Addressing the Need for Clinical Trial End Points in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Report From the Polycystic Kidney Disease Outcomes Consortium (PKDOC)

Biomarkers in Polycystic Kidney Disease: Are We There?

This article describes the use of prognostic, predictive, and response biomarkers that have been developed for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and their use in clinical care or drug development. We focus on biochemical markers that can be assayed in patients' blood and urine and their association with the outcome of decreased glomerular filtration rate. There have been several studies on prognostic biomarkers. The most promising ones have been markers of tubular injury, inflammation, metabolism, or the vasopressin-urinary concentration axis. So far, none have been shown to be superior to kidney volume-based biomarkers. Several biomarkers are additive to kidney volume and genotype in prognostic models, but there have been few direct comparisons between the biochemical markers to identify the best ones. Moreover, there is a lack of uniformity in the statistical tools used to assess and compare biomarkers. There have been few reports of predictive and response biomarkers, and none are suitable surrogate endpoints. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Biomarker Qualification Program provides a regulatory pathway to approve biomarkers for use across multiple drug-development programs.

Drug Development in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Opportunities and Challenges

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a hereditary disorder characterized by relentless growth of innumerable renal cysts bilaterally, associated with decline in glomerular filtration rate over the course of decades. The burden of ADPKD and its treatment is associated with a significant economic and societal cost. Despite several clinical studies conducted over the past decade, only one treatment has been approved by regulatory agencies to slow disease progression in ADPKD. Elucidating feasible endpoints and clear regulatory pathway may stimulate interest in developing and translating novel therapeutics. This review summarizes the recent progress, challenges, and opportunities in drug development for ADPKD. We discuss the traditional and accelerated regulatory approval pathways, the various clinical trials endpoints, and biomarkers in ADPKD. Furthermore, we propose strategies that could optimize the clinical trial design in ADPKD. Finally, we owe it to our ADPKD patient community to strive for international collaborative studies geared toward discovery and validation of surrogate endpoints and to rally for funded infrastructure that would allow phase 3 master protocols in ADPKD. These advances will serve to derisk and potentially accelerate the development of therapies and eventually bring hope to patients and families who endure through this devastating disease.

Polycystic Kidney Disease Drug Development: A Conference Report

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is part of a spectrum of inherited diseases that also includes autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease, and an expanding group of recessively inherited disorders collectively termed hepatorenal fibrocystic disorders. ADPKD is the most common monogenic disorder frequently leading to chronic kidney failure with an estimated prevalence of 12 million people worldwide. Currently, only one drug (tolvaptan) has been approved by regulatory agencies as disease-modifying therapy for ADPKD, but, given its mechanism of action and side effect profile, the need for an improved therapy for ADPKD remains a priority. Although significant regulatory progress has been made, with qualification of total kidney volume as a prognostic enrichment biomarker and its later designation as a reasonably likely surrogate endpoint for progression of ADPKD within clinical trials, further work is needed to accelerate drug development efforts for all forms of PKD. In May 2021, the PKD Outcomes Consortium at the Critical Path Institute and the PKD Foundation organized a PKD Regulatory Summit to spur conversations among patients, industry, academic, and regulatory stakeholders regarding future development of tools and drugs for ADPKD and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. This Special Report reviews the key points discussed during the summit and provides future direction related to PKD drug development tools.

The STAGED-PKD 2-Stage Adaptive Study With a Patient Enrichment Strategy and Treatment Effect Modeling for Improved Study Design Efficiency in Patients With ADPKD

Rationale & Objective

Venglustat, a glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor, inhibits cyst growth and reduces kidney failure in mouse models of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). STAGED-PKD aims to determine the safety and efficacy of venglustat and was designed using patient enrichment for progression to end-stage kidney disease and modeling from prior ADPKD trials.

Study Design

STAGED-PKD is a 2-stage, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with ADPKD (Mayo Class 1C-1E) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 45-<90 mL/min/1.73 m² at risk of rapidly progressive disease. Enrichment for rapidly progressing patients was identified based on retrospective analysis of total kidney volume (TKV) and eGFR slope from the combined Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease and HALT Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease A studies.

Setting & Participants

Target enrollment in stages 1 and 2 was 240 and 320 patients, respectively.

Interventions

Stage 1 randomizes patients 1:1:1 to venglustat 8 mg or 15 mg once daily or placebo. Stage 2 randomizes patients 1:1 to placebo or venglustat, with the preferred dose based on stage 1 safety data.

Outcomes

Primary endpoints are TKV growth rate over 18 months in stage 1 and eGFR slope over 24 months in stage 2. Secondary endpoints include: annualized rate of change in eGFR from baseline to 18 months (stage 1); annualized rate of change in TKV based on magnetic resonance imaging from baseline to 18 months (stage 2); and safety, tolerability, pain, and fatigue (stages 1 and 2).

Limitations

If stage 1 is unsuccessful, patients enrolled in the trial may develop drug-related adverse events that can have long-lasting effects.

Conclusions

Modeling allows the design and powering of a 2-stage combined study to assess venglustat’s impact on TKV growth and eGFR slope. Stage 1 TKV assessment via a nested approach allows early evaluation of efficacy and increased efficiency of the trial design by reducing patient numbers and trial duration.

Funding

This study was funded by Sanofi.

Trial registration

STAGED-PKD has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03523728.

The predictive value of renal parenchymal information for renal function impairment in patients with ADPKD: a multicenter prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Although the guideline indicates that total kidney volume (TKV) is an important detection indicator in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), this study attempted to demonstrate that renal parenchymal information, combined with parenchymal volume and radiomics features, may have more valuable clinical guiding significance.

METHODS

A totals of 340 ADPKD patients with normal renal function were prospectively collected and followed-up for five years, with renal function tests and non-contrast computed tomography (CT) performed every six months. The relationship between renal function impairment and renal parenchymal volume (RPV) as along with radiomics features was explored using a multiple linear regression model and multiple logistic regression. Then, a combined model of RPV with radiomics features was constructed to comprehensively evaluate its predictive value.

RESULTS

Compared with TKV, decreased RPV presented a closer relationship with renal function impairment, namely, with the impairment rate (RPV: 82.3% vs. TVK: 67.1%) and eGFR (RPV: r = 0.614, p < 0.001 vs. TKV: r = -0.452, p < 0.001), and showed higher predictive power (RPV: AUC = 0.752 [95%CI 0.692-0.805], p < 0.001 vs. TKV: AUC = 0.711 [95%CI 0.649-0.768], p < 0.001). Correspondingly, the radiomics analysis that was derived from the renal parenchyma also showed a satisfactory result (AUC = 0.849 [95%Cl 0.797-0.892], p < 0.001). Importantly, the predictive power for renal function impairment was further improved in the combined model of RPV and radiomics features (AUC = 0.902 [95%Cl 0.857-0.937], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Renal parenchyma information may be a sensitive biomarker of renal function impairment in ADPKD, which can provide a new approach for clinically monitoring renal function, and may greatly improve the pre-hospital prevention and treatment effects.

Predictors of progression in autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) are characterized by bilateral cystic kidney disease leading to progressive kidney function decline. These diseases also have distinct liver manifestations. The range of clinical presentation and severity of both ADPKD and ARPKD is much wider than was once recognized. Pediatric and adult nephrologists are likely to care for individuals with both diseases in their lifetimes. This article will review genetic, clinical, and imaging predictors of kidney and liver disease progression in ADPKD and ARPKD and will briefly summarize pharmacologic therapies to prevent progression.

Primary results of the randomized trial of metformin administration in polycystic kidney disease (TAME PKD)

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is characterized by growth of kidney cysts and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline. Metformin was found to impact cystogenesis in preclinical models of polycystic disease, is generally considered safe and may be a promising candidate for clinical investigation in ADPKD. In this phase 2 two-year trial, we randomly assigned 97 patients, 18-60 years of age, with ADPKD and estimated GFR over 50 ml/min/1.73 m², in a 1:1 ratio to receive metformin or placebo twice daily. Primary outcomes were medication safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included estimated GFR decline, and total kidney volume growth. Thirty-eight metformin and 39 placebo participants still received study product at 24-months. Twenty-one participants in the metformin arm reduced drug dose due to inability to tolerate, compared with 14 in the placebo arm (not significant). Proportions of participants experiencing serious adverse events was similar between the groups. The Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale score was low at baseline and did not significantly change over time. The annual change for estimated GFR was -1.71 with metformin and -3.07 ml/min/1.73m² per year with placebo (mean difference 1.37 {-0.70, 3.44} ml/min/1.73m²), while mean annual percent change in height-adjusted total kidney volume was 3.87% in metformin and 2.16% per year in placebo, (mean difference 1.68% {-2.11, 5.62}). Thus, metformin in adults with ADPKD was found to be safe and tolerable while slightly reducing estimated GFR decline but not to a significant degree. Hence, evaluation of efficacy requires a larger trial, with sufficient power to detect differences in endpoints.

Targeting chloride transport in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most frequent inherited kidney disease. Transepithelial fluid secretion is one of the key factors of cystogenesis in ADPKD. Multiple studies have suggested that fluid secretion across ADPKD cyst-lining cells is driven by the secretion of chloride, essentially mediated by the CFTR channel and stimulated by increased intracellular levels of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of fluid secretion in ADPKD based on the pioneering studies of Jared Grantham and colleagues, and on the follow-up investigations from the molecular level to the potential applications in ADPKD patients. Altogether, the studies of fluid and chloride transport in ADPKD paved the way for innovative therapeutic targets to prevent cyst volume expansion and thus, kidney disease progression.

Core Outcome Domains for Trials in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: An International Delphi Survey

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Outcomes reported in trials involving patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) are heterogeneous and rarely include patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to identify critically important consensus-based core outcome domains to be reported in trials in ADPKD.

STUDY DESIGN

An international 2-round online Delphi survey was conducted in English, French, and Korean languages.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients/caregivers and health professionals completed a 9-point Likert scale (7-9 indicating critical importance) and a Best-Worst Scale.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

The absolute and relative importance of outcomes were assessed. Comments were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

1,014 participants (603 [60%] patients/caregivers, 411 [40%] health professionals) from 56 countries completed round 1, and 713 (70%) completed round 2. The prioritized outcomes were kidney function (importance score, 8.6), end-stage kidney disease (8.6), death (7.9), blood pressure (7.9), kidney cyst size/growth (7.8), and cerebral aneurysm (7.7). Kidney cyst-related pain was the highest rated patient-reported outcome by both stakeholder groups. Seven themes explained the prioritization of outcomes: protecting life and health, directly encountering life-threatening and debilitating consequences, specificity to ADPKD, optimizing and extending quality of life, hidden suffering, destroying self-confidence, and lost opportunities.

LIMITATIONS

Study design precluded involvement from those without access to internet or limited computer literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney function, end-stage kidney disease, and death were the most important outcomes to patients, caregivers, and health professionals. Kidney cyst-related pain was the highest rated patient-reported outcome. Consistent reporting of these top prioritized outcomes may strengthen the value of trials in ADPKD for decision making.

High water vs. ad libitum water intake for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a randomized controlled feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin stimulates cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and is a key therapeutic target. Evaluation of high water intake as an alternative to pharmacological vasopressin blockade is supported by patients. However feasibility, safety and adherence-promoting strategies required to deliver this remain unknown.

AIMS

Assess the feasibility of a definitive randomized high water intake trial in ADPKD.

METHODS

In this prospective open-label randomized trial, adult ADPKD patients with eGFR ≥ 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 were randomized to prescribed high water (HW) intake targeting urine osmolality (UOsm) ≤270 mOsm/kg, or ad libitum (AW) intake (UOsm >300 mOsm/kg). Self-management strategies including home-monitoring of urine-specific gravity (USG) were employed to promote adherence.

RESULTS

We enrolled 42 participants, baseline median eGFR (HW 68.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 35.9-107.2] vs. AW 75.8 [IQR 59.0-111.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.22) and UOsm (HW 353 [IQR 190-438] vs. AW 350 [IQR 240-452] mOsm/kg, P = 0.71) were similar between groups. After 8 weeks, 67% in the HW vs. 24% in AW group achieved UOsm ≤270 mOsm/kg, P = 0.001. HW group achieved lower UOsm (194 [IQR 190-438] vs. 379 [IQR 235-503] mOsm/kg, P = 0.01) and higher urine volumes (3155 [IQR 2270-4295] vs. 1920 [IQR 1670-2960] ml/day, P = 0.02). Two cases of hyponatraemia occurred in HW group. No acute GFR effects were detected. In total 79% (519/672) of USG were submitted and 90% (468/519) were within target. Overall, 17% withdrew during the study.

CONCLUSION

DRINK demonstrated successful recruitment and adherence leading to separation between treatment arms in primary outcomes. These findings suggest a definitive trial assessing the impact of high water on kidney disease progression in ADPKD is feasible.

Range and Variability of Outcomes Reported in Randomized Trials Conducted in Patients With Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Trials in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) have increased, but their impact on decision making has been limited. Because heterogeneity in reported outcomes may be responsible, we assessed their range and variability in ADPKD trials.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATION

Adult participants in clinical trials in ADPKD.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

We included trials that studied adults and were published in English. For trials that enrolled patients without ADPKD, only those enrolling ≥50% of participants with ADPKD were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

We extracted information on all discrete outcome measures, grouped them into 97 domains, and classified them into clinical, surrogate, and patient-reported categories. For each category, we choose the 3 most frequently reported domains and performed a detailed analysis of outcome measures.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Frequencies and characteristics of outcome measures were described.

RESULTS

Among 68 trials, 1,413 different outcome measures were reported. 97 domains were identified; 41 (42%) were surrogate, 30 (31%) were clinical, and 26 (27%) were patient reported. The 3 most frequently reported domains were in the surrogate category: kidney function (54; 79% of trials; using 46 measures), kidney and cyst volumes (43; 63% of trials; 52 measures), and blood pressure (27; 40% of trials, 30 measures); in the clinical category: infection (10; 15%; 21 measures), cardiovascular events (9; 13%; 6 measures), and kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (8; 12%; 5 measures); and in the patient-reported category: pain related to ADPKD (16; 24%; 26 measures), pain for other reasons (11; 16%; 11 measures), and diarrhea/constipation/gas (10; 15%; 9 measures).

LIMITATIONS

Outcome measures were assessed for only the top 3 domains in each category.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes in ADPKD trials are broad in scope and highly variable. Surrogate outcomes were most frequently reported. Patient-reported outcomes were uncommon. A consensus-based set of core outcomes meaningful to patients and clinicians is needed for future ADPKD trials.