AKI-A Relevant Safety End Point?

Reframing acute kidney injury as a pathophysiological continuum of disrupted renal excretory function

Surrogate measures of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) continue to serve as pivotal determinants of the incidence, severity, and management of acute kidney injury (AKI), as well as the primary reference point underpinning knowledge of its pathophysiology. However, several clinically important deficits in aspects of renal excretory function during AKI other than GFR decline, including acid-base regulation, electrolyte and water balance, and urinary concentrating capacity, can evade detection when diagnostic criteria are built around purely GFR-based assessments. The use of putative markers of tubular injury to detect "sub-clinical" AKI has been proposed to expand the definition and diagnostic criteria for AKI, but their diagnostic performance is curtailed by ambiguity with respect to their biological meaning and context specificity. Efforts to devise new holistic assessments of overall renal functional compromise in AKI would foster the capacity to better personalize patient care by replacing biomarker threshold-based diagnostic criteria with a shift to assessment of compromise along a pathophysiological continuum. The term AKI refers to a syndrome of sudden renal deterioration, the severity of which is classified by precise diagnostic criteria that have unquestionable utility in patient management as well as blatant limitations. Particularly, the absence of an explicit pathophysiological definition of AKI curtails further scientific development and clinical handling, entrapping the field within its present narrow GFR-based view. A refreshed approach based on a more holistic consideration of renal functional impairment in AKI as the basis for a new diagnostic concept that reaches beyond the boundaries imposed by the current GFR threshold-based classification of AKI, capturing broader aspects of pathogenesis, could enhance AKI prevention strategies and improve AKI patient outcome and prognosis.

Acute kidney injury during autologous stem cell transplantation in light chain amyloidosis with kidney involvement and their impact on prognosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication related to important organ dysfunction during autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. This study aims to validate the risk factors of AKI during different periods of ASCT and the impact of AKI on long-term outcomes. 302 patients with AL amyloidosis and kidney involvement who underwent ASCT were included. The procedures from stem cell mobilization to 30 days after transplantation were categorized into four periods: Period 0 (stem cell mobilization and harvest), Period 1 (preparation), Period 2 (conditioning and transplantation), and Period 3 (engraftment). The incidence of AKI during ASCT was 27.15% (0.66% in Period 0, 6.62% in Period 1, 15.23% in Period 2, and 6.95% in Period 3). The major causes of AKI were capillary leak syndrome in Period 0, ganciclovir or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in Period 1, high-dose melphalan in Period 2, and engraftment syndrome in Period 3. AKI in different periods had distinct risk factors and predictive models. AKI was a risk factor for both kidney survival and overall survival (OS). Even recovered AKI reduced 10-year kidney survival from 91.7% to 68.4% (p = 0.002) and 10-year OS from 91.1% to 77.7% (p = 0.005).

Optimum Care of AKI Survivors Not Requiring Dialysis after Discharge: An AKINow Recovery Workgroup Report

AKI survivors experience gaps in care that contribute to worse outcomes, experience, and cost.Challenges to optimal care include issues with information transfer, education, collaborative care, and use of digital health tools.Research is needed to study these challenges and inform optimal use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to promote recovery AKI affects one in five hospitalized patients and is associated with poor short-term and long-term clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Among those who survive to discharge, significant gaps in documentation, education, communication, and follow-up have been observed. The American Society of Nephrology established the AKINow taskforce to address these gaps and improve AKI care. The AKINow Recovery workgroup convened two focus groups, one each focused on dialysis-independent and dialysis-requiring AKI, to summarize the key considerations, challenges, and opportunities in the care of AKI survivors. This article highlights the discussion surrounding care of AKI survivors discharged without the need for dialysis. On May 3, 2022, 48 patients and multidisciplinary clinicians from diverse settings were gathered virtually. The agenda included a patient testimonial, plenary sessions, facilitated small group discussions, and debriefing. Core challenges and opportunities for AKI care identified were in the domains of transitions of care, education, collaborative care delivery, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and digital health applications. Integrated multispecialty care delivery was identified as one of the greatest challenges to AKI survivor care. Adequate templates for communication and documentation; education of patients, care partners, and clinicians about AKI; and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary posthospital follow-up plan form the basis for a successful care transition at hospital discharge. The AKINow Recovery workgroup concluded that advancements in evidence-based, patient-centered care of AKI survivors are needed to improve health outcomes, care quality, and patient and provider experience. Tools are being developed by the AKINow Recovery workgroup for use at the hospital discharge to facilitate care continuity.

Pathophysiology of Acute Kidney Frailty

Acute kidney frailty is a premorbid condition of diminished renal functional reserve that predisposes to acute kidney injury; this condition results from subclinical wear or distortion of renal homeostatic responses that protect the renal excretory function. Knowledge of its pathophysiological basis is critical for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that allow for prophylactic intervention and disease prevention.

Probing the Association between Acute Kidney Injury and Cardiovascular Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients hospitalized with AKI have higher subsequent risks of heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, and mortality than their counterparts without AKI, but these higher risks may be due to differences in prehospitalization patient characteristics, including the baseline level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the rate of prior eGFR decline, and the proteinuria level, rather than AKI itself.

METHODS

Among 2177 adult participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study who were hospitalized in 2013-2019, we compared subsequent risks of heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, and mortality between those with serum creatinine-based AKI (495 patients) and those without AKI (1682 patients). We report both crude associations and associations sequentially adjusted for prehospitalization characteristics including eGFR, eGFR slope, and urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR).

RESULTS

Compared with patients hospitalized without AKI, those with hospitalized AKI had lower eGFR prehospitalization (42 versus 49 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ), faster chronic loss of eGFR prehospitalization (-0.84 versus -0.51 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year), and more proteinuria prehospitalization (UPCR 0.28 versus 0.16 g/g); they also had higher prehospitalization systolic BP (130 versus 127 mm Hg; P < 0.01 for all comparisons). Adjustment for prehospitalization patient characteristics attenuated associations between AKI and all three outcomes, but AKI remained an independent risk factor. Attenuation of risk was similar after adjustment for absolute eGFR, eGFR slope, or proteinuria, individually or in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospitalization variables including eGFR, eGFR slope, and proteinuria confounded associations between AKI and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but these associations remained significant after adjusting for prehospitalization variables.

Overcoming barriers in the design and implementation of clinical trials for acute kidney injury: a report from the 2020 Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists meeting

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a growing epidemic and is independently associated with increased risk of death, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular events. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in this domain are notoriously challenging and many clinical studies in AKI have yielded inconclusive findings. Underlying this conundrum is the inherent heterogeneity of AKI in its etiology, presentation and course. AKI is best understood as a syndrome and identification of AKI subphenotypes is needed to elucidate the disease's myriad etiologies and to tailor effective prevention and treatment strategies. Conventional RCTs are logistically cumbersome and often feature highly selected patient populations that limit external generalizability and thus alternative trial designs should be considered when appropriate. In this narrative review of recent developments in AKI trials based on the Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists (KDCT) 2020 meeting, we discuss barriers to and strategies for improved design and implementation of clinical trials for AKI patients, including predictive and prognostic enrichment techniques, the use of pragmatic trials and adaptive trials.

The value of urinary interleukin-18 in predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

The aim of this study was to systematically review relevant studies to evaluate the value of urinary interleukin-18 (uIL-18) in predicting acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for literature published up to 1 August 2022. Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was applied to assess the literature quality. Then, relevant data were extracted from each eligible study and a random-effects regression model was utilized to pool sensitivity, specificity, and construct summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) and area under curve (AUC).

Results

Twenty-six studies with 7183 patients were enrolled and relevant information was extracted. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of uIL-18 in the diagnosis of AKI were 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54–0.73) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.71–0.83), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 6.08 (95%CI: 3.63–10.18), and the AUC of uIL-18 in predicting AKI was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.74–0.81). Subgroup analysis showed that uIL-18 in pediatric patients was more effective in predicting AKI than in adults (DOR: 7.33 versus 5.75; AUC: 0.81 versus 0.77).

Conclusions

Urinary IL-18 could be a relatively good biomarker with moderate predictive value for AKI, especially in pediatric patients. However, further research and clinical settings are still needed to validate our findings.

Major adverse kidney events after acute kidney injury in the pediatric intensive care unit: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is associated with poor short-term and long-term outcomes. Greater awareness of long-term AKI-associated outcomes is needed to optimally plan follow-up and management after ICU discharge. We used propensity score methods to study associations between pediatric AKI and major adverse kidney outcomes, including mortality.

METHODS

We included all children 6 months-18 years admitted to PICU at Seattle Children's Hospital from 7/1/2009 to 12/31/2018. Our primary outcome measure was Major Adverse Kidney Events at 30 days (MAKE30): creatinine > 200% of baseline, eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m², dialysis dependence, or mortality. Propensity scores for AKI development in PICU were generated using demographic, medical history, admission, and PICU hospitalization variables. Patients with AKI were matched to control patients without AKI. Logistic regression was used to test association between AKI status and MAKE30.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohort (n = 878), patients with AKI had lower platelet count (160 vs. 222) and higher PRISM III score (11 vs. 3.5). After propensity score matching, those with AKI vs. no AKI had similar PRISM III scores (9 vs. 10) and platelet count (163 vs. 159). AKI was significantly associated with MAKE30 after propensity score matching (OR: 2.97; 95% CI 1.82-4.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity score matching significantly reduced imbalance in baseline characteristics between those with and without AKI. After matching, AKI remained significantly associated with MAKE30. Patients who developed AKI were more likely to have abnormal kidney function at 30 and 90 days after ICU admission and may be at high risk for developing CKD in the future. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Optimizing the Design and Analysis of Future AKI Trials

AKI is a complex clinical syndrome associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly in critically ill and perioperative patient populations. Most AKI clinical trials have been inconclusive, failing to detect clinically important treatment effects at predetermined statistical thresholds. Heterogeneity in the pathobiology, etiology, presentation, and clinical course of AKI remains a key challenge in successfully testing new approaches for AKI prevention and treatment. This article, derived from the "AKI" session of the "Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists" virtual workshop held in October 2021, reviews barriers to and strategies for improving the design and implementation of clinical trials in patients with, or at risk of, developing AKI. The novel approaches to trial design included in this review span adaptive trial designs that increase the knowledge gained from each trial participant; pragmatic trial designs that allow for the efficient enrollment of sufficiently large numbers of patients to detect small, but clinically significant, treatment effects; and platform trial designs that use one trial infrastructure to answer multiple clinical questions simultaneously. This review also covers novel approaches to clinical trial analysis, such as Bayesian analysis and assessing heterogeneity in the response to therapies among trial participants. We also propose a road map and actionable recommendations to facilitate the adoption of the reviewed approaches. We hope that the resulting road map will help guide future clinical trial planning, maximize learning from AKI trials, and reduce the risk of missing important signals of benefit (or harm) from trial interventions.

Knocking down ETS Proto-oncogene 1 (ETS1) alleviates the pyroptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells in patients with acute kidney injury by regulating the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) transcription

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has a high mortality rate, but its pathogenesis remains unclear Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated renal tubular epithelial pyroptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of AKI. NLR family of pyrin domains containing 3 (NLRP3) plays an important role in pyroptosis. To further understand the transcriptional regulation mechanism of NLRP3, the peripheral blood of patients with AKI was analyzed in this study, showing that the levels of NLRP3 and cell pyroptosis in patients with AKI were significantly higher than those in normal controls. Furthermore, elevated levels of NLRP3 and cell pyroptosis were found in renal tubular epithelial cells after LPS treatment. Transcription factor ETS Proto-Oncogene 1 (ETS1) could bind to the upstream promoter transcription site of NLRP3 to transactivate NLRP3 in renal tubular epithelial cells. The cell pyroptosis level also decreased by knocking down ETS1. It is concluded that knocking down of ETS1 may reduce the renal tubular epithelial pyroptosis by regulating the transcription of NLRP3, thus relieving AKI. ETS1 is expected to be a molecular target for the treatment of AKI.

Stratifin promotes renal dysfunction in ischemic and nephrotoxic AKI mouse models via enhancing RIPK3-mediated necroptosis

Stratifin (SFN) is a member of the 14-3-3 family of highly conserved soluble acidic proteins, which regulates a variety of cellular activities such as cell cycle, cell growth and development, cell survival and death, and gene transcription. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is prevalent disorder characterized by inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and programmed cell death in renal tubular epithelial cells, but there is still a lack of effective therapeutic target for AKI. In this study, we investigated the role of SFN in AKI and the underlying mechanisms. We established ischemic and nephrotoxic AKI mouse models caused by ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) and cisplatin, respectively. We conducted proteomic and immunohistochemical analyses and found that SFN expression levels were significantly increased in AKI patients, cisplatin- or I/R-induced AKI mice. In cisplatin- or hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-treated human proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK2), we showed that knockdown of SFN significantly reduced the expression of kidney injury marker Kim-1, attenuated programmed cell death and inflammatory response. Knockdown of SFN also significantly alleviated the decline of renal function and histological damage in cisplatin-caused AKI mice in vivo. We further revealed that SFN bound to RIPK3, a key signaling modulator in necroptosis, to induce necroptosis and the subsequent inflammation in cisplatin- or H/R-treated HK2 cells. Overexpression of SFN increased Kim-1 protein levels in cisplatin-treated MTEC cells, which was suppressed by RIPK3 knockout. Taken together, our results demonstrate that SFN that enhances cisplatin- or I/R-caused programmed cell death and inflammation via interacting with RIPK3 may serve as a promising therapeutic target for AKI treatment.

Barriers to ACEI/ARB Use in Proteinuric Chronic Kidney Disease: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess present angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use among patients with proteinuric chronic kidney disease (CKD) and examine barriers limiting this guideline-concordant care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a nationwide database containing patient-level claims and integrated clinical information, we examined current ACEI/ARB prescriptions on the index date (April 15, 2017) and prior ACEI/ARB use in 41,743 insured adults with proteinuric CKD. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated adjusted associations between current ACEI/ARB use and putative barriers including past acute kidney injury (AKI), hyperkalemia, advanced CKD, and lack of nephrology care.

RESULTS

Only 49% (n=20,641) of patients had an active ACEI/ARB prescription on the index date, but 87% (n=36,199) had been previously prescribed an ACEI/ARB. Use was lower in patients with past AKI, hyperkalemia, CKD stages 4 or 5, and a lack of nephrology care (adjusted odds ratios were 0.61 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.64], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.80], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.51], and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.89], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Discontinuing, rather than never initiating, ACEI/ARB treatment limits guideline-concordant care in proteinuric CKD. Past AKI, hyperkalemia, advanced CKD, and lack of nephrology care were associated with lower use of ACEIs/ARBs, but these putative barriers may in many instances be inappropriate (AKI and advanced CKD) or modifiable (hyperkalemia and lack of nephrology care).