Knowledge Is Power: Patient Education as a Tool for Patient Activation

Optimizing Care Delivery in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Roundtable Discussion and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 37 million individuals in the United States (US) have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD have a substantial morbidity and mortality, which contributes to a huge economic burden to the healthcare system. A limited number of clinical pathways or defined workflows exist for CKD care delivery in the US, primarily due to a lower prioritization of CKD care within health systems compared with other areas (e.g., cardiovascular disease [CVD], cancer screening). CKD is a public health crisis and by the year 2040, CKD will become the fifth leading cause of years of life lost. It is therefore critical to address these challenges to improve outcomes in patients with CKD.

METHODS

The CKD Leaders Network conducted a virtual, 3 h, multidisciplinary roundtable discussion with eight subject-matter experts to better understand key factors impacting CKD care delivery and barriers across the US. A premeeting survey identified topics for discussion covering the screening, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of CKD across the care continuum. Findings from this roundtable are summarized and presented herein.

RESULTS

Universal challenges exist across health systems, including a lack of awareness amongst providers and patients, constrained care team bandwidth, inadequate financial incentives for early CKD identification, non-standardized diagnostic classification and triage processes, and non-centralized patient information. Proposed solutions include highlighting immediate and long-term financial implications linked with failure to identify and address at-risk individuals, identifying and managing early-stage CKD, enhancing efforts to support guideline-based education for providers and patients, and capitalizing on next-generation solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Payers and other industry stakeholders have opportunities to contribute to optimal CKD care delivery. Beyond addressing the inadequacies that currently exist, actionable tactics can be implemented into clinical practice to improve clinical outcomes in patients at risk for or diagnosed with CKD in the US.

Instruments for measuring patient health education competence among nursing personnel: A COSMIN-based systematic review

AIM

The goal of this systematic review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of existing patient health education competence instruments.

BACKGROUND

The patient health education competence of nursing personnel is a crucial factor that determines the quality of patient education, patients' quality of life, and patients' health-related outcomes. Although different instruments have been developed to assess patient health education competence, there is no comprehensive and rigorous systematic review to provide an overview and critical appraisal on these instruments. Therefore, a comprehensive systematic review of the measurement properties of such instruments is necessary.

DESIGN

A systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.

METHODS

In this study, six English databases and two Chinese databases were systematically searched for relevant publications, to retrieve studies that include instrument(s) measuring the patient health education competence of nursing personnel. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and literature evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies reporting 11 eligible instruments were included. No studies have reported cross-cultural validity, measurement error, or responsiveness of the instruments.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study, five instruments were recommended as Grade A, and the remaining six instruments were recommended as Grade B. The Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument is considered the most appropriate tool for assessing patient health education competence among the available instruments. Future related instrument development should be based on more rigorous testing and reporting, to ensure the validity and reliability of the instruments.

Relationship between patient activation and self-efficacy among patients undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study

Background

Patient activation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly being prioritized and considered a quality metric in CKD. Given the importance of patients’ activation in improving the quality of chronic disease care, this study aimed to assess patients’ activation levels and its relationship with self-efficacy among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 180 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were selected by random sampling from the largest hemodialysis center (dialysis center of Emam Reza hospital, Tabriz) in Iran. Data were collected by demographics, patient activation measure, and chronic kidney disease self-efficacy (CKD-SE) scale from March to May 2021. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS software (ver. 26) using ANOVA, t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple regression tests.

Results

The majority of the participants (35%) were at level 1 of activation and only 28.9% of the individuals were at level 4. According to the results, the mean score of self-efficacy in patients undergoing hemodialysis (in a possible range of 0–10) was 5.50 ± 1.45. Multiple regression analysis showed that factors including self-efficacy, educational level, and marital status were significant predictors of change in patient activation (R2 = 0.85, adjusted R2 = 0.66, p < 0.001). The results showed that self-efficacy was the main predictor of patient activation (β = 0.49, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

According to the result, improving the patients' self-efficacy could improve the patient's activation. Moreover, patients with lower educational level reported the lower activation score; therefore, health care providers should improve the knowledge of patients with lower educational level, encourage them to be more active in their health care, and help them in providing more tailored strategies to improve the quality of care more efficiently. Furthermore, Measuring patients' activation level at admission to the dialysis unit is recommended for all patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Genetics in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Numerous genes for monogenic kidney diseases with classical patterns of inheritance, as well as genes for complex kidney diseases that manifest in combination with environmental factors, have been discovered. Genetic findings are increasingly used to inform clinical management of nephropathies, and have led to improved diagnostics, disease surveillance, choice of therapy, and family counseling. All of these steps rely on accurate interpretation of genetic data, which can be outpaced by current rates of data collection. In March of 2021, Kidney Diseases: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a Controversies Conference on "Genetics in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)" to review the current state of understanding of monogenic and complex (polygenic) kidney diseases, processes for applying genetic findings in clinical medicine, and use of genomics for defining and stratifying CKD. Given the important contribution of genetic variants to CKD, practitioners with CKD patients are advised to "think genetic," which specifically involves obtaining a family history, collecting detailed information on age of CKD onset, performing clinical examination for extrarenal symptoms, and considering genetic testing. To improve the use of genetics in nephrology, meeting participants advised developing an advanced training or subspecialty track for nephrologists, crafting guidelines for testing and treatment, and educating patients, students, and practitioners. Key areas of future research, including clinical interpretation of genome variation, electronic phenotyping, global representation, kidney-specific molecular data, polygenic scores, translational epidemiology, and open data resources, were also identified.

The South African Nurse’s Knowledge of Occupational Human Immunodeficiency Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Era of Controlled and Stable HIV Prevalence

Knowledge is a crucial aspect of nursing. Nurses, just like any other healthcare workers (HCWs), are empowered with the knowledge of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Postexposure Prophylaxis (PEP) protocol to be followed, including post-exposure to blood and body fluids (BBFs). The utilization of HIV PEP demonstrated its capabilities to prevent HCWs from HIV infections. However, the practice in healthcare settings remains a challenge, as many HCWs do not adhere to the protocol. This study investigated how knowledgeable nurses are about HIV PEP in the era of controlled and stable HIV prevalence. Ninety-four nurses completed a self-administered questionnaire to provide information. A biostatistician assisted with data analysis, using Microsoft Excel converted to the STATA 13 format. Most (77.0%) were female with a mean age of 30 ± 9 years. The degree of knowledge was low, although the results showed that 90.43% of nurses had been informed about HIV PEP. Eighty (84%) did not know where to access HIV PEP, and (55.32%) were unaware of HIV PEP guidelines. A comparison between knowledge and work experience revealed that those with five years and less experience are less knowledgeable. There is a need to improve nurses’ knowledge of HIV PEP to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition from work-related activities.