Results of ASERTAA, a Randomized Prospective Crossover Pharmacogenetic Study of Immediate-Release Versus Extended-Release Tacrolimus in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients

Evaluation of Effective Half-Life and Its Impact on Time to Steady State for Oral MeltDose Tacrolimus (LCPT) in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

For extended-release drug formulations, effective half-life (t1/2eff) is a relevant pharmacokinetic parameter to inform dosing strategies and time to reach steady state. Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant commonly used for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in transplant patients, is available as both immediate- and extended-release formulations. To the best of our knowledge, the t1/2eff of tacrolimus from these different formulations has not yet been assessed. The objective of this study was to characterize the t1/2eff and terminal half-life (t1/2z) of an extended-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac).

METHODS

A noncompartmental analysis of pharmacokinetic data obtained from a phase 2 study in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving either LCPT or IR-Tac was conducted. Intensive blood sampling was performed on days 1, 7, and 14, and tacrolimus whole blood concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method. T1/2eff was estimated using within-participant accumulation ratios. T1/2z was estimated by linear regression of the terminal phase of the concentration versus time profile.

RESULTS

The median accumulation ratios of LCPT and IR-Tac on day 14 were 3.18 and 2.06, respectively.The median (interquartile range; IQR) t1/2eff for LCPT at day 14 of dosing was 48.4 (37.4-77.9) hours, whereas the t1/2z was 20.3 (17.6-22.9) hours. For IR-Tac, the median (IQR) t1/2eff and t1/2z on day 14 were 12.5 (8.8-23.0) hours and 12.2 (9.2-15.7) hours, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with its prolonged release of tacrolimus, LCPT demonstrated a higher accumulation ratio and a longer t1/2eff compared with IR-Tac. These findings underscore the pharmacokinetic differences between different drug formulations of the same moiety and may help inform dose adjustments for LCPT in kidney transplantation.

Effects of switching from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended-release meltdose tacrolimus on cellular immune response

Background

LCP-Tacro [LCPT], a novel once-daily, extended-release formulation of tacrolimus, has a reduced Cmax with comparable AUC exposure, requiring a ∼30% dose reduction in contrast to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). Once-daily LCPT in de novo kidney transplantation has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to that of IR-Tac with advantages in bioavailability and absorption. The present investigation intends to analyze the effects of conversion from IR-Tac to LCPT on phenotype and function of T-cells and B-cells.

Methods

16 kidney transplant patients treated by triple standard immunosuppression with a stable graft function undergoing a switch from IR-Tac to LCPT were included in this observational prospective study. We measured the main immune cell types and performed an in-depth characterization of B cell, dendritic cells and T cells including regulatory T cells of the patients before, 4 and 8 weeks after IR-Tac to LCPT conversion using multi-parameter fl ow cytometry. Additionally, we analyzed T cells by assessing third-party antigens (Tetanus Diphtheria, TD)-reactive T cells, which could be analyzed by restimulation with tetanus vaccine.

Results

Overall, we found no significant alterations following LCPT conversion for the most immune cell populations with a few cell populations showing transient quantitative increase. Thus, 4 weeks after conversion, more regulatory T cells could be measured in the patients with a significant shift from memory to naïve Tregs. Furthermore, we found a transient B cell expansion 4 weeks after conversion from IR-Tac to LCPT. There were no changes in the percentage of other basic immune cell types and the antigen-reactive T cells were also not altered after changing the medication to LCP-tacrolimus.

Conclusion

Here, we demonstrate first insights into the immune system changes occurred under IR-Tac to LCPT conversion therapy in kidney transplant patients. While phenotypic and functional characteristics of the most immune cell populations did not change, we could observe an a transient expansion of regulatory T cells in peripheral blood following IR-Tac to LCTP conversion, which might additionally contribute to the overall immunosuppressive effect.

Immediate-Release versus Extended-Release Tacrolimus: Comparing Blood Pressure Control in Kidney Transplant Recipients - A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HTN) is a common side effect of tacrolimus (Tac), the first-line antirejection medication for kidney transplant recipients. The impact of immediate-release tacrolimus (Tac IR) dosed twice daily versus extended-release tacrolimus (Tac ER) dosed once daily on long-term blood pressure control in kidney transplant recipients remains understudied. This study aims to compare the use of Tac IR versus Tac ER in kidney transplant recipients and evaluate the effects of the different formulations on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HTN crisis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study at a single institution collected baseline characteristics, time-varying exposure to Tac IR versus Tac ER, SBP, DBP, HTN crisis, and confounders at each posttransplant visit. A marginal structural linear mixed-effects model was employed to analyze the longitudinal blood pressure control in kidney transplant recipients receiving Tac IR and Tac ER.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 654 patients, with mean ages of 52.0 years for Tac IR and 50.3 years for Tac ER. Males constituted 56.7% in Tac IR and 55.0% in Tac ER. Notably, the black population had 2.44 times higher odds of receiving Tac ER after adjusting for the rest of the baseline characteristics. No difference was found between longitudinal SBP (p = 0.386, 95% CI: -1.00, 2.57) or DBP (p = 0.797, 95% CI: -1.38, 1.06).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that posttransplant patients taking Tac ER exhibit no difference in chronic SBP and DBP controls compared to Tac IR.

Assessing the Utility of a Genotype-Guided Tacrolimus Equation in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single Institution Retrospective Study

Tacrolimus metabolism is heavily influenced by the CYP3A5 genotype, which varies widely among African Americans (AA). We aimed to assess the performance of a published genotype-informed tacrolimus dosing model in an independent set of adult AA kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. CYP3A5 genotypes were obtained for all AA KTx recipients (n = 232) from 2010 to 2019 who met inclusion criteria at a single transplant center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Medical record data were used to calculate predicted tacrolimus clearance using the published AA KTx dosing equation and two modified iterations. Observed and model-predicted trough levels were compared at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months post-transplant. The mean prediction error at day 3 post-transplant was 3.05 ng/mL, indicating that the model tended to overpredict the tacrolimus trough. This bias improved over time to 1.36 and 0.78 ng/mL at 3 and 6 months post-transplant, respectively. Mean absolute prediction error-a marker of model precision-improved with time to 2.33 ng/mL at 6 months. Limiting genotype data in the model decreased bias and improved precision. The bias and precision of the published model improved over time and were comparable to studies in previous cohorts. The overprediction observed by the published model may represent overfitting to the initial cohort, possibly limiting generalizability.

Pharmacokinetics of Envarsus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients - phase 1 pilot conversion study

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus is the standard immunosuppressant for pediatric kidney transplants and is routinely administered twice daily (BD-tac). Envarsus (LCP-tac), an extended-release formulation, is approved for adults but not for pediatric patients.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot open-label phase 1 study in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients (age < 18 at the time of study). Our primary objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics (Pk) of LCP-tac versus BD-tac. We conducted two 24-h Pk studies: pre-conversion (BD-tac) and 4 weeks post-conversion to LCP-tac. Patients were followed for 6 months, with the option to continue LCP-tac.

RESULTS

Five patients completed the study, with no returns to BD-tac. Median age was 15 years (range 11-17). LCP-tac exhibited an extended-release profile versus the bimodal profile of BD-tac. Time to maximum concentration was delayed (5 h vs. 1 h), and maximum concentration was lower (9.9 ng/mL vs. 14.4 ng/mL). Tacrolimus area under the curve (24 h) was comparable (141 ± 46.5 ng/mL vs. 164 ± 27.8 ng/mL). No new safety concerns arose. There were no rejection and no difference in eGFR at the study's end (1.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 , range - 1.7 to 2.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Concentration/dose ratio was higher in LCP-tac (1.8 ± 0.64 vs. 0.8 ± 0.39). The final conversion ratio was 0.6 (BD-tac: LCP-tac).

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study confirms the extended-release Pk profile and improved absorption of LCP-tac compared to BD-tac. A larger study is needed to further evaluate the population Pk characteristics in children.

Extended-release tacrolimus dosing and outcomes in pediatric and young adult transplant recipients - A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Published data on LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) in the pediatric population are limited.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study describes LCPT doses needed to reach therapeutic ranges in pediatric and young adult kidney and liver transplant recipients in both de novo usage and conversion from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). Adverse outcomes up to 12 months after LCPT initiation were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-one transplant recipients (30 kidney, 11 liver) were included. The median initial doses of LCPT were 0.034 mg/kg (IQR 0.019) de novo and 0.09 mg/kg (IQR = 0.076) converted. The median doses at first therapeutic level were 0.086 mg/kg (IQR 0.028) de novo and 0.1 mg/kg (IQR 0.066) converted. The median LCPT:IR-Tac conversion ratio initially was 0.7 and 0.75 at therapeutic levels. The rate of AKI per 100 days of exposure to IR-Tac was 0.546 and 0.439 on LCPT. The percentage of patients with rejection was not different before and after conversion (clinical rejection 8.6% [n = 3] vs 11.4% [n = 4], p = .6; biopsy-proven rejection 2.9% [n = 1] vs 11.4% [n = 4], p = .11). One patient had graft loss unrelated to rejection, and the graft was explanted.

CONCLUSION

In this study, pediatric and young adult abdominal transplant recipients had therapeutic tacrolimus levels at LCPT doses below the adult-labeled dose; the conversion ratio from IR-Tac to LCPT at therapeutic level was similar. There were no identified safety concerns in de novo or converted LCPT use in pediatric and young adult patients.

Dosing strategies for de novo once-daily extended release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients based on CYP3A5 genotype

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus extended-release tablets have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in the de novo kidney transplant population. Dosing requi rements often vary for tacrolimus based on several factors including variation in metabolism based on CYP3A5 expression. Patients who express CYP3A5 often require higher dosing of immediate-release tacrolimus, but this has not been established for tacrolimus extended-release tablets in the de novo setting.

AIM

To obtain target trough concentrations of extended-release tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients according to CYP3A5 genotype.

METHODS

Single-arm, prospective, single-center, open-label, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT037 13645). Life cycle pharma tacrolimus (LCPT) orally once daily at a starting dose of 0.13 mg/kg/day based on actual body weight. If weight is more than 120% of ideal body weight, an adjusted body weight was used. LCPT dose was adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 8-10 ng/mL. Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP3A5 genotype was performed at study conclusion.

RESULTS

Mean time to therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentration was longer in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (6 d vs 13.5 d vs 4.5 d; P = 0.025). Mean tacrolimus doses and weight-based doses to achieve therapeutic concentration were higher in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (16 mg vs 16 mg vs 12 mg; P = 0.010) (0.20 mg/kg vs 0.19 mg/kg vs 0.13 mg/kg; P = 0.018). CYP3A5 extensive metabolizers experienced lower mean tacrolimus trough concentrations throughout the study period compared to CYP3A5 intermediate metabolizers and non-expressers (7.98 ng/mL vs 9.18 ng/mL vs 10.78 ng/mL; P = 0 0.008). No differences were identified with regards to kidney graft function at 30-d post-transplant. Serious adverse events were reported for 13 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Expression of CYP3A5 leads to higher starting doses and incremental dosage titration of extended-release tacro limus to achieve target trough concentrations. We suggest a higher starting dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d for CYP3A5 expressers.

Comparison of a novel tablet formulation of tacrolimus and conventional capsule formulation in de novo kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The work aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and other outcomes reported in observational studies in de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) receiving novel once-daily extended-release tablet tacrolimus (LCPT; LCP-tacrolimus; Envarsus XR) or receiving standard-of-care capsule tacrolimus (PR-Tac; prolonged-release tacrolimus; Advagraf/IR-Tac; immediate-release tacrolimus; Prograf). Methods: A systematic review was conducted for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies investigating the outcomes in KTRs receiving LCPT or PR-Tac/IR-Tac. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, with no language restriction. The registered trials and references listed in relevant studies were also searched. Data were extracted for the PK profile, tacrolimus trough level (TTL), and changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (Scr), biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rate, delayed graft function (DGF) rate, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) rate, tremor rate (TR), death rate (DR), and rate of infection by cytomegalovirus (CMV). This study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023403787). Results: A total of seven eligible articles including 1,428 patients with 712 in the LCPT group versus 716 in the PR-Tac/IR-Tac group were included in this study for evidence synthesis. The baseline characteristics of the LCPT, PR-Tac, and IR-Tac groups were similar. The pooled analysis showed a higher PK profile in the LCPT group, and this result was consistent with those of all the included studies. In addition, no significant difference was observed for other outcomes. Conclusion: Considering heterogeneity between studies and potential bias, care providers should select agents based on patient-specific factors and their clinical experience for the immunosuppressive treatment of de novo KTRs.

CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22 Cluster Polymorphism Effects on LCP-Tac Tacrolimus Exposure: Population Pharmacokinetic Approach

The aim of the study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model and to investigate the influence of CYP3A5/CYP3A4 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the Tacrolimus PK parameters after LCP-Tac formulation in stable adult renal transplant patients. The model was developed, using NONMEM v7.5, from full PK profiles from a clinical study (n = 30) and trough concentrations (C0) from patient follow-up (n = 68). The PK profile of the LCP-Tac formulation was best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination, parameterized in elimination (CL/F) and distributional (CLD/F) clearances and central compartment (Vc/F) and peripheral compartment (Vp/F) distribution volumes. A time-lagged first-order absorption process was characterized using transit compartment models. According to the structural part of the base model, the LCP-Tac showed an absorption profile characterized by two transit compartments and a mean transit time of 3.02 h. Inter-individual variability was associated with CL/F, Vc/F, and Vp/F. Adding inter-occasion variability (IOV) on CL/F caused a statistically significant reduction in the model minimum objective function MOFV (p < 0.001). Genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5 and a cluster of CYP3A4/A5 SNPs statistically significantly influenced Tac CL/F. In conclusion, a PopPK model was successfully developed for LCP-Tac formulation in stable renal transplant patients. CYP3A4/A5 SNPs as a combined cluster including three different phenotypes (high, intermediate, and poor metabolizers) was the most powerful covariate to describe part of the inter-individual variability associated with apparent elimination clearance. Considering this covariate in the initial dose estimation and during the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) would probably optimize Tac exposure attainments.

Area under the curve of tacrolimus using microsampling devices: towards precision medicine in solid organ transplantation?

PURPOSE

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using trough concentration (Cmin) is mandatory to ensure drug efficacy and safety in solid organ transplantation. However, Cmin is just a proxy for the area under the curve of drug concentrations (AUC) which is the best pharmacokinetic parameter for exposure evaluation. Some studies suggest that patients may present discrepancies between these two parameters. AUC is now easily available through mini-invasive microsampling approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between AUC and Cmin in patients benefiting from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach.

METHODS

Fifty-one transplant recipients benefited from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach, and their 24-h AUC were calculated using the trapezoidal method. The correlation with Cmin was then explored. In parallel, we estimated AUC using the sole Cmin and regression equations according to the post-transplantation days and the galenic form.

RESULTS

Weak correlations were found between 24-h AUC observed and the corresponding Cmin (R2 = 0.60) and between AUC observed and expected using the sole Cmin (R2 = 0.62). Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using Cmin leads to over- or under-estimate drug exposure in 40.3% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus Cmin appears to be an imperfect reflection of drug exposure. Evaluating AUC using a microsampling approach offers a mini-invasive strategy to monitor tacrolimus treatment in transplant recipients.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics are influenced by CYP3A5, age, and concomitant fluconazole in pediatric kidney transplant patients

Tacrolimus, the most common immunosuppressant for organ transplant, has a narrow therapeutic range and is metabolized by CYP3A4/5. Trough concentration monitoring and dosing adjustments are used to reach a therapeutic range. CYP3A5 intermediate and normal metabolizers (*1 allele carriers; IM/NM) demonstrate faster tacrolimus metabolism than poor metabolizers (PM). We analyzed the electronic health records of 93 patients aged <21 years for the first 8 weeks after a kidney transplant between January 2010 and December 2021. The target tacrolimus trough was 10-15 ng/mL in the first 4 weeks and 7-10 ng/mL in the next 4 weeks. Banked DNA was collected and genotyped for CYP3A5*3, *6, *7, and *8 alleles. We found that CYP3A5 IM/NM (n = 21) took longer than PM (n = 72) to reach the therapeutic range (7 vs. 4 days, p = 0.048). IM/NM had more dose adjustments (8 vs. 6, p = 0.025) and needed >150% of the required daily dose compared with PM. The concentration/dose ratio was influenced by age and concomitant fluconazole (p = 0.0003, p = 0.034, respectively) and the average daily dose decreases with age in CYP3A5 PM (p = 0.001). Tremors were more common in patients who ever had a trough concentration >15 ng/mL compared with those who never had a trough concentration >15 ng/mL (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.03-8.98, p = 0.038). Using standard dosing, CYP3A5 IM/NM took longer to reach the goal range and require more dose adjustments and higher doses than PM. Preemptive genotyping could decrease the number of dose changes necessary to reach a therapeutic dose. We have implemented pre-transplant CYP3A5 testing at our institution.

Tacrolimus-why pharmacokinetics matter in the clinic

The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) Tacrolimus (Tac) is the most prescribed immunosuppressant drug after solid organ transplantation. After renal transplantation (RTx) approximately 95% of recipients are discharged with a Tac-based immunosuppressive regime. Despite the high immunosuppressive efficacy, its adverse effects, narrow therapeutic window and high intra- and interpatient variability (IPV) in pharmacokinetics require therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which makes treatment with Tac a major challenge for physicians. The C/D ratio (full blood trough level normalized by daily dose) is able to classify patients receiving Tac into two major metabolism groups, which were significantly associated with the clinical outcomes of patients after renal or liver transplantation. Therefore, the C/D ratio is a simple but effective tool to identify patients at risk of an unfavorable outcome. This review highlights the challenges of Tac-based immunosuppressive therapy faced by transplant physicians in their daily routine, the underlying causes and pharmacokinetics (including genetics, interactions, and differences between available Tac formulations), and the latest data on potential solutions to optimize treatment of high-risk patients.

Impact of CYP3A5 genotype on de-novo LCP tacrolimus dosing and monitoring in kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

LCP tac has a recommended starting dose of 0.14 mg/kg/day in kidney transplant. The goal of this study was to assess the influence of CYP3A5 on perioperative LCP tac dosing and monitoring.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study of adult kidney recipients receiving de-novo LCP tac. CYP3A5 genotype was measured and 90-day pharmacokinetic and clinical were assessed. Patients were classified as CYP3A5 expressors (*1 homozygous or heterozygous) or nonexpressors (LOF *3/*6/*7 allele).

RESULTS

In this study, 120 were screened, 90 were contacted and 52 provided consent; 50 had genotype results, and 22 patients expressed CYP3A5*1. African Americans (AA) comprised 37.5% of nonexpressors versus 81.8% of expressors (P = 0.001). Initial LCP tac dose was similar between CYP3A5 groups (0.145 vs. 0.137 mg/kg/day; P = 0.161), whereas steady state dose was higher in expressors (0.150 vs. 0.117 mg/kg/day; P = 0.026). CYP3A5*1 expressors had significantly more tac trough concentrations of less than 6 ng/ml and significantly fewer tac trough concentrations of more than 14 ng/ml. Providers were significantly more likely to under-adjust LCP tac by 10 and 20% in CYP3A5 expressors versus nonexpressors (P < 0.03). In sequential modeling, CYP3A5 genotype status explained the LCP tac dosing requirements significantly more than AA race.

CONCLUSION

CYP3A5*1 expressors require higher doses of LCP tac to achieve therapeutic concentrations and are at higher risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations, persisting for 30-day posttransplant. LCP tac dose changes in CYP3A5 expressors are more likely to be under-adjusted by providers.

Higher number of tacrolimus dose adjustments in kidney transplant recipients who are extensive and intermediate CYP3A5 metabolizers

Kidney transplant recipients carrying the CYP3A5*1 allele have lower tacrolimus troughs, and higher dose requirements compared to those with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. However, data on the effect of CYP3A5 alleles on post-transplant tacrolimus management are lacking. The effect of CYP3A5 metabolism phenotypes on the number of tacrolimus dose adjustments and troughs in the first 6 months post-transplant was evaluated in 78 recipients (64% Caucasians). Time to first therapeutic concentration, percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also evaluated. Fifty-five kidney transplant recipients were CYP3A5 poor metabolizers (PM), 17 were intermediate metabolizers (IM), and 6 were extensive metabolizers (EM). Compared to PMs, EMs/IMs had significantly more dose adjustments (6.1 vs. 8.1, p = .015). Overall, 33.82% of trough measurements resulted in a dose change. There was no difference in the number of tacrolimus trough measurements between PMs and EM/IMs. The total daily tacrolimus dose requirements were higher in EMs and IMs compared to PMs (<.001). TTR was ∼50% in the PMs and EMs/IMs groups. CYP3A5 EM/IM metabolizers have more tacrolimus dose changes and higher dose requirements which increases clinical management complexity. Larger studies are needed to assess the cost and benefits of including genotyping data to improve clinical management.

Diabetes is a significant and independent predictor for tacrolimus immediate release and LCP-tacrolimus conversion ratios

Diabetes (DM) is a common comorbidity in transplant patients with known effects on gastrointestinal (GI) motility and absorption; however, DM's impact on immediate release (IR) tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus (LCP) conversion ratios has not been studied. This multivariable analysis of a retrospective longitudinal cohort study included kidney transplant recipients converted from IR to LCP between 2019 and 2020. The primary outcome was IR to LCP conversion ratio based on DM status. Other outcomes included tacrolimus variability, rejection, graft loss, and death. Of the 292 patients included, 172 patients had DM and 120 did not. The IR:LCP conversion ratio was significantly higher with DM (67.5% ± 21.1% no DM vs. 79.8% ± 28.7% in DM; P < .001). In multivariable modeling, DM was the only variable significantly and independently associated with IR:LCP conversion ratios. No difference was observed in rejection rates. Graft (97.5% no DM vs. 92.4% in DM; P = .062) and patient survival (100% no DM vs. 94.8% in DM; P = .011) were lower with DM. The presence of DM significantly increased the IR:LCP conversion ratio by 13%-14%, compared to patients without DM. On multivariable analysis, DM was the only significant predictor of conversion ratios, potentially related to GI motility or absorption differences.

Envarsus XR® pharmacokinetics in adolescents post-kidney transplantation - A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Envarsus XR® (LCPT), a once daily dosage formulation of tacrolimus, is an FDA-approved medication in adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). There are limited data on its pharmacokinetics (PK) in adolescent RTRs. We report here the PK profile of LCPT in adolescent RTRs.

METHODS

The dose of LCPT was determined using a dose conversion ratio targeting 0.7 relative to the total daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) dose. On day 7 after converting to LCPT, patients had an abbreviated PK assessment with sampling at: 0 h (pre-dose), 8-, and 12-h post-dose. The PK data analysis was performed using Bayesian estimators. Our results were compared to those of published adult PK data for LCPT and pediatric PK data for IR-Tac and extended release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) formulation (Advagraf).

RESULTS

PK data from three adolescent patients on LCPT were evaluated. The mean (±SD) area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) was 240 (±20.22) h*ng/mL. The mean T_max was 9.01 ± 2.12 h, and the % fluctuation was 77.71 ± 3.96%. The AUC, T_max , and % fluctuation were similar to reported results in adult patients taking LCPT. The AUC was higher and the T_max was longer than what has been reported in pediatric patients taking IR-Tac and ER-Tac. In addition, the LCPT group showed a lower % fluctuation than patients receiving ER-Tac.

CONCLUSION

The PK evaluation of LCPT in adolescent RTRs showed similar results to adults. Adolescents taking LCPT had a higher AUC, a more attenuated T_max , and a lower fluctuation than that seen with ER-Tac in pediatrics.

Combined impact of the inter and intra-patient variability of tacrolimus blood level on allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation

Introduction

Tacrolimus (TAC) has been widely used as an immunosuppressant after kidney transplantation (KT); however, the combined effects of intra-patient variability (IPV) and inter-patient variability of TAC-trough level (C0) in blood remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the combined impact of TAC-IPV and TAC inter-patient variability on allograft outcomes of KT.

Methods

In total, 1,080 immunologically low-risk patients who were not sensitized to donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) were enrolled. TAC-IPV was calculated using the time-weighted coefficient variation (TWCV) of TAC-C0, and values > 30% were classified as high IPV. Concentration-to-dose ratio (CDR) was used for calculating TAC inter-patient variability, and CDR < 1.05 ng•mg/mL was classified as rapid metabolizers (RM). TWCV was calculated based on TAC-C0 up to 1 year after KT, and CDR was calculated based on TAC-C0 up to 3 months after KT. Patients were classified into four groups according to TWCV and CDR: low IPV/non-rapid metabolizer (NRM), high IPV/NRM, low IPV/RM, and high IPV/RM. Subgroup analysis was performed for pre-transplant panel reactive antibody (PRA)-positive and -negative patients (presence or absence of non-donor-specific HLA-antibodies). Allograft outcomes, including deathcensored graft loss (DCGL) and biopsy-proven allograft rejection (BPAR), were compared.

Results

The incidences of DCGL, BPAR, and overall graft loss were the highest in the high-IPV/RM group. In addition, a high IPV/RM was identified as an independent risk factor for DCGL. The hazard ratio of high IPV/RM for DCGL and the incidence of active antibody-mediated rejection were considerably increased in the PRA-positive subgroup.

Discussion

High IPV combined with RM (inter-patient variability) was closely related to adverse allograft outcomes, and hence, more attention must be given to pre-transplant PRA-positive patients.

Use of Pharmacogenetics to Optimize Immunosuppressant Therapy in Kidney-Transplanted Patients

Immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) are routinely used in clinical practice to maintain organ transplant survival. However, these drugs are characterized by a restricted therapeutic index, a high inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability, and a series of severe adverse effects. In particular, genetic factors have been estimated to play a role in this variability because of polymorphisms regarding genes encoding for enzymes and transporters involved in the ISDs pharmacokinetic. Several studies showed important correlations between genetic polymorphisms and ISDs blood levels in transplanted patients; therefore, this review aims to summarize the pharmacogenetics of approved ISDs. We used PubMed database to search papers on pharmacogenetics of ISDs in adults or pediatric patients of any gender and ethnicity receiving immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. We utilized as search term: “cyclosporine or tacrolimus or mycophenolic acid or sirolimus or everolimus and polymorphism and transplant”. Our data showed that polymorphisms in CYP3A5, CYP3A4, ABCB1, and UGT1A9 genes could modify the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants, suggesting that patient genotyping could be a helpful strategy to select the ideal ISDs dose for each patient.

Prolonged-Release Once-Daily Formulation of Tacrolimus Versus Standard-of-Care Tacrolimus in de novo Kidney Transplant Patients Across Europe

Background: Tacrolimus is the calcineurin inhibitor of choice for preventing acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant patients. However, tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic range that requires regular monitoring of blood concentrations to minimize toxicity. A new once-daily tacrolimus formulation, LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT), has been developed, which uses MeltDose™ drug-delivery technology to control drug release and enhance overall bioavailability. Our study compared dosing of LCPT with current standard-of-care tacrolimus [immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-Tac)] during the 6 months following de novo kidney transplantation. Comparisons of graft function, clinical outcomes, safety, and tolerability for LCPT versus IR-Tac/PR-Tac were also performed. Methods: Standard immunological risk patients with end-stage renal disease who had received a de novo kidney transplant were randomized (1:1) to LCPT (N = 200) or IR-Tac/PR-Tac (N = 201). Results: Least squares (LS) mean tacrolimus total daily dose from Week 3 to Month 6 was significantly lower for LCPT than for IR-Tac/PR-Tac. Although LS mean tacrolimus trough levels were significantly higher for LCPT than IR-Tac/PR-Tac, tacrolimus trough levels remained within the standard reference range for most patients. There were no differences between the groups in treatment failure measures or safety profile. Conclusion: LCPT can achieve similar clinical outcomes to other tacrolimus formulations, with a lower daily dose. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02432833.

Improved Kidney Allograft Function after Early Conversion of Fast IR-Tac Metabolizers to LCP-Tac

Fast tacrolimus (Tac) metabolism is associated with a more rapid decline of renal function after renal transplantation (RTx). Because the pharmacokinetics of LCP-Tac (LCPT) and immediate-release Tac (IR-Tac) differ, we hypothesized that switching from IR-Tac to LCPT in kidney transplant recipients would improve the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), particularly in fast metabolizers. For proof of concept, we performed a pilot study including RTx patients who received de novo immunosuppression with IR-Tac. A Tac concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D ratio) < 1.05 ng/mL·1/mg defined fast metabolizers and ≥1.05 ng/mL·1/mg slow metabolizers one month after RTx. Patients were switched to LCPT ≥ 1 month after transplantation and followed for 3 years. Fast metabolizers (n = 58) were switched to LCPT earlier than slow metabolizers (n = 22) after RTx (2.0 (1.0−253.1) vs. 13.2 (1.2−172.8) months, p = 0.005). Twelve months after the conversion to LCPT, Tac doses were reduced by about 65% in both groups. The C/D ratios at 12 months had increased from 0.66 (0.24−2.10) to 1.74 (0.42−5.43) in fast and from 1.15 (0.32−3.60) to 2.75 (1.08−5.90) in slow metabolizers. Fast metabolizers showed noticeable recovery of mean eGFR already one month after the conversion (48.5 ± 17.6 vs. 41.5 ± 17.0 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.032) and at all subsequent time points, whereas the eGFR in slow metabolizers remained stable. Switching to LCPT increased Tac bioavailability, C/D ratio, and was associated with a noticeable recovery of renal function in fast metabolizers. Conversion to LCPT is safe and beneficial early after RTx.

Early Monitoring and Subsequent Gain of Tacrolimus Time-In-Therapeutic Range May Improve Clinical Outcomes After Living Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The early identification of recipients at high risk of graft loss is clinically relevant after kidney transplantation. The authors explored whether the earlier monitoring of tacrolimus (Tac) time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) is predictive of and a subsequent gain in TTR improves transplant outcomes.

METHODS

The TTR within 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was evaluated. Multivariate Cox analyses were performed to explore when TTR was predictive of transplant outcomes. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on incremental TTR change [TTR gain (increase >10%), TTR stable (maintained within 10%), and TTR loss (decrease >10%)] and 4 groups based on predefined cutoff values [low-low (LL), low-high (LH), high-low (HL), and high-high (HH)] using 6- and 12-month TTRs. Death-censored graft loss and patient death were primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Nonlinear associations were observed between 6-, 9-, and 12-month TTR and death-censored graft and patient survival rates. In multivariate analysis, every 10% increase in 6-, 9-, and 12-month TTRs was associated with reduced patient death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.83; HR: 0.68; HR: 0.61, respectively] and graft loss (HR: 0.88; HR: 0.73; HR: 0.66, respectively). A nonlinear relationship was observed between transplant outcomes and incremental changes in TTR. TTR gain and stable TTR contributed to higher graft survival (HR: 0.20; HR: 0.21) and patient survival (HR: 0.14; HR: 0.15) rates than TTR loss, whereas the former 2 had comparable outcomes. Furthermore, compared with those in the HH group, the LL and HL groups had inferior graft survival (HR: 3.33; HR: 5.17) and patient survival (HR: 5.15; HR: 8.94) rates, whereas the LH group had similar outcomes (P = 0.63, P = 0.97). Nonadherence was the main controllable risk factor for low TTR.

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-month TTR identified patients at higher risk of worse outcomes. The subsequent gain of TTR may contribute to better transplant outcomes.

A single-center, open-label, randomized cross-over study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of once-daily prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The narrow therapeutic window of tacrolimus (Tac) requires intense drug monitoring to achieve adequate efficacy while minimizing dose-related toxicities. Once-daily formulations of Tac (LCP-Tac and PR-Tac) have been recently designed for higher bioavailability and a more consistent exposure over time, as opposed to the twice-daily, administered immediate-release formulation of Tac (IR-Tac).

METHODS

This single-center, open-label, randomized cross-over pharmacokinetic (PK) study compares extended-release LCP-Tac with the prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (PR-Tac) in adult de novo liver transplant recipients. Eligible patients were screened and randomized 1:1 to the two treatment arms up to 30 days after liver transplantation. Patients were administered either LCP-Tac or PR-Tac for 14 days followed by another 14-day time interval of the other once-daily Tac medication. A 24hr-PK profile was obtained at the end of each time interval.

RESULTS

Nine patients (45%) completed the study resulting in a total of 18 Tac PK profiles. Overall, the profile of the mean concentrations indicated a flattened kinetic of LCP-Tac compared to PR-Tac, especially in the first 3 h after drug intake. The average cumulative dose per day to achieve equivalent trough levels was approximately 25% lower for LCP-Tac (8.7 mg) than for PR-Tac (11.7 mg). LCP-Tac resulted in a longer tmax and fewer peak-to-trough fluctuations compared to PR-Tac.

CONCLUSION

Despite methodological weaknesses that limit the conclusions, we have found a more consistent drug exposure for LCP-Tac in de novo LT recipients. LCP-Tac demonstrated a greater bioavailability compared to PR-Tac.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Strategies for Envarsus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients Using Population Modelling and Simulations

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus, the cornerstone of transplantation immunosuppression, is a narrow therapeutic index drug with a low and highly variable bioavailability. Therapeutic drug monitoring based on trough level assessment is mandatory in order to target a personalised exposure and avoid both rejection and toxicity. Population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) models might be a useful tool for improving early attainment of target range by guiding initial doses until steady state is reached and trough levels can be reliably used as surrogate marker of exposure. Here we present the first POPPK for predicting the initial doses of the once-daily prolonged release tacrolimus Envarsus (LCPT) in adult kidney recipients.

METHODS

The model was developed exploiting the data from a recent pharmacokinetic randomised clinical study, in which 69 de novo kidney recipients, 33 of whom treated with LCPT, underwent an intensive blood sampling strategy for tacrolimus including four complete pharmacokinetic profiles.

RESULTS

The complex and prolonged absorption of LCPT is well described by the three-phase model that incorporates body weight and CYP3A5 genotype as significant covariates accounting for a great proportion of the inter-patient variability: in particular, CYP3A5*1/*3 expressors had a 66% higher LCPT clearance. We have then generated by simulation a personalised dosing strategy based on the model that could improve the early attainment of therapeutic trough levels by almost doubling the proportion of patients within target range (69.3% compared to 36.1% with the standard body weight-based approach) on post-transplantation day 4 and significantly reduce the proportion of overexposed patients at risk of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

A POPPK model was successfully developed for LCPT in de novo kidney recipients. The model could guide a personalised dosing strategy early after transplantation. For the model to be translated into clinical practice, its beneficial impact of earlier attainment of therapeutic trough levels should be demonstrated on hard clinical outcomes in further studies.

De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial

Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tacrolimus). We compared the efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients. Twenty-five prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 1 year was compared using non-inferiority analysis. LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 20% (90% CI: -40%, -.5%; non-inferiority P = .001). Tacrolimus trough levels peaked at 2-3 months and were higher in LCPT (median 14.5 vs. 12.7 ng/ml; P = .03) with similar dose levels (LCPT vs. IR-tacrolimus: .08 vs. .09 mg/kg/day; P = .33). Cardiovascular-related readmissions were reduced by 62% (P = .046) in LCPT patients. The complication rate per transplant admission and all-cause readmission rate did not differ significantly. These results suggest that LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus with a similar safety profile and improved bioavailability in OHT.

Comparing the pharmacokinetics of extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release formulations in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

One of the most commonly used immunosuppressants in organ transplant, tacrolimus exhibits wide interpatient and intrapatient variability and narrow therapeutic index that necessitates routine concentration monitoring and dosage adjustments. Availability of modified -release tacrolimus products offer once-daily dosing options. The objective of this review is to highlight and compare available pharmacokinetic (PK) data of extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCP-TAC) to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) in kidney transplant recipients.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase search to identify relevant articles evaluating PK data for LCP-TAC compared to IR-TAC in kidney transplant patients including special populations.

EXPERT OPINION

LCP-TAC's unique PK profile may be more favorable than IR-TAC. While the clinical impact of these PK differences have not been established, several outcomes are being evaluated in ongoing studies. Results of these studies will add information incrementally to care for kidney transplant patients. Larger prospective studies evaluating kidney and patient survival differences are needed but it is unlikely that they will be conducted. Given that the patent exclusivity of LCP-TAC for the next several years and imminent loss of exclusivity of PR-TAC, our opinion is the use of LCP-TAC will be increasing, especially in Europe.

Drug-Drug Interaction between Tacrolimus and Vonoprazan in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy are often treated with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to prevent gastric ulcer complications. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a novel PPI possessing different metabolic pathways from conventional PPIs (e.g., omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole). However, no data are available on the change in blood concentration of tacrolimus after switching rabeprazole, a conventional PPI, to vonoprazan coadministration in the initial period of post-transplantation. This is a retrospective study of 18 kidney transplant recipients. The blood concentration and the concentration to dose (C/D) ratio of tacrolimus were compared before and after switching from rabeprazole to vonoprazan. Impacts of CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on the drug-drug interaction were also examined. The median (range) trough concentration of tacrolimus was significantly increased from 5.2 (3.6-7.4) to 8.1 (6.1-11.7) ng/mL (p < 0.0005) after switching from rabeprazole to vonoprazan. The C/D ratio of tacrolimus was also significantly increased from 38.1 (16.5-138.1) to 48.9 (26.2-207.2) (p < 0.0005). The percent changes of tacrolimus concentrations and C/D were 65.8% and 41.8%, respectively. CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms did not affect the change in concentration and C/D ratio of tacrolimus. The present study indicates that vonoprazan coadministration increases the tacrolimus concentration regardless of CYP2C19 or CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms. Thus, frequent monitoring of blood tacrolimus concentration is required when vonoprazan is introduced as an intensive gastric acid blocker in the early phase of post-transplantation.

Evaluating the conversion to extended-release tacrolimus from immediate-release tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A new formulation of once daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-tac, Envarsus XR) was approved for use in the USA for kidney transplant recipients in 2015. There are limited data regarding real-world observations with conversion to LCP-tac in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of liver transplant recipients treated with LCP-tac. Data collection included (1) reasons for switching to LCP-tac; (2) conversion ratio used; (3) kidney function at time of conversion and 3 months after; (4) outcomes of conversion [acute cellular rejection rates and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia] within 3 months of conversion.

RESULTS

Average conversion ratio used to achieve therapeutic drug level without further dose adjustment was 1:0.73 (SD 0.11). Median time after transplant was 508 days (IQR 736). Common reasons patients were switched to LCP-tac were from fluctuations in tacrolimus levels (44%) and adverse effect of tremor (32%). Among patients who were switched due to tremors 88% noted significant improvement. There was no difference in serum creatinine (P = 0.55) or glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.64) from baseline to 3 months postconversion. There were no episodes of acute cellular rejections or CMV viremia postconversion.

CONCLUSION

This observational study demonstrated that conversion of immediate-release tacrolimus to LCP-tac in liver transplant recipients was well tolerated and effective.

Cost-effectiveness of once-daily vs twice-daily tacrolimus among Hispanic and Black kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is a first-line immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection and graft failure in kidney transplant recipients. Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCPT) have been shown to be efficacious, particularly for Hispanic and Black patient subpopulations who are rapid metabolizers, but is more costly than twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LCPT during the first year of treatment vs IR-Tac in kidney transplant recipients who are Hispanic or Black. METHODS: A decision analytic model from a US payer perspective was developed using (1) subgroup outcomes data pooled from two phase 3 clinical trials that compared LCPT and IR-Tac, and (2) direct costs from real-world data sources (ie, costs of LCPT and IR-Tac treatments, biopsy-proven acute rejection, treatment-related serious adverse events [SAEs], graft failure, and consequent dialysis). The primary outcome was cost per successfully treated patient, defined as having a functioning graft after 1 year and without treatment-related SAEs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses established distributions for cost and outcomes estimates, and a series of one-way sensitivity analyses identified parameters that had the most effect on results. RESULTS: Total overall cost for the Hispanic group was $14,765 for LCPT and $12,416 for IR-Tac, and total cost in the Black group was $16,626 for LCPT and $9,871 for IR-Tac. Total overall effectiveness of LCPT and IR-Tac was 88.32% and 84.75% in the Hispanic group and 93.24% and 85.78% in the Black group, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for using LCPT over IR-Tac during the first year of treatment in the Hispanic group was $65,643 per additional successfully treated patient. The ICER for the Black group was $90,458. The single parameter having the most impact on results in both groups was the probability of a treatment-related SAE in IR-Tac, which accounted for 49% of variation in results in the Hispanic group and 46% in the Black group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall results for both groups show that LCPT is incrementally more costly and more effective compared with IR-Tac, indicating a trade-off scenario. LCPT is a cost-effective strategy if a decision makers' willingness to pay for 1 additional successfully treated patient exceeds the ICER and must be weighed against the costs of graft loss, continuing dialysis, and potential retransplant. This study provides a foundation for further research to update and expand inputs as more data become available to improve real-world relevance and decision making. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which provided clinical trial file data and nonbinding feedback on the model structure, data interpretation, clinical expertise, manuscript review, and areas of publication interest (ie, managed care). Hurwitz, Grizzle, Villa Zapata, and Malone received grant funding from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., through University of Arizona to conduct research and analysis for this study. Tyler is employed by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Some of the data reported and used in this research were available from the US Renal Data System, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utility Project. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the US government.

Sustained Inhibition of Calcineurin Activity With a Melt-Dose Once-daily Tacrolimus Formulation in Renal Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus (Tac) is the cornerstone calcineurin inhibitor in transplantation. Extended-release Meltdose formulation (Tac-LCP) offers better bioavailability compared with immediate-release formulation (Tac-IR). We postulated that the less fluctuating pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Tac-LCP might maintain a sustained inhibition of calcineurin activity (CNA) between dose intervals. Higher concentrations (peak plasma concentration (C_max )) after Tac-IR may not result in a more potent CNA inhibition due to a capacity-limited effect. This study was aimed at evaluating the pharmacodynamic (PD)/PK profiles of Tac-IR compared with Tac-LCP. An open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, investigator-driven study was conducted. Twenty-five kidney transplant recipients receiving Tac-IR were switched to Tac-LCP. Before and 28 days after conversion, intensive CNA-PD and PK sampling were conducted using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem accurate mass spectrometry. PD nonlinear mixed effects model was performed in Phoenix-WinNonlin. Statistically significant higher C_max (P < 0.001) after Tac-IR did not result in lower CNA as compared with after Tac-LCP (P = 0.860). Tac-LCP showed a statistically more maintained CNA inhibition between dose intervals (area under the effect-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUE_0-24h )) compared with Tac-IR, in which CNA returned to predose levels after 4 hours of drug intake (373.8 vs. 290.5 pmol RII·h/min·mg prot, Tac-LCP vs. Tac-IR; P = 0.039). No correlation was achieved between any PD and PK parameters in any formulations. Moreover, Tac concentration to elicit a 50% of the maximum response (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was 9.24 ng/mL. The higher C_max after Tac-IR does not result in an additional CNA inhibition compared with Tac-LCP attributable to a capacity-limited effect. Tac-LCP may represent an improvement of the PD of Tac due to the more sustained CNA inhibition during dose intervals.

Advances in personalized medicine and noninvasive diagnostics in solid organ transplantation

Personalized medicine has been a mainstay and in practice in transplant pharmacotherapy since the advent of the field. Decisions pertaining to the diagnosis, selection, and monitoring of transplant pharmacotherapy are aimed toward the individual, the allograft, and the overall immunologic needs of the patient. Recent advances in pharmacogenomics, noninvasive biomarkers, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have the promise of transforming the way we individualize treatment and monitor allograft function. Pharmacogenomic testing can provide clinicians with additional data that can minimize toxicity and maximize therapeutic dosing in high-risk patients, leading to more informed decisions that may decrease the risk of rejection and adverse outcomes related to immunosuppressive therapies. Development of noninvasive strategies to monitor allograft function may offer safer and more convenient methods to detect allograft injury. Cell free DNA and gene expression profiling offer the potential to serve as "liquid biopsies" minimizing the risk to patients and providing clinicians with useful molecular data that may help individualize immunosuppression and rejection treatment. Use of big data in transplant and novel AI platforms, such as the iBox, hold tremendous promise in providing clinicians a "glimpse into the future" thereby allowing for a more individualized approach to immunosuppressive therapy that may minimize future adverse outcomes. Advances in diagnostics, laboratory science, and AI have made the application of personalized medicine even more tailored for solid organ transplant recipients. In this perspective, we summarize the current and emerging tools available, literature supporting use, and the horizon for future personalization of transplantation.

Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy in Low Immunological Risk Renal Transplants Monitored by Sequential Surveillance Biopsies: The Influence of TAC Exposure and Metabolism

The combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate is the most widely employed maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplants. Different surrogates of tacrolimus exposure or metabolism such as tacrolimus trough levels (TAC-C₀), coefficient of variation of tacrolimus (CV-TAC-C₀), time in therapeutic range (TTR), and tacrolimus concentration dose ratio (C/D) have been associated with graft outcomes. We explore in a cohort of low immunological risk renal transplants (n = 85) treated with TAC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids and then monitored by paired surveillance biopsies the association between histological lesions and TAC-C₀ at the time of biopsy as well as CV-TAC-C₀, TTR, and C/D during follow up. Interstitial inflammation (i-Banff score ≥ 1) in the first surveillance biopsy was associated with TAC-C₀ (odds ratio (OR): 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.96; p = 0.027). In the second surveillance biopsy, inflammation was associated with time below the therapeutic range (OR: 1.05 and 95% CI: 1.01–1.10; p = 0.023). Interstitial inflammation in scarred areas (i-IFTA score ≥ 1) was not associated with surrogates of TAC exposure/metabolism. Progression of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) was observed in 35 cases (41.2%). Multivariate regression logistic analysis showed that mean C/D (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25–0.92; p = 0.026) and IF/TA in the first biopsy (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.77, p = 0.005) were associated with IF/TA progression between biopsies. A low C/D ratio is associated with IF/TA progression, suggesting that TAC nephrotoxicity may contribute to fibrosis progression in well immunosuppressed patients. Our data support that TAC exposure is associated with inflammation in healthy kidney areas but not in scarred tissue.

Real-World Administration of Once-Daily MeltDose® Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Allows for Dose Reduction of Tacrolimus and Stabilizes Graft Function Following Liver Transplantation

The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is included in most immunosuppressive protocols after liver transplantation. This retrospective, observational 24-month study investigated the tolerability of once-daily MeltDose^® prolonged-release tacrolimus (LCPT) after switching from twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in a real-world cohort of 150 patients with previous liver transplantation. No graft rejection or new safety signals were observed. Only 7.3% of patients discontinued LCPT due to side effects. In the overall patient population, median liver transaminases, total cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and HbA_1c remained constant after switching to LCPT. Total cholesterol significantly decreased (p ≤ 0.002) in patients with initially elevated levels (>200 mg/dL). A total of 71.8% of 96 patients maintained a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m² throughout the study, while 44.7% of patients were classified as fast metabolizers and 55.3% as slow metabolizers. Median daily tacrolimus dose could be reduced by 50% in fast metabolizers and by 30% in slow metabolizers, while trough levels were maintained in the target range (4–6 ng/mL). In conclusion, our observational study confirmed previous evidence of good overall tolerability and a favorable outcome for the patients after switching from IR-Tac to LCPT after liver transplantation.

Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations

Tacrolimus-modified release formulations allow for once-daily dosing, and adherence is better compared to the twice-daily immediate release formulation. When patients are switched from one formulation to another, variable changes in drug concentrations are observed. Current data suggest that the changes in drug exposure are larger in patients who express the CYP3A5 enzyme (CYP3A5 *1/*3 or *1/*1) compared to nonexpressers (CYP3A5*3/*3). Possibly, these differences are due to the fact that in the upper region of the small intestine CYP3A activity is higher, and that this expression of CYP3A decreases towards the more distal parts of the gut. Modified release formulations may therefore be subject to a less presystemic metabolism. However, the full implications of pharmacogenetic variants affecting the expression and function of drug transporters in the gut wall and of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II metabolism on the different formulations are incompletely understood, and additional studies are required. Conclusions: In all patients in whom the formulation of tacrolimus is changed, drug levels need to be checked to avoid clinically relevant under- or overexposure. In patients with the CYP3A5 expresser genotype, this recommendation is even more important, as changes in drug exposure can be expected.

The TOMATO Study (Tacrolimus Metabolization in Kidney Transplantation): Impact of the Concentration-Dose Ratio on Death-censored Graft Survival

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus trough concentrations (mean/variability), as well as concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D ratio), affect kidney allograft outcomes. We investigated the link between the C/D ratio and death-censored kidney graft survival (DCGS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 1029 kidney transplant patients (2004-2016) with the following criteria: tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, >1-year graft survival, no initial use of everolimus, and available anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody data. We analyzed the impact of the time-varying C/D ratio on DCGS. Fast metabolizers were defined by a C/D ratio < 1.05. We also investigated the effect of an early (mo 3 to mo 6 post transplantation) C/D ratio below 1.05. Cox survival analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounders (tacrolimus trough, variability of tacrolimus trough, de novo donor-specific antibody development, cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype, pregraft sensitization, mo 3 glomerular filtration rate).

RESULTS

Time-varying C/D ratio was significantly associated with DCGS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; P < 0.001) in a univariate model, on the full analysis set comprising 1029 patients. In the multivariate time-varying model, based on 666 patients with available cytochrome P450 3A5 genotypes, the effect of the C/D ratio remained significant (HR, 2.26; P = 0.015); even when glomerular filtration rate at month 3 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m (HR, 2.61; P = 0.011), de novo donor-specific antibody development (HR, 4.09; P < 0.001) and continued steroid prescription (HR=2.08, P = 0.014) were taken into account (other covariates, including tacrolimus trough concentrations, were nonsignificant). In the same multivariate model, the effect of early C/D ratio (median at mo 3 and mo 6) remained significantly associated with DCGS (HR, 2.25; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

C/D ratio is an independent and early predictor of DCGS. Identification of fast metabolizers could be a strategy to improve graft survival, for example, by optimizing tacrolimus formulation. Mechanistic studies to understand the C/D ratio effect are required.

The Clinical Impact of the C0/D Ratio and the CYP3A5 Genotype on Outcome in Tacrolimus Treated Kidney Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 enzymes. Patients expressing CYP3A5 (in Caucasian patients about 15% of the population but more frequent in African Americans and Asians) have a dose requirement that is around 50% higher than non-expressers to reach the target concentration. CYP3A5 expressers can be considered fast metabolizers. The trough concentration/dose (C₀/D) ratio of tacrolimus has recently been proposed as a prognostic marker for poor outcome after kidney transplantation. Patients with a low C₀/D ratio (also referred to as fast metabolizers) seem to have more tacrolimus-related nephrotoxicity, more BK-viremia, and a lower graft survival. At first sight, the expression of CYP3A5 and a low C₀/D ratio seem to be overlapping factors, both pointing towards patients in whom a higher tacrolimus dose is needed to reach the tacrolimus target concentration. However, there are important differences, and these differences may explain why the impact of the C₀/D ratio on long term outcome is stronger than for CYP3A5 genotype status. Patients with a low C₀/D ratio require a high tacrolimus dose and are exposed to high tacrolimus peak concentrations. The higher peak exposure to tacrolimus (and/or its metabolites) may explain the higher incidence of nephrotoxicity, BK-viremia and graft loss. A potential confounder is the concurrent maintenance treatment of corticosteroids, as steroids are sometimes continued in patients at high immunological risk. Steroids induce the metabolism of tacrolimus via pregnane X receptor mediated increased CYP3A4 expression, resulting in lower tacrolimus C₀/D ratio in high risk patients. Also non-adherence may result in lower C₀/D ratio which is also associated with poor outcome. The C₀/D ratio of tacrolimus does seem to identify a group of patients with increased risk of poor outcome after kidney transplantation. Our recommendation is to monitor tacrolimus peak concentrations in these patients, and if these are high then target slightly lower pre-dose concentrations. Another possibility would be to switch to a prolonged release formulation or to dose the drug more frequently, in smaller doses, to avoid high peak concentrations.

Effect of Concentration/Dose Ratio in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving LCP-Tacrolimus or Immediate-Release Tacrolimus: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Background

A previous phase 3 clinical trial in de novo adult kidney transplant recipients (NCT01187953) compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) and twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac). However, whether the rate of tacrolimus metabolism affects outcomes between LCPT and IR-Tac was not examined.

Material/Methods

Patients were initiated on 0.17 mg/kg/day LCPT or 0.1 mg/kg/day IR-Tac, with doses adjusted over time to maintain target therapeutic trough concentrations. This post hoc analysis examined dosing trends, relative efficacy, and safety of LCPT (n=247) and IR-Tac (n=249) in slow, intermediate, and rapid metabolizers as defined by concentration/dose ratios at day 30.

Results

For all metabolizer subgroups, minimum target tacrolimus trough concentrations were obtained more rapidly with LCPT than with IR-Tac. Slow metabolizers were more likely to exceed target trough concentrations with LCPT, while rapid metabolizers were more likely to fall below target trough concentrations with IR-Tac. Regardless of metabolizer status, significant differences were not detected between LCPT and IR-Tac for treatment failure, death, graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or other clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Although within metabolizer subgroups, attainment of target trough concentrations in the first week differed between LCPT and IR-Tac, these results suggest that, regardless of metabolizer phenotype, clinical outcomes do not differ between these formulations when dose adjustments are made.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01187953

Impacts of High Intra- and Inter-Individual Variability in Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics and Fast Tacrolimus Metabolism on Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus is a first-line calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and an integral part of the immunosuppressive strategy in solid organ transplantation. Being a dose-critical drug, tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index that necessitates periodic monitoring to maintain the drug’s efficacy and reduce the consequences of overexposure. Tacrolimus is characterized by substantial intra- and inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. At steady state, the tacrolimus blood concentration to daily dose ratio (C/D ratio) has been described as a surrogate for the estimation of the individual metabolism rate, where a low C/D ratio reflects a higher rate of metabolism. Fast tacrolimus metabolism (low C/D ratio) is associated with the risk of poor outcomes after transplantation, including reduced allograft function and survival, higher allograft rejection, CNI nephrotoxicity, a faster decline in kidney function, reduced death-censored graft survival (DCGS), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular events. In this article, we discuss the potential role of the C/D ratio in a noninvasive monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk for potential adverse events post-transplant.

Tacrolimus trough levels higher than 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year in stable kidney transplant recipients

Background

Little is known regarding optimal tacrolimus (TAC) trough levels after 1 year post-transplant in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who have not experienced renal or cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of 1-year post-transplant TAC trough levels on long-term renal and cardiovascular outcomes and opportunistic infections in stable KTRs.

Methods

KTRs receiving TAC with mycophenolate-based immunosuppression who did not experience renal or cardiovascular outcomes within 1 year post-transplant were enrolled from a multicenter observational cohort study. Renal outcome was defined as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and death-censored graft loss. Cardiovascular outcome was defined as a composite of de novo cardiomegaly, left ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiovascular events. Opportunistic infections were defined as the occurrence of BK virus or cytomegalovirus infections.

Results

A total of 603 eligible KTRs were divided into the low-level TAC (LL-TAC) and high-level TAC (HL-TAC) groups based on a median TAC level of 5.9 ng/mL (range 1.3–14.3) at 1 year post-transplant. The HL-TAC group had significantly higher TAC trough levels at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years compared with the levels of the LL-TAC group. During the mean follow-up of 63.7 ± 13.0 months, there were 121 renal outcomes and 224 cardiovascular outcomes. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, LL-TAC and HL-TAC were not independent risk factors for renal and cardiovascular outcomes, respectively. No significant differences in the development of opportunistic infections and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and renal allograft function were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

TAC trough levels after 1 year post-transplant remained at a similar level until the fifth year after kidney transplantation and were not directly associated with long-term outcomes in stable Korean KTRs who did not experience renal or cardiovascular outcomes. Therefore, in Asian KTRs with a stable clinical course, TAC trough levels higher than approximately 6 ng/mL might not be required after a year of kidney transplantation.

Effectiveness of Maintenance Immunosuppression Therapies in a Matched-Pair Analysis Cohort of 16 Years of Renal Transplant in the Brazilian National Health System

The maintenance of patients with renal transplant typically involves two or more drugs to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival. The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the most commonly recommended medicines in combinations with others. While immunosuppressive treatment regimens are well established, there is insufficient long-term effectiveness data to help guide future management decisions. The study analyzes the effectiveness of treatment regimens containing CNI after renal transplantation during 16 years of follow-up with real-world data from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS). This was a retrospective study of 2318 SUS patients after renal transplantion. Patients were propensity score-matched (1:1) by sex, age, type and year of transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probabilities of survival. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors associated with progression to graft loss. Multivariable analysis, adjusted for diabetes mellitus and race/color, showed a greater risk of graft loss for patients using tacrolimus plus mycophenolate compared to patients treated with cyclosporine plus azathioprine. In conclusion, this Brazilian real-world study, with a long follow-up period using matched analysis for relevant clinical features and the representativeness of the sample, demonstrated improved long-term effectiveness for therapeutic regimens containing cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Consequently, we recommend that protocols and clinical guidelines for renal transplantation should consider the cyclosporine plus azathioprine regimen as a potential first line option, along with others.

A review of clinical pharmacogenetics Studies in African populations

Effective interventions and treatments for complex diseases have been implemented globally, however, coverage in Africa has been comparatively lower due to lack of capacity, clinical applicability and knowledge on the genetic contribution to disease and treatment. Currently, there is a scarcity of genetic data on African populations, which have enormous genetic diversity. Pharmacogenomics studies have the potential to revolutionise treatment of diseases, therefore, African populations are likely to benefit from these approaches to identify likely responders, reduce adverse side effects and optimise drug dosing. This review discusses clinical pharmacogenetics studies conducted in African populations, focusing on studies that examined drug response in complex diseases relevant to healthcare. Several pharmacogenetics associations have emerged from African studies, as have gaps in knowledge.

Association of Genetic Variants in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, and CYP2C19 with Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to investigate the pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P3A4 (CYP3A4), CYP3A5, CYP2C8, and CYP2C19 and their influence on TAC Pharmacokinetics (PKs) in short-term renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

A total of 105 renal transplant recipients were enrolled. Target Sequencing (TS) based on next-generation sequencing technology was used to detect all exons, exon/intron boundaries, and flanking regions of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, and CYP2C19. After adjustment of Minor Allele Frequencies (MAF) and Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) analysis, tagger Single-nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes were identified. Influence of tagger SNPs on TAC concentrations was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 94 SNPs were identified in TS analysis. Nine tagger SNPs were selected, and two SNPs (rs15524 and rs4646453) were noted to be significantly associated with TAC PKs in short-term post-transplant follow-up. Measurement time points of TAC, body mass index (BMI), usage of sirolimus, and incidence of Delayed Graft Function (DGF) were observed to be significantly associated with TAC PKs. Three haplotypes were identified, and rs15524-rs4646453 was found to remarkably contribute to TAC PKs. Recipients carrying H2/H2 (GG-AA) haplotype also showed significantly high weight- and dose-adjusted TAC concentrations in posttransplant periods of 7, 14, and 30 days and 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Two tagger SNPs, namely, rs15524 and rs4646453, are significantly related to the variability of TAC disposition, and TAC measurement time points, BMI, usage of sirolimus, and incidence of DGF contribute to this influence. Recipients carrying H2/H2 (GG-AA) haplotype in rs15524-rs4646453 may require a low dosage of TAC during 1-year follow-up posttransplant.

Optimization of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: New pharmacokinetic perspectives

Tacrolimus is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation (KT), but its use is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index and high inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability. There are three available oral formulations of tacrolimus: immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) and a MeltDose® (LCPT) formulation, the latter favoring a prolonged drug release and increased bioavailability. The time-concentration curves of these formulations are different. Compared with IR-Tac and ER-Tac, LCPT has a relatively flat pharmacokinetic profile with less fluctuation between trough and peak exposures, and a delayed peak concentration. This translates to a more stable delivery of tacrolimus and may alleviate the risk of underexposure and allograft rejection or overexposure and toxicity. The once-daily formulation of both ER-TAC and LCPT may also offer a potential advantage on patient adherence. Fast metabolizers of tacrolimus, the elderly, and human leukocyte antigen-sensitized patients are at risk of poorer outcomes after KT, possibly associated with a different exhibited pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus or different requirements in terms of exposure. Simple, practical strategies are needed to identify patients at risk of suboptimal KT outcomes and those who would benefit from a more proactively personalized approach to tacrolimus treatment. This review aims to increase awareness of the link between the pharmacokinetics of oral tacrolimus formulations and the clinical needs of patients after KT, particularly among those who have clinically significant pharmacokinetic variation of tacrolimus.

The Many Faces of Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity-What the FK?

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are both the savior and Achilles' heel of kidney transplantation. Although CNIs have significantly reduced rates of acute rejection, their numerous toxicities can plague kidney transplant recipients. By 10 years, virtually all allografts will have evidence of CNI nephrotoxicity. CNIs have been strongly associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and new onset of diabetes after transplantation-significantly contributing to cardiovascular risk in the kidney transplant recipient. Multiple electrolyte derangements including hyperkalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypercalciuria, metabolic acidosis, and hyperuricemia may be challenging to manage for the clinician. Finally, CNI-associated tremor, gingival hyperplasia, and defects in hair growth can have a significant impact on the transplant recipient's quality of life. In this review, the authors briefly discuss the pharmacokinetics of CNI and discuss the numerous clinically relevant toxicities of commonly used CNIs, cyclosporine and tacrolimus.

A Low Tacrolimus Concentration/Dose Ratio Increases the Risk for the Development of Acute Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Nephrotoxicity

Fast tacrolimus metabolism is linked to inferior outcomes such as rejection and lower renal function after kidney transplantation. Renal calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity is a common adverse effect of tacrolimus therapy. The present contribution hypothesized that tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity is related to a low concentration/dose (C/D) ratio. We analyzed renal tubular epithelial cell cultures and 55 consecutive kidney transplant biopsy samples with tacrolimus-induced toxicity, the C/D ratio, C0, C2, and C4 Tac levels, pulse wave velocity analyses, and sublingual endothelial glycocalyx dimensions in the selected kidney transplant patients. A low C/D ratio (C/D ratio < 1.05 ng/mL×1/mg) was linked with higher C2 tacrolimus blood concentrations (19.2 ± 8.7 µg/L vs. 12.2 ± 5.2 µg/L respectively; p = 0.001) and higher degrees of nephrotoxicity despite comparable trough levels (6.3 ± 2.4 µg/L vs. 6.6 ± 2.2 µg/L respectively; p = 0.669). However, the tacrolimus metabolism rate did not affect the pulse wave velocity or glycocalyx in patients. In renal tubular epithelial cells exposed to tacrolimus according to a fast metabolism pharmacokinetic profile it led to reduced viability and increased Fn14 expression. We conclude from our data that the C/D ratio may be an appropriate tool for identifying patients at risk of developing calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity.

Tacrolimus Concentration-to-Dose Ratios in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Relationship to Clinical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

One factor impacting tacrolimus interpatient variability is the presence of CYP3A5 polymorphisms. Low tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratios (CDRs), or rapid metabolizers (RMs), have been associated with poor graft function outcomes and higher biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates in a predominantly white population. Pretransplant CYP genotyping is not routinely conducted, and therefore only a small number of studies have assessed the use of tacrolimus CDRs as a surrogate for metabolism. We explored differences in outcomes between patients with low tacrolimus CDRs and high tacrolimus CDRs (i.e., nonrapid metabolizers [NRMs]) in a diverse patient population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between tacrolimus CDRs and graft and patient outcomes in kidney transplant recipients at a large transplant center between 2006 and 2016.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria consisted of adult kidney transplant recipients who received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction followed by a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. The primary end point was BPAR at 1 year. Secondary end points included graft survival, patient survival, and toxicities. Determination of clusters was conducted using the two-step cluster analysis with a defined two-cluster distribution. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The NRM cluster consisted of 322 patients with a mean CDR of 2.91 ng/ml/mg. The RM cluster consisted of 932 patients with a mean CDR of 1.14 ng/ml/mg. The BPAR at 1 year posttransplant was 3.7% in the NRM cluster and 3.6% in the RM cluster (p=0.95). Death at 5 years was higher in the NRM group compared with the RM group for unknown reasons (p=0.03). Differences in the incidence of posttransplant toxicities were not statistically significant at any time point, except for increased rates of cutaneous cancer at 5 years and cardiovascular disease overall in the NRM group.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring tacrolimus therapy early posttransplant based on CDR is not supported by the findings in this study.

Therapeutic concentration achievement and allograft survival comparing usage of conventional tacrolimus doses and CYP3A5 genotype-guided doses in renal transplantation patients

AIMS

Although cytochromeP450(CYP)3A5 gene polymorphism affects personalized tacrolimus doses, there is no consensus as to whether CYP3A5 genotypes should be determined to adjust the doses. The aims were to compare the therapeutic ranges and clinical outcomes between the conventional and genotype-guided tacrolimus doses.

METHODS

This randomized controlled study compared 63 cases of the conventional tacrolimus dose group (0.1 mg/kg/day) with 62 cases of the genotype-guided doses group of 0.125, 0.1 and 0.08 mg/kg for CYP3A5*1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3 genotypes for the initial 3 days of kidney transplantation. After day 3, dose adjustment occurred in both groups to achieve therapeutic concentrations.

RESULTS

The genotype-guided group had an increased proportion of patients with tacrolimus concentrations in the therapeutic range at the steady state on day 3 (40.3 vs 23.8%, P = .048). A lower proportion of over-therapeutic concentration patients was noted in the genotype-guided group in the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (9.7 vs 27%, P = .013). Unexpectedly, more delayed graft functions (DGFs) were in the genotype-guided group (41.9 vs 22.2%, P = .018) especially in the CYP3A5*1/*1 participants who might have had an aggravated DGF by a longer ischaemic time and higher serum donor creatinine levels than in the control group. There were no significant differences of glomerular filtration rates or graft or patient survivals over a median 37-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of the CYP3A5 genotype improved therapeutic range achievement. CYP3A5*1/*1 patients who have high risks of DGF should be closely monitored because of an increased risk of DGF and reduced glomerular filtration rate with high tacrolimus doses.