baseline body water entered in any formula and of gains or losses of water, sodium, and potassium during treatment entered in formulas that account for such gains or losses. In addition, computing VInf from the Adrogué-Madias formula by a calculation assuming a linear relation between VInf and increase in [ Na ] is a source of errors because the relation between these two variables was proven to be curvilinear. However, these errors were shown to be negligible by a comparison of estimates of VInf by the Adrogué-Madias formula and by a formula using the same determinants of the change in [ Na ] and the curvilinear relation between this change and VInf . Regardless of the method used to correct hyponatremia, monitoring [ Na ] and changes in external balances of water, sodium, and potassium during treatment remain imperative.

Hyponatremia Demystified: Integrating Physiology to Shape Clinical Practice

Hyponatremia is one of the most common problems encountered in clinical practice and one of the least-understood because accurate diagnosis and management require some familiarity with water homeostasis physiology, making the topic seemingly complex. The prevalence of hyponatremia depends on the nature of the population studied and the criteria used to define it. Hyponatremia is associated with poor outcomes including increased mortality and morbidity. The pathogenesis of hypotonic hyponatremia involves the accumulation of electrolyte-free water caused by either increased intake and/or decrease in kidney excretion. Plasma osmolality, urine osmolality, and urine sodium can help to differentiate among the different etiologies. Brain adaptation to plasma hypotonicity consisting of solute extrusion to mitigate further water influx into brain cells best explains the clinical manifestations of hyponatremia. Acute hyponatremia has an onset within 48 hours, commonly resulting in severe symptoms, while chronic hyponatremia develops over 48 hours and usually is pauci-symptomatic. However, the latter increases the risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome if hyponatremia is corrected rapidly; therefore, extreme caution must be exercised when correcting plasma sodium. Management strategies depend on the presence of symptoms and the cause of hyponatremia and are discussed in this review.

Clinical Approach to Euvolemic Hyponatremia

Euvolemic hyponatremia is frequently encountered in hospitalized patients and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is the most common cause in most patients. SIADH diagnosis is confirmed by decreased serum osmolality, inappropriately elevated urine osmolality (>100 mosmol/L), and elevated urine sodium (Na) levels. Patients should be screened for thiazide use and adrenal or thyroid dysfunction should be ruled out before making a diagnosis of SIADH. Clinical mimics of SIADH like cerebral salt wasting and reset osmostat should be considered in some patients. The distinction between acute (<48 hours) versus chronic (>48 hours or without baseline labs) hyponatremia and clinical symptomatology are important to initiate proper therapy. Acute hyponatremia is a medical emergency and osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) occurs commonly when rapidly correcting any chronic hyponatremia. Hypertonic (3%) saline should be used in patients with significant neurologic symptoms and maximal correction of serum Na level should be limited to <8 mEq over 24 hours to prevent the ODS. Simultaneous administration of parenteral desmopressin is one of the best ways to prevent overly rapid Na correction in high-risk patients. Free water restriction combined with increased solute intake (e.g., urea) is the most effective therapy to treat patients with SIADH. 0.9% saline acts as a hypertonic solution in patients with hyponatremia and should be avoided in the treatment of SIADH due to rapid fluctuations in serum Na levels. Dual effects of 0.9% saline resulting in rapid correction of serum Na during infusion (inducing ODS) and post-infusion worsening of serum Na levels are described in the article with clinical examples.

An Uncommon Cause of Choreoathetosis

Choreoathetosis is an uncommon presentation in the emergency department setting. The differential diagnosis is broad and includes life-threatening as well as benign causes. Lethal etiologies include metabolic derangements such as hyponatremia as in the case presented here. Hypotonic hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte imbalance and can result from 1 of 2 broad categories of dysregulation: excess free-water intake and solute depletion. Here we describe a case of hypotonic hyponatremia due to a less common route of excess free-water intake. Choreoathetosis as a presenting symptom of hyponatremia is described in case reports. We present a case of a 77-year-old Thai woman who presented to the ED with complaints of weakness, mild headache, confusion, vomiting, and choreoathetoid movements for 1 day. She endorsed chronic, worsening constipation and decreased appetite. She was found to be severely hyponatremic with a serum level of 114 mEq/L requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for emergent electrolyte correction. She denied any diuretic use or excess oral water or alcohol intake. The etiology was unclear until a careful history was taken, whereupon it was revealed that she had been self-administering tap-water enemas excessively for relief of constipation. Choreoathetosis resolved with careful electrolyte correction. A home-administered tap-water enema leading to hyponatremia and choreoathetosis is a subtle presentation that underscores the importance of careful social history-taking, especially when dealing with vague or non-specific symptoms. We review some more common causes of hyponatremia and discuss its initial management.

Evaluation of knowledge and practices about administration and regulations of high alert medications among hospital pharmacists in Pakistan: findings and implications

BACKGROUND

A death of a nine months old child in Pakistan following the rapid administration of potassium chloride raised serious concerns on the awareness of appropriate use of high alert medications (HAMs) among healthcare professionals (HCPs). This study aimed to ascertain HAMs-related knowledge among hospital pharmacists in Pakistan.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study using exponential non-discriminative snowball sampling was conducted among hospital pharmacists in healthcare settings in Punjab, Pakistan. A validated study tool was used to determine knowledge on administration, regulation, and practices related to the HAMs. Barriers to conducting HAMs training in the hospitals were assessed from an open-ended question. All quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 while the content analysis was performed on the qualitative data.

RESULTS

A total of 202 hospital pharmacists were included in the study. The mean knowledge score for HAMs administration and regulation were 5.86 ± 1.89 (95% CI 5.60-6.12) and 7.25 ± 1.70 (95% CI 7.02-7.49), respectively. Approximately half of the respondents (49.5%) achieved scores ≥ 70%, demonstrating sufficient knowledge of HAMs. In the multivariable-adjusted model, increasing age and work experience were found to be the positive predictors of good HAMs knowledge. The mean practice score was 36.42 ± 1.97 (95% CI 34.05-38.77), with 62.4% of pharmacists following good HAMs-related practices. We identified several barriers to conducting HAMs training through qualitative analysis. These barriers included lack of knowledge, poor attitude and behavior of medical and paramedical staff, false beliefs, lack of active support by hospital administration, lack of cooperation between HCPs, lack of opportunities, heavy workload, insufficient human resources, financial constraints, and lack of motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of the hospital pharmacists had unsatisfactory knowledge and practices of HAMs. These findings underscore that training on HAMs should be conducted periodically as a part of hospital-based pharmacy education to maximize drug safety.

Korean Society of Nephrology 2022 recommendations on controversial issues in diagnosis and management of hyponatremia

The Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research, in collaboration with the Korean Society of Nephrology, has published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) document for hyponatremia treatment. The document is based on an extensive evidence-based review of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia with the multidisciplinary participation of representative experts in hyponatremia with methodologist support for guideline development. This CPG consists of 12 recommendations (two for diagnosis, eight for treatment, and two for special situations) based on eight detailed topics and nine key questions. Each recommendation begins with statements graded by the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Each statement is followed by rationale supporting the recommendations. The committee issued conditional recommendations in favor of rapid intermittent bolus administration of hypertonic saline in severe hyponatremia, the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure with hypervolemic hyponatremia, and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis with moderate to severe hyponatremia, the individualization of desmopressin use, and strong recommendation on the administration of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients. We hope that this CPG will provide useful recommendations in practice, with the aim of providing clinical support for shared decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Korean Society of Nephrology 2022 Recommendations on controversial issues in diagnosis and management of hyponatremia

The Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research, in collaboration with the Korean Society of Nephrology, has published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) document for hyponatremia treatment. The document is based on an extensive evidence-based review of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia with the multidisciplinary participation of representative experts in hyponatremia with methodologist support for guideline development. This CPG consists of 12 recommendations (two for diagnosis, eight for treatment, and two for special situations) based on eight detailed topics and nine key questions. Each recommendation begins with statements graded by the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Each statement is followed by rationale supporting the recommendations. The committee issued conditional recommendations in favor of rapid intermittent bolus administration of hypertonic saline in severe hyponatremia, the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure with hypervolemic hyponatremia, and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis with moderate to severe hyponatremia, the individualization of desmopressin use, and strong recommendation on the administration of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients. We hope that this CPG will provide useful recommendations in practice, with the aim of providing clinical support for shared decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Diagnosis and Management of Hyponatremia: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder and it affects approximately 5% of adults and 35% of hospitalized patients. Hyponatremia is defined by a serum sodium level of less than 135 mEq/L and most commonly results from water retention. Even mild hyponatremia is associated with increased hospital stay and mortality.

OBSERVATIONS

Symptoms and signs of hyponatremia range from mild and nonspecific (such as weakness or nausea) to severe and life-threatening (such as seizures or coma). Symptom severity depends on the rapidity of development, duration, and severity of hyponatremia. Mild chronic hyponatremia is associated with cognitive impairment, gait disturbances, and increased rates of falls and fractures. In a prospective study, patients with hyponatremia more frequently reported a history of falling compared with people with normal serum sodium levels (23.8% vs 16.4%, respectively; P < .01) and had a higher rate of new fractures over a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (23.3% vs 17.3%; P < .004). Hyponatremia is a secondary cause of osteoporosis. When evaluating patients, clinicians should categorize them according to their fluid volume status (hypovolemic hyponatremia, euvolemic hyponatremia, or hypervolemic hyponatremia). For most patients, the approach to managing hyponatremia should consist of treating the underlying cause. Urea and vaptans can be effective treatments for the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis and hyponatremia in patients with heart failure, but have adverse effects (eg, poor palatability and gastric intolerance with urea; and overly rapid correction of hyponatremia and increased thirst with vaptans). Severely symptomatic hyponatremia (with signs of somnolence, obtundation, coma, seizures, or cardiorespiratory distress) is a medical emergency. US and European guidelines recommend treating severely symptomatic hyponatremia with bolus hypertonic saline to reverse hyponatremic encephalopathy by increasing the serum sodium level by 4 mEq/L to 6 mEq/L within 1 to 2 hours but by no more than 10 mEq/L (correction limit) within the first 24 hours. This treatment approach exceeds the correction limit in about 4.5% to 28% of people. Overly rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia may cause osmotic demyelination, a rare but severe neurological condition, which can result in parkinsonism, quadriparesis, or even death.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Hyponatremia affects approximately 5% of adults and 35% of patients who are hospitalized. Most patients should be managed by treating their underlying disease and according to whether they have hypovolemic, euvolemic, or hypervolemic hyponatremia. Urea and vaptans can be effective in managing the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis and hyponatremia in patients with heart failure; hypertonic saline is reserved for patients with severely symptomatic hyponatremia.

Hypertonic saline for severe symptomatic hyponatraemia: real-world findings from the UK

Objective

To evaluate 'real-world' safety and efficacy of the European Society of Endocrinology guidelines for the treatment of severe symptomatic hyponatraemia using hypertonic saline (HTS).

Design

Retrospective, observational, cohort study, examining the use of HTS for severe symptomatic hyponatraemia at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals between 2017 and 2020.

Methods

Patients were identified from pharmacy records and demographic, clinical, and treatment data extracted.

Results

Out of 112 patients (females:males = 61:51), the mean age ± s.d. was 66.3± 16.0 years and mean pre-treatment serum sodium ± s.d. was 113.8 ± 6.4 mmol/L. Overall, overcorrection rates at 24 and 48 h (>10 and >18 mmol/L) were 44.9 and 19.6%, respectively, while 19.6% of patients were treated for overcorrection. Above-target rise in sodium (>5 mmol/L) after first and second boluses was noted in 22.6 and 34.6% of patients, respectively. In-hospital and 12-month mortality was 7.1 and 18.7%, respectively, with no cases of osmotic demyelination. The mean venous blood gas (VBG) sodium was 1.9 mmol/L lower than paired serum sodium (n = 36) (113.6 ± 6.6 vs 115.7 ± 7.8 mmol/L).

Conclusion

We report real-world data demonstrating that a significant number of patients overcorrected using current guidelines. Also, several patients had above-target rise in sodium after one bolus of HTS, and sodium measurement should be considered before the second bolus unless ongoing severe symptoms persist. A point of care VBG sodium concentration was useful for this purpose. In addition to careful monitoring, a cautious but anticipatory overcorrection prevention strategy should be considered in the first 24 h.

Hyponatremia management among patients admitted to tertiary hospital: A retrospective evaluation

Objective:

The aim of this study is to compare the adherence to the guidelines in patients presenting with hyponatremia defined as a sodium (Na) level ⩽120 mEq/L, treated with 3% hypertonic saline or normal saline. The comparison included 3% hypertonic saline use, safe serum sodium increases within 24 and 48 h, frequency of hyponatremia-related complications, and length of stay.

Methods:

This retrospective observational study enrolled 122 patients with serum sodium ⩽120 mEq/L admitted to the Internal Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard-Health Affairs (NGHA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2016 to December 2017. The patients were treated with either 3% hypertonic saline or normal saline.

Results:

Of the 122 patients, 105 (83.3%) received normal saline, and 17 (13.5%) received hypertonic saline. In the normal saline group, the mean serum sodium increase at 24 h was lower (6.60 ± 4.75) compared to the hypertonic saline group (9.24 ± 5.04). The length of stay was longer in the normal saline group (10.35 ± 13.90) compared to the hypertonic saline group (4.35 ± 3.39). A small proportion (8.7%) of the normal saline group had a serum sodium increase >12 mg/dL at 24 h compared to 29.4% for the hypertonic saline group, and the difference was statistically significant (p value = 0.013). Almost one-third of the sample (36%) presented with complications, the majority (77.3%, n = 34) had a serum sodium of ⩽115 mg/dL, and 22.7% (n = 10) with a serum sodium of 116–120 mg/dL (p value = 0.041).

Conclusion:

Despite the strong recommendation for 3% hypertonic saline use in severe hyponatremia, many practitioners still use normal saline, even in patients with serum sodium ⩽120 mEq/L. Normal saline showed some efficacy in managing hyponatremia in asymptomatic cases; however, severe cases may have a delayed correction, hyponatremia-related complications, and an extended length of stay.

Sodium and Potassium Dysregulation in the Patient With Cancer

Sodium and potassium disorders are pervasive in patients with cancer. The causes of these abnormalities are wide-ranging, are often primary or second-order consequences of the underlying cancer, and have prognostic implications. The approach to hyponatremia should focus on cancer-related etiologies, such as syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone, to the exclusion of other causes. Hypernatremia in non-iatrogenic forms is generally due to water loss rather than excessive sodium intake. Debilitated or dependent patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to hypernatremia. Hypokalemia can occur in patients with cancer due to gastrointestinal disturbances, resulting from decreased intake or increased losses. Renal losses can occur as a result of excessive mineralocorticoid secretion or therapy-related nephrotoxicity. The approach to hyperkalemia should be informed by historical and laboratory clues, and pseudohyperkalemia is particularly common in patients with hematological cancers. Hyperkalemia can be seen in primary or metastatic disease that interrupts the adrenal axis. It can also develop as a consequence of immunotherapy, which can cause adrenalitis or hypophysitis. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is defined by the development of hyperkalemia and is a medical emergency. Awareness of the electrolyte abnormalities that can befall patients with cancer is vital for its prompt recognition and management.

Edelman Revisited: Concepts, Achievements, and Challenges

The key message from the 1958 Edelman study states that combinations of external gains or losses of sodium, potassium and water leading to an increase of the fraction (total body sodium plus total body potassium) over total body water will raise the serum sodium concentration ([Na]_S), while external gains or losses leading to a decrease in this fraction will lower [Na]_S. A variety of studies have supported this concept and current quantitative methods for correcting dysnatremias, including formulas calculating the volume of saline needed for a change in [Na]_S are based on it. Not accounting for external losses of sodium, potassium and water during treatment and faulty values for body water inserted in the formulas predicting the change in [Na]_S affect the accuracy of these formulas. Newly described factors potentially affecting the change in [Na]_S during treatment of dysnatremias include the following: (a) exchanges during development or correction of dysnatremias between osmotically inactive sodium stored in tissues and osmotically active sodium in solution in body fluids; (b) chemical binding of part of body water to macromolecules which would decrease the amount of body water available for osmotic exchanges; and (c) genetic influences on the determination of sodium concentration in body fluids. The effects of these newer developments on the methods of treatment of dysnatremias are not well-established and will need extensive studying. Currently, monitoring of serum sodium concentration remains a critical step during treatment of dysnatremias.

The management of acute and chronic hyponatraemia

Hyponatraemia is the most common electrolyte abnormality encountered in clinical practice; despite this, the work-up and management of hyponatraemia remain suboptimal and varies among different specialist groups. The majority of data comparing hyponatraemia treatments have been observational, up until recently. The past two years have seen the publication of several randomised control trials investigating hyponatraemia treatments, both for chronic and acute hyponatraemia. In this article, we aim to provide a background to the physiology, cause and impact of hyponatraemia and summarise the most recent data on treatments for acute and chronic hyponatraemia, highlighting their efficacy, tolerability and adverse effects.

Hypertonic Saline for Hyponatremia: Meeting Goals and Avoiding Harm

Hypertonic saline has been used for the treatment of hyponatremia for nearly a century. There is now general consensus that hypertonic saline should be used in patients with hyponatremia associated with moderate or severe symptoms to prevent neurological complications. However, much less agreement exists among experts regarding other aspects of its use. Should hypertonic saline be administered as a bolus injection or continuous infusion? What is the appropriate dose? Is a central venous line necessary? Should desmopressin be used concomitantly and for how long? This article considers these important questions, briefly explores the historical origins of hypertonic saline use for hyponatremia, and reviews recent evidence behind its indications, dosing, administration modality and route, combined use with desmopressin to prevent rapid correction of serum sodium, and other considerations such as the need and degree for fluid restriction. The authors conclude by offering some practical recommendations for the use of hypertonic saline.

Acute and Chronic Hyponatremia

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in clinical practice. Catastrophic complications can occur from severe acute hyponatremia and from inappropriate management of acute and chronic hyponatremia. It is essential to define the hypotonic state associated with hyponatremia in order to plan therapy. Understanding cerebral defense mechanisms to hyponatremia are key factors to its manifestations and classification and subsequently to its management. Hypotonic hyponatremia is differentiated on the basis of urine osmolality, urine electrolytes and volume status and its treatment is decided based on chronicity and the presence or absence of central nervous (CNS) symptoms. Proper knowledge of sodium and water homeostasis is essential in individualizing therapeutic plans and avoid iatrogenic complications while managing this disorder.

Induction of renal tumor necrosis factor-α and other autacoids and the beneficial effects of hypertonic saline in acute decompensated heart failure

Although administration of hypertonic saline (HSS) in combination with diuretics has yielded improved weight loss, preservation of renal function, and reduction in hospitalization time in the clinical setting of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), the mechanisms that underlie these beneficial effects remain unclear and additional studies are needed before this approach can be adopted on a more consistent basis. As high salt conditions stimulate the production of several renal autacoids that exhibit natriuretic effects, renal physiologists can contribute to the understanding of mechanisms by which HSS leads to increased diuresis both as an individual therapy as well as in combination with loop diuretics. For instance, since HSS increases TNF-α production by proximal tubule and thick ascending limb of Henle's loop epithelial cells, this article is aimed at highlighting how the effects of TNF-α produced by these cell types may contribute to the beneficial effects of HSS in patients with ADHF. Although TNF-α produced by infiltrating macrophages and T cells exacerbates and attenuates renal damage, respectively, production of this cytokine within the tubular compartment of the kidney functions as an intrinsic regulator of blood pressure and Na⁺ homeostasis via mechanisms along the nephron related to inhibition of Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl^- cotransporter isoform 2 activity and angiotensinogen expression. Thus, in the clinical setting of ADHF and hyponatremia, induction of TNF-α production along the nephron by administration of HSS may attenuate Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl^- cotransporter isoform 2 activity and angiotensinogen expression as part of a mechanism that prevents excessive Na⁺ reabsorption in the thick ascending limb of Henle's loop, thereby mitigating volume overload.

Evaluation of Desmopressin in Critically Ill Patients with Hyponatremia Requiring 3% Hypertonic Saline

BACKGROUND

Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used for hyponatremia management but has been associated with increases in hospital length of stay and duration of hypertonic saline use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hyponatremia management strategies and their effect on sodium correction in critically ill patients requiring 3% hypertonic saline (3HS).

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included critically ill patients with hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 125 mEq/L) receiving 3HS from May 31 2015, to May 31 2019. Patients were divided into those who received 3HS for hyponatremia management (HTS) and those who received proactive or reactive DDAVP in addition to 3HS (D-HTS). Patients in either group could receive rescue DDAVP. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving goal sodium correction of 5-10 mEq/L 24 h after 3HS initiation.

RESULTS

Goal sodium correction was achieved in 52.5% of patients in HTS compared to 65.6% of patients in D-HTS (p = 0.21). Patients in HTS had a shorter duration of 3HS infusion (p = 0.0022) with no difference in ICU length of stay, free water intake, urine output, or serum sodium increases 12 and 24 h after receiving 3HS. Overcorrection during any 24- or 48 h period was not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients in HTS and D-HTS had similar rates of achieving goal sodium correction at 24 h. A proactive or reactive DDAVP strategy led to an increase in 3HS duration and total amount with no significant difference in rates of overcorrection. Prospective, randomized studies assessing standardized strategies for hyponatremia management and DDAVP administration are warranted.

Association of intranasal desmopressin therapy with overcorrection of severe hyponatremia: A retrospective, propensity score-based, single-center cohort study

PURPOSE

Severe hyponatremia, defined as serum sodium concentration ([sNa]) ≤ 120 mEq/L, requires aggressive treatment to prevent potentially fatal cerebral edema, seizures, and other sequelae, but overcorrection can also result in life-threatening cerebral hemorrhage and demyelination. We compared the safety and efficacy of nasal desmopressin to conventional management for the prevention of [sNa] overcorrection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis compared 47 patients treated with desmopressin to 17 patients treated conventionally at a university hospital ICU in Japan between 2013 and 2018 using propensity score-based approaches. The primary outcome was safe [sNa] correction, defined as a ≤ 8 mEq/L difference between baseline and follow-up [sNa] at any time within 24h of diagnosis.

RESULTS

The 24-h safe correction rate was significantly greater in the desmopressin group than the conventional treatment group (68% [32/47] vs. 41% [7/17], P = 0.039), and dose-response analysis indicated a positive association between cumulative 24-h desmopressin dose and safe correction at 24 h (P = 0.003). Few overcorrections precluded reliable assessment at 48 h. Exacerbation of hyponatremia was comparable in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intranasal desmopressin therapy increased the safe correction of severe hyponatremia. Large prospective trials are warranted to confirm this result.

Hyponatremia in Cirrhosis: An Update

Hyponatremia is frequently seen in patients with ascites secondary to advanced cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Although not apparent in the early stages of cirrhosis, the progression of cirrhosis and portal hypertension leads to splanchnic vasodilation, and this leads to the activation of compensatory mechanisms such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), sympathetic nervous system, and antidiuretic hormone (ADH) to ameliorate low circulatory volume. The net effect is the avid retention of sodium and water to compensate for the low effective circulatory volume, resulting in the development of ascites. These compensatory mechanisms lead to impairment of the kidneys to eliminate solute-free water in decompensated cirrhosis. Nonosmotic secretion of antidiuretic hormone (ADH), also known as arginine vasopressin, further worsens excess water retention and thereby hyponatremia. The management of hyponatremia in this setting is a challenge as conventional therapies for hyponatremia including fluid restriction and correction of hypokalemia are frequently inefficacious. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, complications, and various treatment modalities, including albumin infusion, selective vasopressin receptor antagonists, or hypertonic saline for patients with severe hyponatremia and those awaiting liver transplantation.

How low can you go? Severe hyponatremia with a sodium of 94 mg/dL corrected with proactive strategy

We present a case of severe symptomatic hyponatremia (94 mEq/L) in a male patient who presented with nausea, vomiting, and multiple falls. The patient was found with symptomatic hypo-osmolar hypovolemic hyponatremia secondary to volume loss from vomiting, diuretic use, and consumption of solute-free water. To manage such a severely hyponatremic patient, concomitant 3% hypertonic saline and DDAVP were initiated with successful slow and sustained correction of sodium without complications of osmotic demyelination syndrome.

Criteria for Hyponatremic Overcorrection: Systematic Review and Cohort Study of Emergently Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disturbance amongst hospitalized patients. An overly rapid rate of correction of chronic hyponatremia is believed to increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes including osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). There is disagreement in the literature regarding the definition of hyponatremic overcorrection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all English language studies to identify those that calculated sodium correction rate and classified patients' overcorrection status. We then identified all patients who presented to our hospital's emergency department between 2003 and 2015 with a corrected serum sodium ≤ 116 mmol/L. All methods from the systematic review for sodium correction rate calculation and overcorrection status were applied to this cohort.

RESULTS

We identified 24 studies citing 9 distinct sodium correction rate methods and 14 criteria for overcorrection. Six hundred twenty-four patients presenting with severe hyponatremia (median initial value 113 mMol) were identified. Depending on the method used, the median sodium correction rates in our cohort ranged from 0.271 to 1.13 mmol/L per hour. The proportion of patients classified with overcorrection with the different criteria varied almost 11-fold, ranging from 8.5 to 89.9%.

CONCLUSION

Published methods disagree regarding the calculation of sodium correction rates and the definition of hyponatremic overcorrection. This leads to wide variations in sodium correction rates and the prevalence of overcorrection in patient cohorts. Definitions based on ODS risk are needed.

[Hyponatremia-workflow for intensive care physicians]

Hyponatremia (sodium <135 mmol/l) is the most common electrolyte disorder. Despite identical serum concentrations, clinical symptomatology can vary greatly from mild to life-threatening. Accordingly, individual patients require immediate active treatment, while the majority of (mostly oligosymptomatic) patients should first undergo differentiated diagnosis. The most important element is the assessment of the clinical situation of the patient and never isolated laboratory chemical constellations: "Treat the patient, not the numbers".

Treatment of severe symptomatic hyponatremia

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality seen in the hospital. Severe symptomatic hyponatremia is associated with grave consequences including cerebral edema, brain herniation, seizures, obtundation, coma, and respiratory arrest. However, rapid correction of chronic severe hyponatremia may lead to osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) and even death. Given the serious consequences of severe hyponatremia or its inadvertent overcorrection, it is of paramount importance for the clinician to be aware of the various scenarios in which hyponatremic patients can present and tailor the management strategies accordingly. We present here a case of severe hyponatremia of unknown duration with the presenting plasma sodium level of 95 mmol/L and use it to illustrate the various treatment strategies - proactive, reactive, or rescue therapy - along with the physiological basis to support these approaches.

Derivation and Validation of a Novel Risk Score to Predict Overcorrection of Severe Hyponatremia: The Severe Hyponatremia Overcorrection Risk (SHOR) Score

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Osmotic demyelination syndrome is the most concerning complication of severe hyponatremia, occurring with an overly rapid rate of serum sodium correction. There are limited clinical tools to aid in identifying individuals at high risk of overcorrection with severe hyponatremia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We identified all patients who presented to a tertiary-care hospital emergency department in Ottawa, Canada (catchment area 1.2 million) between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2015, with serum sodium (corrected for glucose levels) <116 mmol/L. Overcorrection was determined using 14 published criteria. Latent class analysis measured the independent association of baseline factors with a consensus overcorrection status on the basis of the 14 criteria, and was summarized as a risk score, which was validated in two cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 623 patients presented with severe hyponatremia (mean initial value 112 mmol/L; SD 3.2). The prevalence of no, unlikely, possible, and definite overcorrection was 72%, 4%, 10%, and 14%, respectively. Overcorrection was independently associated with decreased level of consciousness (2 points), vomiting (2 points), severe hypokalemia (1 point), hypotonic urine (4 points), volume overload (-5 points), chest tumor (-5 points), patient age (-1 point per decade, over 50 years), and initial sodium level (<110 mmol/L: 4 points; 110-111 mmol/L: 2 points; 112-113 mmol/L: 1 point). These points were summed to create the Severe Hyponatremic Overcorrection Risk (SHOR) score, which was significantly associated with overcorrection status (Spearman correlation 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.49) and was discriminating (average dichotomized c-statistic 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.81). The internal (n=119) and external (n=95) validation cohorts had significantly greater use of desmopressin, which was significantly associated with the SHOR score. The SHOR score was significantly associated with overcorrection status in the internal (P<0.001) but not external (P=0.39) validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting with severe hyponatremia, overcorrection was common and predictable using baseline information. Further external validation of the SHOR is required before generalized use.

Use of Desmopressin in Hyponatremia: Foe and Friend

Use of desmopressin (1-deamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin; DDAVP), a synthetic vasopressin receptor agonist, has expanded in recent years. Desmopressin leads to renal water retention, and iatrogenic hyponatremia may result if fluid intake is not appropriately restricted. It is common practice to stop a medication that is causing toxicity, and this advice is promulgated in Micromedex, which suggests withholding desmopressin if hyponatremia occurs. If intravenous saline solution is administered and desmopressin is withheld at the same time, rapid changes in serum sodium levels may result, which puts the patient at risk for demyelinating lesions. In the management of desmopressin-associated hyponatremia with neurologic symptoms, the drug should not be withheld despite the presence of hyponatremia. The medication should be continued while administering intravenous hypertonic saline solution. Desmopressin is also used to minimize water excretion during the correction of hyponatremia during water diuresis. When treating hyponatremia, clinicians should monitor closely to avoid free-water diuresis. To prevent ongoing water losses in urine and overly rapid “autocorrection” of serum sodium level, desmopressin can be given to reduce free-water losses. These treatment recommendations are the authors’ perspective from previously published work and personal clinical experience.

Pharmacological management of hyponatremia

INTRODUCTION

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder with a prevalence of up to 30% in hospitalized patients. Furthermore, it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the efficacy and side effects of the currently available treatment options for hyponatremia and the differences in the pharmacological approach between the European and USA guidelines. Additionally, the authors provide their expert perspectives on current treatment strategies and what they expect from this field in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

Several pharmacological options are available for the treatment of hyponatremia, but data from trials examining and comparing these treatments are missing. Regarding chronic hyponatremia, the role of vaptans should be further analyzed, focusing on comparisons with other active treatments on patient-relevant outcomes and not only on serum sodium concentration. Clinicians should be cautious to an overly rapid increase in serum sodium levels with all available treatment strategies. Finally, it is important to ascertain whether correction of serum sodium levels improves mortality in hyponatremic patients.

Managing hyponatraemia secondary to primary polydipsia: beware too rapid correction of hyponatraemia

We describe three cases of severe hyponatraemia in the setting of primary polydipsia that were managed in our centre in 2016. Despite receiving different solute loads, large volume diuresis and rapid correction of serum sodium occurred in all cases. Given the potentially catastrophic consequence of osmotic demyelination, we highlight the judicious use of desmopressin and hypotonic fluid infusion to mitigate sodium overcorrection in this setting.

Treatment of Severe Hyponatremia

Patients with severe (serum sodium ≤120 mEq/L), symptomatic hyponatremia can develop life-threatening or fatal complications from cerebral edema if treatment is inadequate and permanent neurologic disability from osmotic demyelination if treatment is excessive. Unfortunately, as is true of all electrolyte disturbances, there are no randomized trials to guide the treatment of this challenging disorder. Rather, therapeutic decisions rest on physiologic principles, animal models, observational studies, and single-patient reports. European guidelines and recommendations of an American Expert panel have come to similar conclusions on how much correction of hyponatremia is enough and how much is too much, but there are important differences. We review the evidence supporting these recommendations, identifying areas that rest on relatively solid ground and highlighting areas in greatest need of additional data.

The Role of Desmopressin in the Management of Severe, Hypovolemic Hyponatremia: A Single-Center, Comparative Analysis

Background

The role of desmopressin (DDAVP) to prevent or treat rapid serum sodium concentration ([Na]s) correction during hyponatremia management remains unclear.

Objective

To assess DDAVP use during the first 48 hours of severe, hypovolemic hyponatremia management. The primary study hypothesis was that the use of DDAVP would slow the rate of [Na]s correction compared with those not receiving DDAVP.

Design

A retrospective, observational, comparison study.

Setting

A single, Canadian, tertiary center.

Patients

All admitted patients referred to the nephrology service for severe, hypovolemic hyponatremia ([Na]s < 125 mmol/L) over a 12-month period from November 2015.

Measurements

The primary outcomes measure was the [Na]s after medical management for 48 hours. The length of hospital stay was also measured.

Methods

Patients were grouped based on whether they received DDAVP during the first 48 hours of treatment, and [Na]s correction was compared between groups using linear regression. An exploratory, multivariable, linear regression model was used to adjust for diabetes status, active malignancy, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hypertonic saline administration.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were identified, with baseline mean [Na]s of 112.7 ± 6.6 mmol/L versus 117 ± 4.3mmol/L (P = .06) in those receiving (n = 16) and not receiving DDAVP (n = 12), respectively. The DDAVP group had a more rapid [Na]s correction on the first day compared with those not receiving DDAVP, 7.7 ± 3.8 mmol/L/d versus 5.1 ± 2.0 mmol/L/d (P = .04). On the second day, there was a similar rate of [Na]s correction between groups: 1.3 ± 4.3 mmol/L/d versus 2.6 ± 3.2 mmol/L/d (P = .39), respectively. Overall, there was no difference in [Na]s correction after 48 hours between those who received DDAVP and those who did not: 121.7 ± 7.5 mmol/L versus 124.8 ± 5.7 mmol/L (P = .24). Patients who had experienced an overcorrection were successfully treated with DDAVP (n = 5), so that no patient had an ongoing overcorrection by 48 hours.

Limitations

The limited sample size and lack of randomization preclude definitive conclusion on the additional benefit of DDAVP to standard care.

Conclusion

DDAVP appears to be safe and effective in the management of severe, hypovolemic hyponatremia, associated with similar [Na]s correction to those who did not receive DDAVP after 48 hours, despite an initial more rapid correction. A randomized trial should examine what benefit DDAVP confers in addition to standard care in the management of severe, hypovolemic hyponatremia.

Outcomes in Severe Hyponatremia Treated With and Without Desmopressin

BACKGROUND

Overcorrection of plasma sodium in severe hyponatremia is associated with osmotic demyelination syndrome. Desmopressin (DDAVP) can prevent overcorrection of plasma sodium in hyponatremia. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes in hyponatremia according to DDAVP usage.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study including all admissions to internal medicine with hyponatremia (plasma sodium concentration <123 mEq/L) from 2004 to 2014 at 2 academic hospitals in Toronto, Canada. The primary outcome was safe sodium correction (≤12 mEq/L in any 24-hour and ≤18 mEq/L in any 48-hour period).

RESULTS

We identified 1450 admissions with severe hyponatremia; DDAVP was administered in 254 (17.5%). Although DDAVP reduced the rate of change of plasma sodium, fewer patients in the DDAVP group achieved safe correction (174 of 251 [69.3%] vs 970 of 1164 [83.3%]); this result was driven largely by overcorrection occurring before DDAVP administration in the rescue group. Among patients receiving DDAVP, most received it according to a reactive strategy, whereby DDAVP was given after a change in plasma sodium within correction limits (174 of 254 [68.5%]). Suspected osmotic demyelination syndrome was identified in 4 of 1450 admissions (0.28%). There was lower mortality in the DDAVP group (3.9% vs 9.4%), although this is likely affected by confounding. Length of stay in hospital was longer in those who received DDAVP according to a proactive strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although observational, these data support a reactive strategy for using DDAVP in patients at average risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome, as well as a more stringent plasma sodium correction limit of 8 mEq/L in any 24-hour period for high-risk patients. Further studies are urgently needed on DDAVP use in treating hyponatremia.