1
|
Adenwalla SF, O'Halloran P, Faull C, Murtagh FEM, Graham-Brown MPM. Advance care planning for patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis: narrative review of the current evidence, and future considerations. J Nephrol 2024; 37:547-560. [PMID: 38236475 PMCID: PMC11150316 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01841-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a high symptom-burden and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite this, evidence has shown that this patient group does not have timely discussions to plan for deterioration and death, and at the end of life there are unmet palliative care needs. Advance care planning is a process that can help patients share their personal values and preferences for their future care and prepare for declining health. Earlier, more integrated and holistic advance care planning has the potential to improve access to care services, communication, and preparedness for future decision-making and changing circumstances. However, there are many barriers to successful implementation of advance care planning in this population. In this narrative review we discuss the current evidence for advance care planning in patients on dialysis, the data around the barriers to advance care planning implementation, and interventions that have been trialled. The review explores whether the concepts and approaches to advance care planning in this population need to be updated to encompass current and future care. It suggests that a shift from a problem-orientated approach to a goal-orientated approach may lead to better engagement, with more patient-centred and satisfying outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Adenwalla
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - P O'Halloran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - C Faull
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - F E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - M P M Graham-Brown
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hamroun A, Glowacki F, Frimat L. Comprehensive conservative care: what doctors say, what patients hear. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 38:2428-2443. [PMID: 37156527 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The demographic evolution of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) has led to the advent of an alternative treatment option to kidney replacement therapy in the past couple of decades. The KDIGO controversies on Kidney Supportive Care called this approach "comprehensive conservative care" (CCC) and defined it as planned holistic patient-centered care for patients with CKD stage 5 that does not include dialysis. Although the benefit of this treatment option is now well-recognized, especially for the elderly, and comorbid and frail patients, its development remains limited in practice. While shared decision-making and advance care planning represent the cornerstones of the CCC approach, one of the main barriers in its development is the perfectible communication between nephrologists and patients, but also between all healthcare professionals involved in the care of advanced CKD patients. As a result, a significant gap has opened up between what doctors say and what patients hear. Indeed, although CCC is reported by nephrologists to be widely available in their facilities, few of their patients say that they have actually heard of it. The objectives of this review are to explore discrepancies between what doctors say and what patients hear, to identify the factors underlying this gap, and to formulate practical proposals for narrowing this gap in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aghiles Hamroun
- Lille University, Lille University Hospital Center of Lille, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, and Apheresis, Lille, France
- University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR1167 RID-AGE, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - François Glowacki
- Lille University, Lille University Hospital Center of Lille, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, and Apheresis, Lille, France
- University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Luc Frimat
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Inserm, CIC-1433 Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hamroun A, Speyer E, Ayav C, Combe C, Fouque D, Jacquelinet C, Laville M, Liabeuf S, Massy ZA, Pecoits-Filho R, Robinson BM, Glowacki F, Stengel B, Frimat L. Barriers to conservative care from patients' and nephrologists' perspectives: the CKD-REIN study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:2438-2448. [PMID: 35026014 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative care is increasingly considered an alternative to kidney replacement therapy for kidney failure management, mostly among the elderly. We investigated its status and the barriers to its implementation from patients' and providers' perspectives. METHODS We analysed data from 1204 patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2] enrolled at 40 nationally representative nephrology clinics (2013-16) who completed a self-administered questionnaire about the information they received and their preferred treatment option, including conservative care, if their kidneys failed. Nephrologists (n = 137) also reported data about their clinics' resources and practices regarding conservative care. RESULTS All participating facilities reported they were routinely able to offer conservative care, but only 37% had written protocols and only 5% had a person or team primarily responsible for it. Overall, 6% of patients were estimated to use conservative care. Among nephrologists, 82% reported they were fairly or extremely comfortable discussing conservative care, but only 28% usually or always offered this option for older (>75 years) patients approaching kidney failure. They used various terminology for this care, with conservative management and non-dialysis care mentioned most often. Among patients, 5% of those >75 years reported receiving information about this option and 2% preferring it. CONCLUSIONS Although reported by nephrologists to be widely available and easily discussed, conservative care is only occasionally offered to older patients, most of whom report they were not informed of this option. The lack of a person or team responsible for conservative care and unclear information appear to be key barriers to its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aghilès Hamroun
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, Villejuif, France.,Lille University, University Hospital of Lille, Nephrology Department, Lille, France
| | - Elodie Speyer
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Ayav
- CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, CIC 1433, Epidémiologie Clinique, Nancy, France
| | - Christian Combe
- Service de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Inserm U1026, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Denis Fouque
- Service de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.,Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Carmen INSERM U1060, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | - Maurice Laville
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Carmen INSERM U1060, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sophie Liabeuf
- Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Département de recherche clinique CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.,Laboratoire MP3CV, EA7517, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Ziad A Massy
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, Villejuif, France.,Service de néphrologie, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | | | | | - François Glowacki
- Lille University, University Hospital of Lille, Nephrology Department, Lille, France
| | - Bénédicte Stengel
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Luc Frimat
- Service de Néphrologie, CHRU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wong SPY, Foglia MB, Cohen J, Oestreich T, O'Hare AM. The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2517-2529. [PMID: 35435246 PMCID: PMC9790645 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Documentation of patients' goals of care is integral to promoting goal-concordant care. In 2017, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched a system-wide initiative to standardize documentation of patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LST) and related goals-of-care conversations (GoCC) that included using a note template in its national electronic medical record system. We describe implementation of the LST note based on documentation in the medical records of patients with advanced kidney disease, a group that has traditionally experienced highly intensive patterns of care. METHODS We performed a qualitative analysis of documentation in the VA electronic medical record for a national random sample of 500 adults with advanced kidney disease for whom at least one LST note was completed between July 2018 and March 2019 to identify prominent themes pertaining to the content and context of LST notes. RESULTS During the observation period, a total of 723 (mean 1.5, range 1-6) LST notes were completed for this cohort. Two themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Reactive approach: LST notes were largely completed in response to medical crises, in which they focused on short-term goals and preferences rather than patients' broader health and goals, or certain clinical encounters designated by the initiative as "triggering events" for LST note completion; (2) Practitioner-driven: Documentation suggested that practitioners would attempt to engage patients/surrogates in GoCC to lay out treatment options in order to move care forward, but patients/surrogates sometimes appeared reluctant to engage in GoCC and had difficulty communicating in ways that practitioners could understand. CONCLUSIONS Standardized documentation of patients' treatment preferences and related GoCC was used to inform in-the-moment decision-making during acute illness and certain junctures in care. There is opportunity to expand standardized documentation practices and related GoCC to address patients'/surrogates' broader health concerns and goals and to enhance their engagement in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P. Y. Wong
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Mary Beth Foglia
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Jennifer Cohen
- VA National Center for Ethics in Health CareSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Ann M. O'Hare
- Division of NephrologyVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
[Comprehensive conservative care of stage 5-CKD: A practical guide]. Nephrol Ther 2022; 18:155-171. [PMID: 35732405 DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
In French-speaking countries, the anglicism "traitement conservateur" is commonly used in clinical practice for CKD 5 patients, meaning comprehensive conservative care. In 2015, the publication of KDIGO controversies put forward this "new" therapeutic option at the same level as dialysis or transplantation. However, its detailed contents remain heterogeneous due to cultural and ethical considerations, varying with regional or national health systems. This is the reason why the French-speaking society of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation (SFNDT) set up an international debate to publish clinical guidelines in French.
Collapse
|
6
|
Eneanya ND, Lakin JR, Paasche-Orlow MK, Lindvall C, Moseley ET, Henault L, Hanchate AD, Mandel EI, Wong SPY, Zupanc SN, Davis AD, El-Jawahri A, Quintiliani LM, Chang Y, Waikar SS, Bansal AD, Schell JO, Lundquist AL, Tamura MK, Yu MK, Unruh ML, Argyropoulos C, Germain MJ, Volandes A. Video Images about Decisions for Ethical Outcomes in Kidney Disease (VIDEO-KD): the study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059313. [PMID: 35396311 PMCID: PMC8996022 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) often are inadequately prepared to make informed decisions about treatments including dialysis and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Further, evidence shows that patients with advanced CKD do not commonly engage in advance care planning (ACP), may suffer from poor quality of life, and may be exposed to end-of-life care that is not concordant with their goals. We aim to study the effectiveness of a video intervention on ACP, treatment preferences and other patient-reported outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Video Images about Decisions for Ethical Outcomes in Kidney Disease trial is a multi-centre randomised controlled trial that will test the effectiveness of an intervention that includes a CKD-related video decision aid followed by recording personal video declarations about goals of care and treatment preferences in older adults with advancing CKD. We aim to enrol 600 patients over 5 years at 10 sites. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Regulatory and ethical aspects of this trial include a single Institutional Review Board mechanism for approval, data use agreements among sites, and a Data Safety and Monitoring Board. We intend to disseminate findings at national meetings and publish our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04347629.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nwamaka D Eneanya
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael K Paasche-Orlow
- Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward T Moseley
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lori Henault
- Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amresh D Hanchate
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ernest I Mandel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Renal (Kidney) Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan P Y Wong
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington State, USA
| | - Sophia N Zupanc
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lisa M Quintiliani
- Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sushrut S Waikar
- Section of Nephrology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amar D Bansal
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Department of General Medicine, Division of Renal-Electrolyte, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jane O Schell
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Department of General Medicine, Division of Renal-Electrolyte, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew L Lundquist
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine; and Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Margaret K Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mark L Unruh
- Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Christos Argyropoulos
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Michael J Germain
- Baystate Medical Center-University of Massachusetts Springfield, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Angelo Volandes
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- ACP Decisions Non-profit Foundation, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berkowitz CM, Ma J, Lowe J, Dolor RJ. Assessing Quality in Advance Care Planning Documentation: A Survey of Current Methods. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021; 39:945-950. [PMID: 34961362 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211060341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality advance care planning (ACP) documentation facilitates the communication of patients' wishes as they progress in their disease course and travel between health care settings. No consensus exists regarding evaluation of documentation quality, and diverse strategies for assessing quality have been adopted in clinical ACP studies. METHODOLOGY We conducted a literature review in PubMed and via manual search to identify clinical studies that assessed ACP quality or completeness as an outcome measure over a 5-year period. Studies that treated ACP as a binary outcome variable (present or absent), studies that took place outside of the US, and studies in pediatric populations were excluded from review. RESULTS We identified 11 studies for inclusion in our review. Across study methodologies, the following 8 quality domains were identified: discussion frequency, documentation accessibility, discussion timing, health care proxy, health goals or values, scope of treatment/code status, prognosis/illness understanding, and end of life (EOL) care planning. Each study assessed between 2 and 6 domains. Divergent methods for assessing quality domains were utilized, including manual qualitative analysis and natural language processing techniques. CONCLUSION Defining and measuring the quality of documentation is critical to developing ACP programs that improve patient care. Our review provides an adaptable framework centered around quality domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie M Berkowitz
- Department of Medicine, 214908University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jessica Ma
- 20054Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, 12277Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jared Lowe
- Department of Medicine, 214908University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rowena J Dolor
- Department of Medicine, 12277Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bernacki GM, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR, Kurella Tamura M, Brumback LC, Lavallee DC, Vig EK, O’Hare AM. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences of People Receiving Dialysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2010398. [PMID: 32833017 PMCID: PMC7445594 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preferences of patients receiving dialysis align with their values and other aspects of end-of-life care is not known. OBJECTIVE To describe the CPR preferences of patients receiving dialysis and how these preferences are associated with their responses to questions about other aspects of end-of-life care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional survey study of a consecutive sample of patients receiving dialysis at 31 nonprofit dialysis facilities in 2 US metropolitan areas (Seattle, Washington, and Nashville, Tennessee) between April 22, 2015, and October 2, 2018. Analyses for this article were conducted between December 2018 and April 2020. EXPOSURES Participants were asked to respond to the question "If you had to decide right now, would you want CPR if your heart were to stop beating?" Those who indicated they would probably or definitely want CPR were categorized as preferring CPR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES This study examined the association between preference for CPR and other treatment preferences, engagement in advance care planning, values, desired place of death, expectations about prognosis, symptoms, and palliative care needs. RESULTS Of the 1434 individuals invited to complete the survey, 1009 agreed to participate, and 876 were included in the analytic cohort (61.1%). The final cohort had a mean (SD) age of 62.6 (14.0) years; 492 (56.2%) were men, and 528 (60.3%) were White individuals. Among 738 of 876 participants (84.2%) who indicated that they would definitely or probably want CPR (CPR group), 555 (75.2%) wanted mechanical ventilation vs 13 of 138 (9.4%) of those who did not want CPR (do not resuscitate [DNR] group) (P < .001). A total of 249 of 738 participants (33.7%) in the CPR group vs 84 of 138 (60.9%) in the DNR group had documented treatment preferences (P < .001). In terms of values about future care, 171 participants (23.2%) in the CPR group vs 5 of 138 (3.6%) in the DNR group valued life prolongation (P < .001); 320 in the CPR group (43.4%) vs 109 of 138 in the DNR group (79.0%) valued comfort (P < .001); and 247 participants (33.5%) in the CPR group vs 24 of 138 (17.4%) in the DNR group were unsure about their wishes for future care (P < .001). In the CPR group, 207 (28.0%) had thought about stopping dialysis vs 62 of 138 (44.9%) in the DNR group (P < .001), and 181 (24.5%) vs 58 of 138 (42.0%) had discussed stopping dialysis (P = .001). No statistically significant associations were observed between CPR preference and documentation of a surrogate decision maker, thoughts or discussion of hospice, preferred place of death, expectations about prognosis, reported symptoms, or palliative care needs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The CPR preferences of patients receiving dialysis were associated with some, but not all, other aspects of end-of-life care. How participants responded to questions about these other aspects of end-of-life care were not always aligned with their CPR preference. More work is needed to integrate discussions about code status with bigger picture conversations about patients' values, goals, and preferences for end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen M. Bernacki
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Ruth A. Engelberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - J. Randall Curtis
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Manjula Kurella Tamura
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
- Division of Nephrology, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | - Elizabeth K. Vig
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Geriatrics, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ann M. O’Hare
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Hospital and Specialty Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|