Opioid Management in CKD

Mendelian randomization analysis revealed that albuminuria is the key factor affecting socioeconomic status in CKD patients

Previous studies indicate a strong correlation between the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and lower economic status. However, these studies often struggle to delineate a clear cause-effect relationship, leaving healthcare providers uncertain about how to manage kidney disease in a way that improves patients' financial outcomes. Our study aimed to explore and establish a causal relationship between CKD and socioeconomic status, identifying critical influencing factors. We utilized summary meta-analysis data from the CKDGen Consortium and UK Biobank. Genetic variants identified from these sources served as instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate the association between CKD and socioeconomic status. The presence or absence of CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and albuminuria were used as exposures, while income and regional deprivation were analyzed as outcomes. We employed the R packages 'TwoSampleMR' and 'Mendelianrandomization' to conduct both univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses, assessing for potential pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Our univariable MR analysis revealed a significant causal relationship between high levels of albuminuria and lower income (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96, p = 0.013), with no significant pleiotropy detected. In the multivariable MR analysis, both CKD (OR = 0.867, 95% CI: 0.786-0.957, p = 0.0045) and eGFR (OR = 0.065, 95% CI: 0.010-0.437, p = 0.0049) exhibited significant effects on income. This study underscores that higher albuminuria levels in CKD patients are associated with decreased income and emphasizes the importance of effective management and treatment of albuminuria in CKD patients to mitigate both social and personal economic burdens.

Music therapy in hemodialysis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) face significant challenges; however, non-pharmaceutical interventions hold potential for enhancing their quality of life. This paper evaluates the effects of music therapy on various mental and physiological outcomes in patients undergoing HD.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive database search conducted up to May 21, 2024, identified studies for inclusion based on PICOS criteria. The methodological quality of these studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Review Manager 5.4. For the meta-analysis, R and Stata/SE 15.1 were used, applying a random-effects model in cases of significant heterogeneity, and a fixed-effects model when heterogeneity was minimal.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies involving 1703 participants were analyzed. Music therapy significantly decreased anxiety (SMD: -0.72, 95 % CI: -0.97 to -0.46, I²: 83 %), pain (SMD: -1.22, 95 % CI: -1.68 to -0.75, I²: 93 %), depression (SMD: -0.85, 95 % CI: -1.31 to -0.39, I²: 77 %), stress (SMD: -0.93, 95 % CI: -1.17 to -0.68, I²: 41 %), and adverse reactions associated with HD (SMD: -0.67, 95 % CI: -0.88 to -0.46, I²: 0 %), all showing strong effect sizes (p < 0.001 for all). However, no significant changes were observed in sleep quality, fatigue, satisfaction with HD, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, or finger temperature. A slight reduction in respiration rate (p = 0.0072) and an increase in oxygen saturation (p = 0.0056) were noted. While music therapy showed promising results, the notable heterogeneity in pain and anxiety outcomes suggests careful interpretation, although no significant publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSION

Music therapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in improving the well-being of patients undergoing HD, particularly in reducing anxiety, pain, and stress. However, due to notable heterogeneity and methodological issues such as small sample sizes and inconsistent blinding, further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and establish more robust evidence.

Conversion ratios: Why is it so challenging to construct opioid conversion tables?

Standardizing opioid management is challenging due to the absence of a ceiling dose, the unknown ideal therapeutic plasma level, and the lack of an clear relationship between dose and therapeutic response. Opioid rotation or conversion, which is switching from one opioid, route of administration, or both, to another, to improve therapeutic response and reduce toxicities, occurs in 20-40 percent of patients treated with opioids. Opioid conversion is often needed when there are adverse effects, toxicities, or inability to tolerate a certain opioid formulation. A majority of patients benefit from opioid conversion, leading to improved analgesia and less adverse effects. There are different published ways of converting opioids in the literature. This review of 20 years of literature is centered on opioid conversions and aims to discuss the complexity of converting opioids. We discuss study designs, outcomes and measures, pain phenotypes, patient characteristics, comparisons of equivalent doses between opioids, reconciling conversion ratios between opioids, routes, directional differences, half-lives and metabolites, interindividual variability, and comparison to package insert information. Palliative care specialists have not yet come to a consensus on the ideal opioid equianalgesic table; however, we discuss a recently updated table, based on retrospective evidence, that may serve as a gold standard for practical use in the palliative care population. More robust, well-designed studies are needed to validate and guide future opioid conversion data.

Comparison of different sustained-release opioids and acute respiratory conditions in patients with cancer and chronic kidney disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Few data are available on the association between the use of oxycodone in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute respiratory conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate whether oxycodone is associated with an increased risk of acute respiratory conditions in patients with cancer and CKD compared with other opioids.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The data were obtained from a claims database in Japan. Patients with cancer and CKD who had received sustained-release opioids, including oral oxycodone, oral morphine, or transdermal fentanyl, between April 2014 and May 2021 were selected. The primary outcome was defined as an acute respiratory condition. Data for age and sex, morphine equivalent daily dose, concomitant use of specified medications, comorbidities defined based on the modified Charlson comorbidity index, substance use disorder, and lung cancer or metastatic lung cancer were investigated as covariates. Distribution of acute respiratory conditions was compared among the three sustained-release opioid groups using the log-rank test. Estimates of the incidence of acute respiratory conditions were compared among the groups using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying variables.

MAIN RESULTS

A significant difference in the distribution of acute respiratory conditions was found among the three groups (p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis showed a significantly higher risk of acute respiratory conditions with morphine (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-8.65, p = 0.04) compared with oxycodone but no significant difference in risk with oxycodone (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.32-1.38, p = 0.27) compared with fentanyl.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the risk of acute respiratory conditions may be lower in patients with CKD who use oxycodone for cancer pain than in those who use morphine. Additionally, no difference in the risk of acute respiratory conditions was found between oxycodone and fentanyl use.

Opioid Prescription in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Opioid Use in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Patients with diminished renal function necessitate special care. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), opioid analgesics should be prescribed based on the severity of renal insufficiency; this will determine treatment options at the beginning and throughout the management of pain in CKD patients. The dosage of hydrophilic drugs and drugs with active metabolites should be adjusted according to the severity of CKD, and the process of treatment should be monitored by modifying drug dosages as necessary for background and breakthrough pain. Patients with CKD may benefit from opioid analgesics that are lipophilic, such as methadone, fentanyl, and buprenorphine, as the first line; however, fentanyl is inappropriate for patients undergoing hemodialysis. Opioid prescription in CKD patients is the subject of this systematic review, which aims to compare their safety and efficacy. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations. Using three databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar), we collected and reviewed articles, including literature reviews, randomized control trials (RCTs), and systematic reviews published between 1980 and 2022, to enable us to gather enough valuable data on this rare topic. After applying appropriate filters, a total of 109 results were obtained. They were further screened and subjected to quality assessment tools, which finally yielded 11 studies included in this systematic review. This consisted of two RCTs, two systematic reviews, and seven narrative reviews. This review focused on the safety and appropriate use of opioids in patients with CKD. The accumulation of morphine and codeine metabolites may result in neurotoxic side effects. Hydromorphone and oxycodone are considered safe to administer but require careful adjustments in dosage. Common comorbidities among patients with CKD may amplify opioid-related adverse effects.